PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Tirofiban”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Effects of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade with tirofiban on adverse cardiac events in patients with unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction undergoing coronary angioplasty. The RESTORE Investigators. Randomized Efficacy Study of Tirofiban for Outcomes and REstenosis.

BACKGROUND: Adverse cardiovascular events associated with thrombotic occlusion occur in 4% to 12.8% of patients after coronary angioplasty. Recently, potent antiplatelet agents have been used to reduce those thrombotic complications. Tirofiban is a highly selective, short-acting inhibitor of fibrinogen binding to platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa that inhibits ex vivo platelet aggregation in response to a variety of agonists. METHODS AND RESULTS: The RESTORE trial (Randomized Efficacy Study of Tirofiban for Outcomes and REstenosis) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of tirofiban in patients undergoing coronary interventions (balloon angioplasty or directional atherectomy) within 72 hours of presentation with an acute coronary syndrome (unstable angina pcctoris or acute myocardial infarction). The end points of the study were death from any cause, myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery due to angioplasty failure or recurrent ischemia, repeat target-vessel angioplasty for recurrent ischemia, and insertion of a stent due to actual or threatened abrupt closure of the dilated artery, and the primary end point was a composite representing the occurrence of any of these events. The prespecified primary hypothesis of the study was that tirofiban, administered as a bolus of 10 microg/kg over a 3-minute period and followed by a 36-hour infusion of 0.15 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1), would result in a reduction in the 30-day composite end point compared with placebo. Patients (n=2139) who were already receiving treatment with aspirin and heparin were randomized to receive tirofiban or placebo. The primary composite end point at 30 days was reduced from 12.2% in the placebo group to 10.3% in the tirofiban group, a 16% relative reduction (P=.160). However, 2 days after angioplasty, the tirofiban group had a 38% relative reduction in the composite end point (P< or =.005), and at 7 days there was a 27% relative reduction (P=.022), largely because of a reduction in nonfatal myocardial infarction and the need for repeat angioplasty. When repeat angioplasty or coronary artery bypass surgery procedures were included in the composite only if performed on an urgent or emergency basis, the composite 30-day event rates were 10.5% for the placebo group and 8.0% for the tirofiban group, a relative reduction of 24% (P=.052). Major bleeding, including transfusion, was not significantly different between the two groups (3.7% in the placebo group and 5.3% in the tirofiban group; P=.096). When the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) criteria for major bleeding were used, the incidence was 2.1% in the placebo group compared with 2.4% in the tirofiban group (P=.662). Thrombocytopenia was similar in the placebo and tirofiban groups (0.9% for the placebo group versus 1.1% for the tirofiban group; P=.709). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing coronary angioplasty for acute coronary syndromes, tirofiban protects against early adverse cardiac events related to thrombotic closure. At 30 days, however, the reduction in adverse cardiac events was no longer statistically significant. The bleeding observed with tirofiban was not statistically different from that observed with placebo.

Angina, Unstable↗

Randomized comparison of upstream tirofiban versus downstream high bolus dose tirofiban or abciximab on tissue-level perfusion and troponin release in high-risk acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary interventions: the EVEREST trial.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the effects of upstream tirofiban versus downstream high-dose bolus (HDB) tirofiban and abciximab on tissue level perfusion and troponin I release in high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Optimal timing and dosage of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for ACS remain to be explored. METHODS: We randomized 93 high-risk ACS patients undergoing PCI to receive upstream (in the coronary care unit) tirofiban, downstream (just prior to PCI) HDB tirofiban, and downstream abciximab. We evaluated the effects of the three drug regimens on tissue-level perfusion using the corrected Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) frame count, the TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG), and intracoronary myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) before and immediately after PCI and after cardiac troponin I (cTnI). RESULTS: The TMPG 0/1 perfusion was significantly less frequent with upstream tirofiban compared with HDB tirofiban and abciximab both before (28.1% vs. 66.7% vs. 71%, respectively; p = 0.0009) and after PCI (6.2% vs. 20% vs. 35.5%, respectively; p = 0.015). Upstream tirofiban was also associated with a significantly higher MCE score index (0.88 +/- 0.18 vs. 0.77 +/- 0.32 vs. 0.71 +/- 0.30, respectively; p < 0.05). Post-procedural cTnI elevation was significantly less frequent among patients in the upstream tirofiban group compared with the HDB tirofiban and abciximab groups (9.4% vs. 30% vs. 38.7%, respectively; p = 0.018). The cTnI levels after PCI were significantly lower with upstream tirofiban compared with HDB tirofiban (3.8 +/- 4.1 vs. 7.2 +/- 12; p = 0.015) and abciximab (3.8 +/- 4.1 vs. 9 +/- 13.8; p = 0.0002) CONCLUSIONS: Among high-risk non-ST-segment-elevation ACS patients treated with an early invasive strategy, upstream tirofiban is associated with improved tissue-level perfusion and attenuated myocardial damage.

Abciximab↗

Six-month angiographic and clinical follow-up of patients prospectively randomized to receive either tirofiban or placebo during angioplasty in the RESTORE trial. Randomized Efficacy Study of Tirofiban for Outcomes and Restenosis.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the effects of tirofiban versus placebo on the incidence of adverse cardiac outcomes and coronary artery restenosis at 6 months. BACKGROUND: Tirofiban is a highly selective, short-acting inhibitor of fibrinogen binding to platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa. In a recent clinical study, tirofiban reduced the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events at both 2 and 7 days after coronary angioplasty or directional coronary atherectomy. This reduction persisted but was no longer statistically significant at 30 days. METHODS: The Randomized Efficacy Study of Tirofiban for Outcomes and Restenosis (RESTORE) trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of tirofiban in patients undergoing balloon angioplasty or directional atherectomy within 72 h of presentation with either unstable angina pectoris or acute myocardial infarction. All patients received an initial bolus (10 microg/kg body weight over 3 min), followed by a 36-h infusion (0.15 microg/kg per min) of either tirofiban or placebo. RESULTS: At 6 months the composite end point (either death from any cause, new myocardial infarction, bypass surgery for angioplasty failure or recurrent ischemia, repeat target vessel angioplasty or stent insertion for actual or threatened abrupt closure) occurred in 1,070 placebo group patients (27.1%) and 1,071 tirofiban group patients (24.1%, p = 0.11). Analysis of 6-month coronary arteriograms by means of quantitative coronary arteriography showed no significant difference between placebo- and tirofiban-treated patients in either the incidence of a > or =50% diameter stenosis (57% vs. 51%, p = NS), a loss of > or =50% of lumen diameter gained (50% vs. 50%, p = NS) or a loss of > or =0.72 mm of lumen diameter (44% vs. 42%, p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: The 3% absolute reduction in the incidence of the composite end point at 6 months (27.1% placebo vs. 24.1% tirofiban) was similar to that previously reported at 2 days (8.7% vs. 5.4%, p < 0.005), and there does not appear to be any late effect of tirofiban on clinical end points between day 2 and 6 months. Tirofiban did not reduce the incidence of restenosis at 6 months when defined in a number of ways.

Adult↗

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the platelet GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: implications for adjustment of tirofiban and clopidogrel dosage.

INTRODUCTION: Despite extensive data supporting the use of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) inhibitors in the therapy of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), there is considerable debate as to the optimal choice of antiplatelet regimen. The objective of this study was to conduct a detailed time-resolved analysis of the effects of the GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban with concomitant clopidogrel in ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to improve the dosing regimen of these two commonly used antiplatelet drugs. METHODS: The study was performed in 14 patients with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) ACS who underwent PCI while being treated with the current typically utilized regimen of tirofiban (10 microg/kg bolus, 0.15 microg/kg/min infusion) and clopidogrel (300 mg). Platelet function was assessed before, during, and after tirofiban infusion using a panel of agonists for ADP receptors, PAR1 and PAR4 thrombin receptors, and collagen receptors. RESULTS: Measurements of circulating tirofiban levels demonstrated a trough, which paralleled a reduction in platelet inhibition for all platelet agonists during the time when PCI was being performed. Interestingly, younger ACS patients (<55 years) exhibited less inhibition of platelet function both during the PCI procedure and after termination of the tirofiban infusion. These apparent age differences were primarily attributed to a decreased responsiveness of the younger patients to clopidogrel. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the currently utilized tirofiban dosage is suboptimal and suggests that patients may benefit from a higher dose regimen.

Age Factors↗

Randomized double-blind safety study of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes treated with tirofiban and aspirin: the ACUTE II study. The Antithrombotic Combination Using Tirofiban and Enoxaparin.

BACKGROUND: In comparison with treatment with unfractionated heparin (UFH) and aspirin (ASA), both tirofiban administered with UFH and ASA, and enoxaparin plus ASA have shown superiority in reducing cardiac ischemic events in patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Replacing UFH with enoxaparin when tirofiban is administered to patients may offer further therapeutic benefit, but could also increase bleeding. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to provide estimates of the frequency of bleeding complications, as defined by means of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction(TIMI) group, and collect data on clinical efficacy of the combination of tirofiban with enoxaparin plus ASA. METHODS: Five hundred twenty-five patients with UA/NSTEMI were treated with tirofiban coadministered with ASA and randomized to receive either UFH (n = 210) or enoxaparin (n = 315). Therapy was administered for 24 to 96 hours. Bleeding incidences were assessed until 24 hours after trial therapy was discontinued; other clinical outcomes were assessed for as long as 30 days. RESULTS: The total bleeding rate (TIMI major + minor + loss-no-site) for the UFH group versus the enoxaparin group was 4.8% vs 3.5% (odds ratio [OR] 1.4, CI 0.6-3.4). The TIMI major and minor bleeding rates for the UFH versus the enoxaparin groups were 1.0% versus 0.3% (OR 3.0, CI 0.3-33.8) and 4.3% versus 2.5% (OR 1.7, CI 0.7-4.6). There was an increase in nuisance cutaneous and oral bleeds (<50 mL of blood loss) in the enoxaparin group. Death or myocardial infarction occurred with similar frequency in the 2 groups (9.0% vs 9.2%). However, refractory ischemia requiring urgent revascularization and rehospitalization because of unstable angina occurred more frequently in the UFH group (4.3% vs 0.6% and 7.1% vs 1.6%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with tirofiban plus enoxaparin appears safe, relative to therapy with tirofiban plus UFH.

Adult↗

Mortality at 1 year for the direct comparison of tirofiban and abciximab during percutaneous coronary revascularization: do tirofiban and ReoPro give similar efficacy outcomes at trial 1-year follow-up.

AIMS: Compared with placebo, abciximab has been associated with mortality reduction at late follow-up. The TARGET trial was performed to test whether tirofiban and abciximab provide similar efficacy outcomes among patients undergoing non-emergent, stent-based percutaneous coronary intervention. We report here the 1-year mortality of the study population. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 18 countries at 149 hospitals, 4,809 patients undergoing elective or urgent stent implantation were randomly assigned a bolus and infusion of tirofiban or abciximab. Ischaemic events were assessed at 30 days and 6 months and mortality was assessed at 1 year. We previously reported that abciximab was superior to tirofiban considering the composite rate of death or myocardial infarction at 30 days among all patients and at 6 months among those with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). At 1-year follow-up death occurred in 46 (1.9%) patients who received tirofiban and 42 (1.7%) patients who received abciximab (hazard ratio 1.10, 95% CI 0.72-1.67; P=0.660). Mortality rates for patients with ACS were 2.3% with tirofiban vs. 2.2% with abciximab (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% CI 0.64-1.67; P=0.897) and those without ACS were 1.4 vs. 1.0% (hazard ratio 1.32, 95% CI 0.56-3.13; P=0.530). CONCLUSION: At 1 year, tirofiban provided a similar level of survival benefit compared with abciximab.

Abciximab↗

Adjunctive platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition with tirofiban before primary angioplasty improves angiographic outcomes: results of the TIrofiban Given in the Emergency Room before Primary Angioplasty (TIGER-PA) pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous work has suggested that platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade may confer benefit in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. The TIGER-PA pilot trial was a single-center randomized study to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and utility of early tirofiban administration before planned primary angioplasty in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 100 patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction were randomized to either early administration of tirofiban in the emergency room or later administration in the catheterization laboratory. The primary outcome measures were initial TIMI grade flow, corrected TIMI frame counts, and TIMI grade myocardial perfusion ("blush"). Thirty-day major adverse cardiac events were also assessed. Angiographic outcomes demonstrate a significant improvement in initial TIMI grade flow, corrected TIMI frame counts, and TIMI grade myocardial perfusion when patients are given tirofiban in the emergency room before primary angioplasty. The rate of 30-day major adverse cardiac events suggests that early administration may be beneficial. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that early administration of tirofiban improves angiographic outcomes and is safe and feasible in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

Effects of tirofiban plus clopidogrel versus clopidogrel plus provisional abciximab on biomarkers of myocardial necrosis in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes treated with early aggressive approach. Results of the CLOpidogrel, upstream TIrofiban, in cath Lab Downstream Abciximab (CLOTILDA) study.

BACKGROUND: In non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS), a strong correlation between adverse clinical events and peak values of myocardial necrosis markers has been found. In this study, we evaluated whether the adjunctive treatment with upstream tirofiban reduces the peak levels of cardiac troponin I and creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) fraction in patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing early invasive strategy and pretreated with aspirin, heparin, and clopidogrel. METHODS: A total of 300 patients were randomized to receive tirofiban (group 1) or not (group 2). Serial marker samples were collected before and after coronary angiography in all cases and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) when performed. RESULTS: Between the 2 groups, no differences were observed in clinical and angiographic findings. Percutaneous coronary intervention was globally performed in 198 patients (66%). Of 99 group 2 patients, 26 (26%) received abciximab just before PCI. No significant differences between the 2 groups were observed with regard to cardiac troponin I and CK-MB values at admission and at 6, 12, and 24 hours thereafter; peak values before coronary angiography; and peak values of index event. In addition, the cumulative biomarkers release of the index event was similar between the 2 groups. Major bleeding rate was 2% in group 1 and 1% in group 2 (P = not significant). Composite incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or rehospitalization for ACS at 30 days was 9% in group 1 and 10% in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing early invasive strategy, the adjunctive administration of upstream tirofiban did not reduce the peak values and the cumulative release of myocardial necrosis markers, compared with aspirin, heparin, and clopidogrel given on admission and associated with selective use of abciximab just before PCI.

Abciximab↗

Combination therapy with tirofiban and enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Tirofiban, an intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist, and enoxaparin, a low molecular weight heparin, have each been shown to be effective at reducing cardiac ischemic events compared to unfractionated heparin alone in separate trials of patients with unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. The combination of these agents may offer further therapeutic benefit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients with non-Q-wave myocardial infarction were randomized to receive double-blind treatment with tirofiban (0.1 microgram/kg/min i.v.) for 48-108 h coadministered with either enoxaparin (1 mg/kg sc q 12 h) (n=26) or unfractionated heparin (i.v. adjusted to activated partial-thromboplastin time) (n=27) to evaluate pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety. The primary objective of the study was to investigate the effect of unfractionated heparin versus enoxaparin on the plasma clearance of tirofiban. RESULTS: Coadministration of tirofiban and enoxaparin was generally well tolerated. Plasma clearance of tirofiban was 176.7+/-59.8 and 187.5+/-81.8 ml/min, respectively, for enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin-treated patients (P=NS). The mean difference was well within the prespecified criterion for comparability. Administration of tirofiban with enoxaparin vs. unfractionated heparin resulted in lesser variability and a trend towards greater inhibition of platelet aggregation using 5 microM adenosine phosphate agonist. More patients achieved target inhibition of platelet aggregation >70% in the tirofiban and enoxaparin group (84% vs. 65%, P=0.19). Median bleeding time was 21 min for tirofiban and enoxaparin vs. > or =30 min for tirofiban and unfractionated heparin (P=NS). For a given level of inhibition of platelet aggregation, bleeding time was less prolonged with tirofiban and enoxaparin than tirofiban and unfractionated heparin (adjusted mean bleeding time 19.6 vs. 24.9 min, P=0.02). Tirofiban plasma concentration and clearance were comparable whether coadministered with enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin. There were no major or minor bleeding events in either group by the TIMI criteria. INTERPRETATION: The more consistent inhibition of platelet aggregation and lower adjusted bleeding time of tirofiban and enoxaparin vs. tirofiban and unfractionated heparin support the therapeutic potential of combining these two agents. These data from the first clinical report of coadministration of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist and a low molecular weight heparin are consistent with prior data which show differential pharmacodynamic effects of enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin on platelet aggregation.

Angina, Unstable↗

Comparison of abciximab with "high-dose" tirofiban in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: The TARGET study has been criticised for sub-optimal platelet inhibition with tirofiban. We aimed to compare a high-dose bolus regimen of tirofiban (hd-tirofiban) to standard dose of abciximab for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We assessed consecutive patients who received either hd-tirofiban (25 mcg/kg bolus followed by 0.15 mcg/kg/min infusion for 18 h) or standard dose abciximab. In-hospital and 6-month outcomes were obtained in all cases. RESULTS: Over an 18-month period, 109 patients who received hd-tirofiban were compared with 110 patients who received abciximab. Both hd-tirofiban and abciximab groups had acute coronary syndromes in 86% and 80% and diabetes in 10% and 13% respectively. Most patients had coronary stent implantation (96% vs. 98%). Thrombocytopenia (platelet count< 100,000) developed in 0.9% of patients receiving hd-tirofiban and 2% of patients receiving abciximab (p = 0.566). Bleeding requiring transfusion occurred in 7.3% and 3% of patients respectively (p = 0.118). Peri-procedural troponin rise was 0.9% in patients receiving hd-tirofiban and 5.5% in patients receiving abciximab (p = 0.07). MACE (Myocardial infarction, Stroke, Revascularisation and Death) at 6 months was 23% in the hd-tirofiban group and 20% in the abciximab group (p = 0.711). The pharmaceutical costs were AUD 322 for hd-tirofiban (one ampoule) and AUD 1,350 for abciximab (3 ampoules). CONCLUSION: There was a small increase in bleeding requiring transfusion and a lower rate of peri-procedural troponin rise in the hd-tirofiban group however, the overall 6-month MACE rates were similar in both groups. There was a considerable cost-saving with the use of hd-tirofiban. A prospective randomised trial of hd-tirofiban vs. abciximab is warranted.

Abciximab↗

Tirofiban. A review of its use in acute coronary syndromes.

UNLABELLED: Tirofiban is an intravenously administered nonpeptide glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist which specifically inhibits fibrinogen-dependent platelet aggregation and prolongs bleeding times in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation returns to near-baseline levels within 4 to 8 hours after cessation of a tirofiban infusion, a finding consistent with the drug's elimination half-life of approximately 2 hours. Three large clinical trials have shown that, when administered with a standard heparin and aspirin regimen, tirofiban reduces the risk of ischaemic complications in patients with unstable angina/non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) and in patients undergoing percutaneous revascularisation. In PRISM-PLUS, a study involving 1915 patients with unstable angina/non-Q-wave MI, administration of intravenous tirofiban (0.4 microgram/kg/min loading dose for 30 minutes followed by a 0.10 microgram/kg/min infusion) with heparin for at least 48 (mean 71.3) hours reduced the 7-day risk of the composite end-point of MI, death and refractory ischaemia by 32% compared with heparin alone. The between-group risk reduction remained significant at 30 days (22%) and 6 months (19%). Similarly, in high-risk patients undergoing coronary angioplasty in RESTORE, the addition of tirofiban (10 micrograms/kg bolus in the 3 minutes prior to intervention followed by 0.15 microgram/kg/min for 36 hours) to a standard heparin regimen significantly reduced the risk of ischaemic complications by 38% on day 2 and 27% on day 7 compared with heparin alone. Although interim analysis in PRISM-PLUS showed that the use of tirofiban without heparin increased the 7-day risk of death compared with heparin alone, this finding was inconsistent with the effects of tirofiban on the risk of death in PRISM, a study involving 3232 patients with unstable angina/non-Q-wave MI. Tirofiban is generally well tolerated. Bleeding complications were the most commonly reported events associated with tirofiban in clinical trials, but the rate of major bleeding in tirofiban recipients was not significantly different from that reported with heparin. Thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 90,000 cells/microliter) occurred slightly more frequently with tirofiban (with or without heparin) than with heparin alone. CONCLUSIONS: Tirofiban reduces the risk of ischaemic complications in patients with unstable angina/non-Q-wave MI and high-risk patients undergoing revascularisation when used against a background of heparin and aspirin. Furthermore, the drug has an acceptable tolerability profile. Therefore, intravenous tirofiban is likely to be used as an adjunct to heparin and aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes including high-risk patients undergoing revascularisation.

Acute Disease↗

In vitro and in vivo studies on the metabolism of tirofiban.

Tirofiban hydrochloride [L-tyrosine-N-(butylsulfonyl)-O-[4-(4-piperidinebutyl)] monohydrochloride, is a potent and specific fibrinogen receptor antagonist. Radiolabeled tirofiban was synthesized with either (3)H-label incorporated into the phenyl ring of the tyrosinyl residue or (14)C-label in the butane sulfonyl moiety. Neither human liver microsomes nor liver slices metabolized [(14)C]tirofiban. However, male rat liver microsomes converted a limited amount of the substrate to a more polar metabolite (I) and a relatively less polar metabolite (II). The formation of I was sex dependent and resulted from an O-dealkylation reaction catalyzed by CYP3A2. Metabolite II was identified as a 2-piperidone analog of tirofiban. There was no evidence for Phase II biotransformation of tirofiban by microsomes fortified with uridine-5'-diphospho-alpha-D-glucuronic acid. After a 1 mg/kg i.v. dose of [(14)C]tirofiban, recoveries of radioactivity in rat urine and bile were 23 and 73%, respectively. Metabolite I and unchanged tirofiban represented 70 and 30% of the urinary radioactivity, respectively. Tirofiban represented >90% of the biliary radioactivity. At least three minor biliary metabolites represented the remainder of the radioactivity. One of them was identified as I. Another was identified as II. When dogs received 1 mg/kg i.v. of [(3)H]tirofiban, most of the radioactivity was recovered in the feces as unchanged tirofiban. The plasma half-life of tirofiban was short in both rats and dogs, and tirofiban was not concentrated in tissues other than those of the vasculature and excretory organs.

Animals↗

Initial experience with the low-molecular-weight heparin, enoxaparin, in combination with the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blocker, tirofiban, in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, and tirofiban, an intravenous platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, have each been shown to be effective in reducing cardiac ischemic events compared to unfractionated heparin alone in separate trials of patients with unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction. The combination of these agents may offer further therapeutic benefit. In a pilot study (ACUTE I), fifty-five patients with non-Q wave myocardial infarction were randomized to receive double-blind treatment with tirofiban (0.1 microg/kg/min intravenously) for 48/108 hours co-administered with either enoxaparin (1 mg/kg sc q 12 hours) (n = 26) or unfractionated heparin (intravenous, adjusted to activated partial thromboplastin time) (n = 27). Co-administration of tirofiban and enoxaparin was generally well tolerated. Plasma clearance of tirofiban was similar for enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin-treated patients. When combined with tirofiban, enoxaparin, relative to unfractionated heparin, resulted in less variability and a trend toward greater inhibition of platelet aggregation using 5 microM adenosine phosphate agonist. More patients achieved target inhibition of platelet aggregation (> 70%) in the tirofiban and enoxaparin group (84% versus 65%; p = 0.19). Median bleeding time was 21 minutes for tirofiban and enoxaparin versus 30 minutes for tirofiban and unfractionated heparin (p = non-significant). For a given level of inhibition of platelet aggregation, bleeding time was less prolonged with tirofiban and enoxaparin than tirofiban and unfractionated heparin (adjusted mean bleeding time 19.6 versus 24.9 minutes, respectively; p = 0.02). There were no major or minor bleeding events in either group by the TIMI criteria. The more consistent inhibition of platelet aggregation and lower adjusted bleeding time of tirofiban and enoxaparin versus tirofiban and unfractionated heparin support the therapeutic potential of combining these two agents. These observations have now been extended to more than 500 patients.

Angina, Unstable↗

Platelet inhibition by increased tirofiban dosing during primary coronary angioplasty for ST elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Platelet receptor IIb/IIIa inhibition during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) decreases incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). These effects directly result from the level of platelet inhibition. Due to existing data indicating that standard dosing of tirofiban is insufficient for optimal platelet inhibition, we proposed a novel, experimental dosing. AIM: In this study we assessed, with the use of Ultegra Rapid Platelet Function Assay (RFPA), the level of platelet inhibition with increased tirofiban dosing during primary PCI for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: Twenty eight patients (22 males, 6 females, mean age 63 years, range 32-78 years) with STEMI were included into the study. All patients received 300 mg of aspirin, iv. heparin in a dose of 10 000 IU, which was followed by platelet receptor GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban - 10 micro g/kg iv bolus, 0.4 micro g/kg/min for 30 min and infusion 0.1 micro g/kg/min continued for 12-24 h. Platelet function was assessed with RFPA before tirofiban administration and after 10, 30, 90 minutes as well as 8 hours from the initial dose of tirofiban. Baseline fibrinogen binding to platelet receptor IIb/IIIa was defined as PAU (platelet aggregation unit) and the effects of tirofiban on platelets were expressed as a percentage of platelet inhibition. RESULTS: During in-hospital stay, no deaths, re-infarction nor recurrences of ischaemia requiring intervention were noted. The mean total duration of tirofiban administration was 21 hours. Thrombocytopenia was not observed in any patient. Bleeding complications occurred in 5 (17.9%) patients. Blood transfusion was required in three patients. The percentages of platelet inhibition measured at the pre-specified time-points were 95%, 94%, 91% and 87%, respectively. In 32% of patients an inhibition of platelet exceeding 95%, measured 10 minutes from the onset of tirofiban infusion, was not achieved. At the same time, platelet inhibition <90% was found in only 3 (11%) patients. Eight hours from the initiation of tirofiban, platelet inhibition <70% was found in 3 (11%) patients; of them, two had platelet inhibition <95% when measured 10 minutes from the onset of therapy with tirofiban. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Increased dosing of tirofiban resulted in an enhanced platelet inhibition. 2. Optimal platelet inhibition, especially during first minutes of drug administration, was not achieved in a substantial number of patients. 3. Increased IIb/IIIa inhibitor dosing resulted in a high partial and normal baseline coronary flow in an infarct-related artery. 4. Increased tirofiban dosing resulted in a relatively high bleeding complications rate.

Adult↗

Enhancement by ticlopidine of the inhibitory effect on in vitro platelet aggregation of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban.

We determined the effects of combining the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban (MK-383, Aggrastat) and ticlopidine on inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation, inhibition of collagen-induced platelet aggregation, and prolongation of bleeding time in 5 healthy male volunteers. The study consisted of 2 periods. In period 1, tirofiban was administered intravenously as a bolus injection at a dose of 5.0 microg/kg for 5 min, then as a continuous infusion at a rate of 0.05 microg/kg/min for 5 h 55 min. In period 2, ticlopidine was given orally at a dose of 200 mg once daily for 4 days, after which tirofiban was administered in the same manner as in period 1, starting 2 h after the last dose of ticlopidine. The percent inhibition of platelet aggregation induced by ADP 5 microM at the end of tirofiban infusion in periods 1 and 2 was 73.6 +/- 2.6 and 87.1 +/- 5.7% (mean +/- SD), respectively. The corresponding values for inhibition of platelet aggregation induced by collagen 2 microg/ml were 45.4 +/- 36.1 and 82.8 +/- 27.0%, respectively. In contrast, the percent inhibition of platelet aggregation induced by ADP and collagen after treatment with ticlopidine alone was 15.8 +/- 20.2 and 2.2 +/- 4.8%, respectively. Compared with tirofiban alone, the combination of tirofiban and ticlopidine significantly enhanced inhibition of platelet aggregation induced by both ADP and collagen (p <0.02 and p <0.012, respectively). The inhibitory effects of ticlopidine alone were not statistically significant. Tirofiban prolonged bleeding time both in period 1 and in period 2. However, tirofiban and ticlopidine combined did not affect bleeding time. Ticlopidine administration did not alter the pharmacokinetics of tirofiban. In conclusion, at the doses of tirofiban and ticlopidine used in this study, the combination of the two drugs enhanced inhibition of platelet aggregation but did not prolong bleeding time, suggesting that appropriate doses of tirofiban can be used concomitantly with ticlopidine with no further safety concerns but with potential additional clinical effects.

Adult↗

Tirofiban: an investigational platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist.

The deposition of a platelet rich thrombus on an atherosclerotic plaque is a critical step in the development of unstable coronary syndromes. Currently available therapeutic agents such as aspirin and ticlopidine are relatively weak inhibitors of platelet aggregation. Recently, antagonists to platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa), a platelet surface integrin whose activation and subsequent binding to fibrinogen is the final common step in the formation of platelet aggregates, have been utilised to treat unstable angina and myocardial infarction. Tirofiban is a novel, specific, low molecular weight GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, which competitively inhibits the platelet fibrinogen receptor. Tirofiban is administered as an intravenous infusion with a mean half-life of 1.6 h. In healthy volunteers, the plasma concentration and half-life of tirofiban are unaffected by pre-treatment with aspirin, although aspirin increases the bleeding time prolongation caused by tirofiban. Tirofiban is excreted by both renal (37%) and non renal mechanisms. Three clinical trials, PRISM, PRISM PLUS, and RESTORE, have evaluated the safety and efficacy of tirofiban in unstable angina and in high-risk percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). When compared to heparin in the management of unstable angina, tirofiban decreased the odds of recurrent ischaemia, myocardial infarction, or death by 36% at 48 h, and death by 39% at 30 days. Similarly, the addition of tirofiban to heparin reduced the odds of recurrent ischaemic events for death at 7 days by 34%. RESTORE, a clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of tirofiban in patients undergoing PTCA within 72 h of presentation with unstable angina or myocardial infarction, demonstrated a 38% reduction in a composite end-point at 48 h; the need for urgent PTCA and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) at 30 days was reduced by 36%. Adverse side-effects, including major bleeding, were not significantly higher with tirofiban treatment. Tirofiban and other GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors represent a major advance in the treatment of unstable coronary syndromes and high-risk PTCA.

Journal Article↗

Single high-dose bolus tirofiban with high-loading-dose clopidogrel in primary coronary angioplasty.

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) decreases the incidence of major adverse cardiac events. These effects directly result from the level of platelet inhibition. It was shown that standard dosing of tirofiban is insufficient for optimal platelet inhibition. We sought to determine the efficacy and safety of single high-dose bolus (HDB) tirofiban with high-dose clopidogrel loading in primary PCI in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. A total of 100 patients (mean age 55.2 +/- 9.9 years, male/female = 86/14) undergoing primary PCI, pretreated with clopidogrel (450 mg) and aspirin (325 mg), were consecutively randomized into two groups. Group I (n = 50) received a standard dose bolus of tirofiban (10 microg/kg/3 min) with 24-h infusion at a rate of 0.15 microg/kg/min. Group II received single HDB tirofiban (25 microg/kg/3 min). The assessed angiographic, clinical, and echocardiographic endpoints were: initial and final Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade flow (TGF), corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC), ST-segment resolution (STR) at 90 min, in-hospital bleeding complications, echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), death, reinfarction, and repeat target vessel revascularization at 1 month. Platelet function inhibition was measured using PFA-100 (Behring-Dade, Liederbach, Germany) with a test cartridge unit containing a membrane coated with 2 microg of equine Type I collagen and 50 microg adenosine diphosphate before, and 10 min, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after the bolus of the tirofiban in the first 10 cases of each group. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups. Initial TGF III was more frequent (24% vs 8%, P = 0.029) and the value of CTFC was lower (75 +/- 34 vs 89 +/- 25, P = 0.03) in group II. Postprocedural TGF, CTFC, STR, bleeding complications, and LVEF at 1 month were not different between the two groups. There was a higher rate of reinfarction in group II (8%) compared with group I (2%), but this difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The results of platelet function analyses showed that group II patients had significantly prolonged platelet function assay closure times (299 +/- 6 s) compared with group patients (236 +/- 97 s) at 10 min after the bolus dose (P = 0.04). However, after the first dose between 2 and 24 h, PFA closure times were significantly prolonged in patients with tirofiban infusion. High-dose bolus of tirofiban seems to be safe and more effective than conventional dose at the periprocedural time, whereas continuous infusion of tirofiban may be necessary in the first 24 h before stable and safe antiplatelet status is reached with clopidogrel. However, safety and efficacy of HDB tirofiban and high-loading-dose clopidogrel together with tirofiban infusion requires further studies with a larger population.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗