PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Evaluation of lymph node status in male breast cancer patients: a role for sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is rapidly emerging as an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for many female breast cancer patients. In contrast, ALND remains the standard of care for male breast cancer patients with similar tumors. We evaluated the results of SLN biopsy in male breast cancer patients with clinically negative axillae. This study included all male breast cancer patients who underwent SLN biopsy at our institution between October 1999 and 2000. All patients had negative axillae on clinical examination and sonography. All patients underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy followed by SLN biopsy performed using a combination of isosulfan blue dye and technetium Tc 99m sulfur colloid. Tc 99m sulfur colloid was injected at a dose of 2.5 mCi 24 h before surgery (four patients) or 0.5 mCi 2-4 h before surgery (three patients). Intraoperatively, 5 ml of 1% isosulfan blue was injected adjacent to the breast tumor or biopsy cavity prior to SLN biopsy. A gamma probe was used intraoperatively in order to localize SLNs. Any node that was blue or associated with ex vivo radioactivity counts at least 10 times higher than the axillary background counts was defined as a SLN. SLNs were assessed intraoperatively using touch preparation cytologic examination. Completion ALND was performed if nodal metastases were identified. Seven patients, 44-76 years of age, were included in the study. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy identified SLNs in five patients. Intraoperatively, SLNs were identified in all seven patients. SLNs were identified in six patients using the gamma probe and in all seven patients using blue dye. The mean number of SLNs encountered was 2.9. Findings on touch preparation cytology correlated with findings on the final pathological analysis examination in all patients. One patient had a positive SLN, this patient had three additional positive nodes identified in his completion ALND specimen. Three patients with negative SLNs had been elected preoperatively to undergo ALND regardless of findings on SLN biopsy, no positive lymph nodes were identified in the ALND specimens from these patients. These findings compare favorably with findings reported in the literature regarding SLN biopsy in female breast cancer patients. Blue dye injection and radioisotope injection were complementary. SLN biopsy should be considered for axillary staging in male breast cancer patients with clinically negative axillae.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Second biopsy of axillary sentinel lymph node for reappearing breast cancer after previous sentinel lymph node biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a safe and accurate axillary staging procedure for patients with primary operable breast cancer. An increasing proportion of these patients undergo breast-conserving surgery, and 5% to 15% will develop local relapses that necessitate reoperation. Although a previous SLNB is often considered a contraindication for a subsequent SLNB, few data support this concern. METHODS: Between January 2000 and June 2004, 79 patients who were previously treated at our institution with breast-conserving surgery and who had a negative SLNB for early breast cancer developed, during follow-up, local recurrence that was amenable to reoperation. Eighteen of these patients were offered a second SLNB because of a clinically negative axillary status an average of 26.1 months after the primary event. RESULTS: In all 18 patients (7 with ductal carcinoma-in-situ and 11 with invasive recurrences), preoperative lymphoscintigraphy showed an axillary sentinel lymph node, with a preoperative identification rate of 100%, and 1 or more SLNs (an average of 1.3 per patient) were surgically removed. Sentinel lymph node metastases were detected in two patients with invasive recurrence, and a complete axillary dissection followed. At a median follow up of 12.7 months, no axillary recurrences have occurred in patients who did not undergo axillary dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Second SLNB after previous SLNB is technically feasible and likely effective in selected breast cancer patients. A larger population and longer follow-up are necessary to confirm these preliminary data.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Specificity of tyrosinase and HMB45 PCR in the detection of melanoma metastases in sentinel lymph node biopsies.

AIMS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is an increasingly established procedure in the primary staging of high-risk melanoma patients. However, the laboratory evaluation of sentinel lymph node biopsies is a matter of controversy. The aim of this study was to determine the specificity of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques for the evaluation of lymph nodes with regard to melanoma metastases in comparison with histology and immunohistology. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sentinel lymph nodes (n = 41) from 29 melanoma patients and 29 lymph nodes from 27 patients without melanoma were analysed by histology (H&E) and immunohistology (Melan A, HMB45). cDNA of these lymph nodes was subjected to LightCycler PCR amplification using primers specific for tyrosinase and HMB45. Two melanoma sentinel lymph nodes contained naevus cells by histology and immunohistology and were therefore excluded from further evaluation. Eight (20.5%) of the remaining 39 melanoma sentinel lymph nodes were positive by histology and immunohistology and tyrosinase PCR, 15.4% (6/39) were positive only by tyrosinase PCR, 2.6% (1/39) were positive only by histology and immunohistology. HMB45 PCR revealed positive results in 7.7% (3/39) sentinel lymph nodes, which were also positive by tyrosinase PCR and histology and immunohistology. Of non-melanoma lymph nodes 13.8% (4/29) and 14.8% (4/27) of non-melanoma patients were positive by tyrosinase PCR but negative by histology and immunohistology and HMB45 PCR. Thus, tyrosinase PCR had a specificity of only 85.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The specificity of tyrosinase PCR and the sensitivity of HMB45 PCR are too low to recommend these PCR examinations for the guidance of therapy, in particular complete regional lymph node dissection.

Antigens, Neoplasm↗
PubMed2004

Axillary recurrence after sentinel lymph node biopsy.

UNLABELLED: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) without further axillary dissection in patients with sentinel node-negative breast carcinoma appears to be a safe procedure to ensure locoregional control. During a median follow-up of 35 months the false-negative rate was 1% in our study population of 185 patients. BACKGROUND: The objective of this prospective study is to provide data on follow-up of patients with primary operable breast carcinoma staged with SLNB without axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) if the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were tumour-negative. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-five patients were enrolled. Preoperative dynamic and static lymphoscintigraphy were performed; both a vital blue dye and a gamma detection probe were used intraoperatively. Patients with tumour-positive SLNs received completion ALND or if no SLNs could be identified. All patients were monitored according to regional follow-up protocols. RESULTS: The SLNs were identified in 179 out of the 185 patients. In 73 patients the SLNs were tumour-positive and in 106 patients tumour-negative. The median follow-up was 35 months (range 17-59). In one SLN-negative patient an axillary recurrence occurred 26 months after the SLNB (false-negative rate: 1%). CONCLUSIONS: SLNB without ALND appears to be a safe procedure to ensure locoregional control in SLN-negative breast carcinoma, if carried out by an experienced team.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Development of 125I-methylene blue for sentinel lymph node biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is an established alternative to complete lymph node dissection in some patients. We have developed a novel, radiolabeled methylene blue dye that may be a useful alternative to the traditional two-step procedure involving 99mTc-labeled colloid and unlabeled blue dye. We hypothesize that 125I-labeled methylene blue will be rapidly absorbed into the lymphatics and transported to the drainage basin containing the sentinel nodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rabbits footpads were injected with 1 mCi of 125I-labeled methylene blue admixed with unlabeled dye. A hand-held gamma detection device allowed tracking of radiolabeled dye to nodes in the popliteal and inguinal regions. At pre-established time points animals were sacrificed, and the nodal basin dissected. Nodal radioactivity as well as uptake of blue dye was recorded. RESULTS: The spread of the radiolabeled methylene blue compound from the footpad to the popliteal lymph nodes occurred in 5-10 min. CONCLUSION: The radiolabeled dye rapidly progresses through lymphatics to the draining nodes. Use of radiolabeled methylene blue may be an attractive alternative to current two-step sentinel node techniques, as it may be less painful, and may reduce the cost associated with the time-delay between the injection of the radioactive compound and surgery.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Tumour thickness as a predictor of occult lymph node metastases in patients with stage I and II melanoma undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a minimally invasive procedure used accurately to stage nodal basins at risk of occult metastases. There are no data as yet to show a survival benefit from SLNB and its use remains controversial. If Breslow thickness of the tumour correlates well with positive SLNB, it could be used to select patients for SLNB. METHODS: A quantitative systematic review of published studies on SLNB in patients with melanoma available by September 2001 was performed. RESULTS: Twelve studies containing 4218 patients with stage I and II melanoma were identified; 17.8 (95 per cent confidence interval 16.7 to 19.0) per cent of patients had nodal micrometastases detected by SLNB. The incidence of micrometastasis in sentinel nodes correlated directly with Breslow tumour thickness; it was 1.0 per cent for lesions of less than or equal to 0.75 mm, 8.3 per cent for 0.76-1.50 mm, 22.7 per cent for 1.51-4.0 mm and 35.5 per cent for more than 4.0 mm. CONCLUSION: The Breslow thickness of primary melanoma predicts the presence of a sentinel node metastasis. The published data are not sufficient to demonstrate a correlation between other known prognostic indicators and a positive SLNB.

Humans↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: an indication for sentinel lymph node biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a minimally invasive, accurate method of evaluating axillary lymph nodes in patients with invasive cancer. The technique has also been applied successfully in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The purpose of this study was to review our experience performing SLNB in patients with a biopsy diagnosis of DCIS. METHODS: A prospective study of consecutive patients seen at our institution from August 2001 to April 2004 with a biopsy diagnosis of DCIS was undertaken. Demographic data, biopsy method, final pathology, and surgical treatment were recorded. Patients undergoing SLNB were identified, and pathologic results were noted. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients with a biopsy diagnosis of DCIS were treated. Fifty-five (64.7%) had their diagnosis made by excisional biopsy, and 30 (35.3%) by core biopsy. Forty-four (51.7%) patients underwent SLNB as part of their definitive surgical procedure, and an SLN was successfully identified in 41 (93.2%). Nine (22.0%) patients who underwent successful SLNB had a positive SLN, 2 by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and 7 by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for cytokeratin. Both patients with H&E-positive SLN were ultimately found to have invasive disease in their primary lesion. Final pathologic assessment of all primary lesions revealed invasive carcinoma in 7, 6 of whom had their diagnosis made by core biopsy. Overall, 20.0% of patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of DCIS were upstaged to invasive disease. Whether the lesion was palpable, grade and the presence or absence of necrosis were not significantly different in patients ultimately found to have invasive disease versus those who did not. DISCUSSION: Sentinel lymph node biopsy can be performed accurately in patients with a biopsy diagnosis of DCIS. The rate of axillary disease in patients with pure, completely resected DCIS is low; therefore, SLNB is not indicated in all patients with this biopsy diagnosis. Because of a high rate of invasive disease on the final pathology of patients with DCIS diagnosed by core biopsy, these patients should be offered SLNB.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Repeat operative sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Because sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy continues to be used for staging in patients with breast cancer, physicians treating these patients will be faced with in-breast recurrences and new primary breast cancers in the treated breast. Repeat operative SLN biopsy might be feasible in this clinical scenario. This report describes the case of a patient with an ipsilateral different-site, recurrent, infiltrating ductal carcinoma 14 months after lumpectomy; negative SLN biopsy result; and radiation therapy, now with a positive SLN biopsy result.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2003

[Risk of stage underestimation of breast cancer by sentinel lymph node biopsy method].

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is fast becoming the standard for testing lymph node involvement in many institutions. However questions remain as to stage underestimation. The aim of this study was to analyse this specific risk in a retrospective study. Between 1975 to 1999, 1,636 patients underwent a breast cancer excision and an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for 437 T0, 766 T1 or 433 T2 < or = 30 mm breast cancer without axillary lymph node involvement (NO). We analyse this population because of similar characteristics with SLN biopsy present indication. Node involvement rate was analysed regarding predictive factors of lymph node involvement (LNI): pathologic diameter, grading, peritumoral vascular embols, hormonal receptors, menopause and age. Risk of no adjuvant chemotherapy indication in case of SLN biopsy method using was analysed for pre and post menopaused women. Overall lymph node involvement was 27% (444/1,636): 17% for TO stage (74/437), 26% for T1 stage (202/766), 39% for T2 < or =30 mm stage (168/433). LNI was similar for ductai and lobular invasive breast cancer respectively 27,4% (308/1,125) and 24,3% (52/214). On the other hand LNI rate was sign lower for tubular, medullar and colloids cancers: 15% (20/155). Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis showed LNI significative predictive factors: vascular embols, grade III, age < or = 50 years, tumor diameter > 30 mm. Lymph node involvement rate was defined regarding grading, vascular embols and tumor diameter with increasing rate according to different sub-groups. Among pre-menopaused patients with a false negative rate of SLN of 5%, SLN biopsy without ALND give a specific risk of wrong non-adjuvant chemotherapy indication of 1,4 case/1,000. Among menopaused patients SLN biopsy without ALND give a specific risk of 0,93 cases/1,000. Expected LNI regarding major predictive factors (vascular embols, grading and tumor diameter) allows SLN biopsy risk/benefit evaluation in different sub-groups. SLN biopsy indication could he improved according these data which could be obtain pre-operatively by micro-biopsy.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2006

Survival outcomes in node-negative breast cancer patients evaluated with complete axillary node dissection versus sentinel lymph node biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy combined with microstaging-associated immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin more accurately assigns patients to their corresponding diagnostic stage. The purpose of this study was to compare the survival outcomes of node-negative patients who received an SLN biopsy with historical control data of node-negative patients who received routine complete axillary lymph node dissection (CALND) in the pre-SLN biopsy era. METHODS: Under institutional review board approval, 2458 node-negative invasive breast cancer patients between the ages of 25 and 94 years (mean, 60 years) were treated at our institution from January 1986 to May 2004. Of these 2458 patients, 604 (25%) were evaluated with CALND, whereas 1854 (75%) were evaluated with SLN biopsy. All were treated according to the current stage-specific guidelines. Kaplan-Meier graphs of overall survival and disease-free survival were constructed for each group of patients, and the two groups were compared by using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Overall survival and disease-free survival for the CALND and SLN biopsy groups did not differ significantly (P = .98). The average number of lymph nodes extracted in the pre-SLN biopsy group was 18, whereas the average number of SLNs extracted in the post-SLN biopsy group was 3. CONCLUSIONS: The survival rate among node-negative breast cancer patients who received an SLN biopsy alone has proven to have no significant difference (P = .98) from the survival rate among node-negative patients who received a CALND. SLN biopsy alone should replace CALND as the primary tool for axillary staging of breast cancer in node-negative patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Pathologic review of negative sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma patients with regional recurrence: a clinicopathologic study of 1152 patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy.

A sentinel lymph node (SLN) that is melanoma negative by pathologic examination implies absence of melanoma metastasis to that regional lymph node field. However, a small proportion of patients develop regional node field recurrence after a negative SLN biopsy. In this study, we reviewed the histopathology of negative SLNs from such patients to determine whether occult melanoma cells were present in the SLNs, to characterize the pathologic features of false-negative SLNs, and to provide recommendations for the histopathologic examination of these specimens. Between March 1992 and June 2001, of 1152 patients who had undergone SLN biopsy for primary melanomas at the Sydney Melanoma Unit, 976 were diagnosed with negative SLNs by initial pathologic examination (using 2 hematoxylin and eosin stained sections, and 2 immunostained sections for S-100 protein and HMB45), and follow-up was available in 957. Of these, 26 (2.7%) developed regional lymph node recurrence during a median follow-up period of 35.7 months. For 22 of them, the original slides and tissue blocks were available for reexamination. The original slides of each block were reviewed. Multiple further sections were cut from each block and stained with hematoxylin and eosin, for S-100, HMB45, and Melan A. Deposits of occult melanoma cells were detected in 7 of the 22 cases (31.8%). In 5 of the 7 cases, deposits of melanoma cells were present only in the recut sections. There were no significant differences in clinical and pathologic variables for those patients in whom occult melanoma cells were found by pathologic reexamination of their SLNs, compared with those in whom no melanoma cells were detected. The detection of melanoma cell deposits in only 7 of 22 false-negative SLNs suggests that mechanisms other than failure of histopathologic examination may contribute to the failure of the SLN biopsy technique in some patients. The failure rate for melanoma detection in SLNs by our routine pathologic examination, using the current protocol at our institution, was <1% (7 of 957 patients). Routinely performing more intensive histopathologic examination of SLNs is difficult to justify from a cost benefit perspective; we therefore recommend examining two hematoxylin and eosin stained sections and two immunostained sections (for S-100 and HMB45) routinely on SLNs from melanoma patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

[Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients--results and experience after 500 sentinel lymph node biopsies].

INTRODUCTION: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a widely used technique for axillary staging in breast cancer patients. The principle to evaluate the axillary status of a breast cancer patient with a less invasive surgery than axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) meets the new minimally invasive concept in breast cancer surgery. Some breast cancer centers proceed to SLNB without ALND in SLN-negative patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 1998 and March 2002, 500 SLNBs were performed. After a learning period with SLNB and ALND in 75 patients with a sensitivity of 96.2% and a false-negative rate of 3.8%, SLNB alone without further ALND was performed in a group of patients. In addition, the feasibility of SLNBin patients with locally advanced breast cancer, in patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and in patients with multicentricity was evaluated. The combined method with blue dye and technetium-99m-labeled human albumin for identification of SLNs was applied. RESULTS: 500 SLNBs were performed. The identification rate was 86.2%. After exclusion of patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and patients with multicentricity, the identification rate was 94.5%. SLNs were positive in 41.3% of patients and negative in 58.7% of patients. DISCUSSION: SLNB is an excellent method for axillary stag-ing and an alternative for ALND in a certain group of breast cancer patients.

Axilla↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Prognostic role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy was shown to be an accurate procedure in the study of axillary lymph nodes; it allowed a marked decrease in surgery-related morbidity of breast cancer and axillary dissection could be avoided. Other parameters as molecular markers, nuclear grading, patient age, tumor size, are not able to predict the axillary lymph node status and consequent local therapeutic approach similar to those provided by sentinel lymph node biopsy. The extent of sentinel lymph node metastatic involvement, the extracapsular spread, the size of primary tumor and peritumoral lymphatic/vascular infiltration are the four characteristics shown to be significant, if considered in association and not separately as predictors of the extent of axillary involvement in presence of a positive sentinel lymph node. However, so far, specific studies did not confirm concordant and reproducible results. Therefore, apart from controlled studies, axillary dissection is always required in presence of a metastatic sentinel lymph node.

Axilla↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy with blue dye alone in breast cancer patients with excisional biopsy.

PURPOSE: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) appears to offer an excellent alternative method to routine axillary lymph node dissection for staging patients with breast cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of excisional biopsy on identification and false negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy with blue dye alone in breast cancer patients with clinically negative axilla. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From March 1998 to March 2003, 266 consecutive sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNB) were performed using isosulfan blue dye alone. Patients were divided into two groups. One hundred and four patients (39.1%) had previously undergone an excisional biopsy (Group I); in 162 patients (60.9%), pre-operative diagnosis was obtained by either fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) or core biopsy (Group II). Following sentinel lymph node biopsy, all patients had axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Data concerning patients, sentinel lymph nodes and the status of the axilla were collected and compared using Fisher's exact test. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The sentinel lymph node was successfully identified by blue dye in 94.3% (251/266) of patients. Mean lymph nodes removed from the axilla was 19 (range 11-36) and the mean number of sentinel nodes was 2 (range 1-5). The identification and false negative rate were unrelated to size, type or location of the tumour, or a previous surgical biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: SLNB with blue dye for evaluation of the axilla is a rapid and accurate technique that provides increased efficacy in the detection of lymphatic metastasis when careful pathologic evaluation with serial sections is performed. The risk-benefit analysis of lymphatic mapping with blue dye provides improvement in staging, with reduced morbidity and hospital stay, and the elimination of general anaesthesia. The technique may also be used safely and accurately in breast cancer patients with excisional biopsy.

Biopsy, Needle↗
PubMed2000

Management of malignant melanoma of the head and neck using dynamic lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy.

BACKGROUND: The sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is revolutionizing the surgical management of primary malignant melanoma. It allows accurate nodal staging, and targets patients who may benefit from regional lymphadenectomy and systemic therapy; however, its use in the management of head and neck melanoma has not been widely accepted. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients treated for clinical stages I and II malignant melanoma of the head and neck with dynamic lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe-guided SLN biopsy. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (47 male and 11 female) were identified. Primary melanoma sites included the scalp (21), ear (8), face (13), neck (15), and eyelid (1). Primary tumor staging was T2 (11), T3 (24), and T4 (23). Dynamic lymphoscintigraphy visualized SLNs in 57 patients (98.3%). In 43 cases (75%) a single draining nodal basin was identified, and in 14 cases there were multiple draining nodal basins. Sentinel lymph nodes were successfully identified in 72 (96%) of 75 nodal basins. Positive SLNs were identified in 10 patients (17.5%). Sentinal lymph node positivity by tumor staging was T3, 16.7% and T4, 27.3%. Completion lymphadenectomy revealed residual disease in 3 patients (30%). Relapse occurred in 10 (21.3%) of the 47 patients with negative SLN biopsy results and 7 (70%) of those with positive results. CONCLUSIONS: Gamma probe-guided SLN localization in the head and neck region was successful in 96% of draining nodal basins. It can target regional lymphadenectomy in patients who may benefit from regional nodal dissection.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Identifying risk factors for complications following sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy has become routine in the staging of patients with cutaneous melanoma and is presumed to have fewer complications than elective regional lymph node dissection (RLND). However, little information is available to refute or support this assumption. HYPOTHESIS: Risk factors for complications following sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNBX) can be identified. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of 339 consecutive patients undergoing SLNBX for melanoma between 1996 and 2003 at our institution were reviewed for complications. RESULTS: In our series of 339 patients, 20 complications (5.9%) were observed following SLNBX compared with 15 (19.5%) of 77 patients undergoing RLND during the same period (P<.001). Seroma formation, transient nerve injuries, and minor wound infections were the most frequently observed complications in patients undergoing SLNBX. In contrast, chronic lymphedema and wound infections were the most frequent complications observed in patients undergoing RLND. Patients with comorbid medical conditions had more complications following either SLNBX or RLND than those without. The number of lymph nodes excised and the placement of closed-suction drainage were associated with an increased incidence of complications following SLNBX but not RLND. The incidence of annual complications inversely correlated with the cumulative number of SLNBXs performed during this period. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy can be performed with a low incidence of complications. Experience with SLNBX decreases complications. Patients with more than 1 sentinel lymph node excised or a closed-suction drain placed at the time of SLNBX are at an increased risk of complications.

Chi-Square Distribution↗
PubMed2000

[Feasibility and accuracy of the combined radioisotope and blue-dye guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer].

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a minimally invasive operation for staging regional lymph nodes in breast cancer. This method was introduced in the last decade. However there are some remaining questions regarding labelling, surgical technique, indications, and the pathological examination of the removed sentinel lymph nodes which have to be answered before can be introduced as the routine clinical practice. 98 patients with primary breast cancer underwent double guided (radioisotope and blue-dye) sentinel lymph node biopsy in our department during a surgical feasibility study between December 1997 and February 2000. The operation was successful in 92 patients (94%). False negative rate, sensitivity and accuracy were 15%, 85% and 95% retrospectively. During the learning curve the success rate improved from 83% to 99%, the sensitivity from 79% to 89% and the accuracy from 88% to 97% and the false negative rate decreased from 21% to 11%. In T1 tumors the false negative rate and accuracy were 6% and 98%, while in T2 tumors these were 24% and 86%. Application of a larger particle sized colloid (200-600 nm), subareolar injection and next day operation technique had no effects on the results. Double guided sentinel lymph node biopsy is a sensitive surgical staging procedure which accurately predicts the lymph node status in T1 breast tumors. The technique used by us is easy to reproduce, and learn and is beneficial in technical and radiation protection aspects.

Adult↗