SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Tenecteplase”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Occlusion site and outcomes in intra-arterial tenecteplase after successful endovascular therapy: a secondary analysis of the ANGEL-TNK trial.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular thrombectomy achieves macroreperfusion in large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke, but only one-quarter of patients had excellent functional outcome. Adjunct intra-arterial (IA) tenecteplase could further improve the treatment effect, yet its efficacy across internal carotid artery (ICA) versus middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1/M2 occlusion remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether IA tenecteplase improves 90-day functional outcomes in LVO patients stratified by occlusion site (ICA, MCA M1, MCA M2). METHODS: Prespecified secondary analysis of the ANGEL-TNK trial (multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint) in 19 Chinese stroke centers. Participants were enrolled who had anterior circulation LVO, 4.5-24 hours from symptom onset, and CT angiography (CTA)/magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)-proven ICA, M1, or M2 occlusion. INTERVENTION: Randomization (1:1) to IA tenecteplase (0.125 mg/kg) or standard medical management after expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) 2b50-3 reperfusion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome was the rate of 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-1. RESULTS: There were 256 patients in the trial, including 71 (27.7%) ICA, 122 (47.6%) MCA M1, and 62 (24.2%) MCA M2. ICA occlusion patients treated with IA tenecteplase had higher rates of 90-day mRS 0-1 (39.4% vs 13.2%; relative risk (RR) 2.99; 95% CI 1.51 to 5.96; p=0.002) and mRS 0-3 (54.5% vs 42.1%; RR 1.30; p=0.048) versus controls, with a significant shift toward better mRS scores (median 3 (IQR 1-4) vs 4 (2-6); odds ratio (OR) 2.26; p<0.001). Post hoc analysis showed higher eTICI progression in ICA patients (51.5%) versus MCA M1 (37.9%) and M2 (25.7%). IA tenecteplase had a lower any intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours in ICA patients (15.2% vs 39.5%; RR 0.38; p<0.001) compared with standard medical management. No significant benefits were observed in the MCA M1/M2 subgroups, and interaction effects were significant between ICA and MCA segments for functional outcomes and safety. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: IA tenecteplase had a better functional outcome and lower hemorrhage risk in ICA occlusion compared with standard medical management but not in MCA M1/M2. Occlusion site is a critical determinant of response to IA tenecteplase. A pooled analysis of IA tenecteplase stratified by occlusion site strata is warranted.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Trade-Off Between Early Reperfusion and First-Pass Effect With Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase Before Stroke Thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND: Early reperfusion and first-pass effect are key procedural end points in large-vessel occlusion stroke thrombectomy. Because of greater fibrin specificity, tenecteplase may achieve higher early reperfusion rates compared with alteplase, yet impact of thrombolytic agents on first-pass effect remains unclear. METHODS: Consecutive patients with anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion stroke receiving intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular treatment at 2 US stroke centers were reviewed. Early reperfusion was defined as extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction ≥2b50 on initial angiography. First-pass effect was defined as extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2c-3 after a single pass. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of early reperfusion and first-pass effect. Ordinal logistic regression assessed associations of thrombolytic agent, early reperfusion, and first-pass effect with 90-day modified Rankin Scale shift. RESULTS: Among 299 patients (tenecteplase 201, alteplase 98), early reperfusion occurred in 60 (20.1%) and was more frequent with tenecteplase compared with alteplase (24.4% versus 11.2%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.31 [95% CI, 1.07-4.98]). Patients without early reperfusion were evaluated for first-pass effect. Of 237 patients, first-pass effect was less frequent with tenecteplase compared with alteplase (30.3% versus 40.2%; adjusted OR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.23-0.79]). Early reperfusion and first-pass effect each independently predicted better functional outcome, but functional outcomes were similar between tenecteplase and alteplase overall. CONCLUSIONS: We observed higher early reperfusion rates with tenecteplase, but greater first-pass effect with alteplase, while functional outcomes were comparable. This may suggest that the early reperfusion advantage of tenecteplase could be offset by downstream procedural variables such as first-pass effect, highlighting the importance of jointly evaluating both reperfusion and procedural efficiency when comparing thrombolytic strategies.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effect of Baseline ASPECTS on Tenecteplase Efficacy Before Thrombectomy in Acute Large-Vessel Occlusion Stroke: A Post Hoc Analysis of the BRIDGE-TNK Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The impact of ischemic extent on the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis before thrombectomy remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the baseline ischemic extent, measured by the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS), modifies outcomes of intravenous tenecteplase administered before endovascular thrombectomy. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the BRIDGE-TNK (thrombectomy with vs without rhTNK-tPA in stroke) trial, conducted across China from May 2022 to September 2024. We compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous tenecteplase plus thrombectomy vs thrombectomy alone in acute large-vessel occlusion stroke patients within 4.5 hours of last known well, stratified by baseline ASPECTS (<8 vs 8-10). The outcomes included 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2), 48-hour symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality. Regression models incorporating a treatment-by-ASPECTS interaction term were used for analysis. RESULTS: Among 550 patients, 241 (43.8%) had ASPECTS <8 (median [interquartile range, IQR] age, 69 [61-77] years; 56.4% male) and 309 had ASPECTS 8-10 (median [IQR] age, 70 [61-77] years; 59.5% male). The rate of functional independence was significantly higher in the tenecteplase plus thrombectomy group than in the thrombectomy-alone group in the ASPECTS <8 subgroup (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.67; 95% CI 1.18-2.35), but not in the ASPECTS 8-10 subgroup (aRR, 0.99; 95% CI 0.84-1.17; pinteraction = 0.007). Rates of sICH did not differ significantly between treatment groups in either ASPECTS subgroups (ASPECTS <8: 10.0% vs 11.2%; ASPECTS 8-10: 7.5% vs 2.8%; pinteraction = 0.11). Ninety-day mortality was comparable between treatment groups in the ASPECTS <8 subgroup, but numerically higher with tenecteplase plus thrombectomy in the ASPECTS 8-10 subgroup (aRR = 1.89, 95% CI 0.99-3.61, pinteraction = 0.04). DISCUSSION: In this exploratory post hoc analysis, a signal of benefit was observed in patients with ASPECTS <8 who received intravenous tenecteplase before thrombectomy, whereas no functional improvement and possible safety concerns were seen in those with ASPECTS 8-10. Prospective confirmation in randomized trials is required before practice change. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04733742.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Early Reperfusion in Basilar Artery Occlusion Stroke Managed With Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase Before Endovascular Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Timely reperfusion is a critical determinant of favorable outcomes in basilar artery occlusion (BAO) stroke. We aimed to examine whether the choice of thrombolytic agent predicts early reperfusion (ER) in BAO stroke managed with tenecteplase versus alteplase before endovascular treatment. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter US cohort of consecutive patients with BAO from 14 stroke centers treated with tenecteplase or alteplase within 4.5 hours of last known well before endovascular treatment. The primary end point was ER, defined as angiographic ER (expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade 2b to 3 on the first diagnostic angiogram), or clinical ER, defined as substantial neurological improvement precluding endovascular treatment and a good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-3). RESULTS: Among 163 patients with BAO and a median last known well-to-needle time of 135 minutes (interquartile range, 100-193) and last known well-to-puncture time of 228 minutes (interquartile range, 166-307), ER was observed in 27 (16.6%) patients. Rates of ER were comparable between tenecteplase (14/75, 18.7%) and alteplase (13/88, 14.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.082 [95% CI, 0.444-2.631]; P=0.862). In addition, rates of angiographic ER and clinical ER subgroups did not differ between thrombolytic agents. Higher Basilar Artery on Computed Tomography Angiography scores and a nonatherothrombotic cause independently predicted ER. In multivariable analysis, a good functional outcome was associated with younger age, lower stroke burden, and shorter last known well-to-puncture time. CONCLUSIONS: In BAO treated within 4.5 hours of last known well, tenecteplase and alteplase produced comparable early reperfusion rates. Achieving ER did not modify the association between thrombolytic agent and good functional outcome, consistent with rapid thrombectomy in patients with no ER.

basilar artery↗

PubMed2026

Extending the Treatment Window for Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is the standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of onset. However, imaging-based selection may extend the treatment window. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of IVT administered beyond 4.5 hours after stroke onset or last known well (LKW) in patients selected based on imaging findings. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was performed to identify randomized controlled trials comparing IVT with alteplase or tenecteplase (TNK) administered >4.5 hours after stroke onset/LKW vs standard care. Primary outcomes were 3-month excellent (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-1) functional outcome and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Secondary outcomes included good (mRS 0-2) functional outcome, recanalization, and 3-month mortality. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Subgroup analysis assessed differences between alteplase and TNK. RESULTS: Fourteen studies involving 4,944 patients were included. The mean age was 69.8 years, 58.2% were male, the median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 9, and 12.3% received preplanned endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). A total of 2,492 patients received IVT in an extended time window (4.5-24 hours). Compared with standard care, extended IVT was associated with higher odds of achieving an excellent functional outcome (OR: 1.43 [95% CI 1.25-1.63]), a good functional outcome (OR: 1.25 [95% CI 1.11-1.40]), and recanalization (OR: 3.28 [95% CI 2.09-5.16]). There was no difference in 3-month mortality (OR: 1.21 [95% CI 0.95-1.53]). However, IVT increased the risk of sICH (OR: 2.51 [95% CI 1.47-4.28]). Sensitivity analysis excluding patients who received EVT showed no impact on the outcomes. TNK exhibited similar efficacy to alteplase but showed potentially lower odds of sICH (OR: 1.96, 95% CI 1.06-3.64) compared with alteplase (OR: 5.29, 95% CI 1.80-15.57); however, the subgroup difference was not significant (p = 0.11). DISCUSSION: Among patients selected based on imaging, 4.5-24 hours after stroke onset/LKW, IVT improves outcomes despite an increased risk of sICH. TNK showed similar efficacy to alteplase, with a possible lower risk of sICH; however, direct comparisons in future trials are needed.

Humans↗