SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Physically handicapped individuals and the elderly have for too long been denied access to public facilities and transportation systems. Barrier free access is a fundamental guarantee necessary for all handicapped and elderly if they are to become and remain contributing members of our society. A review is provided of legislation, constitutional theories, and current litigation within the context of providing a barrier free environment.
Much confusion arises in the field of agonist-effector supersensitivity phenomena due to the often encountered lack of discrimination between agonist disposition mechanisms functioning, in the system under study, as access barriers and as terminating mechanisms. Access barriers limit agonist approach to the receptor region and terminating mechanisms serve to remove agonist from the site of action. The assumption of a quantitative identity in these two functions is not often warranted and the effects inhibition of these processes have on the magnitude of effector responses and on their duration can differ strikingly, both qualitatively and quantitatively.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Traditional in-person consultations for genetic services create access barriers. We hypothesized that the Genetics Adviser platform-a web-based digital platform delivering clinical genomic services-could reduce these barriers. Focusing on pretest education and counseling, we tested a pilot version of the platform in medical genetics and pediatric endocrinology group practices. The multimethod design consisted of quantitative patient and caregiver surveys, Google Analytics data, and qualitative healthcare provider interviews. Surveys included validated measures of acceptability and empowerment. Transcribed interviews were thematically coded and analyzed using NVivo. Of the 102 patients and caregivers targeted for this study, 85/102 (83%) accessed the platform, 71/102 (70%) proceeded beyond the landing page, and 60/102 (59%) completed the post-module survey. Users expressed high confidence in genetic understanding and empowerment (Genomics Outcome Scale [GOS]: 77/100), and providers noted potential benefits and highlighted technological and content-related limitations. Further research is needed to validate effectiveness across diverse populations and to evaluate long-term impacts on patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency.
Approx. 40-50% of the cytochrome b in purified Complex III is reduced by ascorbate plus N,N,N',N'-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine or phenazine methosulfate at neutral pH. The remaining cytochrome b, including cytochrome b-565, is reduced by increasing the pH. The apparent pK for this reduction is between pH 10 and 11, and is more than two pH units higher than a similar alkali-induced transition in Mg-ATP particles. Alkali-induced reduction of cytochrome b occurs concomitantly with the exposure of hydrophobic tyrosine and tryptophan residues to a more hydrophilic environment. The relationship of these findings to the presence of a substrate accessibility barrier in Complex III is discussed.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Early screening for developmental concerns enables timely diagnosis and referral, yet many families face barriers accessing services. Prior work showed that early childhood care coordination could improve timely service connection. This study assessed developmental outcomes among children participating in a randomized controlled trial of Information and Referral Federation of Los Angeles County (211LA). METHODS: Participants, aged 21-42 months, were randomized to usual care or the 211LA intervention. Developmental and behavioral measures, including the Parental Evaluation of Developmental Status Developmental Milestones Assessment Level (PEDS-DM-AL) and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), were collected at baseline and 24 months later. The sample included 499 participants, 250 in the 211LA intervention and 249 in usual care. Primary analyses examined changes in PEDS-DM-AL and CBCL scores over the 24-month period by study arm. Post hoc analyses compared family characteristics between intervention and control families who enrolled in services. RESULTS: Developmental and behavioral measures showed some clinically insignificant change over time, but these changes did not differ by condition (expressive/receptive language skills mastered: P > .9; autism, attention, aggression, and externalizing behavior T scores: P > .4). Post hoc analyses identified potentially relevant imbalances between the treatment arms at baseline as well as in the subgroup that enrolled in services, with families assigned to the 211LA intervention being more likely to have a non-US born parent and a parent with limited English proficiency compared with families assigned to usual care. Intervention families enrolled in services also used telehealth more frequently and received a lower duration of services than those receiving usual care. CONCLUSIONS: This study measured the indirect influence of service enrollment through 211LA care coordination on developmental outcomes. Although increased service enrollment through 211LA did not affect developmental outcomes, we hypothesize this may be because of several factors, including overrepresentation of a subset of historically underrepresented families in the 211LA intervention, suboptimal performance of our developmental assessment tool, and complexity of conducting a trial of this magnitude during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have diminished the ability of this trial to demonstrate developmental benefits despite demonstrated service enrollment gains.
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV has been available in France since 2014, and reimbursed since 2016, with general practitioners allowed to prescribe it since 2021. Despite these policy advances, uptake remains low among some of the most affected populations. This community-based qualitative study explored barriers to PrEP access and retention ten years into its implementation.Interviews were conducted with 28 PrEP frontline actors (healthcare professionals and community-based workers involved in promoting, prescribing, or supporting PrEP). The sample included one group discussion (n = 5), two triads (n = 6), two dyads (n = 4), and nine individual interviews (n = 13). Thematic analysis was inductive, with barriers classified across four main domains.Participants were mostly cisgender men, median age 48, born in France and abroad, and employed by NGOs in Paris. Thirteen barriers and four major themes emerged: (1) Internal psychosocial barriers: lack of knowledge, negative health-related reactions; HIV stigma; STI risk perception, taboos; (2) Internal pragmatic barriers: perceived limits of protection, usage and follow-up constraints; (3) External psychosocial barriers: limited physician knowledge and reluctance; (4) External pragmatic barriers: communication failures; structural constraints, lack of human and financial resources.Findings call for more targeted messaging, simplified care models and provider training. They highlight the need to address social and symbolic dimensions of PrEP, with insights from those supporting users to ensure more equitable implementation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Access to, and experience of, chronic kidney disease (CKD) care is inequitable-with barriers to accessing quality care for marginalised groups. We conducted an exploratory study employing qualitative approaches to understand the factors that influence access to, and experience of, healthcare services for marginalised people with CKD and at risk of CKD. METHODS: An exploratory study employing qualitative approaches was conducted as a cross-sector collaboration between kidney care services and an activist, antiracist community-based research and social justice organisation (Mabadiliko Community Interest Company (CIC)). Two groups were recruited: 1) those with risk factors for CKD or early-stage CKD, and 2) people who presented late to kidney care services. Semi-structured interviews were co-designed with people with lived experience and conducted by Mabadiliko CIC. Thematic analysis was undertaken, with themes refined by participants. RESULTS: Twenty interviews were undertaken with a diverse cohort of participants. Knowledge and awareness of CKD was limited, and compounded by a lack of delivery of accessible, culturally congruent information. Significant barriers to accessing kidney care exist for marginalised people, including people who are from global majority ethnic backgrounds, Disabled people, and/or people experiencing material hardship. These barriers are compounded by interpersonal discrimination and paternalistic power dynamics within healthcare interactions. CONCLUSION: This study captures the experiences of marginalised people at different stages of their journey with CKD, in accessing and engaging with kidney care services. Participants faced a complex array of challenges, highlighting opportunities for multi-level intervention. We outline recommendations to address these issues, co-developed with participants.
PURPOSE: Race, ethnicity, and ancestry (REA) affect the diagnostic utility of genetic testing. In addition to barriers to accessing genetics services, some non-European REA groups experience decreased diagnostic results and increased uncertain results. Exome sequencing (ES) is a unique genetic test because data can be reanalyzed with new information and variants may be reclassified after the original result. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 10,416 clinical ES cases originally analyzed by Ambry Genetics between 2011 and 2021 with reanalysis events through 2023. The relationship between assigned REA group, ES result, reanalysis and reclassification rates, and reanalysis initiators were analyzed with logistic regression. RESULTS: Reanalyses increased the total diagnostic yield from 21.4% to 25.5%. There were no significant differences in reclassification rate among REA groups. However, the African American and Black group (P = 2.8E-07), the Hispanic and Latino group (P = .0022), and the Asian group (P = .033) were significantly less likely to receive provider-initiated reanalysis compared with the White group. CONCLUSION: Although reclassification rates were not found to be associated with REA group, not all REA groups had the same access to ES reanalysis. Laboratory-initiated proactive reanalysis can help reduce disparities in ES diagnostic utility by reducing barriers to accessing reanalysis.
The purpose of the current study was to assess parent perceptions and experiences of genetic testing, as well as barriers for not undergoing testing in a sample of families of children with hearing loss. A 44-item questionnaire, The Parent Perception of Genetic Testing Questionnaire developed by the research study team was administered. Participants were recruited from a pediatric otolaryngology/audiology practice and social media. A total of 146 parents of children with hearing loss participated. Approximately 47.6% of the children in our sample underwent genetic testing, 44.8% did not, and 7.6% of parents were unsure. For those that did not undergo testing, reasons included: unaware (6.2%), not interested (8.9%), cost (8.9%), time (3.4%), fearful of results (2.7%), and never offered (15.1%). For those that did undergo testing, over half of the parents reported that they did not receive counseling before (55.1%) and 41.7% reported they received counseling after the testing. Furthermore, parents were confused about the results with 18.3% reporting they were Very Confused, 28.3% Somewhat Confused, 20% A Little Confused, and 33.3% Not Confused at All about the variant of uncertain or unknown significance. Notably, less than half of parents (43.4%) remembered what they were told about the mode of inheritance. Overall, our study highlighted the low adoption rate of genetic testing and lack of integration into standard of care for otology/audiology practices. Collaboration between hearing healthcare professionals and geneticists is warranted to determine how to reduce barriers to access while improving pre- and post-counseling.
AIM: Family members of patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) face profound emotional, social and practical challenges, yet little is known about how they access psychosocial support. We synthesised the literature on the psychosocial support accessed by family members of patients with DEEs, including evidence-based interventions. METHOD: Four databases were searched. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data, appraised study quality (QualSyst Tool), and determined certainty of evidence (GRADE-CERQual Framework). Data were synthesised using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: 28 papers comprising 27 unique studies were included and methodological quality was high overall (median = 0.91, IQR = 0.85-1.00). Most studies focused on parent experiences; only two included siblings' perspectives. Families reported high psychological needs which were rarely met by psychological support. Clinicians rarely provided adequate information, quality communication or addressed mental health. Families valued respite care, but experienced barriers to access. Peer support was the most common and valued resource. Three studies tested interventions and appeared feasible and acceptable for parents. However, evidence for intervention effectiveness is preliminary and limited to small, uncontrolled pilot studies. INTERPRETATION: Gaps exist in psychosocial support provision for families of patients with DEEs, including insufficient research on siblings' and grandparents' needs, and lack of evidence-based interventions. We propose evidence-informed research and implementation strategies to address these gaps.
BACKGROUND: Rural populations experience persistent inequities in access to palliative care. Existing evidence often describes individual barriers separately, with less attention to how access breaks down across the care pathway or how different service configurations shape access. OBJECTIVES: To synthesise evidence on access to palliative care in rural settings and examine how access barriers, service models, and implementation conditions interact across the care pathway. METHODS: A mixed-methods systematic review using a convergent integrated approach searched nine databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, CNKI, WanFang, SinoMed) from inception to 15 March 2026, supplemented by hand-searching. Eligible studies were primary qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies on access to palliative care for adults in rural or non-urban settings. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Findings were mapped to the Levesque access framework, analysed using the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, and integrated through mixed-methods synthesis, with additional coding of service models. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies were included, of which 26 were conducted in high-income countries and eight in low- and middle-income countries. Service configurations included specialist or hospice-oriented care, generalist or primary-care-oriented care, mixed specialist-generalist models, home-based and caregiver-centred care, nurse-coordinated services, telehealth-supported care, and community or implementation-oriented approaches. Access broke down cumulatively across four interdependent stages: recognition, entry, reach, and use and continuity, with affordability constraining every stage. Recognition was limited by low awareness, poor service visibility, and delayed identification of need. Entry was shaped by stigma, trust, family expectations, and unclear referral processes. Reach was constrained by distance, transport, workforce shortages, limited specialist capacity, and weak infrastructure. Use and continuity were affected by fragmented coordination, weak transitions, unstable follow-up, and reliance on family caregivers. Access problems varied across service configurations. Evidence on service innovations was methodologically less certain, and the overall evidence base remained concentrated in high-income countries. CONCLUSIONS: Access to palliative care in rural settings is best understood as a pathway and service-configuration problem rather than simply a deficit in service availability. Improving access requires earlier recognition, clearer referral routes, stronger specialist-generalist and nursing links, better support for family caregivers, and greater attention to affordability, continuity, and rural settings with limited resources. REGISTRATION: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: CRD420261340783.
BACKGROUND: Comprehensive genomic analyses are increasingly accessible to children, adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with poor prognosis cancers. Challenges and successes of pediatric precision oncology studies from the perspectives of AYA patients, parents and healthcare providers (HCPs) are poorly described. METHODS: Between March 2021 and May 2023, we interviewed AYA patients (12-21 years), parents and HCPs who participated in pediatric precision oncology studies for poor prognosis cancers in British Columbia. Interviews followed an investigator-developed semi-structured topic guide. Data were coded inductively and deductively by one qualitative researcher and one trainee, supported by two additional team members. Analytic themes were established using qualitative thematic analysis. RESULTS: We interviewed 9 AYAs, 10 parents, and 17 HCPs. We identified five analytic themes: importance of clear communication of study information between patients, families and multidisciplinary HCPs; a need to support disclosure, understanding and clinical integration of research results; barriers to accessing innovative therapy and mitigation strategies; approaches to managing parent, patient and HCP hopes and expectations; personal challenges and stressors related to participation. CONCLUSIONS: We highlight unmet needs and offer practical considerations for integrating precision oncology into clinical practice. Considerations include educating and supporting oncologists through genomics results disclosure, increasing engagement with multidisciplinary HCPs, streamlining access to study information and results, coordinating efforts to clinically validate results and access therapies, and establishing real-world outcome data to inform clinical decision-making. Implementation of these strategies will optimize care for patients and families who are navigating poor prognosis cancers.
PURPOSE: Limited evidence evaluates parents' perceptions of their child's clinical genome-scale sequencing (GS) results, particularly among individuals from medically underserved groups. Five Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research consortium studies performed GS in children with suspected genetic conditions with high proportions of individuals from underserved groups to address this evidence gap. METHODS: Parents completed surveys of perceived understanding, personal utility, and test-related distress after GS result disclosure. We assessed outcomes' associations with child- and parent-related factors: child age; type of GS finding; and parent health literacy, numeracy, and education. RESULTS: A total of 1763 parents completed surveys; 83% met "underserved" criteria based on race, ethnicity, and risk factors for barriers to access. We observed high perceived understanding and personal utility and low test-related distress. Outcomes were associated with the type of GS finding; parents of children with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic finding endorsed higher personal utility and more test-related distress than those whose children had a variant of uncertain significance or normal finding. Personal utility was higher in parents who met the criteria for "underserved." CONCLUSION: Our findings shed light on correlates of parents' cognitive and emotional responses to their child's GS findings and emphasize the need for tailored support in disclosure discussions.
PURPOSE: Functional genomics (FG) approaches, such as RNA-seq and proteomics, offer a complementary diagnostic modality for individuals whose cases remain unsolved after genomic sequencing. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit of FG for individuals with suspected monogenic disorders relative to manual reanalysis of genomic data at 18 months. METHODS: A decision tree model compared the costs and outcomes of FG and 18-month reanalysis using data from two Australian Undiagnosed Disease Programs. Deterministic and probability sensitivity analysis were performed. RESULTS: With a diagnostic yield of 13%, FG enabled 4 additional diagnoses per 100 individuals tested at an additional cost of $390 (US $240), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $8,550 ($5,313) and an 85% probability of being cost-effective. CONCLUSION: Functional genomics enables timely diagnosis for individuals with suspected monogenic disorders by evaluating the functional impact of variants of uncertain significance, offering an advantage over reanalyzing genomic data at 18 months. Integration into the Australian healthcare system, supported by collaborative networks and secure data-sharing infrastructure, coupled with addressing barriers to accessing funded genomic testing, could lead to an annual net benefit of up to $1.1 million ($0.7 M).
BACKGROUND: The treatment of pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) is evolving as disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) undergo pediatric clinical trials. However, most DMTs remain off-label in children resulting in barriers to access and variability in treatment patterns across jurisdictions. The aim of this study was to describe trends in DMT uptake in POMS in British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: We utilized linked clinical and administrative datasets to identify MS with onset <18 years-of-age and assess DMT uptake from dispensed prescriptions between January 1, 1996 and March 1, 2020 in British Columbia, Canada. RESULTS: Of 173 POMS cases (median follow-up = 11.5 years), 32 (18%) filled a DMT prescription <18 years-of-age; 76 (44%) did so at any age. Moderate-efficacy therapies (beta-interferons/glatiramer acetate/teriflunomide/dimethyl fumarate) were the initial DMT in 60 cases (79%) overall, however by the end of follow-up a high-efficacy therapy was the most recent DMT dispensed for 52/76 cases (68%). After 2016, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies became the most common DMT class dispensed. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-efficacy therapies were the more common initial DMT dispensed for individuals with POMS, but more than two-thirds eventually received a high-efficacy therapy. Only a minority of POMS cases were first dispensed a DMT under age 18 years.