SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Transgender Persons”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Reproductive Intentions and Fertility Preservation Among Transgender and Nonbinary Individuals: A Cross-Sectional Study in Brazil.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated reproductive intentions, fertility-related knowledge, prior fertility counseling, and factors associated with reproductive intentions among transgender and nonbinary individuals receiving care at a Brazilian public reference center. METHODS: This cross-sectional study with a qualitative component was conducted between July and November 2025 in a specialized gender-affirming care clinic in Brazil. Quantitative data included sociodemographic characteristics, reproductive history, gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT), and fertility-related variables. Logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with desire for future parenthood. Responses to a single open-ended question regarding perceived effects of GAHT on fertility were analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-two participants were included (mean age 27.5 ± 7.4 years). Most identified as transgender men (65.9%), followed by transgender women (26.8%) and nonbinary individuals (7.3%); 79.3% were receiving GAHT. Although 63.4% expressed a desire for future parenthood, only 7.3% had children. Current interest in fertility preservation was reported by 20.8% (15/72). Having children (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.001-0.62; p = 0.023) and each additional year of GAHT duration (aOR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.70-0.99; p = 0.038) were associated with lower odds of desiring future parenthood. Sex assigned at birth was not independently associated with reproductive intentions. Qualitative analysis revealed misconceptions, uncertainty, and conditional beliefs regarding fertility. CONCLUSIONS: Desire for future parenthood was common among transgender and nonbinary individuals, whereas engagement with fertility preservation remained limited. These findings highlight the need for longitudinal, patient-centered reproductive counseling integrated into gender-affirming care.

fertility preservation↗

PubMed2026

Intentions to use different modalities of long-acting HIV PrEP among men who have sex with men and transgender and gender diverse persons in the Netherlands.

Insight into intentions to use long-acting HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is essential for successful implementation. We assessed intention to use three hypothetical long-acting PrEP modalities (oral, intramuscular and subdermal) among HIV-negative men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender and gender diverse persons in Amsterdam, recruited through the Amsterdam Cohort Studies (ACS-participants) and social media (survey-participants). Intention was measured per modality using a 7-point Likert scale. We modeled the probability of high intention to use long-acting PrEP using relative risk regression. Of 1258 participants [1231 (97.9%) MSM; 557 ACS and 701 survey; median age 40 years (IQR 32-50)], 76% had ever used oral short-acting PrEP. Intention to use was highest for monthly oral long-acting PrEP [ACS: median 4.5 (IQR 2-6), 38% high intention; survey: median 7 (IQR 6-7), 81% high intention], followed by 2-monthly intramuscular PrEP [ACS: median 3 (IQR 2-5), 19% high intention; survey: median 5 (IQR 3-7), 47% high intention], and implants [ACS: median 2 (IQR 1-4), 9% high intention; survey: median 4 (IQR 2-7), 37% high intention]. PrEP-experienced participants had higher intention to use oral long-acting PrEP and injectables than PrEP-naïve participants. Offering multiple PrEP modalities may improve the acceptability of HIV prevention strategies and increase PrEP uptake and retention in PrEP care.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Solutions for engaging priority populations in HIV cure research: a hybrid Delphi consensus-building process.

BACKGROUND: To achieve consensus on barriers and strategies to improve the engagement of three priority populations - Black and Latino/a/x individuals, cisgender women, and transgender women in HIV cure research. METHODS: We assembled a panel of 54 experts assigned to six groups in a hybrid Delphi process: (1) HIV community members, (2) biomedical researchers, (3) medical providers, (4) funders and private industry members, (5) bioethicists and regulators, and (6) social scientists. Over 18 months, we conducted four iterative survey rounds and three group discussions to identify barriers and strategies to arrive at a consensus on how to engage these priority populations in HIV cure research. RESULTS: For Black and Latino/a/x populations, the panellists identified inadequate outreach and a lack of accessible educational information as primary barriers and emphasised community-driven engagement and partnerships with trusted leaders as key strategies. For cisgender women, logistical hurdles, caregiving responsibilities and time constraints were identified as major barriers, with flexible trial designs and equitable compensation proposed as solutions. For transgender women, the lack of transgender-focused research design, including misrepresentation and exclusion, was identified as a key barrier, while centring transgender-specific needs in study design achieved consensus as the most effective strategy. CONCLUSION: Among all four priority populations, investment in outreach, engagement along the research process, better integration of health needs with research, and enhanced incentives are not novel ideas, but remain obviously ignored in a way that has led to underrepresentation of people in HIV cure research, who carry the greatest burden of HIV in the U.S. SUMMARY: This paper uses a hybrid Delphi process to identify and reach consensus on key barriers and strategies to engage underrepresented groups: Black and Latino/a/x individuals, cisgender women, and transgender women in HIV cure research across the United States.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Safety and Tolerability of Oral Islatravir Once Monthly as Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in Cisgender Men and Transgender Women Who Have an Elevated Likelihood of HIV-1 Exposure: Results From the IMPOWER-24 Randomized Phase 3 Study.

BACKGROUND: Islatravir once monthly (qm), a nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor with a long half-life, was evaluated for safety and tolerability in cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men and are at increased likelihood of HIV-1 (HIV) exposure. METHODS: IMPOWER-24 (NCT04652700) was a double-blind, Phase 3 study. Participants were randomized 2:1 to islatravir 60 mg oral qm or emtricitabine (FTC; 200 mg) coformulated with either tenofovir disoproxil (245 mg) or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF; 25 mg) once daily (qd). After ∼9 months, blinded islatravir was discontinued due to lymphocyte reductions; participants were offered open-label comparator for 20 months. RESULTS: In total, 494 participants were enrolled (328 islatravir; 166 comparator): 91.5% were cisgender men, 41.7% were White, and median age was 27 years. Mean blinded dosing duration was 4.7 months (islatravir) versus 4.3 months (comparator). Overall, 211 participants (64.3%) in the islatravir group and 128 (77.1%) in the comparator group had ≥1 adverse event (AE). Most AEs were mild or moderate, with 1 AE leading to product discontinuation (islatravir; gastroesophageal reflux). Serious AEs occurred in <2%; none were related to study product. Change in total lymphocytes in the islatravir group at Month 3 was -7.4%; a trend toward recovery was observed after islatravir was stopped. Mean total lymphocytes remained within normal range. No HIV infections occurred in either group during the double-blind phase. CONCLUSIONS: Islatravir qm was generally well tolerated; decreases in total lymphocytes were observed with islatravir. Original primary efficacy objectives were not assessed due to early study stoppage.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Same-day initiation of tenofovir alafenamide-based pre-exposure prophylaxis with drug-level feedback for transgender women in Uganda.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of same-day initiation of emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (F/TAF) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and test the impact of drug-level feedback on PrEP adherence among transgender women (TGW) in Uganda. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: HIV-negative TGW were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to intervention (drug-level feedback with tailored adherence counseling) or standard-of-care (SOC), and followed quarterly for 12 months (November 2021-July 2023; NCT04491422). Quarterly clinic visits included demographic and socio-behavioral data collection, PrEP refills, STI testing, and quarterly PrEP adherence assessment using tenofovir levels in dried blood spots (DBS; long-term) and urine (short-term). RESULTS: We enrolled 200 TGW (100 per arm), median age 21 years. Same-day F/TAF PrEP initiation was 100%. Tenofovir detection in urine (intervention arm) was 79, 80, 85, and 70% at the 3, 6, 9, and 12-month visits, respectively. Tenofovir detection in DBS was 46, 40, 35, and 31% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. Median tenofovir DBS concentrations were 40.6 and 47.0 fmol/punch in intervention and SOC arms, respectively. There was no intervention effect on PrEP adherence (DBS tenofovir levels) [adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) 1.06; 95% CI: 0.82-1.37]. Never being harassed by police for being transgender (aIRR 1.66; 95% CI: 1.24-2.23), history of taking daily medication for more than 7 days (aIRR 1.51; 95% CI: 1.18-1.93) and higher monthly income (aIRR 1.44; 95% CI: 1.10-2.04) were associated with PrEP adherence. CONCLUSION: Oral F/TAF PrEP adherence among TGW in Uganda was low and not affected by drug-level feedback or tailored adherence counseling. Long-acting injectable PrEP formulations should be considered for this population.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Discrimination, chronic stress, and multimorbidity in cohort of Black and Latina transgender women with HIV: Longitudinal findings from the LITE Plus study.

Black and Latina transgender women with HIV (BLTWH) are exposed to repeated, intersecting discrimination based on race, gender, and serostatus. Minority stress theory conceptualizes discrimination as minority-specific stressors that drive health inequities. Allostatic load theory posits a pathway between discrimination and chronic disease through multisystem physiological dysregulation caused by chronic stress. To test this pathway, a longitudinal cohort of 108 BLTWH, enrolled December 2020 - June 2022 in Boston, New York City, and Washington, DC, were followed for 24 months, with biomarkers measured at baseline, 12, and 24 months. Questionnaires administered every 6 months assessed anticipated discrimination, everyday discrimination, perceived stress, and other psychosocial factors. Multimorbidity was measured via self-reported non-HIV chronic conditions. In mixed-effects mediation models, allostatic load did not mediate relationships between multimorbidity outcomes and anticipated discrimination (β: -0.0004 [95% CI: -0.004, 0.003]) nor everyday discrimination (β: -0.002 [95%CI: -0.009, 0.003]). Perceived stress demonstrated indirect effects on multimorbidity in unadjusted models of anticipated discrimination (β: 0.024, [95% CI: 0.015, 0.081]) and everyday discrimination (β: 0.021 [95%CI: 0.016, 0.077]). Indirect effects remained significant, with attenuated effects (β: 0.020 for anticipated discrimination; β: 0.017 for everyday discrimination) after adjusting for social support, community connection, and resilient coping. Total effects were only significant for the adjusted model of everyday discrimination (β: 0.056 [0.014, 0.099]). Findings suggest discrimination impacted health through specific psychosocial pathways. Alongside efforts to eliminate intersectional discrimination, stress-lowering interventions and increased access to social support and community connection may be effective approaches to reducing multimorbidity in this highly marginalized group.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Healing from within: A randomized controlled trial of a novel expressive writing intervention among trans and gender expansive adults.

Transgender and gender expansive (TGE) populations in the United States experience high rates of mental health disparities. High rates of depressive and anxiety symptoms have been linked to a host of stigma-related stressors and exacerbated by decreased access to competent and affirming formalized health care supports, particularly in the face of legislation aiming to curb access. As a result, intervention strategies that can be made widely available, accessed at no cost, and address these stressors to improve mental health and well-being are needed. This study presents findings from a self-administered online mental health intervention, titled Reflections to (re)Claim an Affirmed Identity to Improve Mental Health (RECLAIM), which used an expressive writing approach to address internalized anti-TGE stigma to reduce depressive and anxiety symptoms and improve perceived community connectedness. In this randomized controlled trial, 115 TGE community adults were assigned to one of three study conditions: two RECLAIM interventions and one expressive writing active control group. Analysis of between-group effects found that all three groups experienced similar levels of improvement in mental health over time, while within-group effects of time by condition demonstrated some notable differences in the overall trajectory of treatment or control effects. Overall, results of this randomized controlled trial provide preliminary empirical support for the efficacy of RECLAIM in reducing depressive and anxiety symptoms and internalized anti-TGE stigma and improving community connectedness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

"Will it be enough to be respected?": understanding personal, institutional, and societal harms and benefits of genomics research.

BACKGROUND: Transgender Identity Genomics Research (TIGR)-research examining potential associations between genetic factors and transgender, nonbinary, and gender diverse (trans) identities-takes place in a complex landscape with significant potential to either benefit or harm trans communities. As public and political scrutiny of trans communities intensifies, the stakes and potential impacts of TIGR are heightened and ethical, legal and social implications must be considered. To better understand how those who would be most affected by TIGR view such research, we explored trans adults' perceptions of TIGR in the current environment and how they perceive TIGR may impact their futures. METHODS: Using a community-based participatory research approach, we partnered with a trans-led Executive Stakeholder Board to conduct in-depth interviews with 31 trans adults in the United States between June-December 2024 and conducted a Reflexive Thematic Analysis. RESULTS: Participants (mean age=34 years, range=19-73 years; 61% people of color; 39% nonbinary, 39% transgender women, 22% transgender men) identified possible benefits of TIGR such as personal affirmation, increased social acceptance, and improved access to gender-affirming healthcare. They also expressed concerns about potential harms, including further stigmatization, discrimination, and pathologization of trans identities. While most viewed research in trans communities (including TIGR) as a net positive, some participants felt it less useful compared to addressing more urgent, material challenges trans communities face. CONCLUSION: Our findings underscore that TIGR, like all scientific research, is shaped by the sociopolitical environment. It is imperative that TIGR researchers engage meaningfully and ethically with trans communities to minimize potential harms and center community needs.

Genetics↗