PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Refractory Period, Psychological”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm.

Bottleneck models of psychological refractory period (PRP) tasks suggest that a Task 1 response should be unaffected by the Task 2 response in the same trial, because selection of the former finishes before selection of the latter begins. Contrary to this conception, the authors found backward response-level crosstalk effects in which Task 2 response force requirements influenced the force-time dynamics of Task 1 responses. Specifically, Task 2 required a hard or soft keypress response. Task 1 responses were harder when the upcoming Task 2 response was to press hard rather than soft, suggesting some activation of Task 2 response parameters before Task 1 processing reached the final ballistic motor output stage. A 3rd experiment using a flankers paradigm showed that this effect did not arise from automatic activation of responses by the stimuli associated with hard and soft responses. This backward response-level crosstalk extends previous findings of backward crosstalk in the PRP paradigm by showing that crosstalk can affect motor output as well as response time and can arise even when the 2 tasks being performed are not semantically related.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

The psychological refractory period in Parkinson's disease.

The Psychological Refractory Period paradigm was used to investigate whether patients with Parkinson's disease showed disproportional deficits in regulating responses to two sequential presented stimuli. The first task required a speeded key-press response to an auditory stimulus, and the second task required a speeded key-press response to a visual stimulus. The stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between Task 1 and Task 2 was 50 msec., 150 msec., and 650 msec. According to the bottleneck model, the SOA manipulation should not affect performance on Task 1, but reaction time for Task 2 should increase as the SOA between the two tasks decreased. The increase in reaction time for Task 2 was referred to as the Psychological Refractory Period. In this study, both patients with Parkinson's disease and normal controls showed classical effects. More importantly, although the 22 patients with Parkinison's disease took longer to respond to both Tasks 1 and 2 than the 20 normal controls, the effects of the Psychological Refractory Period for the two groups were of the same magnitude. The results suggest that Parkinson's disease affects only the response-execution stages rather than the response-selection stages, based on the central bottleneck model.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1976

Reaction time and the psychological refractory period in children and adults.

The psychological refractory period-the prolonged reaction time (RT) to the second of 2 closely-spaced stimuli-was investigated in groups of 13 children and 13 adults. Subjects responded as fast as possible to the 2nd of 2 loud clicks that were presented after a soft click which served as a ready signal. The inter-stimulus interval (ISI), or time between loud clicks, was investigated as an independent variable. The results for ISI's of 50, 100, 250, and 500 msec confirmed the existence of an inverse relationship between RT and ISI. In accordance with the hypothesis investigated, RT was more prolonged in children than in adults as ISI decreased. Findings were consistent with the view that refractory period (RP) of an information-processing element in the central processor is longer in children than in adults. A single-channel model of information processing was proposed which could explain the inverse relationship between RT and ISI; could account for the slope differences between the RT vs ISI curves from children and adults; and could account, in part, for the overall longer RT's of children than of adults.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2002

Ideomotor compatibility in the psychological refractory period effect: 29 years of oversimplification.

Four experiments examined whether the psychological refractory period (PRP) effect can be eliminated with ideomotor compatible (IM) but not stimulus-response compatible (SR) tasks, as reported by A. G. Greenwald and H. G. Shulman (1973). Their tasks were used: a left or right movement to a left- or right-pointing arrow (IM) or to the word left or right (SR) for Task 1; saying "A" or "B" (IM) or "1" or "2" (SR) to an auditory A or B for Task 2. The stimulus onset asynchronies were 0, 100, 200, 300, 500, and 1,000 ms in Experiment 1, and only 0, 100, 200, and 1,000 ms in Experiments 2-4. The arrow was in the center of the screen in Experiments 1-3 and to the left or right in Experiment 4. As in Greenwald and Shulman's Experiment 2, the instructions stated that most often the 2 stimuli would be presented simultaneously. A PRP effect was obtained in all conditions, most likely because response-selection decisions are required even for IM tasks.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2006

Is the psychological refractory period effect for ideomotor compatible tasks eliminated by speed-stress instructions?

It has been argued that the psychological refractory period (PRP) effect is eliminated with two ideomotor compatible tasks when instructions stress fast and simultaneous responding. Three experiments were conducted to test this hypothesis. In all experiments, Task 1 required spatially compatible manual responses (left or right) to the direction of an arrow, and Task 2 required saying the name of the auditory letter A or B. In Experiments 1 and 3, the manual responses were keypresses made with the left and right hands, whereas in Experiment 2 they were left-right toggle-switch movements made with the dominant hand. Instructions that stressed response speed reduced reaction time and increased error rate compared to standard instructions to respond fast and accurately, but did not eliminate the PRP effect on Task 2 reaction time. These results imply that, even when response speed is emphasized, ideomotor compatible tasks do not bypass response selection.

Humans↗
PubMed2004

Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect?

Can dual-task practice remove age-related differences in the psychological refractory period (PRP) effect? To answer this question, younger and older individuals practiced 7 blocks of a PRP design, in which Task 1 (T1) required a vocal response to an auditory stimulus and Task 2 (T2) required a manual response to a visual stimulus (Experiment 1). The results showed that practice did not reduce, but rather increased, age-related differences in PRP interference. Using the trained individuals, the introduction of a less complex new T1 (Experiment 2) or a less complex new T2 (Experiment 3) with the task previously practiced reduced the PRP interference but only in older adults. The authors propose that older adults suffer from a large task-switch cost that is more sensitive to task complexity than to the amount of practice.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Probing the response selection bottleneck with a cardiac measure: individual differences in strategy for a psychological refractory period task.

We examined the coordination of processing streams when two reaction stimuli are presented with minimal temporal separation (the psychological refractory period, PRP, paradigm). We tested the hypothesis that individuals that grouped responses to the two stimuli would schedule response preparation later than those not-grouping their responses would. Performance measures were combined with a cardiac measure interpreted as an index of response inhibition. Forty-two college-aged participants performed an auditory choice task followed in 50, 100 or 400 ms by a visual choice reaction time (RT) task. Performance results replicated prior work. The timing of cardiac inter-beat intervals (IBIs) showed that participants grouping their reactions did appear to delay response preparation; while Non-Groupers promptly initiated response selection for the initial task. These results generally supported the importance of preparation for understanding the coordination of processing streams.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Functional magnetic resonance imaging provides new constraints on theories of the psychological refractory period.

We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the psychological refractory period (PRP), the delay in the response to the second of two tasks occurring in immediate succession. Our results were consistent with prior work on the PRP in that when two visual-manual tasks were presented within 100 ms of each other, the second response was delayed on the order of 500 ms, compared with when the two tasks were separated by 1,500 ms. Surprisingly, in brain regions postulated to be important for executive functions, there was virtually no increase in brain activation in the short-interval compared with the long-interval condition. These data suggest that passive queuing, rather than active monitoring, occurs during the PRP.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

The psychological refractory period of stopping.

The author examined whether the act of control of stopping is subject to the psychological refractory period (PRP) and whether stopping causes a PRP for the processing of subsequent stimuli. The task was to execute or to stop a rapid finger tapping. PRP interference was predicted for double-stimulation trials, in which 2 signals to tap or stop were presented in rapid succession. The experiments showed that stopping ongoing action is subject to and produces PRP interference similar to starting. Responses to signals to continue an ongoing action do not produce PRP interference. The results suggest that selection or initiation of new responses, but not mere response choice, constituted the processing bottleneck that caused the PRP in the present task. Further results indicate that the inhibition of not-yet-executed actions, in contrast to action termination, does not suffer PRP interference and that response inhibitions and terminations should be distinguished. ((c) 2003 APA, all rights reserved)

Adaptation, Psychological↗