SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Tumor Suppressor Protein p14ARF”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

The p14ARF tumor suppressor protein facilitates nucleolar sequestration of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha (HIF-1alpha ) and inhibits HIF-1-mediated transcription.

Oncogenic alterations can influence tumor cell survival partly by affecting the activity of the hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) transcription factor. The alpha subunit of HIF-1 was found to be frequently overexpressed in advanced tumors, which was proposed to help the adaptation of tumor cells to hypoxia. Here we show that an important tumor suppressor protein, p14ARF (alternative reading frame product of the INK4A locus) can directly inhibit the transcriptional activity of HIF-1 by sequestering its alpha subunit into the nucleolus. The interaction requires neither p53 nor HDM2. This is one of the first reports that describe the interaction of p14ARF with a protein besides HDM2, which may define a p53-independent tumor suppressor activity for p14ARF.

Active Transport, Cell Nucleus↗

PubMed2003

p14ARF induces the relocation of HDM2 and p53 to extranucleolar sites that are targeted by PML bodies and proteasomes.

BACKGROUND: p14ARF is a protein product of the alternative reading frame of the human INK4a locus. It functions as a tumor suppressor protein. p14ARF suppresses growth through p53-dependent and p53-independent pathways. RESULTS: p14ARF protein localizes primarily to the nucleoli. Here we show that in transfected cells p14ARF also appears in Hsp70 positive extranucleolar inclusions. The formation of p14ARF inclusions induces the parallel re-localization p53 and HDM2 to these sites that are also targeted by PML bodies and proteasomes. CONCLUSION: Our data show that co-localization between p53, HDM2 and p14ARF occurs at extranucleolar sites. Accumulation of PML and proteasomes at these sites suggest that the components of the nuclear inclusions are targeted for proteasome-mediated degradation.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Inactivation of the INK4A/ARF locus frequently coexists with TP53 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer.

Inactivation of the P16 (INK4A)/retinoblastoma (RB) or TP53 biochemical pathway is frequent event in most human cancers. Recent evidence has shown that P14ARF binds to MDM2 leading to an increased availability of wild type TP53 protein. Functional studies also support a putative tumor suppressor gene function for p14ARF suggesting that p14ARF or p53 inactivation may be functionally equivalent in tumorigenesis. To study the relative contribution of each pathway in tumorigenesis, we analysed and compared alterations of the p16, p14ARF and p53 genes in 38 primary non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) (19 adenocarcinomas and 19 squamous carcinoma). The p16 tumor suppressor gene was inactivated in 22 of 38 (58%) tumors. Twelve of these samples (31%) had homozygous deletions by microsatellite analysis; eight of them (21%) had p16 promoter hypermethylation detected by Methylation Specific PCR (MSP) and the remaining two (5%) harbored a point mutation in exon 2 by sequence analysis. The absence of P16 protein in every case was confirmed by immunohistochemistry. Fourteen of the 22 tumors with p16 inactivation also inactivated the p14ARF gene (12 with homozygous deletions extending into INK4a/ARF and two with exon 2 mutations). Mutations of p53 were found in 18 (47%) of the tumors and nine of them (50%) harbored p14ARF inactivation. Thus, an inverse correlation was not found between p14ARF and p53 genetic alterations (P=0.18; Fisher Exact Test). Our data confirm that the p16 gene is frequently inactivated in NSCLC. Assuming that 9p deletion occurs first, the common occurrence of p53 and p14ARF alterations suggests that p14ARF inactivation is not functionally equivalent to abrogation of the TP53 pathway by p53 mutation.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗

PubMed2003

Enhanced tumor suppression by a p14ARF/p53 bicistronic adenovirus through increased p53 protein translation and stability.

The p53 tumor suppressor controls a cell cycle arrest and apoptosis pathway that is central to tumor suppression and often disrupted in cancer. The accumulation and activity of p53 are positively controlled by the p14/ARF tumor suppressor and full restoration of the pathway in cancer cells may require that both p53 and p14ARF be supplied [corrected]. To address this issue, we have constructed a bicistronic adenoviral vector encoding the two proteins (Adp14/p53) and compared its tumor suppressor activity with that of a single gene vector for p53 (Adp53). We find that tumor cells treated with Adp14/p53 undergo a much sharper decrease in viability with increasing multiplicities of infection than do cells treated with Adp53, even when cells express endogenous p14ARF. Adp14/p53 is also more effective than is a combination of single gene vectors for p14 and p53. The sharper decrease in cell viability after treatment of cells with Adp14/p53 correlates with an increased rate of p53 protein synthesis and a decreased rate of p53 protein turnover, leading to increased steady-state levels of p53 protein and increased levels of p53 downstream targets mdm2, p21waf1, and bax. Adp14/p53 treatment leads to an elevated bax:bcl2 ratio and induction of apoptosis in vitro and in vivo, coupled with a failure of the tumor cells to induce neovascularization in vivo. The results indicate that endogenous p14ARF expression may be insufficient to ensure efficient accumulation of ectopic p53 after gene transfer and demonstrate that for tumor suppression, bicistronic coexpression of p14ARF and p53 is superior to p53 alone. The results show that in this setting, p14ARF promotes p53 accumulation by increasing p53 protein synthesis, in addition to its well-characterized ability to oppose mdm2-mediated degradation of p53.

Adenoviridae↗

PubMed2006

Regulation of the p14ARF-Mdm2-p53 pathway: an overview in breast cancer.

Knowledge of the roles of proteins that are abnormally suppressed or activated due to mutation in the DNA sequences of the common tumor suppressor genes, p14ARF and p53, is critical to the understanding the pathogenesis of breast cancer. Mdm2 is a mediator for the function of both p14ARF and p53. In this review article factors including Pokemon, Geminin, Twist, and Apigenin, which control the action of individual proteins in the p14ARF-Mdm2-p53 pathway in breast cancer as well the consequences of mutation 7 of p53 are discussed. The complexity of interaction of components of the pathway and the underlying development of cancer is emphasized. Opportunities for future therapeutic innovations are indicated.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed2003

Alteration of keratinocyte differentiation and senescence by the tumor promoter dioxin.

Exposure to the environmental contaminant dioxin, elicits a variety of responses, which includes tumor promotion, embryotoxicity/teratogenesis, and carcinogenesis in both animals and humans. Many of the effects of dioxin are mediated by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), a ligand-activated bHLH (basic helix-loop-helix)/PAS transcription factor. We initiated this study to determine whether dioxin's tumor-promoting activities may lie in its ability to alter proliferation, differentiation, and/or senescence using normal human epidermal keratinocytes (HEKs). Here, we report that dioxin appears to accelerate differentiation as measured by flow cytometry and by increased expression of the differentiation markers involucrin and filaggrin. In addition, dioxin appears to increase proliferation as indicated by an increase in NADH/NADPH production and changes in cell cycle. Finally, dioxin decreases SA (senescence associated) beta-galactosidase staining, an indicator of senescence, in the differentiating keratinocytes. These changes were accompanied by decreases in the expression levels of key cell cycle regulatory proteins p53, p16INK4a, and p14ARF. Our findings support the idea that dioxin may exert its tumor-promoting actions, in part, by downregulating the expression levels of key tumor suppressor proteins, which may impair the cell's ability to maintain its appropriate cellular status.

Carcinogens↗

PubMed1999

Frequent co-alterations of TP53, p16/CDKN2A, p14ARF, PTEN tumor suppressor genes in human glioma cell lines.

In this study we established the simultaneous status of TP53, p16, p14ARF and PTEN tumor suppressor genes in 34 randomly chosen human glioma cell lines. Nine cell lines (26.4%) harbored mutations or deletions in all four tumor suppressor genes and 22 cell lines (64%) had alterations in at least three. Mutations/deletions were found at the following frequencies: TP53 (76.5%), p14ARF (64.7%), p16 (64.7%), PTEN (73.5%). Thus, there was a high incidence of alterations in the cellular pathways involving the p53 transcription factor (94.1%), the retinoblastoma protein (64.7%) and the PTEN phosphatase (73.5%) and 91% of cell lines carried mutations in two or more pathways. This provides the first clear genetic evidence that these tumor suppressors participate in biological pathways which are functioning separately/independently in glioma cells. The status of the gene alterations did not correlate with tumorigenicity in immunocompromized mice or any clinical parameters. Although the mutation rate was higher in glioma cell lines than that reported for glioma tissues, the alterations were molecularly representative of those found in adult de novo glioblastoma. This study highlights the importance of developing therapeutic approaches applicable to tumors with a broad range of genetic alterations and also provides an invaluable panel of glioma cell lines to make this possible.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

A major functional difference between the mouse and human ARF tumor suppressor proteins.

Suppression of tumorigenesis is considerably more stringent in the human than in the much shorter lived mouse species, and the reasons for this difference are poorly understood. We investigated functional differences in the control of the ARF (alternative reading frame) protein that acts upstream of p53 and is encoded along with p16(INK4a) at a major tumor suppressor locus in both the human and mouse genomes. The mouse and human ARF proteins are substantially divergent at their carboxyl termini. We have shown that the mouse ARF protein (p19ARF) interacts with Pex19p in the cell cytoplasm leading to its nuclear exclusion and repression of its p53 activation function. The human ARF protein (p14ARF) is substantially smaller than its mouse counterpart and is not subject to this functional inactivation by Pex19p. In an identical cellular background, ribozymes directed against Pex19p enhanced p19ARF- but not p14ARF-activated p53 function. This is the first demonstration of a functional difference between the mouse and human ARF proteins. In view of the major role of ARF in tumor suppression, this distinction may contribute to the different levels of tumor proneness of these species.

3T3 Cells↗

PubMed2005

p14ARF protein expression is a predictor of both relapse and survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the anterior tongue.

PURPOSE: The INK4A-ARF locus at chromosome 9p21 is frequently altered in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and encodes two distinct tumor suppressors, p16(INK4A) and p14(ARF). This study addressed the role of p14(ARF) as a potential prognostic marker in this disease. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: p14(ARF) protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 140 patients with SCC of the anterior tongue. Using univariate and multivariate Cox's proportional hazards models, the outcomes examined were time to disease recurrence or death, with or without clinicopathologic covariates, including nodal status, disease stage, treatment status, Ki-67 staining, and molecular markers with known functional or genetic relationships with p14(ARF) (p16(INK4A), p53, pRb, p21(WAF1/CIP1), E2F-1). RESULTS: On multivariate analysis, p14(ARF) positivity (nucleolar p14(ARF) staining and/or nuclear p14(ARF) staining in >/=30% of tumor cells) was an independent predictor of improved disease-free survival (DFS; P = 0.002) and overall survival (OS; P = 0.002). This was further enhanced when p14(ARF) positivity was cosegregated with positive (>/=1%) p16(INK4A) staining (DFS, P < 0.001; OS, P < 0.001). Patients whose cancers were p14(ARF) negative and p53 positive (>50%) had the poorest outcome (DFS, P < 0.001; OS, P < 0.001) of any patient subgroup analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that in patients with SCC of the tongue, combined nuclear and nucleolar expression of p14(ARF) protein predicts for improved DFS and OS independent of established prognostic markers.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗

PubMed2002

Promoter methylations of p16INK4a and p14ARF genes in early and advanced gastric cancer. Correlations of the modes of their occurrence with histologic type.

The INK4a/ARF locus encodes two cell cycle-regulatory proteins, p16INK4a and p14ARF. These share an exon using different reading frames, and act through Rb and p53 pathways. Recently, it has been found that silencing of p16INK4a and p14ARF expressions by aberrant methylation of the CpG islands in the promoter regions is an alternative mechanism that inactivates possible tumor suppressor functions in various tumors. To clarify the features of gastric cancers with promoter methylation of p16INK4a and p14ARF, we investigated the methylation status in gastric cancer cell lines and primary gastric cancers using methylation-specific PCR (MSP), and correlated the methylation status with microsatellite instability (MSI), DNA ploidy pattern, p53 immunohistochemistry, and various clinicopathologic factors, paying attention to the correlations with the histologic types. Of 10 cell lines studied, silencing of the expression of p16INK4a and p14ARF due to promoter methylation was detected by MSP and RT-PCR in six (60%) and two (20%) cell lines, respectively. p14ARF silencing was detected only in cell lines derived from gastric cancer of the diffuse type, while p16INK4a silencing was found in cell lines derived from both diffuse and intestinal types. In 59 primary gastric cancers, promoter methylation of p16INK4a and p14ARF was found in 10 (17%) and 14 (24%) of the tumors independently, there being an association with DNA diploidy, but not with p53 immunohistochemistry. p16INK4a methylation was found irrespective of tumor stages and histology. Whereas p14ARF methylation was found more frequently in intestinal type cancers in an early stage and in diffuse type cancers in an advanced stage, MSI tended to be related especially to p14ARF methylation in cancers of the intestinal type. Thus, the significance of p14ARF methylation differed between intestinal and diffuse types, while such a difference was not observed in p16INK4a methylation.

CpG Islands↗

PubMed2005

9p21 locus analysis in high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors characterized for c-kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha gene alterations.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are noncomplex sarcomas that often are due to c-kit-activating and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha gene (PDGFRalpha)-activating mutations and perturbations of their related signaling pathways. Molecular and cytogenetic findings have indicated correlations between tumor progression and high-risk GISTs with c-kit mutations, the overexpression of genes such as ezrin, and losses at 9p. In particular, it was reported recently that malignant GISTs showed alterations in the p16INK4a gene located at the 9p21 locus. METHODS: To assess the involvement of p14ARF and p15INK4b in addition to p16INK4a in GISTs, the authors undertook a molecular and cytogenetic study of the 9p21 locus. A series of 22 pre-Gleevec era, cryopreserved, high-risk GISTs that were characterized well in terms of KIT and PDGFRalpha receptors were investigated for mRNA expression, homozygous deletions, mutations, and promoter methylation of locus 9p21, in some instances complemented by fluorescent in situ hybridization studies. RESULTS: The results indicated the loss of p16INK4a mRNA expression in 41% of the GISTs, mainly due to the homozygous deletion of both the p16INK4a gene and the p14ARF gene (24%). No mutations were found, and promoter methylation (detected by means of methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction analysis in 27% of tumors) was restricted mainly to the p15INK4b gene (20%). It is noteworthy that, in all of the methylated GISTs, the epigenetic promoter alteration was coupled with mRNA expression. CONCLUSIONS: Alterations in the 9p21 locus were found cumulatively in 54% of the tumors in the current series and were represented mainly by the loss of tumor suppressor gene expression. The p16INK4a deletion, which always was coupled with p14ARF gene loss, seemed to be the most common 9p21 inactivation mechanism.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Independence of the prognostic value of tumor suppressor protein expression in ovarian adenocarcinomas: A multivariate analysis of expression of p53, retinoblastoma, and related proteins.

Accurate estimation of prognosis of ovarian cancer is difficult. For this report, in a group of 73 patients with ovarian adenocarcinomas, clinical factors and protein expression status of p53, retinoblastoma (Rb), and related proteins were evaluated for potential prognostic values. Clinical factors included FIGO stage, age, histopathologic type, and protein expression of p53, Rb, MDM2, p14ARF, p21WAF(1)/CIP(1) was determined by an immunohistochemical technique. Univariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to determine the significant prognostic value of FIGO stage (P < 0.0001), p53 status (0.0021), and patient age (P = 0.0255), and we report here, for the first time, the significant (P = 0.0072) prognostic value of Rb status. Histopathologic type and MDM2, p14ARF, p21WAF(1)/CIP(1) status did not show any prognostic value. To examine further the independence of prognostic values, we next applied multivariate analysis: We found that FIGO stage (P < 0.0001) and p53 status (P = 0.0108) were independent prognostic factors, while age and Rb status were not. Independence of prognostic value of p53 has heretofore been controversial, but we found a definite independent prognostic value for p53 status in ovarian adenocarcinomas. We also found that selection of appropriate antibodies for immunohistochemistry was essential to obtain significant results. We used five kinds of antibodies for p53 immunolocalization, and correlation with prognosis was obtained by three of these with different grades of statistical significance.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2006

p14ARF activates a Tip60-dependent and p53-independent ATM/ATR/CHK pathway in response to genotoxic stress.

p14ARF is a tumor suppressor that controls a well-described p53/Mdm2-dependent checkpoint in response to oncogenic signals. Here, new insights into the tumor-suppressive function of p14ARF are provided. We previously showed that p14ARF can induce a p53-independent G2 cell cycle arrest. In this study, we demonstrate that the activation of ATM/ATR/CHK signaling pathways contributes to this G2 checkpoint and highlight the interrelated roles of p14ARF and the Tip60 protein in the initiation of this DNA damage-signaling cascade. We show that Tip60 is a new direct p14ARF binding partner and that its expression is upregulated and required for ATM/CHK2 activation in response to p14ARF. Strikingly, both p14ARF and Tip60 products accumulate following a cell treatment with alkylating agents and are absolutely required for ATM/CHK2 activation in this setting. Moreover, and consistent with p14ARF being a determinant of CHK2 phosphorylation in lung carcinogenesis, a strong correlation between p14ARF and phospho-CHK2 (Thr68) protein expression is observed in human lung tumors (P < 0.00006). Overall, these data point to a novel regulatory pathway that mediates the p53-independent negative-cell-growth control of p14ARF. Inactivation of this pathway is likely to contribute to lung carcinogenesis.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

N-terminal polyubiquitination and degradation of the Arf tumor suppressor.

Unknown mechanisms govern degradation of the p19Arf tumor suppressor, an activator of p53 and inhibitor of ribosomal RNA processing. Kinetic metabolic labeling of cells with [3H]-leucine indicated that p19Arf is a relatively stable protein (half-life approximately 6 h) whose degradation depends upon the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Although p19Arf binds to the Mdm2 E3 ubiquitin protein ligase to activate p53, neither of these molecules regulates p19Arf turnover. In contrast, the nucleolar protein nucleophosmin/B23, which binds to p19Arf with high stoichiometry, retards its turnover, and Arf mutants that do not efficiently associate with nucleophosmin/B23 are unstable and functionally impaired. Mouse p19Arf, although highly basic (22% arginine content), contains only a single lysine residue absent from human p14ARF, and substitution of arginine for lysine in mouse p19Arf had no effect on its rate of degradation. Mouse p19Arf (either wild-type or lacking lysine) and human p14ARF undergo N-terminal polyubiquitination, a process that has not as yet been documented in naturally occurring lysine-less proteins. Re-engineering of the p19Arf N terminus to provide consensus sequences for N-acetylation limited Arf ubiquitination and decelerated its turnover.

Acetylation↗

PubMed2004

p14ARF is a component of the p53 response following ionizing irradiation of normal human fibroblasts.

Ionizing radiation leads to rapid stabilization and activation of the p53 tumor suppressor. Previous reports demonstrate that murine p19ARF cooperates with p53 in the cellular response to gamma irradiation. Here, we show that endogenous ARF sequentially interacts with p53 and MDM2 following irradiation of primary human and mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Shortly after irradiation, p14ARF binds p53 independently of MDM2. As nuclear pools of p53 decline, endogenous p14ARF co-immunoprecipitates with MDM2 and is localized within the nucleolus. Interestingly, p14ARF nucleolar localization during this response is abrogated in cells lacking functional p53. Taken together, our data suggest that human and murine ARF contribute to the mammalian DNA damage response.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

p53 gene mutation and ink4a-arf deletion appear to be two mutually exclusive events in human glioblastoma.

P16 and P14ARF are two tumor suppressors encoded by the locus ink4a-arf which is frequently deleted in human tumors. Recent experiments performed with mouse embryonic fibroblasts have shown that P14ARF is an upstream regulator of the P53 pathway. This raises the question as to whether in human tumors the loss of p14arf and mutation of p53 are mutually exclusive events which segregate with genetic alterations at other loci. To examine this question we performed a multigenic analysis on 29 gliomas. We analysed p53 and p14arf in relation with five other genetic loci encoding the most frequently mutated genes in human gliomas: cdkn2a, mdm2, egfr, pten and the chromosomal regions 10q23.3 and 10q25-26. Our study shows for the first time that p53 mutations and p14arf deletions appear mutually exclusive in human glioblastoma, suggesting that they may be functionally redundant in glioma tumorigenesis. The P53 pathway is, therefore, disrupted in 81.8% of malignant gliomas (WHO grades III and IV), either by mutation of the p53 gene (31.8%) or by p14arf deletion (54.5%). These tumors further showed MDM2 overexpression (9.1%), egfr oncogene amplification/egfr overexpression (50%), pten mutations (27.3%) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the chromosomal regions 10q23.3 (86.4%) and 10q25-26 (100%). These alterations did not segregate with p53 mutations or p14arf deletions, while p14arf and cdkn2a were always deleted.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

ONYX-015 selectivity and the p14ARF pathway.

ONYX-015, dl1520, is an adenovirus that lacks the E1B 55K gene and therefore lacks the capacity to neutralize p53 during infection. This virus induces high levels of p53 and fails to grow efficiently in primary epithelial cells. However, it does replicate in many tumor cells, including those expressing wild-type p53. In these cells, ONYX-015 fails to induce active p53. This is because the pathway from Ela to p53 is disrupted through loss of p14ARF. We propose that high levels of Mdm2 activity resulting from loss of p14ARF, and high levels of Mdm2 protein resulting from activated Ras prevent accumulation of functional p53 during infection of tumor cells that retain wild-type p53.

Adenoviruses, Human↗

PubMed2002

Hypophosphorylation of Mdm2 augments p53 stability.

The Mdm2 protein mediates ubiquitylation and degradation of p53 and is a key regulator of this tumor suppressor. More recently, it has been shown that Mdm2 is highly phosphorylated within its central acidic domain. In order to address the issue of how these modifications might regulate Mdm2 function, putative phosphorylation sites within this domain were substituted, individually or in pairs, with alanine residues. Mutants with serine-to-alanine substitutions between residues 244 and 260 abolished or at least reduced the capacity of Mdm2 to promote p53 degradation. In each case, loss of degradation function was independent of the ability to bind to p53 or p14ARF. Moreover, each of the Mdm2 mutants completely retained the capacity to act as a ubiquitin ligase in vivo. Thus, ubiquitylation and degradation can be uncoupled. Two-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping coupled with the use of phospho-specific antibodies revealed that Mdm2 is phosphorylated physiologically at several sites within this region, consistent with the idea that phosphorylation is important for Mdm2 activity. Strikingly, treatment of cells with ionizing radiation resulted in a significant decrease in the phosphorylation of residues that are important for p53 turnover. This hypophosphorylation preceded p53 accumulation. These findings indicate that Mdm2 contributes an additional function toward the degradation of p53 that is distinct from its ubiquitin ligase activity and is regulated by phosphorylation. Our model suggests that hypophosphorylation of Mdm2 in response to ionizing irradiation inactivates this novel function, thereby contributing to p53 stabilization.

Amino Acid Sequence↗