PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Tadalafil”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Comparison of efficacy, safety, and tolerability of on-demand tadalafil and daily dosed tadalafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the efficacy of on-demand tadalafil and daily tadalafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 145 men with a mean age of 57.3 years (range 19-82 years) and mild to severe erectile dysfunction of various etiologies were randomized to receive on-demand tadalafil (20 mg) or daily tadalafil (10 mg) taken without food or alcohol restrictions in a trial lasting 26 weeks. The three primary outcome measures were changes from baseline in the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), the proportion of "yes" responses to questions 2 and 3 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP). Additional efficacy instruments included a Global Assessment Question administered at completion of the study. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, on-demand and daily tadalafil enhanced all efficacy outcomes. Patients receiving on-demand tadalafil (20 mg) and daily tadalafil (10 mg) experienced a significant mean improvement of 8.3 and 11.9, respectively, in the erectile function domain of the IIEF from baseline (P < 0.001). The mean change from baseline was significantly higher for daily dosed tadalafil than for on-demand tadalafil (P < 0.05). Sexual intercourse was successfully completed (SEP3) in 69% and 84% of patients taking on-demand tadalafil and daily tadalafil, respectively, compared with 30% at baseline (P < 0.001). Successful completion of sexual intercourse was statistically higher for daily tadalafil than for on-demand tadalafil (P < 0.05). Treatment with on-demand tadalafil or daily tadalafil was well tolerated, and headaches, facial flushing, and dyspepsia were the most frequently observed adverse events. CONCLUSION: Tadalafil was effective and well tolerated in this patient population. Treatment with daily tadalafil was associated with a significantly higher IIEF erectile function domain score and completion of successful intercourse compared with on-demand tadalafil.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Efficacy and safety of daily tadalafil in men with erectile dysfunction previously unresponsive to on-demand tadalafil.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of daily tadalafil, a potent selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) in men previously unresponsive to on-demand tadalafil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 112 men with a mean age of 63 (range 21-79) and moderate to severe ED of various aetiologies were treated with tadalafil, taken on a daily basis at flexible daily doses of 10 and 20 mg for 12 weeks. The three primary outcomes were changes from the pretreatment and on-demand tadalafil baseline in the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function and the proportion of yes responses to questions 2 and 3 of the Sexual Encounter Profile. Additional efficacy instruments included a Global Assessment Question administered at completion of the study. RESULTS: Compared with pretreatment and on-demand tadalafil baseline, daily dosed tadalafil significantly enhanced all efficacy outcome variables. Patients receiving daily tadalafil (10 mg) experienced a significant mean improvement of 12.8 and 8.2 in the International Index of Erectile Function erectile function domain score from baseline (P < 0.001) and from on-demand tadalafil, respectively (P < 0.001). Fifty-eight percent of intercourse attempts (Sexual Encounter Profile question 3) were successfully completed (P < 0.001 vs. pretreatment baseline, P < 0.001 vs. on-demand tadalafil). Improved erections at end point were reported by 69% of men compared with 42% of men with on-demand tadalafil. Daily tadalafil was well tolerated with headache, dyspepsia, and facial flushing as the most frequent adverse events. CONCLUSION: Daily tadalafil (10/20 mg) was effective and well tolerated in this study population and is an effective salvage for previous on-demand tadalafil nonresponders.

3',5'-Cyclic-GMP Phosphodiesterases↗
PubMed2006

Cardiovascular safety update of Tadalafil: retrospective analysis of data from placebo-controlled and open-label clinical trials of Tadalafil with as needed, three times-per-week or once-a-day dosing.

Because most men with erectile dysfunction have underlying vascular disease, it is important to update the cardiovascular safety profile of medications used in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. This retrospective analysis evaluated serious cardiovascular treatment-emergent adverse events (CVTEAEs) reported in 36 clinical trials of tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. A serious CVTEAE was defined as myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or cerebrovascular death. In the 36 trials, 12,487 men (mean age 55 years) with erectile dysfunction received tadalafil, with 5,771 patient-years (PYs) of exposure, and 2,047 men (mean age 56 years) received placebo, with 460 PYs of exposure. Tadalafil 2 to 50 mg was taken as needed, 3 times/week, or once a day. Co-morbidities at baseline included hypertension (31%), diabetes (21%), hyperlipidemia (17%), and coronary artery disease (5%). Across all trials, the incidence rate of serious CVTEAEs was 0.40/100 PYs in tadalafil-treated patients and 0.43/100 PYs in placebo-treated patients. In patients taking tadalafil as needed, 3 times/week, or once a day, the incidence rates of serious CVTEAEs ranged from 0.17 to 0.54/100 PYs across placebo-controlled and open-label trials. In conclusion, the incidence rates of serious CVTEAEs were comparable among men with erectile dysfunction taking tadalafil as needed, 3 times/week, or once a day, and these rates were also comparable with those in placebo-treated patients. In this clinical trial population of men with erectile dysfunction, tadalafil was not associated with an increased risk for serious cardiovascular adverse events.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Tadalafil is efficacious in Black American and Hispanic men with erectile dysfunction: results from multiple observations in men with erectile dysfunction in national tadalafil study in the US (MOMENTUS).

To show that tadalafil is efficacious in Black American and Hispanic men with erectile dysfunction (ED) and efficacy is noninferior to that in Caucasian men. Multiple observations in men with ED in national tadalafil study in the US, a multicenter, open-label study, assessed the efficacy of tadalafil 20 mg taken as needed (maximum one dose/day before sexual activity) for 12 weeks by patients with ED in various populations. This analysis focuses on three groups: Caucasian (Reference group), Black American, and Hispanic men. Primary measurement of efficacy was change from baseline in erectile function (EF) domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and the primary analysis was whether efficacy in Black American and Hispanic groups was noninferior to efficacy in the Caucasian group. Secondary efficacy measures included sexual encounter profile (SEP), IIEF intercourse satisfaction (IS) and overall satisfaction (OS) domains, Global Assessment Question (GAQ), and Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scale (PAIRS). Safety was assessed from adverse events (AEs) reported by all enrolled patients. The increase in IIEF EF domain score (>or=9.5) from baseline for each group was statistically significant (P<0.001) and clinically relevant. Efficacy of tadalafil in Black American and Hispanic patients was noninferior to the Caucasian group. IS and OS domains of IIEF had a statistically significant increase from baseline (P<0.001). Change from baseline in positive responses to SEP questions for each group was significant (P<0.001). At least 77% of intercourse attempts were successful over various time intervals up to 36 h postdose. At least 88% of patients in the various groups had a positive response to GAQ1. Improvement from baseline in Sexual Self-Confidence and Spontaneity domains of PAIRS was statistically significant (P<0.001). A low number of AEs and a low AE-related discontinuation rate (2.3%) were reported in all groups. Tadalafil 20 mg was as efficacious in Black American and Hispanic men with ED as in Caucasian patients and was well tolerated.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Tadalafil and modifications in peak systolic velocity (Doppler spectrum dynamic analysis) in the cavernosal arteries of patients with type 2 diabetes after continuous tadalafil treatment.

AIM: In this study peak systolic velocity (PSV) was measured by penile duplex Doppler spectrum dynamic analysis in diabetic patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) administered continuous treatment with tadalafil for 3 months in a weekly regimen (Monday-Wednesday-Friday). Responses to the Structured Interview on Erectile Dysfunction (SIEDY) questionnaire and hormonal blood levels (LH, testosterone, prolactin) were studied before and after treatment. METHODS: The study sample was 20 diabetic patients (mean age 60 years; range 55-65) with organic vascular arterial ED at enrollment into the study. All patients were eligible for receiving tadalafil. Patients were randomly assigned to 2 different treatment groups according to a computer-generated list. The first random set of numbers was assigned to group A, the second to group B. Group A (n=10) received tadalafil 20 mg per os on demand for 3 months (Cialis, Lilly ICOS; London, UK). Group B (n=10) received tadalafil 20 mg per os on weekly fixed days (Monday-Wednesday-Friday) for 3 months. All patients underwent duplex penile sonographic dynamic evaluation after intracavernosal injection of alprostadil 20 microg (Caverject, Pharmacia SpA; Milan, Italy); SIEDY questionnaire responses and changes in blood hormonal levels (LH, testosterone, prolactin) before and after treatment were compared. RESULTS: Increased PSV at 10 min and 20 min after alprostadil administration was found in 30% of Group A patients and in 60% of Group B patients. In 40% of Group B patients, the increase in PSV was so significant as to justify reclassification to a less severe diagnostic category (Benson classification) in vascular profile. No changes in hormonal levels after treatment were found in either group. Analysis of the questionnaires showed a more marked reduction in the global total scores in Group B, with a greater frequency and a clearer improvement in global scores. CONCLUSIONS: This study on a group of 20 patients with organic vascular arterial ED disclosed at least 2 basic aspects: 1) a higher percentage of Group B patients (fixed-day treatment regimen) showed a greater improvement in PSV than the controls; 40% of these patients were reclassified according to the Benson classification; 2) within the context of a clinical study, monitoring and supportive care to increase the frequency and quality of sexual intercourse led to a resumption of and a greater interest in sexual activity. This finding cannot be explained by changes in hormonal levels; instead, there appeared a sort of effect placebo that the continuous therapy, like conventional treatment for other health reasons, had on the patient.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Cardiovascular effects of tadalafil.

To determine the effects of tadalafil on the cardiovascular system, safety assessments were performed on a database of >4000 subjects who received tadalafil in >60 clinical pharmacology, phase 2, phase 3, and open-label studies. In healthy subjects, tadalafil resulted in small changes in blood pressure, which are not believed to be clinically relevant. Daily administration of tadalafil 20 mg for 26 weeks in healthy male subjects or patients with mild erectile dysfunction resulted in blood pressure changes similar to those observed after placebo administration. In patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), tadalafil administration before nitrate administration resulted in small decreases in blood pressure. The resulting mean maximal change in standing systolic blood pressure (SBP) after coadministration of sublingual nitroglycerin in patients with chronic stable angina was -36 mm Hg for tadalafil 5 mg, -31 mm Hg for tadalafil 10 mg, and -28 mm Hg for placebo. In addition, a larger number of men had a standing SBP <85 mm Hg after coadministration of sublingual nitroglycerin and tadalafil 5 mg (p <0.001 vs placebo) or tadalafil 10 mg (p <0.01 vs placebo) compared with coadministration with placebo. In patients with chronic stable angina taking doses of isosorbide mononitrate on a long-term basis, the mean maximal change in standing SBP was -23 mm Hg for placebo, -23 mm Hg for tadalafil 5 mg, and -26 mm Hg for tadalafil 10 mg. In a study of older subjects (>or=55 years of age) with no overt evidence of CAD, the resulting mean maximal change in standing SBP after coadministration of sublingual nitroglycerin was -25 mm Hg for tadalafil 10 mg, -29 mm Hg for sildenafil 50 mg, and -25 mm Hg for placebo. Cardiac mortality rates in tadalafil studies are consistent with the expected rate in this male population. Across all studies, the incidence rate of myocardial infarction was low in tadalafil-treated patients (0.43 per 100 patient-years) compared with patients who received placebo (0.6 per 100 patient-years), and the incidence rate was comparable to that observed in the age-standardized male population (0.60 per 100 patient-years). The incidence rate of presumed thrombotic strokes in tadalafil studies (0.27 per 100 patient-years) is comparable to the expected rate in this patient population. The data presented herein suggest that tadalafil can be safely used by healthy subjects and by patients with cardiovascular diseases. As with sildenafil, the use of tadalafil is contraindicated in patients receiving nitrate therapy because of the potential for significant hypotensive effects.

3',5'-Cyclic-GMP Phosphodiesterases↗
PubMed2004

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover study to evaluate patient preference between tadalafil and sildenafil.

PURPOSE: To assess patient preference for erectile dysfunction treatment between either sildenafil or tadalafil, each administered with their respective dosing instructions, and to evaluate preference for either sildenafil or tadalafil dosing instructions during tadalafil therapy. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, crossover study consisting of four treatment arms. Because the dosing instructions for sildenafil and tadalafil are different, a unique methodology using sham placebo arms was employed to maintain the blind. To assess drug preference, 219 patients were randomized to either sildenafil 50 mg or tadalafil 20 mg, with dosing instructions reflecting their respective product profiles. To assess dosing instruction preference during tadalafil therapy, 46 patients were randomized to tadalafil 20 mg with either tadalafil or sildenafil dosing instructions. After 12 weeks, patients were crossed-over. After 4 weeks of each treatment, all patients following sildenafil dosing instructions were offered the opportunity for an upward dose titration. In a double-blind fashion, all patients who requested an upward titration received additional capsules. To mimic the pattern of dose usage observed in clinical practice, the number of patients who received additional double-blind active medication was limited to 35% of patients taking sildenafil in each treatment period in each country. Following the crossover treatment period, patients chose their preferred double-blind treatment with dosing instructions to receive in the 12-week extension period. RESULTS: In the drug preference assessment, 132 of 181 (73%) evaluable patients chose to receive tadalafil (p < 0.001) during the extension period. In the dosing instruction preference assessment, 24 of 36 (67%) evaluable patients preferred tadalafil with tadalafil dosing instructions (p = 0.046). Sildenafil and tadalafil were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In the doses utilized in this study, 73% of patients preferred tadalafil with tadalafil dosing instructions for the treatment of their erectile dysfunction over sildenafil with sildenafil dosing instructions. During tadalafil therapy, 67% of patients preferred tadalafil dosing instructions over sildenafil dosing instructions.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Update on clinical trials of tadalafil demonstrates no increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular disease and erectile dysfunction (ED) share similar risk factors and often occur concomitantly. Therefore, men with ED may be at increased risk for cardiovascular adverse events. AIM: The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the cardiovascular adverse events in clinical trials of tadalafil, an effective medication for the treatment of ED. METHODS: An integrated analysis of cardiovascular adverse events was performed on a database from 35 controlled clinical trials (placebo [N = 2,118] and tadalafil [N = 5,228]) and eight open-label trials of tadalafil (tadalafil [N = 6,939]). Some patients in controlled trials also received tadalafil in the open-label extension phase of four trials. Across all trials, the dose range of tadalafil was 2-25 mg, with the majority of patients receiving tadalafil 20 mg. This analysis represents an update of previous published results. RESULTS: In 35 controlled tadalafil clinical trials, the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events was low and comparable in tadalafil- and placebo-treated patients. The rate of myocardial infarction (MI) across all controlled and open-label studies was 0.33 per 100 patient-years in tadalafil-treated patients (N = 10,460, patient exposure = 5,088 patient-years). The MI rate in tadalafil-treated patients was comparable to that in placebo-treated patients (0.41 per 100 patient-years; N = 2,118; 489 patient-years), and to that in an age-standardized male population (0.6 per 100 patient-years). The cardiac mortality rate in tadalafil-treated patients across all studies (N = 10,460) was 0.12 per 100 patient-years which was not increased compared with the cardiac mortality rate of 0.26 per 100 patient-years reported in an age-standardized male population. CONCLUSIONS: In tadalafil clinical trials, the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events in patients receiving tadalafil was low and comparable to placebo. Tadalafil did not increase the rate of MI or cardiac mortality compared with reported rates from epidemiological studies. This favorable cardiovascular safety profile for tadalafil is important, because men with ED commonly have cardiovascular disease and may seek medical therapy for ED.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Efficacy and safety of oral tadalafil in the treatment of men in Canada with erectile dysfunction: a randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a highly prevalent, often undertreated condition. AIM: This 12-week, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study was conducted at 25 sites in Canada to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, for the treatment of ED. METHODS: Men with ED of organic, psychogenic, or mixed etiology were stratified by baseline ED severity then randomly assigned to placebo (N = 50), tadalafil 10 mg (N = 103), or tadalafil 20 mg (N = 100), taken as needed (maximum, once daily). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy was assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), a Sexual Encounter Profile diary, and a global assessment question (GAQ). RESULTS: Tadalafil 10 mg and tadalafil 20 mg significantly improved erectile function compared with placebo (P < 0.001, all measures). At end point, the mean IIEF erectile function (EF) domain scores were 14.5, 21.2, and 23.3 of a possible score of 30 for placebo, tadalafil 10 mg, and tadalafil 20 mg, respectively. Patients treated with tadalafil reported greater change from baseline on the IIEF EF domain score compared with placebo, regardless of baseline ED severity. During treatment, the mean per-patient proportion of successful intercourse attempts was higher for tadalafil 10 mg and 20 mg than for placebo (placebo, 31.9%; tadalafil 10 mg, 56.7%; and tadalafil 20 mg, 61.5%), and a greater proportion of patients reported improved erections with tadalafil (GAQ; placebo, 22.0%; tadalafil 10 mg, 67.0%; tadalafil 20 mg, 79.0%). Fifty percent and 62% of patients treated with tadalafil 10 mg and 20 mg, respectively, achieved successful sexual intercourse after their first dose, compared with 31% with placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events were generally mild or moderate. CONCLUSION: Tadalafil was an effective, well-tolerated therapy for ED of broad-spectrum etiology and severity.

3',5'-Cyclic-GMP Phosphodiesterases↗
PubMed2005

An open-label, multicentre, randomized, crossover study comparing sildenafil citrate and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction in men naïve to phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare treatment preference, efficacy, and tolerability of sildenafil citrate (sildenafil) and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction (ED) in men naïve to phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an open-label, crossover study of sildenafil and tadalafil (taken as needed). After a 4-week baseline assessment, 367 men with ED (mean age 54 years) were randomized to receive sildenafil for 12 weeks followed by tadalafil for 12 weeks or vice versa (8-week dose optimization and 4-week assessment phases). During dose optimization, patients started taking 25- or 50-mg sildenafil or 10-mg tadalafil and could titrate to find their optimum dose (25-, 50- or 100-mg sildenafil; 10- or 20-mg tadalafil). After completing both 12-week periods, patients chose which treatment to continue during an 8-week extension. Efficacy was measured with the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary. RESULTS: Of the 291 men who completed both treatments, 85 (29%) chose sildenafil and 206 (71%) chose tadalafil (P < 0.001) for the 8-week extension. The IIEF erectile function domain scores were 14.2 at baseline, 23.9 at endpoint on sildenafil, and 24.3 at endpoint on tadalafil (P = 0.08, sildenafil vs tadalafil). The mean per patient percentage success scores for SEP2 (penetration) were: baseline (46%), sildenafil (post-baseline 82%) and tadalafil (post-baseline 85%; P = 0.06, sildenafil vs tadalafil), and for SEP3 (successful intercourse) were: baseline (19%), sildenafil (post-baseline 72%), and tadalafil (post-baseline 77%; P = 0.003, sildenafil vs tadalafil). The only treatment-emergent adverse events that were reported by >5% of men were headache and flushing. CONCLUSIONS: In men with ED who were naïve to PDE5 inhibitor therapy, sildenafil and tadalafil were both effective and well tolerated. After treatment with sildenafil and tadalafil, 29% of men chose sildenafil and 71% chose tadalafil for ED therapy during an 8-week extension.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Switching patients with erectile dysfunction from sildenafil citrate to tadalafil: results of a European multicenter, open-label study of patient preference.

BACKGROUND: Three inhibitors of phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) are now available for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED): sildenafil citrate, vardenafil, and tadalafil. Pharmacologic differences between these compounds may result in patient preferences for one over another and may influence treatment decisions made by the physician and patient. Therefore, clinical research is needed to investigate whether individual properties of the PDE5 inhibitors play a role in shaping patient preference. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine what proportion of ED patients currently taking sildenafil would, after a period of treatment with tadalafil, elect to resume treatment with sildenafil at the customary dose and what proportion would elect a switch to tadalafil 20 mg for a longer period. The tolerability of both treatments was also investigated. METHODS: This was a short-term, multicenter, open-label, 1-way crossover trial conducted in Sweden and Italy. Eligible patients included men aged >or=18 years with a minimum 3-month history of ED who had been taking sildenafil at stable fixed doses of 25, 50, or 100 mg as needed for at least 6 weeks and up to 24 weeks. The study consisted of 6 phases: a 1-week screening phase, a 3-week sildenafil assessment phase, a 1-week washout phase, a 6-week tadalafil initiation phase, a 3-week tadalafil assessment phase, and a 6-month extension phase, during which patients received their treatment of choice free of charge. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients electing to take sildenafil or tadalafil during the extension phase. RESULTS: Of 155 men enrolled, 147 (97.8%) completed the assessment phases of the trial. Of these 147 men, 133 (90.5%) elected to receive tadalafil in the 6-month extension phase and 14 (9.5%) elected to receive sildenafil (P < 0.001). The proportions preferring tadalafil to sildenafil were similar irrespective of age group (>or=50 years, 92%; <50 years, 90%), severity of ED (mild, 95%; moderate, 88%; severe, 96%), etiology of ED (psychogenic, 94%; organic, 91%; mixed, 87%), and sildenafil dose at study entry (50 mg, 90%; 100 mg, 89%). Both medications were well tolerated. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in >or=2% of patients during the tadalafil assessment phase included headache (4.8%), nasal congestion (4.1%), dyspepsia (3.4%), flushing (2.7%), back pain (2.0%), diarrhea (2.0%), and nausea (2.0%); the most common treatment-emergent adverse events during the sildenafil assessment phase were flusing (7.1%), nasal congestion (6.5%), headache (4.5%), and nasopharyngitis (3.2%). CONCLUSIONS: In this short-term, open-label study, patients who were currently taking sildenafil for ED and then received tadalafil preferred to continue oral therapy with tadalafil over sildenafil by a ratio of approximately 9:1. Although the study sought to mimic the experience of actual patients receiving treatment for ED, the results are subject to potential limitations due to the design of the study, which included differences in dosing instructions and dosages for sildenafil and tadalafil. Both sildenafil and tadalafil were well tolerated.

3',5'-Cyclic-GMP Phosphodiesterases↗
PubMed2006

Psychosocial outcomes and drug attributes affecting treatment choice in men receiving sildenafil citrate and tadalafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: results of a multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover study.

INTRODUCTION: Although sildenafil citrate (sildenafil) and tadalafil are efficacious and well-tolerated treatments for erectile dysfunction (ED), preference studies have shown that patients may favor one medication over the other. AIM: To determine whether psychosocial outcomes differed when men with ED received tadalafil compared with sildenafil. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measures included a treatment preference question, Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales (PAIRS), and Drug Attribute Questionnaire. METHODS: Randomized, open-label, crossover study. After a 4-week baseline, men with ED (N = 367; mean age = 54 years; naïve to type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibitor therapy) were randomized: tadalafil for 12 weeks then sildenafil for 12 weeks or vice versa (8-week dose optimization/4-week assessment phases). During dose optimization, patients started with 10 mg tadalafil, or 25 or 50 mg sildenafil and could titrate to their optimal dose (10 or 20 mg tadalafil; 25, 50, or 100 mg sildenafil). Medications were taken as needed. Patients completing both 12-week periods chose which medication to continue during an 8-week extension. RESULTS: Of 291 men completing both treatment periods, 71% (N = 206) chose tadalafil and 29% (N = 85) chose sildenafil (P < 0.001) for the 8-week extension. When taking tadalafil compared with sildenafil men had higher mean endpoint scores on PAIRS Sexual Self-Confidence (tadalafil = 2.91 vs. sildenafil = 2.75; P < 0.001) and Spontaneity (tadalafil = 3.32 vs. sildenafil = 3.17; P < 0.001) Domains and a lower mean endpoint score on Time Concerns Domain (tadalafil = 2.2 vs. sildenafil = 2.59; P < 0.001). The two most frequently chosen drug attributes to explain treatment preference were ability to get an erection long after taking the medication and firmness of erections. Tadalafil and sildenafil were well tolerated with 12 (3.3%) patients discontinuing for an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: As measured with PAIRS, men with ED had higher sexual self-confidence and spontaneity and less time concerns related to sexual encounters when treated with tadalafil compared with sildenafil. These psychosocial outcomes may help explain why more men (71%) preferred tadalafil for the treatment of ED in this clinical trial.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Long-term safety and tolerability of tadalafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term safety and tolerability of tadalafil for patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicentre, open-label, 24-month extension trial involving 1173 men with ED. The mean age was 57 (range 23-83) years and 74.8% of patients were taking concomitant medications for comorbid conditions, including diabetes mellitus in 30.5% of men and hypertension in 29.5%. These patients had participated in 1 of 5 previous 8-week or 12-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled tadalafil studies. In the present trial, the starting 10mg dose of tadalafil could be increased to 20mg if the patient could not achieve satisfactory intercourse or reduced to 5mg for an adverse event that was persistent, intolerable and judged by the investigator to be related to tadalafil. RESULTS: Four hundred ninety-three (42.0%) men completed 24 months of treatment. In addition, a further 234 (19.9%) completed 18 months of treatment due to a sponsor decision to reduce the study duration. The total tadalafil exposure was 1676.0 patient-years. Tadalafil was safe and well tolerated. Headache (15.8%), dyspepsia (11.8%), nasopharyngitis (11.4%), and back pain (8.2%) were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events. The rate of discontinuations due to adverse events for this 18-24-month study was 6.3% and the rate for any individual event was <1%. Serious adverse events occurred in 8.6% of patients. No consistent pattern of serious adverse events assessed as causally associated with tadalafil administration was observed. None of the four deaths that occurred during the study was assessed as tadalafil related. There were no clinically significant laboratory or electrocardiographic findings or changes in vital signs in mean baseline-to-endpoint analysis attributable to tadalafil. Tadalafil administration was not causally associated with drug-induced hepatotoxicity, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, or renal dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Tadalafil at doses of 5, 10, or 20mg taken as needed up to once daily for 18 to 24 months was safe and well tolerated. These findings support the long-term use of tadalafil in the clinical management of erectile dysfunction.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Efficacy and treatment satisfaction with on-demand tadalafil (Cialis) in men with erectile dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: Tadalafil (Cialis) is an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 5, which mediates relaxation of vascular smooth muscle in the corpus cavernosum thus facilitating erection. The purpose of this multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled study was to evaluate efficacy and treatment satisfaction of on-demand Cialis in men with mild-to-severe erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: Following a 4-week treatment-free run in period, patients stratified into three severity groups by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function (EF) domain score were randomized to receive either placebo or Cialis 20 mg taken on demand over a 12-week period. Efficacy endpoints were change from baseline in IIEF EF domain scores, responses to Sexual Encounter Profile diary (SEP) questions, and responses to the Global Assessment Questions (GAQ). Treatment satisfaction was evaluated using the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire in two of seven participating countries where validated translations were available. RESULTS: Of the 443 men who entered the trial, 409 (mean age, 52 years) formed the intent-to-treat population. Mean baseline demographics and ED severity measures were balanced between treatment groups except for a higher percentage of patients naïve to sildenafil in the tadalafil group compared to placebo (50% versus 36%). The percentage of patients in each IIEF EF severity class (mild, moderate and severe) was 47%, 30% and 23% for placebo patients and 48%, 29% and 23% for tadalafil patients, respectively. Tadalafil was significantly superior to placebo on all primary efficacy measures (IIEF EF domain scores, SEP15, GAQ1; p < 0.001); notably 64% of tadalafil patients achieved a normal IIEF EF domain score at endpoint compared to 16% of placebo patients (p < 0.001). Of the 185 patients completing the EDITS questionnaire (137 receiving Cialis and 48 receiving placebo), tadalafil-treated patients had a median EDITS score of 84 (95%CI 80, 86), which was significantly higher than the median score for placebo-treated patients of 41 (95%CI 32, 59; p < 0.001; Wilcoxon test). The proportion of patients satisfied with treatment (defined as final EDITS score greater than 50) was 87% for the tadalafil-treated group and 46% for the placebo-treated group (p < 0.001; exact test). Adverse events were significantly more common with tadalafil than placebo (p < 0.01) and included primarily headache (7.2% versus 1.9%) and flushing (4.6% versus 0%). One patient discontinued tadalafil treatment due to back pain. CONCLUSION: In men with mild-to-severe ED, tadalafil 20 mg significantly improves erectile function, demonstrates superior treatment satisfaction relative to placebo, and is well tolerated. This is the first study to yield efficacy data on tadalafil in an Eastern European population of men with erectile dysfunction, and the first to measure satisfaction with the EDITS questionnaire in any study population of men with this condition using tadalafil.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Effect of tadalafil on cytochrome P450 3A4-mediated clearance: studies in vitro and in vivo.

OBJECTIVES: Tadalafil was examined in vitro and in vivo for its ability to affect human cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A-mediated metabolism. METHODS: Reversible and mechanism-based inhibition of CYP3A by tadalafil was examined in human liver microsomes. The ability of tadalafil to influence CYP3A activity was also examined in primary cultures of human hepatocytes. The effect of tadalafil on the pharmacokinetics of CYP3A probe substrates was evaluated in human volunteers before and after coadministration with either a single dose or multiple doses of tadalafil (10 or 20 mg). RESULTS: Negligible competitive inhibition of CYP3A was observed in vitro. Mechanism-based inhibition of CYP3A was detected, albeit with a low potency. In human hepatocytes, exposure to 1 micromol/L or greater of tadalafil resulted in increased CYP3A protein expression; however, as with a combined effect of induction and inhibition, a corresponding increase in CYP3A activity did not occur. The clinical pharmacokinetics of midazolam and lovastatin, probe substrates of CYP3A, were unaffected by up to 14 days of tadalafil administration (90% confidence intervals for the ratio of least squares means for the pharmacokinetic parameters of tadalafil were contained within the no-effect boundaries of 0.7 to 1.43). CONCLUSIONS: In vitro results suggested that tadalafil would have little effect on the pharmacokinetics of drugs metabolized by CYP3A. Clinical studies demonstrated that the pharmacokinetics of 2 different CYP3A substrates, midazolam and lovastatin, were virtually unchanged after tadalafil coadministration. Thus therapeutic concentrations of tadalafil do not produce clinically significant changes in the clearance of drugs metabolized by CYP3A.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Efficacy and safety of tadalafil in a Western European population of men with erectile dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial, the safety and efficacy of on-demand tadalafil (an oral phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor approved in many countries for treating erectile dysfunction, ED) in a Western European population of men with mild-to-severe ED. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized according to baseline severity of ED in a ratio of 3 : 1 to receive either tadalafil 20 mg or placebo for 12 weeks. Primary efficacy endpoints were mean changes from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks) in the erectile function (EF) domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and percentages of 'Yes' responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary Question 2 ('Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?') and Question 3 ('Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?'). Secondary endpoints included mean changes from baseline to endpoint in IIEF Intercourse Satisfaction and Overall Satisfaction domains, selected questions of the IIEF, and the percentage of 'Yes' responses to Global Assessment Questions (GAQ) at the last visit. Other analyses included the percentage of patients in each treatment group at endpoint with IIEF EF domain scores in the normal range (>26), the frequency of intercourse attempts and mean per-patient intercourse success rate at various times after dosing. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 53 years and 80% had a history of ED of > or = 1 year. The mean baseline EF domain score was 13.5, with 40.5% of patients in the severe category. Tadalafil improved mean EF domain scores by 11.1, vs 0.4 for placebo (P < 0.001). In addition, 73.9% of sexual intercourse attempts were successful (SEP-Q3) in tadalafil-treated patients, compared with 29.9% in placebo-treated patients during the period after baseline (P < 0.001). Tadalafil significantly improved the mean IIEF intercourse satisfaction (5.1, tadalafil; 1.1, placebo) and overall satisfaction domain scores (3.9, tadalafil; 0.5, placebo), P < 0.001. GAQs used to assess the overall effect of the treatment indicated that tadalafil was superior to placebo (P < 0.001) in improving erections (82.1%, tadalafil; 23.1%, placebo) and sexual activity (78.6% and 17.3%). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events more frequent (>2%) with tadalafil than placebo were headache, dyspepsia, flushing, back pain, pain in limb and myalgia. These adverse events were mostly mild to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil improved erectile function and was well tolerated when taken by men from Western Europe with mild-to-severe ED.

3',5'-Cyclic-GMP Phosphodiesterases↗
PubMed2005

The efficacy of tadalafil in clinical populations.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of tadalafil in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) by demographic and ED characteristics, in patients having various comorbid medical conditions, and in patients receiving drug treatment for other medical conditions. METHODS: This is an analysis of 11 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with 2,102 men with a broad spectrum of ED etiology and various comorbid medical conditions as participants. The variables analyzed in this report included race, age, body mass index (BMI), ED etiology, ED severity, ED duration, smoking, prior sildenafil use, presence of comorbid conditions (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, hyperlipidemia, depression, benign prostatic hyperplasia), and treatment with antihypertensives or antidepressants. Patients were randomly assigned to receive tadalafil 10 mg (N=321), tadalafil 20 mg (N=1,143), or placebo (N=638). The primary efficacy variables included mean changes from baseline in the erectile function (EF) domain score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, and the mean per-patient percentage of "yes" responses to the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary question 3 (SEP3--successful intercourse). The Global Assessment Question 1 (GAQ) was evaluated, as was the percentage of men attaining a normal IIEF EF domain score at end point. RESULTS: Patients taking tadalafil 10 mg or 20 mg demonstrated significant improvement (P<0.005) from baseline to end point on the IIEF EF domain score in all subpopulations analyzed compared with patients receiving placebo. The mean-per-patient percentage of "yes" responses to SEP3 increased significantly in all subpopulations taking tadalafil compared with placebo (P<0.05). Tadalafil-treated patients had a significantly greater positive response rate on the GAQ in all subpopulations analyzed compared with placebo-treated patients (P<0.03) except for the tadalafil 10 mg cardiovascular subpopulation (placebo, 46.8%; tadalafil 10 mg, 71.0%; P=0.127). The percentage of positive responses ranged from 72% to 91% for patients on tadalafil 20 mg and from 52% to 94% for tadalafil 10 mg compared with a range of 20% to 47% for placebo-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil was effective in improving erectile function across a wide spectrum of ED patients including patients with various comorbid conditions.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover study of patient preference for tadalafil 20 mg or sildenafil citrate 50 mg during initiation of treatment for erectile dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Tadalafil is a phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor approved in >30 countries for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). It has been shown to improve erectile function compared with placebo in Phase III studies, but clinical experience comparing tadalafil with the PDE5 inhibitor sildenafil citrate is lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study compared patient preference for tadalafil 20 mg or sildenafil 50 mg during initial treatment for ED. It also compared the tolerability of the 2 agents at these doses. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, fixed-dose, 2-period crossover trial took place at 13 sites in the United States and Germany. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 4 weeks of treatment with tadalafil 20 mg or sildenafil 50 mg, followed by the alternative treatment, to be taken as needed up to once daily before sexual activity. RESULTS: The study enrolled 215 men with ED, 109 randomized to the tadalafil-sildenafil sequence and 106 to the sildenafil-tadalafil sequence. Their mean age was 49.8 years; 84.7% were sildenafil naive and 15.3% had undergone a previous inadequate trial of sildenafil. Most patients had moderate ED (60.5%) of >or=1 year's duration (74.9%). Of 190 evaluable patients, 126 (66.3%) preferred to initiate treatment with tadalafil, compared with 64 (33.7%) with sildenafil (P < 0.001). Patients' preference did not differ by age, duration of ED, treatment sequence, or previous sildenafil exposure. Both medications were well tolerated, with no significant differences in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. Headache (11.2% tadalafil, 8.8% sildenafil), dyspepsia (6.0% and 4.2%, respectively), nasopharyngitis (4.7% and 2.8%), and flushing (2.8% and 4.7%) were the most common adverse events. The rate of ocular disturbances was low: 1 patient experienced intermittent bilateral reduction in visual acuity with tadalafil, and 2 exhibited conjunctival hyperemia or eyelid edema with sildenafil. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil 20 mg was preferred to sildenafil 50 mg for the initiation of ED therapy in this study population. Both medications were well tolerated.

3',5'-Cyclic-GMP Phosphodiesterases↗