PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Urobilinogen”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1968

Renal excretion of urobilinogen in the dog.

The renal excretion of urobilinogen was studied in dogs by standard clearance techniques. The use of radiochemically pure tritiated mesobilirubinogen as a representative urobilinogen afforded much greater analytical precision than can be obtained with the usual colorimetric and fluorimetric techniques which are only semiquantitative. With constant plasma levels of urobilinogen, raising urinary pH from 5 to 8 increased urobilinogen excretion from about 30% to up to 200% of the filtered load. When urinary pH was kept constant, changes in blood pH had no effect on urobilinogen excretion. Increases in urinary flow had no effect on urobilinogen excretion when the urine was alkaline but increased excretion markedly during aciduria. Probenecid did not influence urobilinogen excretion by the kidney. It is concluded that urobilinogen is excreted by a three-component system of glomerular filtration, active secretion, and pH-dependent nonionic diffusion in the distal nephron. Urobilinogen is a weak acid, and this mode of excretion is similar to that of other weak, organic acids, such as salicylates. These results indicate that urinary pH and flow must be considered in the clinical interpretation of measurements of urinary urobilinogen.

Acidosis↗
PubMed1981

Calibration of a strip test for urinary urobilinogen using a mercuric chloride assay with crystalline reference standards.

A strip test based on Ehrlich's reaction has improved specificity for urobilinogen in urine. Strip reactions are calibrated in mg/dl using a recently developed reference assay which is based on a mercuric chloride reaction and includes a crystalline reference standard. Strip reactions correlate well with the mercuric assay when the urine sample contains only urobilinogen. If a urine contains urobilin in addition to urobilinogen, the strip test gives slightly lower values than the reference assay. The strip test reacts only with urobilinogen but the reference assay measures urobilin as well as urobilinogen. Comparative data with both tests are included for normal and pathological urines. Reaction colors with the strip test have been characterized in L* a b* values, an international basis for color designation.

Calibration↗
PubMed1991

Quantitation of urobilinogen in feces, urine, bile and serum by direct spectrophotometry of zinc complex.

Previous methods to quantitate urobilinogen lack precision due to either incomplete reduction of urobilin or to losses of pigment before the use of Ehrlich's aldehyde reaction or due to pigment precipitation, as occurs in Schlesinger's fluorescent assay. The present procedure modifies the latter assay to obviate described problems as it is based on direct spectrophotometry (or spectrofluorometry) of a zinc complex of urobilin in dimethylsulfoxide. The sample is extracted with dimethylsulfoxide to increase recovery of urobilinogen from samples of various origin (feces, urine, bile, serum etc.) and to prevent the precipitation of proteins. After oxidation of urobilinogen with iodine, the concentration of the resulting urobilin is directly determined from the absorption (or fluorescent) spectrum. High sensitivity and high specificity for the procedure result from the high value of absorption coefficient and by the characteristic absorption spectrum of zinc complex of urobilin, respectively. Within-day and day-to-day coefficients of variation of stool and bile samples range from 1.6 to 9.2%. The smallest concentration of urobilinogen measurable by spectrophotometry is approximately 0.5 mumol/l, by fluorometry it is 0.25 mumol/l. The recovery varies from 82.2 to 93.8% depending on re-extraction of the sample. The method is linear in the range of 1 to 35 mumol/l and of 0.5 to 17.5 mumol/l for spectrophotometric and fluorescent determinations, respectively. The results obtained with the present method correlated well with Ehrlich's determination (r2 = 0.912), but are approximately two-fold higher. Storage of the samples at -20 degrees C or extraction with dimethylsulfoxide prior to storage are good ways for sample preservation. Twenty stool samples from healthy adults were determined.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Urobilinogen-i is a major derivative of bilirubin in bile of homozygous Gunn rats.

Gunn rats lack bilirubin UDP-glycosyltransferases, but diazo-negative derivatives of bilirubin have been described in their bile. In order to investigate this alternative disposal of bilirubin, crude bile samples from Gunn and Wistar rats were directly analysed by h.p.l.c. Besides bilirubin (in Gunn rats) or its glycosides (in Wistar rats), two major compounds were detected. A yellow one corresponded to the previously documented vitamin B-2 and was equally prominent in Gunn rats or Wistar-rat bile. The other compound was colourless, but on standing in contact with air it was spontaneously oxidized to a pinkish-yellow pigment. It was far more prominent in Gunn-rat bile. Analysis of bile obtained after intravenous injection of [14C]bilirubin to Gunn rats demonstrated that this compound was highly labelled. Freezing and thawing of the bile resulted in the formation of a series of diazo-negative derivatives, demonstrating that the original compound was quite labile. Spectral (adsorption and fluorescent) and chromatographic (h.p.l.c., t.l.c. and paper chromatography) analysis of the oxidized form of the labelled compound allowed its identification as urobilin-i. The colourless compound secreted in bile was urobilinogen-i. Administration of neomycin and bacitracin to Gunn rats or gut resection suppressed the biliary excretion of urobilinogen and thus confirmed its intestinal origin. Urobilinogen seems thus to represent the major bilirubin derivative present in Gunn-rat bile. Its breakdown products might represent the so-far-unidentified diazo-negative polar bilirubin derivatives. Since only a small amount of bilirubin is present in Gunn-rat bile, the urobilinogen formed in the intestinal lumen seems to be derived from bilirubin reaching the gut via routes other than the biliary one.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Faecal level of urobilinogen: an indication for the risk of superinfection and of failure of oral anticonception?

The influence of clindamycin, dicloxacillin, minocycline and norfloxacin on the faecal concentration of urobilinogen was investigated. The studied drugs were administered orally in standard dosage for six days to groups of six volunteers. A decrease in faecal concentration of urobilinogen following administration of clindamycin (P less than 0.01) and dicloxacillin (P less than 0.05) was found. The possible predictive value of a decrease of the faecal level of urobilinogen as an indicator for the impairment of microbial colonization resistance and for the risk of failure of oral anticonceptive treatment is discussed. It is suggested that clindamycin and dicloxacillin should not be combined with oral anticonceptive treatment unless more specific investigations have excluded interaction of these drugs with the oestrogen metabolism in the bowel.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1987

Accuracy of urine urobilinogen and bilirubin assays in predicting liver function test abnormalities.

Components of the dipstick urinalysis (urine urobilinogen and urine bilirubin) are often used by emergency physicians to screen for the need to obtain liver function tests in many clinical situations. A prospective observational study was conducted to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive properties of spot urine bilirubin and urobilinogen assays in the emergency department as screening test for serum liver function test (LFT) abnormalities. Of 122 patients, abdominal pain was the indication for laboratory evaluation in 54%; jaundice and constitutional symptoms were the indication in 29%. Overall sensitivities for both urine assays were 70% to 74% for serum bilirubin, but 43% to 53% for other LFTs; specificities were 77% to 87% for both urine screens. Positive predictive values show that the urine assays were 83% to 86% reliable for detecting at least one LFT abnormality. Negative predictive values were 85% for both urine assays for serum bilirubin elevations, but lower for other LFTs. Urine urobilinogen has its greatest clinical utility as a screen when a normal/abnormal threshold of 2.0/4.0 mg/dL is used.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Failure of prediction of liver function test abnormalities with the urine urobilinogen and urine bilirubin assays.

A prospective observational study of 229 cases was conducted in a busy ambulatory care setting to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and accuracy of spot urine urobilinogen and urine bilirubin assays as screening tests for serum liver function test (LFT) abnormalities. Both urine tests exhibited remarkably similar characteristics overall once they were adjusted to maximize accuracy and predictive values (occurring at a normal or abnormal "threshold," respectively, of 3.4 or 5.07 mumol/d for urobilinogen and 0 or 1+ for urine bilirubin). The percentage of cases correctly identified were 81% to 83% for serum bilirubin assays, 68% to 72% for other LFTs, but only 62% to 63% for screens for cases with at least one abnormal LFT finding. Poor sensitivities (47% to 49%) limited the detection of abnormal findings by the screen; both screens were reasonably specific (79% to 89%), but negative predictive values were suitable (89%) for serum bilirubin results only and were prohibitively lower (49% to 50%) in predicting all patients without LFT abnormalities. We conclude that spot urine urobilinogen and urine bilirubin determinations, although good screens for isolated serum bilirubin elevations, have unacceptable statistical properties as predictors of other LFT results due to a high proportion of false-negative results.

Bilirubin↗
PubMed1981

Urinary urobilinogen determined by a mercuric chloride procedure.

In this quantitative assay, urinary urobilinogen is oxidized to urobilin with iodate in an acid medium, the pH is adjusted to 6 with sodium acetate, and the mixture is reacted with alcoholic HgCl2 solution, extracted with CHCl3, the measured spectrophotometrically at 513 nm. The artificial standards of previous methods have been replaced with crystalline stercobilin IX (commercially available), a urobilin closely related to the urinary urobilins. The reproducibility of the method, as assessed from 10 replicates of a single urine specimen to which urobilinogen was added, gave a coefficient of variation of 3.9%. Analytical recovery of urobilinogen added to urines was 90.4% (SD 14.5%). Bilirubin, biliverdin, mesobilirubin, coproporphyrin I, uroporphyrin I, and porphobilinogen do not interfere.

Clinical Laboratory Techniques↗
PubMed1979

Some aspects of bile acid and urobilinogen excretion and fecal elimination in men given a rural Guatemalan diet and egg formulas with and without added oat bran.

Six healthy men were fed a formula diet with and without oat bran and a natural food diet typical of rural Guatemala. No significant difference in dye transit time was found between diets but the Guatemalan diet significantly decreased dye retention time and increased stool frequency. Serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels showed no significant differences among dietary treatments. Excretion of fecal bile acids significantly increased on the Guatemalan and oat bran diets, but fecal bile acid concentration was significantly lower only on the Guatemalan diet. Urinary urobilinogen excretion and fecal urobilinogen concentration were significantly lower with the Guatemalan diet.

Adult↗
PubMed1982

[Ehrlich's benzaldehyde reaction (with urobilinogen) 80 years later].

The colour reaction of di-methyl-amido-benzaldehyde with metabolites in urine (especially with urobilinogen), discovered and published by Paul Ehrlich 80 years ago has lost nothing of its significance as a simple, practical, quick, qualitative test. It provides a diagnostic means in liver diseases, hemolytic processes, occlusion of the common bile duct, carcinoid and porphyrinopathies--of course, within the framework of the whole clinical picture. Despite the technical simplicity of the test, certain rules have to be adhered to. Ehrlich's aldehyde reagent has also won importance in chromatography. The modern test-strip technique permits an easy and rapid examination for urobilinogen (and bilirubin).

Benzaldehydes↗
PubMed1988

Abnormalities of urine urobilinogen and urine bilirubin assays and their relation to abnormal results of serum liver function tests.

A prospective observational study of 324 cases was conducted in a busy ambulatory care setting to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and accuracy of spot urine urobilinogen and urine bilirubin assays as screening tests for serum liver function test (LFT) abnormalities. High positive predictive values (88% for at least one abnormal LFT) make the evaluation of positive urine screens detected during routine health care maintenance examinations imperative. Because extraneous factors may influence both urine and serum test results, however, urine assays obtained as a screening parameter in clinical presentations (abdominal pain, jaundice, constitutional symptoms, etc) have only limited clinical utility. The high proportion of false-negative results for both urine assays renders their statistical properties unacceptable as screens in these clinical situations.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1982

Faecal urobilinogen levels and pH of stools in population groups with different incidence of cancer of the colon, and their possible role in its aetiology.

Mean faecal urobilinogen levels and the pH of stools were both found to be higher in subjects from a population group at high risk of developing cancer of the colon than in subjects matched for age, sex and socioeconomic status from a low-risk population group. An alkaline reaction of the colon contents seems to have a tumorigenic effect by a direct action on the mucus of the mucous cells. An acidic reaction, on the other hand, appears to be protective. These differences are dependent on the patterns of diet and manner of eating. Proper mastication of food, roughage, cellulose and vegetable fibre, and short-chain fatty acids of milk and fermented milk products in the diet appear to be protective.

Adult↗