SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “awake craniotomy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

["Asleep-awake-asleep"-anaesthetic technique for awake craniotomy].

Awake craniotomy in tumor and epilepsy surgery or for the implantation of electrodes for deep brain stimulation requires specific anesthesiological strategies. Propofol allows for quick emergence and has little effect on the respiratory function of the usually spontaneously breathing patient. Pain control may be instituted by hemiscalp block for trepanation or local infiltration for deep brain electrode implantation. In addition, low dose remifentanil is recommended for trepanation (i.e. tumor or epilepsy surgery). The airway may be secured by an ordinary Magill tube placed transnasally with its tip underneath the epiglottis. To protect the patient against vomiting an adequate antiemetic prophylaxis is required.

Anesthesia↗

PubMed2002

Postoperative nausea and vomiting after craniotomy for tumor surgery: a comparison between awake craniotomy and general anesthesia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients following an awake craniotomy compared to general anesthesia for tumor surgery. DESIGN: Prospective observational and chart review of all patients having a craniotomy for tumor during one year. SETTING: Postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and intensive care unit (ICU) of a university hospital. PATIENTS: 187 patients were reviewed. 107 patients who had a craniotomy for supratentorial tumor that was less than six hours in duration were analyzed and compared (50 awake craniotomy vs. 57 general anesthesia). INTERVENTIONS: Medical records were reviewed for events after the first four hours until discharge. The occurrence and the time of any nausea, vomiting; the administration of antiemetics and analgesic drugs; and complications were documented. MEASUREMENTS: Frequency of nausea, vomiting, administration of antiemetics and analgesia, and outcome between the two groups were compared using Chi-square and Student's t-test. MAIN RESULTS: The frequency of nausea (4% vs. 23%; p = 0.012) and vomiting (0% vs. 11%; p = 0.052) were less in patients having an awake craniotomy compared to general anesthesia, but only during the first four hours. The administration of postoperative analgesia was not different between the two groups and did not influence the frequency of PONV. CONCLUSION: The frequency of PONV during the initial recovery phase was less in patients having an awake craniotomy for tumor surgery than in patients having a similar procedure with general anesthesia.

Analgesics↗

PubMed2003

Anaesthesia for awake craniotomy--evolution of a technique that facilitates awake neurological testing.

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing trend towards performing craniotomy awake. The challenge for the anaesthetist is to provide adequate analgesia and sedation, haemodynamic stability, and a safe airway, with an awake, cooperative patient for neurological testing. METHODS: The records of all patients who had awake craniotomy at our institution were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups according to anaesthetic technique. Patients in Group 1 were sedated throughout the procedure. Patients in Groups 2 and 3 had an asleep-awake-asleep technique. Those in Group 2 were anaesthetized with a propofol infusion and fentanyl, and breathed spontaneously through a laryngeal mask airway (LMA). Patients in Group 3 had total i.v. anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil, and ventilation was controlled using an LMA. We noted the incidence of complications in each group. RESULTS: There were 99 procedures carried out between 1989 and 2002. Group 3 had the fewest complications. No patients in Group 3 developed hypercapnia (E'(CO(2)) >6 kPa), compared with all of the patients in Group 2. Patients in Group 1 had no E'(CO(2)) monitoring, but 7% developed airway obstruction. No patients in Group 3 required additional analgesia for pain, compared with 70% of patients in Group 2. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a technique for craniotomy, which facilitates awake neurological testing, is safe, and has good patient satisfaction.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Dexmedetomidine and neurocognitive testing in awake craniotomy.

Patients are selected for awake craniotomy when the planned procedure involves eloquent areas of the brain, necessitating an awake, cooperative patient capable of undergoing neurocognitive testing. Different anesthetic combinations, including neurolept, propofol with or without opioid infusions, and asleep-awake-asleep techniques, have been reported for awake craniotomy. In all these techniques, respiratory depression has been reported as a complication. In this case series dexmedetomidine, the highly selective alpha-2 adrenoreceptor agonist, was selected for its lack of respiratory depression as well as its sedative and analgesic properties. The charts of 10 consecutive patients who underwent awake craniotomy with dexmedetomidine infusion were reviewed. Five of the patients underwent "asleep-awake" technique with a laryngeal mask airway and volatile agent. Five patients received moderate to conscious sedation. All patients received a dexmedetomidine load of 0.5 to 1.0 microg/kg over 20 minutes followed by an infusion at rates of 0.01 to 1.0 microg/kg per hour. Four patients had extensive sensory and motor testing, and six underwent neurocognitive testing, including naming, reading, counting, and verbal fluency. There were no permanent neurologic deficits, except one patient who had an exacerbation of preoperative language difficulties. Dexmedetomidine appears to be a useful sedative for awake craniotomy when sophisticated neurologic testing is required.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

PubMed2006

Anesthetic complications of awake craniotomies for epilepsy surgery.

Awake craniotomies are often performed for resection of epileptogenic foci close to vital areas of the brain. For awake craniotomies at our institution, propofol is infused during local anesthetic injection and craniotomy, spontaneous ventilation is preserved, and no endotracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway is used. Propofol is discontinued for language, motor, and/or sensory mapping and for electrocorticography. Patients are re-sedated with propofol for resection and closure. We performed a retrospective chart review of 332 propofol-based "asleep-awake-asleep" (AAA) techniques with unsecured airways and 129 general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation craniotomies for epilepsy surgery. We compared the incidence of intraoperative respiratory and hemodynamic complications and incidence of seizures, nausea, brain swelling, patient movement, bleeding, aspiration, air embolism, and death. Airway compromise was uncommon in AAA cases and although incidences of hypertension, hypotension, and tachycardia were statistically increased in AAA versus general anesthesia craniotomy, these were treated appropriately. In only one patient the use of our AAA technique may have contributed to a poor clinical outcome.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

The experiences of nurses who participate in awake craniotomy procedures.

In awake craniotomy is a unique neurosurgical procedure in which the patient is conscious during part of the procedure. Little has been documented about how instrument nurses (ie, scrub persons) react to this complex procedure and to the tasks of caring for a conscious patient. A phenomenological investigation was conducted to document the experiences of nine instrument nurses. The nurses were challenged by having to manage the conscious presence of the patient, they placed great importance on controlling the surgical situation, and they reported that participating in this procedure had a compelling emotional effect on them.

Craniotomy↗

PubMed2003

Awake craniotomy in glioma surgery.

Awake craniotomy is the cheapest and most reliable method to ensure neurological integrity in cerebral gliomas that infiltrate or come close to the eloquent areas of the brain, allowing (a) the localization of eloquent cortical areas by electrical stimulation and epileptic foci by cortical recording, and (b) the monitoring of the functional integrity of awake patients while aiming at subtotal removal of the gliomatous tissue. In addition, awake craniotomy opens a brief but unique window to the living brain for (a) basic neuroscience, including verification of preoperative functional imaging data and recording of electrophysiological correlates of mental processes, and for (b) applied research, including development of innovative instrumentation for brain recording and monitoring as well as screening for potential areas to be modulated in movement disorders and chronic pain.

Brain Neoplasms↗

PubMed2002

Usefulness of monitoring brain tissue oxygen pressure during awake craniotomy for tumor resection: a case report.

Awake craniotomy is indicated for surgical resection of tumors located near eloquent areas of the brain. The anesthetic technique is based on a combination of local anesthesia, sedation, and analgesia. Usually only clinical parameters are assessed and no other cerebral oxygenation monitoring techniques are applied. The authors report the use of brain tissue oxygen pressure monitoring during awake craniotomy. A 48-year-old right-handed man with a left temporoparietal mass was scheduled for awake craniotomy, cortical stimulation, and selective tumor removal. Monitoring included electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, end-tidal CO2, bladder temperature, invasive and noninvasive arterial pressure, and brain tissue oxygen pressure (PtiO2). The anesthetic technique consisted of continuous perfusions of 0.02 to 0.05 microg/kg/min remifentanil, propofol (target concentration, 0.5 to 1.2 microg/mL), and 25 to 50 microg/kg/min esmolol, and local anesthetic blockade of the head pin insertion sites and surgical incision area (a mixture of 0.2% ropivacaine, 1% lidocaine, and epinephrine, 1:200 000). Intraoperative cortical stimulation was performed to guide the resection according to the patient's verbal response. A change in PtiO2 was observed, gradually falling from 28 mm Hg at the beginning of the intervention down to 3 mm Hg. At this stage, surgical resection was concluded. On arrival at the intensive care unit, mixed dysphasia and slight weakness of the right arm were noted. Three weeks after surgery, the patient's speech is improving and the motor deficit has disappeared. This case suggests a possible role of PtiO2 in awake craniotomy as an aid in detecting intraoperative adverse events, but further experience with PtiO2 in this setting is needed.

Anesthesia↗

PubMed2006

Use of dexmedetomidine in awake craniotomy in adolescents: report of two cases.

Awake craniotomy is a key tool in resection of lesions near critical functional regions, particularly the speech area. Craniotomy with an awake portion for mapping may be performed in carefully selected adolescents and preteenaged children. A number of different regimens may be used for sedation and anesthesia in these cases. We describe two adolescent patients in whom awake craniotomy was performed using an intravenous anesthesia technique with dexmedetomidine and without need for airway instrumentation.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

The effect of propofol on intraoperative electrocorticography and cortical stimulation during awake craniotomies in children.

Propofol has been proposed as a sedative agent during awake craniotomies. However, there are reports of propofol suppressing spontaneous epileptiform electrocorticography (ECoG) activity during seizure surgery, while others describe propofol-induced epileptiform activity. The purpose of this study was to determine if propofol interferes with ECoG and direct cortical stimulation during awake craniotomies in children. Children scheduled for awake craniotomies for resection of epileptic foci or tumours were studied. An intravenous bolus of 1-2 mg.kg-1 followed by infusion of 100-200 microgram.kg-1.min-1 of propofol was administered to induce unconsciousness. Fentanyl (0.5 microgram.kg-1) was administered incrementally to provide analgesia. After the cortex was exposed, the propofol infusion was stopped and the patient permitted to awaken. Cortical electrodes were applied. ECoG was recorded continuously on a Grass polygraph. Motor, sensory, language, and memory testing were done throughout the procedure. The cortex was stimulated with a hand-held electrode using sequential increases in voltage to map the relevant speech and motor areas. We studied 12 children (aged 11-15 years) with intractable seizures. The raw ECoG did not reveal any prolonged beta-waves associated with propofol effect. Electroencephalogram spikes due to spontaneous activity or cortical stimulation were easily detected. Cognitive, memory and speech testing was also successful. We conclude that propofol did not interfere with intraoperative ECoG during awake craniotomies. Using this technique, we were able to fully assess motor, sensory, cognitive, speech and memory function and simultaneously avoid routine airway manipulation.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Venous air embolism during awake craniotomy in a supine patient.

PURPOSE: To report a non-fatal case of intraoperative venous air embolism (VAE) during an awake craniotomy. VAE presented with unusual clinical features. CLINICAL FEATURES: VAE during an awake craniotomy has not been reported frequently. The patient we describe presented with persistent coughing followed by tachypnea, hypoxia and reduction in end-tidal CO(2) during dural opening while undergoing an awake craniotomy in the supine position. Cardiovascular variables were stable during the episode except for transient hypertension. Having ruled out airway obstruction and low cardiac output, we concluded that air embolism was the cause. The patient responded immediately to the standard treatment of air embolism and recovered without any complication. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates a VAE during an awake craniotomy and emphasizes the importance of early diagnosis in the management.

Brain Neoplasms↗

PubMed1993

Comparison of fentanyl, sufentanil and alfentanil during awake craniotomy for epilepsy.

Neurolept anaesthesia is used during awake craniotomy for epilepsy surgery. This study compares analgesia, sedation and the side effects of the newer opioids sufentanil and alfentanil, with those of fentanyl in patients undergoing awake craniotomy. Thirty patients were randomized into three groups, each received droperidol, dimenhydrinate and the chosen opioid as a bolus followed by an infusion. The opioid doses used were fentanyl 0.75 microgram.kg-1 plus 0.01 microgram.kg-1 x min-1; sufentanil 0.075 microgram.kg-1 plus 0.0015 microgram.kg-1 x min-1, and alfentanil 7.5 micrograms.kg-1 plus 0.5 microgram.kg-1 x min-1. There were no differences in the requirements for droperidol, dimenhydrinate or in the incidence of complications among the three groups. The total doses of the opioids required were fentanyl 4.9 +/- 1.3 micrograms.kg-1, sufentanil 0.6 +/- 0.2 microgram.kg-1 and alfentanil 149 +/- 36 micrograms.kg-1. Two patients became uncooperative requiring general anesthesia. The conditions for surgery, electrocorticography and for stimulation testing were satisfactory in all other patients. We conclude that the newer opioids did not offer any benefit over fentanyl.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Awake Craniotomy for Eloquent Region Glioblastoma Classified by Tumor Location-A Retrospective and Prospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of awake craniotomy (AC) with intraoperative mapping for glioblastoma (GBM) in eloquent regions remains debated. This study aims to evaluate functional and survival outcomes of GBM patients undergoing AC stratified by tumor locations. METHODS: A combined retrospective (2015-2023, n = 114: 43 AC vs. 71 standard craniotomy) and prospective cohort (2023-2025, n = 28: 13 AC vs. 15 standard craniotomy) of GBM patients with motor/language-eloquent tumors was analyzed. Tumors were classified into motor subtypes (I: precentral gyrus; II: premotor/supplementary motor; III: internal capsule posterior limb; IV: other) and language subtypes (I: Broca's/precentral; II: postcentral/supramarginal gyrus; III: Wernicke's; IV: insular; V: other). Outcomes included extent of resection (EOR), postoperative motor/language recovery, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: The retrospective cohort demonstrated that AC has advantages in functional preservation across various motor/language subtypes. However, AC was associated with significantly deteriorated survival outcomes specifically in precentral gyrus GBMs. A prospective cohort study, enrolling only precentral gyrus GBMs for validation, yielded results consistent with the retrospective findings: worsened OS and PFS (OS: HR = 3.223, p = 0.0450; PFS: HR = 2.374, p = 0.0476); reduced EOR (AC: 74.3% ± 5.3%; standard craniotomy: 86.9% ± 12.3%, p = 0.0470); and better motor recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Functional preservation and survival outcomes of AC in GBM exhibited subtype-specific correlations with tumor locations. AC with intraoperative mapping effectively preserves neurological function in GBM patients. However, for tumors involving the precentral gyrus, the AC approach carries greater risks than benefits and should be considered with caution. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Strategic Intervention on Preserving Motor Function During Awake Craniotomy: NCT05143788. Strategic Intervention on Preserving Language Function During Awake Craniotomy: NCT05143775.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Brain dysfunction following 'awake' craniotomy, brain mapping and resection of glioma.

The rationale for 'awake' resective brain tumour surgery and brain mapping is that the amount of tumour removed is optimized, and risks of damage to adjacent eloquent brain minimized by intraoperative patient assessments. Both goals are generally attained, but occasionally patients may have iatrogenic postoperative deficits. Five such cases (20%) are described from a consecutive series of 25 awake craniotomies. These patient fell into three distinct clinical categories; those (n = 2) who developed sensory-motor deficits that were recognized intraoperatively; those (n = 2) who had deficits that were apparent only on postoperative testing; and one patient who developed a sudden deficit with no warning. The former four patients had deficits that recovered within weeks to months (16%), but the latter one (4%) was left with a severe focal motor disability. These cases highlight both the benefits and limitations of awake craniotomy and intraoperative assessment. Although sensory-motor deficits can be recognized early, some high-level neurological functions may not be readily assessed intraoperatively and vascular catastrophes may occur without warning. The pathophysiological basis of these iatrogenic neurological deficits, and techniques to minimize such problems are discussed.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Anaesthesia for awake craniotomy with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation.

Airway management during awake craniotomy is a crucial part of the anaesthetic technique, but it remains the subject of debate. We report two cases of anaesthesia for awake craniotomy using non-invasive positive pressure ventilation; biphasic positive airway pressure or proportional assist ventilation was employed. Both ventilatory techniques provided adequate lung ventilation, smooth transition between anaesthesia and arousal, and patient comfort.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Awake craniotomy with brain mapping as the routine surgical approach to treating patients with supratentorial intraaxial tumors: a prospective trial of 200 cases.

OBJECT: Awake craniotomy was performed as the standard surgical approach to supratentorial intraaxial tumors, regardless of the involvement of eloquent cortex, in a prospective trial of 200 patients surgically treated by the same surgeon at a single institution. METHODS: Patient presentations, comorbid conditions, tumor locations, and the histological characteristics of lesions were recorded. Brain mapping was possible in 195 (97.5%) of 200 patients. The total number of patients sustaining complications was 33 for an overall complication rate of 16.5%. There were two deaths in this series, for a mortality rate of 1%. New postoperative neurological deficits were seen in 13% of the patients, but these were permanent in only 4.5% of them. Complication rates were higher in patients who had gliomas or preoperative neurological deficits and in those who had undergone prior radiation therapy or surgery. No patient who entered the operating room neurologically intact sustained a permanent neurological deficit postoperatively. Of the most recent 50 patients treated, three (6%) required a stay in the intensive care unit, and the median total hospital stay was 1 day. CONCLUSIONS: Use of awake craniotomy can result in a considerable reduction in resource utilization without compromising patient care by minimizing intensive care time and total hospital stay. Awake craniotomy is a practical and effective standard surgical approach to supratentorial tumors with a low complication rate, and provides an excellent alternative to craniotomy performed with the patient in the state of general anesthesia because it allows the opportunity for brain mapping and avoids general anesthesia.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Awake craniotomy for removal of intracranial tumor: considerations for early discharge.

UNLABELLED: We retrospectively reviewed the anesthetic management, complications, and discharge time of 241 patients undergoing awake craniotomy for removal of intracranial tumor to determine the feasibility of early discharge. The results were analyzed by using univariate analysis of variance and multiple logistic regression. The median length of stay for inpatients was 4 days. Fifteen patients (6%) were discharged 6 h after surgery and 76 patients (31%) were discharged on the next day. Anesthesia was provided by using local infiltration supplemented with neurolept anesthesia consisting of midazolam, fentanyl, and propofol. There was no significant difference in the total amount of sedation required. Overall, anesthetic complications were minimal. One patient (0.4%) required conversion to general anesthesia and one patient developed a venous air embolus. Fifteen patients (6%) had self-limiting intraoperative seizures that were short-lived. Of the 16 patients scheduled for ambulatory surgery, there was one readmission and one unanticipated admission. It may be feasible to discharge patients on the same or the next day after awake craniotomy for removal of intracranial tumor. However, caution is advised and patient selection must be stringent with regards to the preoperative functional status of the patient, tumor depth, surrounding edema, patient support at home, and ease of access to hospital for readmission. IMPLICATIONS: It may be feasible to perform awake craniotomies for removal of intracranial tumor as an ambulatory procedure; however, caution is advised. Patient selection must be stringent with respect to the patient's preoperative functional status, tumor depth, surrounding edema, patient support at home, and ease of access to hospital for readmission.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Multimodal protocol for awake craniotomy in language cortex tumour surgery.

BACKGROUND: Intra-operative neurophysiological language mapping has become an established procedure in patients operated on for tumours in the area of the language cortex. Awake cranial surgery has specific risks and patients are exposed to an increased physical and mental stress. The aim of the study was to establish an algorithm that enables tailoring the neurosurgical and anaesthetic techniques to the individual patient. METHOD: A total of 25 patients underwent awake craniotomy for intra-operative language mapping between 1999 and 2004. Following craniotomy under analgesia and sedation without rigid pin fixation of the head, cortical language mapping was performed in the fully co-operative patient. The results of functional magnetic resonance imaging and of cortical language mapping were incorporated into the 3D dataset for neuronavigation. Depending on the functional data and the individual operative risk tumour resection then proceeded either under conscious sedation with the option of subcortical language monitoring or under general anaesthesia. FINDINGS: After cortical language mapping patients are assigned to one of four groups: BACC (Berlin awake craniotomy criteria) I-IV. BACC I (9 patients): adequate functional data+operative risk not increased-->tumour resection in the awake patient; BACC II (4 patients): limited functional data+operative risk not increased-->tumour resection in the awake patient with the option of language monitoring as needed; BACC III (9 patients): adequate functional data+increased operative risk-->tumour resection under general anaesthesia using functional navigation; BACC IV (3 patients): limited functional data+increased operative risk-->tumour resection in the awake patient with the option of language monitoring as needed. We observed less adverse events in group BACC III. No permanent deterioration of language function occurred in this series. CONCLUSIONS: The multimodal protocol for awake craniotomy provides for tumour resection under general anaesthesia in selected patients using functional neuronavigation. Our experience with the algorithm suggests that it is a useful tool for preserving function in patients undergoing surgery of the language cortex while reducing the operative risk on an individual basis.

Adult↗