SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “comparative oncology”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Outcomes of Response-Based Watch-and-Wait and Surgical Management After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BackgroundTotal neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) increases clinical complete response rates in locally advanced rectal cancer (RC), allowing response-based management strategies such as watch-and-wait (WW) as an alternative to total mesorectal excision (TME). Outcomes associated with WW after TNT remain incompletely defined. This study aimed to compare oncologic and organ-preservation outcomes between WW and surgical management following TNT.MethodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central up to April 2025. Observational studies comparing WW and TME following TNT were included. Pooled odds ratios (ORs), hazard ratios (HRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. Secondary outcomes included tumor regrowth, salvage surgery, and permanent stoma. Risk of bias was evaluated using ROBINS-I.ResultsSix studies comprising 793 patients were analyzed. WW showed no significant difference compared with TME regarding local recurrence (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.07-26.17; I2 = 80%), distant metastases (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.29-1.33; I2 = 49%), 5-year disease-free survival (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.71-1.31; I2 = 51.7%), or overall survival (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.81-1.30; I2 = 27.9%). Permanent stoma rates were lower with WW (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.01-1.23; I2 = 71%), becoming significant after sensitivity analysis (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01-0.19).ConclusionWW after TNT offers oncologic outcomes comparable to TME, with high organ preservation and reduced surgical morbidity in highly selected patients.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Partial Breast Irradiation for High Molecular Risk Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: Partial breast irradiation (PBI) is a suitable and well-tolerated alternative to whole breast irradiation (WBI) following lumpectomy for many forms of low-risk, early-stage breast cancer. Molecular risk scores, such as the Oncotype DX recurrence score (ODX RS), are increasingly guiding systemic treatment decisions. However, molecular/genomic profiling for radiation therapy (RT) decision-making remains investigational, and it is unclear whether a high ODX RS should preclude the use of PBI. We compared oncologic outcomes among patients with high ODX RS (>25) treated with PBI versus WBI. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients who underwent breast conservation followed by PBI or WBI with ODX RS > 25 were ascertained from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Comparable PBI and WBI cohorts were generated in 1:5 fashion using propensity score matching based on salient clinicopathologic features. We evaluated the incidence of local recurrence (LR) as a function of RT approach. RESULTS: We identified 968 patients with an ODX RS > 25 who were treated with adjuvant RT, with a median age of 59 years (range, 25-86) and a median 5.3 years of follow-up. In a propensity matched cohort analysis that included 28 patients who received PBI matched to 140 who received WBI, we observed 3 LR events among those receiving PBI (2 of which were in different quadrants from the primary lesion) and 5 events among those receiving WBI. Among this cohort with ODX RS > 25, the 72-month cumulative incidence of LR following PBI was 7.9% (95% CI, 1.3%-23%) compared to 4.8% (95% CI, 1.6%-11%) following WBI (P = .6). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with high ODX RS, few LRs were observed, and no statistically significant difference in LR was identified between PBI and WBI. Although these findings suggest that PBI may be considered in carefully-selected high-genomic-risk patients, larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to definitively establish the safety of this approach.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Older adults with resectable gastric cancer undergoing perioperative chemotherapy or preoperative chemoradiotherapy plus perioperative chemotherapy: A secondary analysis of the AGITG TOPGEAR phase III trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate treatment adherence, adverse events, and survival in older (≥70 years) adults undergoing perioperative treatment for gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients with resectable gastric/gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma (ECOG 0-1) enrolled in the phase III TOPGEAR trial were randomized to perioperative chemotherapy (ECF/ECX or FLOT) alone or perioperative chemotherapy plus preoperative chemoradiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions with concurrent fluoropyrimidine). In this exploratory analysis, treatment completion, grade ≥ 3 adverse events (CTCAE v3.0), surgical outcomes, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between older and younger adults. RESULTS: Of the 574 patients enrolled, 135 (24%) were ≥ 70 years. Older adults more frequently required preoperative chemotherapy dose reductions, omissions, or delays (chemoradiotherapy: 55% vs 35%, p = 0.004; chemotherapy: 60% vs 48%, p = 0.087). Rates of grade ≥ 3 adverse events were comparable between older and younger patients (chemoradiotherapy: 66% vs 67%, p = 0.874; chemotherapy: 68% vs 59%, p = 0.220), but older adults more often had hematologic toxicity and grade ≥ 3 diarrhea in the chemotherapy group (56% vs 37%, p = 0.006; 21% vs 6%, p < 0.001). Resection rates, grade 3/4 surgical complications, number of removed lymph nodes, and 30-/90-day mortality were similar by age. OS and PFS were comparable across age groups, with numerically favorable outcomes for older adults (OS: HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.58-1.26 [chemoradiotherapy]; HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.51-1.11 [chemotherapy]; PFS: HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.53-1.15 [chemoradiotherapy]; HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.47-1.03 [chemotherapy]). CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with gastric cancer achieved comparable oncologic outcomes to younger patients, despite more frequent treatment modifications and higher hematologic toxicity.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Intersphincteric resection versus abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical approach for lower rectal cancer (LRC) remains debated, particularly between intersphincteric resection (ISR) and abdominoperineal resection (APR). While ISR offers potential sphincter preservation, its oncological efficacy compared to APR is unclear. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to compare clinical and oncological outcomes of ISR versus APR in LRC patients. On December 8, 2024, a comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science identified 24 retrospective studies involving 4502 patients. Key outcomes analyzed included positive circumferential resection margin (CRM), number of harvested lymph nodes (LNs), local recurrence (LR), length of hospital stay (LOS), early postoperative complications, and survival. RESULTS: Twenty-four retrospective studies involving 4502 patients (ISR: 2266 (50.3%) and APR: 1558 (34.6%)) met the eligibility criteria. ISR was associated with significantly lower rates of positive CRM (risk ratio (RR): 0.41, p < 0.001), decreased early postoperative complications (RR: 0.76, p < 0.001), lower LR (RR: 0.63, p = 0.0038), and improvement in five-year overall survival (5YOS) (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.42, p < 0.001) and five-year disease-free survival (5YDFS) (HR = 0.59, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ISR demonstrates several advantages over APR in selected LRC patients, including lower rates of positive CRM, fewer early postoperative complications, reduced LR, greater LN harvest, shorter LOS, and improved long-term survival outcomes (5YOS and 5YDFS). Therefore, ISR can be considered a safe and effective alternative to APR in appropriately chosen patients, with careful patient selection and surgical expertise remaining essential.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Intravesical mitomycin-C administered immediately before transurethral resection of bladder tumor in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Clinical outcomes and molecular predictors from over 3 years of extended follow-up in a phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term outcomes and molecular correlates of response after immediate preoperative intravesical chemotherapy (IPeIC) with mitomycin-C (MMC) in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center, open-label, randomized phase II trial, 33 patients received two split doses of IPeIC/MMC (40 mg/20 mL), whereas 38 patients underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) alone. The primary endpoint was 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS). Exploratory RNA sequencing was performed on IPeIC-treated patients (three with recurrence, 25 without) using a Monte Carlo-based resampling strategy. RESULTS: The median follow-up durations were comparable between the intervention (60.0 months) and control arms (60.4 months). IPeIC/MMC reduced recurrence risk by 76.8% versus TURBT alone (p=0.024), yielding a 3-year RFS rate of 90.7% versus 78.6%. On multivariable analysis, IPeIC/MMC independently improved RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.266, p=0.044). IPeIC was associated with superior PFS, with 3-year and 5-year rates of 100% versus 92.1% and 85.8%, respectively, in the controls (HR 0.078, p=0.014). Exploratory transcriptomics identified low Glutathione S-transferase Mu 1 (GSTM1) expression as the factor most strongly associated with recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: IPeIC/MMC is associated with improved long-term oncological outcomes compared with TURBT alone and represents a safe prophylactic option for patients with NMIBC who are unable to receive standard immediate postoperative intravesical chemotherapy because of safety concerns or practical constraints. The GSTM1 findings are hypothesis-generating and support future biomarker-driven validation studies.

Aged↗

PubMed1979

Superiority of adriamycin-containing combination chemotherapy in the treatment of diffuse lymphoma: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

As a part of an ongoing prospective controlled trial, the Southwest Oncology Group compared the results of treatment of advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with two CHOP regimens (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine and prednisone with either low-dose bleomycin or BCG by scarification) to a COP regimen (cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone) with low-dose bleomycin (COP-Bleo). The study design emphasized histopathology review and systematic restaging to define complete remission (CR). Confirmed rates of CR for 443 evaluable patients were 59% for 286 patients receiving the CHOP regimens and 59% for 157 patients receiving COP-Bleo. Rates of CR were higher for patients with nodular lymphoma (69%) compared to those with diffuse lymphoma (54%) (p = 0.005). For patients with nodular lymphoma there was no difference in CR rates according to treatment. For patients with diffuse lymphomas the CR rate was higher with the CHOP programs (58%) than with COP-Bleo (44%) (p = 0.10). Overall duration of CR and survival was significantly longer for patients with nodular lymphoma compared to diffuse lymphoma (p less than 0.01). At this time, remission duration and survival were similar regardless of induction regimen used in patients with nodular lymphoma. However, in patients with diffuse lymphoma, the duration of CR and overall survival were improved by treatment with the CHOP regimens compared to COP-Bleo (p = 0.02). Thus, in this controlled study we have demonstrated that initial combination chemotherapy employing the CHOP regimen was a superior remission induction therapy for patients with diffuse lymphoma.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2026

Molecular subgroups of human malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors are conserved in canines.

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) are aggressive sarcomas of Schwann cell lineage with poor prognosis in both humans and dogs. While rare in humans, MPNSTs occur more frequently in dogs and share histomorphological and clinical features. Recent methylome and transcriptome analyses have identified two molecular subgroups of human MPNST with distinct oncogenic signaling pathways and prognostic implications; however, it remains unclear if these subgroups also exist in canines. Given their higher incidence and biological similarities to human disease, canine MPNSTs represent a promising comparative model to investigate molecular subtypes and evaluate novel therapeutic strategies. To characterize canine MPNST and assess molecular parallels with the human subgroups, we applied laser-capture microdissection (LCM) followed by RNAsequencing to analyze tumor tissue from 20 canine MPNST. Principle component and differential gene expression analyses identified two clearly distinct transcriptional clusters corresponding to spindle cell and epithelioid MPNST variants, respectively. Unsupervised cross-species comparison aligned the two canine clusters with the human G1 and G2 subgroups. Accordingly, one cluster was characterized by SHH pathway activation and increased cell cycle activity, while the other showed non-canonical WNT pathway, Schwann cell-like features and marked macrophage infiltration. Immunohistochemistry further demonstrated loss of H3K27me3, p-ERK activation and β-catenin signaling by IHC in a subset of tumors. These findings support the value of canine MPNST as clinically amenable model for structured assessment of novel therapeutic approaches to benefit patients of both species.

Canine cancer model↗

PubMed2025

Analysis of genomic traits of oral and laryngeal cancer: A comparative study.

Oral and laryngeal cancers exhibit overlapping clinical features but distinct genomic profiles. In a study of 60 Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas(HNSCC) cases (30 OSCC, 30 LSCC), NGS revealed TP53 mutations in 70% of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and 83% of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). CDKN2A alterations were more common in OSCC (40%) than LSCC (20%), while PIK3CA mutations were higher in LSCC (30%). NOTCH1 mutations were more frequent in OSCC (27%) than LSCC (10%). Pathway analysis showed disruptions in p53 and PI3K-Akt, with stronger enrichment in LSCC (ES: 3.42). The results suggest site-specific tumor biology influencing therapeutic targets. Molecular profiling is crucial for precision treatment in head and neck cancers.

Oral cancer↗

PubMed1975

[Tumor formations and cell proliferation in invertebrates].

Critical analysis of the present status of invertebrate oncology through an appreciation of data relative to the various origins of tumors : spontaneous formations, cell proliferations induced by viruses, so-called hereditary tumors, effects of injuries induced by carcinogenic agents, irradiations or hormones on the formation of neoplasms in invertebrates. Attempts are made to interpret these data as compared with those obtained in medical and veterinary oncology. The possible direction of studies on invertebrates towards comparative oncology is considered, emphasizing the great usefulness for the medical research to study the phylogenetic development of oncogenesis.

Animals↗

PubMed1977

Comparative trial of combination chemotherapy in extensive squamous carcinoma of the lung: a Southwest Oncology Group Study.

The Southwest Oncology Group carried out a comparative study of two combination chemotherapy regimens in 231 patients with extensive squamous carcinoma of the lung. One regimen consisted of bleomycin, adriamycin, CCNU, vincristine, and mechlorethamine (BACON). The other involved mechlorethamine, adriamycin, and CCNU (NAC) in the same dose and schedule but with the deletion of vincristine and bleomycin. The response rate was 21% for BACON and 16% for NAC. The median survival time (MST) was 16 weeks for all patients receiving each regimen. Pretreatment performance statues (PS) was significantly related to the response rates: these were 28% for BACON and 23% for NAC among fully ambulatory patients (PS, 8-10) versus 15% for BACON and 10% for NAC among those with a lesser PS (P less than 0.05). Survival was also influenced by PS; the MST was 28 weeks for PSs 8-10 with either regimen compared to an overall MST of 11.5 weeks for patients with PSs 5-7 and 2.8 weeks for PSs 1-4. The toxicity of the two regimens was comparable with a 4% incidence of treatment-related deaths. An additional 10% of the patients were hospitalized because of life-threatening but reversible toxic effects. The only patients for whom there may be an improvement in MST over that expected from supportive care alone are those with PSs 8-10. Patients who demonstrated response or improvement, regardless of PS, had a significantly longer MST: 39.5 versus 11.2 weeks for those who did not respond (P = 0.001).

Aged↗

PubMed1976

Hypnotic efficacy of triazolam and methyprylon ininsomniac in-patients.

The hypnotic effects of a new triazolobenzodiazepine, triazolam (Halcion) 0-5 mg and methyprylon 300 mg was compared in twenty oncologic in-patient volunteers with insomnia using the preference technique. On the first night of the two-night trial, or methyprylon was given on a double-blind basis and on the second night the patients received the alternate medication. Following each trial night the patients were interviewed in regard to their sleep. Of the seventeen patients who completed the study, eleven patients preferred triazolam, three preferred methyprylon and three had no preference (p=0-057). Analysis of the various sleep parameters showed that triazolam helped the patients sleep more than methyprylon (p=0-13), induced more rapid sleep onset (p=0-003), gave a longer duration of sleep (p=0-013). The treatment was considered a success if the patient went to sleep in thirty minutes or less and slept for at least six hours. Triazolam was more successful than methyprylon in this respect (p=0-012). There were no side-effects reported on either of the drugs.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Minimally invasive versus open surgery for gallbladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is increasingly being used in gallbladder cancer (GBC) for radical tumour extirpation. However, there are conflicting results on the morbidity outcomes following MIS. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the post-operative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing radical surgery for GBC between MIS and open surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Studies comparing MIS (laparoscopic, robotic or both techniques) to open surgery were included. The databases of MEDLINE, Cochrane and EMBASE were searched from 2001 till March 2025. The primary end point was post-operative morbidity and mortality. The secondary end points were hospital stay, blood loss, operative time and R1 resection rates. Random effect models were used for analysis. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies (laparoscopic [n = 19], robotic [n = 6] or both [n = 7]) involving 8568 (MIS = 3287 and open = 5281) patients were included. For overall and major morbidity (Clavian-Dindo >/ = III), the odds ratio (OR) of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.46-0.78) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.52-1.0) respectively was obtained, favouring the MIS approach. Similarly, MIS showed lower odds for mortality [OR:0.62 (95% CI: 0.40-0.95)] compared to open surgery. MIS was associated with shorter hospital stay (less by mean of 3 days) and lesser blood loss (less by mean of 115 ml) but longer operative time (higher by mean of 5.8 min) and higher R1 resection rates (OR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.05-1.71). Oncological outcomes, however, were comparable. The certainty of evidence was very low to low across the studies. CONCLUSION: MIS for GBC was associated with relatively lower post operative morbidity and mortality with similar oncological outcomes but with a small but heightened risk of margin positive (R1) resection, especially in primary GBC. The certainty of evidence was very low to low across the included studies. Future prospective studies are needed to overcome the clinical heterogeneity and possible selection bias.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Robotic surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review.

Robotic surgery is used for selected gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs), particularly when location makes conventional wedge resection difficult. We synthesised technical, perioperative, pathological, functional and oncological outcomes. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 14 August 2026. Primary reports with at least three eligible robotic gastric-GIST patients were included. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and completed design-specific JBI appraisal. Because outcome definitions, denominators and reporting were heterogeneous, findings were synthesised narratively in accordance with SWiM guidance rather than pooled. Twenty-three studies, including six comparative cohorts, were included. Institutional robotic cohorts contained 3-45 eligible patients; one national registry included 1,567 robotic cases. Tumour size ranged from 2.68 ± 1.55 to 7.9 ± 1.8 cm among studies reporting means. Most institutional reports described R0 resection in all eligible patients; exceptions were 23/24 and 24/25, while the registry reported 1,425/1,567 R0 resections. Grade III morbidity occurred in 2/25 patients in one function-preserving series. Registry 30- and 90-day mortality after robotic resection were 0.5% and 0.8%, respectively. Comparative studies did not demonstrate superior postoperative or oncological outcomes with robotic surgery. Robotic gastric-GIST resection appears feasible in selected patients and may facilitate organ-preserving surgery at anatomically challenging sites. Current observational evidence does not establish comparative functional, oncological or economic superiority.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Sutureless versus renorrhaphy in robot-assisted off-clamp partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The necessity of routine parenchymal renorrhaphy during off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare perioperative, functional, safety, and oncological outcomes between sutureless and conventional renorrhaphy. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Comparative studies evaluating sutureless versus conventional renorrhaphy during purely off-clamp RAPN were included. Trifecta achievement was the primary outcome. Random-effects models were used for pooled analyses, with subgroup analysis according to study design. RESULTS: Four studies involving 787 patients, including one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and three propensity score-matched (PSM) studies, were included. The overall pooled estimate showed no statistically significant difference in Trifecta achievement (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.97-1.41), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 86.5%). The PSM studies favored the sutureless approach (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.05-1.52), whereas the RCT yielded an RR of 0.97 (95% CI 0.92-1.04) and met the prespecified noninferiority criterion without demonstrating superiority. The sutureless approach was associated with a smaller perioperative eGFR decline (MD - 3.89, 95% CI - 6.16 to - 1.62), while no significant difference was observed in eGFR at 3 months. No statistically significant differences were identified in major complications, blood transfusion, or positive surgical margins; urinary and vascular complications were sparsely reported. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients undergoing purely off-clamp RAPN, randomized evidence supports the noninferiority of a strategy that omits routine parenchymal renorrhaphy while permitting clinically necessary selective repair, but does not demonstrate superiority. Favorable estimates from PSM studies remain vulnerable to intraoperative treatment-selection bias. Current evidence is insufficient to determine whether omission of renorrhaphy affects urinary complications, long-term renal function, or oncological outcomes. REGISTRATION: This systematic review was registered prospectively in PROSPERO (CRD420261435995).

Humans↗

PubMed1979

5-FU versus combination therapy with tubercidin, streptozotocin, and 5-FU in the treatment of pancreatic carcinomas: COG protocol 7230.

From May 1972 until May 1976, 105 patients were entered on Central Oncology Group protocol 7230 to compare the combination of streptozotocin, tubercidin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) versus 5-FU alone in the treatment of adenocarcinoma and islet cell carcinoma of the pancreas. Twenty-nine were not evaluable. Thirty-six evaluable cases received 5-FU, and 40 received the combination, with no significant difference in time to progression or survival. Toxicity in the two regimens was somewhat different but was essentially similar in magnitude. Results indicate no benefit in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with the three-drug combination over 5-FU alone. All of the islet cell tumor patients benefited from the combination by response or arrest of progression of disease. Further study should be directed toward the use of this combination in the treatment of functioning and non-functioning islet cell tumors of the pancreas.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1978

[Proposed model for evaluation of toxicity in antineoplastic chemo-hormonotherapy].

A detailed code for the evaluation of side-effects due to antiblastics in accordance with clinical, pharmacological and chronobiological parameters is described. Eight types of toxicity are recognised: systemic or local, cutaneous and adnexal, gastroenteric, haematochemical, cardiovascular, respiratory, genital and urinary, and nervous. Improvement of the objectivity and comparability of results in clinical oncology is proposed by means of a balanced points system for the expression of such effects, and methods for the summary expression of the toxicity of a single case or a uniform group of cases. The method of evaluation proposed also permits statistical comparison between different treatment protocols.

Alopecia↗

PubMed2026

Comparative analysis of distinct genomic landscapes in young-onset gBRCA1/2 breast cancer.

Carriers of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (gBRCA1/2 PVs) have elevated young-onset breast cancer risk. To define the pretreatment genomic landscapes of young-onset gBRCA-associated breast cancer, we evaluated 136 treatment-naive tumors diagnosed before age 50 in the prospective POSH study and 66 noncarriers from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Using whole-exome sequencing, we analyzed somatic variation, allele-specific loss of heterozygosity (asLOH), homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), and single-base substitution (SBS) signatures. gBRCA1 and gBRCA2 breast cancers had high rates of asLOH but differed significantly in average HRD scores and median SBS composition of signatures SBS1 (aging-associated), SBS18 (ROS-associated), and SBS3 (HRD-associated). Compared with gBRCA2 tumors, gBRCA1 tumors with asLOH were significantly enriched for alterations in hallmark ROS, DNA repair, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition pathways. In ER-positive, HER2-negative tumors from gBRCA1/2 carriers compared with noncarriers, we found significant enrichment of RB1, TP53, FAT1, and MYC single-nucleotide variants, indels, and copy number variants associated with CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) resistance. Together, these findings demonstrate significant differences between gBRCA1- and gBRCA2-associated breast cancers, and preexisting CDK4/6i resistance mechanisms, supporting prospective trials comparing individualized therapy for gBRCA1 versus gBRCA2 carriers and comparing poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors versus CDK4/6i for ER-positive gBRCA1/2-associated breast cancer.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Transcriptomic Profiling of Canine Testicular Leydig Cell Tumors Uncovers Key Upregulated Gene Pathways.

Total RNA was isolated from sections of healthy testes and Leydig cell tumors of mixed-breed dogs using TMA Master II device. The RNA-seq libraries were sequenced on the Illumina platform. Following differential expression analysis, Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) were applied with quality control obtained using FastQC and Trimmomatic. This analysis revealed 1500 transcripts, including 928 upregulated and 168 downregulated genes. The results demonstrated that a significant proportion of these differentially expressed genes are directly involved in the control of sex steroid production (CYP11A1, STAR, and 3β-HSD3B1) or tube formation, angiogenesis, and extracellular matrix remodeling in interstitial cells (ESM1, FGG, and VEGFA). Moreover, we identified the upregulation of transcripts responsible for neurotransmitter or neuroendocrine signaling (SLC6A4, GRIN2C, GABRB3) and cholesterol metabolism and its regulation (GPX3, MSMO1, DHCR24). These genes were strongly associated with the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)-Protein Kinase B (Akt) cascade and extracellular matrix interactions, features shared with various malignancies. Alterations in estrogen and relaxin signaling appear to be distinctive, understudied mechanisms specific to canine Leydig cell tumors. Concurrently, downregulated genes (e.g., DMRTC2, SEMA3C, ALOX12) were linked with cell differentiation, signaling and immunoregulatory pathway suppression involved in tumorigenesis. A complex transcriptomic profile of canine Leydig cell tumors was developed, revealing a conserved oncogenic core shared in some aspects with human malignancies alongside unique species-specific alterations. Findings seem to be useful for identifying novel diagnostic biomarkers and targeted therapies in veterinary oncology, establishing canine reproductive tissues as a valuable comparative biomedical model for research in human.

Leydig cell tumor↗