SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “alteplase”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Trade-Off Between Early Reperfusion and First-Pass Effect With Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase Before Stroke Thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND: Early reperfusion and first-pass effect are key procedural end points in large-vessel occlusion stroke thrombectomy. Because of greater fibrin specificity, tenecteplase may achieve higher early reperfusion rates compared with alteplase, yet impact of thrombolytic agents on first-pass effect remains unclear. METHODS: Consecutive patients with anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion stroke receiving intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular treatment at 2 US stroke centers were reviewed. Early reperfusion was defined as extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction ≥2b50 on initial angiography. First-pass effect was defined as extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2c-3 after a single pass. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of early reperfusion and first-pass effect. Ordinal logistic regression assessed associations of thrombolytic agent, early reperfusion, and first-pass effect with 90-day modified Rankin Scale shift. RESULTS: Among 299 patients (tenecteplase 201, alteplase 98), early reperfusion occurred in 60 (20.1%) and was more frequent with tenecteplase compared with alteplase (24.4% versus 11.2%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.31 [95% CI, 1.07-4.98]). Patients without early reperfusion were evaluated for first-pass effect. Of 237 patients, first-pass effect was less frequent with tenecteplase compared with alteplase (30.3% versus 40.2%; adjusted OR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.23-0.79]). Early reperfusion and first-pass effect each independently predicted better functional outcome, but functional outcomes were similar between tenecteplase and alteplase overall. CONCLUSIONS: We observed higher early reperfusion rates with tenecteplase, but greater first-pass effect with alteplase, while functional outcomes were comparable. This may suggest that the early reperfusion advantage of tenecteplase could be offset by downstream procedural variables such as first-pass effect, highlighting the importance of jointly evaluating both reperfusion and procedural efficiency when comparing thrombolytic strategies.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Early Reperfusion in Basilar Artery Occlusion Stroke Managed With Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase Before Endovascular Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Timely reperfusion is a critical determinant of favorable outcomes in basilar artery occlusion (BAO) stroke. We aimed to examine whether the choice of thrombolytic agent predicts early reperfusion (ER) in BAO stroke managed with tenecteplase versus alteplase before endovascular treatment. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter US cohort of consecutive patients with BAO from 14 stroke centers treated with tenecteplase or alteplase within 4.5 hours of last known well before endovascular treatment. The primary end point was ER, defined as angiographic ER (expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade 2b to 3 on the first diagnostic angiogram), or clinical ER, defined as substantial neurological improvement precluding endovascular treatment and a good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-3). RESULTS: Among 163 patients with BAO and a median last known well-to-needle time of 135 minutes (interquartile range, 100-193) and last known well-to-puncture time of 228 minutes (interquartile range, 166-307), ER was observed in 27 (16.6%) patients. Rates of ER were comparable between tenecteplase (14/75, 18.7%) and alteplase (13/88, 14.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.082 [95% CI, 0.444-2.631]; P=0.862). In addition, rates of angiographic ER and clinical ER subgroups did not differ between thrombolytic agents. Higher Basilar Artery on Computed Tomography Angiography scores and a nonatherothrombotic cause independently predicted ER. In multivariable analysis, a good functional outcome was associated with younger age, lower stroke burden, and shorter last known well-to-puncture time. CONCLUSIONS: In BAO treated within 4.5 hours of last known well, tenecteplase and alteplase produced comparable early reperfusion rates. Achieving ER did not modify the association between thrombolytic agent and good functional outcome, consistent with rapid thrombectomy in patients with no ER.

basilar artery↗

PubMed2026

Extending the Treatment Window for Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is the standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of onset. However, imaging-based selection may extend the treatment window. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of IVT administered beyond 4.5 hours after stroke onset or last known well (LKW) in patients selected based on imaging findings. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was performed to identify randomized controlled trials comparing IVT with alteplase or tenecteplase (TNK) administered >4.5 hours after stroke onset/LKW vs standard care. Primary outcomes were 3-month excellent (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-1) functional outcome and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Secondary outcomes included good (mRS 0-2) functional outcome, recanalization, and 3-month mortality. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Subgroup analysis assessed differences between alteplase and TNK. RESULTS: Fourteen studies involving 4,944 patients were included. The mean age was 69.8 years, 58.2% were male, the median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 9, and 12.3% received preplanned endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). A total of 2,492 patients received IVT in an extended time window (4.5-24 hours). Compared with standard care, extended IVT was associated with higher odds of achieving an excellent functional outcome (OR: 1.43 [95% CI 1.25-1.63]), a good functional outcome (OR: 1.25 [95% CI 1.11-1.40]), and recanalization (OR: 3.28 [95% CI 2.09-5.16]). There was no difference in 3-month mortality (OR: 1.21 [95% CI 0.95-1.53]). However, IVT increased the risk of sICH (OR: 2.51 [95% CI 1.47-4.28]). Sensitivity analysis excluding patients who received EVT showed no impact on the outcomes. TNK exhibited similar efficacy to alteplase but showed potentially lower odds of sICH (OR: 1.96, 95% CI 1.06-3.64) compared with alteplase (OR: 5.29, 95% CI 1.80-15.57); however, the subgroup difference was not significant (p = 0.11). DISCUSSION: Among patients selected based on imaging, 4.5-24 hours after stroke onset/LKW, IVT improves outcomes despite an increased risk of sICH. TNK showed similar efficacy to alteplase, with a possible lower risk of sICH; however, direct comparisons in future trials are needed.

Humans↗