SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “TRAVEL”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

Increasing referral of at-risk travelers to travel health clinics: evaluation of a health promotion intervention targeted to travel agents.

BACKGROUND: Increases in travel-related illness require new partnerships to ensure travelers are prepared for health risks abroad. The travel agent is one such partner and efforts to encourage travel agents to refer at-risk travelers to travel health clinics may help in reducing travel-attributable morbidity. METHODS: A health promotion intervention encouraging travel agents to refer at-risk travelers to travel health clinics was evaluated. Information on the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of travel agents before and after the intervention was compared using two self-administered questionnaires. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the mean difference in overall scores to evaluate the overall impact of the intervention and also subscores for each of the behavioral construct groupings (attitudes, barriers, intent, and subjective norms). Multiple regression techniques were used to evaluate which travel agent characteristics were independently associated with a stronger effect of the intervention. RESULTS: A small improvement in travel agents overall attitudes and beliefs (p =.03) was found, in particular their intention to refer (p =.01). Sixty-five percent of travel agents self-reported an increase in referral behavior; owners or managers of the agency were significantly more likely to do so than other travel agents (OR = 7.25; 95% CI: 1.64 32.06). Older travel agents, those that worked longer hours and those with some past referral experience, had significantly higher post-intervention scores. CONCLUSIONS: Travel agents can be willing partners in referral, and agencies should be encouraged to develop specific referral policies. Future research may be directed toward investigating the role of health education in certification curricula, the effectiveness of different types of health promotion interventions, including Internet-facilitated interventions, and the direct impact that such interventions would have on travelers attending travel health clinics.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Mefloquine for preventing malaria in non-immune adult travellers.

OBJECTIVES: Mefloquine has now largely replaced earlier malaria prophylaxis drugs which are no longer considered to be effective against all Plasmodium species, due to parasite resistance. However mefloquine may be associated with neuropsychological harmful effects. The objective of this review was to assess the effects of mefloquine in adult travellers. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group trials register, Medline, Embase, Lilacs, Science Citation Index and reference lists of articles. We contacted researchers in the subject of malaria chemoprophylaxis, and drug companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing mefloquine with other standard prophylaxis or placebo in non-immune adult travellers. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were also contacted. MAIN RESULTS: Ten trials involving 2750 non-immune adult travellers were included. One trial comparing mefloquine with placebo showed mefloquine prevented malaria episodes in an area of drug resistance (odds ratio 0.04, 95% confidence interval 0.02 to 0.08). Withdrawals in the mefloquine group were consistently higher in four placebo controlled trials (odds ratio 3. 56, 95% confidence interval 1.67 to 7.60). In five trials comparing mefloquine with other chemoprophylaxis, no difference in tolerability was detected. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Mefloquine prevents malaria, but there is not enough evidence to evaluate its tolerability and toxicity, particularly for general travellers.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Travel Illness and the Family Practitioner: A Retrospective Assessment of Travel-Induced Illness in General Practice and the Effect of a Travel Illness Clinic.

As the recognition of the discipline of Travel Medicine grows with increased international travel, an examination of both the value of pretravel advice as well as the general practitioner's role in preparation for, care during, and diagnosis and treatment after travel is necessary. This study was conducted to determine the incidence of travel-related illness in a typical urban population in Scotland and to examine the efficacy of our pretravel clinic related to reduction of illness, preparedness of our patients for travel, and the effects of our travel clinic on the workload generated by the returning ill in our practice. In this retrospective study, 1568 patients, presenting within a 1-year period from 1992-1993 at a medical practice and 100 patients at a travel clinic were studied. Their morbidity rates and, therefore, the effect of the travel clinic on prophylaxis and pretravel advice were determined. In the practice sample, 42% of travelers became ill while abroad, with 48% of ill travelers returning to consult their family doctor at home. Travelers to Africa and Asia were shown to have the highest rates of illness. Travel clinic attendees were more likely to be traveling to high-risk destinations, but were better prepared, experiencing a significantly lower rate of illness during travel (22%). Clinic attendees were less likely to consult their doctor on return home, preferring instead to resolve their illness by self-medication. The results suggest that travel clinics significantly reduce the morbidity of illness for travelers and that the burden on general practices could be reduced with the pretravel advice and prophylaxis that travel clinics can provide.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1991

Pre-travel health, immunization status, and demographics of travel to the developing world for individuals visiting a travel medicine service.

It is estimated that five million Americans will travel to the developing world over the next year. This study examines the demographic profile, past medical and immunization history, itinerary, and reason for travel of 2, 445 travelers to the developing world seen at a travel medicine service from 1984 through 1989. The travelers age ranged from three months to 85 years (mean age 43). A chronic medical condition was reported by 654 (27%). Four percent of all travelers were intolerant of sulfonamides, and 9% had contraindications to mefloquine for malaria prophylaxis. Many travelers were due to receive the primary series or updatings of routinely recommended immunizations: 43% for tetanus/diphtheria, 55% of those born after 1956 for measles, and 70% for polio if their travel itinerary included a polio risk. Most travel (71%) was for vacations, 13% was for teaching or study, 11% for business, and 5% for missionary activities. The median duration of travel was 21 days; 5% traveled for more than one year. While over 150 countries were visited, 52% of all travel was to 10 countries in East Africa, the Indian subcontinent, the Far East, and South America. Information about the epidemiology of travel to the developing world can help physicians and travel medicine services develop more effective preventive measures for travelers.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1992

[Self-medication of 193 travelers in the tropics. Recommendations for clinical counseling of tropical travelers and organization of a tropical travel pharmacy].

Medical advice for the traveller is of increasing importance since in the past decade in industrialized countries there is a steady increase in numbers of travellers and distance travelled. Self medication was evaluated in 193 travellers to malaria-endemic areas. Diarrhoea, fever and headache were the most frequent symptoms. Antidiarrhoeal agents, analgetics/antipyretics, antibiotics and oral contraceptives were the drugs most often used by travellers. One case of mefloquine-resistant and chloroquine-sensitive Plasmodium falciparum malaria acquired in West Africa was reported, another patient took pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine because of suspected malarial fever. The main reasons for drug consumption in travellers to tropical and subtropical areas are functionally divided into 4 groups: vaccination and prophylaxis, medication during the outward and return journey, illness occurring during stay abroad and long-term medication. This classification should be considered when medical advice is given for travellers and is the basis for choosing the contents of a pocket dispensary for travellers.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1994

The impact of travel acquired illness on the world traveller and family doctor and the need for pre-travel health education.

This retrospective study involved a 20% quota, age and sex stratified sample of people over 16 years of age, presenting to a group medical practice over a period of one year (N = 1568). A standardised, computer-scored, self-report questionnaire was administered. The response rate was 98.3%. 42% of respondents had travelled outwith the UK in the previous year. Of those, 42% had become ill whilst abroad. In 20.5% of cases the illness settled without treatment. However, 26% of the patients required consultation with a doctor whilst abroad and 48.4% of those becoming ill required further attention from the family doctor on return home. 5% of ill travellers were admitted to hospital abroad. 8% of all travellers did not have medical insurance cover. A large and significant population of travellers become ill whilst abroad, and travel-acquired illness has a large impact on general practice, with 1 in 5 travellers seeking GP consultation on return home. Improved practice-generated pre-travel health advice might decrease this burden on primary care.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The pre-travel medical evaluation: the traveler with chronic illness and the geriatric traveler.

The pre-travel medical evaluation of elderly patients and patients with chronic illness requires special assessment and advice. Screening and special precautions are reviewed for traveling patients with respiratory disease, cardiac disease, sinusitis, diabetes mellitus, HIV infection, and other chronic medical conditions. Current guidelines for empiric therapy and prophylaxis of travelers' diarrhea are reviewed, with emphasis on concerns in geriatric or chronically ill travelers. Special considerations such as potential drug-drug interactions and insurance coverage are also discussed.

Aged↗

PubMed1999

Travel health: perceptions and practices of travel consultants.

BACKGROUND: The global increase in international travel puts travelers at risk of travel-related morbidity and mortality. Prior to travel, most travelers have contact with a travel agency, thereby providing an opportunity for intervention. With this in mind we aimed to determine some of the travel-related health knowledge, practices and needs of travel consultants. METHODS: A cross sectional study was undertaken in which one travel consultant from each of 166 Western Australian travel agencies was asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-five travel agencies (87%) agreed to participate in the study. Fifty-six percent indicated that they "usually" gave broad travel-related health guidelines and recommended their clients consult a medical practitioner. Almost all travel consultants reported discussing travel health insurance; very few provided information on sexually transmissible diseases, the risks associated with drug use, or first aid kits. Over 80% responded correctly to statements eliciting their knowledge on yellow fever, malaria, and food safety; the majority incorrectly answered questions on dengue fever and altitude sickness. Fifty-six percent of respondents thought that there was "not enough" readily accessible travel health information; 52% said they would like to be more involved in providing health information to their clients. CONCLUSIONS: Contact between travelers and travel agents offers an opportunity to promote awareness of travel-related health hazards. While travel consultants' health knowledge on some topics is adequate, in other areas it is inconsistent. Many travel consultants in Western Australia expressed a willingness to be involved in future health promotion activities. This participation may be best nurtured by providing travel consultants with: (1) better health education so they are able to identify high-risk travelers and destinations for medical referral; and, (2) health information in a format they feel comfortable distributing to their clients.

Cross-Sectional Studies↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Travel insurance claims made by travelers from Australia.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about travel insurance claims made by travelers returning from abroad. This study was designed to investigate travel insurance claims made by travelers from Australia, particularly examining demographic factors, type of travel insurance coverage, nature and duration of travel, when treatment was sought during travel or when the problem arose, use of emergency assistance, nature of claim, and claim outcome, including cost. METHODS: A random sample of approximately one in five claims reported during the period 1996 to 1998 to a major Australian travel insurance company were examined. RESULTS: A total of 855 claims were examined, of which 42.6% (356/836) were made by male travelers and 57.1% (477/836) were made by female travelers. The majority of claimants were in the 55 years and over age groups (445/836, 53.2%). Medical and dental conditions accounted for 66.6% of claims (569/854), with the remainder associated with loss, theft, and damage (285/854, 33.4%). The most common medical conditions were respiratory (110/539, 20.4%), musculoskeletal (90/539, 16.7%), gastrointestinal (75/539, 13.9%), ear, nose, and throat (67/539, 12.4%), and dental conditions (39/539, 7.2%). Only one case of venous thrombosis was reported, secondary to a lower limb infection. Use of the travel insurance company's emergency telephone service was reported in 17.1% of claims (146/853). Almost two-thirds (559/853, 65.5%) of claims were fully accepted. Those who claimed medical treatment, assault, and theft were significantly more likely to have their claims accepted compared to those claiming dental conditions, cancellation, curtailment, loss and damage (chi2 = 127.78, df = 40, p <.00001). The majority of medical and dental conditions did not require further medical investigations (427/569, 75.0%). The mean cost of claim refunds was Australian dollars (AUD)991.31 (standard deviation [SD] 6 AUD5400.76) for males and AUD508.90 (SD 6 AUD1446.10) for females. Claims for assault, cancellation, and curtailment were significantly more expensive than other types of claims (Kruskal-Wallis one way analysis of variance [ANOVA]; chi2 = 106.87, df = 8, p <.00001). Claims for treatment of gastrointestinal, cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, musculoskeletal conditions, and pyrexias of unknown origin were significantly more expensive than other medical and dental claims (Kruskal-Wallis one way ANOVA; x2 = 61.68, df = 15, p <.00001). CONCLUSIONS: This explorative study highlights the importance of travelers taking out appropriate travel insurance. Claims for medical and dental conditions represent the majority of travel insurance claims made by Australian travelers returning from abroad, although travel insurance also covers against such contingencies as loss, theft, and cancellation. The most common medical conditions claimed were respiratory, musculoskeletal, and gastrointestinal disorders. Travelers should be advised to take out appropriate travel insurance before departure overseas and to take care with preexisting medical and dental conditions, which may not be able to be claimed against travel insurance.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Travel agents and the prevention of health problems among travelers in Québec.

BACKGROUND: Among the factors influencing travelers to seek preventive health advice before departure, the travel agent's recommendation plays an important role. The objective of our study was to document the practices and needs of travel agents in Québec (Canada) in relation to the prevention of health problems among travelers. METHODS: In June 2000, a cross-sectional descriptive survey was carried out among travel agents from all travel agencies in Québec. One agent per agency was asked to answer our questions. Data were collected using a 32-item telephone questionnaire. RESULTS: Altogether, 708 travel agents from the 948 agencies contacted answered our questionnaire (participation rate: 75%). Most respondents (81%) believed that the travel agent has a role to play in the prevention of health problems among travelers, especially to recommend that travelers consult a travel clinic before departure. Although over 80% of the agents interviewed mentioned recommending a visit to a travel clinic before an organized tour to Thailand or a backpacking trip in Mexico, less than half said they make the same recommendation for a stay in a seaside resort in Mexico. The majority of respondents were acquainted with the services offered in travel health clinics, and these clinics were the source of travel health information most often mentioned by travel agents. However, nearly 60% of the agents questioned had never personally consulted a travel clinic. When asked about the best way to receive information about travelers' health, more than 40% of respondents favoured receiving information newsletters from public health departments regularly whereas 28% preferred the Internet. CONCLUSION: Despite the limits of this study, our results should help the public health network better target its interventions aimed to inform travel agents on prevention of health problems among travelers.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Travellers' diarrhoea and the effect of pre-travel health advice in general practice.

BACKGROUND: Rates of travel-related diarrhoea vary from 8% to 50% depending on the country visited. Travellers' diarrhoea has social, health and economic costs. The impact of these may be reduced by relevant pre-travel advice. Little is known of the effect of pre-travel advice on the incidence of diarrhoea among travellers abroad. AIM: To determine the 'true' attack rate of travellers' diarrhoea and to assess the effectiveness of pre-travel health advice in reducing the incidence of diarrhoea and the need for subsequent GP consultation. METHOD: A retrospective study was carried out in a general practice in Stirling, Scotland, using a standardized, structured questionnaire to obtain demographic details and patients' home and foreign health experience in the previous 12 months. The questionnaire was administered to a 20% sample (n = 1771) of practice patients aged 16 years or over, stratified by age and sex. Main outcome measures were reported diarrhoeal illness while abroad, its management and outcome, and a record of diarrhoea in the two weeks prior to responding to the questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate was 97% (n = 1649). Of those responding, 44% had travelled abroad in the past 12 months; 39% of travellers reported having diarrhoea while abroad, while 6% of the same group reported diarrhoea in the two weeks prior to being questioned; 9.7% of non-travellers reported diarrhoea in the two weeks prior to being questioned. Travellers were 6.5 times more likely to experience diarrhoea while abroad than when spending a comparable 2-week period at home. Travellers who had sought pre-travel advice were more likely to be travelling to a high-risk destination (P < 0.0001) and were more likely to suffer diarrhoea while abroad (P < 0.05); however, they were less likely to need medical help while abroad or on their return (P < 0.0001). The results indicate a markedly higher attack rate of diarrhoea in patients travelling abroad than would be expected if they stayed at home. CONCLUSION: Pre-travel advice does reduce the need for medical assistance while abroad; it also reduces GP work-load in terms of post-travel health consultations with returning travellers.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1994

Specialized Travel Consultation Part I: Travelers' Prior Knowledge.

Studies have shown that more than one third of all travelers to tropical countries experience an illness while abroad. Naiveté about diseases, such as malaria, travelers' diarrhea, cholera, and HIV infections, appears to be the most crucial factor determining travel-related morbidity rates. A study was designed both to evaluate the level of disease-related, pretravel knowledge prior to a specialized travel clinic consultation as well as to correlate the level of knowledge with demographic and travel variables and previous travel experience. Using a self-administered questionnaire, data were collected from 167 clients who attended the Hospital for Tropical Diseases Travel Clinic, London, England, in June 1991. The questionnaire evaluated clients' knowledge and attitudes of travel-related diseases, their prevention and treatment, and the scores were analyzed using the Statistical Analysis System software, Version 5. Predictors for increased knowledge scores were examined by a one-way layout model comparing disease knowledge scores with variables such as sex, age, socioeconomic class, ethnic background, previous travel experience, type and duration of travel, destination, accommodation quality, and health insurance coverage. A step-down regression model was constructed to control for the effects of the many mutually confounding factors. Travelers' diarrhea and malaria risk at destination were acknowledged by more than 85% of the respondents, and 60% of the questions on travelers' diarrhea prevention, compared to 81% of those on malaria prevention, were answered correctly. Significantly, however, only one half of the respondents indicated that they would take appropriate measures concerning diarrhea while abroad. Stepwise regression identified previous travel experience, pretravel advice, traveling for work purposes, and using backpack overland tours as significant predictors of high knowledge. This study points out the necessity of pretravel education and that it should focus not only on malaria but also on other travel-related diseases like travelers' diarrhea. As well, target groups for whom more detailed information should be provided are identified, including inexperienced travelers, those using organized tours and sleeping indoors, those planning to visit friends or relatives, and those who have not received sufficient pretravel health advice.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1995

A survey of notified travel-associated infections: implications for travel health advice.

BACKGROUND: Travel-associated illness affects at least 25 per cent of UK residents who travel abroad each year. Notified cases form only a small proportion of the total community burden of disease but nevertheless represent a substantial workload for community infection control services. The aim of the study was to describe the incidence of notified travel-associated infectious illness, the extent and sources of travel health advice, and the nature of risk-avoiding behaviour in that population. METHOD: A questionnaire survey was carried out of 190 consecutive notifications of food poisoning and malaria over a nine-month period where travel abroad was an identifiable factor. RESULTS: The incidence of notified travel-associated food poisoning during the study period was 204 per million resident population per year. Thirteen per cent of respondents reported taking no precautions against food poisoning, and up to 75 per cent of the cases could have taken better precautions. Only 36 per cent of cases recalled advice from their travel agent. Half the cases did not visit their general practitioner before travel (20 per cent of travellers to high-risk destinations). There was a strong association between receiving advice before travelling and risk-avoiding behaviour. The source of advice did not appear to affect the extent of precautions taken. The cases clearly expressed a need for additional written travel health information in the appropriate style and language for their ethnic group. Ethnic minority cases utilized official travel health advice to the same extent as the Caucasian cases. CONCLUSION: In this case series, 75 per cent of travellers did not take sufficient basic precautions against infection. There was a need to improve advice about simple precautions to avoid infection. General practice was the commonest source of advice for the travellers in this study. The apparently low level of advice from travel agents needs to be addressed in any local initiative to improve the health of travellers.

Chi-Square Distribution↗

PubMed2002

International business travel: impact on families and travellers.

OBJECTIVES: Spouses and staff of the World Bank Group (WBG) were questioned about the impact of international business travel on families and travellers. Dependent variables were self reported stress, concern about the health of the traveller, and negative impact on the family. We hypothesised that several travel factors (independent variables) would be associated with these impacts. These travel factors had to do with the frequency, duration, and predictability of travel and its interference with family activities. METHODS: Survey forms were developed and distributed to all spouses of travelling staff as well as a small sample of operational staff. Kendall's tau b correlation coefficients of response frequencies were computed with the data from scaled items. Written responses to open ended questions were categorised. RESULTS: Response rates for spouses and staff were 24% and 36%, respectively. Half the spouse sample (n=533) and almost 75% of the staff sample (n=102) reported high or very high stress due to business travel. Self reported spouse stress was associated with six out of eight travel factors. Female spouses, those with children, and younger spouses reported greater stress. Self reported staff stress was significantly associated with four out of nine travel factors. Further insight into how business travel affects families and staff (including children's behavioural changes) and how families cope was gained through responses to written questions. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the notion that lengthy and frequent travel and frequent changes in travel dates which affect family plans, all characteristic of WBG missions, negatively affects many spouses and children (particularly young children) and that the strain on families contributes significantly to the stress staff feel about their travel. Policies or management practices that take into consideration family activities and give staff greater leeway in controlling and refusing travel may help relieve stress.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

PubMedDate not supplied

A population-based comparison between travelers who consulted travel clinics and those who did not.

BACKGROUND: Travel to hepatitis A-endemic countries is frequent among North Americans. Such travel carries significant risks for the individuals themselves and for the general population. We documented the patterns of use of travel clinics in a large Canadian adult population. METHODS: Travelers who had visited a hepatitis A-endemic country between 1990 and the time of the survey in 1999 were eligible. Subjects were identified from a representative sample of 4,002 adults from the two largest Canadian provinces. They were contacted by random digit dialing and interviewed by telephone. RESULTS: Only 15% of trips had been preceded by a visit to a travel clinic. The probability of visiting a travel clinic was approximately 10 times greater for travelers considered to be in the high-risk category than for those in the low-risk category, but the former represented only 2% of the total. The probability of visiting a travel clinic was approximately 23 times greater for travelers who were aware of the health risks in their country of destination. Income level was not associated with attendance at a travel clinic, and cost was rarely mentioned as a reason for not attending such a travel clinic before departure. CONCLUSIONS: Each year, millions of Canadian travelers go to hepatitis A-endemic countries without consulting a travel clinic. Active steps must be taken by public health authorities to improve their utilization of health services and prevent the accrued health risk for these travelers.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Preparing patients to travel abroad safely. Part 1: Taking a travel history and identifying special risks.

OBJECTIVE: To present for family physicians without access to a travel clinic and the Internet the questions to ask about the medical history and itinerary of their patients traveling abroad. To suggest ways to identify and advise high-risk patients. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: MEDLINE searches from 1990 to November 1998 located 51 articles on travel and diabetes, 37 on travel and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), 63 on travel and heart disease, 192 on travel and pregnancy, and 298 on travel with infants or children. Additional searches were undertaken in September 1999. The quality of evidence in most articles is level III (expert opinion). There are no randomized controlled trials of the best advice for family physicians to give travelers. MAIN MESSAGE: A history should include countries to be visited, planned activities, previous tropical travel, medical history, vaccination status, whether children are traveling, pregnancy status, and patients' opinions of the risks and precautions needed. Detailed advice should be given to reduce risks. The main causes of mortality abroad are existing cardiovascular conditions and accidents. High-risk conditions to be identified in travelers are cardiovascular illness, COPD, diabetes, immunodeficiency, pregnancy, and traveling with children. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cardiovascular illness or COPD should be advised to avoid too much exertion while traveling. Detailed instruction should be given to diabetic patients on how to maintain stable glucose levels, to pregnant women on avoiding malarial infection, and to parents on protecting their children from infections and accidents.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗

PubMed2001

Travel insurance claims made by travellers from Australia for dental conditions.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about dental problems suffered by travellers abroad. This study was designed to investigate travel insurance claims made by travellers from Australia for dental conditions, particularly examining demographic factors, type of travel insurance coverage, nature and duration of travel, when dental treatment was sought during travel, use of emergency assistance, type of treatment, and claim outcome, including cost. METHODS: 1,289 claims submitted during 1998-99 to a major Australian-based travel insurance company were examined for dental claims. RESULTS: 104 (8.1%) claims for dental conditions were submitted, of which 45 (43.3%) were made by male and 59 (56.7%) by female travellers. The majority of claimants were in the 60 years and over age group 54 (52.4%). Dental conditions reported required conservative (mostly fillings) 31 (29.8%), endodontic (mostly root canal treatment) 19 (18.3%), prosthodontic 27 (26.0%), periodontal 8 (7.7%), oral and maxillofacial surgery 2 (1.9%) and other or multiple 17 (16.3%) treatments. Use of the travel insurance emergency telephone service for dental conditions was reported in only seven cases (6.7%). Almost two-thirds 64 (61.5%) of claims were accepted. Claims for prosthodontic treatment were significantly less likely to be accepted. The majority of dental conditions did not require further medical investigations, 74 (71.2%). The mean cost of payouts to claims was AU$238.06 for males and AU$182.58 for females. Claims for endodontic and prosthodontic treatment were significantly more expensive than other types of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Claims for dental conditions represent a noteworthy proportion of travel insurance claims made by Australian travellers abroad. More than three-quarters of claims for dental conditions were for conservative, endodontic or prosthodontic treatment. Travellers should be advised to have a dental check-up before departure overseas and to take care with pre-existing dental conditions, which may not be able to be claimed on travel insurance.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Promoting travel clinic referrals: exploring partnerships for healthier travel.

Many travellers are unaware or unprepared for the health-related risks of international travel. Indeed, studies of travel-related morbidity have estimated that between 15 and 45% of travellers to tropical and sub-tropical destinations experience a variety of mild to severe clinical symptoms during their travel. While some inadequacies may exist in the pre-travel health advice provided by travel clinics, recent studies have suggested that these clinics are more effective in promoting health awareness and consequently in preventing illness than more traditional health services. Unfortunately, traveller attendance records at pre-travel health clinics are poor. This situation suggests that new partnerships must be developed which encourage healthier travel by promoting the pre-departure use of travel health clinic services. The intent of this paper is to generate discussion as well as to initiate research into the development and evaluation of new partnerships to promote healthier travel.

Counseling↗