SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “ascites”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

Diagnosing ascites: value of ascitic fluid total protein, albumin, cholesterol, their ratios, serum-ascites albumin and cholesterol gradient.

Ascitic fluid total protein, albumin, cholesterol, their ascites/serum ratios, serum-ascites albumin and cholesterol gradients were measured for their ability to differentiate cirrhotic, malignant and tuberculous ascites in 76 patients. The mean +/- s.d. ascitic fluid total protein, albumin, cholesterol, their respective ascitic fluid/serum ratios in cirrhotic ascites were lower than malignant and tuberculous groups (P < 0.001 for each). The difference between malignant and tuberculous groups was significant for ascitic fluid/serum total protein (P < 0.05) and ascitic fluid/serum albumin (P < 0.01) only. Mean serum-ascites albumin gradient in cirrhotics was higher than in the malignant and tuberculous groups (P < 0.001 for each). The difference between malignant and tuberculous groups was significant (P < 0.01). Mean +/- s.d. serum-ascites cholesterol gradient in cirrhotics was higher than that in malignant and tuberculous groups (P < 0.001 for each). The difference between malignant and tuberculous groups was also significant (P < 0.01). Both serum/ascitic fluid total protein less than 0.5 and ascitic fluid cholesterol less than 55 mg/dL had 94% diagnostic accuracy for differentiating cirrhotic from malignant and tuberculous differentiating cirrhotic from malignant and tuberculous ascites. Serum ascitic fluid albumin gradient greater than 1.1 g/dL, ascitic fluid/serum albumin less than 0.65 and ascitic fluid albumin less than 2 g/dL had diagnostic accuracy of 92, 92 and 91%, respectively. Ascitic fluid total protein had diagnostic accuracy of 88%. None of the tests was able to differentiate between malignant and tuberculous ascites. Measurement of ascitic fluid cholesterol concentration is a simple method of differentiating cirrhotic from non-cirrhotic ascites.

Albumins↗

PubMed1984

Superiority of the serum-ascites albumin difference over the ascites total protein concentration in separation of "transudative" and "exudative" ascites.

The serum-ascites albumin difference, an index of the serum-ascites oncotic pressure difference, correlates directly with the pressure gradient between the portal capillaries and the peritoneal cavity. This test was compared with the ascites total protein concentration in the separation of "transudative" and "exudative" ascites. The serum-ascites albumin difference was large in patients with transudative ascites (1.6 +/- 0.5 g/dl) and small in patients with exudative ascites (0.6 +/- 0.4 g/dl, p less than 0.001) and provided significantly better discrimination of these categories than did the ascites total protein concentration. The serum-ascites albumin difference was especially useful in the separation of cardiac ascites, which usually has a high total protein concentration, from high protein exudative ascites. The serum-ascites albumin difference did not provide perfect discrimination of any category, however; in patients with mixed causes of ascites, this difference tended to be large, resembling ordinary transudative ascites, a potential source of diagnostic error. Nevertheless, the serum-ascites albumin difference has superior discriminatory power and should replace the ascites total protein concentration in the routine diagnostic examination of ascites.

Ascites↗

PubMed1988

Diagnosis of malignant ascites. Comparison of ascitic fibronectin, cholesterol, and serum-ascites albumin difference.

The ascitic fluid concentrations of cholesterol and fibronectin and the serum-ascites albumin difference were compared with two conventional tests of ascitic fluid, total protein and LDH, in their diagnostic ability for detection of malignancy in ascitic samples from 69 patients with ascites: 54 with ascites due to liver disease and 15 whose ascites was caused by peritoneal metastases. Sixteen cirrhotic patients with superimposed hepatocellular carcinoma in whom ascites was of uncertain etiology were considered separately. The mean ascitic fluid total protein, LDH, cholesterol, and fibronectin values in the peritoneal metastases group were 3.70 +/- 1.20 g/dl, 247.26 +/- 148.14 units/liter, 109.06 +/- 29.85 mg/dl, and 91.57 +/- 41.52 micrograms/ml, respectively, and all were significantly higher than the corresponding values in the liver disease group (P less than 0.001), which were 1.37 +/- 0.59 g/dl, 75.40 +/- 110.70 units/liter, 23.75 +/- 11.22 mg/dl, and 31.86 +/- 10.51 micrograms/ml, respectively. Mean serum-ascites albumin difference in the peritoneal metastases group was 0.62 +/- 0.38 g/dl, which was significantly different from the corresponding value in the liver disease group (1.92 +/- 0.41 g/dl, P less than 0.001). Both ascitic cholesterol above 46 mg/dl and an ascitic fibronectin concentration greater than 50 micrograms/ml had high diagnostic accuracy (97%) for malignancy, being higher than that achieved using a serum-ascites albumin difference under 1.1 g/dl and an ascitic total protein above 2.5 g/dl, which had accuracies of 94% and 93%, respectively. Ascitic fluid LDH was the least reliable test. No differences in the ascitic fluid analysis were found between cirrhotic patients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ascites↗

PubMed1992

Serum-ascites albumin concentration gradient and ascites fibronectin in the diagnosis of malignant ascites.

BACKGROUND: The differential diagnosis between malignant and nonmalignant ascites by using laboratory parameters has not been completely achieved so far. METHODS: The authors studied serum-ascites albumin concentration gradients ([albumin]s - [albumin]a), ascites fibronectin and various parameters in 149 consecutive patients with ascites (including Group 1: 22 patients with intraabdominal malignant lesions; Group 2: 81 patients with chronic liver disease; and Group 3: 46 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC]). RESULTS: The concentrations of fibronectin, albumin, protein, lactate dehydrogenase, and carcinoembryonic antigen in ascites were significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (P < 0.001). By contrast, the [albumin]s - [albumin]a was significantly lower in Group 1 than in Group 2 (P < 0.001). None of these parameters was useful in differentiating the ascites of chronic liver disease from that of HCC. In this study, to differentiate malignant ascites from the ascites caused by liver diseases, [albumin]s - [albumin]a (< 1.5 g/dl) and the fibronectin level in the ascites (> 100 micrograms/ml) provided diagnostic accuracy (96.8% and 95.9%, respectively) as precise as those of the levels of albumin (> 1.6 g/dl), protein (> 2.5 g/dl), and lactate dehydrogenase (> 60 U/l; 97.9%, 96.7%, and 94.8%, respectively) in ascites. These results were better than that of carcinoembryonic antigen level (> 1.5 ng/ml, 80.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The authors concluded that [albumin]s - [albumin]a offered the best method to survey malignant ascites because of its sensitivity (100%).

Albumins↗

PubMed1994

Total discrimination of peritoneal malignant ascites from cirrhosis- and hepatocarcinoma-associated ascites by assays of ascitic cholesterol and lactate dehydrogenase.

No laboratory test completely distinguishes malignant ascites (MA) from ascites associated with cirrhosis and (or) hepatocellular carcinoma (A/C-HC). Ascitic cytology is highly specific but has a diagnostic sensitivity of only 40-60%. We determined 11 ascitic analytes and cytology in 58 patients with cirrhosis, 15 with hepatocellular carcinoma, and 21 with MA (10 ovarian cancers, 4 mesotheliomas, 6 gastrointestinal neoplasias, 1 leukemia). Ascitic total protein, cholesterol, pseudouridine, and lactate dehydrogenase (LD), and the ascitic:serum ratios of total protein and of LD showed the most significant differences between the two groups of patients. Stepwise multiple linear discriminant analysis (applying the Wilks' lambda criterion) of several variables, corroborated by the "jack-knife" reallocation procedure, showed that the ascitic cholesterol and ascitic LD association correctly identified 100% of MA and A/C-HC; cytology had a diagnostic specificity of 100%, but identified only 48% of MA. This association may represent a primary tool for the discrimination of ascites of unknown origin, particularly in the presence of negative cytology findings.

Ascites↗

PubMed1992

Pathophysiology of elevated ascites fluid cholesterol in malignant ascites. Increased ascites to serum relation of proteins and lipoproteins in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis as compared to patients with cirrhosis of the liver.

The existence of marked elevations of ascitic fluid cholesterol has been observed in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis compared to patients with cirrhosis and has been found useful in differential diagnosis. This finding could be caused by an enhanced movement of plasma lipoproteins into the peritoneal cavity. To test this hypothesis we determined the fasting concentrations of total, high density lipoprotein (HDL)- and low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, apolipoprotein-A1 (apo-A1) and apolipoprotein-B (apo-B) in serum and ascites of 17 patients with cirrhosis and 16 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. The movement of proteins from plasma to ascites was calculated from the ascites/serum concentration ratios of six different sized proteins with a molecular mass ranging from 54 kDa to 971 kDa. Mean values (mg/dl) for total cholesterol (92.6 vs. 21.0), HDL-cholesterol (15.6 vs. 1.8), LDL-cholesterol (63.4 vs. 16.1), apo-A1 (50.2 vs. 13.6) and apo-B (41.2 vs. 12.9) in ascites were significantly higher in peritoneal carcinomatosis than in cirrhosis. These differences could only partially be explained by the higher serum concentrations of these parameters in peritoneal carcinomatosis, but were mainly due to a lower selectivity for the movement of plasma proteins and lipoproteins into ascites (mean ascites/serum (A/S) ratio: 0.30-0.77) in peritoneal carcinomatosis as compared to cirrhosis (mean ascites/serum ratio: 0.11-0.21). In both groups about 85% of the total cholesterol in serum and ascites consisted of HDL- and LDL-cholesterol. These findings support the hypothesis that elevations in ascitic cholesterol in peritoneal carcinomatosis compared to cirrhosis are mainly caused by the increased movement of plasma HDL and LDL into the peritoneal cavity.

Apolipoprotein A-I↗

PubMed1986

[Studies on fibrinolysis and ascites accumulation associated with peritonitis carcinomatosa--effects of protease inhibitors (PI) on MM2 ascites tumor growth, ascites accumulation and fibrinolysis].

The effects of protease inhibitors(PI), t-AMCHA, gabexate, aprotinin and heparin on the growth of mouse MM2 ascites tumor (MAT) and on several components of fibrinolysis were studied. The drugs were administered intraperitoneally one time daily for 12 days, one day after the tumor transplant. The volumes of ascites, total packed cell volume (TPCV) and fibrinolytic parameters (FDP, whole plasmin, plasminogen activator (PA)) were measured on the 8, 10 and 12th days of therapy. Fibrinolytic activity was assayed by the lysin sepharose affinity chromatography-radio caseinolytic method. Fibrinolytic activity in the ascites increased during the tumor growth. The ascites accumulation as well as levels of FDP, whole plasmin and PA in the drug treated group were significantly decreased when compared to the control group. In these drug-treated groups, MAT cells agglutinated in the abdominal cavity, but in contrast to this, no agglutination was observed in the control group. It was uncertain whether PI directly inhibited tumor growth. The fact that PI inhibited the ascites accumulation and also decreased fibrinolytic activity suggest the involvement of protease in the neoplastic process and indicates another therapeutic approach to malignant ascites tumors.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Value of ascitic lipids and sero-ascitic gradient of albumin in the differential diagnosis of ascites].

In order to compare its diagnostic value in the differentiation between malignant and hepatic ascites, we analysed the ascitic fluid concentrations of cholesterol (Ct) and triglycerides (Tg) and the serum-ascites albumin gradient (S-A alb grad) in 58 patients--forty one with chronic liver disease (CLD) and 17 with malignancy. In CLD group the mean values +/- SD for Ct (27.1 +/- 20.1 mg/dl), Tg (34.2 +/- 33.8 mg/dl) and S-A alb grad (1.9 +/- 0.6 g/dl) were significantly different from those obtained in malignant ascites (Ct 103.1 +/- 45.1 mg/dl; Tg 62.1 +/- 43.0 mg/dl; S-A alb grad 0.5 +/- 0.4 g/dl) (p less than 0.001 for all parameters). Application of the cutoff concentrations given in the literature revealed the following results: Ct-Sensitivity (Se) 82.4%, Specificity (Sp) 85.4%, Efficiency (E) 84.5%; Tg-Se 29.4%, Sp 95.1%, E 75.9%; S-A alb grad- Se 88.2%, Sp 97.6%, E 94.8%. The exclusion of the 4 patients with massive hepatic metastasis from malignant group by ultrasound or computer tomography gave an efficiency of 87.0% for Ct, 88.9% for Tg and 98.1% for S-A alb grad. We conclude that: 1) S-A alb grad is the best analysed parameter in the discrimination between malignant and hepatic ascites, 2) the combination with non-invasive imaging methods increases its diagnostic value.

Albumins↗

PubMed1986

Ascites kinetics in cirrhosis: relationship to plasma-ascites hydrostatic-oncotic balance and intensity of renal sodium retention.

The factors controlling ascites formation and reabsorption, as well as the relationship of ascites dynamics to renal sodium retention complicating cirrhosis, are not defined. We measured, using labeled albumin, the ascites albumin clearance rate, the plasma-ascites and ascites-plasma albumin filtration rates, the ascites albumin exit rate, and the plasma-ascites and ascites-plasma albumin transfer rates in seven patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Wedged hepatic vein pressure (WHVP), right atrial pressure (RAP), ascites pressure (AP), and serum and ascites oncotic pressure (SOP, AOP) were used to calculate the net hydrostatic (WHVP - AP), oncotic (SOP - AOP) and hydrostatic-oncotic pressure, or "transfer" pressure, favoring ascites formation [(WHVP - AP) - (SOP - AOP)], and the net hydrostatic pressure favoring ascites reabsorption (AP - RAP). Over 4 hours: the ascites albumin exit rate greater than the plasma-ascites albumin transfer rate greater than the ascites-plasma albumin transfer rate (P less than 0.05), and the ascites albumin clearance rate greater than the plasma-ascites and ascites-plasma albumin filtration rates (P less than 0.05). The ascites-plasma albumin filtration rate was inversely related to ascites volume (r = 0.91, P less than 0.01). Calculating the ascites-plasma albumin transfer rate from the extrapolated ascites-plasma albumin filtration rate at an ascites volume of 0 (0.031 L/hr/m2) produced values similar to the mean plasma-ascites albumin transfer rate (0.20 + 0.11 gm/hr/m2 vs. 0.24 + 0.13 gm/hr/m2, not significant).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Albumins↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Ascitic fluid analysis in malignancy-related ascites.

A prospective study identified 45 patients with malignancy-related ascites among 448 ascites patients (10% of the total). Patients were categorized into five subgroups based on the pathophysiology of ascites formation. Each subgroup had a distinctive ascitic fluid analysis. Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis but without massive liver metastases (53.3% of the patients with malignancy-related ascites) had a uniformly positive ascitic fluid cytology, high ascitic fluid protein concentration and low serum-ascites albumin gradient. Patients with massive liver metastases and no other cause for ascites formation (13.3% of the series) had a negative cytology, low ascitic fluid protein concentration, high serum-ascites albumin gradient and markedly elevated serum alkaline phosphatase. Those with peritoneal carcinomatosis and massive liver metastases (13.3% of the series) had a nearly uniformly positive ascitic fluid cytology, variable protein concentration, high serum-ascites albumin gradient and markedly elevated serum alkaline phosphatase. Chylous ascites (6.7%) was characterized by a milky appearance, negative cytology and an elevated ascitic fluid triglyceride concentration. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma superimposed on cirrhosis (13.3%) had negative ascitic fluid cytology, low ascitic fluid protein concentration, high serum-ascites albumin gradient and elevated serum and ascitic fluid alpha-fetoprotein concentration. Two-thirds of patients with malignancy-related ascites had peritoneal carcinomatosis; 96.7% of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis had positive ascitic fluid cytology. Ascitic fluid analysis is helpful in identifying and distinguishing the subgroups of malignancy-related ascites.

Alkaline Phosphatase↗

PubMed1988

Usefulness of serum-ascites albumin difference in separating transudative from exudative ascites. Another look.

The serum-ascites albumin difference is reported to be superior to ascitic total protein, ascitic-to-serum total protein ratio, lactic dehydrogenase, and ascitic-to-serum lactic dehydrogenase ratio in differentiating between ascites from liver disease and malignant ascites, S-A greater than 1.1 reflecting portal hypertension. We analyzed ascitic fluid from 46 consecutive patients with chronic liver disease, 28 patients with ascites associated with malignancy, 10 patients with right-sided heart failure, 4 patients with hypothyroidism, and 6 patients with miscellaneous causes of ascites to determine if this albumin difference is indeed a more valuable parameter. Analysis of our data confirms with a larger number of patients that the serum-ascites albumin difference is a more reliable indicator of transudative ascites, better termed portal hypertensive ascites. Malignant ascites without liver metastases had features of nonportal hypertensive ascites, and the serum-ascites albumin difference confirms this. The characteristics of malignant ascites associated with liver metastases, however, resemble those of the portal hypertensive ascites complicating liver disease. This new parameter is also helpful in distinguishing congestive heart failure with high protein ascites and portal hypertensive ascitic features from malignant ascites without liver metastases. Of particular note, myxedematous ascitic fluid, classically categorized as exudative, had an S-A greater than 1.1, indicating the possible role of portal hypertension in the development of ascites in these patients.

Ascitic Fluid↗

PubMed1990

Ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear cell count and serum to ascites albumin gradient in the diagnosis of bacterial peritonitis.

The analysis of ascitic fluid has been complicated by several recently reported new tests. To simplify this assessment, we evaluated nine parameters prospectively and simultaneously in blood and ascitic fluid from 285 patients with ascites to determine which were the most reliable for immediate diagnosis of the etiology of the ascites and of its complications. Subjects were first divided into four groups: sterile cirrhotic ascites (n = 201), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (n = 41), malignant ascites (n = 34), and miscellaneous ascites (n = 9). An ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear count greater than 500/microliters was the test with the greatest accuracy (96%) for the diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Neither the most precise cutoff values for ascitic fluid pH (less than 7.32) and ascitic fluid lactate (greater than 32 mg/dl), nor their respective blood-ascitic fluid gradients (greater than 0.11 and less than -20 mg/dl) were more reliable indexes of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, mainly due to the decreased ascitic fluid pH and increased ascitic fluid lactate observed in malignant ascites, tuberculous peritonitis, and pancreatic ascites. A blood-ascitic fluid albumin gradient less than 1.1 g/dl was the most accurate parameter for the diagnosis of malignant ascites (diagnostic efficacy, 93%). Therefore, the etiologic analysis of ascitic fluid might be simplified and the single practice of two tests, ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear cell count and blood-ascitic fluid albumin gradient, provides immediately useful information.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Clinical value of tumour markers and serum-ascites albumin gradient in the diagnosis of malignancy-related ascites.

To determine the clinical value of tumour markers in the diagnosis of malignancy-related ascites (not including hepatocellular carcinoma), serum and ascitic fluid levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, cancer antigen 125, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, tissue polypeptide antigen and serum-ascites albumin gradient were determined in 66 patients with cirrhotic ascites, 28 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and ascites, and 29 patients with malignancy-related ascites. Three tumour markers and serum-ascites albumin gradient showed significant difference between patients with malignancy-related ascites and those without: serum carcinoembryonic antigen (26.4 +/- 31.5 vs 4.8 +/- 4.6 ng/mL, P < 0.01), ascitic fluid carcinoembryonic antigen (118.4 +/- 196.5 vs 2.0 +/- 1.4 ng/mL, P < 0.01), ascitic fluid carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (12,933 +/- 25,496 vs 23 +/- 67 U/mL, P < 0.01) and serum-ascites albumin gradient (1.1 +/- 0.4 vs 2.0 +/- 0.4 g/dL, P < 0.01). At the best cut-off levels chosen from near 95% of the data in those without malignancy-related ascites, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy to diagnose malignancy-related ascites were, respectively, 65.5%, 93.6%, 87.0% using serum carcinoembryonic antigen > or = 10 ng/mL; 69.0%, 94.7%, 88.6% using ascitic fluid carcinoembryonic antigen > or = 5 ng/mL; 65.5%, 93.6%, 87.0% using ascitic fluid carbohydrate antigen 19-9 > or = 50 U/mL; 62.1%, 98.9%, 90.2% using serum-ascites albumin gradient < 1.1 g/dL. Although serum-ascites albumin gradient offered the best diagnostic accuracy and specificity, its sensitivity was not good enough. Our study indicates that serum-ascites albumin gradient and tumour markers are not sensitive parameters in the diagnosis of malignancy-related ascites.

Ascites↗

PubMed1994

The value of ascites adenosine deaminase activity and interferon gamma level in discriminating tuberculous from non-tuberculous ascites.

The diagnosis of tuberculous ascites is often difficult because of the subtle clinical clues, poorly discriminative biochemical assays, delayed results of bacteriological studies and hazards of laparoscopy. Therefore, the role of ascites adenosine deaminase (ADA) activity and interferon-gamma (IFN-delta) level in distinguishing tuberculous from other causes of ascites was examined in 50 patients with ascites. Following bacteriologic culture, seventeen (34%) patients were found to have tuberculous ascites; nine (59.9%) of them had also schistosomal hepatic fibrosis (SHF). Therefore, 36% (9 out of 25) of all patients with SHF included in the study, had coexistent peritoneal tuberculosis despite the presence of transudative ascites and unrecognized clinical features. Ascites ADA activity was significantly higher in tuberculous than in other causes of ascites (P < 0.001) regardless of the presence of an underlying liver disease. A cut-off of 28 U/L reached a sensitivity of 94.4% and a specificity of 100%. A direct correlation was found between ascites ADA activity and total proteins in the tuberculous group (r = 0.613) and the only false-negative result occurred in a patient with SHF and low-ascites protein. Ascites IFN-delta level was also significantly higher in tuberculous ascites with or without SHF than in other causes of ascites (P < 0.05). A cut-off of 26 pg/ml reached a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 100%. There was no correlation between ascites ADA activity and IFN-delta level in the tuberculous group (r = 0.329). Based on the results of the present study, it can be concluded that tuberculous ascites should be considered as an important cause of ascites particularly in patients with underlying liver disease. Ascites ADA activity was more sensitive than ascites IFN-delta in diagnosing tuberculosis (TB). It has proved to be an easy, rapid, safe and reliable method for routine use in the early diagnosis of tuberculous ascites.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

PubMed1991

Ascitic fluid pH and lactate: insensitive and nonspecific tests in detecting ascitic fluid infection.

Ascitic fluid pH and lactate concentration have been proposed as useful tests for the detection of ascitic fluid infection. However, past studies involved small numbers of infected patients, and all did not use optimal culture techniques. This large study was performed using highly sensitive culture methods and sought (a) to compare the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of pH and lactate to that of the ascitic fluid neutrophil count and (b) to determine whether evaluation of ascitic fluid pH or lactate (or arterial-ascitic fluid pH or lactate gradient) would result in improved decision-making regarding empirical treatment of suspected ascitic fluid infection. Analysis of 206 ascitic fluid specimens obtained in 175 patients, including 101 infected specimens, revealed that ascitic fluid (or arterial-ascitic fluid) pH and lactate were less than 50% sensitive in detecting bacterial peritonitis and that these tests did not improve clinical decision-making about empirical treatment of suspected ascitic fluid infection. Although statistically significant differences in ascitic fluid pH were detected between infected samples and control samples, these differences did not appear to be clinically helpful. The ascitic fluid pH was 0% sensitive in detecting the presence of bacteria in the absence of neutrophils (i.e., no such specimens had a pH lower than 7.35). Ascitic fluid pH correlated well with neutrophil count and appears to be, at least in part, an indirect measure of the presence of neutrophils in ascitic fluid. Measurement of pH or lactate (or arterial-ascitic fluid gradients) is not helpful in the clinical management of infected ascitic fluid.

Ascites↗

PubMed1992

The serum-ascites albumin gradient is superior to the exudate-transudate concept in the differential diagnosis of ascites.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the serum-ascites albumin gradient to the exudate-transudate concept in the classification of ascites. DESIGN: Prospective collection of ascitic fluid data from patients with well-characterized causes of ascites. SETTING: Hepatology inpatient and outpatient ward and consult service of a large, urban hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 901 paired serum and ascitic fluid samples were collected from consecutive patients with all forms of ascites. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The utility of the serum-ascites albumin gradient and the old exudate-transudate concept (as defined by ascitic fluid total protein concentration [AFTP]) were compared for their ability in discriminating the cause for ascites formation. RESULTS: The albumin gradient correctly differentiated causes of ascites due to portal hypertension from those that were not due to portal hypertension 96.7% of the time. The AFTP, when used as defined in the old exudate-transudate concept, classified the causes of ascites correctly only 55.6% of the time. This resulted in part because the AFTP of most spontaneously infected samples (traditionally expected to be exudates) was low, and the AFTP of most cardiac ascites samples (traditionally expected to be transudates) was high. CONCLUSIONS: The exudate-transudate concept should be discarded in the classification of ascites. The serum-ascites albumin gradient is far more useful than the AFTP as a marker for portal hypertension, but the latter remains a useful adjunct in the differential diagnosis of ascites.

Albumins↗

PubMed1989

[Concentration of lipids in ascitic fluid and the concentration gradient of albumin in blood and ascites: diagnostic significance].

The aim of this study was to test the diagnostic value of ascitic fluid cholesterol and triglycerides concentrations and of serum-ascites albumin concentration gradient in the differentiation between cirrhotic and malignant ascites. These biological parameters were determined, on the one hand in 34 cirrhotic patients, 6 of them having an hepatocellular carcinoma and 6 others having a spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and, on the other hand, in 16 patients with malignant ascites, 13 of them having an abdominal extra-hepatic or pelvic cancer, and 3 others having an extra-abdominal cancer with multiple liver metastases. Ascitic carcinoembryonic antigen assay and ascitic fluid cytology were also done in the 50 patients. In differentiating the cirrhotic patients from those with malignancy, ascitic fluid cholesterol concentration (discriminating value less than 1.1 mmol/l) ascitic fluid triglycerides concentration (discriminating value 0.5 mmol/l) and serum-ascites albumin concentration gradient (discriminating value greater than 11 g/l) allowed a diagnostic efficiency of 0.92, 0.80 and 0.77, respectively. Ascitic fluid cytology showed presence of malignant cells in 3/6 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma associated with cirrhosis, in 9/16 patients having a malignant ascites, and was negative in other patients. Ascitic carcinoembryonic antigen assay was abnormal only in 3/16 patients with malignant ascites. These results suggest that measurement of ascitic fluid cholesterol concentration must be included in the initial evaluation of patients with ascites of unknown origin.

Albumins↗

PubMed1987

Proteases and antiproteases related to the coagulation system in plasma and ascites--an approach to differentiate between malignant and cirrhotic ascites.

The concentrations of several proteases and antiproteases known to be present in ascites were tested in plasma and ascitic fluid with regard to their ability to separate ascites according to malignant or nonmalignant disease. Seventeen patients with proven malignant ascites and 37 with ascites due to liver cirrhosis were included. Activities of plasminogen, alpha 2-antiplasmin, antithrombin-III, and factor V, and the concentration of alpha 1-protease inhibitor were significantly higher in the plasma of patients with malignant ascites than in cirrhotic patients. Fibronectin, plasminogen, alpha 2-macroglobulin, alpha 1-protease inhibitor, antithrombin-III, and albumin revealed higher concentrations or activities in malignant ascites than in cirrhotic ascites. Due to a wide variation of most parameters, only fibronectin, antithrombin III, and alpha 1-protease inhibitor in ascites had a sensitivity and specificity higher than 90% for malignant ascites. When the specific protein/albumin ratio was used, only the accuracy of fibronectin was increased reaching a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. The plasma/ascites gradients of the proteins assessed differed significantly, that of fibronectin being much higher (22 +/- 7) than that of all other proteins. In malignant ascites fibronectin concentration was only correlated with alpha 1-protease inhibitor concentration but not with the concentration or activity of all other proteins, while in cirrhotic ascites most proteins revealed a positive correlation. The determination of the fibronectin concentration or the fibronectin/albumin ratio in ascites can differentiate malignant and nonmalignant ascites. All other proteases and antiproteases assessed are of lesser value for this purpose, although most are significantly increased in ascites and plasma of patients with malignant disorders.

Antithrombin III↗