PubMed HealthSearch

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Terminal Care”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparison of places and policies for terminal care.

Patients receiving different types of adequate care for fatal neoplasms were compared by an assessment of their mood and opinions. 78% had spoken of dying, and, although 56% had some unhappiness and anxiety, many were not distressed. Most aspects of care were approved of with no consistant difference in ratings between acute hospital wards and a Foundation Home. Patients were least depressed and anxious at a hospice and preferred the more frank communication available there. Inpatients were slightly less troubled than outpatients who nevertheless praised this management.

Adult

Terminal care: evaluation of in-patient service at St Christopher's Hospice. Part I. Views of surviving spouse on effects of the service on the patient.

The surviving spouses of 34 patients who died of cancer at St Christopher's Hospice have been interviewed about 13 months after the patient's death. The information given is compared with that obtained from 34 spouses of patients dying from cancer in other hospitals and matched with the St Christopher's group. Patients at St Christopher's were less often thought to have suffered severe pain and other distress than at other hospitals, but pain relief was not bought at the cost of drug-induced confusion and patients at St Christopher's remained more mobile than at other hospitals. Hospice patients were more aware of chapel services and prayers than at other hospitals. None was said to have been upset by these and 66% were glad of them. Despite the frequency of deaths in the Hospice, patients at St Christopher's were no more likely to be thought to have been 'upset' by such events than patients elsewhere or to have found their interactions with other patients anything but helpful.

Attitude to Death

Letter: Terminal care.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Attitude of Health Personnel

Health-system burden of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes in England: a literature-based micro-cost analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the per-patient-per-month (PPPM) cost for each phase of care in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) and the overall cost of a base-case (illustrative) non-curative management pathway followed by a patient with HR-MDS in England. DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective, literature-based, micro-costing analysis from the National Health Service (NHS) England provider perspective using published sources and publicly available price lists. No individual-patient data were used. Based on literature, a base-case management pathway followed by a patient with HR-MDS was defined as a diagnostic work-up at month 0, 12 cycles of azacitidine (given for 7 days in each 28-day cycle), 5 months of post-hypomethylating agent (HMA) failure supportive care and 1 month of terminal care. SETTING: Healthcare resource utilisation was analysed for adults with HR-MDS who received first-line azacitidine in routine practice if cycle-level or phase-level transfusion and admission rates were reported in the literature. Patients who required allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation or whose HR-MDS transformed to acute myeloid leukaemia were excluded because the diagnostic and/or therapeutic pathways differ. Unit costs for 2024/2025 were taken from published English national sources and an English trust tariff. RESULTS: PPPM costs were £8721.58 during active azacitidine therapy, £5399.58 after HMA failure and £12 554.58 for hospital-dominant terminal care; a one-off diagnostic work-up with genomics cost £2710 to £2810. The total cost for the base-case management pathway was £146 921 per patient. An alternative pathway excluding genomic testing and assuming hospice-dominant terminal care reduced the total cost to approximately £136 840 to £140 990, depending on whether the lower or upper bound of hospice bed-day costs is applied. CONCLUSIONS: The direct NHS-provider cost burden of this non-curative HR-MDS management pathway is concentrated in azacitidine acquisition and administration during active treatment, transfusions and admissions after HMA failure and setting-dependent costs at the end of life. The total cost for the illustrative management pathway followed by a patient with HR-MDS (£146 921) is of a similar order to the estimate in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence technology appraisal for azacitidine uprated to £124 848 for 2024/2025. This comparison is provided for context only and should not be interpreted as validation of the present model, given differences in population, model structure, treatment duration and price year. The phase-specific PPPM estimates can inform, subject to local validation and scenario testing, UK budget-impact analyses, service planning and future economic models.

Humans