PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Thermometry”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1994

The superiority of rectal thermometry to oral thermometry with regard to accuracy.

Electronic oral thermometry is performed routinely in most medical centres. From the studies available on this subject it seems difficult to find any documentation for this practice. We have conducted clinically controlled studies in which the accuracy of electronic oral thermometry (CRAFTEMP and TERUMO WCT) and that of electronic rectal thermometry (TERUMO WCT) were tested. Rectal glass mercury thermometry was used as a reference method. Two studies were designed. In study 1, 184 patients (72 women, 112 men), median age 70 (18-95) years were investigated. In study 2, 91 patients (41 women, 50 men), median age 59 (18-96) years were investigated. Electronic oral thermometry was found unacceptably inaccurate under daily routine conditions. Electronic rectal thermometry was found to be accurate. Calculations of mean temperature difference between reference measurements and test measurements (mean +/- SD) were found to be: routine oral CRAFTEMP at 0.70 +/- 0.50 degrees C, optimum oral TERUMO WCT at 0.75 +/- 0.74 degrees C, routine rectal TERUMO WCT at 0.08 +/- 0.26 degrees C and optimum rectal TERUMO WCT at 0.02 +/- 0.17. In the screening procedure for fever oral thermometry showed low sensitivity (routine CTAFTEMP 0.47 and optimum TERUMO WCT 0.59) whereas rectal thermometry showed high sensitivity (routine TERUMO WCT 0.74 and optimum TERUMO WCT 0.91). It was concluded that rectal thermometry must be preferred to oral thermometry for daily routine measurements.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Electrogram-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial tissue comparison with thermometry-guide ablation: comparison with thermometry-guide ablation.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize a new method for radiofrequency energy titration during ablation of atrial tissue based on reduction in electrogram amplitude. To compare this method with energy titration using electrode thermometry. BACKGROUND: Complications associated with "anatomy-based" atrial endocardial radiofrequency ablation for suppression of atrial fibrillation may be due to flawed methods of energy titration. METHODS: The effect of radiofrequency ablation on electrogram amplitude was characterized in a porcine model. A method for energy titration guided by electrogram amplitude reduction ("electrogram-guided") was developed and validated prospectively. Focal (smooth and trabeculated endocardial areas) and linear (smooth endocardial areas) ablation was performed comparing energy titration guided by amplitude reduction with electrode thermometry. RESULTS: Amplitude reduction during radiofrequency application was not necessarily equal among unipolar and bipolar electrograms in the ablation region; specific patterns of reduction could be discerned, based on factors such as catheter-endocardial orientation. A criterion of >90 % reduction of unipolar and/or bipolar amplitude best predicted pathologic lesion success. Electrogram-guided focal and linear lesions in smooth areas were free of lesion complications such as endocardial charring, barotrauma, or damage to contiguous extraatrial structures. However, there was a significant incidence of insufficient lesion size, principally non-transmurality, probably due to undertitration of energy. Thermometry-guided focal and linear lesions in smooth areas were uniformly transmural but frequently evidenced complications, due to overtitration of energy. Electrogram-guided focal lesions in trabeculated areas could usually not be achieved, probably due to insufficient contact of the ablation electrode with adjacent pectinate muscles. Thermometry-guided focal lesions in trabeculated areas were smaller than electrogram-guided lesions and did not evidence complications. CONCLUSIONS: Electrogram-guided lesions in smooth endocardial areas were uncomplicated but had a significant incidence of non-transmurality. Thermometry-guided lesions were uniformly transmural but were frequently complicated.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Invasive thermometry and prognostic thermometry in radiological hyperthermia].

The term radiological hyperthermia is used to describe the exposure of biological tissues to temperatures just above physiological ones, namely between 42 and 45 degrees C. A machine for hyperthermia (SAPIC SV03 produced by Aeritalia, Caselle, Turin) is been experimentally used at the authors' institute. The present study aims to analyse the technical and qualitative aspects of temperature control using invasive and previsional thermometry. The term invasive thermometry is used to describe the insertion of small teflon catheters into the biological body through which thermometric probes are introduced to control deep temperature. Previsional thermometry is the phrase used to describe the computer simulation of hyperthermic treatment, starting from knowledge of the tissue to be heated and the type of applicator used. The simulated treatment and the real temperature measured are then compared in order to optimize the treatment used.

Equipment Design↗
PubMed2002

Infrared ear thermometry compared with rectal thermometry in children: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Infrared ear thermometry is frequently used in children, because this is a quick method of taking temperature and the ear is easily accessible. Our aim was to evaluate agreement between temperature measured at the rectum and ear in children. METHODS: We did a systematic review of studies comparing temperature measured at the rectum (the reference site) using mercury, electronic, or indwelling probe thermometers, with temperature measured at the ear (the test site) using infrared ear thermometers. Heterogeneity between studies was investigated by exploring subgroups according to the mode of the infrared ear thermometer. FINDINGS: 44 studies containing 58 comparisons (5935 children) were eligible for inclusion in this review. Outcome data were available in reports from 12 comparisons (2312 [39%] children), and data on individual patients were obtained for a further 19 comparisons (2129 [36%] children). 31 comparisons (4441 [75%] children) were therefore included in the meta-analysis. The pooled mean temperature difference (rectal minus ear) was 0.29 degrees C (95% limits of agreement -0.74 to 1.32). We pooled data by ear device mode and the mean temperature differences were rectal mode 0.15 degrees C (-0.95 to 1.25), actual 0.70 degrees C (-0.20 to 1.60), core 0.25 degrees C (-0.78 to 1.27), oral 0.34 degrees C (-0.86 to 1.54), tympanic 0.62 degrees C (-0.40 to 1.64) and mode not stated 0.32 degrees C (-0.57 to 1.21). There was significant residual heterogeneity in both mean differences and sample SDs within the groups of ear device mode. INTERPRETATION: Although the mean differences between rectal and ear temperature measurements were small, the wide limits of agreement mean that ear temperature is not a good approximation of rectal temperature, even when the ear thermometer is used in rectal mode. Our finding suggests that infrared ear thermometry does not show sufficient agreement with an established method of temperature measurement to be used in situations where body temperature needs to be measured with precision.

Body Temperature↗
PubMed1998

Are electronic thermometry techniques suitable alternatives to traditional mercury in glass thermometry techniques in the paediatric setting?

Three thermometers, mercury in glass, Becton-Dickinson digital and IVAC tympanic membrane thermometer, were compared. The study was designed to test the null hypothesis that there is no difference between the thermometer recordings, meaning that electronic thermometry is a suitable alternative to traditional mercury in glass thermometry. Children aged between 0 and 15 years old were entered into the study, n = 114. Standard procedures were used throughout the study to minimize the risk of errors in the data collection and technical errors were recorded. The data were analysed using graphical techniques described by Bland and Altman. The differences between the temperature recordings were plotted against their mean (the estimated true value), with the bias and limits of agreement (2 standard deviations from the mean) calculated for the mercury in glass/digital, mercury in glass/tympanic and digital/tympanic temperature recordings. The range of temperatures were 35.1 degrees C-38.5 degrees C, with a mean of 36.85 degrees C for the mercury in glass thermometer, 36.8 degrees C for the digital thermometer and 36.65 degrees C for the tympanic thermometer. The bias for each comparison was 0.36 degrees C, 0.21 degrees C and 0.17 degrees C and the limits of agreement were wide, -0.516 degrees C to 1.234 degrees C, -0.84 degrees C to 1.252 degrees C and -0.940C to 1.244 degrees C for the mercury in glass/digital, mercury in glass/tympanic and digital/ tympanic recordings respectively. A difference of 0.2 degrees C is usually accepted for clinical practice, therefore the null hypothesis was rejected.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

[Radiation thermometry and contact thermometry in patients with pyelonephritis].

UNLABELLED: A study is presented of 79 patients with acute and chronic pyelonephritis examined by means of dynamic calorimetry and contact thermometry. Thermal asymmetry of the lumbar region were revealed in 22 patients by means of contact thermometry. Dynamic calorimetry revealed changes of the transitional process in 75 patients as compared with the control. CONCLUSION: the method has a diagnostic value.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

The equivalency of infrared tympanic membrane thermometry with standard thermometry in nursing home residents.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the equivalence of infrared tympanic membrane (TM) measure of body temperature with standard electronic oral (PO) and rectal (R) measures in a nursing home population. DESIGN: Randomized repeated-measurement design. METHODS: For the study, 82 randomly selected residents (mean age 79 +/- 10 years) of the Nursing Home Care Unit of the VAMC West Los Angeles had PO, R, and TM temperatures measured before arising (6-8 am). An otoscopic exam and the age, sex, presence of neurologic disease, and compliance with thermometry was noted. Also, repeated measures of PO and TM temperatures were performed three times to assess variability. The Pearson's correlation coefficient was determined for PO versus R and for TM versus R temperatures. Stepwise regression analysis was performed with the dependent variable of R temperature and the independent variables of the mean TM temperature, age, sex, presence of neurologic disease, position of the resident, and extent of ear canal occlusion. RESULTS: The correlation of TM versus R (r = .39, P = .004) was better, though not significantly, than of PO versus R (r = .28, P = .04). TM had less variability than PO (pooled standard deviation .38 vs .45 degrees F, respectively) and TM was implemented successfully more often than PO or R (96% vs 81% vs 81%). CONCLUSION: Therefore, TM was at least equivalent or better than PO measures of temperature in this population. The efficacy of fever detection and the use and durability of long-term use by nursing staff needs to be studied.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A comparison of infrared ear thermometry with electronic predictive thermometry in a geriatric setting.

This project had three purposes: to determine the test/retest reliability of three thermometers--an infrared ear thermometer, an oral electronic predictive thermometer, and an oral mercury-in-glass thermometer (MIGT); determine the validity (accuracy) of the first two thermometers using the MIGT as the gold standard; and calculate the thermometers' sensitivity and specificity for detecting fever using 37.5 degrees C on the MIGT as the criterion. The MIGT had the best reliability, followed by the electronic predictive and infrared ear thermometer (for validity, the former was more accurate than the latter). Little difference existed in the latter two thermometers' sensitivity and specificity. However, the confidence intervals were wide, and further studies with larger samples need to be done to elucidate the thermometers' diagnostic properties.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Rationale for using invasive thermometry for regional hyperthermia of pelvic tumors.

PURPOSE: Invasive thermometry for regional hyperthermia is time-consuming, uncomfortable, and risky for the patient. We tried to estimate the benefit/cost ratio of invasive thermometry in regional hyperthermia using the radiofrequency system BSD-2000. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We evaluated 182 patients with locally advanced pelvic tumors that underwent regional hyperthermia. In every patient a tumor-related temperature measurement point was obtained either by invasive or minimally invasive catheter measurement tracks. In the earlier period for every patient an intratumoral measurement point was decided as obligatory and intratumoral catheters were implanted intraoperatively, CT guided, or under fluoroscopy. In the later period, invasive thermometry often was avoided, if a measurement point in or near the tumor was reached by an endoluminally inserted catheter (rectal, vaginal, cervical, urethral, or vesical). For every patient side effects and complications referred to thermometry were evaluated and compared with the potential benefit of the invasively achieved temperature data. The suitability of endolumimally registered temperatures is analyzed to estimate local feasibility (specific absorption rate achieved) and local effectiveness (thermal parameters correlated with response). RESULTS: In 74 of 182 patients invasive thermometry was performed, at most CT-guided for soft tissue sarcomas and rectal recurrences. In 14 of 74 (19%) side effects such as local inflammation, pain, or abscess formation occurred that enforced removal of the catheter. However, local problems were strongly correlated with the dwell time of the catheter and nearly never occurred for dwell times less than 5 days. Fortunately, no fatal complications (e.g., bleeding or perforation) occurred during or after implantation which could be attributed to the invasive thermometry procedure. Endoluminal tumor-related temperature rises per time unit (to estimate power density) were correlated with intratumoral rises at the same patients (where both measurements were available). For a subgroup of patients pooled in two Phase II studies with rectal (n = 37) and cervical (n = 18) carcinomas thermal parameters derived from endoluminal measurements were correlated with response or local control, resp. CONCLUSIONS: If a tumor-related endoluminal temperature measurement point is available, additional invasive thermometry gives no further information to improve the power deposition pattern. For primary rectal and cervical cancer, and probably as well for prostate, bladder and anal cancer, endoluminal measurements are suitable to estimate local feasibility and effectiveness. Therefore, invasive thermometry is dispensable in the majority of patients. In some selected cases, temperature measurement in the tumor center is required to estimate the maximum temperature. In those cases, dwell time of catheters should be minimized--and it should be considered to perform invasive thermometry at the beginning (one or two heat treatments).

Catheterization↗
PubMed1998

Practical limitations of interstitial thermometry during deep hyperthermia.

PURPOSE: Intratumor thermometry during hyperthermia treatment is considered important for several reasons. The morbidity that we experienced from interstitially placed catheters in deep-seated tumors gave reason to weigh the advantages and disadvantages against each other. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The available thermometry in 215 patients treated with hyperthermia for deep-seated tumors was analyzed with the aim to evaluate practically feasible intratumor measurements. The influence of intratumor measurements on the treatment procedure was assessed. RESULTS: Total 120 catheters were placed interstitially in 78 patients. Over the years, the percentage of patients with interstitial thermometry decreased considerably. Forty-nine catheters could remain in place during the whole hyperthermia treatment series. The remaining catheters had to be removed for more or less severe complications, including one fatal event. In fact, the interstitial catheters caused the most severe treatment-related morbidity. During 188 of the total 859 treatments, at least one interstitial catheter was available for thermometry. Per treatment with catheter(s) in situ, the average number of intratumor measurement sites was 6.9. The value of interstitial thermometry for power steering during treatment, to both optimize intratumor temperature distribution and prevent toxicity, appeared limited. The mean volume of the tumors with interstitial thermometry was 314 cm3, SD 325. In relation to the large tumor volumes, the thermal dose parameters calculated from the available data is considered to be of limited value. CONCLUSION: In view of the possible severe complications and the limited clinical value of the information achieved by interstitially placed thermometry catheters, interstitial thermometry was not found to routinely benefit the individual patient.

Catheters, Indwelling↗
PubMed1998

Use of infrared thermometry and effect of otitis externa on external ear canal temperature in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare infrared thermometry with rectal thermometry as a method of assessing core body temperature in dogs and to assess the effect of otitis externa on external ear canal temperature (EECT). DESIGN: Prospective study. ANIMALS: 650 dogs without history or clinical signs of otitis externa and 85 dogs with recurrent or chronic otitis externa. PROCEDURE: Rectal temperature was measured, using a mercury thermometer. External ear canal temperature was measured, using an infrared tympanic thermometer. RESULTS: Measurements of body temperature at the 2 sites did not agree. Sensitivity and specificity of infrared thermometry in detecting fever, as determined by rectal thermometry, were 69.7 and 84.6%, respectively. Use of methods to predict rectal temperature from EECT did not improve the accuracy of infrared thermometry. Otitis externa significantly influenced EECT. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Use of infrared thermometry as a replacement for rectal thermometry in assessing core body temperature in dogs was unsatisfactory. The 2 methods for measuring body temperature were not interchangeable in dogs.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Accuracy of infrared ear thermometry in adult patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess (1) the agreement between infrared ear thermometry and core reference temperature (in the pulmonary artery). (2) the agreement between measurements in the right and left ears, and (3) the screening validity of infrared tympanic thermometry in detecting rectal fever. DESIGN: Temperatures were measured in both ears with an infrared thermometer, in one group of patients by simultaneous measurements with thermistors inserted in the pulmonary artery, esophagus, and rectum, and in the other group with a rectal glass-mercury thermometer. SETTING: An intensive care unit and a department of internal medicine in a secondary care hospital. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Two samples: 16 adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit and 103 consecutive patients admitted to the department of medicine. MEASUREMENTS: The major outcome measures were (a) the agreement between infrared ear thermometry and thermistor pulmonary artery temperature and (b) the sensitivity and specificity for detecting fever, using rectal measurement as reference. RESULTS: Both rectal and esophageal thermistor measurements showed better agreement with the pulmonary artery reference temperature than single ear tympanic thermometry. The sensitivity and specificity of ear thermometry for detecting fever (> or = 38.0 degrees C rectal reference) were 0.58 and 0.94, respectively. Double ear thermometry had a sensitivity of 0.61 and a specificity of 0.95, when using the mean value. CONCLUSIONS: Both rectal and esophageal thermistor measurements showed better agreement with pulmonary artery temperature than single ear themometry. Using the mean of two ear measurements improves the agreement and screening validity for detecting fever by rectal temperature. If temperature measurements are critical, esophageal measurements achieve excellent agreement with pulmonary artery temperatures.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

[Infrared tympanic thermometry compared to mercury thermometers].

Because of conflicting reports we examined the accuracy of infrared tympanic thermometry compared with mercury rectal thermometer and a digital rectal thermometer in a medical ward. We studied prospectively the accuracy of parallel measurements with infrared tympanic thermometer and the correlation between this method and the rectal mercury thermometer. Measurements with digital rectal thermometry are also compared with mercury thermometry. 191 adult inpatients were included. The median difference between infrared tympanic and rectal mercury thermometry in the whole material was -0.5 degree C, but increased to -1.4 degrees C in a selected group with rectal temperature 38 degrees C or more. The median difference between parallel measurements with infrared tympanic thermometer was 0.4 degree C. Digital rectal thermometry, however, was in strict accordance with the rectal mercury method. We found an unacceptable difference in body temperature between measurements with infrared tympanic thermometer and rectal mercury thermometer. In a clinical setting the infrared ear thermometer has a very low sensitivity for detecting fever. Digital rectal thermometry seems to be a good alternative to the rectal mercury thermometer.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Non-invasive magnetic resonance thermometry using thulium-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetate (TmDOTA(-)).

Non-invasive thermometry is pivotal to the future advances of regional hyperthermia as a cancer treatment modality. Current magnetic resonance (MR) thermometry methods suffer from poor thermal resolution due to relatively weak dependence of chemical shift of the (1)H water signal on temperature. This study evaluated the feasibility of using thulium-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetate (TmDOTA(-)) for MR thermometry. TmDOTA(-) is non-toxic and the gadolinium complex of DOTA(4-) is widely used as a MR contrast agent. The results demonstrate that the temperature dependence of the TmDOTA(-) proton shifts are about two orders of magnitudes higher than the water proton and, thus, provide excellent accuracy and resolution. In addition, TmDOTA(-) proton shifts are insensitive to the paramagnetic complex concentration, pH, Ca(2+) or presence of plasma macromolecules and ions. Because hyperthermia is known to produce changes in tissue pH and other physiological parameters, these properties of TmDOTA(-) greatly simplify the procedures for using the lanthanide complex for MR thermometry. Application of TmDOTA(-) for measurement of temperature in a subcutaneously implanted human melanoma xenograft is demonstrated. Finally, the feasibility of imaging one of the (1)H resonances of the lanthanide complex is demonstrated in phantom experiments. Overall, TmDOTA(-) appears to be a promising probe for MR thermometry in vivo.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Cost effectiveness of tympanic thermometry in the pediatric office setting.

This study was designed to see if tympanic thermometry might be more cost effective than cheaper more traditional methods of thermometry when office staff time saved is taken into account. There were 224 patients enrolled from three private pediatric practices. Patients were alternately assigned to have their temperature taken with either a tympanic thermometer or with a rectal or oral thermometer depending on the patient's age. For each child enrolled in the study a nurse was asked to time the temperature taking process. Items included in the cost analysis: a) thermometer costs; b) disposable supply costs; c) personnel costs; d) equipment service costs. The mean duration of temperature taking was 35.2 seconds using tympanic thermometers, 73.4 seconds using electronic predictive thermometers, and 247.2 seconds using glass thermometers. In practices taking an average of 10 temperatures per day, tympanic thermometry saved $2,316/year when compared to glass thermometers and $442/year when compared to electronic predictive thermometers. The data presented in this study show that when nursing time is taken into account, tympanic thermometry is less expensive to perform than traditional methods of thermometry despite the initial higher cost of the thermometer.

Body Temperature↗