PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “benchmark dose analysis”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Identification of a critical dose level for risk assessment: developments in benchmark dose analysis of continuous endpoints.

The benchmark dose (BMD) method has been recommended to replace the no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) approach in health risk assessment of chemical substances. In the present article, developments in BMD analysis from continuous experimental data are proposed. The suggested approach defines the BMD as the dose at which the slope of the S-shaped dose-response relationship changes the most in the low-dose region. This dose resides in a region where the sensitivity to chemical exposure may start to change noticeably. It is shown that the response (defined as a percent change relative to the magnitude, or size, of response) corresponding to the dose where the slope changes the most depends on the geometrical shape of the dose-response curve; the response becomes lower as the curve becomes more asymmetrical and threshold-like in the low-dose region. Given a symmetrical case, described by the Hill function, the response associated with the critical dose level becomes 21% (defined as a percent change relative to the magnitude, or size, of response). According to a limiting case of asymmetry and threshold-like characteristics, reflected by a Gompertz curve, the response corresponding to the dose of interest becomes as low as 7.3% (defined as a percent change relative to the magnitude, or size, of response). Use of a response in the range of 5-10% when estimating the BMD conservatively accounts for uncertainties associated with the proposed strategy, and may be appropriate in a risk assessment point of view. The present investigation also indicated that a BMD defined according to the suggested procedure may be estimated more precisely relative to BMDs defined under other approaches for continuous data.

Animals↗

A benchmark dose analysis of prenatal exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls.

Benchmark dose (BMD) analysis is used to determine levels of exposure to environmental contaminants associated with increased public health risk. In this study we used a benchmark approach to evaluate the risks associated with prenatal exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). We evaluated for intellectual impairment a cohort of children whose prenatal PCB exposure had been assessed from biologic specimens. We calculated BMDs and lower-bound confidence limits (BMDLs) for four end points using four sets of risk criteria. BMDLs were estimated using three different statistical methodologies. The BMDs and BMDLs were remarkably consistent across the four end points for each set of risk criteria, but differed substantially for the different risk criteria. The proportion of the sample considered at risk ranged from 9.8% for the least protective criteria to 74.1% for the most protective. Two methodologies, likelihood ratio and bootstrapping, generated generally similar BMDLs. BMD analysis provides a straightforward, reliable method for evaluating levels of exposure associated with increased public health risk. In the analyses performed in this study, the number of individuals considered at risk depended more on the risk criterion selected than on the outcome assessed.

Adult↗

A benchmark dose analysis for sodium monofluoroacetate (1080) using dichotomous toxicity data.

The use of a benchmark dose (BMD) as an alternative to a no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) approach was investigated as a means to improve current risk assessment values of sodium monofluoroacetate (1080). The feasibility of implementing the two approaches was investigated for three critical toxicological end points, namely cardiomyopathy, testicular toxicity and teratogenic effects identified from the few available critical studies. The BMD provides better representation of the dose-response relationship, offering an advantage over the current NOAEL approach. The calculated BMDs and lower-bound confidence limits (BMDLs) for the three end points were estimated using the Weibull, probit and quantal linear models for each end point. All models passed the chi2 test statistics (p > or = 0.1) for all three toxicity endpoints tested. A benchmark response (BMR) of 10% (extra risk) was chosen and the Akaike's information criterion (AIC) was used in selecting the appropriate model. The BMDL estimates derived were found to be generally slightly higher but comparable to the NOAEL for those same endpoints. The BMD(10) and BMDL(10) for cardiomyopathy and testicular effects were 0.21 mgkg(-1) bw and 0.10 mgkg(-1) bw, respectively. These values are proposed for use in the eventual determination of the tolerable daily intake (TDI) for 1080.

Abnormalities, Drug-Induced↗

Bacterial lipopolysaccharide exposure alters aflatoxin B(1) hepatotoxicity: benchmark dose analysis for markers of liver injury.

Aflatoxin B(1) (AFB(1)) is a fungal toxin that causes both acute hepatotoxicity and hepatocellular carcinoma in humans and experimental animals. Previous studies demonstrated that a small, noninjurious dose of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) augments the hepatotoxicity of AFB(1) through activation of inflammatory cells and production of soluble inflammatory mediators (Barton et al., 2000b, 2001). This study was conducted to examine the effect of LPS on the dose-response relationship for AFB(1)-induced liver injury. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (250-350g) were treated with AFB(1) (0.1 mg/kg-6.3 mg/kg, ip) and 4 h later with a noninjurious dose of E. coli LPS (7.4 x 10(6) EU/kg, iv). Twenty-four h after AFB(1) administration, hepatic parenchymal cell injury was estimated from elevations in serum alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase activities. Injury to intrahepatic bile ducts was evaluated from increased serum gamma-glutamyl transferase and alkaline phosphatase activities. Based on benchmark dose (BMD) analysis, the AFB(1) BMD for parenchymal cell injury was decreased 10-fold by LPS cotreatment, whereas AFB(1) BMDs for bile duct injury were decreased nearly 20-fold. The data suggest that concurrent inflammation renders the liver considerably more sensitive to the hepatotoxic effects of AFB(1).

Aflatoxin B1↗

Benchmark dose analysis of developmental toxicity in rats exposed to boric acid.

Developmental toxicity risk assessment has typically relied on the estimation of reference doses or reference concentrations based on the use of no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) divided by uncertainty factors. The benchmark dose (BMD) approach has been proposed as an alternative basis for reference value calculations. In this analysis of the developmental toxicity observed in rats exposed to boric acid in their diet, BMD analyses have been conducted using two existing studies. By considering various end points (rib XIII effects, variations of the first lumbar rib, and fetal weight changes) and various modeling approaches for those end points, the best approach for incorporating all of the information available from those studies could be determined. Particular emphasis has been placed on methods for combining data across studies and for combining potentially related effects (on rib XIII and on the first lumbar rib). The issues of study and end point selection are ones that will arise frequently in the process of estimating reference values. This example of boric acid suggests that the BMD approach provides a reasonable basis for appropriately comparing and combining study data, as opposed to ad hoc combinations of study results. Moreover, it is shown that the BMD approach can be used with combinations of end points considered to differ in severity. In this case, the preferred approach involved combining the data from the two studies, which were similarly designed and were conducted in the same laboratory, to calculate BMDs that were more accurate and more precise than those that could be derived from either study alone. It was determined that decreased fetal body weight provided the best basis for BMD calculations; BMDs calculated for fetal body weight changes were less than those for all other relevant end points. The appropriate BMD to use as the basis for boric acid reference dose calculation appears to be 59 mg/kg/day, which is very similar to the NOAEL observed in the second of the two studies (55 mg/kg/day). Although the first study failed to establish a NOAEL, the BMD approach could have been applied to that study, thereby avoiding the need for a repeat study. Similar BMD results were obtained in both studies.

Animals↗

The US EPA reference dose for methylmercury: sources of uncertainty.

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) derived a reference dose for methylmercury in 2001, based on an extensive analysis by the National Research Council (NRC) of the National Academy of Sciences. The NRC performed benchmark dose analysis on a number of endpoints from three longitudinal prospective studies: the Seychelles Islands, the Faroe Islands, and the New Zealand studies. Adverse effects were reported in the latter two studies, but not in the Seychelles study. The NRC also performed an integrative analysis of all three studies. Dose conversion from cord blood or maternal hair mercury concentration was performed by EPA using a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model. A total uncertainty factor of 10 was applied for intrahuman pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability. There are numerous decisions made by the NRC/EPA that could greatly affect the value of the reference dose (RfD). Some of these include the choice of a linear model for the relationship between mercury body burden and neuropsychological performance, the choice of values of P0 and the benchmark response, the use of the "critical study/critical endpoint" approach in the interpretation of the maternal body burden that corresponds to the RfD, the use of central tendencies in a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model rather than the inclusion of the distributions of variables for the population of reproductive-age women, the assumption of unity for the ratio of fetal cord blood to maternal blood methylmercury concentrations, the choice of a total of 10 as an uncertainty factor, and the lack of dose-response analysis for other health effects such as cardiovascular disease. In addition, it may be argued that derivation of a RfD for methylmercury is inappropriate, given that there does not appear to be a threshold for adverse neuropsychological effects based on available data.

Adult↗

Determination of an occupational exposure guideline for manganese using the benchmark method.

An occupational risk assessment for manganese (Mn) was performed based on benchmark dose analysis of data from two epidemiological studies providing dose-response information regarding the potential neurological effects of exposure to airborne Mn below the current Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Permissible Exposure Level (PEL) of 5 mg Mn/m3. Based on a review of the scientific evidence regarding the toxicity of Mn, it was determined that the most appropriate measure of exposure to airborne Mn for the subclinical effects measured in these studies is recent (rather than historical or cumulative) concentration of Mn in respirable (rather than total) particulate. For each of the studies analyzed, the individual exposure and response data from the original study had been made available by the investigators. From these two studies benchmark concentrations calculated for eight endpoints ranged from 0.09 to 0.27 mg Mn/m3. From our evaluation of these results, and considering the fact that the subtle, subclinical effects represented by the neurological endpoints tested in these studies do not represent material impairment, we believe an appropriate occupational exposure guideline for manganese would be in the range of 0.1 to 0.3 mg Mn/m3, based on the respirable particulate fraction only, and expressed as an 8-hour time-weighted average.

Air Pollutants, Occupational↗

Promotion of noise-induced hearing loss by chemical contaminants.

Recent studies have underscored the ability of a wide range of chemical agents to potentate noise-induced hearing loss. Given the ubiquitous nature of noise exposure particularly in many work settings, the high rate of noise-induced hearing loss, the limited degree to which auditory function can recover following damage to the inner ear, and the disparate chemical structures that appear capable of impairing hearing, this issue appears to have great public health significance. A compendium of chemicals known to potentiate noise induced hearing loss is presented along with a hypothesis that might explain at least one basis for potentiation of noise-induced hearing loss by certain chemical toxicants. The use of benchmark dose analysis to undertake a risk assessment for promotion of noise-induced hearing loss by both carbon monoxide and hydrogen cyanide is described.

Auditory Threshold↗

Effects of short-term in vivo exposure to polybrominated diphenyl ethers on thyroid hormones and hepatic enzyme activities in weanling rats.

Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), used as flame retardants, are ubiquitous environmental contaminants. PBDEs act as endocrine disruptors via alterations in thyroid hormone homeostasis. We examined thyroid hormone concentrations and hepatic enzyme activity in weanling rats exposed to three commercial PBDE mixtures: DE-71, DE-79, and DE-83R. Female Long-Evans rats, 28 days old, were orally administered various doses of DE-71, DE-79, or DE-83R for 4 days. Serum and liver samples were collected 24 h after the last dose and analyzed for serum total thyroxine (T(4)), triiodothyronine (T(3)), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), hepatic microsomal ethoxy- and pentoxy-resorufin-O-deethylase (EROD and PROD), and uridinediphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase (UDPGT) activities. The PBDE-treated groups did not exhibit significant changes in body weight; however, increased liver weights, as well as 10- to 20-fold induction in EROD and 30- to 40-fold induction in PROD were found in the DE-71-- and DE-79--treated animals. DE-71 and DE-79 caused dose-dependent depletion of T(4), accompanied by up to 3- to 4-fold induction in UDPGT activities. Serum total T(4) was decreased a maximum of 80% for DE-71 and 70% for DE-79 in the highest dose, with benchmark doses (BMDs) of approximately 12.74 mg/kg/day for DE-71 and 9.25 mg/kg/day for DE-79. Dose-related effects in serum T(3) levels were less apparent, with maximal reductions of 25-30% at the highest dose for both DE-71 and DE-79. The two mixtures showed no effect on serum TSH levels. Benchmark dose analysis revealed that the two mixtures were comparable in altering thyroid hormone levels and hepatic enzyme activity. DE-83R was not effective in altering any of the measured parameters. The present study suggests that short-term exposure to some commercial PBDE mixtures interferes with the thyroid hormone system via upregulation of UDPGTS:

Animals↗

Subchronic toxicity of ethylene glycol in Wistar and F-344 rats related to metabolism and clearance of metabolites.

Ethylene glycol (CAS RN 107-21-1) can cause kidney toxicity via the formation of calcium oxalate crystals in a variety of species, including humans. Numerous repeated dose studies conducted in rats have indicated that male rats are more susceptible than female rats. Furthermore, subchronic and chronic studies using different dietary exposure regimens have indicated that male Wistar rats may be more sensitive to renal toxicity than male Fischer-344 (F-344) rats. This study was conducted to compare the toxicity of ethylene glycol in the two strains of rats under identical exposure conditions and to evaluate the potential contribution of toxicokinetic differences to strain sensitivity. Ethylene glycol was mixed in the diet at concentrations to deliver constant target dosage levels of 0, 50, 150, 500, or 1000 mg/kg/day for 16 weeks to groups of 10 male Wistar and 10 male F-344 rats based on weekly group mean body weights and feed consumption. Kidneys were examined histologically for calcium oxalate crystals and pathology. Samples of blood, urine, and kidneys from satellite animals exposed to 0, 150, 500, or 1000 mg/kg/day for 1 or 16 weeks were analyzed for ethylene glycol, glycolic acid, and oxalic acid. Treatment of Wistar rats at 1000 mg/kg/day resulted in the death of two rats; in addition, at 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day, group mean body weights were decreased compared to control throughout the 16 weeks. In F-344 rats exposed at 1000 mg/kg/day and in Wistar rats receiving 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day, there were lower urine specific gravities, higher urine volumes, and increased absolute and relative kidney weights. In both strains of rats treated at 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day, some or all treated animals had increased calcium oxalate crystals in the kidney tubules and crystal nephropathy. The effect was more severe in Wistar rats than in F-344 rats. Accumulation of oxalic acid in the kidneys of both strains of rats was consistent with the dose-dependent and strain-dependent toxicity. As the nephrotoxicity progressed over the 16 weeks, the clearance of ethylene glycol and its metabolites decreased, exacerbating the toxicity. Benchmark dose analysis indicated a BMDL05 for kidney toxicity in Wistar rats of 71.5 mg/kg/day; nearly fourfold lower than in F-344 rats (285 mg/kg/day). This study confirms that the Wistar rat is more sensitive to ethylene glycol-induced renal toxicity than the F-344 rat and indicates that metabolism or clearance plays a role in the strain differences.

Animals↗

Use of benchmark dose and meta-analysis to determine the most sensitive endpoint for risk assessment for dimethoate.

A meta-analysis of several rat toxicity studies for dimethoate was conducted to determine the most sensitive endpoint for use in risk assessment. The analysis was motivated by a recent developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) study, which identified the same no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for pup mortality and cholinesterase inhibition. The pup mortality NOAEL was lower than that determined in a range-finding study for the DNT and other reproduction studies, and was highly influenced by a single total litter loss in the middle dose group, which made interpretation difficult. First, a meta-analysis was conducted of four recent studies by gavage dosing with very similar designs, including the DNT. Benchmark dose (BMD) modeling was used to determine the appropriate point of departure for regulatory purposes, the lower limit of the BMD for a 5% incidence for pup mortality (BMDL(5)) and the lower limit of a 10% inhibition of brain cholinesterase (BMDL(10)*), the asterisk denotes that the BMD is based on continuous response variable as opposed to an incidence level. For pup mortality, the BMDL(5) for post-natal days (PND) 1-4 was 0.64 mg/kg/day. For cholinesterase inhibition, the lowest BMDL(10)* was 0.19 mg/kg/day for the dams at gestation day 20. These results show that the regulatory point-of-departure for cholinesterase inhibition is more than threefold lower than pup mortality. Thus, risk assessments protecting against cholinesterase inhibition are likely to also be protective of pup mortality. In addition, cholinesterase inhibition and pup mortality were evaluated in two 2-generation reproduction studies by dietary exposure. Also, cholinesterase inhibition was evaluated in a 28-day dietary study. Dietary exposure is more relevant than gavage exposures for many human risk assessment scenarios. There was no consistent pup mortality at the highest doses of the two 2-generation dietary studies (6.0 and 6.5mg/kg/day). The average BMD(10)s for brain cholinesterase inhibition for the 2-generation studies was 0.65 mg/kg/day, with a range of 0.49--0.96 mg/kg/day. This suggests that cholinesterase inhibition is at least a 10-fold more sensitive endpoint than pup mortality for dietary exposures. For the 28-day dietary study, the BMD(10) for brain cholinesterase inhibition was 1.1mg/kg/day for males and 0.70 mg/kg/day for females. The exposure duration in the 28-day dietary study is closest to the durations in the gavage studies. Compared to the dams in the gavage studies, which had a BMDL(10) of 0.19 mg/kg/day, the animals were more than threefold more sensitive to cholinesterase inhibition by gavage compared to dietary exposure.

Age Factors↗

Benchmark dose risk assessment for formaldehyde using airflow modeling and a single-compartment, DNA-protein cross-link dosimetry model to estimate human equivalent doses.

Formaldehyde induced squamous-cell carcinomas in the nasal passages of F344 rats in two inhalation bioassays at exposure levels of 6 ppm and above. Increases in rates of cell proliferation were measured by T. M. Monticello and colleagues at exposure levels of 0.7 ppm and above in the same tissues from which tumors arose. A risk assessment for formaldehyde was conducted at the CIIT Centers for Health Research, in collaboration with investigators from Toxicological Excellence in Risk Assessment (TERA) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) in 1999. Two methods for dose-response assessment were used: a full biologically based modeling approach and a statistically oriented analysis by benchmark dose (BMD) method. This article presents the later approach, the purpose of which is to combine BMD and pharmacokinetic modeling to estimate human cancer risks from formaldehyde exposure. BMD analysis was used to identify points of departure (exposure levels) for low-dose extrapolation in rats for both tumor and the cell proliferation endpoints. The benchmark concentrations for induced cell proliferation were lower than for tumors. These concentrations were extrapolated to humans using two mechanistic models. One model used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) alone to determine rates of delivery of inhaled formaldehyde to the nasal lining. The second model combined the CFD method with a pharmacokinetic model to predict tissue dose with formaldehyde-induced DNA-protein cross-links (DPX) as a dose metric. Both extrapolation methods gave similar results, and the predicted cancer risk in humans at low exposure levels was found to be similar to that from a risk assessment conducted by the U.S. EPA in 1991. Use of the mechanistically based extrapolation models lends greater certainty to these risk estimates than previous approaches and also identifies the uncertainty in the measured dose-response relationship for cell proliferation at low exposure levels, the dose-response relationship for DPX in monkeys, and the choice between linear and nonlinear methods of extrapolation as key remaining sources of uncertainty.

Administration, Inhalation↗

A health risk benchmark for the neurologic effects of styrene: comparison with NOAEL/LOAEL approach.

Benchmark dose (BMD) analysis was used to estimate an inhalation benchmark concentration for styrene neurotoxicity. Quantal data on neuropsychologic test results from styrene-exposed workers [Mutti et al. (1984). American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 5, 275-286] were used to quantify neurotoxicity, defined as the percent of tested workers who responded abnormally to > or = 1, > or = 2, or > or = 3 out of a battery of eight tests. Exposure was based on previously published results on mean urinary mandelic- and phenylglyoxylic acid levels in the workers, converted to air styrene levels (15, 44, 74, or 115 ppm). Nonstyrene-exposed workers from the same region served as a control group. Maximum-likelihood estimates (MLEs) and BMDs at 5 and 10% response levels of the exposed population were obtained from log-normal analysis of the quantal data. The highest MLE was 9 ppm (BMD = 4 ppm) styrene and represents abnormal responses to > or = 3 tests by 10% of the exposed population. The most health-protective MLE was 2 ppm styrene (BMD = 0.3 ppm) and represents abnormal responses to > or = 1 test by 5% of the exposed population. A no observed adverse effect level/lowest observed adverse effect level (NOAEL/LOAEL) analysis of the same quantal data showed workers in all styrene exposure groups responded abnormally to > or = 1, > or = 2, or > or = 3 tests, compared to controls, and the LOAEL was 15 ppm. A comparison of the BMD and NOAEL/LOAEL analyses suggests that at air styrene levels below the LOAEL, a segment of the worker population may be adversely affected. The benchmark approach will be useful for styrene noncancer risk assessment purposes by providing a more accurate estimate of potential risk that should, in turn, help to reduce the uncertainty that is a common problem in setting exposure levels.

Air Pollutants, Occupational↗

Effects of exposure imprecision on estimation of the benchmark dose.

In regression analysis failure to adjust for imprecision in the exposure variable is likely to lead to underestimation of the exposure effect. However, the consequences of exposure error for determination of safe doses of toxic substances have so far not received much attention. The benchmark approach is one of the most widely used methods for development of exposure limits. An important advantage of this approach is that it can be applied to observational data. However, in this type of data, exposure markers are seldom measured without error. It is shown that, if the exposure error is ignored, then the benchmark approach produces results that are biased toward higher and less protective levels. It is therefore important to take exposure measurement error into account when calculating benchmark doses. Methods that allow this adjustment are described and illustrated in data from an epidemiological study on the health effects of prenatal mercury exposure.

Algorithms↗

Benchmark dose calculations for methylmercury-associated delays on evoked potential latencies in two cohorts of children.

Delays in evoked potential latencies were observed at increased exposures to methylmercury from seafood in two cohorts of children. Because this outcome parameter appeared to be virtually independent of confounders, including cultural differences, a joint analysis of benchmark doses was carried out. Comparable cohort members included 382 Faroese and 113 Madeiran children without middle ear infection or neurological disease at age seven years. Maternal hair-mercury concentrations at parturition in the Faroese cohort ranged from 0.6 to 39.1 microg/g (geometric average, 4.49 microg/g). In Madeira, mothers who had not changed their diet since pregnancy had current hair-mercury concentrations ranging from 1.1 to 54.4 microg/g (geometric average 10.14 microg/g). The mercury-associated delay in peak III latencies at two frequencies (20 and 40 Hz) showed similar regression equations in the two groups of children, and benchmark dose calculations were therefore carried out for the two groups separately and jointly. For a doubling of a 5% prevalence of abnormal results of the peak III latencies at 40 Hz in a linear dose-response model, the benchmark dose for the maternal hair-mercury concentration was 8.79 microg/g for the Faroese children; 8.04 microg/g for the Madeiran children; and 9.46 microg/g for both groups. Results were similar for the 20 Hz condition. Benchmark dose results were substantially lower using a logarithmic or square root curve function, although the difference in fit between the curves was far from statistically significant. The benchmark results using evoked potential latencies are in close agreement with results based on neuropsychological test performance.

Adult↗

Dose-response characteristics of uterine responses in rats exposed to estrogen agonists.

Assays for uterine response have played major roles in developing an understanding of estrogen-mediated processes and for identifying compounds with hormonal activity. Data from assays measuring increases in uterine wet weight in rats were evaluated in terms of their dose-response characteristics. Analysis using a Hill equation found inconsistent estimates for the ED50 (concentration giving half-maximal response) and n (steepness of response) among the assays. This variability reflects disparate assay protocols and limitations of the dose-response data collected in the experiments. Although uterine wet weight is easily measured, it arises from several physiological processes (e.g., water retention, cell proliferation). This contributes to the assay variability with different protocols. The potential use of the Hill equation for dose-response analysis to estimate a benchmark dose was also considered using these data sets as surrogates for receptor-mediated toxicological effects. Strengths and weaknesses were identified, but overall the Hill equation should likely become a favored option for determining a benchmark dose, particularly when a data set demonstrates a maximal response. For screening purposes, empirical analysis using the Hill equation provides adequate information for classifying and prioritizing compounds. To develop an understanding of how incremental exposures to compounds with estrogen agonist activities would affect intact adult females, quantitative analyses are required that account for the pharmacokinetics of estradiol and subsequent interactions of the receptor complexes in regulating the responses.

Animals↗

Inhaled formaldehyde: evaluation of sensory irritation in relation to carcinogenicity.

OBJECTIVES: The critical health effects of formaldehyde exposure include sensory irritation and the potential to induce tumours in the upper respiratory tract. In literature, a concentration as low as 0.24 ppm has been reported to be irritating to the respiratory tract in humans. Nasal tumour-inducing levels in experimental animals seem to be 1-2 orders of magnitude larger. In this paper, the subjectively measured sensory irritation threshold levels in humans are discussed in line with findings obtained in animal experiments. In addition, a Benchmark dose (BMD) analysis of sensory irritation was used to estimate response incidences at different formaldehyde concentrations. METHODS: Data on respiratory irritation and carcinogenicity of formaldehyde were retrieved from public literature and discussed. BMD analysis was carried out on human volunteer studies using the US-EPA BMD software. RESULTS: Subjective measures of irritation were the major data found in humans to examine sensory (eye and nasal) irritation; only one study reported objectively measured eye irritation. On a normalized scale, mild/slight eye irritation was observed at levels 1 ppm, and mild/slight respiratory tract irritation at levels 2 ppm. With the BMD software, it was estimated that at a level of 1 ppm, only 9.5% of healthy volunteers experience 'moderate' (i.e., annoying) eye irritation (95% upper confidence limit). An important factor modulating the reported levels of irritation and health symptoms most probably includes the perception of odour intensity. In several studies, the 0-ppm control condition was missing. From the results of the long-term inhalation toxicity studies in experimental animals, a level of 1 ppm formaldehyde has been considered a NOAEL for nasal injury. CONCLUSIONS: Sensory irritation is first observed at levels of 1 ppm and higher. From both human and animal studies, it was concluded that at airborne levels for which the prevalence of sensory irritation is minimal both in incidence and degree (i.e., <1 ppm), risks of respiratory tract cancer are considered to be negligibly low.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Differential Mutagenic Response of Rat Liver and Lung to Nicotine-Derived Nitrosamine Ketone (NNK).

Nitrosamines (NA) are chemical impurities that are present in tobacco, foods, more recently in some pharmaceuticals and are associated with genotoxicity and carcinogenicity. We evaluated the in vivo mutagenicity of nicotine-derived nitrosamine ketone (NNK) or 4-(methyl nitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone, a model compound used as an anchor molecule to estimate carcinogenic potency of unknown nitrosamine impurities. Big Blue rats were treated with NNK at doses ranging from 0.001 to 30 mg/kg for 28 days, following which liver and lung tissue were harvested 3 days later for nuclear genomic DNA isolation. Mutations in liver and lung were assessed with the cII transgene assay and endogenous genomic loci using Duplex Sequencing (DupSeq), a highly validated error-corrected sequencing (ECS) technology. The no genotoxic effect level (NOGEL) was 1 mg/kg in liver and 0.1 mg/kg in lung while the benchmark dose (BMD) analysis for cII mutagenicity determined a BMDL50 of 1.3 mg/kg in liver and 0.12 mg/kg in lung, consistent with lung being the more sensitive target organ for carcinogenicity for NNK. ECS-derived mutagenicity was highly correlated with cII-derived mutagenicity. Interestingly, the types of mutations formed appeared to be tissue-specific with higher C > T transitions and lower T > G transversions in lung compared to liver, differences that may reflect tissue-specific DNA repair capacity and/or metabolic differences. Collectively, these data support the use of in vivo mutagenicity data&#x2500;from both TGR cII and ECS methods&#x2500;for human health and cancer risk characterization of nitrosamines and for estimating acceptable daily intakes for unknown nitrosamine drug substance related impurities.

Animals↗