PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Walkergate Hospital”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Resistance of the human posterior lens capsule and zonules to disruption.

PURPOSE: To determine the resistance of the human posterior lens capsule and zonules to disruption during cataract surgery. SETTING: Wet lab at Walkergate Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, England. METHOD: Human donor eyes were obtained after removal of a corneoscleral disc. Lens extraction was performed by an extracapsular technique leaving an intact capsular bag. The resistance of the zonules and posterior capsule to disruption by aspiration was measured in each eye, and the resistance of the zonules to damage from direct mechanical stretch was determined. RESULTS: Posterior capsules tolerated a median suction pressure of 200 mm Hg (range 150 to 300 mm Hg) before disruption. Values for female eyes were slightly greater than for male; no significant correlation with age was shown. The zonular fibers tolerated a median suction pressure of 200 mm Hg (range 150 to 300 mm Hg). The median mechanical zonular stretch tolerance was 3.00 mm (range 2.75 to 4.00 mm). No significant correlation was found between zonular suction tolerance or stretch tolerance and sex or between suction tolerance and age, but a negative relationship was noted between maximum tolerated stretch and age. CONCLUSION: Setting the maximum aspiration pressure during irrigation/aspiration to 150 mm Hg should help prevent capsular or zonular rupture. If more powerful aspiration is required, it should be used with great care so as not to engage the capsule.

Adolescent↗

The ethics of resource allocation: a case study.

The paper analyses the factors involved in a series of decisions by the Newcastle Area Health Authority concerning the future of one of its hospitals, as an illustration of the way in which choices about priorities in the health service are actually made. There is no easy way to resolve the various conflicts of interest, notably in this case the competing demands of acute and chronic medicine. Difficult decisions are made more difficult, however, by the over-rigid division of medicine into compartments, by mistrust between the medical profession and administrators, and by the inordinately long time-scale of the decision-making process. It is suggested that there might be value in acknowledging explicitly that occasional examples of 'heroic medicine' must not be allowed too much influence in shaping public expectations. The paper results from the deliberations of a working group on current medical-ethical problems, set up under the auspices of the Northern Regional Health Authority (I).

Decision Making↗