PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “anisogamy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

The evolution of anisogamy: the adaptive significance of damage, repair and mortality.

Classic theory on the evolution of anisogamy focuses on the trade-off between gamete productivity and provisioning and mechanisms associated with post-zygotic survival. In this article, the role of mortality acting on both zygotes and gametes is explored as a factor influencing the evolution of different sized gametes. In particular, variable mortality through differential survival or metabolic damage is shown to affect the persistence of isogamy, the evolution of more than two sexes and the evolution of anisogamy. Evolutionary stable isogamous states are shown to be locally unstable and disruptive selection can induce the evolution of anisogamy. Analysis of both the isogamous and anisogamous ESS points reveals that the persistence of either of these conditions is not always assured. The implications of variable survival on the evolution of anisogamy are discussed.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

The evolution of anisogamy: a game-theoretic approach.

A popular theory has proposed that anisogamy originated through disruptive selection acting on an ancestral isogamous population, though recent work has emphasized the importance of other factors in its evolution. We re-examine the disruptive selection theory, starting from an isogamous population with two mating types and taking into account the functional relationship, g(m), between the fitness of a gamete and its size, m, as well as the relationship, f(S), between the fitness of a zygote and its size, S. Evolutionary game theory is used to determine the existence and continuous stability of isogamous and anisogamous strategies for the two mating types under various models for the two functions g(m) and f(S). In the ancestral unicellular state, these two functions are likely to have been similar; this leads to isogamy whether they are sigmoidal or concave, though in the latter case allowance must be made for a minimal gamete size. The development of multicellularity may leave g(m) relatively unchanged while f(S) moves to the right, leading to the evolution of anisogamy. Thus, the disruptive selection theory provides a powerful explanation of the origin of anisogamy, though other selective forces may have been involved in the subsequent specialization of micro- and macrogametes.

Animals↗

Selection for high gamete encounter rates explains the evolution of anisogamy using plausible assumptions about size relationships of swimming speed and duration.

A previous general model describing physical constraints on gamete encounter rates was modified to incorporate assumptions that increased size causes decreased swimming speed and increased fertile period (or other proportional enhancement to gamete fertility). The analysis indicates that with moderately strong size dependence of fertile period and a range of speed dependencies, selection for high encounter rates pressures mating systems that develop any heritable difference in size between the gametes of different mating types to exaggerate the difference and evolve from isogamy to anisogamy. The smaller gamete has an optimal size, but the larger faces continuing selection for increased size. This continues to a size that is estimated to be sufficient to make pheromone production of sperm attractants practical. This mechanism then bridges the missing link between isogametes and oogamy in a previous analysis of the effectiveness of pheromones in explaining the success of male-female mating systems. The evolution and success of anisogamy and oogamy can be explained solely on the basis of physical effects on the encounter process.

Animals↗

Parasite diversity and the evolution of diploidy, multicellularity and anisogamy.

It may be reasonably assumed that a diversity of parasite genotypes in any one cell or organism is more harmful than a population of uniform genotypes. If this is accepted the following consequences follow: (i) Parasite mixing, due to cytoplasm mixing, at the time of zygote formation is a new and additional cost of sex. The rapid divisions typical of zygotic cleavage may be viewed as an adaptation to minimize the degree of mixing of parasites in each daughter cell. The faster the divisions the less chance parasite populations have to grow and mix. Mitosis is the fastest form of cell division. Prolongation of the diploid phase follows as a consequence of mitosis in a diploid zygote. This view is unusual in that it demands no advantage per se to the possession of two chromosome sets. (ii) The cells of the blastula formed from rapid zygotic divisions are different as regards their symbiotic inclusions. If the right to gametogenesis is restricted, then every replicator symbiont and nuclear genome alike and hence every cell of the developing embryo, will have an incentive to compete. Selection between the clonal blastula cells would result in the cells of low parasite diversity forming the gametes. Thus, germ line restriction is in the interests of the nuclear genome. Controlling the right to gametogenesis is only possible if the blastula remains intact. Hence, multicellularity might have evolved so as to enable the limitation of the right to gametogenesis and hence reduce the parasite diversity of gametes. Inter-cell competition during embryogenesis is central to Buss's seminal notion of the evolution of developmental complexity within the metazoa. The above theory provides the missing motive force behind such competition. (iii) For a given zygote size, the fittest zygotes are those produced by the gametes most disparate in size because these have a lower diversity of parasites. This may be the advantage of anisogamy. The novelty of this new view of anisogamy is that it puts a premium on sperm being very small, in order to exclude parasites from sperm cytoplasm. The hypothesis is briefly tested by examining if there are alternative means of parasite limitation in organisms with large gametes.

Animals↗

Search, encounter rates, and the evolution of anisogamy.

We describe analytical and numerical models to study gamete encounters in two and three dimensions between differently sized gametes without assuming pre-existing mating types. Our results indicate that an isogamous population can be successfully invaded by a gametangium if it produces gametes of a different size. The existence of a low adaptive peak for isogamy and a much higher adaptive peak for anisogamy suggests that stochastic forces may be initially important in driving isogamy through the fitness saddle to anisogamy.

Animals↗

A comparative test of a theory for the evolution of anisogamy.

Why are sperm small and eggs large? The dominant explanation for the evolution of gamete size dimorphism envisages two opposing selection pressures acting on gamete size: small gametes are favoured because many can be produced, whereas large gametes contribute to a large zygote with consequently increased survival chances. This model predicts disruptive selection on gamete size (i.e. selection for anisogamy) if increases in zygote size confer disproportional increases in fitness (at least over part of its size range). It therefore predicts that increases in adult size should be accompanied by stronger selection for anisogamy. Using data from the green algal order Volvocales, we provide the first phylogenetically controlled test of the model's predictions using a published phylogeny and a new phylogeny derived by a different method. The predictions that larger organisms should (i) have a greater degree of gamete dimorphism and (ii) have larger eggs are broadly upheld. However, the results are highly sensitive to the phylogeny and the mode of analysis used.

Animals↗

Intensity of sexual selection along the anisogamy-isogamy continuum.

Research into the evolution of giant sperm has uncovered a paradox within the foundations of sexual selection theory. Postcopulatory sexual selection on males (that is, sperm competition and cryptic female choice) can lead to decreased sperm numbers by favouring the production of larger sperm. However, a decline in sperm numbers is predicted to weaken selection on males and increase selection on females. As isogamy is approached (that is, as investment per gamete by males approaches that by females), sperm become less abundant, ova become relatively less rare, and competition between males for fertilization success is predicted to weaken. Sexual selection for longer sperm, therefore, is expected to be self limiting. Here we examine this paradox in Drosophila along the anisogamy-isogamy continuum using intraspecific experimental evolution techniques and interspecific comparative techniques. Our results confirm the big-sperm paradox by showing that the sex difference in sexual selection gradients decreases as sperm size increases. However, a resolution to the paradox is provided when this finding is interpreted in concert with the 'opportunity for selection' and the 'opportunity for sexual selection'. Furthermore, we show that most of the variation in measures of selection intensity is explained by sperm length and relative investment in sperm production.

Animals↗

Positive selection and relaxed purifying selection contribute to rapid evolution of sex-biased genes in green seaweed Ulva.

BACKGROUND: The evolution of differences in gamete size and number between sexes is a cornerstone of sexual selection theories. The green macroalga Ulva, with incipient anisogamy and parthenogenetic gametes, provides a unique system to investigate theoretical predictions regarding the evolutionary pressures that drive the transition from isogamy to anisogamy, particularly in relation to gamete size differentiation and sexual selection. Its minimal gamete dimorphism and facultative parthenogenesis enable a rare window into early evolutionary steps toward anisogamy. RESULTS: By analyzing the expression profiles of sex-biased genes (SBGs) during gametogenesis, we found that SBGs evolve faster than unbiased genes, driven by higher rates of non-synonymous substitution (dN), indicating that SBGs are under stronger selective pressures. Mating type minus-biased genes (mt-BGs) exhibit higher dN/dS values than mating type plus-biased genes (mt+BGs), suggesting stronger selective pressures on mt-BGs, although this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.08). Using branch-site and RELAX models, we found positive selection and relaxed purifying selection acting on a significant proportion of SBGs, particularly those associated with flagella function. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the selective pressures shaping anisogamy and provides insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying its evolution. The faster evolution of SBGs, particularly mt-BGs, and the positive selection on genes associated with motility, such as those related to flagella function, suggest the importance of enhanced gamete motility in the transition to anisogamy. These findings contribute to our understanding of sexual selection and the evolutionary forces that drive the differentiation of gamete size and number between sexes.

Selection, Genetic↗

The evolution of sexes.

It is very likely that sexual differentiation into two morphologically indistinguishable mating types has preceded the evolution of anisogamy. Therefore, the study of the evolution of mating types in an isogamous population is more informative for understanding the forces responsible for the evolution of different sexes than the study of the evolution of anisogamy; the latter represents the secondary problem of how, after the establishment of two sexes, an increasing degree of gamete dimorphism may evolve. Mating type evolution has been analyzed theoretically in population genetic models. These explorations show that mating types may evolve as a consequence of selection for more efficient gamete recognition, and also as a result of intragenomic conflict between nuclear and cytoplasmic DNA. However, in both cases the selection forces have to be very strong, which makes these possible explanations less convincing. Nearly all theories proposed for the evolution of anisogamy assume two conflicting selection forces to be relevant: selection for greater gamete productivity, and selection for greater zygote size. Although the explanation is intuitively plausible, the comparative evidence is a bit disappointing. Alternatively, anisogamy can be explained as a side-effect of selection for a greater efficiency in finding a mating partner by using sexual pheromones. Firm empirical evidence is lacking, however. In both problem areas--mating type evolution and anisogamy evolution--experimental work is badly needed.

Animals↗

The twofold cost of sex reconsidered: meiotic mechanisms protect anisogamous populations from invasion by thelytoky.

Most multicellular animals practice anisogamy (fertilization between eggs and sperm). When mothers produce sons and daughters at a 1:1 ratio, the "twofold cost of males" arises because males do not directly contribute to population growth. If thelytokous parthenogens producing only daughters invade a population, they should spread rapidly. Although thelytoky has repeatedly evolved across invertebrate and vertebrate taxa, it remains a minority. Why? The evolutionary transition from anisogamy to thelytoky requires eggs to initiate embryonic development without fertilization. However, in metazoan animals, meiotic metaphase (MM) arrest halts oogenesis midway and normally resumes only after stimulation by sperm penetration. Empirical and experimental evidences indicate that release of MM arrest without fertilization is extremely difficult, providing a strong mechanistic barrier against parthenogenesis. Even if MM arrest were released, oogenesis would proceed to produce either a haploid embryo or a diploid embryo through refusion with the second polar body (terminal fusion automixis). Outbred species typically accumulate more than one lethal equivalent of recessive deleterious alleles per genome as heterozygotes. Upon transition to haploid or automictic development, these recessive lethals normally masked in outbred diploids would be exposed simultaneously, causing embryonic death and creating the next barrier. Thus, thelytoky cannot be achieved simply by modification of the existing meiotic system; instead, other mechanisms, such as apomixis, that bypass meiosis are required. Mathematical models and simulations support this "meiotic constraint" hypothesis. Combined with recently proposed immediate benefits of anisogamy and traditional genetic benefits (e.g., Red Queen), it may largely explain the maintenance of costly anisogamy.

Animals↗

Population genetic aspects of deleterious cytoplasmic genomes and their effect on the evolution of sexual reproduction.

A conflict of interest may arise between intra-cellular genomes and their host cell. The example explicitly investigated is that of a 'selfish' mitochondrion which increases its own rate of replication at the cost of reduced metabolic activity which is deleterious to the host cell. The results apply to deleterious cytoplasmic agents in general, such as intracellular parasites. Numerical simulation suggests that selfish mitochondria are able to invade an isogamous sexual population and are capable of reducing its fitness to below 5% of that prior to their invasion. Their spread is enhanced by decreasing the number of mitotic divisions between meioses, and this may constitute a significant constraint on the evolution of lifecycles. The presence of such deleterious cytoplasmic agents favours a nuclear mutation whose expression prevents cytoplasm from the other gamete entering the zygote at fertilization, resulting in uniparental inheritance of cytoplasm. Such a mutation appears physiologically plausible and can increase in frequency despite its deleterious effect in halving the amount of cytoplasm in the zygote. It is suggested that these were the conditions under which anisogamy evolved. These results have implications for the evolution of sexual reproduction. Standard theory suggests there is no immediate cost of sex, a twofold cost being incurred later as anisogamy evolves. The analysis described here predicts a large, rapid reduction in fitness associated with isogamous sexual reproduction, due to the spread of deleterious cytoplasmic agents with fitness only subsequently rising to a maximum twofold cost as uniparental inheritance of cytoplasm and anisogamy evolve.

Animals↗

The cost of sex.

The potential costs of sex can be divided into two large categories. The first category consists of costs that are not derived from anisogamy, and includes costs associated with recombination, with delay of synthesis at the cellular level (cellular-mechanical cost), and with fertilization. The second large category of costs is derived from anisogamy. Specific costs include the cost of genome dilution (cost of males) and the cost of sexual selection. The cost of genome dilution applies to sexual females in anisogamous organisms because the female provides cytoplasm and reserve materials to support the male genome as well as her own genome. The cost of sexual selection is caused by loss of fitness through selection resulting from sexual competition, or through dual phenotypic specialization of a single species as a result of sexual selection. All factors contributing to the cost of sex apply potentially to a broad spectrum of organisms. However, numerous mechanisms reduce the realized cost of sex to a level far below the potential cost. The potential cost is likely to be highest in small organisms, but the realized cost among these organisms is reduced greatly by intermittent sexuality. The realized cost of sex tends to increase with size and complexity among organisms because of increasing commitment to sex with increasing size. Increasing commitment to sex is required by the lower reproductive rates and consequently lower rates of adaptation in larger organisms, which would put such organisms at a disadvantage in relation to smaller organisms were it not for increasing commitment to sexual recombination in larger organisms. Comparable commitment to sex is not possible in smaller organisms because such organisms have a higher potential cost of sex, which maintains among them a lower limit on the frequency of sex.

Animals↗

Sexual selection and the maintenance of sexual reproduction.

The maintenance of sexual reproduction is a problem in evolutionary theory because, all else being equal, asexual populations have a twofold fitness advantage over their sexual counterparts and should rapidly outnumber a sexual population because every individual has the potential to reproduce. The twofold cost of sex exists because of anisogamy or gamete dimorphism-egg-producing females make a larger contribution to the zygote compared with the small contribution made by the sperm of males, but both males and females contribute 50% of the genes. Anisogamy also generates the conditions for sexual selection, a powerful evolutionary force that does not exist in asexual populations. The continued prevalence of sexual reproduction indicates that the 'all else being equal' assumption is incorrect. Here I show that sexual selection can mitigate or even eliminate the cost of sex. If sexual selection causes deleterious mutations to be more deleterious in males than females, then deleterious mutations are maintained at lower equilibrium frequency in sexual populations relative to asexual populations. The fitness of sexual females is higher than asexuals because there is no difference in the fecundity of sexual females and asexuals of the same genotype, but the equilibrium frequency of deleterious mutations is lower in sexual populations. The results are not altered by synergistic epistasis in males.

Animals↗