Vaccines. Rotavirus vaccines' second chance.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Results for “Rotavirus Vaccines”
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Concurrent oral poliovirus and rhesus-human reassortant rotavirus vaccination: effects on immune responses to both vaccines and on efficacy of rotavirus vaccines. The US Rotavirus Vaccine Efficacy Group.
Interference between oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) and monovalent (RRV-S1) and tetravalent (RRV-TV) rhesus-human rotavirus vaccines was evaluated. Serum antibody responses to OPV and rotavirus vaccines and efficacy of rotavirus vaccines were compared among control and vaccine groups stratified by number of concurrent OPV and rotavirus vaccinations received. Neutralizing antibody titers to poliovirus type 1 tended to rise more steeply in placebo than RRV-TV recipients, but there were no significant differences in seroprevalence or in geometric mean titers (GMTs) of antibodies to types 1, 2, or 3 among groups. Concurrent OPV resulted in lower IgA GMTs to rotavirus in RRV-S1 but not RRV-TV recipients. Rotavirus gastroenteritis rates among rotavirus vaccines did not differ by number of concurrent OPV doses received, but the sample sizes were too small to rule out any effect. These results suggest OPV and rhesus-human rotavirus vaccines may be given at the same visit in the United States.
Administration, Oral↗
Update on rotavirus vaccines.
Rotavirus was discovered in 1973, and 10 years later the first report of a rotavirus vaccine clinical trial appeared. This update reviews the epidemiology of rotavirus infections, assesses past and current vaccines and presents ideas for implementation of vaccination programs in developed and developing countries.
Animals↗
Oral tetravalent rotavirus vaccine can be successfully coadministered with oral poliovirus vaccine and a combined diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine. US Rhesus Rotavirus Vaccine Study Group.
AIM: To determine whether an oral tetravalent rotavirus vaccine (RV-TV) can be safely coadministered with a combined diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (DTP/Hib) and oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) to healthy infants without interfering with the immune responses to any of the component antigens. METHODS: Two hundred sixty-seven infants ages 2 to 3 months were randomly assigned in a double blind fashion to receive three doses of either placebo or RV-TV, each containing 4 x 10(5) plaque-forming units, concurrently with DTP/ Hib (Tetramune) and OPV at approximately 2, 4 and 6 months of age. Infants were followed for 5 days after each dose for the occurrence of adverse events and subsequently until 3 to 6 weeks after the third dose of RV-TV or placebo. Immune responses were assessed by measuring the postvaccination serum antibody titers to each component of DTP/ Hib and OPV at 3 to 6 weeks after the third dose. RESULTS: The percentage of infants who attained protective antibody titers and the distribution of antibody titers against diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid and H. influenzae type b were not statistically different between RV-TV and placebo recipients. The distribution of antibody titers against different antigens of Bordetella pertussis (agglutinins, pertussis toxoid, filamentous hemagglutinin, fimbriae antigens and the 69-kDa outer membrane protein) was compared and no significant differences were found. The percentage of infants with detectable neutralizing antibodies against the three serotypes of poliovirus and the distribution of antibody titers was not statistically different between RV-TV and placebo recipients. There were no clinically meaningful differences in postvaccination reactions between RV-TV and placebo recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Three doses of RV-TV can be safely coadministered with three doses of DTP/ Hib and OPV without diminishing an infant's serum antibody responses to each component of these vaccines. Therefore RV-TV can be given at the standard childhood visits at 2, 4 and 6 months of age.
Antibodies, Bacterial↗
Comparative evaluation of reactogenicity and immunogenicity of two dosages of oral tetravalent rhesus rotavirus vaccine. US Rhesus Rotavirus Vaccine Study Group.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and immunogenicity of two dosages of tetravalent rhesus rotavirus vaccine (RRV-TV) and the effect of age at dosing. METHODS: A total of 195 infants were stratified by age into 2 groups, 6 to 12 weeks and 16 to 24 weeks, and randomly assigned to receive a single dose of placebo or RRV-TV containing either 4 x 10(5) or 4 x 10(6) plaque-forming units (pfu). Symptoms were recorded for 5 days after vaccination. Anti-rotavirus IgA and neutralizing antibody to human rotavirus serotypes G1 to G4 and RRV were measured in serum obtained pre- and postvaccination. RESULTS: Rates of fever > 38 degrees C (9%), diarrhea (6%) and vomiting (8%) were similar in all groups. IgA (69% vs. 49%, P = 0.02) and RRV (85% vs. 66%, P = 0.004) seroconversion rates were significantly higher in the 4 x 10(6) pfu vaccine group as were antibody titers to RRV (440.2 vs. 263.7, P = 0.04). Older infants demonstrated significantly higher seroconversion rates and antibody titers for IgA (71% vs. 52%, P = 0.03; and 110.6 vs. 54.8, P = 0.004) and RRV (92% vs. 66%, P = 0.05 and 498.3 vs. 205.6, P = 0.01) at either dose level than did the younger infants. There were no significant differences in seroconversion rates or antibody titers to human rotavirus types G1 to G4 between the two vaccination groups. CONCLUSIONS: RRV-TV at a dose of 4 x 10(6) pfu can be safely administered to infants 6 to 24 weeks of age. A single dose of 4 x 10(6) pfu of RRV-TV was significantly more immunogenic than a single dose of 4 x 10(5) pfu but did not improve responses to the human serotypes. Older vaccine recipients demonstrated significantly higher IgA and neutralizing antibody seroconversion rates and antibody titers than younger infants independent of dosage.
Administration, Oral↗
Serologic correlates of immunity in a tetravalent reassortant rotavirus vaccine trial. US Rotavirus Vaccine Efficacy Group.
The correlation of antibody responses (serum rotavirus IgA and neutralizing antibody to serotype G1-G4 human rotaviruses and rhesus rotavirus [RRV]) in a reassortant rotavirus vaccine trial with protection against rotavirus infection or disease was investigated. Most subjects administered 4 x 10(5) pfu of either the serotype G1 monovalent or serotype G1-G4 tetravalent vaccine seroconverted for at least one of the six antibodies (85% and 91%, respectively). However, fewer than one-third seroconverted to any prototype G1-G4 human rotavirus. Analyses of covariance indicated that higher prevaccination neutralizing antibody titers negatively affected postvaccination titers. Significant relationships were found between several postvaccination rotavirus antibody titers and protection, and serotype-specific correlates of protection were identified between anti-Wa titers and G1 illnesses (P = .03) and between anti-RRV titers and G3 illnesses (P < .001). Overall, however, serotype-specific immunity was no more significant than heterotypic immunity, and no specific titer of any antibody analyzed was a reliable indicator of protection.
Antibodies, Viral↗
Candidate rotavirus vaccine (rhesus rotavirus strain) in children: an evaluation.
Fifty children, 3 months to 12 years of age, were given an experimental, orally administered, live attenuated rotavirus vaccine. Overall evidence of vaccine effectiveness as judged by vaccine virus shedding or a serologic response was seen in 82% of vaccinees. No clinical illness was seen in the rotavirus vaccinees when compared with 40 concurrently studied control children. No transmission to control children was observed even with close daily contact in a day-care setting. Young infants, generally less than 1 year of age, who had not previously experienced wild-type rotavirus infection shed significantly more vaccine virus. Limitation of virus shedding in those already exposed may be related to a prompt copro-IgA response which was significantly elevated by three days after vaccination. In summary, the development of this rotavirus vaccine, rhesus rotavirus-MMU-18006, is a promising step in the development of immunoprophylaxis against this major enteric pathogen.
Antibodies, Viral↗
Rotavirus vaccines.
Rotavirus, the most common cause of severe diarrhea and a leading cause of mortality in children, has been a priority target for vaccine development for the past several years. The first rotavirus vaccine licensed in the United States was withdrawn because of an association of the vaccine with intussusception. However, the need for a vaccine is greatest in the developing world, because the benefits of preventing deaths due to rotavirus disease are substantially greater than the risk of intussusception. Early vaccines were based on animal strains. More recently developed and licensed vaccines are either animal-human re-assortants or are based on human strains. In India, two candidate vaccines are in the development process, but have not yet reached efficacy trials. Many challenges regarding vaccine efficacy and safety remain. In addition to completing clinical evaluations of vaccines in development in settings with the highest disease burden and virus diversity, there is also a need to consider alternative vaccine development strategies.
Animals↗
Epitope-specific immune responses to rotavirus vaccination.
Rotavirus gastroenteritis is a leading cause of infant mortality in developing countries and an important cause of morbidity in children under 2 yr of age in the United States. Vaccine programs have evaluated animal rotavirus strains that are attenuated in humans but antigenically similar to some human strains. Whether a single vaccine strain can elicit protective immunity in humans to rotaviruses of the same or different serotypes is an important question in determining vaccine efficacy. We used characterized serotype-specific monoclonal antibodies directed at VP7 in a competitive solid-phase immunoassay to measure epitope-specific immune responses to serotypes 1, 2, and 3 in sera of children who received a candidate serotype-3 rotavirus vaccine. Antibodies to serotype 3 were detected in 72% of sera samples, and to serotype 1 and 2 in only 11% each. Also, a VP3-specific monoclonal antibody which neutralizes three serotypically distinct strains of rotavirus was used to detect the presence of similar antibodies in 56% of the test sera. This finding suggests a mechanism of heterotypic immunity.
Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
Prospects for development of a rotavirus vaccine against rotavirus diarrhea in infants and young children.
Major advances have been made in elucidating the etiologic agents of severe infantile diarrhea, and it is clear that rotaviruses are the single most important etiologic agents. Progress in the development of rotavirus vaccine candidates has also moved swiftly with the "Jennerian" approach, in which a related live, attenuated rotavirus strain from a nonhuman host is used as the immunizing antigen. If this strategy is not effective against all rotavirus serotypes, reassortant rotaviruses hold great promise for the development of a multivalent vaccine. Field trials with the "Jennerian" approach vaccines are under way, and phase 1 trials with the reassortants have been initiated.
Animals↗
Immunity and correlates of protection for rotavirus vaccines.
Rotaviruses are the most common cause of severe, dehydrating diarrhea in children worldwide. The tremendous global incidence of rotavirus gastroenteritis, especially in developing countries, emphasizes the need for vaccines to prevent associated morbidity and mortality. However, immunity to rotavirus is not completely understood. At this time, total serum RV IgA, measured shortly after infection, appears to be the best marker of protection against rotavirus. This review describes the current understanding of rotavirus immunity, including mechanisms of protection against rotavirus from selected animal models, and correlates of protection associated with natural infection or vaccination from humans.
Animals↗
[Anti-rotavirus vaccinations].
Rotavirus is the most common cause of severe acute diarrhea, responsible for 30 to 40 deaths of children each year in France. In order to decrease both mortality and morbidity, vaccines have been designed first from attenuated bovine strains, then from monovalent simian strains, and more recently from reassortant rhesus strains. The live tetravalent human-rhesus reassortant vaccine (RRT-TV) has been shown to be protective in the United States, Finland, and Venezuela despite different environments, in prospective double-blind studies. This vaccine, as the natural infection, decreases by 50% the risk of acute rotavirus diarrhea and by 70 to 100% the risk of severe diarrhea with dehydration. At the present time, its cost limits its use to developed countries. It was put on the market in the United States in October 1998. The challenge is now to make it available in developing countries.
Animals↗
Rotavirus vaccine effectiveness against rotavirus and acute gastroenteritis mortality: an analysis of pooled case-control studies from the MNSSTER-V dataset.
BACKGROUND: Rotavirus accounts for an estimated 25% of diarrhoea deaths in children under 5 years globally, and more than 140 countries have included rotavirus vaccines in their routine national infant vaccination programmes. We aimed to calculate rotavirus vaccine effectiveness against rotavirus-positive and all-cause acute gastroenteritis deaths. METHODS: The Multi-National Subpopulations Study to Evaluate Rotavirus Vaccines (MNSSTER-V) dataset combines child-level data from test-negative case-control studies of rotavirus vaccine effectiveness that enrolled children under 5 years of age seeking care for acute gastroenteritis at hospitals or emergency departments in 24 countries between July 1, 2007, and Aug 24, 2023. Children were included in this study if they were: younger than 5 years, met the acute gastroenteritis case definition (had at least three episodes of diarrhoea in a 24-h period, had non-bloody and non-chronic diarrhoea, and were enrolled within 7 days of diarrhoea onset), met vaccine card quality metrics, had vaccine delivery dates if the child was reported to have received a rotavirus vaccine, and had a reported outcome of death or discharge. In-hospital acute gastroenteritis deaths were characterised, and rotavirus vaccine effectiveness against all-cause and rotavirus-positive acute gastroenteritis mortality was calculated using an unconditional logistic regression model with adjustment for national under-5 mortality strata and child's age. Vaccine effectiveness analyses against all-cause and rotavirus-positive acute gastroenteritis mortality were restricted to children aged at least 3 months who received any routine vaccines from countries reporting at least one acute gastroenteritis death. FINDINGS: From the MNSSTER-V dataset, we included 27 252 children younger than 5 years enrolled from 22 countries; outcomes of patients were not available for two countries. At least one in-hospital acute gastroenteritis death was reported from 16 countries including 21 522 children; in total, 183 all-cause acute gastroenteritis deaths and 25 rotavirus-positive deaths were reported. Among children aged at least 3 months who had received any routine vaccines, receiving at least one dose of a rotavirus vaccine had an adjusted vaccine effectiveness of 75·8% (95% CI 28·4 to 91·8; n=13 630) against rotavirus-positive acute gastroenteritis mortality and 20·8% (-47·0 to 57·3; n=20 005) against all-cause acute gastroenteritis mortality. INTERPRETATION: Rotavirus vaccines are effective in preventing rotavirus-positive acute gastroenteritis mortality. Continued efforts to improve vaccine delivery could help to reduce acute gastroenteritis mortality due to rotavirus worldwide. FUNDING: None.
Humans↗
Neonatal rotavirus vaccination with RIT 4237 bovine rotavirus vaccine: a preliminary report.
We vaccinated 244 newborn infants orally with RIT 4237 bovine rotavirus vaccine or placebo and followed them serologically and clinically for 16 months. Initially 39 of the 119 (33%) vaccine recipients compared with 1 of the 120 placebo recipients seroconverted by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-immunoglobulin M. After the first winter rotavirus season, at 7 months of age 55% of the vaccinated infants and 37% of the unvaccinated infants were rotavirus-seropositive by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-immunoglobulin G (P less than 0.01, chi square test). At 12 months of age, after a low rotavirus prevalence season, 34% of the vaccinated children and 23% of the unvaccinated children remained seropositive. There were 14 confirmed episodes of rotavirus gastroenteritis in the vaccine group and 10 episodes in the placebo group during the first 16 months. However, only 1 of the episodes in the vaccine group was severe, 4 were moderately severe and 9 were mild, whereas 7 episodes in the placebo group were severe and 3 were moderately severe (P less than 0.001 between groups, Fisher's exact test). There was no clear correlation between vaccine-induced clinical protection and initial serologic response (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-immunoglobulin M) to vaccination, but during follow-up severe rotavirus gastroenteritis was more likely to occur in children with no serum rotavirus immunoglobulin G antibody at the time of infection. We conclude at the present stage that neonatal rotavirus vaccination with RIT 4237 vaccine gives no protection against rotavirus infection but appears to modify the severity of gastroenteritis.
Clinical Trials as Topic↗
Clinical efficacy of the RIT 4237 live attenuated bovine rotavirus vaccine in infants vaccinated before a rotavirus epidemic.
In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 331 infants aged 6 to 12 months received orally, at an interval of 1 month, either two doses of live attenuated bovine rotavirus vaccine strain RIT 4237 or equivalent placebo. The vaccinations were carried out during September to November, a non-rotavirus season; only three cases of rotavirus diarrhea occurred in the study group before the vaccinations were completed. During the epidemic season from December to May, 31 patients with clinically significant rotavirus diarrhea required therapy. Five of these were among the 168 vaccine recipients, and 26 among the 160 placebo recipients (P less than 0.001), giving a vaccine protection rate of 82%. The incidence of clinically significant diarrhea from all causes was reduced by 76% in the vaccinees. As determined by an enzyme immunoassay antibody test with homologous virus antigen, seroconversion after vaccination was obtained in 53% of the initially seronegative infants. Clinical protection correlated well with seroconversion, but the vaccinees who failed to seroconvert also had less rotavirus diarrhea than the placebo recipients, suggesting that immunity may be mediated by factors other than serum EIA antibody. Seventeen of the 23 rotavirus isolates in the epidemic season that were typed were of serotype 1, two were of serotype 2, and four were of serotype 3. The protection rates against clinically significant diarrhea were 72%, 100%, and 100% for serotypes 1, 2, and 3, respectively. We conclude that epidemic infantile winter diarrhea associated with human rotaviruses can be significantly reduced by vaccination with the live attenuated RIT 4237 bovine rotavirus vaccine before the epidemic season.
Clinical Trials as Topic↗
Live attenuated human rotavirus vaccine, Rotarix.
Rotavirus infections are the leading cause of severe gastroenteritis in young children worldwide. Recently two new rotavirus vaccines have entered the world market. This review provides a summary of the rationale, development, and evaluation of one of these vaccines, Rotarix. Rotarix is a live oral rotavirus vaccine developed from a single protective human strain following multiple passages in tissue culture to attenuate the strain. The vaccine is administered as two oral doses at approximately 2 and 4 months of age. Large safety and efficacy trials have shown the vaccine is safe, not associated with intussusception, and effective against the most common circulating human serotypes. Efficacy against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis and hospitalization have ranged from 85 to 100 percent.
Administration, Oral↗
The rotavirus vaccine saga.
Rotavirus is the single most common cause of acute, dehydrating gastroenteritis worldwide. This is a highly contagious and highly democratic disease. The attack rate in infants and young children is similar regardless of sanitation, socioeconomics or geography. Rotavirus vaccine development began in the early 1980s using a "Jennerian" approach based on rotaviruses that normally infect animals. Although these vaccines were found to be generally safe, protection from disease was inconsistent. The second generation of vaccines was based on the same animal viruses configured to carry the relevant coat proteins of human rotaviruses. An attenuated human rotavirus vaccine has also been developed. After close to 20 years of laboratory and clinical studies, safe and effective rotavirus vaccines are approaching regulatory approval.
Child↗
Mice develop effective but delayed protective immune responses when immunized as neonates either intranasally with nonliving VP6/LT(R192G) or orally with live rhesus rotavirus vaccine candidates.
Rotavirus vaccines are delivered early in life, when the immune system is immature. To determine the effects of immaturity on responses to candidate vaccines, neonatal (7 days old) and adult mice were immunized with single doses of either Escherichia coli-expressed rotavirus VP6 protein and the adjuvant LT(R192G) or live rhesus rotavirus (RRV), and protection against fecal rotavirus shedding following challenge with the murine rotavirus strain EDIM was determined. Neonatal mice immunized intranasally with VP6/LT(R192G) were unprotected at 10 days postimmunization (dpi) and had no detectable rotavirus B-cell (antibody) or CD4(+) CD8(+) T-cell (rotavirus-inducible, Th1 [gamma interferon and interleukin-2 {IL-2}]-, Th2 [IL-5 and IL-4]-, or ThIL-17 [IL-17]-producing spleen cells) responses. However, by 28 and 42 dpi, these mice were significantly (P >or= 0.003) protected and contained memory rotavirus-specific T cells but produced no rotavirus antibody. In contrast, adult mice were nearly fully protected by 10 dpi and contained both rotavirus immunoglobulin G and memory T cells. Neonates immunized orally with RRV were also less protected (P=0.01) than adult mice by 10 dpi and produced correspondingly less rotavirus antibody. Both groups contained few rotavirus-specific memory T cells. Protection levels by 28 dpi for neonates or adults were equal, as were rotavirus antibody levels. This report introduces a neonatal mouse model for active protection studies with rotavirus vaccines. It indicates that, with time, neonatal mice develop full protection after intranasal immunization with VP6/LT(R192G) or oral immunization with a live heterologous rotavirus and supports reports that protection depends on CD4(+) T cells or antibody, respectively.
Adjuvants, Immunologic↗