PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “ceftolozane-tazobactam”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

L2 β-lactamase contributes to ceftolozane-tazobactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

The prevalence of non-susceptibility to ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) among Pseudomonas aeruginosa remains low, but novel mechanisms of C/T resistance are of concern. Herein, we describe a novel P. aeruginosa genotype associated with high-level C/T resistance (>256/4 µg/mL) in a single patient. Whole-genome sequencing of the isolate was compared to that of a susceptible isolate cultured from the same patient 2 months earlier. Analysis of the sequences revealed two different P. aeruginosa high-risk clones: sequence type (ST)111 followed by ST235. The C/T-resistant ST235 isolate contained five copies of a genetic element composed of an L2 β-lactamase gene (blaL2) and a truncated ampRL2 transcriptional regulator gene, which are commonly found together in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains and have not been reported to mediate resistance to C/T. Comparative genomic analysis with other P. aeruginosa isolates failed to identify alternative explanations for the observed C/T resistance. We found that exogenous expression of blaL2 increased C/T minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) in genetically distinct P. aeruginosa strains. A screen of our archived isolates identified two P. aeruginosa clinical isolates, PS2045 and PS2046, with one and two copies, respectively, of the genetic element containing blaL2 and truncated ampRL2. Interestingly, disruption of the gene blaL2 but not the truncated ampRL2 in PS2045 led to a decrease in C/T MIC. Thus, we report a novel mechanism of C/T resistance in P. aeruginosa partially mediated by an L2 β-lactamase independently of its canonical regulator, AmpRL2.

bioinformatics↗
PubMed2026

A novel mechanism of ceftolozane-tazobactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa mediated by L2 β-lactamase.

The prevalance of non-susceptibility to ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) among Pseudomonas aeruginosa remains low but novel mechanisms of C/T resistance are of concern. Herein, we describe a novel Pseudomonas aeruginosa genotype associated with high-level C/T resistance (>256/4 μg/mL) in a single patient. Whole genome sequencing of the isolate was compared to that of a susceptible isolate cultured from the same patient two months earlier. Analysis of the sequences revealed two different P. aeruginosa high-risk clones: ST111 followed by ST235. The C/T-resistant ST235 isolate contained five copies of a genetic element comprised of an L2 β-lactamase gene (bla L2) and a truncated ampR L2 transcriptional regulator gene, which are commonly found together in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains and have not been reported to mediate resistance to C/T. Comparative genomic analysis with other P. aeruginosa isolates failed to identify alternative explanations for the observed C/T resistance. We found that exogenous expression of bla L2 modestly increased C/T MICs in genetically distinct P. aeruginosa strains. A screen of our archived isolates identified two P. aeruginosa clinical isolates, PS2045 and PS2046, with one and two copies, respectively, of the genetic element containing bla L2 and truncated ampR L2. Interestingly, disruption of the gene bla L2 but not the truncated ampR L2 in PS2045 led to a significant decrease in C/T MIC. Thus, we report a novel mechanism of C/T resistance in P. aeruginosa mediated by an L2 β-lactamase independently of its canonical regulator AmpR L2.

bioinformatics↗
PubMed2026

Dual β-lactam therapy against high-risk Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates: a dynamic in-vitro infection model study integrating population genomics with quantitative systems pharmacology modelling and simulations.

BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa has an extraordinary capacity for resistance emergence during treatment, even with newer antipseudomonals. There is a gap in understanding how resistance mechanisms affect the time-course of bacterial response to these newer agents. Traditional approaches for predicting pathogen response to an antibiotic do not apply to combination therapy. We aimed to develop a modelling framework to predict treatment response based on resistome information, using isolates of the worldwide-disseminated high-risk clone sequence type (ST) 235 and β-lactam antibiotics as the example. METHODS: In this hollow-fibre in-vitro infection study, we used three extensively drug-resistant ST235 clinical isolates from the national collection of the Clinical Microbiology Department of the Hospital Son Espases (Palma de Mallorca, Spain) that were hospital-acquired, were isolated following routine microbiological procedures from different patients between 2017 and 2022, were susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam, and had different levels of meropenem resistance. The selected isolates (ST235-05, ST235-09, and ST235-10) showed classical β-lactam resistance mechanisms pre-treatment. The isolates were investigated in 240-h dynamic hollow-fibre in-vitro infection models (HFIMs). The studies exposed the isolates to pharmacokinetic profiles of ceftolozane-tazobactam (simulating 1 g of ceftolozane and 0·5 g of tazobactam as a 3-h infusion every 8 h) and meropenem (simulating 6 g per day continuous infusion) as observed in hospitalised patients, as monotherapy and in combination. Treatment response was assessed through the quantification of the time-courses of viable total and resistant bacteria. Whole-genome sequencing identified the mechanisms of emerging resistance. A quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) approach was used to model total and resistant bacterial counts and corresponding pharmacokinetic data from the HFIM. Monte Carlo simulations were used to predict treatment responses in 1000 virtual infected patients treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam and meropenem as monotherapies or in combination over 10 days. FINDINGS: In the HFIMs, each antibiotic alone amplified resistance by approximately 48 h for all isolates; that is, monotherapies resulted in a higher concentration of resistant bacteria compared with the control treatment at the respective time, except ceftolozane-tazobactam against ST235-10. Combination of ceftolozane-tazobactam and meropenem was synergistic (bacterial counts ≥2 log10 colony forming units [CFU] per mL lower than the best performing monotherapy and initial inoculum) against all isolates and suppressed resistance. Against ST235-10, ceftolozane-tazobactam monotherapy reduced counts to less than 1 log10 CFU per mL from 192 h onwards, whereas the combination reached less than 1 log10 CFU per mL by 24 h. Across strains, population genomics confirmed monotherapy failures were associated with emerging resistance mechanisms (ceftolozane-tazobactam: ampC Ω-loop mutations; meropenem: ftsl mutation). The developed QSP model incorporated baseline resistance mechanisms and those emerging in resistant mutant subpopulations. The model explained and predicted the monotherapy failures involving amplification of these subpopulations, and synergistic killing and resistance suppression by the combination. Simulations using the model predicted bacterial regrowth above the initial inoculum for more than 90% of patients after 0 to approximately 3 days for meropenem monotherapy across all strains and for ceftolozane-tazobactam monotherapy against ST235-05 and ST235-09. For ceftolozane-tazobactam monotherapy against ST235-10, regrowth was predicted for approximately 30% of patients. In contrast, the simulations predicted sustained bacterial killing of at least 2 log10 CFU per mL compared with the initial inoculum by the combination for more than 89% of patients across all strains. INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, this model is the first to characterise and predict the time-course of responses of clinical isolates to antibiotics only by the resistance mechanisms present and their complex interplay, representing a step towards pathogen-specific, personalised medicine. FUNDING: Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa↗
PubMed2026

Activity of Aztreonam-avibactam and Ceftazidime-Avibactam against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing infections in patients hospitalized in hematology, oncology, and transplant units from United States medical centres (2019-2024).

Immunosuppression increases the risks and severity of infections and is associated with a higher incidence of infection with multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. We evaluated the antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from patients hospitalized in hospital units where the frequency of immunosuppressed patients is very high. Bacterial isolates were consecutively collected (1/patient) from 75 US medical centres in 2019-2024 and susceptibility tested by broth microdilution. Enterobacterales (n = 2,407) and P. aeruginosa (n = 485) from patients hospitalized in hematology, oncology, and transplant units were evaluated. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) were screened for β-lactamases by whole genome sequencing. Enterobacterales were mainly from bloodstream infection (BSI; 53.6%) and urinary tract infection (19.9%) and P. aeruginosa were mainly from BSI (37.9%) and pneumonia (35.0%). Aztreonam-avibactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam were highly active against Enterobacterales (99.9-99.4% susceptible), including MDR isolates (99.6-98.1% susceptible), but only aztreonam-avibactam exhibited good activity against CRE (95.8% susceptible). Ceftolozane-tazobactam showed good activity against Escherichia coli (95.7% S) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (92.8% S), but limited activity against Enterobacter cloacae species complex (75.9% susceptible). All (100.0%) carbapenemase (CBase)-producing CRE isolates were aztreonam-avibactam-susceptible while 77.4% were ceftazidime-avibactam-susceptible and 67.7% were meropenem-vaborbactam-susceptible. The most common CBases were KPC (41.7%), NDM (12.5%), and OXA-48 types (10.4%). Metallo-β-lactamases represented 23.5% of CBases and were identified in 16.7% of CREs. The most active agents against P. aeruginosa were ceftazidime-avibactam (95.7% susceptible), ceftolozane-tazobactam (94.8% susceptible), and tobramycin (91.5% susceptible). Piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem were active against 81.4% and 82.5% of P. aeruginosa, respectively, and aztreonam-avibactam inhibited 78.6% of P. aeruginosa at ≤8 mg/L.

Humans↗