SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “clopidogrel”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2025

Association of Cyp2c19 Genotype with Variability in Clopidogrel Response in Coronary Patients.

The variability of clopidogrel response is due to many factors including polymorphisms affecting CYP2C19. This study aims to assess the impact of the CYP2C19*2(681G > A), CYP2C19*3(636G > A) and CYP2C19*17(-806 C > T) polymorphisms on platelet response to clopidogrel in patients with coronary artery disease. This is a cross-sectional study led on patients treated with clopidogrel (75 mg/day for at least seven days). Platelet reactivity was assessed by the VerifyNow® P2Y12 test and high on treatment platelet reactivity was defined by a PRU ≥ 208. The genotyping of CYP2C19 polymorphisms was performed by PCR- RFLP. The study involved 115 coronary patients with a mean age of 58 ± 10 years. The VerifyNow®P2Y12 test showed that 27.8% were resistant to clopidogrel. The genetic study showed that CYP2C19*2(681G > A) is significantly associated with biological resistance to clopidogrel (G vs. A, OR = 4.713 [95% CI: 1.738-12.780]; p = 0.002), while CYP2C19*17(-806 C > T) is a protective factor against clopidogrel non-responsiveness (C vs. T, OR = 0.413 [95% CI: 0.174-0.981]; p = 0.02). By classifying patients into extensive (*1/*1: 52%), intermediate (*1/*2: 16%) and ultra-rapid metabolizers (*1/*17;*17/*17: 32%), we found that the type of metabolizer had a significant impact on clopidogrel response (p = 0.001). CYP2C19*2 (681G > A) is significantly associated with biological resistance to clopidogrel while CYP2C19*17(-806 C > T) is a protective factor against clopidogrel non-responsiveness.

Cardiovascular↗

PubMed2024

Molecular genomic and epigenomic characteristics related to aspirin and clopidogrel resistance.

BACKGROUND: Mediators, genomic and epigenomic characteristics involving in metabolism of arachidonic acid by cyclooxygenase (COX) and lipoxygenase (ALOX) and hepatic activation of clopidogrel have been individually suggested as factors associated with resistance against aspirin and clopidogrel. The present multi-center prospective cohort study evaluated whether the mediators, genomic and epigenomic characteristics participating in arachidonic acid metabolism and clopidogrel activation could be factors that improve the prediction of the aspirin and clopidogrel resistance in addition to cardiovascular risks. METHODS: We enrolled 988 patients with transient ischemic attack and ischemic stroke who were evaluated for a recurrence of ischemic stroke to confirm clinical resistance, and measured aspirin (ARU) and P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) using VerifyNow to assess laboratory resistance 12 weeks after aspirin and clopidogrel administration. We investigated whether mediators, genotypes, and promoter methylation of genes involved in COX and ALOX metabolisms and clopidogrel activation could synergistically improve the prediction of ischemic stroke recurrence and the ARU and PRU levels by integrating to the established cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: The logistic model to predict the recurrence used thromboxane A synthase 1 (TXAS1, rs41708) A/A genotype and ALOX12 promoter methylation as independent variables, and, improved sensitivity of recurrence prediction from 3.4% before to 13.8% after adding the mediators, genomic and epigenomic variables to the cardiovascular risks. The linear model we used to predict the ARU level included leukotriene B4, COX2 (rs20417) C/G and thromboxane A2 receptor (rs1131882) A/A genotypes with the addition of COX1 and ALOX15 promoter methylations as variables. The linear PRU prediction model included G/A and prostaglandin I receptor (rs4987262) G/A genotypes, COX2 and TXAS1 promoter methylation, as well as cytochrome P450 2C19*2 (rs4244285) A/A, G/A, and *3 (rs4986893) A/A genotypes as variables. The linear models for predicting ARU (r = 0.291, R2 = 0.033, p < 0.01) and PRU (r = 0.503, R2 = 0.210, p < 0.001) levels had improved prediction performance after adding the genomic and epigenomic variables to the cardiovascular risks. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that different mediators, genomic and epigenomic characteristics of arachidonic acid metabolism and clopidogrel activation synergistically improved the prediction of the aspirin and clopidogrel resistance together with the cardiovascular risk factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03823274.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Clopidogrel vs Aspirin According to Diabetes Mellitus: A Prespecified Analysis of the SMART-CHOICE 3 Trial.

BACKGROUND: Recent trials support the superior efficacy of clopidogrel compared to aspirin monotherapy after completion of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, limited evidence is available in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of clopidogrel vs aspirin monotherapy according to the presence of DM. METHODS: This was a prespecified analysis of the SMART-CHOICE 3 trial, which was a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing clopidogrel vs aspirin monotherapy in patients with complex coronary lesions or high-risk clinical characteristics. From August 2020 to July 2023, a total of 5,506 patients who underwent PCI and standard DAPT duration and had complex coronary lesions, DM, or previous myocardial infarction, were randomized to clopidogrel or aspirin monotherapy groups. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), which was defined as a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or stroke. RESULTS: Of 5,506 patients, 2,089 had DM (1,039 in the clopidogrel group and 1,050 in the aspirin group). At a median follow-up of 2.3 years (IQR: 1.6-3.0 years), DM patients had a higher risk of MACCE compared to non-DM patients (6.8% vs 4.7%; HR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.10-1.87; P = 0.008). Clopidogrel showed a significantly lower risk of MACCE than aspirin in DM patients (4.5% vs 9.1%; HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.38-0.86; P = 0.008). There was no significant interaction between DM and antiplatelet monotherapy regarding MACCE (P for interaction = 0.124). The risk of bleeding was comparable between the 2 groups in DM patients (2.9% vs 2.9%; HR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.57-1.95; P = 0.855). CONCLUSIONS: Among DM patients who completed the standard duration of DAPT after PCI, clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, and stroke compared with aspirin monotherapy, without increased rates of bleeding. There was no significant interaction between DM and antiplatelet monotherapy with respect to MACCE. (SMART-CHOICE 3 [SMart Angioplasty Research Team: CHoice of Optimal Anti-Thrombotic Strategy in Patients Undergoing Implantation of Coronary Drug-Eluting Stents 3]; NCT04418479).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Clopidogrel Versus Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy for Long-Term Maintenance After Coronary Stenting in Ischemic and Bleeding Birisk Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes and Diabetes: A Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of the OPT-BIRISK Trial.

BACKGROUND: Among patients with acute coronary syndromes at both high bleeding and ischemic risk (birisk), extended clopidogrel monotherapy after 9 to 12 months of dual-antiplatelet therapy reduces bleeding without increasing ischemia. Whether this benefit extends to birisk patients with diabetes is unknown. METHODS: This prespecified subgroup analysis of the OPT-BIRISK (Optimal Antiplatelet Therapy for High Bleeding and Ischemic Risk Patients) trial included birisk patients with acute coronary syndrome who had completed 9 to 12 months of dual-antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients were then randomized 1:1 to 9 months of clopidogrel plus placebo versus clopidogrel plus aspirin. Outcomes were compared by diabetes status. The primary end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding at 9 months after randomization. The key secondary end point was major adverse cardiac and cerebral events, defined as a composite outcome of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or clinically driven revascularization. RESULTS: Of 7758 patients, 4072 (52.5%) had diabetes. Clopidogrel monotherapy decreased Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding (2.1% versus 3.2%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [95% CI, 0.45-0.97]) with no increase in major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (2.9% versus 3.6%; HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.56-1.12]) compared with clopidogrel plus aspirin in patients with diabetes. Outcomes were consistent in patients without diabetes, with no significant interactions by diabetes status. CONCLUSIONS: In birisk patients with acute coronary syndrome who were stable on dual-antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin for 9 to 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention, clopidogrel monotherapy for an additional 9 months reduced clinically relevant bleeding without increasing ischemic events compared with continued dual-antiplatelet therapy, irrespective of diabetes status. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03431142.

Aged↗

PubMed2025

Impact of Race on Profiles of Platelet Reactivity and Clinical Outcomes in Clopidogrel-Treated Participants.

Black individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) experience higher rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) than non-Black individuals. This study assessed the racial differences in platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes among clopidogrel-treated participants. Two cohorts were analyzed. The pharmacodynamic (PD) cohort involved patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease on maintenance clopidogrel therapy undergoing platelet function testing. The primary outcome was high platelet reactivity (HPR, i.e., P2Y12 reaction unit [PRU] > 208). The PCI cohort included participants undergoing PCI on clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcome was 1-year MACE, defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, or stent thrombosis. Data on clinically significant bleeding and CYP2C19 genotyping alleles were collected. The PD and PCI cohorts included 728 (32.1% Black) and 2,770 (20.5% Black) participants, respectively. Black participants had higher PRU levels (184 [IQR 128-234] vs. 144 [IQR 88-195]; P < 0.001) and higher prevalence of HPR (39.3% vs. 20.6%; P < 0.001). Independent predictors of HPR included Black race, hemoglobin levels, and presence of CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele. In the PCI cohort, Black participants had a higher risk of MACE (HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.02-2.11; P = 0.037), primarily driven by MI (HR 1.71; 95% CI 1.09-2.67; P = 0.019), with no significant difference in clinically significant bleeding (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.65-1.80; P = 0.768). Black participants on clopidogrel exhibit higher platelet reactivity, increased rates of HPR, and an elevated risk of MACE within 1 year after PCI, without significant differences in bleeding compared to non-Black participants.

Aged↗

PubMed2025

Discovery of ancestry-specific variants associated with clopidogrel response among Caribbean Hispanics.

High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) with clopidogrel predicts ischemic events in adults with coronary artery disease, and while HTPR varies by ethnicity, no genome-wide association study (GWAS) of clopidogrel response has been conducted in Caribbean Hispanics. This study aimed to identify genetic predictors of HTPR in a cohort of 511 Puerto Rican cardiovascular patients treated with clopidogrel, stratified by P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) into responders and non-responders (HTPR). Local ancestry inference (LAI) and traditional GWAS identified variants in the CYP2C19 region associated with HTPR, primarily in individuals with European ancestry. Three variants (OSBPL10 rs1376606, DERL3 rs5030613, RGS6 rs9323567) showed suggestive significance, and a variant in UNC5C was linked to increased HTPR risk. These findings highlight the unique genetic landscape of Caribbean Hispanics and challenge the significance of CYP2C19*2 in predicting clopidogrel response in patients with high non-European ancestry. Further studies are needed to replicate these results in other diverse cohorts.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

2025 Acute Coronary Syndrome Guideline: Missing the Boat on CYP2C19 Genotyping.

The 2025 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/American College of Emergency Physicians/National Association of Emergency Medical Services Physicians/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions acute coronary syndrome guideline focuses on strategies to reduce bleeding risk with antiplatelet therapy yet lacks any recommendation related to CYP2C19 genotyping. The impact of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles on the effectiveness of clopidogrel is well documented, and although prasugrel and ticagrelor more effectively reduce the risk for atherothrombotic events compared with clopidogrel in patients with a CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele, clopidogrel reduces bleeding risk without an increase in atherothrombotic events compared with prasugrel or ticagrelor in those without a loss-of-function allele. Accordingly, an American Heart Association Scientific Statement supports CYP2C19 genetic testing before oral P2Y12 inhibitors are prescribed. This commentary summarizes the evidence in support of CYP2C19-guided P2Y12 inhibitor selection in the context of other 2025 acute coronary syndrome guideline recommendations and urges future guidelines to incorporate recommendations for CYP2C19 genotyping, especially for those at high bleeding risk.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Clinical outcomes stratified by CYP2C19 phenotypes in intracranial artery stenting patients with genotype-guided antiplatelet regimens: a real-world single-center retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical trial evidence is scarce for optimal antiplatelet strategies in patients undergoing intracranial artery stenting with CYP2C19 loss‑of‑function alleles, especially regarding the efficacy‑safety balance. METHODS: This single‑center retrospective study enrolled patients receiving genotype‑guided antiplatelet regimens for intracranial stenting between January and December 2023, with 6‑month follow‑up. Clinical outcomes were compared across CYP2C19 phenotypes. RESULTS: Among 205 patients, 46.8% were normal metabolizers, 40.5% intermediate metabolizers, and 12.7% poor metabolizers. Aspirin-clopidogrel was prescribed for all normal metabolizers, 80.7% intermediate metabolizers, and 19.2% poor metabolizers. No intergroup differences were observed in risks of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), cardiovascular events, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), or any bleeding (all P > 0.05). In intermediate metabolizers and poor metabolizer subgroups, ischemic stroke/TIA rates were 11.1% in the aspirin-clopidogrel group and 9.68% in the aspirin-ticagrelor group, with no significant difference compared to normal metabolizers (4.17%). ICH rates were 1.39% in the aspirin-clopidogrel group and 6.45% in the aspirin-ticagrelor group, showing no significant difference versus normal metabolizers (1.04%). Multivariate logistic analysis found the number of stents (odds ratio [OR] = 2.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.89-6.95; P = 0.043) was a risk factor for ischemic stroke/TIA. Ticagrelor-based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT; OR = 10.57; 95% CI = 1.00-111.7; P = 0.05) and baseline l ow-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; OR = 7.22; 95% CI = 1.80-29.01; P = 0.005) were associated with ICH risk. CONCLUSION: Antiplatelet regimens were adjusted for a subset of intermediate metabolizers and poor metabolizers prior to stenting, and the 6-month clinical outcomes were comparable across normal metabolizers, intermediate metabolizers, and poor metabolizers. The stent number was associated with ischemic stroke/TIA risk; baseline LDL-C and ticagrelor-based DAPT with ICH risk. These exploratory findings need validation in adequately powered studies.

CYP2C19↗

PubMed2026

Pharmacogenomic and drug interactions risk in cardio-oncology: A precision medicine perspective for India.

Cardio-oncology patients may face complex treatment regimens due to the concurrent existence of cancer and cardiovascular disease, leading to a considerable polypharmacy burden. This significantly increases the prospect of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and gene-drug interactions. The majority of these interactions arise from comparable pharmacokinetic and pharmacological pathways associated with drug transporters and cytochrome P450 enzymes. The significance of pharmacogenomics in tailored treatment strategies are emphasised by the fact that genetic variability enhances individual differences in drug response, safety, and efficacy. This narrative review focus on the effects of key genetic polymorphisms (e.g., DPYD, CYP2C19, and CYP2C9) on the metabolism and efficacy of commonly prescribed anticancer and cardiovascular medications such as fluoropyrimidines, clopidogrel, and warfarin. In addition it explore the role of pharmacogenomic variants on drug-drug interactions within the field of cardio-oncology. The study ultimately emphasizes the necessity of precision medicine in India to address the genetic diversity and underrepresentation in global genomic databases. The absence of pharmacogenomic testing, infrastructural deficiencies, financial constraints, and insufficient clinical integration hinder the widespread use of this technology in India. The Genome India Project and other national initiatives establish the foundation for pharmacogenomic-guided therapy. Utilizing genetic data, together with artificial intelligence-based predictive tools, for clinical decision-making may enhance medication safety and yield optimal outcomes in Indian cardio-oncology patients.

Humans↗

PubMed2018

Long non-coding RNA metallothionein 1 pseudogene 3 promotes p2y12 expression by sponging miR-126 to activate platelet in diabetic animal model.

Platelet hyperaggregation and hypercoagulation are associated with increase of thrombogenic risk, especially in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). High activity of P2Y12 receptor is found in T2D patients, exposing such patients to a prothrombotic condition. P2Y12 is a promising target for antiplatelet, but due to P2Y12 receptor constitutive activation, the clinical practical phenomena such as "clopidogrel resistance" are commonly occurring. In this study, we investigate the role of lncRNA on platelet activation. By lncRNA array, we screened thousands of differentially expressed lncRNA in megakaryocytes from T2D patients and confirmed that lncRNA metallothionein 1 pseudogene 3 (MT1P3) was significantly upregulated in megakaryocytes from T2D patients than in healthy controls. And we further investigate the biofunction of MT1P3 on platelet activation and the regulatory mechanism on p2y12. MT1P3 was positively correlated with p2y12 mRNA levels and promoted p2y12 expression by sponging miR-126. Knockdown of MT1P3 by siRNA reduced p2y12 expression, inhibiting platelet activation and aggregation in diabetes animal model. In conclusion, our findings identify MT1P3 as a key regulator in platelet activation by increasing p2y12 expression through sponging miR-126 under T2D condition. These findings may provide a new insight for managing platelet hyperactivity-related diseases.

Animals↗

PubMed2026

Ultrashort vs Standard-Duration Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Undergoing PCI: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of ultrashort (≤1-month) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by antiplatelet monotherapy remain uncertain in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare ultrashort vs standard-duration DAPT in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials until February 15, 2026. Primary outcomes were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), major bleeding, and net adverse clinical event (NACE). Prespecified subgroup analyses examined by ethnicity (East Asian vs non-East Asian) and abbreviation strategy (intensive: ≤1-week DAPT or clopidogrel/aspirin monotherapy vs moderate: ≥2-week DAPT, followed by ticagrelor/prasugrel monotherapy). RESULTS: Across 10 trials (n = 29,232), ultrashort DAPT did not increase MACCE risk (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.93-1.20; P = 0.38; I2 = 24%), with higher MACCE risk observed in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) but not non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS), and significantly reduced major bleeding (HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.35-0.64; P < 0.00001; I2 = 44%), resulting in a net clinical benefit (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.72-0.97; P = 0.02; I2 = 61%). Bleeding reduction was more pronounced in East Asians (HR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.25-0.49; P < 0.00001; I2 = 0%) than non-East Asians (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.43-0.93; P = 0.02; I2 = 44%), with a significant interaction (P = 0.02). The abbreviation strategy significantly modified outcomes (P for interaction = 0.003): intensive abbreviation raised MACCE risk (HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.11-1.69; P = 0.003; I2 = 0%), while moderate abbreviation had no statistically significant difference (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.85-1.08; P = 0.47; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ACS undergoing PCI, ultrashort DAPT reduced bleeding without increasing ischemic events overall, although a signal of increased MACCE was observed in STEMI but not in NSTE-ACS. Bleeding reduction was greater in East Asians, while ≤1-week DAPT or clopidogrel/aspirin monotherapy may increase ischemic risk.

Humans↗