PubMed HealthSearch

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “cardiovascular (CV) comorbidities”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Embedding cardiovascular risk assessment into routine BTK inhibitor management in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular (CV) toxicities remain a major challenge during Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Selecting the optimal BTKi based solely on a history of overt CV disease may underestimate underlying cardiovascular vulnerability. AREAS COVERED: We performed a targeted, non-systematic review of PubMed and MEDLINE to examine the association between baseline CV comorbidities and BTKi-related CV toxicities in CLL. Current evidence indicates that preferential use of BTKis with more favorable CV safety profiles, coupled with appropriate cardio-oncology surveillance, reduces the risk of CV adverse events in patients with pre-existing CV disease. In patients without established CV disease, the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2) and SCORE2-Older Persons (SCORE2-OP) may help identify clinically meaningful latent CV risk, enabling early optimization of modifiable risk factors in line with the proactive cardiovascular management strategy endorsed by the 2026 European Hematology Association (EHA) CLL guidelines. EXPERT OPINION: A structured, risk-adapted approach integrating standardized CV risk assessment, early management of modifiable risk factors, individualized BTKi selection, and multidisciplinary cardio-oncology collaboration may improve the safety and tolerability of BTKi therapy in CLL. Pending prospective validation, SCORE2 and SCORE2-OP should complement, rather than replace, dedicated cardio-oncology evaluation.

Humans

High-Dose vs Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccine and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Older Adults: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of the DANFLU-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: The high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (HD-IIV) has demonstrated superior protection against laboratory-confirmed influenza infection vs standard-dose IIV (SD-IIV); however, data regarding its effectiveness against cardiovascular (CV) outcomes are mainly from observational studies or specific high-risk groups. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of HD-IIV vs SD-IIV against CV outcomes in the general older adult population in Denmark. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prespecified secondary analysis of DANFLU-2, a pragmatic, open-label, individually randomized clinical trial (RCT) using nationwide administrative health registries in Denmark during the 2022/2023 to 2024/2025 influenza seasons. Older adults (age ≥65 years) were eligible for inclusion regardless of comorbidity. The trial design specified that if the primary end point was neutral, no hypothesis testing would be performed for secondary or exploratory end points. Data were analyzed from June 29 to August 12, 2025. INTERVENTIONS: Individual-level 1:1 randomization to HD-IIV or SD-IIV. Participants re-enrolling in additional seasons were rerandomized. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Severe CV outcomes were prespecified secondary and exploratory end points in the trial, occurring from 14 days after vaccination through May 31 the following year. RESULTS: A total of 332 438 participants (170 900 [51.4%] male; mean [SD] age, 73.7 [5.8] years) were randomized (166 218 to HD-IIV and 166 220 to SD-IIV), of whom 91 026 (27.4%) had a history of CV disease. HD-IIV did not significantly reduce the trial's primary end point of hospitalization for influenza or pneumonia. The incidence of hospitalization for any cardiorespiratory disease was lower in the HD-IIV group than the SD-IIV group (rVE, 5.7% [95% CI, 1.4% to 9.9%]; absolute difference, -0.13 [95% CI, -0.24 to -0.03] percentage points), and rVE did not differ by history of CV disease compared with no CV disease at baseline. Hospitalization for any CV disease occurred in fewer participants in the HD-IIV group than the SD-IIV group (rVE, 7.5% [95% CI, 1.5% to 12.5%]; absolute difference, -0.10 [95% CI, -0.18 to -0.02] percentage points) as did hospitalization for heart failure (rVE, 19.5% [95% CI, 3.3% to 33.1%]; absolute difference, -0.03 [95% CI, -0.06 to -0.01] percentage points). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study found reduced incidence of cardiorespiratory hospitalization among those who received HD-IIV vs SD-IIV, driven by a lower incidence of CV hospitalizations, and particularly heart failure hospitalizations. These differences should be interpreted as exploratory findings in the setting of a large RCT with a neutral primary outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05517174.

Aged