[Prism correction in vision disparity based on the "H. J. Haase measurement and correction methodology"].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Disparity discrimination thresholds are known to increase with both retinal eccentricity and distance from the horopter. However, little is known about how the detectability of cyclopean gratings varies with retinal position. Thresholds for disparity corrugations were measured as a function of corrugation frequency for different visual eccentricities. Subjects viewed annular displays of random dot stereograms, and judged in which of two intervals a circumferential disparity modulation was present. For any given eccentricity, visual sensitivity to disparity corrugations was bandpass. As eccentricity increased from 3.5 to 21.0 degrees, peak-to-trough thresholds were found to increase, the optimal corrugation frequency for detection decreased, and the upper cutoff corrugation frequency also decreased. The M-Scaling functions of Rovamo and Virsu were used to replot the data in terms of cycles per unit cortical distance. Peak detection frequency was constant at 0.8 cycles per mm of cortex after this rescaling, demonstrating that acuity for disparity modulations is approximately M-scaled beyond the fovea.
The past year has seen significant advances in our understanding of the role played by the primary visual cortex (V1) in stereoscopic vision. Recently, the mechanism by which complex cells in V1 respond to random-dot stereograms has been characterized; it appears that their response properties greatly reduce the complexity of one of the critical links for stereopsis, the correspondence problem.
To understand the role that orientation-tuned disparity-sensitive mechanisms play in the perception of stereoscopic depth, we measured stereothresholds using two sets of random-dot stimuli that produce identical stimulation of disparity mechanisms tuned to vertical orientation but dissimilar stimulation of disparity mechanisms tuned to non-vertical orientations. Either 1 or 1.5D of astigmatic blur was simulated in the random-dot images presented to both eyes, using two axis configurations. In the parallel-axis conditions, the axis of simulated astigmatic blur was same in the two eyes (0, 45 or 135 o[rientation]deg). In the orthogonal-axis conditions, the axes of astigmatic blur were orthogonal in the two eyes (LE: 180, RE: 90; LE: 90, RE: 180; LE: 45, RE: 135; and LE: 135, RE: 45). Whereas the stimulation of disparity mechanisms tuned to near-vertical orientations should be similar in the oblique parallel- and orthogonal-axis conditions, the stimulation of non-vertically tuned disparity mechanisms should be dissimilar. Measured stereothresholds were higher in the orthogonal compared to the parallel-axis condition by factors of approximately 2 and 5, for 1 and 1.5D of simulated oblique astigmatic blur, respectively. Further, for comparable magnitudes of simulated astigmatic blur, stereothresholds in the (LE: 180, RE: 90 and LE: 90, RE: 180) conditions were similar to those in the (LE: 45, RE: 135 and LE: 135, RE: 45) conditions. These results suggest that the computation of horizontal disparity includes substantial contributions from disparity mechanisms tuned to non-vertical orientations. Simulations using a modified version of a disparity-energy model [Qian, N., & Zhu, Y. (1997). Physiological computation of binocular disparity. Vision Research, 37, 1811-1827], show (1) that pooling across disparity mechanisms tuned to vertical and non-vertical orientations is required to account for our data and (2) that this pooling can provide the spatial resolution needed to encode spatially changing horizontal disparities.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A fundamental problem in the study of spatial perception concerns whether and how vision might acquire information about the metric structure of surfaces in three-dimensional space from motion and from stereopsis. Theoretical analyses have indicated that stereoscopic perceptions of metric relations in depth require additional information about egocentric viewing distance; and recent experiments by James Todd and his colleagues have indicated that vision acquires only affine but not metric structure from motion--that is, spatial relations ambiguous with regard to scale in depth. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the metric shape of planar stereoscopic forms might be perceived from congruence under planar rotation. In Experiment 1, observers discriminated between similar planar shapes (ellipses) rotating in a plane with varying slant from the frontal-parallel plane. Experimental conditions varied the presence versus absence of binocular disparities, magnification of the disparity scale, and moving versus stationary patterns. Shape discriminations were accurate in all conditions with moving patterns and were near chance in conditions with stationary patterns; neither the presence nor the magnification of binocular disparities had any reliable effect. In Experiment 2, accuracy decreased as the range of rotation decreased from 80 degrees to 10 degrees. In Experiment 3, small deviations from planarity of the motion produced large decrements in accuracy. In contrast with the critical role of motion in shape discrimination, motion hindered discriminations of the binocular disparity scale in Experiment 4. In general, planar motion provides an intrinsic metric scale that is independent of slant in depth and of the scale of binocular disparities. Vision is sensitive to this intrinsic optical metric.
We have investigated how the binocular control of prey capture in the praying mantis is affected by abnormally large vertical disparities, which were introduced by prisms placed in front of the eyes. The position of a target on the two retinae determines both the magnitude of head saccades made to fixate a target and its perceived distance. Over the whole range of vertical disparities tested (up to at least 30 deg), the frequency of fixating saccades is normal while the amplitude of their vertical component is a compromise between the saccades specified by each eye individually. Distance measurements are not affected by imposed vertical disparities. But the larger the vertical disparity, the more reluctant the mantid is to strike at the target until disparities exceed 15 deg when no strikes are elicited at all.
Stereoscopic vision mainly relies on binocular horizontal disparity (HD), and its cortical encoding is well established in the foveal representation of the visual field. The role of vertical disparity (VD) is more controversial. Thus far, in the monkey, very few studies have investigated the HD sensitivity beyond 5 degrees of retinal eccentricity and no evidence of a real encoding of VD exists in the parafoveal representation of areas V1 and V2. Using dynamic random dot stereograms, we have tested both HD and VD selectivities in the parafoveal representation of V1 (calcarine V1) and V2 (eccentricities > 10 degrees ) in a behaving monkey. HD and VD selectivities have been characterized using fitting with Gabor function. A large proportion of the tested cells were both HD and VD selective (47%) and, to a lesser extent, HD selective only (8%) or VD selective only (23%). We found a real encoding of VD, with the same diversity in the tuning profiles as described for HD, that cannot be assimilated to a simple perturbation of the HD matching process. Moreover, the VD encoding had a finer scale than the HD one, which is coherent with the smaller range of naturally occurring VD. For the HD encoding, both the percentage of selective cells and the tuning parameters were close to those reported in foveal V1. These results show that, at parafoveal eccentricities in V1 and V2, disparity detectors are tuned to both horizontal and vertical dimensions of the positional disparity existing between matched features in both retinas.
Dissociated vertical divergence (DVD) is an ocular motor disorder characterized by a slow, upward drift of 1 eye when the other eye is fixating a target. I propose that DVD is a dorsal light reflex in which asymmetrical visual input to the 2 eyes evokes a vertical divergence movement of the eyes. This primitive visuo-vestibular reflex functions as a righting response to restore vertical orientation in lower lateral-eyed animals by equalizing binocular visual input. The dorsal light reflex is suppressed in humans but can manifest as DVD when early-onset strabismus precludes normal binocular development.
BACKGROUND: Dissociated vertical divergence (DVD) has been attributed to a human dorsal light reflex that emerges when single binocular vision is precluded in infancy. If this is the case, then DVD should be associated with a subjective sensation of tilt. METHODS: Prospective examination of 9 patients with DVD and 9 control subjects to determine whether monocular occlusion and alternate occlusion induces a subjective sensation of visual tilt or body tilt. RESULTS: Alternate occlusion disclosed a tilt in the subjective visual vertical in 8 of the 9 patients with DVD and in none of 9 control subjects. On occlusion of the fixating eye, a vertical pencil positioned in the sagittal plane was perceived as instantaneously tilted, with its upper pole tipped toward the side of the covered eye. This visual tilt was quickly followed by a perceived rotation back to vertical, which coincided with the dorsally directed drift of the covered eye. CONCLUSION: In patients with DVD, monocular occlusion is associated with a subjective visual tilt that is annulled by a cyclovertical divergence movement of the eyes. This observation supports the notion that DVD is a human dorsal light reflex, which functions to restore vertical visual orientation when unequal binocular visual input evokes a subjective sensation of visual tilt.
OBJECTIVES: To determine if dimming the light to 1 eye affects baseball hitting (motion-in-depth) and if binocular interaction influences the ability to hit a baseball. METHODS: The ability to hit baseballs in a batting cage was measured under conditions of (1) no filter before either eye, (2) neutral density filters before both eyes, and (3) a neutral density filter before 1 eye, while viewing with both eyes. Batting scores were based on the number of hits, fouls, and misses. RESULTS: A neutral density filter of 0.6 optical density before both eyes had no significant effect on batting ability compared with no filter (87% vs 94%). While viewing binocularly, a filter before 1 eye caused a significantly greater reduction in hitting scores than when the filter was placed before the opposite eye (36% vs 80%). This greater effect of 1 eye on hitting scores denotes an ocular preference or dominance within the motion stereopsis system. The eye associated with the greater reduction in hitting ability when dimmed by a filter was termed the dominant eye for motion stereopsis. In comparison with placing 0.6-optical density filters before both eyes, the same filter before the dominant eye reduced hitting ability (36% vs 87%), but when the filter was placed before the nondominant eye, the hitting ability was not significantly reduced (80% vs 87%). The batting scores decreased as filter densities increased from 0.3- to 0.6-optical density, and the effect was significantly more for the dominant eye than for the nondominant eye. CONCLUSIONS: Binocular vision contributes to the precise localization of a pitched baseball, and one eye influences baseball hitting more than the other eye. The motion-in-depth channel (baseball hitting) shares a sensitivity to unequal binocular illumination with the sideways-motion channel (Pulfrich phenomenon). The timing of the impulses conducted from the eyes appears to be critical for the precise localization of objects processed by either the motion-in-depth (baseball hitting) or the sideways-motion (Pulfrich phenomenon) channels.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Studies of vision have informed theories first in philosophy and then in psychology. Over the centuries, an increasing number of phenomena have been enlisted to refute or reinforce particular theories. Nowhere has this been more evident than in binocular vision. How we see a single world with two eyes is one of the oldest and most consistently studied topics in vision research. It has been discussed at least since the time of Aristotle and it has been examined experimentally since the second century, when Ptolemy defined lines of visual correspondence for the two eyes. Prior to Wheatstone's invention of the stereoscope in the 1830s, binocular vision had been studied in terms of visual directions. The stereoscope established distance (or depth) as well as direction as dimensions of binocular vision. Subsequently, depth rather than direction has been the principal concern of students of vision, and texts in English devoted to analyses of direction rather than depth have been neglected. We examine the experiments on binocular visual direction conducted by Wells before Wheatstone, and by Towne and LeConte after him, and discuss the reasons for their neglect.
Many theories of human stereovision are based on feature matching and the related correspondence problem. In this paper, we present psychophysical experiments indicating that localized image features such as Laplacian zerocrossings, intensity extrema, or centroids are not necessary for binocular depth perception. Smooth one-dimensional intensity profiles were combined into stereograms with mirror-symmetric half-images such that these localized image features were either absent or did not carry stereo information. In a discrimination task, subjects were asked to distinguish between stereograms differing only by an exchange of these half-images (ortho- vs. pseudoscopic stereograms). In a depth ordering task, subjects had to judge which of the two versions appeared in front. Subjects are able to solve both tasks even in the absence of the mentioned image features. The performance is compared to various possible stereo mechanisms. We conclude that localized image features and the correspondences between them are not necessary to perceive stereoscopic depth. One mechanism accounting for our data is correlation or mean square difference.
In our study we examined the influence of existing retinal correspondence on the result of squint operations for alternating convergent strabism. 157 patients under 10 years of age at the time of their first or only operation were included. They were divided into groups, depending on their age at the onset of squint and subgroups according to their type of retinal correspondence. The development of distance and near deviation was investigated separately. Covariance analysis demonstrated that the preoperative sensorial state is a predictor for the motor outcome of surgery with regard to postoperative distance deviation. Statistically we found at least noticeable results (p < 0.15) in all groups of patients--for acquired esotropia a significant result (p < 0.01). With regard to the postoperative near deviation we found a significant influence of the preoperative sensorial state only in the group of patients with a late onset of squint (p = 0.05). For patients with an earlier onset (before the 30th month) of strabismus, the preoperative angle of near deviation proved to have a significant impact on the postoperative development of near deviation (p < 0.05). Sensorio-motorial adaptational phenomena in esotropia are presumed to be the major cause for this difference.
We measured the gain and phase of vertical vergence in response to disjunctive vertical oscillations of dichoptic textured displays. The texture elements were m-scaled to equate visibility over the area of the display and were aperiodic and varied in shape so as to avoid spurious binocular matches. The display subtended 65 degrees and oscillated through peak-to-peak amplitudes from 18 arc min to 4 degrees at frequencies from 0.05 to 2 Hz - larger ranges than used in previous investigations. The gain of vergence was near 1 when the stimulus oscillated at 18 arc min at a frequency of 0.1 Hz or less. As the amplitude of stimulus oscillation increased from 18 arc min to 4 degrees, vergence gain decreased at all frequencies, which is evidence of a nonlinearity. Gain declined with increasing stimulus frequency but was still about 0.5 at 2 Hz for an amplitude of 18 arc min. Phase lag increased from less than 10 degrees at a stimulus frequency of 0.05 Hz to between 100 degrees and 145 degrees at 2 Hz. Overall, the dynamics of vertical vergence resemble the dynamics of horizontal vergence and cyclovergence.
RATIONALE: During binocular rivalry, two incompatible images are presented to each eye and these monocular stimuli compete for perceptual dominance, with one pattern temporarily suppressed from awareness. One variant of stimulus presentation in binocular rivalry experiments is dichoptic stimulus alternation (DSA), when stimuli are applied to the eyes in rapid reversals. There is preliminary report that in contrast with healthy controls, schizophrenic patients can maintain binocular rivalry even at very high DSA rates. OBJECTIVE: The study was undertaken to investigate whether binocular rivalry survives high rates of DSA induced by the South American hallucinogenic beverage ayahuasca. METHODS: Ten individuals who were participating in ayahuasca ceremonials were requested to volunteer for binocular rivalry tests (DSA=0, 3.75, 7.5, 15 and 30 Hz) without and after drinking the brew. RESULTS: Ingestion of ayahuasca increased mean dominance periods both in standard binocular rivalry conditions (no DSA) and tests with DSA. At higher DSA rates (15 and 30 Hz) the total length of dominance periods was longer on the brew. CONCLUSION: It is discussed that ayahuasca-induced survival of binocular rivalry at high DSA rates may be related to slow visual processing and increased mean dominance periods may result from hallucinogen-induced alteration of gamma oscillations in the visual pathways.