PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Skin Irritancy Tests”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

A strategy for skin irritation testing.

Skin irritation safety testing and risk assessment for new products, and the ingredients they contain, is a critical requirement before market introduction. In the past, much of this skin testing required the use of experimental animals. However, new current best approaches for skin corrosion and skin irritation testing and risk assessment are being defined, obviating the need for animal test methods. Several in vitro skin corrosion test methods have been endorsed after successful validation and are gaining acceptance by regulatory authorities. In vitro test methods for acute, cumulative (repeat exposure), and chronic (prolonged exposure) skin irritation are under development. Though not yet validated, many are being used successfully for testing and risk assessment purposes as documented through an expanding literature. Likewise, a novel acute irritation patch test in human subjects is providing a valid and ethical alternative to animal testing for prediction of chemical skin irritation potential. An array of other human test methods also have been developed and used for the prediction of cumulative/chronic skin irritation and the general skin compatibility of finished products. The development of instrumental methods (e.g., transepidermal water loss, capacitance, and so on) has provided the means for analyzing various biophysical properties of human skin and changes in these properties caused by exposure to irritants. However, these methods do not directly measure skin inflammation. A recently introduced skin surface tape sampling procedure has been shown to detect changes in skin surface cytokine recovery that correlate with inflammatory skin changes associated with chemical irritant exposures or existing dermatitis. It holds promise for more objective quantification of skin irritation events, including subclinical (sensory) irritation, in the future.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗

Co-occurring words and retrieval efficiency: finding information about alternatives to animal testing in relation to skin irritation testing.

Words appearing in abstracts of scientific articles are often useful as search terms, particularly those words and word patterns that are unique to the relevant field of endeavour. In view of the heightened interest in obtaining information about alternatives to animal testing, efforts directed toward enhancing retrieval of pertinent references from the biomedical literature are warranted. Words and phrases, and word-phrase co-occurrences describing methods of experimentation in abstracts about alternatives to skin-irritation testing in animals, were evaluated with regard to retrieval efficiency in the National Library of Medicine database, Toxline(. Precision of retrieval was defined as the number of pertinent references found in the total number of citations retrieved. Retrieval precision values ranged from 0.25% to 100%.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗

Utility of MTT assay in three-dimensional cultured human skin model as an alternative for draize skin irritation test: approach using diffusion law of irritant in skin and toxicokinetics-toxicodynamics correlation.

PURPOSE: A cytotoxicity assay using a three-dimensional cultured human skin model, Living Skin Equivalent-high (LSE-high) was evaluated as an alternative to the Draize skin irritation tests using animals. A relation between the cytotoxicity and calculated concentration of an irritant in skin was also evaluated. METHODS: Colorimetric thiazoyl blue (MTT) conversion assay and a surfactant, cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), were selected as a cytotoxicity assay and a model irritant. The fraction of dead cell number in the MTT assay or the Draize irritation score (in vitro and in vivo irritation data, respectively) was treated as a function of CPC concentration in the viable skin of LSE-high and guinea pig. Separately, in vitro permeations of CPC through the LSE-high or excised guinea pig skin were determined to calculate the average concentration of CPC in the viable skin using the Fickian diffusion theory. The obtained relations between the irritation scores and CPC concentration were evaluated by the Emax model (Hill equation). RESULTS: CPC concentration showing 50% irritation (IC50) was similar for the MTT assay (18.9%) and Draize test (12.3%), and a good relationship (r = 0.981) was observed between the fraction of dead cell number and the Draize score. In contrast, IC50, 1.32%, for the MTT assay in LSE-high was much lower than that using guinea pig skin. We then corrected the results for the MTT assay using a ratio of IC50 in guinea pig skin against LSE-high, resulting in a good relation between both MTT results in guinea pig skin and LSE-high. CONCLUSION: The present results suggest that the MTT assay using LSE-high may be utilized as an alternative for the Draize test in animals for evaluating skin irritation.

Animals↗

Comments on the LD50 and acute eye and skin irritation tests. The Animals in Research Committee of the Society of Toxicology and approved by the SOT Council.

Conduct of any form of testing of potentially hazardous materials in animals, including lethality or eye and skin irritation testing, should be undertaken only after careful consideration of the necessity for, the objectives behind, and the possible alternatives to, such testing. Acute toxicity testing to determine an approximate lethal dose provides a basis for a comparison of the relative toxicities of different materials. These data are used to classify materials for transportation and labeling, to provide information for treatment of acute intoxications, to aid in dose selection for subsequent toxicity studies, and to provide comparison data for evaluation and validation of alternative methods in toxicology. Although the classical LD50 test provides a general estimate of the quantity of chemical likely to cause death, much of the same information can be provided by other forms of testing in which significantly fewer number of animals are employed. Acute eye and skin irritation tests on chemical substances are conducted in order to characterize the hazards associated with ocular or dermal exposure. At present, tests in intact animals are the only means of assessing the potential hazard from such exposure other than direct testing in man. Although validated in vitro alternatives to eye and skin irritation tests in animals are not available currently, many tests under development show promise and may be useful as initial screening techniques. Complete validation of these alternate forms of testing for irritation may reduce the need to use whole animals. Until these procedures have been thoroughly tested and validated, the investigator will have to rely on conventional methods.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

In vitro skin irritation testing on reconstituted human epidermis: reproducibility for 50 chemicals tested with two protocols.

Since it is of high importance to establish the skin irritation potential of industrial chemicals, toxicologists developed tests on various skin models. Most test data come from the rabbit Draize test, but its reproducibility is questionable. Some human in vivo test data exist, but they concern only few compounds. The emergence of new tools such as reconstituted human skin tissues offers a promising future to alternative methods. We describe here two in vitro skin irritation test protocols performed on reconstituted human epidermis. One is a direct topical application test and the other an in vitro patch test. Both protocols were performed using multiple endpoint analysis including cell viability (MTT reduction), histology, and IL-1alpha release. Fifty chemicals were tested: 20 compounds were used in the ECVAM pre-validation study and 30 products were previously tested in a human in vivo patch test. These in vitro skin irritation tests have not only the advantages of enhanced convenience and of reduced costs, but a good reproducibility is observed by endpoint, and by compound. A prediction model is proposed to classify the chemicals as irritant or non-irritant, and the results are compared to available rabbit and human data. We do not wish to overgeneralize from these 50 compounds; but, instead suggest that this data set be extensively extended to include chemicals of varying physico-chemical properties.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗

Optimisation of the EpiDerm test protocol for the upcoming ECVAM validation study on in vitro skin irritation tests.

An ECVAM-funded prevalidation study (PV) was conducted during 1999 and 2000 to identify in vitro tests capable of reliably distinguishing between skin irritants (I) and non-irritants (NI) according to European Union risk phrases ("R38" or no classification). The tests evaluated were EpiDerm, EPISKIN, PREDISKIN, the non-perfused pig ear method, and the mouse skin integrity function test (SIFT). Whereas reproducibility of the two human skin model tests and SIFT was acceptable, none of the methods was deemed ready to enter a formal validation study due to their low predictivity. The ECVAM Skin Irritation Task Force therefore suggested improvements of protocols and prediction models for these tests. Furthermore, it was agreed that experience gained with the two human-skin models be shared, and a common protocol should be developed for EpiDerm and EPISKIN (Zuang et al., 2002). When we applied an improved EPISKIN protocol (Portes et al., 2002) to the EpiDerm model, an acceptable specificity (80%) was achieved, whereas the sensitivity (60%) was far too low. In 2003, the EPISKIN protocol was further refined by extension of the post-incubation period following chemical exposure. In the current study, we evaluated this EPISKIN refinement by applying it to EpiDerm. In addition, we developed technical improvements for the application of the test chemicals and rinsing procedure, which reduced the variability of results and increased the percentage of correct predictions. A set of twenty non-coded reference substances from the ECVAM prevalidation study phase III (Fentem et al., 2001) was tested with the final protocol in three independent runs. Both high sensitivity (80%) and high specificity (78%) were achieved, and the statistical probability of correct classifications was high, so that the test is now regarded ready for formal validation.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗

The EpiDerm test protocol for the upcoming ECVAM validation study on in vitro skin irritation tests--an assessment of the performance of the optimised test.

During the past decade, several validation studies have been conducted on in vitro methods for discriminating between skin irritating and non-irritating chemicals. The reconstructed human skin models, EpiDerm and EPISKIN, provided the most promising results. Based on experience of the similar performance of the two skin models, it was suggested that a common test protocol and prediction model should be developed for the prediction of skin irritation potential with the two models. When the EPISKIN protocol was applied with the EpiDerm model, an acceptable specificity (80%) was achieved, whereas the sensitivity (60%) was low. In 2003, the EPISKIN protocol was further refined by extending the post-incubation period following exposure to test chemicals. This extension and additional technical improvements to the EpiDerm protocol were evaluated with 19 chemicals from the prevalidation study. With the new test design, high sensitivity (80%) and specificity (78%) were obtained. The statistical probability for correct classifications was high, so the test was considered to be ready for formal validation. However, since test optimisation had been conducted with the same test chemicals as were used in the ECVAM prevalidation study, it was decided that the optimisation of the protocol had to be verified with a new set of chemicals. Thus, in the current study, 26 additional chemicals (10 rabbit irritants and 16 non-irritants), which had previously been selected and tested by LOREAL with EPISKIN, were evaluated in three independent experiments with EpiDerm. With this unbalanced testing set, a specificity of 94%, and a sensitivity of 60% were obtained, while the positive and negative predictivity and accuracy remained almost unchanged (around 80%) in comparison to the in vivo rabbit data. Overall, 45 chemicals (20 irritants and 25 non-irritants) were tested according to the final protocol. The resulting high positive (82%) and negative predictive values (79%) confirmed the reliability (accuracy of 80%) of the improved test protocol of the EpiDerm model.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗

Skin irritation testing in rabbits complicated by dermal mucormycosis.

Two insecticide formulations were evaluated for skin irritation using albino rabbits (Stauffland-White strain). While the active ingredient alone produced only mild skin irritation, corn grit formulation produced severe skin irritation. Corn grit from three sources (A, B, and C) was similarly evaluated for skin irritation and at 24 hr, all samples produced erythema and edema of both the abraded and nonabraded test sites. Eschar was observed in 72 hr in about half of the rabbits and persisted through termination on the 7th day. Histologic examination of skin specimens revealed that all three corn grit samples produced epidermatitis. In addition, rabbits exposed to corn grit from two sources (A and B), developed moderate focal to severe diffuse suppurative necrotizing folliculitis and dermatitis. Large tubular branching nonseptate hyphae compatible with the Mucorales species were seen in hair follicle micropustules of rabbits treated with corn grit from sources A and B. Mycologic culture techniques applied to corn grit from each source revealed a potential pathogen in the genus Rhizopus isolated from samples from sources A and C but not B. The skin irritation test involved application of test material covered with gauze to both abraded and nonabraded skin. Rubber damming was placed over the gauze and secured with tape. After 24-hr exposure all bandaging and visible test material were removed. Skin irritation was evaluated immediately after removal and then periodically until termination at 7 days.

Animals↗

Skin irritation testing in man for hazard assessment--evaluation of four patch systems.

1. The limitations of the Draize rabbit skin irritation test for hazard evaluation for man are widely documented. Nevertheless it remains the prescribed method for determining acute skin irritations hazard. 2. While the use of human testing for risk assessment of irritants is well established, the use of predictive testing in man for hazard identification has not been explored widely, and this is the object of the research programme. 3. The experiment described in this report evaluates the sensitivity of four patch testing systems (Finn chamber, Hill Top patch, Van der Bend chamber, and Webril patch) using a total of six irritant substances. 4. Following preliminary range-finding experiments, test materials were applied to the upper outer arm for up to 4 h. Assessments were performed immediately after patch removal and at 1, 24, 48, and 72 h. 5. Webril and Hill Top patches generated the greatest levels of response, although responses with Finn and Van der Bend were observed. Hill Top patches are recommended for future development work. 6. The use of very small preliminary panels to predict the effects in larger panels using different volunteers was only of limited value as each volunteer was found to have different irritant thresholds.

Acetates↗

Keratinocyte-derived proinflammatory key mediators and cell viability as in vitro parameters of irritancy: a possible alternative to the Draize skin irritation test.

This study is aimed at the development of a cell culture assay which may supplement or replace the animal Draize skin irritancy test. Using human keratinocytes, the measurement of proinflammatory eicosanoid and interleukin-1 alpha release and of the impairment of cell viability have provided a suitable in vitro/in vivo correlation for at least three surfactants. The in vitro study has been extended using structurally unrelated, pharmacologically relevant compounds including ethanol, glycerol, cyclohexanol, acetone, benzoic acid, phenol, acrylamide, triethanolamine, Tween 80, sodium dodecyl sulfate, benzalkonium chloride, NiSO4, SnCl2, and ZnCl2. Time- and dose-response studies were used to establish half-maximal stimulatory (SC50) and inhibitory (IC50) as well as 10-fold stimulatory (ED10) concentrations for arachidonic acid release, cytotoxicity, and IL-1 alpha release, respectively. Based upon these values a similar ranking has been obtained for the mildly acting acetone, ethanol, glycerol, and Tween 80 and for the severely acting A23187, benzalkonium chloride, and sodium dodecyl sulfate. With respect to all other test compounds, substantial variation occurred indicating that all three test parameters provide a more complete characterization of the test compound's potency than a single endpoint. These data are ready to be validated by a controlled clinical study aimed at a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the symptoms of skin inflammation in volunteers.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗

Reproducibility of a non-invasive skin irritancy test in a cohort of metalworker trainees.

The identification of subjects with increased susceptibility to irritants may play an important rôle in the prevention of irritant contact dermatitis. A short and quick method of non-invasive testing for assessing irritant sensitivity was developed by Wilhelm and coworkers in 1990, based on the alkali resistance test of Burckhardt. In order to determine the reproducibility of this screening method, 204 healthy metalworker trainees were tested 2 x according to Wilhelm within an interval of 6 months. No statistically-significant correlation could be shown, indicating that the reproducibility of this screening method is low. Therefore, we propose applying not just a single test for the assessment of skin irritability, but a series of tests, in order to improve the reliability of this kind of testing.

Adolescent↗

Rat epidermal keratinocyte organotypic culture (ROC) as a model for chemically induced skin irritation testing.

The potential of rat epidermal keratinocyte (REK) organotypic culture (ROC) with proper stratum corneum barrier as a model for screening skin irritants was evaluated. The test chemicals were selected from ECETOC database (1995) and the observed in vitro irritation potential was compared to ECETOC in vivo primary irritation index (PII), to EU risk phrases, and to the harmonized OECD criteria. Chemicals were applied onto the stratum corneum surface of ROC for 30 min and samples were taken from the underlying medium at 4 and 8 h after exposure. Cell membrane integrity (determined by LDH assay) and pro-inflammatory effect (determined by IL-1alpha release) were verified at both time points and correlated to PII values. The best correlation (R(2) = 0.831) was seen with LDH leakage test. Based on obtained data, chemicals were classified according to criteria defined by EU and OECD. From 12 chemicals, only two were incorrectly classified according to OECD criteria when using LDH leakage and IL-1alpha release as irritation markers. At the end of experiment, chemical-treated ROC cultures were fixed and histological changes were assessed. Typical signs for irritation were lightly stained cytoplasm, condensed nuclei, cellular vacuolization, eosinophilic cytoplasms, and blebbing. These irritation effects of chemicals were graded visually into four classes (A-D). The extent of morphological perturbations of the cultures mostly correlated with PII. The present results indicate the validity of the ROC model in predicting skin irritation potential of chemicals and show that the use of set of irritation markers with different mechanistic responses gives more information on irritation than if only one marker was used.

Animals↗

Evaluation of a non-invasive human and an in vitro cytotoxicity method as alternatives to the skin irritation test on rabbits.

5 substances were investigated for their primary irritant effect by means of different protocols. The cutaneous blood flow values (CBFV) were measured in humans: in a 1st series of experiments 12 h after application of the pure substances for 48 h and in a 2nd series of experiments 1, 24, 48 and 72 h after application of the 10% diluted substances (subclinical concentration) for 3 h. Rabbit skin erythema scores were obtained 1, 24, 48 and 72 h after application of the undiluted substances for 4 h. The uridine uptake inhibition assay on KB cells was included as a cytotoxicity test. Results obtained for both protocols on humans are compared with each other and with the test data obtained on rabbits, and with the cytotoxicity data. Application of the undiluted substances for 48 h on human skin or for only 3 h at a 10% dilution resulted in the same ranking between the substances. The CBFV in the human correlated very well (r = 0.99) with erythema scores obtained on rabbits. A poor correlation was observed between the in vitro and the in vivo results. From this study, it can be concluded that CBFV measurement is a valid method for the detection of erythema at subclinical concentrations.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗

A prevalidation study on the in vitro skin irritation function test (SIFT) for prediction of acute skin irritation in vivo: results and evaluation of ECVAM Phase III.

A prevalidation study sponsored by the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation is aimed at identifying non-animal tests capable of discriminating irritants (I) from non-irritants (NI), as defined according to European Union and OECD. This paper reports on Phase III for one of the methods, the skin integrity function test (SIFT), assessing the protocol performance of the SIFT, in terms of reproducibility and predictive ability, in three laboratories. The barrier function properties of excised mouse skin were determined using a set of 20 coded chemicals (10 I, 10 NI), using the endpoints of trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL) and electrical resistance (ER). The basis of the SIFT prediction model is if the ratios of the pre- and post-application values for either TEWL or ER are greater than five-fold, then the test chemical is deemed irritant (I). If the ratio of both parameters is less than five-fold then the chemical is deemed non-irritant (NI). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that the intra-lab reproducibility was acceptable but that the inter-lab reproducibility was not. Overall, the SIFT test under-predicted the irritancy of the test chemicals chosen for Phase III with an overall accuracy of only 55%. The sensitivity value (ability to correctly predict I) was only 30%. The specificity (ability to predict NI) of the test was better at 80%. A retrospective examination of the SIFT results was undertaken using Student's t-test and a significance level of P<0.05 to predict an irritant based on changes in the TEWL ratio values. This improved the predictivity of the SIFT test, giving a specificity of 60%, a sensitivity of 80% and an overall accuracy of 70%. Appropriate modifications to the prediction model have now been made and the SIFT will be re-examined in a new validation exercise to investigate the potential of this non-animal method to predict acute skin irritation potential.

Animals↗