SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “THERMOTHERAPY”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2000

Thermotherapy for treating rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Heat and cold therapy are often used as adjuncts in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis by rehabilitation specialists. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of heat and cold on objective and subjective measures of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched Medline, Embase, PEDro, Current Contents, Sports Discus and CINAHL up to June 2000. The Cochrane Field of Rehabilitation and related therapies and the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Review Group were also contacted for a search of their specialized registers. Handsearching was conducted on all retrieved articles for additional articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized or controlled clinical trials of ice or heat compared to placebo or active interventions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and case-control and cohort studies were eligible. No language restrictions were applied. Abstracts were accepted. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two independent reviewers identified potential articles from the literature search. These reviewers extracted data using pre-defined extraction forms. Consensus was reached on all data extraction. Quality was assessed by two reviewers using a 5 point scale that measured the quality of randomization, double-blinding and description of withdrawals. MAIN RESULTS: Three studies (79 subjects) met the inclusion criteria. There was no effect on objective measures of disease activity (including inflammation, pain and x-ray measured joint destruction) of either ice versus control or heat versus control. Patients reported that they preferred heat therapy to no therapy (94% like heat therapy better than no therapy). There was no difference in patient preference for heat or ice. No harmful effects of ice or heat were reported. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Since patients enjoy thermotherapy, and there are no harmful effects, thermotherapy should be recommended as a therapy which can be applied at home as needed to relieve pain. There is no need for further research on the effects of heat or cold for RA.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗

PubMed1997

Quality of life assessment in patients treated with lower energy thermotherapy (Prostasoft 2.0): results of a randomized transurethral microwave thermotherapy versus sham study.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the impact of lower energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy on quality of life and quality of sexual function in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 patients with BPH were randomized to receive either lower energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy treatment (Prostasoft 2.0) or placebo treatment and followed for 26 weeks after treatment. All patients completed a Madsen symptom score and quality of life questionnaire to assess acceptability, daily activities, psychological well-being, social activities and improvement in quality of life. A sexual function questionnaire was used to assess changes in sexual function after microwave thermotherapy. RESULTS: A significant difference in voiding parameters and symptom score was found between the transurethral microwave thermotherapy and sham groups. Maximum uroflow changed from 9.6 ml. per second at baseline to 13.9 ml. per second and from 9.9 ml. per second at baseline to 9.6 ml. per second at 26 weeks for transurethral microwave thermotherapy and sham groups, respectively. Madsen score improved from 13.2 to 5.3 for the transurethral microwave thermotherapy group and from 11.9 to 9.1 for the sham group. For quality of life measures, a statistically significant difference in favor of the transurethral microwave thermotherapy group was found only for the acceptability item. At baseline and after 26 weeks no statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups for Quality of Life measures documenting sexual function. However, almost 20% of patients treated by either transurethral microwave thermotherapy or sham claimed at 26 weeks after treatment that treatment had influenced sexual function. CONCLUSIONS: Although significant changes in objective and subjective parameters were found in patients after lower energy microwave thermotherapy, the change in quality of life was minimal. In addition to the minimal invasiveness of transurethral microwave thermotherapy, preservation of sexual function is appealing.

Aged↗

PubMed1999

Sexual function following high energy microwave thermotherapy: results of a randomized controlled study comparing transurethral microwave thermotherapy to transurethral prostatic resection.

PURPOSE: We evaluate changes in sexual function in patients treated with high energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy compared to transurethral resection of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 147 patients randomized to undergo transurethral microwave thermotherapy or transurethral resection of the prostate were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire evaluating sexual function before, and 3 and 12 months after treatment. The questionnaire dealt with such items as social status, libido, quality of erection, ejaculation and overall satisfaction of sexual functioning. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant improvement of micturition in both groups. The improvement in the transurethral prostatic resection group was significantly better than in the transurethral microwave thermotherapy group. Antegrade ejaculation occurred at 3 months following treatment in 27% of the transurethral prostatic resection group compared to 74% of the transurethral microwave thermotherapy group and at 1 year in 37 and 67%, respectively. Significantly more patients undergoing transurethral prostatic resection (36%) had changes in sexual function compared to the transurethral microwave thermotherapy group (17%). The transurethral microwave thermotherapy group was more satisfied with the sex life. Of these patients 55% graded sex as very satisfying compared to 21% in the transurethral prostatic resection group. The severity of symptoms was not correlated with sexual function in this study. In general, older patients had sexual dysfunction more often, while younger patients had pain during sexual activities more frequently. CONCLUSIONS: Although clinically less effective, high energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy is a better therapeutic option than surgery for patients who want to preserve sexual function. In particular ejaculation is often preserved after transurethral microwave thermotherapy while there is significant deterioration following transurethral prostatic resection. In general, older patients have greater sexual dysfunction.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Seeking evidence that cell kill guided thermotherapy gives results not inferior to those of transurethral prostate resection: results of a pooled analysis of 3 studies of feedback transurethral microwave thermotherapy.

PURPOSE: We compared ProstaLund Feedback Treatment (PLFT) to transurethral prostate resection (TURP) in terms of efficacy and safety in a pooled analysis of 3 clinical studies with 1-year followup. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall raw data on 183 patients with PLFT and 65 with TURP were pooled. All studies had identical inclusion criteria, and the efficacy and safety of the method were evaluated using the International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urine flow (Qmax), responder rate, bother score, prostate volume reduction and adverse events. RESULTS: The response rate was 85.3% and 85.9% in the PLFT and TURP groups, respectively. One-sided 95% CI analysis showed the noninferiority of PLFT vs TURP for this variable. Mean International Prostate Symptom Score was significantly decreased in the PLFT and TURP groups after 12 months (from 20.9 to 6.4 and 20.7 to 7.1, respectively). The 1-sided upper 95% CI of PLFT was within the noninferiority definition compared with that of TURP. The bother score decrease in the PLFT and TURP groups was not significant different (70.9% and 64.0%, respectively). An increase in Qmax from 7.7 to 16.1 ml per second 12 months after PLFT was noted, while the improvement in Qmax in the TURP group was higher (from 7.5 to 18.6 ml per second). The 1-sided lower 95% CI was close (0.76) but it did not attain the predetermined level of noninferiority (0.80). Mean transurethral ultrasound determined volume 12 months after PLFT and TURP was reduced by 32.8% and 58.1%, respectively. A significant correlation between the transurethral ultrasound determined prostate volume reduction and estimated cell kill was found (r = 0.456, p <0.000001). Serious adverse events with causality occurred in 15.4% of patients with TURP compared with 6.0% in those with PLFT (p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Combined experience from our pooled analysis indicates that PLFT challenges TURP in terms of efficacy and safety after 1 year of followup.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Transpupillary thermotherapy versus plaque radiotherapy for suspected choroidal melanomas.

PURPOSE: To examine the outcomes and complications of transpupillary thermotherapy for treatment of small choroidal melanomas. DESIGN: Retrospective case-matched comparative study and retrospective observational study. PARTICIPANTS: The case-matched study consisted of 36 patients treated with either transpupillary thermotherapy or plaque radiotherapy (18 patients per group). The observational study consisted of 21 patients treated with transpupillary thermotherapy alone (primary transpupillary thermotherapy) and 9 patients treated with transpupillary thermotherapy plus plaque radiotherapy (adjuvant transpupillary thermotherapy). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity, local tumor control, and metastasis. RESULTS: The case-matched groups did not differ significantly with respect to age, gender, initial visual acuity, tumor location, or length of follow-up (mean, 33 months for transpupillary thermotherapy vs. 40 months for plaque radiotherapy). There was no significant difference in final visual acuity (P = 0.810) or postoperative visual acuity change (P = 0.919) between the 2 groups. In the observational study, the mean follow-up was 32 months (range, 4-58 months). Indications for primary transpupillary thermotherapy included documented growth (10 patients) and the presence of >/=3 risk factors for growth (11 patients). Retinal complications occurred in 16 patients (76%). The mean posttreatment visual acuity change was minus 2 lines (range, minus 9 to plus 7 lines). Local failure occurred in 6 patients (29%). Local failure was associated with an increased number of transpupillary thermotherapy spots per session (P = 0.023) and decreased tumor pigmentation (P = 0.001). Indications for adjuvant transpupillary thermotherapy included tumor radioresistance (6 patients) and the presence of risk factors for local failure (3 patients). All 9 tumors that received adjuvant transpupillary thermotherapy regressed rapidly, with no local failures. The mean postoperative visual acuity change was -1.9 lines (range, -9 to +5 lines). No patient in either study developed metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: The recent interest in transpupillary thermotherapy as primary therapy for choroidal melanoma is based largely on the assumption that transpupillary thermotherapy may provide better visual outcomes than plaque radiotherapy. However, this study found no significant difference in visual outcomes between transpupillary thermotherapy and plaque radiotherapy. Further, the local failure rate with transpupillary thermotherapy was substantially higher than with plaque radiotherapy. The most promising role for transpupillary thermotherapy seems to be as an adjunct to plaque radiotherapy. The appropriate indications for transpupillary thermotherapy in the management of choroidal melanoma need to be re-evaluated.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

[Diode laser thermotherapy and chemothermotherapy in the treatment of retinoblastoma].

INTRODUCTION: The use of transpupillary thermotherapy alone or associated with systemic chemotherapy is a therapeutic modality of ocular retinoblastoma that allows ocular preservation without external beam irradiation of the eye. We present our experience with thermotherapy in the treatment of selected cases of retinoblastoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This paper reports a retrospective case series of patients treated for retinoblastoma by thermotherapy or chemothermotherapy (carboplatin IV followed by thermotherapy) in a single institution from October 1994 to December 2000. Data collected include general characteristics of the treated children, tumor characteristics, and the results of the treatments on local tumor control. Transpupillar thermotherapy was delivered with a diode laser through an operating microscope. Each tumor was treated separately and laser intensity, spot size, and duration were adapted to the size of the tumor and the clinical response. Chemothermotherapy consisted in thermotherapy delivered shortly after an intravenous injection of carboplatin (560 mg/m(2)) at day 1, followed by thermotherapy alone at day 8 if the lesion was 6mm or more in diameter. This cycle was administered every 28 days. The choice between thermotherapy and chemothermotherapy depended on the initial size of the lesions. Thermotherapy was used when the lesion measured 3mm or less. Lesions measuring more than 15 mm, or associated with substantial vitreous seeding, retinal detachment, or optic nerve head involvement are not suitable for these techniques. RESULTS: During the study period, 239 children were treated in our institution and 109 of them (147 eyes, 372 tumors) could be treated conservatively without external beam radiation. The median tumor diameter at the moment of thermotherapy or chemothermotherapy was 2mm (range, 0.2-15.0mm). One hundred and ninety-four tumors were treated by chemothermotherapy and 18 by thermotherapy alone. In 75% of the cases, the treatment was administered after two courses of chemotherapy (etoposide and carboplatin). After a mean follow-up of 55 months (range, 16-89 months), tumor control was obtained in 87.1% of lesions after chemothermotherapy and 77.8% after thermotherapy. Salvage enucleation was necessary for seven lesions (seven eyes) but none in the cases where thermotherapy was used alone. No severe systemic side effects were noted. DISCUSSION: Diode laser delivers hyperthermia on the tumor bed and its use alone or in association with systemic administration of carboplatin makes it possible to preserve the eye without external beam irradiation, with few side effects and less cumulative doses of chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Thermotherapy and chemothermotherapy provide excellent local tumor control and eye preservation in selected cases of retinoblastoma.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed1997

Study of the effects of thermotherapy in benign prostatic hypertrophy.

UNLABELLED: Prostatic transurethral thermotherapy was evaluated clinically using the Prostcare microwave system of the Bruker Company, which uses a microwave radiometer to measure and control intraprostatic temperature. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to evaluate the immediate histological lesions induced in the prostatic tissue depending on the temperatures delivered to the prostate; the histological changes when adenectomy is carried out after thermotherapy, and the endoscopic appearance of the prostatic fossa 48 h, and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after thermotherapy. METHODS: Our study was divided into three stages: in the first stage, we conducted thermotherapy in 10 patients in whom suprapubic adenectomy was indicated. During thermotherapy, a multipoint fiber-optic receptor and two thermocouples were implanted into the prostage gland at a distance of 5-15 mm from the urethra. Adenectomy was carried out 10 min after thermotherapy; the second stage of our study concerned the changes seen over time. We heated adenomas using the same protocol and carried out adenectomy 24, 48, 72 h, and 1 week, 6 weeks and 3 months after thermotherapy, and lastly, we studied the endoscopic appearance after a single heating-session of 30 min by endoscopic controls at different times after thermotherapy (48 h, 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after thermotherapy). RESULTS: Macroscopic appearance: necrotic lesions measured 30 mm in length on average. Necrosis was roughly circumferential. Immediate histological aspect: in all cases, histological examination showed coagulation necrosis with periurethral thromboses. Histological changes: at 8 days, necrosis intensity was maximal and histological structures were difficult to identify. Endoscopic appearance: 3 months after thermotherapy, the typical endoscopic appearance was a large periurethral cavity. There was a sharp demarcation between untreated areas and cicatricial tissue. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of thermotherapy depends on the radiometric temperature, which should reach 47 degrees C (i.e. a temperature of 55-65 degrees C delivered to the prostate), and a rapid increase in temperature, i.e. in the power applied, which should reach the thermal radiometric level of 47 degrees C in 5 min. As soon as necrosis is obtained, the power is automatically reduced. Using this protocol, heating proves effective in 30 min.

Humans↗

PubMed1999

Thermotherapy for retinoblastoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of thermotherapy for retinoblastoma. DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized analysis of the treatment method. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 188 retinoblastomas in 80 eyes of 58 patients who were treated with thermotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Tumor response and ocular adverse effects. RESULTS: Of 188 retinoblastomas treated with thermotherapy, mean tumor base was 3.0 mm and tumor thickness was 2.0 mm. Complete tumor regression was achieved in 161 tumors (85.6%), and 27 tumors (14.4%) developed recurrence. Using univariate analysis, the predictors of local tumor recurrence were male sex (P = .005), no color change ("no visible take") in tumor after treatment (P = .01), increasing number of treatment sessions (P = .002), and previous use of chemoreduction (P = .02). By multivariate analysis, the most important predictors of local tumor recurrence were male sex (P = .01) and previous use of chemoreduction (P = .03), the latter likely reflecting the fact that these tumors were initially larger with more ominous findings, and required chemoreduction therapy to reduce them to a size amenable to focal treatment with thermotherapy. When evaluating thermotherapy variables as a function of tumor size, it was apparent that larger tumors (> or =3.0-mm base) required greater energy and time than did smaller tumors (<3.0-mm base). Comparison of treatment variables for larger vs smaller tumors was as follows: number of treatment sessions, 3.3 vs 2.3; spot size, 1.7 vs 1.3 mm; power, 540 vs 370 mW; treatment duration, 49 vs 14 minutes; and coupling of thermotherapy with chemotherapy, 79% vs 48% of cases (P < or =.001 for each variable). Complications of thermotherapy in the 80 eyes included focal iris atrophy in 29 eyes (36%), peripheral focal lens opacity in 19 eyes (24%), retinal traction in 4 eyes (5%), retinal vascular obstruction in 2 eyes (2%), and transient localized serous retinal detachment in 2 eyes (2%). There were no cases of corneal scarring, central lens opacity, iris or retinal neovascularization, or rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. All eyes with focal lens opacity demonstrated adjacent focal iris atrophy. By multivariate analysis, the predictors of thermotherapy-induced focal iris atrophy were increasing number of treatment sessions (P = .001) and increasing tumor base (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Thermotherapy is used for relatively small retinoblastomas without associated vitreous or subretinal seeds. This treatment provides satisfactory control for selected retinoblastomas, with 86% of tumors demonstrating lasting regression. Tumors that measure 3.0 mm or larger in base at the time of thermotherapy require more intense treatment than smaller tumors and are at greatest risk for ocular complications such as focal iris atrophy and focal paraxial lens opacity.

Chemotherapy, Adjuvant↗

PubMed1999

Does transurethral microwave thermotherapy have a different effect on prostate cancer than on benign or hyperplastic tissue?

OBJECTIVES: Transurethral microwave thermotherapy is useful for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia, but its effect on cancer is not documented. We analyzed the pathologic changes occurring after microwave thermotherapy in whole mount radical prostatectomy specimens from patients with cancer. METHODS: Nine patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with transurethral microwave thermotherapy (Urologix Targis System). Patients ranged in age from 64 to 72 years (mean 68). Seven patients underwent prostatectomy 4 to 90 hours after thermotherapy, and 2 other patients underwent prostatectomy 12 months after thermotherapy. Whole mount totally embedded prostates were mapped for necrosis and cancer, and the volume of each was measured by the grid method. RESULTS: Pathologic stages were T2a (n = 4), T2b (n = 4), and T3b (n = 1). The prostates from patients who underwent radical prostatectomy within 4 to 90 hours of thermotherapy had a mean prostate weight of 47.4 g (range 19.5 to 70.3). Each consistently showed hemorrhagic necrosis and tissue devitalization without significant inflammation. Necrosis involved contiguous areas of benign epithelium, stroma, and cancer without skip areas. The mean volume of necrosis was 8.8 cc (range 1.4 to 17.8), and the mean percentage of the prostate involved by necrosis was 22% (range 3% to 39%). The necrosis was symmetric around the urethra in 6 of 7 cases. Urethral dilation was observed in 3 patients, and the mean maximum radial distance of necrotic tissue was 1.4 cm (range 0.6 to 1.8). Necrotic change was noted in 80% to 100% of the volume of cancer in 4 cases, 40% to 60% in 2 cases, and 5% in 1 case. The prostates from the 2 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy 12 months after thermotherapy had a mean weight of 88 g (55 and 121 g, respectively). Each showed periurethral fibrosis, nonspecific chronic inflammation, and squamous metaplasia of the urothelium. The mean volume of necrosis remaining was 0.2 cc. The mean percentage of the prostate involved by necrosis 1 year after thermotherapy was less than 1%. There was some reabsorption of dead tissue. The mean maximum radial distance of the necrotic tissue was 0.4 cm (0.2 and 0.7 cm, respectively). The prostatic urethra had viable and partially denuded urothelium in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Microwave thermotherapy is clinically useful for ablation of benign prostate and cancer contiguous to the urethra, resulting in hemorrhagic necrosis with minimal damage to the urethra. There was no apparent differential morphologic sensitivity of benign prostatic tissue, hyperplastic tissue, or cancer to thermotherapy.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Short-term effects of thermotherapy for spasticity on tibial nerve F-waves in post-stroke patients.

Thermotherapy is generally considered appropriate for post-stroke patients with spasticity, yet its acute antispastic effects have not been comprehensively investigated. F-wave parameters have been used to demonstrate changes in motor neuron excitability in spasticity and pharmacological antispastic therapy. The present study aimed to confirm the efficacy of thermotherapy for spasticity by evaluating alterations in F-wave parameters in ten male post-stroke patients with spastic hemiparesis (mean age: 49.0+/-15.0 years) and ten healthy male controls (mean age: 48.7+/-4.4 years). The subjects were immersed in water at 41 degrees C for 10 min. Recordings were made over the abductor hallucis muscle, and antidromic stimulation was performed on the tibial nerve at the ankle. Twenty F-waves were recorded before, immediately after, and 30 min following thermotherapy for each subject. F-wave amplitude and F-wave/M-response ratio were determined. Changes in body temperature and surface-skin temperature were monitored simultaneously. The mean and maximum values of both F-wave parameters were higher on the affected side before thermotherapy. In the post-stroke patients, the mean and maximum values of both parameters were significantly reduced after thermotherapy (P<0.01). Hence, the antispastic effects of thermotherapy were indicated by decreased F-wave parameters. Body temperature was significantly increased both immediately after and 30 min after thermotherapy in all subjects. This appeared to play an important role in decreased spasticity. Surface-skin temperature increased immediately after thermotherapy in both groups and returned to baseline 30 min later. These findings demonstrate that thermotherapy is an effective nonpharmacological antispastic treatment that might facilitate stroke rehabilitation.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Cost effectiveness of microwave thermotherapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: part II--results.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of transurethral microwave thermotherapy relative to medical therapy (alpha-blocking agents) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for patients with moderate-to-severe benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) symptoms. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from the societal perspective for a hypothetical cohort of 65-year-old men with moderate-to-severe BPH symptoms. We calculated the incremental cost effectiveness of thermotherapy relative to medical therapy and TURP during 5 years after treatment initiation. Event probabilities were obtained from published reports, a consensus panel, and the Targis System (Urologix) randomized clinical trial. Costs were estimated using the national Medicare reimbursement schedules. Costs are reported in 1999 U.S. dollars. Total thermotherapy procedure costs were estimated at $2629. Quality-of-life and utility estimates were obtained by interviewing 13 patients with moderate-to-severe BPH symptoms. On the basis of their risk attitudes, patients were classified into risk-averse or non-risk-averse groups. The costs and health effects were discounted at 3% annually. RESULTS: In a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 non-risk-averse patients who were candidates for all three modalities, the 5-year costs were highest for patients undergoing TURP and lowest for those receiving medical therapy ($7334 and $6294, respectively). The thermotherapy group exhibited the highest 5-year utility value (53.52 quality-adjusted life-months). Compared with medical therapy, thermotherapy resulted in an additional 0.23 quality-adjusted life-months, with an incremental cost of $741. This yielded an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained of $38,664 for thermotherapy compared with medical therapy. Thermotherapy had a higher utility (difference of 1.71 quality-adjusted life-months) and lower cost (difference of $299) compared with TURP and thus was dominant over TURP. The results were similar for a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 risk-averse patients. CONCLUSIONS: From a societal perspective, thermotherapy appears to be a reasonable and cost-effective alternative to both medical and surgical treatment. However, the actual treatment decision should be based on multiple factors, only one of which is cost effectiveness.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗

PubMed1998

Transpupillary thermotherapy for choroidal melanoma: tumor control and visual results in 100 consecutive cases.

OBJECTIVE: The authors evaluated the results of primary transpupillary thermotherapy for choroidal melanoma in 100 cases. DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized analysis of treatment method. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred patients with choroidal melanoma were studied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Tumor response, ocular side effects, and visual results. RESULTS: Of 100 consecutive patients with choroidal melanoma treated with transpupillary thermotherapy, the mean tumor basal diameter was 7.1 mm and tumor thickness was 2.8 mm. The tumor margin touched the optic disc in 34 eyes (34%) and was beneath the fovea in 42 eyes (42%). Documented growth was present in 64 eyes (64%), and known clinical risks for growth were present in all of the remaining 36 eyes (36%), with an average of 4 of 5 statistical risk factors for growth per tumor. After a mean of three treatment sessions and 14 months of follow-up, the mean tumor thickness was reduced to 1.4 mm. Treatment was successful in 94 eyes (94%) and failed in 6 eyes (6%). Three patients with amelanotic tumors showed no initial response to thermotherapy, but subsequent intravenous indocyanine green administration during thermotherapy resulted in improved heat absorption and tumor regression to a flat scar. The six eyes classified as treatment failures included four eyes with tumors that showed partial or no response to thermotherapy, thus requiring plaque radiotherapy or enucleation, and two eyes with recurrence, subsequently controlled with additional thermotherapy. After treatment, the visual acuity was the same (within 1 line) or better than the pretreatment visual acuity in 58 eyes (58%) and worse in 42 eyes (42%). The main reasons for poorer vision included treatment through the foveola for subfoveal tumor (25 eyes), retinal traction (10 eyes), retinal vascular obstruction (5 eyes), optic disc edema (1 eye), and unrelated ocular ischemia (1 eye). Temporal location (versus nasal and superior, P = 0.02) and greater distance from the optic disc (P = 0.04) were risks for retinal traction. CONCLUSIONS: Transpupillary thermotherapy may be an effective treatment for small posterior choroidal melanoma, especially those near the optic disc and fovea. Despite satisfactory local tumor control, ocular side effects can result in decreased vision. Longer follow-up will be necessary to assess the impact of thermotherapy on ultimate local tumor control and metastatic disease.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Thermotherapy and thermoablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: From all the available thermoablative methods for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia, transurethral microwave thermotherapy is considered as standard in minimally invasive management. The literature is enriched by several new studies on transurethral microwave thermotherapy, and thus this review presents up-to-date information about thermotherapy. RECENT FINDINGS: New studies have provided significant information regarding differences in outcome for devices with different protocols and selection criteria, confirming the superiority of high-energy programmes. Furthermore, monitoring of the intraprostatic temperature promises better clinical results by means of individualization of the treatment. Long-term results have been available and allow the evaluation of the fundamental issue of treatment durability. Improvement after high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy remains durable for more than 2.5 years. Randomized studies comparing this treatment with other established therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia, including medical treatment and transurethral resection of the prostate, have also contributed to an evaluation of the morbidity, and costs of treatment. Clinical outcomes with transurethral microwave thermotherapy are in the range of those obtained with transurethral resection of the prostate and are superior to those of medical management. Retreatment after transurethral resection of the prostate emerges because of complications following the procedure, whereas retreatment after transurethral microwave thermotherapy is as a result of treatment failure. In addition, the rate of failure of medical management is almost seven times higher than that for transurethral microwave thermotherapy. Thus, the latter seems to play a dominant role in the economic models used to assess the cost-efficiency of different treatment modalities for benign prostatic hyperplasia. SUMMARY: The recent innovations in high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy provide better and more durable clinical outcomes and lower morbidity, and strengthen its position as an established treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia. However, there is always room for improvement, so further research on therapeutic protocols, treatment monitoring and selection criteria are to be welcomed.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Transpupillary thermotherapy in the management of circumscribed choroidal hemangioma.

Laser photocoagulation and various radiation therapy methods have been used in the treatment of circumscribed choroidal hemangioma that produce visual loss. Recently, transpupillary thermotherapy has been employed in the management of choroidal hemangioma. Thirty-six cases of choroidal hemangioma treated with transpupillary thermotherapy are reviewed. Twenty-eight cases were reported in the literature and 10 cases were managed by the author. Transpupillary thermotherapy has been used as a primary treatment (36 cases) or secondary treatment (2 cases) for choroidal hemangioma. The goal of transpupillary thermotherapy is to achieve resolution of exudative detachment of the fovea and improvement of vision. In all eyes the foveal detachment subsided. In 26 eyes having pretreatment visual acuity >or=0.05 (20/400), the visual acuity increased in 20 (77%) eyes and remained unchanged in 6 (23%) eyes. After transpupillary thermotherapy, 16 (42%) cases showed complete regression, 20 (53%) demonstrated partial regression, and in 2 (5%) there was no change in tumor thickness at follow-ups ranging from 2 to 44 months. Complications of transpupillary thermotherapy of choroidal hemangioma included cystoid macular edema (3 eyes), preretinal fibrosis (2 eyes), focal iris atrophy (3 eyes), and retinal vascular occlusion (1 eye). Although the follow-up in many studies is limited, transpupillary thermotherapy has not been associated with any significant complications.

Choroid Neoplasms↗

PubMed1998

Comparison between interstitial laser thermotherapy and excision of an adenocarcinoma transplanted into rat liver.

The aim of this study was to compare interstitial laser thermotherapy with excision of a liver tumour. A dimethylhydrazine-induced adenocarcinoma was transplanted (implanted if not stated otherwise) into the left lateral lobe of the rat liver, and treatment was performed 8 days later. In the main experiment, rats were treated with resection of the tumour-bearing lobe or underwent interstitial laser thermotherapy, which was performed at a steady-state temperature of 46 degrees C for 30 min, 3 mm from the tumour margin. The incidence and extent of intraperitoneal spread was smaller after laser thermotherapy than after resection of the tumour-bearing lobe, with no difference in local control. Metastatic spread after resection of the median liver lobe was similar to that observed after sham procedures for thermotherapy or resection, suggesting that the advantage of thermotherapy was not due to a difference in surgical trauma. Additional studies showed that laser thermotherapy reduced intraperitoneal spread when treatment was suboptimal or in a tumour inoculation model and suggested that immunological mechanisms might be involved. It is concluded that interstitial laser thermotherapy reduces spread of liver tumour compared with resection.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2005

Efficacy of thermotherapy to treat cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania tropica in Kabul, Afghanistan: a randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Pentavalent antimony is the agent recommended for treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL). Its use is problematic, because it is expensive and because of the potential for drug-associated adverse effects during a lengthy and painful treatment course. METHODS: We tested the efficacy of thermotherapy for the treatment of CL due to Leishmania tropica in a randomized, controlled trial in Kabul, Afghanistan. We enrolled 401 patients with a single CL lesion and administered thermotherapy using radio-frequency waves (1 treatment of >or=1 consecutive application at 50 degrees C for 30 s) or sodium stibogluconate (SSG), administered either intralesionally (a total of 5 injections of 2-5 mL every 5-7 days, depending on lesion size) or intramuscularly (20 mg/kg daily for 21 days). RESULTS: Cure, defined as complete reepithelialization at 100 days after treatment initiation, was observed in 75 (69.4%) of 108 patients who received thermotherapy, 70 (75.3%) of 93 patients who received intralesional SSG, and 26 (44.8%) of 58 patients who received intramuscular SSG. The OR for cure with thermotherapy was 2.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-5.41), compared with intramuscular SSG treatment (P=.002). No statistically significant difference was observed in the odds of cure in comparison of intralesional SSG and thermotherapy treatments. The OR for cure with intralesional SSG treatment was 3.75 (95% CI, 1.86-7.54), compared with intramuscular SSG treatment (P<.001). The time to cure was significantly shorter in the thermotherapy group (median, 53 days) than in the intralesional SSG or intramuscularly SSG group (median, 75 days and >100 days, respectively; P=.003). CONCLUSIONS: Thermotherapy is an effective, comparatively well-tolerated, and rapid treatment for CL, and it should be considered as an alternative to antimony treatment.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Current status of thermotherapy of the prostate.

PURPOSE: We reviewed the available data on transurethral microwave thermotherapy in the treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Furthermore we provide a perspective of this minimally invasive treatment modality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To our knowledge all previously reported data from clinical trials of transurethral microwave thermotherapy for BPH are reviewed. RESULTS: Transurethral microwave thermotherapy was designed to apply microwave energy deep within lateral prostatic lobes while simultaneously cooling the urethral mucosa, thus enabling an outpatient based anesthesia-free procedure. Lower energy protocols using the Prostraton device provide significant symptomatic improvement and improvement in maximum flow of approximately 35% over baseline. Similar changes are being documented with other transurethral microwave thermotherapy devices. Higher energy protocols using the Prostatron device result in symptomatic improvement similar to that of lower energy protocols, while improvement in uroflowmetry is much more pronounced. However, the latter effect is achieved at the expense of increased morbidity. Second generation protocols have not yet been documented by users of the other thermotherapy devices. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous studies unequivocally support the efficacy and safety of transurethral microwave thermotherapy for treatment of symptomatic BPH. Significant improvement in objective and subjective parameters has been realized with transurethral microwave thermotherapy at multiple centers in the United States and Europe.

Clinical Protocols↗

PubMed2007

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy: from evidence-based medicine to clinical practice.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this article is to provide new clinical data on transurethral microwave thermotherapy, evaluate it in the perspective of evidence-based guidelines and daily practice and investigate the driving forces that determine the current position of thermotherapy for the management of benign prostatic obstruction. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have provided significant evidence regarding the efficacy, safety and durability of thermotherapy. Updated evidence-based clinical guidelines on the management of patients with benign prostatic obstruction have been made available. Surveys have evaluated the acceptance of transurethral microwave thermotherapy from the urological community. In addition, several studies have made major contributions to our knowledge of the translation of evidence to daily practice. SUMMARY: The range of therapeutic options for benign prostatic obstruction continues to widen creating the need for clarity in selection and application of these treatments. High-quality data on transurethral microwave thermotherapy have been published and integrated into clinical guidelines. Considerations on the implementation of guidelines to clinical practice, emergence of new treatments, shift of benign prostatic obstruction therapy, economics and the increasing need to treat patients with different clinical profile during the last decade seem to affect the position of transurethral microwave thermotherapy in the armamentarium of a urological centre. Into this frame, transurethral microwave thermotherapy tailored to selective cases seems to remain an attractive option.

Evidence-Based Medicine↗