PubMed HealthSearch

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “centromere”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Complete chromosome 21 centromere sequencing of families with Down syndrome reveals centromere size asymmetry.

Down syndrome, the most common form of human intellectual disability, is caused by nondisjunction and chromosome 21 trisomy (T21). Small centromeres have been hypothesized to contribute to its aetiology and studies on mammals suggest that larger centromeres are more efficiently transmitted, yet complete sequencing of chromosome 21 (chr21) centromeres has been particularly challenging. Using long-read sequencing, we sequenced and assembled the centromeres from eight families that include a child with free T21 (1 trio, 6 child-mother duos, and 1 singleton) all resulting from maternal meiosis I errors. Two of these families carry the smallest chr21 centromeres (143 and 181 kbp) observed in female individuals to date, exhibiting a ~10.7- and ~19.4-fold centromeric α-satellite higher-order repeat array size difference between the maternally inherited homologs, respectively. In both cases, the longer centromere harbors a poorly defined centromere dip region, marked by DNA hypomethylation, in the proband but not in the mother. A comparison of all proband chr21 centromeres (n=24) to those of controls (n=261) shows that small centromeres are not enriched in families with T21 (p-value=0.73); contrarily, chr21 extreme centromere size asymmetry (>10-fold) is unique of T21 (p-value=0.003), suggesting that this feature may represent a genetic risk factor for a subset of families with free T21. Additionally, phylogenetic reconstruction reveals that human chr21 has been particularly prone to such variation with some of the biggest size differences occurring over the last ~17 thousand years of human evolution.

Down syndrome

Analysis of centromere function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using synthetic centromere mutants.

We constructed Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromere DNA mutants by annealing and ligating synthetic oligonucleotides, a novel approach to centromere DNA mutagenesis that allowed us to change only one structural parameter at a time. Using this method, we confirmed that CDE I, II, and III alone are sufficient for centromere function and that A + T-rich sequences in CDE II play important roles in mitosis and meiosis. Analysis of mutants also showed that a bend in the centromere DNA could be important for proper mitotic and meiotic chromosome segregation. In addition we demonstrated that the wild-type orientation of the CDE III sequence, but not the CDE I sequence, is critical for wild-type mitotic segregation. Surprisingly, we found that one mutant centromere affected the segregation of plasmids and chromosomes differently. The implications of these results for centromere function and chromosome structure are discussed.

Base Sequence

Centromere protein B assembles human centromeric alpha-satellite DNA at the 17-bp sequence, CENP-B box.

We purified 15,000-fold from HeLa cell nuclear extract the centromere antigen that reacts specifically with the 17-bp sequence, designated previously as CENP-B box, in human centromeric alpha-satellite (alphoid) DNA by a two-step procedure including an oligonucleotide affinity column. The purified protein was identified as the centromere protein B (CENP-B) by its mobility on SDS-PAGE (80 kD), and reactivities to a monoclonal antibody raised to CENP-B (bacterial fusion protein) and to anticentromere sera from patients with autoimmune diseases. Direct binding by CENP-B of the CENP-B box sequence in the alphoid DNA has been proved using the purified CENP-B by DNA mobility-shift assay, Southwestern blotting, and DNase I protection analysis. The binding constant of the antigen to the CENP-B box sequence is 6 x 10(8) M-1. DNA mobility-shift assays indicated that the major complex formed between the CENP-B and the DNA contains two DNA molecules, suggesting the importance of the CENP-B/CENP-B box interaction in organization of higher ordered chromatin structures in the centromere and/or kinetochore. Location of DNA binding and dimerization domains in CENP-B was discussed based on the DNA mobility-shift assays performed with a protein fraction containing intact and partial cleavage products of CENP-B.

Autoantigens

Lambda CM8, a human sequence with putative centromeric function, does not map to the centromere but is present in one to two copies at 9qter.

A DNA fragment isolated from a human genomic library, was reported to be present at all human centromeres and present at 16-32 copies per genome. Reintroduction of this DNA into mammalian cells as a concatenated phage clone gave rise to dicentric chromosomes which gave rise to a new, stable, chromosome. Taken together these observations could mean that this DNA is part of a native centromere. We have reexamined the location and copy number of this sequence and find it to be present at 1-2 copies per genome with a single site of in situ hybridisation at 9qter.

Blotting, Southern

Distinct evolutionary trajectories of subgenomic centromeres in polyploid wheat.

BACKGROUND: Centromeres are crucial for precise chromosome segregation and maintaining genome stability during cell division. However, their evolutionary dynamics, particularly in polyploid organisms with complex genomic architectures, remain largely enigmatic. Allopolyploid wheat, with its well-defined hierarchical ploidy series and recent polyploidization history, serves as an excellent model to explore centromere evolution. RESULTS: In this study, we perform a systematic comparative analysis of centromeres in common wheat and its corresponding ancestral species, utilizing the latest comprehensive reference genome assembly available. Our findings reveal that wheat centromeres predominantly consist of five types of centromeric-specific retrotransposon elements (CRWs), with CRW1 and CRW2 being the most prevalent. We identify distinct evolutionary trajectories in the functional centromeres of each subgenome, characterized by variations in copy number, insertion age, and CRW composition. By utilizing CENH3-ChIP data across various ploidy levels, we uncover a series of CRW invasion events that have shaped the evolution of AA subgenome centromeres. Conversely, the evolutionary process of the DD subgenome centromeres involves their expansion from diploid to hexaploid wheat, facilitating adaptation to a larger genomic context. Integration of complete einkorn centromere assemblies and Aegilops tauschii pan-genomes further revealed subgenome-specific centromere evolutionary trajectories. By inclusion of synthetic hexaploid from S2-S3 generations, alongside 2x/6 × natural accessions, we demonstrate that DD subgenome centromere expansion represents a gradual evolutionary process rather than an immediate response to polyploidization. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a comprehensive landscape of centromere adaptation, evolution, and maturation, along with insights into how retrotransposon invasions drive centromere evolution in polyploid wheat.

Centromere

Characterization of centromere arrangements and test for random distribution in G0, G1, S, G2, G1, and early S' phase in human lymphocytes.

The arrangement of centromeres, cluster formation and association with the nucleolus and the nuclear membrane were characterized in human lymphocytes during the course of interphase in a cell-phase-dependent manner. We evaluated 3,893 cell nuclei categorized by five parameters. The centromeres were visualized by means of indirect immunofluorescent labeling with anti-centromere antibodies (ACA) contained in serum of patients with CREST syndrome. The cell nuclei were classified as G0, G1, S, G2, G1' and early S' phase by comparing microscopically identified groups of cell nuclei with flow cytometric determination of cell cycle stage of synchronized and unsynchronized lymphocyte cell cultures. Based on a discrimination analysis, a program was devised that calculated the probability for any cell nucleus belonging to the G0, G1, S, G2, G1' and early S' phase using only two microscopic parameters. Various characteristics were determined in the G0, S, and G2 stages. A transition stage to S phase within G1 was detected. This stage shows centromere arrangements not repeated in later cell cycles and which develop from the dissolution of centromere clusters in the periphery of the nucleus during G0 and G1. S phase exhibits various non-random centromere arrangements and associations of centromeres with the nucleolus. G1' and early S' phase of the second cell cycle display no characteristic centromere arrangement. The duplication of centromeres in G2 is asynchronous in two phases. For all cell phases a test for random distribution of the centromeres in the cell nucleus was performed. There is a distinct tendency for centromeres to be in a peripheral position during G0 and G1; this tendency becomes weaker in S phase. Although the visual impression is a seemingly random distribution of centromeres in G2 and G1', statistical analysis still demonstrates a significant deviation from random distribution in favor of a peripheral location. Only the early S phase of the second cell cycle shows no significant deviation from a random distribution.

Cell Cycle

Centromere-dependent binding of yeast minichromosomes to microtubules in vitro.

We present an in vitro assay for yeast centromere function; isolated yeast minichromosomes require a functional centromere to bind to bovine microtubules and sediment with them. Centromere-bovine microtubule complexes form at physiological microtubule concentrations. Two of the three centromere DNA elements, which are necessary for centromere function in vivo, are also necessary for centromeres to bind microtubules in vitro. However, purified centromere DNA alone does not bind to microtubules. These results suggest that microtubule binding must be mediated by the two centromere DNA elements and factors that associate with one or both of them. The percent of centromeres with microtubule-binding activity is 7- to 10-fold higher in lysates made from nocodazole-arrested G2-M cells than from alpha factor G1 cells, suggesting that this centromere activity is regulated during the cell cycle. The potential of this assay for dissecting centromere assembly, function, and regulation is discussed.

Adenosine Triphosphate

Revisiting the question: When is a centromere not a kinetochore?

Centromeres have been the focus of extensive research for almost a century, so it may come as a surprise that a consistent definition and nomenclature for these structures remains elusive. In recent times, centromeric chromatin is most frequently defined by the presence of nucleosomes containing the H3 variant CENP-A and is typically synonymous with the site of the inner-kinetochore. However, crucial mammalian centromere proteins including CENP-B and INCENP have well defined distributions that show very little overlap with CENP-A. Additional protein localisations spanning the primary constriction or forming a band below CENP-A chromatin have been reported. Together, these observations suggest a complex and multi-layered chromatin organisation that is not well served by the canonical dichotomy of 'centromeric' and 'pericentromeric' chromatin. Strikingly, this is not a new observation but was made soon after the discovery of CENP proteins, including in a 1991 publication titled 'When is the centromere not a kinetochore?'. Here we revisit this question, which has become more pertinent following technical innovations in long-read sequencing and super-resolution microscopy. We present a model of centromere organisation for monocentromeres that incorporates additional complexity. We then use this model to reconceptualise diverse centromere forms in other eukaryotes including regional centromeres, holocentromeres and centromeres that lack key proteins including CENP-A. In this way, we hope to move towards a unified understanding of centromeric chromatin.

Centromere

Centromere autoantigens are associated with the nucleolus.

Because of their importance as target antigens in scleroderma and since all other major autoantigens in scleroderma can be localized to the interphase nucleolus, we were interested in a further investigation of the potential relationship between interphase centromeres and the nucleolus. Using human anticentromere autoantibodies (ACA) from patients with the CREST form of scleroderma as probes in indirect immunofluorescence microscopy, we observed nonrandom interphase "clumping" of centromeres in a distribution suggestive of nucleoli. By double-label immunofluorescence comparing the localization of centromeres to nucleolar proteins Ki-67, fibrillarin, or protein B23 (nucleophosmin), interphase centromeres appeared to be localized around and within nucleoli. A number of different ACA sera were tested on HEp-2, HeLa, PtK2, Indian muntjac, 3T3, and NRK cells, all with identical results indicating colocalization between centromeres and nucleoli. Immunoelectron microscopy revealed that interphase centromeres were distributed free in the nucleoplasm, in contact with the nuclear envelope, in contact with and on the periphery of nucleoli, and totally embedded within the confines of the nucleolus itself. Interestingly, actinomycin D treatment dissociated centromeres from localization within the segregated nucleolus. To determine if interphase centromeres were integral components of nucleoli, nucleoli were isolated according to classical methods. By double-label immunofluorescence, immunoelectron microscopy, and Western blotting, it was demonstrated that centromere autoantigens copurified with isolated nucleoli. These studies offer proof that some interphase centromeres can be associated with, and may even be considered part of, the interphase nucleolus. Furthermore, all of the major autoantigens in scleroderma can now be localized to the nucleolus.

Autoantigens

The TUBG meshwork is associated with centromere dynamics and micronuclear organization.

This study investigates how γ-tubulin and the centrosome contribute to interphase centromere dynamics and nuclear organization. Although classically associated with mitotic microtubule nucleation, here we show that γ-tubulin associates with chromatin and is enriched within centromere-defined volumes. Using live-cell imaging, immunofluorescence, and chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing, we detect γ-tubulin-associated signal at satellite-rich, centromere-proximal chromatin. Reduced γ-tubulin levels are associated with increased centromere fluorescence intensity and reduced mobility, linking the γ-tubulin network to centromere organization. Under acute cisplatin-induced stress, centromere mobility increases, whereas centromere clustering is observed in separate fixed-cell analyses. Ser131 phosphorylation is associated with γ-tubulin self-assembly and centromere-related dynamics. Additionally, γ-tubulin accumulates in micronuclei, coinciding with increased replication-associated signal and DNA fluorescence. In primary clear cell renal cell carcinoma cells, stress is associated with higher γ-tubulin fluorescence intensity within centromere-defined volumes. Together, these findings support an association between the γ-tubulin meshwork and centromere organization, chromatin compartmentalization, and responses to genomic stress.

Centromere

Presence of a centromeric filament during meiosis.

Spermatocytes at meiotic metaphase I and anaphase I have a characteristic centromeric filament in a variety of vertebrate organisms. This centromeric filament was first demonstrated on mouse spermatocytes and its presence is now extended to spermatocytes from the human, rat, golden hamster, bull, and chicken. The visualization of this filament was possible through the use of a novel silver-staining technique, which allows a high contrast between the filament and the centromeric chromatin. In the species cited, the centromeric filament shares an intense staining, a short (0.2-0.6 micron) length, a curved and branched shape, and location inside the centromeric chromatin of seemingly every homologue of the complement. The similarity of staining reactivity and the observation of transitional structures during first meiotic prophase strongly suggest that the centromeric filament is a remnant of a lateral element of the synaptonemal complex, which stays specifically at both centromeric regions of each bivalent. This filament is not found at the second meiotic division or at the centromeres of mitotic chromosomes. It is assumed that this centromeric filament joins the two sister chromatids of each homologue at the centromere and thus ensures the proper coorientation of sister kinetochores at metaphase I. Further testable assumptions on the functions of this filament are presented.

Animals

Nuclear distribution of centromeres during the cell cycle of human diploid fibroblasts.

The distribution of centromeres in the interphase nuclei of human diploid fibroblasts was analyzed using anti-centromere immunofluorescence and laser scanning confocal microscopoy. The positions of the centromeres were placed within the nuclear chromatin distribution and presented some aspects of the dynamics of nuclear structure during the cell cycle. During the G1 phase of the cell cycle many of the centromeres were located in association with nucleoli or fused in chromocenters. A few centromeres were dispersed singly in the euchromatin. During S phase, the fused centromeres dispersed, often forming distinct patterns of rings or lines. At prophase, the centromere immunofluorescence condensed into distinct double dots upon the formation of the prophase chromosomes. Quantitative analysis by both image and flow cytometry showed that the intensity of immunofluorescence started to duplicate in mid S phase, well before the appearance of the double dots. The coalesence of the centromeres during G1 indicated that regions of the chromosome domains remain compacted and possibly sequestered from transcriptional activity. During S phase the chromatin and the coalesced centromeres dispersed for DNA replication. The dynamics of the centromeres and chromatin during the cell cycle seen here are evidence for a higher-order organization of nuclear structure that accompanies DNA transcription and replication.

Cell Nucleus

Identification of a subdomain of CENP-B that is necessary and sufficient for localization to the human centromere.

We have combined in vivo and in vitro approaches to investigate the function of CENP-B, a major protein of human centromeric heterochromatin. Expression of epitope-tagged deletion derivatives of CENP-B in HeLa cells revealed that a single domain less than 158 residues from the amino terminus of the protein is sufficient to localize CENP-B to centromeres. Centromere localization was abolished if as few as 28 amino acids were removed from the amino terminus of CENP-B. The centromere localization signal of CENP-B can function in an autonomous fashion, relocating a fused bacterial enzyme to centromeres. The centromere localization domain of CENP-B specifically binds in vitro to a subset of alpha-satellite DNA monomers. These results suggest that the primary mechanism for localization of CENP-B to centromeres involves the recognition of a DNA sequence found at centromeres. Analysis of the distribution of this sequence in alpha-satellite DNA suggests that CENP-B binding may have profound effects on chromatin structure at centromeres.

Autoantigens

Haplotype-resolved telomere-to-telomere genome assembly of Populus lasiocarpa unveils retrotransposon-driven centromere evolution.

Centromeres, essential for chromosome segregation, exhibit remarkable evolutionary dynamism in sequence composition and structural organization. Here, we report the first haplotype-resolved, telomere-to-telomere genome assembly of Populus lasiocarpa (PLAS) and precisely map all 38 functional centromeres through CENH3 ChIP-Seq. Unlike classical satellite-rich centromeres in model plants, PLAS centromeres lack abundant satellite arrays but are dominated by retrotransposons, particularly RLG and RIL elements, which form intricate nested TE arrays within the functional centromeric regions, disrupting their structural integrity and driving their evolution. Comparative analysis with P. trichocarpa reveals a conserved retrotransposon-dominated architecture, despite minimal sequence conservation. We propose a cyclic model of centromere evolution in which autonomous retrotransposons destabilize functional centromeres through epigenetic erosion, triggering neocentromere formation at pericentromeric sites enriched in transposable elements (TEs) and tandem repeats (TRs). These neocentromeres either succumb to recurrent retrotransposon invasions or stabilize through KARMA-mediated TR expansion, ultimately giving rise to satellite-rich centromeres. Our work redefines centromeres as dynamic, epigenetically plastic domains shaped by retrotransposon-TR antagonism, challenging the satellite-centric paradigm and offering novel insights into plant genome evolution.

Retroelements

Replication forks pause at yeast centromeres.

The 120 bp of yeast centromeric DNA is tightly complexed with protein to form a nuclease-resistant core structure 200 to 240 bp in size. We have used two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis to analyze the replication of the chromosomal copies of yeast CEN1, CEN3, and CEN4 and determine the fate of replication forks that encounter the protein-DNA complex at the centromere. We have shown that replication fork pause sites are coincident with each of these centromeres and therefore probably with all yeast centromeres. We have analyzed the replication of plasmids containing mutant derivatives of CEN3 to determine whether the replication fork pause site is a result of an unusual structure adopted by centromere DNA or a result of the protein-DNA complex formed at the centromere. The mutant centromere derivatives varied in function as well as the ability to form the nuclease-resistant core structure. The data obtained from analysis of these derivatives indicate that the ability to cause replication forks to pause correlates with the ability to form the nuclease-resistant core structure and not with the presence or absence of a particular DNA sequence. Our findings further suggest that the centromere protein-DNA complex is present during S phase when replication forks encounter the centromere and therefore may be present throughout the cell cycle.

Base Sequence

The dynamic centromere.

Centromeres are fundamental chromosomal structures that ensure accurate chromosome segregation during cell division. Despite their conserved and essential role in maintaining genomic stability, centromeres are subject to rapid evolutionary change. At the heart of centromere identity is the histone H3 variant CENP-A, an epigenetic mark that defines and propagates active centromeres and is essential for their function. Recent evidence supports a rapid evolution of centromere DNA sequences but also suggests a certain degree of flexibility in CENP-A deposition and propagation. The phenomenon of centromere drift, recently observed in humans, highlights how the dynamic repositioning of CENP-A and associated epigenetic environment over time maintains a regulated equilibrium, ensuring centromere function despite positional variation. Understanding these processes is crucial for unraveling centromere dynamics and their broader implications for genome stability and evolution.

Centromere

The centromere landscapes of four karyotypically diverse Papaver species provide insights into chromosome evolution and speciation.

Understanding the roles played by centromeres in chromosome evolution and speciation is complicated by the fact that centromeres comprise large arrays of tandemly repeated satellite DNA, which hinders high-quality assembly. Here, we used long-read sequencing to generate nearly complete genome assemblies for four karyotypically diverse Papaver species, P. setigerum (2n = 44), P. somniferum (2n = 22), P. rhoeas (2n = 14), and P. bracteatum (2n = 14), collectively representing 45 gapless centromeres. We identified four centromere satellite (cenSat) families and experimentally validated two representatives. For the two allopolyploid genomes (P. somniferum and P. setigerum), we characterized the subgenomic distribution of each satellite and identified a "homogenizing" phase of centromere evolution in the aftermath of hybridization. An interspecies comparison of the peri-centromeric regions further revealed extensive centromere-mediated chromosome rearrangements. Taking these results together, we propose a model for studying cenSat competition after hybridization and shed further light on the complex role of the centromere in speciation.

Centromere