PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Stavudine”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Impact of stavudine phenotype and thymidine analogues mutations on viral response to stavudine plus lamivudine in ALTIS 2 ANRS trial.

OBJECTIVE: Stavudine-based antiretroviral combinations are less effective in zidovudine-experienced patients than in naive subjects and recently, mutations have been described to be associated to the use of both stavudine and zidovudine. In the ALTIS 2 trial, it was shown that a combination of stavudine and lamivudine is less effective in zidovudine-experienced patients than in naive patients. We conducted a retrospective genotypic and phenotypic resistance study (expressed as stavudine phenotypic index, calculated by dividing the inhibitory concentrations 50% [IC50] by the mean value of the sensitive viruses) to evaluate the factors associated with decrease in plasma HIV-1 RNA. DESIGN: Associations with continuous variables were studied using non-parametric Spearman correlation coefficients. Associations with categorical variables were studied using non-parametric Mann-Whitney tests. Multivariate stepwise regression analyses were used to determine independent prognostic factors of the virological response. RESULTS: At baseline, most of the subjects harboured zidovudine-associated mutations in plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Zidovudine and stavudine IC50 and IC50 were strongly associated with response. It appears that a cut-off of stavudine phenotypic index of 1.8-fold of IC50, much lower than the usually used value, could be clinically significant for response to stavudine. In the multivariate analysis, the stepwise model with the higher multiple correlation coefficient (R2 = 0.742) included the presence of a 215 Y/F mutation, the number of previously used nucleoside analogues and a resistant stavudine phenotype. CONCLUSION: These results argue for a phenotypic and genotypic cross resistance between stavudine and zidovudine. Modest increases of IC50 and IC50 for stavudine had an important impact on the virological response during the trial and plead for a new definition of the threshold value for stavudine phenotypic index.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Stavudine-associated peripheral neuropathy in zidovudine-naïve patients: effect of stavudine exposure and antiretroviral experience.

A post hoc analysis of safety data from study protocol NZT40012 assessed the incidence of conditions defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 86 zidovudine-naïve, antiretroviral-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection who responded poorly (plasma HIV-1 RNA > 1000 copies/mL) despite at least 4 months' treatment with stavudine-containing regimens. Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 21%; other conditions were seen less frequently (candidiasis [13%], herpes zoster [12%], diarrhea lasting > 1 month [9%], Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia [9%], and wasting syndrome [8%]). The incidence of peripheral neuropathy rose significantly with the number of drugs comprising treatment regimens (> or = 4 vs 1-3; P = .013) and tended to be higher in patients with longer exposure to stavudine (29% with > or = 24 months' exposure vs 13% with < 24 months). Because peripheral neuropathy was observed with such high frequency, vigilance for signs and symptoms of this condition appears warranted if stavudine-containing regimens are to be continued.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Incidence of resistance in a double-blind study comparing lopinavir/ritonavir plus stavudine and lamivudine to nelfinavir plus stavudine and lamivudine.

Study M98-863 was a double-blind, randomized, phase 3 study that compared lopinavir/ritonavir with nelfinavir, each coadministered with stavudine and lamivudine, in 653 antiretroviral therapy-naive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1-infected subjects. The incidence of HIV drug resistance was analyzed using baseline and rebound virus isolates from subjects with plasma HIV RNA >400 copies/mL from weeks 24 to 108 of therapy. No evidence of genotypic or phenotypic resistance to lopinavir/ritonavir, defined as any active site or primary mutation in HIV protease, was detected in virus isolates from 51 lopinavir/ritonavir-treated subjects with available genotypes. Primary mutations related to nelfinavir resistance (D30N and/or L90M) were observed in 43 (45%) of 96 nelfinavir-treated subjects. Resistance to lamivudine and stavudine was also significantly higher in nelfinavir-treated versus lopinavir/ritonavir-treated subjects. These differences suggest substantially different genetic and pharmacological barriers to resistance for these 2 protease inhibitors and may have implications for strategies for initiating antiretroviral therapy.

Double-Blind Method↗
PubMed2005

Mitochondrial DNA and RNA increase in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from HIV-1-infected patients randomized to receive stavudine-containing or stavudine-sparing combination therapy.

BACKGROUND: Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) has been suggested as a potential marker of mitochondrial toxicity associated with nucleoside analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitor-containing therapy. METHODS: We quantified mtDNA and mitochondrial RNA (mtRNA) in PBMCs over the course of 48 weeks in 78 patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) who were randomly assigned to receive ritonavir-boosted indinavir and efavirenz with or without stavudine. Furthermore, we analyzed the association of mtDNA and mtRNA with clinical signs and symptoms and/or abnormalities in laboratory markers attributed to mitochondrial toxicity. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found in mtDNA and mtRNA content over time between the 2 treatment arms. When arms were combined, both median mtDNA and mtRNA content showed statistically significant increases over the course of 48 weeks, from 206 to 278 copies/cell (P < .001) and from 154 to 288 copies/cell (P = .003), respectively. No statistically significant difference in mtDNA and mtRNA content was found between patients with and those without adverse events attributed to mitochondrial toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The observed increases in mtDNA and mtRNA content during the first year of treatment may represent a restorative trend resulting from suppression of HIV-1 infection, independent of the treatment used. Future studies should focus on well-defined mitochondrial toxicities and changes in these markers within the corresponding affected tissues simultaneously with those in PBMCs. Furthermore, with respect to studies of peripheral blood, mtDNA and mtRNA content in individual cell subtypes rather than in PBMCs may be better markers of toxicity and deserve further investigation.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Thymidine analog and multinucleoside resistance mutations are associated with decreased phenotypic susceptibility to stavudine in HIV type 1 isolated from zidovudine-naive patients experiencing viremia on stavudine-containing regimens.

Studies have demonstrated that HIV-1 isolated from subjects experiencing virologic failure on stavudine (d4T)-containing regimens often contains thymidine analog mutations (TAMs), consisting of reverse transcriptase (RT) mutations M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215Y/F, and K219Q/E, previously associated only with zidovudine (ZDV) resistance. In clinical study NZT40012, HIV-1 was isolated from 86 ZDV-naive subjects experiencing viremia on d4T-based therapies (plasma HIV-1 RNA > or =1000 copies/ml) and analyzed to examine the association between RT mutations and phenotypic resistance to d4T. Resistance-associated mutations were analyzed from HIV-1 isolated from 85 subjects. Of these, 24 samples (28%) had TAMs, and 30 samples (35%) had either TAMs and/or the Q151M multinucleoside resistance (MNR) mutation. Phenotypic susceptibility to d4T was determined by two commercially available methods. Statistically significant increases (p < 0.001) in phenotypic fold resistance to d4T were observed in virus with at least one TAM or MNR mutation. However, the mean increases in phenotypic resistance were 4-fold for the Antivirogram assay and 3-fold for the Phenosense HIV assay, only slightly above the levels used to designate decreased susceptibility to d4T. Subjects can experience viremia on d4T-containing regimens with virus exhibiting only small increases in IC(50), suggesting that relatively small changes in viral susceptibility to d4T may influence drug efficacy.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed2002

A phase II randomized study of the virologic and immunologic effect of zidovudine + stavudine versus stavudine alone and zidovudine + lamivudine in patients with >300 CD4 cells who were antiretroviral naive (ACTG 298).

Before the development of multidrug regimens for treatment of patients with HIV infection single or dual nucleoside therapy was the standard of care. The present study was designed to examine the relative short (12-week) and long-term (48-week) activity of zidovudine (ZDV) vs stavudine (d4T) vs the combination in antiretroviral naive patients. The study was modified so that lamivudine (3TC) was added to ZDV after 12 weeks of monotherapy. A total of 129 subjects entered the study; however, not all were followed for 48 weeks as the study was terminated early due to changing standards of care. The median baseline viral load and CD4 cell count were 10,008 copies/ml and 407 cells/mm(3), respectively. There were no significant differences in the initial (12-week) change in viral load across the three arms. The viral load reduction at 48 weeks was greater in the ZDV/ZDV plus 3TC arm, with an average change of -0.91 log(10) copies/ml than in the d4T alone (-0.47 log(10) copies/ml) or d4T plus ZDV (-0.33 log(10) copies/ml), p = 0.03 and 0.02, respectively. There was a marginally significant increase in the CD4 cell count at Week 12 in the d4T arm as compared to the ZDV/ZDV plus 3TC arm. In general the treatments were well tolerated. The combination of d4T plus ZDV did not result in additional antiviral suppression as compared to either drug alone at 12 weeks and appeared to have less antiviral activity after Week 12. Based on this study and other data, combining d4T and ZDV is not recommended.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed2002

Subtle decreases in stavudine phenotypic susceptibility predict poor virologic response to stavudine monotherapy in zidovudine-experienced patients.

To identify the level of phenotypic susceptibility for stavudine (d4T) that is associated with a diminished virologic response to d4T therapy, phenotyping was performed on archived baseline HIV isolates from 26 subjects who received d4T monotherapy in AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 302 who had received >3 years of prior zidovudine (ZDV) monotherapy. Seven of 26 subjects achieved a virologic response of >0.3-log10 copies/mL reduction in plasma HIV RNA after 8 weeks of d4T. Responders had lower fold changes in susceptibility to d4T (1.0 vs. 1.6, p=.003), lower baseline viral loads (4.26 vs. 4.74 log10 copies/mL, p=.004), and fewer thymidine analog mutations (TAMS) (1 vs. 2, p=.059). Lower baseline d4T fold change in susceptibility predicted greater reductions in HIV RNA from baseline to week 8 after adjusting for baseline HIV RNA, ZDV fold change in susceptibility, and number of TAMS. Using the same phenotypic assay, drug susceptibility among 240 antiretroviral-naive patients found all HIV isolates to have d4T susceptibility <or=1.4-fold change. Using <or=1.4 as the d4T cutoff, the positive predictive value for a virologic response in this study was 44%, and the negative predictive value was 100%. d4T susceptibility greater than 1.4-fold change was associated with failure to achieve significant viral load reduction after 8 weeks of d4T monotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Efficacy of zidovudine compared to stavudine, both in combination with lamivudine and indinavir, in human immunodeficiency virus-infected nucleoside-experienced patients with no prior exposure to lamivudine, stavudine, or protease inhibitors (novavir trial).

We compared the efficacy and the toxicity of zidovudine (AZT) versus stavudine (d4T), in combination with lamivudine (3TC) and indinavir, in AZT-, dideoxyinosine (ddI)-, and/or dideoxycytosine (ddC)-experienced patients in a randomized comparative multicenter trial. One hundred seventy human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients, who had received AZT, ddI, and/or ddC for at least 6 months but were naive for d4T, 3TC, and protease inhibitors, were randomized to AZT at 250 to 300 mg twice daily, 3TC at 150 mg twice daily, and indinavir at 800 mg every 8 h or to d4T at 40 mg twice daily, 3TC at 150 mg twice daily, and indinavir at 800 mg every 8 h. The primary endpoint was time to virological failure, defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA levels of >5,000 copies/ml after at least 8 weeks of antiretroviral therapy. Additional endpoints were change from baseline in CD4 cell counts, AIDS-defining events and adverse events, and proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels of <500 copies/ml and HIV-1 RNA levels of <50 copies/ml. At week 80, 15 patients in the AZT arm and 14 patients in the d4T arm had reached the primary endpoint, and time to virological failure did not differ between the two arms (P = 0.98). In the d4T and in the AZT arms, 67 and 73% of patients, respectively, had HIV-1 RNA levels of <500 copies/ml (P = 0.50). The median change from baseline in CD4 cell count was 195 x 10(6) and 175 x 10(6)/liter for the d4T- and AZT-containing arms, respectively. The proportions of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels of <50 copies/ml at weeks 8, 16, and 24 were similar in the two arms. The occurrence of serious adverse events was not significantly different between arms. In conclusion, in these patients heavily pretreated with AZT, switching from AZT to d4T when initiating indinavir and 3TC did not bring any additional benefit compared to maintaining AZT.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Selection of a T-cell line resistant to stavudine and zidovudine by prolonged treatment with stavudine.

It has been demonstrated that prolonged treatment with nucleoside analogues, such as 3'-azido-3'-deoxythymidine (zidovudine), 2',3'-dideoxycytidine (zalcitabine) and 9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl) adenine (PMEA), may cause selection of cells that are resistant to their anti-HIV activity. A human T-lymphoblastoid cell line that is resistant to the antiviral and cytotoxic activity of 2',3'-didehydro-3'-deoxythymidine (stavudine) has developed as a result of prolonged treatment. These cells, called CEMstavudine, are also less sensitive to zidovudine. The cellular/pharmacological resistance acquired by the CEMstavudine cells is relatively low and appears to correlate with a reduction in thymidine kinase (TK) activity, rather than with a decreased expression of TK mRNA.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed1999

Stavudine: an update of its use in the treatment of HIV infection.

UNLABELLED: Stavudine is a thymidine nucleoside analogue which is phosphorylated intracellularly to an active metabolite, stavudine 5'-triphosphate. This metabolite inhibits HIV replication, either by competing with thymidine 5'-triphosphate for incorporation into viral DNA by reverse transcriptase or by causing premature termination of the viral chain after incorporation. Resistance to stavudine, either alone or as part of resistance to multiple nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, has been reported; however, high-level resistance is uncommon even after long periods of treatment. Initial treatment with stavudine-containing triple therapies reduced HIV RNA levels to below the limit of detection (LOD; 500 copies/ml) in 68 to 100% of antiretroviral-naive patients after at least 20 weeks of treatment. Effects on clinical outcomes have not yet been established, although earlier trials showed significant improvements with stavudine (alone or with 1 other drug) in patients who had previously received zidovudine. Results from 2 randomised nonblind clinical trials indicated that the efficacy of stavudine-containing triple therapy was similar to that of zidovudine-containing triple therapy (when used in combination with the same drugs), although there were no statistical comparisons. Improvements in surrogate end-points have also been seen in trials in antiretroviral-experienced patients receiving stavudine and 2 or 3 other antiretroviral agents. Stavudine-containing combination therapies have also been effective in reducing viral load and increasing CD4+ lymphocyte count in children, although data are limited. Like other nucleoside analogues, stavudine treatment can cause mitochondrial toxicity. The major adverse effect from this observed with stavudine therapy is peripheral neuropathy, which is both dosage- and treatment duration-dependent. Most cases respond to short term cessation of treatment and reintroduction of stavudine at half the previous dosage. CONCLUSION: Stavudine-containing triple therapies are effective in the treatment of antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV infection as assessed by surrogate end-points; earlier trials involving 1 or 2-drug therapy showed that stavudine can significantly improve clinical end-points. Stavudine has also been beneficial as part of combination regimens in antiretroviral-experienced patients and children with HIV infection, although data are limited and more studies are needed. High-level resistance to stavudine is uncommon. The major adverse event associated with treatment is peripheral neuropathy, which may limit its use in some patients. Currently, stavudine has a valuable role as part of initial triple therapy in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV/AIDS.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed1996

Stavudine: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and clinical potential in HIV infection.

Stavudine is a nucleoside analogue which undergoes intracellular phosphorylation to its active metabolite, stavudine-5'-triphosphate. At clinically relevant concentrations, the active metabolite restricts HIV replication by inhibiting the inclusion of thymidine-5'-triphosphate into proviral DNA by HIV reverse transcriptase, and/or by causing DNA chain termination. Viral resistance to stavudine does not commonly develop during treatment. Where it has developed, up to a 12-fold increase in resistance has been observed in clinical isolates from patients treated with stavudine for long periods. Stavudine 40mg twice daily and zidovudine 200mg 3 times daily were compared in 822 patients at various stages of HIV infection who had previously received long term zidovudine therapy. Stavudine was superior for both primary and surrogate end-points including clinical progression, treatment failure, increase in CD4+ cell counts and bodyweight gain. In a larger study, stavudine 40mg twice daily provided greater benefit than stavudine 20mg twice daily in terms of weight gain, haematological findings and the number of hospitalisations in 11 784 patients intolerant of or resistant to, zidovudine and didanosine. Peripheral neuropathy is the major dose-limiting adverse event associated with stavudine therapy and occurred more frequently with stavudine than zidovudine. However, haematological adverse events were observed less frequently with stavudine than with zidovudine. Thus, stavudine is effective in alleviating signs and symptoms of HIV infection in patients intolerant of or no longer responding to, zidovudine or didanosine. It is also more effective than zidovudine in slowing disease progression in patients previously treated with zidovudine for long periods. The results of studies which will reveal the role of stavudine therapy in untreated patients and in combination with other anti-HIV agents are awaited with interest.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Clinical efficacy of monotherapy with stavudine compared with zidovudine in HIV-infected, zidovudine-experienced patients. A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Bristol-Myers Squibb Stavudine/019 Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Stavudine is a promising antiretroviral agent, but its clinical efficacy has not been determined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical effect of stavudine (2',3'-didehydro-3'-deoxythymidine) monotherapy in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. SETTING: 56 outpatient clinics in private practices, universities, and contract research organizations in the United States, France, and Italy. PATIENTS: 822 HIV-infected adults who had 50 to 500 CD4+ cells/mm3 and had previously received at least 6 months of zidovudine treatment. INTERVENTION: Monotherapy with peroral stavudine capsules or peroral zidovudine capsules. MEASUREMENTS: The primary end point was clinical progression, which was defined as all occurrences of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining events or death. RESULTS: Patients receiving stavudine reached clinical end points at a rate of 26 per 100 person-years, compared with 32 per 100 person-years for patients receiving zidovudine (relative risk, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.98]; P = 0.03). The risk for death alone was 26% lower in the stavudine group than in the zidovudine group, but the comparison was not statistically significant (relative risk, 0.74 [CI, 0.53 to 1.02]; P = 0.066). The benefit of stavudine therapy was seen in all CD4+ cell strata (< or = 100 cells/mm3, 101 to 300 cells/mm3, and > 300 cells/mm3) and clinical stages of HIV disease (asymptomatic, symptomatic, and AIDS). Four weeks after treatment began, CD4+ cell counts were 30 cells/mm3 higher in the stavudine group than in the zidovudine group; this difference was sustained for 96 weeks (P < 0.001). Nausea and vomiting were more common in patients receiving zidovudine (P < 0.01), and neuropathy occurred more frequently in those receiving stavudine (12% in the stavudine group compared with 4% in the zidovudine group; P < 0.001). Neuropathy resolved completely in many patients (63%) after interruption of stavudine treatment; these patients could resume stavudine therapy at a lower dose. CONCLUSIONS: Stavudine was well tolerated and delayed progression of HIV disease in patients who had previously received 6 or more months of zidovudine treatment. Benefits were apparent in all CD4+ cell strata and clinical stages of HIV disease. Stavudine is an important agent to consider for trials of combination chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

In vivo maternal-fetal pharmacokinetics of stavudine (2',3'-didehydro-3'-deoxythymidine) in pigtailed macaques (Macaca nemestrina).

To determine whether stavudine (2',3'-didehydro-3'-deoxythymidine) is actively transported in vivo across the placenta and to determine the extent of its transfer, stavudine was administered as an intravenous bolus to four near-term macaques (Macaca nemestrina) (5 mg/kg of body weight via the femoral vein) or to their fetuses (10 mg/kg via the carorid artery) at gestational age 134 +/- 5 days, with the administrations about 1 week apart. Antipyrine (a passive diffusion marker) was always coadministered (20 mg/kg) with stavudine. Samples of maternal and fetal plasma and amniotic fluid were collected at frequent intervals up to 240 min after the dose. In a separate experiment, three animals received stavudine for 30 h at a low rate of infusion (22 micrograms/min/kg via the femoral vein) to the dam or at a 10-fold-higher rate of infusion (220 micrograms/min/kg), separated by at least one week, in order to determine if the transplacental transfer of stavudine is saturable. Antipyrine (41.7 micrograms/min/kg) was coinfused with stavudine. Samples of maternal and fetal plasma and amniotic fluid were collected at regular intervals for up to 30 h. The concentrations of stavudine and antipyrine were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. The transplacental maternal-fetal drug clearances were compared by the paired Student t test. The clearance associated with maternal-fetal transfer of the drug (CLdf) (0.54 +/- 0.08 ml/min/kg) was not significantly different (P > 0.05) from the clearance associated with fetal-maternal transfer of the drug, CLfd (0.66 +/- 0.11 ml/min/kg). Also, CLdf was not significantly different (P > 0.05) from CLfd when normalized with respect to the corresponding transplacental clearance of antipyrine (0.23 +/- 0.04 versus 0.36 +/- 0.25). The ratios of the steady-state plasma stavudine concentration in the fetus to that in the dam were 0.77 +/- 0.06 at the low stavudine infusion rate and 0.81 +/- 0.09 at the high stavudine infusion rate. The obtained data indicate that transfer of stavudine across the placenta is passive and constant over the dose range studied.

Amniotic Fluid↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Changes in body fat measured by DEXA in patients taking different formulations of stavudine.

BACKGROUND: Lipoatrophy is a frequent complication of chronic stavudine therapy. Stavudine extended release formulation (stavudine ER) gives lower peak and higher trough levels than the immediate release formulation (stavudine IR), and we hypothesized that the lower peak might result in less lipoatrophy. OBJECTIVE: To compare the rate of peripheral lipoatrophy between patients taking stavudine ER and stavudine IR. METHOD: Body composition was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) every 6 months for 18 months in 29 patients taking either stavudine ER or IR as part of a randomized controlled clinical trial. RESULTS: DEXA fat measurements did not differ between the ER and IR groups at baseline, after a median of 32 months on stavudine-containing treatment. Over the 18 months of follow-up in the whole cohort limb fat decreased by a mean of 0.29 +/- 0.50 kg (p = .01) and leg fat percent decreased by a mean of 1.23% +/- 1.92% (p = .001), whereas trunk fat and trunk-to-limb fat percent ratio did not change significantly. There was no significant difference between the ER and IR groups in the rate of change of any of the fat parameters. At study completion, the proportion of patients with clinical lipodystrophy was similar in the stavudine ER and stavudine IR groups (67% and 64%, respectively; p = .893). CONCLUSION: Stavudine ER does not appear to cause less peripheral lipoatrophy.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1998

Diminished HIV-1 sensitivity to stavudine in patients on prolonged therapy occurs only at low levels and cannot be attributed to any single amino acid substitution in reverse transcriptase.

To study the extent to which phenotypic resistance to stavudine occurs under therapy, we studied 18 pairs of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates from patients both prior to and following 24-48 weeks of treatment with stavudine monotherapy or stavudine in combination with either didanosine or lamivudine. We also used a nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay to probe for the presence of specific mutations associated in culture with stavudine resistance. The results showed that resistance to stavudine (approximately 3-10 fold) was observed in nine of ten cases of monotherapy, in three of four cases of therapy involving both stavudine and didanosine, and in two of four cases involving stavudine and lamivudine. Viruses from the four patients receiving stavudine plus didanosine became resistant to didanosine in only one instance while the use of lamivudine plus stavudine yielded resistance to lamivudine each time. Whereas changes in the reverse transcriptase (RT) genes of resistant isolates were frequently observed, two mutations, previously identified with stavudine resistance in tissue culture (i.e., V75T and I50T), could not be identified in the clinical samples by either direct sequencing of the RT gene or by PCR amplification. Thus, resistance to stavudine can occur, albeit at low levels, in the context of prolonged therapy with this drug but is not associated with specific mutations in HIV RT at either codons 75 or 50 in clinical samples.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1996

Lamivudine or stavudine in two- and three-drug combinations against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication in vitro.

Two- and three-drug combinations of lamivudine or stavudine with other antiretroviral drugs were evaluated for activity against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Other agents included zidovudine, didanosine, nevirapine, and saquinavir. Paired zidovudine-sensitive and -resistant clinical HIV-1 isolates were used. Additive or synergistic interactions were observed against the zidovudine-sensitive isolate with the following combinations: lamivudine-zidovudine, lamivudine-stavudine, lamivudine-saquinavir, lamivudine-nevirapine, stavudine-zidovudine, stavudine-didanosine, stavudine-saquinavir, stavudine-nevirapine, lamivudine-zidovudine-saquinavir, lamivudine-zidovudine-stavudine, stavudine-zidovudine-nevirapine, lamivudine-zidovudine-nevirapine, and stavudine-zidovudine-saquinavir. Against the zidovudine-resistant isolate, additive or synergistic interactions were seen with most two- and three-drug combinations, but the combination of stavudine-zidovudine was antagonistic. The clinical implications of these in vitro observations should be explored.

Antiviral Agents↗