SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Sparsomycin”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1984

Structure-activity relationships of sparsomycin and its analogues. Octylsparsomycin: the first analogue more active than sparsomycin.

Nine analogues of sparsomycin were synthesized, and their cytostatic activity was studied in an in vitro clonogenic L1210 assay by measuring the inhibition of colony formation. The activity of an analogue, expressed as an ID50 value, was compared to that of sparsomycin. Each possesses not more than two structural modifications of the sparsomycin molecule 1. Comparison of the activity of with that of the stereomers, having RCSS, SCSS, and RCRS chirality, respectively, shows that the S configuration of the chiral carbon atom is essential for an optimal activity, whereas the R chirality of the sulfoxide sulfur atom of sparsomycin is of importance. Study of the ID50 values of the S-deoxo analogues, as well as the compounds having the beta-sulfoxide function, indicate that the presence of an oxygen atom on the alpha-sulfur atom is essential. Isomerization of the trans double bond into the cis double bond yields isosparsomycin, (Scheme II), which has a low activity. The cytostatic activity of sparsomycin seems to be related to its lipophilicity: octylsparsomycin was shown to be three times as effective as sparsomycin.

Animals↗

PubMed1996

Sparsomycin and its analogues: a new approach for evaluating their potency as inhibitors of peptide bond formation.

The ability of several sparsomycin analogues to inhibit peptide bond formation was studied in vitro. Peptide bonds are formed between puromycin (S) and the acetylPhe-tRNA of acetylPhe-tRNA/70 S ribosome/poly(U) complex (complex C), according to the puromycin reaction: [formula: see text] It was shown that the sparsomycin analogues, like sparsomycin itself, inhibit peptide bond formation in a time-dependent manner; they react with complex C according to the equation [formula: see text] where C*I is a conformationally altered species in which I is bound more tightly than in CI. The determination of the rate constant k(7) for the regeneration of complex C from the C*I complex allows evaluation of these analogues as inhibitors of peptide bond formation. According to their k7 values, these analogues are classified in order of descending potency as follows: n-pentyl-sparsomycin (4) > n-butyl-sparsomycin (3) approximately n-butyl-deshydroxy-sparsomycin (6) > benzyl-sparsomycin (2) > deshydroxy-sparsomycin (5) approximately sparsomycin (1) > n-propyl-desthio-deshydroxy-sparsomycin (7). The analogues with an aromatic or a larger hydrophobic side chain are stronger inhibitors of the puromycin reaction than are those with a smaller side chain or those lacking the bivalent sulfur atoms; replacement of the hydroxymethyl group with a methyl group does not affect the position of the compound in this ranking; compare the positions of compounds 1 and 3 with those of 5 and 6. In the case of compound 7, C*I adsorbed on cellulose nitrate disks was not sufficiently stable to allow examination by the method applied to the other analogues, probably due to a relatively large value of k7. This analogue showed also time-dependent inhibition, but after the isomerization of CI to C*I, the kinetics of inhibition become complex, and C*I interacted further with puromycin, either as C*I or after its dissociation to C*.

Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗

PubMed1987

Pharmacokinetics and toxicology of sparsomycin in beagle dogs.

Sparsomycin is a cytotoxic drug exhibiting a broad spectrum of in vitro activity against murine tumors and many tumor cell lines. It also appears to be a potent stimulator of the antitumor activity of cisplatin against L1210 leukemia in vivo. However, because of its toxicity, the antitumor activity of sparsomycin on murine tumors in vivo has been disappointing. The purpose of our study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics of this drug as well as the possible mechanisms that produce sparsomycin toxicity. Tests on beagle dogs revealed that about 60% of the drug is eliminated by metabolic clearance, while 40% is eliminated by the kidneys. After a single bolus injection of 0.1 mg/kg sparsomycin without narcosis, sparsomycin was eliminated with a t beta 1/2 of 0.6-0.7 h, the AUC being 0.32-0.38 mg.h.l-1, and the volume of distribution (Vd) 0.26 l/kg. In addition to being subject to glomerular filtration, sparsomycin is probably also actively excreted and actively reabsorbed by the renal tubuli. Sparsomycin itself may inhibit its active tubular excretion, thus resulting in a decrease in the drug's renal clearance and its accumulation in the plasma. Sparsomycin appeared to be toxic primarily in the liver, disturbing its function and the synthesis of plasma proteins. Two out of five dogs developed hemorrhagic diathesis due to hypofibrinogenemia and deficiency of other blood-coagulation factors. Sparsomycin was not toxic to the bone marrow.

Animals↗

PubMed1991

Biochemical and kinetic characteristics of the interaction of the antitumor antibiotic sparsomycin with prokaryotic and eukaryotic ribosomes.

Using 125I-labeled phenol-alanine sparsomycin, an analogue of sparsomycin having higher biological activity than the unmodified antibiotic, we studied the requirements and the characteristics of its interaction with the ribosome. The drug does not bind to either isolated ribosomal subunits or reconstituted whole ribosomes. For sparsomycin binding to 70S and 80S ribosomes, the occupation of the peptidyltransferase P-site by an N-blocked aminoacyl-tRNA is a definitive requirement. The sparsomycin analogue binds to bacterial and yeast ribosomes with Ka values of around 10(6) M-1 and 0.6 x 10(6) M-1, respectively, but its affinity is probably affected by the character of the peptidyl-tRNA bound to the P-site. Chloramphenicol, lincomycin, and 16-atom ring macrolides compete with sparsomycin for binding to bacterial ribosomes, but streptogramins and 14-atom ring macrolides do not. Considering the reported low affinity of puromycin for bacterial ribosomes, this antibiotic is also a surprisingly good competitor of sparsomycin binding to these particles. In the case of yeast ribosomes, blasticidin is a relatively good competitor of sparsomycin interaction, but anisomycin, trichodermin, and narciclasin are not. As expected, puromycin is a poor competitor of the binding in this case. The results from competition studies carried out with different sparsomycin analogues reveal, in some cases, a discrepancy between the drug ribosomal affinity and its biological effects. This suggests that some intermediate step, perhaps a ribosomal conformational change, is required for the inhibition to take place.

Binding, Competitive↗

PubMed2006

Rapid propagation of low-fitness drug-resistant mutants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by a streptococcal metabolite sparsomycin.

Here we report that sparsomycin, a streptococcal metabolite, enhances the replication of HIV-1 in multiple human T cell lines at a concentration of 400 nM. In addition to wild-type HIV-1, sparsomycin also accelerated the replication of low-fitness, drug-resistant mutants carrying either D30N or L90M within HIV-1 protease, which are frequently found mutations in HIV-1-infected patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Of particular interest was that replication enhancement appeared profound when HIV-1 such as the L90M-carrying mutant displayed relatively slower replication kinetics. The presence of sparsomycin did not immediately select the fast-replicating HIV-1 mutants in culture. In addition, sparsomycin did not alter the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of antiretroviral drugs directed against HIV-1 including nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (lamivudine and stavudine), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (nevirapine) and protease inhibitors (nelfinavir, amprenavir and indinavir). The IC50s of both zidovudine and lopinavir against multidrug resistant HIV-1 in the presence of sparsomycin were similar to those in the absence of sparsomycin. The frameshift reporter assay and Western blot analysis revealed that the replication-boosting effect was partly due to the sparsomycin's ability to increase the -1 frameshift efficiency required to produce the Gag-Pol transcript. In conclusion, the use of sparsomycin should be able to facilitate the drug resistance profiling of the clinical isolates and the study on the low-fitness viruses.

Cells, Cultured↗

PubMed1998

Kinetics of inhibition of rabbit reticulocyte peptidyltransferase by anisomycin and sparsomycin.

A detailed kinetic study was carried out on the inhibitory mechanisms of two eukaryotic peptidyltransferase drugs (I), anisomycin and sparsomycin. In an in vitro system from rabbit reticulocytes, AcPhe-puromycin is produced in a pseudo-first-order reaction from the preformed AcPhe-tRNA/poly(U)/80S ribosome complex (complex C) and excess puromycin (S). This reaction is inhibited by anisomycin and sparsomycin through different mechanisms. Anisomycin acts as a mixed noncompetitive inhibitor. The product, AcPhe-puromycin, is derived only from C according to the puromycin reaction. On the other hand, sparsomycin reacts with complex C in a two-step reaction, [REACTION; SEE TEXT] An initial rapid binding of the drug produces the encounter complex CI. During this step and before conversion of CI to C*I, sparsomycin behaves as a competitive inhibitor. The rapidly produced CI is isomerized slowly to a conformationally altered species C*I in which I is bound more tightly. The rate constants of this step are k6 = 2.1 min-1 and k7 = 0.095 min-1. Moreover, the low value of the association rate constant k7/Ki' (2 x 10(5) M-1 sec-1), provides insight into the rates of possible conformational changes occurring during protein synthesis and supports the proposal that sparsomycin is the first example of a slow-binding inhibitor of eukaryotic peptidyltransferase. When complex C is preincubated with concentrations of sparsomycin of >8 Ki and then reacts with a mixture of puromycin and sparsomycin, the inhibition becomes linear mixed noncompetitive and involves C*I instead of CI. During this phase, AcPhe-puromycin is produced from a new, modified ribosomal complex with a lower catalytic rate constant. Thus, sparsomycin also acts as a modifier of eukaryotic peptidyltransferase activity.

Animals↗

PubMed1996

Mutations in the peptidyl transferase center of 23 S rRNA reveal the site of action of sparsomycin, a universal inhibitor of translation.

Sparsomycin is a universal and powerful inhibitor of peptide bond formation which, in contrast to many other ribosome-targeted antibiotics, does not produce footprints on rRNA. A mutant of an archaeon Halobacterium halobium has been isolated that exhibits resistance to sparsomycin. Resistant cells possessed a mutation in the 23 S rRNA, where C2518 (C2499 in Escherichia coli) was substituted by U. Introduction of the C2518U mutation into the chromosomal 23 S rRNA gene of wild-type H. halobium rendered cells resistant to sparsomycin, demonstrating that a single nucleotide alteration in the rRNA is sufficient to confer resistance. Accordingly, ribosomes containing mutant 23 S rRNA exhibited increased tolerance to sparsomycin in vitro. Mutations of two other nucleotide positions in the peptidyl transferase center, C2471 and U2519 (C2452 and U2500 in E. coli), conferred resistance to low concentrations of sparsomycin. The location of the sparsomycin resistance mutations reveals the possible site of drug binding and/or action. Our findings provide further support for the idea that rRNA may be directly involved in interaction with antibiotics and the catalysis of the peptide bond formation.

Base Sequence↗

PubMed1987

Structure-activity relationships of sparsomycin and its analogues. Inhibition of peptide bond formation in cell-free systems and of L1210 and bacterial cell growth.

The biological activity of 14 analogues of sparsomycin (1) was studied in cell-free systems of Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Sulfolobus solfataricus by measuring the inhibition of protein synthesis. The inhibition of L1210 colony formation in soft agar and bacterial cell growth in solid as well as in liquid medium was also examined. Each analogue possesses not more than two structural modifications of the sparsomycin molecule. This enabled us to determine unambiguously several structural and stereochemical features that are required for an optimal biological activity in these assays. Sparsomycin, having the SCRS chirality, is the most potent of the four possible stereoisomers. The results obtained with compounds 5-7 indicate that the presence of an oxygen atom on the S (alpha) atom is essential. Substitution of the bivalent sulfur atom by a CH2 group (10) or of the SCH3 moiety by a Cl atom (12) affects the activity of the molecule partially. Compound 12 is surprisingly active against intact cells. Substitution of the C(6)-CH3 group by a H(14) reduces the activity of the molecule. Isomerization of the trans double bond into the cis double bond yields cis-sparsomycin (15), which is inactive. The hydrophobic derivatives 8, 9, and 11 are considerably more active than sparsomycin; thus the ribosomal binding site for sparsomycin may have a hydrophobic character.

Animals↗

PubMed1983

Determination of sparsomycin in plasma and urine of the dog by means of reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and first pharmacokinetic results.

Sparsomycin--an antibiotic with marked cytostatic activity--was the subject of a clinical Phase I study in 1964. The structure of sparsomycin was elucidated in 1970 and its first total synthesis was reported in 1981. Here we describe a sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic method of determination. The detection limit was found to be 10 ng/ml of plasma and 20 ng/ml of urine. With this procedure sparsomycin and isosparsomycin can readily be separated. In addition, we performed a first pharmacokinetic study in the dog and found a half-life time t1/2 beta of 1.1 h. Only 25% of the administered dose could be recovered in the urine as sparsomycin. We consider that by now many prerequisites for further preclinical studies have been achieved, and the results of these studies will determine whether sparsomycin deserves reintroduction into clinical use.

Animals↗

PubMed1978

Effect of sparsomycin analogues on the puromycin-peptidyl transferase reaction on ribosomes.

Sparsomycin analogues in which the unique -S(O)CH2SCH3 moiety was replaced by a variety of more easily accessible side chains were evaluated as inhibitors of the peptidyl transferase reaction with bacterial ribosomes. Competitive inhibition of acetyl[14C]phenylalanylpuromycin formation revealed that the sulfur-containing side chain of sparsomycin could be replaced with hydrophobic moieties, whereas complete removal of the -S(O)CH2SCH3 side chain eliminated the ribosomal binding affinity of sparsomycin. The specificity for the D isomer of S-deoxo-S-propylsparsomycin has established that the chiral carbon of sparsomycin analogues must be identical with the chirality of D-cysteinol for ribosomal binding.

Acyltransferases↗

PubMed1983

Synthesis and biological evaluation of sparsomycin analogues.

Three series of sparsomycin analogues were prepared and examined for their ability to inhibit DNA or protein synthesis in bone marrow, P388 lymphocytic leukemia, and P815 mastocytoma cells. The compounds of series I and II, distinguished by the inclusion or exclusion of a hydroxymethyl functional group, were designed to elucidate the effect on activity of replacing the oxodithioacetal side chain of sparsomycin with 4-substituted benzyl groups. The series III analogues, which excluded the hydroxymethyl group and replaced the oxodithioacetal moiety of sparsomycin with a benzyl amide group, were designed to investigate the potential interaction of an amide oxygen in contrast to the sulfoxide oxygen of sparsomycin. Overall, the bromobenzyl-substituted analogues imparted the greatest inhibitory activity in the protein synthesis assay, while the methoxybenzyl-substituted analogues displayed the least. The methylbenzyl and the unsubstituted benzyl compounds were intermediate in inhibitory potential. The activity in the protein synthesis assay may correspond to the lipophilic and electronic characteristics of the substituents on the benzyl moiety of the analogues. All of the compounds were inactive in the DNA synthesis assay.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Direct crosslinking of the antitumor antibiotic sparsomycin, and its derivatives, to A2602 in the peptidyl transferase center of 23S-like rRNA within ribosome-tRNA complexes.

The antitumor antibiotic sparsomycin is a universal and potent inhibitor of peptide bond formation and selectively acts on several human tumors. It binds to the ribosome strongly, at an unknown site, in the presence of an N-blocked donor tRNA substrate, which it stabilizes on the ribosome. Its site of action was investigated by inducing a crosslink between sparsomycin and bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryotic ribosomes complexed with P-site-bound tRNA, on irradiating with low energy ultraviolet light (at 365 nm). The crosslink was localized exclusively to the universally conserved nucleotide A2602 within the peptidyl transferase loop region of 23S-like rRNA by using a combination of a primer extension approach, RNase H fragment analysis, and crosslinking with radioactive [(125)I]phenol-alanine-sparsomycin. Crosslinking of several sparsomycin derivatives, modified near the sulfoxy group, implicated the modified uracil residue in the rRNA crosslink. The yield of the antibiotic crosslink was weak in the presence of deacylated tRNA and strong in the presence of an N-blocked P-site-bound tRNA, which, as was shown earlier, increases the accessibility of A2602 on the ribosome. We infer that both A2602 and its induced conformational switch are critically important both for the peptidyl transfer reaction and for antibiotic inhibition. This supposition is reinforced by the observation that other antibiotics that can prevent peptide bond formation in vitro inhibit, to different degrees, formation of the crosslink.

Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗

PubMed1988

The development of sparsomycin as an anti-tumour drug.

The synthesis of sparsomycin and eight lipophilic analogues is discussed. Sparsomycin, a bacterial metabolite, is a potent inhibitor of protein biosynthesis; in addition it has anti-tumour properties. Structure-activity relationship studies indicate that the anti-tumour activity is a direct consequence of the inhibition of protein synthesis. Two of the analogues show a higher anti-tumour activity in vitro as well as in vivo, and are less toxic to mice than sparsomycin. Finally, some properties of sparsomycin are discussed: the drug potentiates the cytotoxicity of cisplatin and is selectively active on tumour cells without affecting human bone-marrow.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Chemical, biochemical and genetic endeavours characterizing the interaction of sparsomycin with the ribosome.

Sparsomycin interaction with the ribosome and characteristics of the drug binding site in the particle were studied using chemical modification of the drug, affinity labeling methods and isolation of drug resistant mutants. The structure-function relationship studies, performed with a large number of drug derivatives, indicate that the drug interacts with the ribosome by its western and eastern moieties. The uracil ring, in the western end of the drug molecule, probably forms hydrogen bonds with the rRNA, while the apolar CH3-S-CH3 group in the eastern end interacts with a hydrophobic ribosomal domain that affinity labeling results seem to indicate is formed by protein. An increase in lipophilicity in this part of the antibiotic results in a dramatic increase in the inhibitory activity of the drug. The sparsomycin binding site is not accessible in free ribosomes, but the presence of an N-blocked amino acyl-tRNA at the P-site turns the particles capable of reversible interaction with the drug. After failure using Escherichia coli, a sparsomycin-resistant mutant was obtained by direct mutagenesis on Halobacterium halobium, a species with a unique copy of rRNA genes, stressing the role of rRNA on the drug interaction site.

Binding Sites↗

PubMed1989

Potentiation of cisplatin antitumor activity on L1210 leukemia s.c. by sparsomycin and three of its analogues.

Sparsomycin (Sm) is a known antibiotic derived from Streptomyces. Its potential antitumor activity stimulated the search for a synthetic production method and the development of new derivatives. In a recent screening investigation, three Sm analogues appeared to be more active and considerably less toxic than the parent drug. Sparsomycins became especially interesting when it was shown that Sm potentiates the antitumor activity of cisplatin. In the present study Sm and its three promising analogues: deshydroxy-Sm (dSm), ethyl-deshydroxy-Sm (EdSm) and n-pentyl-Sm (PSm) were studied for their cisplatin potentiating effect. The experiments were performed on CD2F1 mice inoculated with 10(6) L1210 cells s.c. Sparsomycins were administered i.p. 3 h before cisplatin on days 1, 5 and 9. Three of the drugs, Sm, dSm and PSm, showed no potentiating effect in this tumor model. At a dose of 10 mg/kg, EdSm potentiated cisplatin antitumor activity 2.8 times (P less than 0.01) without an increase in weight loss. These results warrant further investigation.

Animals↗

PubMed1989

Lipophilic analogues of sparsomycin as strong inhibitors of protein synthesis and tumor growth: a structure-activity relationship study.

Fourteen derivatives of sparsomycin (1) were synthesized. Six of them were prepared following a novel synthetic route starting from the L-amino acid alanine. Some physicochemical properties, viz. lipophilicity and water solubility, of selected derivatives were measured. The biological activity was tested in vitro in cell-free protein synthesis inhibition assays, in bacterial and tumor cell growth inhibition assays, and in the L1210 leukemia in vivo model in mice. Also for selected drugs the acute toxicity in mice was determined. Ribosomes from both an eukaryotic and a prokaryotic organism were used in the protein synthesis inhibition systems. A linear correlation between the lipophilicity parameters measured was observed. Water solubility and drug toxicity in mice were found to be linearly correlated with lipophilicity. All the derivatives studied are more lipophilic than 1. The deshydroxysparsomycin analogues (30-33) showed an interesting phenomenon: increase in hydrophobicity was accompanied by a considerable increase in water solubility. We found that an increase in hydrophobicity of the drug as a result of replacing the SMe group of 1 with larger alkylthio groups causes an increase in the biological activity of the drug. However, not only the hydrophobicity but also shape and size of the substituent are important; in the homologous series 1-9-10-11-12, 21-22-23-24, and 30-31-32-33, highest protein synthesis inhibitory and in vitro cytostatic activity is found with compounds 11, 23, and 32, respectively, and in comparison with the highly active n-butyl compound 10, the isomeric tert-butyl compound 13 is rather inactive. Polar substituents replacing the SMe group, i.e. Cl in 17 and 35, also render the molecule inactive. Substituting the bivalent sulfur atom for a methylene group decreases the drug's activity. This effect can be compensated for by increasing the length of the alkylsulfinyl side chain. The agreement between the results derived from cell-free and "in vivo" tests is good. The assays using ribosomes of bacterial and eukaryotic organisms give similar results although the latter seem to be more sensitive to changes in hydrophobicity of the drug. Our results confirm the presence of a hydrophobic region at the peptidyl transferase center of the ribosome; the interaction of sparsomycin with this region is more pronounced in the eukaryotic particles. The sparsomycin analogues 11, 23, and 30 show the highest antitumor activity against L1210 leukemia in mice, their median T/C values are 386, 330, and 216%, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗

PubMed1991

Interaction of the antibiotic sparsomycin with the ribosome.

Phenol-alanine-sparsomycin, a derivative of sparsomycin carrying a p-hydroxy-benzyl function easily labeled by iodination, has been used to study the interaction of this drug with the ribosome. Our study indicated that the binding of the drug to the ribosome is sensitive to trichloracetic acid and is equally affected by disintegration of the particle after RNase and protease treatments. The ribosome is not irreversibly inactivated, and the chemical structure of the drug is not affected by interaction with the particle. These data are not compatible with the proposed covalent association of sparsomycin with the ribosome by G. A. Flynn and R. J. Ash (Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 114:1-7, 1983); therefore, the antibiotic must inhibit protein synthesis through a reversible interaction with the ribosome.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed2002

Characterization of sparsomycin resistance in Streptomyces sparsogenes.

The antitumor antibiotic sparsomycin, produced by Streptomyces sparsogenes, is a universal translation inhibitor that blocks the peptide bond formation in ribosomes from all species. Sparsomycin-resistant strains were selected by transforming the sensitive Streptomyces lividans with an S. sparsogenes library. Resistance was linked to the presence of a plasmid containing an S. sparsogenes 5.9-kbp DNA insert. A restriction analysis of the insert traced down the resistance to a 3.6-kbp DNA fragment, which was sequenced. The analysis of the fragment nucleotide sequence together with the previous restriction data associate the resistance to srd, an open reading frame of 1,800 nucleotides. Ribosomes from S. sparsogenes and the S. lividans-resistant strains are equally sensitive to the inhibitor and bind the drug with similar affinity. Moreover, the drug was not modified by the resistant strains. However, resistant cells accumulated less antibiotic than the sensitive ones. In addition, membrane fractions from the resistant strains showed a higher capacity for binding the drug. The results indicate that resistance in the producer strain is not connected to either ribosome modification or drug inactivation, but it might be related to an alteration in the sparsomycin permeability barrier.

Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗