SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “bacterial virulence”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1989

[Genetic regulatory mechanisms of bacterial virulence].

Bacterial virulence is due to the action of different virulence factors (e.g. adhesins, toxins, capsules). Virulence factors are encoded by special genes termed as virulence genes or virulence determinants. The degree of virulence of one particular bacterial strain depends on the activity of the corresponding virulence genes. Several mechanisms are involved in the regulation of activity of virulence determinants: plasmids and bacteriophages may be received or lost and chromosomal sequences may be deleted. Such processes are directly responsible for the presence or absence of virulence genes in the bacterial genome. Programmed genetic rearrangements may lead to a switch of promoter sequences and are therefore responsible for a variation of virulence expression. "Jumping" of DNA sequences (transposition) and subsequent recombinational events may also cause antigenic variation of virulence factors. In addition frame shift mutations may influence the expression of virulence genes. Transregulatory factors may also influence the expression of virulence factors of pathogenic bacteria. These systems positively influence the expression of different virulence factors in a coordinative manner. They can be triggered by environmental signals.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Type III effector proteins: doppelgangers of bacterial virulence.

Bacterial pathogens have co-evolved with their hosts in their ongoing quest for advantage in the resulting interaction. These intimate associations have resulted in remarkable adaptations of prokaryotic virulence proteins and their eukaryotic molecular targets. An important strategy used by microbial pathogens of animals to manipulate host cellular functions is structural mimicry of eukaryotic proteins. Recent evidence demonstrates that plant pathogens also use structural mimicry of host factors as a virulence strategy. Nearly all virulence proteins from phytopathogenic bacteria have eluded functional annotation on the basis of primary amino-acid sequence. Recent efforts to determine their three-dimensional structures are, however, revealing important clues about the mechanisms of bacterial virulence in plants.

Bacteria↗

PubMed1993

Dynamics of the bacterial genome: deletions and integrations as mechanisms of bacterial virulence modulation.

Bacterial virulence is a multifactorial phenomenon, arising from the coordinate action of special abilities of the infectious agents, termed as virulence factors, which is crucial for the infectious process. The genetic determinants encoding those factors are termed virulence associated genes, which can be located on the bacterial chromosome or on extrachromosomal elements (plasmids). Various examples have repeatedly demonstrated that bacterial genome dynamics contributes to virulence modulation. Strikingly, a reduced in vivo virulence of the pathogens was shown to be due to the spontaneous loss of virulence associated genes. The deletion events can involve chromosomal as well as plasmid regions. Also integration of plasmids into the chromosome are considered as dynamic events. The new genetic location of the formerly plasmid encoded virulence associated genes can result in an alteration of virulence expression.

Bacteria↗

PubMed2005

VFDB: a reference database for bacterial virulence factors.

Bacterial pathogens continue to impose a major threat to public health worldwide in the 21st century. Intensified studies on bacterial pathogenesis have greatly expanded our knowledge about the mechanisms of the disease processes at the molecular level over the last decades. To facilitate future research, it becomes necessary to form a database collectively presenting the virulence factors (VFs) of various medical significant bacterial pathogens. The aim of virulence factor database (VFDB) (http://www.mgc.ac.cn/VFs/) is to provide such a source for scientists to rapidly access to current knowledge about VFs from various bacterial pathogens. VFDB is comprehensive and user-friendly. One can search VFDB by browsing each genus or by typing keywords. Furthermore, a BLAST search tool against all known VF-related genes is also available. VFDB provides a unified gateway to store, search, retrieve and update information about VFs from various bacterial pathogens.

Bacteria↗

PubMed2005

Type-III effectors: sophisticated bacterial virulence factors.

Bacterial pathogens cause a wide spectrum of diseases in human and other animals. Some virulence factors, which are referred to as effectors, are directly translocated into the host cell via an injection apparatus, i.e., the type-III secretion system. Most effectors mimic host molecules, and translocated effectors are thereby able to perturb or modulate host cell signaling, cytoskeletal rearrangement, vesicular traffic, and autophagy, thus eliciting disease. Effectors are roughly classified among exotoxins, but in most cases, their functions are exerted focally when they are translocated into the host cell.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Small GTP binding proteins and bacterial virulence.

Many bacterial toxins and bacterial enzymes modify small GTPases. Toxins exhibit different enzymatic activities on either the switch 1 or switch 2 domains of these small GTPases leading to inactivation or activation of such intracellular timer molecules. In addition, some virulence factors of certain invasive bacteria such as Salmonella also modulate small GTP binding proteins either by mimicking GTPase exchange factors or GTPase activating proteins.

Animals↗

PubMed1994

Proliferation of a bovine mammary epithelial cell line in the presence of bacterial virulence factors.

Effects of bacterial virulence factors on bovine mammary cell structure and function are not well defined. In this study, we evaluated the influence of specific bacterial virulence factors on proliferation of a bovine mammary epithelial cell line. The MAC-T cells were cultured in the presence of medium only, Staphylococcus aureus alpha-toxin, Staph. aureus beta-toxin, Escherichia coli endotoxin, Streptococcus uberis capsule, or hyaluronidase. Cells were cultured in the presence of virulence factors for 48 h at 37 degrees C. The MAC-T cell proliferation was inhibited by all concentrations of endotoxin and alpha-toxin and by most concentrations of hyaluronic acid capsule and hyaluronidase > 7.8 micrograms/ml. Staphylococcus aureus beta-toxin had no effect on MAC-T cell proliferation. Virulence factors produced by mastitis pathogens may influence mammary epithelial cell proliferation in vivo, which could be important during the periparturient period, when mammary tissue undergoes rapid differentiation and growth.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2005

[Advances in Detection Technologies of in vivo Expression of Bacterial Virulence Gene.].

The interactions between bacterial pathogens and their hosts is complex. To further our understanding ofathe pathogenesisaof bacterial pathogens, it is necessary to identify bacterial virulence genes that are specifically induced in vivo during infection and probe their regulation in vivo. Toward this end, several technologies, such as in vivo expression technology (IVET), signature-tagged mutagenesis (STM), differential fluorescence induction (DFI), genomic analysis and mapping by in vitro transposition (GAMBIT) and in vivo induced antigen technology (IVIAT), have been developed. The purpose of this reviewais to update the reader on the many advances of these technologies, and to discuss their advantages and disadvantages.

Genes, Bacterial↗

PubMed2001

Bacterial virulence: can we draw the line?

The molecular approach to microbial pathogenesis has resulted in an impressive amount of data on bacterial virulence genes. Bacterial genome sequences rapidly add candidate virulence genes to electronic databases. The interpretation of this overwhelming information is obscured because every gene involved in pathogenicity is called a virulence gene, regardless of its function in the complex process of virulence. This review summarizes the changing concept of bacterial virulence and the detection and identification strategies followed to recognize virulence genes. A refined definition of virulence genes is proposed in which the function of the gene in the virulence process is incorporated. We propose to include the life-style of bacteria in the assessment of their putative virulence genes. A universal nomenclature in analogy to the EC enzyme numbering system is proposed. These recommendations would lead to a better insight into bacterial virulence and a more precise annotation of (putative) virulence genes, which would enable more efficient use of electronic databases.

Bacteria↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Bacterial virulence and pathogenesis: an overview.

Bacterial virulence is the result of many different attributes, which often contribute to different steps in the complicated series of events we recognize as infection. With the use of selected examples, an overview of the stages of infection common to many bacterial infections (attachment, proliferation, tissue damage, invasion, and dissemination) is presented. Expression of virulence depends on a large number of host variables, including nonspecific and specific immune defenses, and interruption of the process of infection is undoubtedly possible at many different steps. Future developments will depend on better definition of the biochemistry, genetics, and immunology of the bacterial factors involved in pathogenesis.

Adhesiveness↗

PubMed1989

Coordinate regulation and sensory transduction in the control of bacterial virulence.

Genes and operons that encode bacterial virulence factors are often subject to coordinate regulation. These regulatory systems are capable of responding to various environmental signals that may be encountered during the infectious cycle. For some pathogens, proteins that mediate sensory transduction and virulence control are similar to components of other bacterial information processing systems. Understanding the molecular mechanisms governing global regulation of pathogenicity is essential for understanding bacterial infectious diseases.

Bacteria↗

PubMed1995

A role for bacteriophages in the evolution and transfer of bacterial virulence determinants.

A virulence-associated region in the genome of Dichelobacter nodosus has been shown to contain an integrase gene which is highly related to the integrases of Shigella flexneri phage Sf6 and coliphages P4 and phi R73, together with open reading frames (vapB, C and D) related to genes borne on plasmids in Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Escherichia coli, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Treponema denticola. Similar to P4 and phi R73, the vap region is bracketed by putative bacteriophage att sites and is adjacent to a tRNA gene, which suggests that the vap region has been derived by the integration of a bacteriophage, or a plasmid carrying a bacteriophage-related integrase gene. Many similarities in genes and genes clusters encoding virulence determinants have been found in distantly related bacteria. These genes are often located on plasmids in one organism but on the chromosome in others, implying that transmission of the genes has been followed by integration. Thus, the events which have generated the vap regions of D. nodosus may represent a common mechanism for transfer of virulence determinants. A number of genes involved in the virulence of bacterial pathogens are found on integrated bacteriophages, and we suggest that others will prove to be associated with tRNA genes and/or integrase genes derived from bacteriophages. The use of tRNA genes as integration sites for many bacteriophages and plasmids may favour intergeneric transmission, as tRNA genes are highly conserved.

Attachment Sites, Microbiological↗

PubMed2004

[Strategies for bacterial virulence genes identification].

One of the recent preoccupations of medical microbiology has been to characterise the mechanisms of virulence of bacterial pathogens at the molecular level. One hundred years after Koch, Stanley Falkow proposed a new, molecular version of Koch's postulates to define avirulence gene: (a) the gene confers a certain phenotype to the studied bacteria, (b) inactivation of the gene abolishes the phenotype, (c)reintroduction of the gene restores the wild type to the mutant. Although this strategy, based upon mutagenesis and the use of experimental models, allows the identification of many genes, it is not comprehensive. Other methods can be used to complete the identification of virulence factors such as differential expression, either at the level of transcription (transcriptome) or at the level of protein expression (proteome). All these techniques are now supported by the data from complete genome sequencing projects. The pool of information obtained from these approaches allows the definition of the 'virulome', which is the assembly of factors a pathogen requires for virulence. Understanding the virulome will open the way to the development of new strategies for vaccination or the development of new generation of antimicrobials.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Targeting bacterial virulence: inhibitors of type III secretion in Yersinia.

Agents that target bacterial virulence without detrimental effect on bacterial growth are useful chemical probes for studies of virulence and potential candidates for drug development. Several gram-negative pathogens employ type III secretion to evade the innate immune response of the host. Screening of a chemical library with a luciferase reporter gene assay in viable Yersinia pseudotuberculosis furnished several compounds that inhibit the reporter gene signal expressed from the yopE promoter and effector protein secretion at concentrations with no or modest effect on bacterial growth. The selectivity patterns observed for inhibition of various reporter gene strains indicate that the compounds target the type III secretion machinery at different levels. Identification of this set of inhibitors illustrates the approach of utilizing cell-based assays to identify compounds that affect complex bacterial virulence systems.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed2005

Alternative sigma factors and their roles in bacterial virulence.

Sigma factors provide promoter recognition specificity to RNA polymerase holoenzyme, contribute to DNA strand separation, and then dissociate from the core enzyme following transcription initiation. As the regulon of a single sigma factor can be composed of hundreds of genes, sigma factors can provide effective mechanisms for simultaneously regulating expression of large numbers of prokaryotic genes. One newly emerging field is identification of the specific roles of alternative sigma factors in regulating expression of virulence genes and virulence-associated genes in bacterial pathogens. Virulence genes encode proteins whose functions are essential for the bacterium to effectively establish an infection in a host organism. In contrast, virulence-associated genes can contribute to bacterial survival in the environment and therefore may enhance the capacity of the bacterium to spread to new individuals or to survive passage through a host organism. As alternative sigma factors have been shown to regulate expression of both virulence and virulence-associated genes, these proteins can contribute both directly and indirectly to bacterial virulence. Sigma factors are classified into two structurally unrelated families, the sigma70 and the sigma54 families. The sigma70 family includes primary sigma factors (e.g., Bacillus subtilis sigma(A)) as well as related alternative sigma factors; sigma54 forms a distinct subfamily of sigma factors referred to as sigma(N) in almost all species for which these proteins have been characterized to date. We present several examples of alternative sigma factors that have been shown to contribute to virulence in at least one organism. For each sigma factor, when applicable, examples are drawn from multiple species.

Gram-Negative Bacteria↗

PubMed2005

Exposure to host resistance mechanisms drives evolution of bacterial virulence in plants.

Bacterial pathogenicity to plants and animals has evolved through an arms race of attack and defense. Key players are bacterial effector proteins, which are delivered through the type III secretion system and suppress basal defenses . In plants, varietal resistance to disease is based on recognition of effectors by the products of resistance (R) genes . When recognized, the effector or in this scenario, avirulence (Avr) protein triggers the hypersensitive resistance reaction (HR), which generates antimicrobial conditions . Unfortunately, such gene-for-gene-based resistance commonly fails because of the emergence of virulent strains of the pathogen that no longer trigger the HR . We have followed the emergence of a new virulent pathotype of the halo-blight pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola within leaves of a resistant variety of bean. Exposure to the HR led to the selection of strains lacking the avirulence (effector) gene avrPphB (or hopAR1), which triggers defense in varieties with the matching R3 resistance gene. Loss of avrPphB was through deletion of a 106 kb genomic island (PPHGI-1) that shares features with integrative and conjugative elements (ICElands) and also pathogenicity islands (PAIs) in diverse bacteria . We provide a molecular explanation of how exposure to resistance mechanisms in plants drives the evolution of new virulent forms of pathogens.

Bacterial Proteins↗

PubMedDate not supplied

A novel family of channel-forming, autotransporting, bacterial virulence factors.

Pathogenic bacteria produce virulence factors that cross the bacterial cell envelope from the cytoplasm to the extracellular milieu where they promote disease. The mechanisms of their export are poorly understood. We here characterize a family of autotransporter (AT) protein domains present at the C-termini of several nonhomologous Gram-negative bacterial virulence factors. The family consist of 18 sequenced protein domains, the functionally characterized members of which catalyze export of (1) proteases, (2) virulence-related cell adhesins, (3) mediators of actin-promoted bacterial motility, (4) cytotoxins and (5) tissue invasion proteins. We (1) establish that these AT domains are homologous, (2) multiply align their sequences, (3) derive an AT family-specific signature sequence, and (4) define the evolutionary relationships between members of the family. Secondary structural predictions as well as average hydropathy, average similarity and average amphipathicity plots have allowed us to propose a specific 14 beta-stranded barrel structural model that may be applicable to all protein members of the AT family. We suggest that the AT domains became associated with active virulence factor domains by interdomain fusion events that occurred during the evolution of these complex proteins.

Adhesins, Bacterial↗

PubMed1990

[Detection of bacterial virulence factors].

Several newly developed methods, including immunological and DNA hybridization techniques, have been recently introduced in clinical diagnosis. Target molecules for these detection methods are either avirulent materials or virulence factors specific to the individual causative pathogen. Examples requiring the detection of bacterial virulence factors for the accurate identification of causative agents are increasing; for example differentiation of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli from nonpathogenic E. coli, and identification of cholera toxin-producing (or non-producing) V. cholerae 01. Recent progress in the detection of virulence factors is described. Advantages and disadvantages of various detection methods of bacterial virulence factors are also discussed.

Bacteria↗