PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Upadacitinib”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Upadacitinib Among Patients in East Asia With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Post Hoc Subanalysis of Randomized Phase 3 Studies.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Upadacitinib, a selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, is approved to treat moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). This post hoc subanalysis evaluated the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of upadacitinib in patients in East Asia. METHODS: U-ACHIEVE (UC1; NCT02819635) and U-ACCOMPLISH (UC2; NCT03653026) were Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, induction studies evaluating upadacitinib 45 mg or placebo daily in adults with moderately to severely active UC. Clinical responders to 8 weeks of upadacitinib induction were eligible to receive upadacitinib 15 mg, upadacitinib 30 mg, or placebo daily in the 52-week U-ACHIEVE maintenance study (UC3; NCT02819635). Efficacy outcomes, safety, and pharmacokinetics were evaluated among East Asian patients. RESULTS: A higher proportion of East Asian patients achieved clinical remission with upadacitinib than placebo at induction Week 8 (UC1: n = 127, 31.4% vs. 7.3%; UC2: n = 114, 31.2% vs. 2.7%) and maintenance Week 52 (UC3: n = 184, upadacitinib 15 mg, 52.4%; upadacitinib 30 mg, 53.8%; placebo, 10.7%). Rates of endoscopic outcomes were higher with upadacitinib than with placebo across studies. No new safety signals were identified. Herpes zoster occurrences were low (UC1 and UC2: upadacitinib 45 mg, two events [in one patient]; placebo, zero events; UC3: upadacitinib 15 mg, five events; upadacitinib 30 mg, eight events; placebo, zero events). Pharmacokinetics and trends in the relationship between upadacitinib exposure and efficacy were consistent in the East Asian and global populations. CONCLUSION: Upadacitinib was generally well tolerated and effective for treating moderately to severely active UC in patients in East Asia, with a favorable benefit-risk profile consistent with the global population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02819635, NCT03653026.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in Behçet syndrome: systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES: Given the active role of the JAK signaling pathway and the multifactorial immune mediators observed in Behçet syndrome (BS), JAK inhibitors (JAKi) may be promising agents. In this systematic literature review (SLR), we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of JAKi in BS. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library to identify all reports on the efficacy and safety of JAKi in patients with BS. The SLR protocol was registered with the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (CRD420251000172). We additionally presented our patient with gastrointestinal involvement treated with upadacitinib. RESULTS: Among the 92 patients (48 men, mean (SD) age 38.5 (13.5) years), 46 used tofacitinib, 31 used baricitinib, and 15 used upadacitinib. All but 1 patient had used at least one previous conventional immunosuppressive, and 57.6% were refractory to at least one prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor. JAKi were used in combination with conventional immunosuppressive and/or glucocorticoids in 90.6% of the patients. The primary indication for JAKi initiation was gastrointestinal involvement in 46 (50%) patients including our patient, vascular involvement in 22 (23.9%), uveitis in 19 (20.6%), and mucocutaneous and/or articular involvement in 5 (5.6%) patients. The remission rates for overall, gastrointestinal, vascular, and eye involvement were 85.9%, 82.6%, 90.9%, and 84.2%. Serious adverse events were observed in 5.4% of the patients. No thrombotic events were reported. CONCLUSION: This SLR showed that JAKi may be effective in refractory BS patients with a favorable safety profile.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in Behçet's disease: A systematic literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Behçet's disease e (BD) is a chronic, relapsing, multisystem inflammatory disorder that if not successfully treated can lead to severe, organ or life-threatening complications. Despite treatment with glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, some patients still have refractory disease that mandates additional therapeutic options. The pathogenesis of BD involves dysregulated innate and adaptive immune responses with multiple cytokines signaling through the Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway. By targeting multiple inflammatory pathways, JAK inhibitors have emerged as a promising therapeutic option. However, current evidence remains limited and heterogeneous. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review to evaluate their efficacy and safety in BD. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO registration: CRD420261381955). PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to March 2026. Original clinical studies evaluating Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in BD were included. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Due to heterogeneity, results were synthesized narratively, focusing on efficacy and safety outcomes. RESULTS: Seventeen studies (99 patients) were included, predominantly case reports and small observational cohorts with overall high methodological quality. All evaluated tofacitinib, baricitinib, or upadacitinib, with no data on other JAK inhibitors. Patients were highly treatment-refractory, with prior failure of conventional and biologic therapies. Upadacitinib was the most frequently studied agent and demonstrated an overall response rate of 85.2% and complete remission in 59.3% in a multi-center study. Efficacy was observed across multiple domains, with the most consistent responses in intestinal disease, including clinical and endoscopic remission, alongside frequent glucocorticoid-sparing effects. Safety findings were consistent with known JAK inhibitor safety profiles, with mainly mild to moderate infections and manageable laboratory abnormalities, and no clear signal for increased thrombotic events, although follow-up was limited. CONCLUSION: JAK inhibitors demonstrate promising efficacy in BD, particularly in refractory and multisystem disease. The most consistent evidence of efficacy was observed in gastrointestinal involvement, whereas data for other disease domains remain limited. Their safety profile appears consistent with existing data, although further follow up and validation is required. High-quality randomized controlled studies are an imminent need to study the potential role of JAK inhibitors in BD.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Incidence of acne in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with Janus kinase inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are effective oral therapies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). While acne is a known adverse event in dermatological cohorts, its incidence and risk factors in the IBD population are not well-defined. We aimed to determine the pooled incidence of acne in IBD patients treated with JAK inhibitors and to explore this risk across key clinical subgroups. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to September 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting acne incidence in IBD patients on JAK inhibitors. Data were pooled using a random-effects generalized linear mixed-effects model. Pre-specified subgroup analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 50 studies (5 RCTs, 45 observational) involving 9902 IBD patients were included. The overall pooled incidence of acne was 8.6% (95% CI: 6.4%-11.6%). Acne rates were significantly higher (P < .0001) with the upadacitinib (12.2%), compared to tofacitinib (2.6%) and filgotinib (2.3%). A numerically higher incidence was observed during induction (8.6%) versus maintenance (4.2%) therapy, though this difference was not statistically significant (P = .07). The incidence was significantly higher in the pediatric population (12.2%) compared to adults (7.4%) (P = .03). In RCTs, JAK inhibitors were associated with significantly increased odds of acne compared to placebo (OR 2.43, 95% CI: 1.33-4.43, P = .019). No statistically significant difference was observed by IBD subtype. CONCLUSION: Acne is a common adverse event in IBD patients treated with JAK inhibitors. The reported incidence of acne was significantly higher with upadacitinib, in the pediatric population, and numerically higher during the induction phase of treatment.

Humans↗