PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “craniosynostosis”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Standardized evaluation and documentation of findings in patients with craniosynostosis.

Surgical correction of craniosynostosis is usually performed according to standard procedures. However, a standard for clinical examination and report of findings for patients with craniosynostosis does not exist as yet. To compare findings from different hospitals, a documentation system was developed by a national craniosynostosis group. This system comprises a two-page document, clinical photographs, radiographs, CT scans, anthropometric measurements and molecular genetic findings. Data from craniosynostosis patients collected from participating hospitals are stored in a database, which facilitates online access.The documentation system was developed in cooperation with the group during 3 years since 1996. It was evaluated as being practicable and reliable and enables a comparability of findings reported in different hospitals. Molecular genetic analysis was found to support the investigation of patients with craniosynostosis and should therefore be integrated in the clinical evaluation. Copyright 2001 European Association for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1988

An epidemiologic study of craniosynostosis: risk indicators for the occurrence of craniosynostosis in Colorado.

This population-based case-control study was designed to investigate risk indicators for the occurrence of the birth defect craniosynostosis in Colorado. A total of 173 children who underwent craniectomy for craniosynostosis and 759 children without craniosynostosis were included in the study. Multivariable logistic regression analysis of birth certificate data showed that male sex (odds ratio (OR) = 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.1-2.2), maternal five-year age "increase" (OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.1-1.5), plural birth (OR = 3.0, 95% CI = 1.2-7.1) and black maternal race (OR = 0.0, 95 per cent CI = 0.0-0.6) were independently associated with craniosynostosis. There was a weak positive association between craniosynostosis and the altitude of the town closest to the maternal residence, but no association was found with maternal education, marital status, number of previous births, or previous pregnancy termination. The association of craniosynostosis with plural birth is consistent with the hypothesis of fetal head constraint.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2006

Testing causal mechanisms of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis using path analysis of cranial contents in rabbits with uncorrected craniosynostosis.

OBJECTIVE: Various causal mechanisms of familial nonsyndromic craniosynostosis have been presented. One hypothesis suggests that overproduction of bone at the suture is the primary origin of craniosynostosis, which affects brain and cranial growth secondarily through altered intracranial pressure (Primary Suture Fusion Model). Other hypotheses suggest that decreased cranial base growth or abnormal brain growth are the primary cause of craniosynostosis (Cranial Base, Brain Parenchyma Models, respectively). This study was designed to investigate which model best describes neurocranial changes associated with craniosynostosis in a rabbit model through multivariate path analysis. DESIGN: Serial magnetic resonance imaging scans and intracranial pressure measurements were obtained at 10, 25, and 42 days of age from 18 rabbits: six controls, six with delayed-onset synostosis, and six with early-onset synostosis. Five variables were collected from each rabbit: calvarial thickness at the affected suture, cranial base length, brain volume, cerebrospinal fluid volume, and intracranial pressure. This data set was used to test causal pathway relationships generated by the proposed models. Goodness of fit was measured by experimental group for each model. RESULTS: Primary Suture Fusion Model best explained the variables in both delayed-onset and early-onset synostotic rabbits (Goodness of fit = 93%, 97%, respectively). Cranial Base Model (Goodness of fit = 94%) best explained the data in control rabbits. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that the primary site of craniosynostosis in craniosynostotic rabbits is most likely the synostosed suture. Other cranial vault anomalies are most likely secondary compensatory changes. Results of the present study may provide insight regarding the causal pathway of craniosynostosis.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Indication for and surgical outcomes of the distraction method in various types of craniosynostosis. Advantages, disadvantages, and current concepts for surgical strategy in the treatment of craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: Various surgical techniques for the treatment of craniosynostosis using distraction devices have been described over the last few years and we have applied these procedures in seven patients with varying types of craniosynostosis. The aim of this report is to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of these surgical methods and to discuss current concepts for the surgical strategy in the treatment of craniosynostosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 2001 to March 2003, 25 patients with craniosynostosis were examined. Among them, 7 patients, 5 with Apert syndrome, 1 with Crouzon disease, and 1 with multiple-synostosis, underwent surgical treatment using the distraction method with internal distraction devices, according to our treatment strategy for craniosynostosis. All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative evaluations, which included the patient's neurological state, developmental quotient (DQ), and three-dimensional CT (3D-CT). RESULTS: The timing of the procedures undertaken was between the ages of 1 year 5 months and 12 years 6 months (mean age 4 years 11 months). Five patients had received previous treatment and this procedure was used as a secondary operation. Postoperative distraction distances varied from 7 to 20.5 mm (mean distraction distance: 14 mm). Satisfactory cranial volume expansion and aesthetically pleasing morphological states were achieved in all cases. Regarding complications, one patient required re-operation because of dislocation of the device and skin erosion caused by infection around the penetrated wound. Finally, in a second patient a distortion of the device occurred, but no re-operation was needed. CONCLUSION: The advantage of the distraction method is its applicability for Toddler or Elder Children Calvarial Reconstruction to correct cosmetic and functional problems. One disadvantage is the difficulty in using it for Infantile Calvarial Normalization because of thin calvarial bones and the necessity for re-operation to remove the device, which may result in it becoming a "fixation procedure," essentially contraindicated for the fast-developing brain and calvarias. However, the efficacy of this procedure is that the many advantages outweigh the disadvantages as sufficient calvarial expansion and good results using the distraction method, especially in toddler and elder children age groups, can be achieved.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1996

Craniosynostosis, Philadelphia type: a new autosomal dominant syndrome with sagittal craniosynostosis and syndactyly of the fingers and toes.

The acrocephalosyndactyly syndromes (ACS) are a group of clinically similar disorders that share the manifestations of craniosynostosis and a variety of hand and foot anomalies. Here we report on a 5-generation kindred segregating sagittal craniosynostosis and syndactyly of the fingers and the toes in an autosomal dominant manner. The anomalies seen in this kindred comprise a syndrome distinct from other craniosynostosis syndromes. For this novel syndrome, we propose the name craniosynostosis, Philadelphia type.

Acrocephalosyndactylia↗
PubMed1985

A craniosynostosis in a boy with a del(7)(p15.3p21.3): assignment by deletion mapping of the critical segment for craniosynostosis to the mid-portion of 7p21.

A tiny interstitial deletion of 7p was found in a 5-month-old boy with a craniosynostosis and many anomalies. His karyotype was 46,XY,del(7)(p15.3p21.3). Here we present not only further evidence of an association between craniosynostosis and 7p monosomy, but also deletion mapping to indicate that the critical segment for craniosynostosis lies in the mid-portion of 7p21, that is at 7p21.2 or the proximal part of 7p21.3.

Chromosome Banding↗
PubMed1996

The role of bone centers in the pathogenesis of craniosynostosis: an embryologic approach using CT measurements in isolated craniosynostosis and Apert and Crouzon syndromes.

This paper describes the role of the displacement of bone centers, i.e., the tubers, in the pathogenesis of craniosynostosis. This displacement was studied in 54 patients with isolated or syndromic craniosynostosis in the form of CT scans as well as in two dry neonate skulls with Apert syndrome. For comparison, 49 fetal and 8 normal infant dry skulls were studied. Our investigation was restricted to the coronal and metopic sutures. The results showed a significantly more occipital localization of the frontal bone center and a more frontal localization of the parietal bone center at the side of a synostotic coronal suture in the isolated form as well as in Apert syndrome. In contrast, this was not the case in Crouzon syndrome, thus showing that these two syndromes have a different pathogenesis. For trigonocephaly, a more anteromedial localization of the frontal bone centers was found.

Acrocephalosyndactylia↗
PubMed1997

Craniosynostosis associated with FGFR3 pro250arg mutation results in a range of clinical presentations including unisutural sporadic craniosynostosis.

Several mutations involving the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene family have been identified in association with phenotypically distinct forms of craniosynostosis. One such point mutation, resulting in the substitution of proline by arginine in a critical region of the linker region between the first and second immunoglobulin-like domains, is associated with highly specific phenotypic consequences in that mutation at this point in FGFR1 results in Pfeiffer syndrome and analogous mutation in FGFR2 results in Apert syndrome. We now show that a much more variable clinical presentation accompanies analogous mutation in the FGFR3 gene. Specifically, mental retardation, apparently unrelated to the management of the craniosynostosis, appears to be a variable clinical consequence of this FGFR3 mutation.

Acrocephalosyndactylia↗
PubMed1977

Genetic perspectives on craniosynostosis and syndromes with craniosynostosis.

Thirty-seven syndromes in which craniosynostosis is a feature are presented in tabular form, allowing the clinician to rapidly identify a given syndrome and gain immediate access to the pertinent literature. A plea is made to delineate unknown genesis syndromes with craniosynostosis as rapidly as possible. As an unknown genesis syndrome becomes delineated, its phenotypic spectru, its natural history, and its inheritance pattern or risk of recurrence become known, allowing for better patient care and family counseling.

Craniosynostoses↗
PubMed1994

Timing of treatment for craniosynostosis and facio-craniosynostosis: a 20-year experience.

The timing of surgery for craniosynostosis is still controversial. Having used the same basic techniques since 1973, and having done follow-up on the growth of our 983 operated patients, we thought it useful to report our protocol. Early frontocranial remodelling is performed between 2 and 4 months for brachycephalies, but the other craniosynostoses are operated on between 6 and 12 months of age. When diagnosis is made later, we perform the same operations until 4 years of age, with some modifications, such as a tongue in groove advancement for brachycephalies, and a complete closure of the bony defects after 2 years of age. Later on, facial distortion and frontal sinus development complicate the surgery. For syndromal craniofacial synostosis, we prefer to perform a two-step operation: forehead advancement first, facial advancement later, to avoid the risk of frontal osteitis. The frontofacial monobloc is indicated, in our opinion, for severe exorbitism in infancy but otherwise we prefer a two-stage procedure. Facial bipartition is necessary to narrow the upper face and widen the maxilla in Apert's syndrome.

Acrocephalosyndactylia↗
PubMed2004

Progressive postnatal craniosynostosis and increased intracranial pressure.

Since its first description by Virchow in 1851, craniosynostosis has been known as a potentially serious condition resulting in premature fusion of skull sutures. Traditionally, craniosynostosis has been regarded as an event that occurs early in fetal development, resulting in a skull shape at birth that is determined by the suture or sutures involved. In recent years, a different form of craniosynostosis has been observed. Patients initially come to the attention of physicians because they exhibit midface hypoplasia or occasionally hypertelorism. The affected individuals all have a normal skull shape and open sutures in infancy but develop multiple-suture craniosynostosis postnatally, ultimately requiring surgical correction. These cases are significant because, although the patients do not initially display the physical manifestations of craniosynostosis, they frequently develop increased intracranial pressure, which can have devastating consequences. Unless these patients are recognized and vigilant follow-up monitoring is instituted at an early age, permanent impairment can result. A retrospective chart review study was conducted, and patients with multiple-suture craniosynostosis who developed symptoms of increased intracranial pressure were selected. The patients were divided into two groups, namely, those with normal sutures and/or head shape at birth (progressive craniosynostosis) (n = 15) and those with abnormal head shapes at birth (classic syndromic craniosynostosis) (n = 12). Clinical and radiological findings typically used to monitor the development of increased intracranial pressure were reviewed for both groups and compared. In addition, mutational analyses were performed. All patients with progressive postnatal craniosynostosis demonstrated clinical, radiological, or ophthalmological evidence of increased intracranial pressure, requiring skull expansion. Those patients displayed papilledema, anterior fontanelle bulge, and thumbprinting more often than did the patients with classic craniosynostosis. Thirteen of 15 patients were given the clinical diagnosis of Crouzon syndrome, which raises the question of whether such patients represent a subset of patients with this syndrome. Mutational analyses for the patients with progressive craniosynostosis demonstrated that, of 13 patients tested, 11 had mutations in exon 7 or 9 of FGFR2, which is a common site of mutations in Crouzon syndrome. The traditional indications of increased intracranial pressure used to monitor patients with classic craniosynostosis can be used to monitor patients with progressive postnatal craniosynostosis, particularly anterior fontanelle bulge, papilledema, and thumbprinting. It is thought that regular monitoring of these characteristics may lead to earlier diagnosis and allow for surgical intervention before the development of undesirable outcomes. It is important for clinicians to be aware of this group of patients, because any delay in diagnosis and treatment can result in severe consequences for the patients.

Child↗
PubMed1999

Intracranial volume change in craniosynostosis.

OBJECT: There is still controversy regarding the optimum time to perform surgery for craniosynostosis. Some recommend surgery soon after birth and others delay until the age of 12 months. Intracranial pressure has been measured in an attempt to provide a scientific rationale, but many questions remain unanswered. To date, little attention has been given to intracranial volume and its changes during the first few years of life in children with craniosynostosis. The authors' goal was to focus on intracranial volume during this period and to compare measurements obtained in patients with craniosynostosis with measurements obtained in healthy individuals. METHODS: Using the technique of segmentation, the intracranial volume of 84 children with various forms of craniosynostosis was measured on preoperative computerized tomography scans. The change in average volume that occurs with increasing age was calculated and compared with a model of normal intracranial volume growth. The age at presentation for children with craniosynostosis was 1 to 39 months; 76% of the patients were younger than 12 months. In eight patients in whom only one cranial expansion procedure was performed, postoperative intracranial volumes were measured as well. Several interesting observations emerged. 1) There was little difference in head growth between boys and girls with craniosynostosis during the first few months of life. After the age of 12 months, however, the difference in intracranial volume normally seen between the two genders was observed in the craniosynostosis group as well. 2) Excluding children with complex pansynostosis, who have smaller heads, children with all other types of craniosynostosis have similar head growth after the 1st year of life, with no difference between the number of and type of suture affected. Children with Apert's syndrome develop greater than normal intracranial volumes after the 1st year of life. 3) Although children with craniosynostosis are born with a smaller intracranial volume, by the age of 6 months volume has reached normal levels, and from that point on volume follows the pattern of normal head growth. 4) Children who presented after the age of 6 months and later developed recurrent craniosynostosis after initial successful treatment had a small intracranial volume at their initial presentation. 5) Of the patients whose postoperative intracranial volumes were measured, all but one had preoperative volumes at or above normal values, and their postoperative volumes were considerably higher than normal for their age. These children all followed a growth curve parallel to that of healthy children but at higher volume value. One patient with a smaller-than-normal initial intracranial volume was surgically treated at a very young age and, despite cranial expansion surgery, postoperative volume did not reach normal levels. It is postulated that this was due to the fact that the operation was performed at a time when craniosynostosis was still active. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that the underlying mechanism leading to craniosynostosis and constriction of head volume "exhausts" its effect during the first few months of life. Measurement of intracranial volume in clinical practice could be used to "fine tune" the optimum time for surgery. In late-presenting children, this may be useful in predicting possible recurrence.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Sutural biology and the correlates of craniosynostosis.

The purpose of this paper is to provide a new perspective on craniosynostosis by correlating what is known about sutural biology with the events of craniosynostosis per se. A number of key points emerge from this analysis: 1) Sutural initiation may take place by overlapping, which results in beveled sutures, or by end-to-end approximation, which produces nonbeveled, end-to-end sutures. All end-to-end sutures occur in the midline (e.g., sagittal and metopic) probably because embryonic biomechanical forces on either side of the initiating suture tend to be equal in magnitude. A correlate appears to be that only synostosed sutures of the midline have pronounced bony ridging. 2) Long-term histologic observations of the sutural life cycle call into question the number of layers within sutures. The structure varies not only in different sutures, but also within the same suture over time. 3) Few, if any, of the many elegant experimental research studies in the field of sutural biology have increased our understanding of craniosynostosis per se. An understanding of the pathogenesis of craniosynostosis requires a genetic animal model with primary craniosynostosis and molecular techniques to understand the gene defect. This may allow insight into pathogenetic mechanisms involved in primary craniosynostosis. It may prove to be quite heterogeneous at the basic level. 4) The relationship between suture closure, cessation of growth, and functional demands across sutures poses questions about various biological relationships. Two conclusions are provocative. First, cessation of growth does not necessarily, or always lead to fusion of sutures. Second, although patent sutures aid in the growth process, some growth can take place after suture closure. 5) In an affected suture, craniosynostosis usually begins at a single point and then spreads along the suture. This has been shown by serial sectioning and calls into question results of studies in which the affected sutures are only histologically sampled. 6) Craniosynostosis is etiologically and pathogenetically heterogeneous. Known human causes are reviewed. Is craniosynostosis simply normal suture closure commencing too early?(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Long-term osseous morphologic outcome of surgically treated unilateral coronal craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral coronal craniosynostosis has characteristic osseous dysmorphology that persists into adulthood if untreated. Knowledge of the long-term in vivo osseous morphologic outcome of surgically treated unilateral coronal craniosynostosis patients is limited. The purpose of this study was to define the osseous morphology of adolescent patients who underwent surgery for unilateral coronal craniosynostosis in infancy, compared with both their 1-year postoperative morphology and the morphology of other individuals with untreated unilateral coronal craniosynostosis. METHODS: Three populations of unilateral coronal craniosynostosis were studied: group 1, patients with surgical treatment of unilateral coronal craniosynostosis in infancy who had reached dentoskeletal maturity, ranging in age from 13.5 to 32.7 years (n= 9); group 2, individuals with untreated unilateral coronal craniosynostosis, ranging in age from 1.1 to 21 years (n= 11); and group 3, a subset of group 1 patients 1 year after surgical correction of unilateral coronal craniosynostosis, ranging in age from 1.2 to 2.6 years (n= 6). Data from high-resolution, thin-slice computed tomographic scans of the head were analyzed. Thirty-five reproducible osseous landmarks were recorded as three-dimensional coordinates using ETDIPS imaging software. Nonmidline landmarks were designated as either ipsilateral or contralateral to the synostosis. One researcher performed all landmarking with high intrarater reliability (average error, <2 mm). Data from the three groups were analyzed for asymmetry using Euclidean distance matrix analysis techniques. RESULTS: Euclidean distance matrix analysis asymmetry analysis demonstrated more statistically significant ipsilateral-contralateral asymmetric pairs in group 1 (68 of 135) than in group 3 (25 of 135), but fewer statistically significant ipsilateral-contralateral asymmetric pairs than in group 2 (93 of 135). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of unilateral coronal craniosynostosis in infancy results in a less asymmetric craniofacial skeleton in adolescence than nontreatment. However, patients who have been followed to dentoskeletal maturity have a greater degree of asymmetry than those evaluated at 1 year postoperatively. These results support the conclusion that with time there is a partial reversion to the untreated phenotype.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Intellectual outcomes in children and adolescents with syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: Craniosynostosis, the premature fusion of the skull bones, is a congenital deformity that has functional and morphologic implications. Cranial vault reconstructive surgery is required to improve skull shape and increase intracranial volume. Craniosynostosis disorders carry a risk of brain insult and associated neurologic and cognitive dysfunction. This study investigated the long-term effects of craniosynostosis on intelligence in children and adolescents with syndromic and nonsyndromic disorders who had undergone cranial expansion surgery during infancy. METHODS: Global intellectual evaluations were obtained on 31 children aged 7 to 16 years with mixed syndromic (n = 13) and nonsyndromic (n = 18) craniosynostoses. Results of intellectual assessment were compared with norm-referenced data. Age at surgery and gender comparisons were also made. RESULTS: Mean +/- SD general intelligence quotient of the total sample was within the average range (intelligence quotient, 95.6 +/- 21.2). Intellectual functioning was significantly lower in children with syndromic craniosynostosis (mean intelligence quotient, 83.1 +/- 21.9) than nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (mean intelligence quotient, 104.7 +/- 15.8). The majority of children with syndromic craniosynostosis (77 percent) were of normal intelligence. Children with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis did not display obvious evidence of intellectual dysfunction. There were no age or gender differences in intellectual outcomes in this sample. CONCLUSIONS: Findings are contrary to the historical impression that has regarded syndromic craniosynostosis as synonymous with intellectual disability. Children with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis are of normal intelligence during their school-age years.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Hydrocephalus and craniosynostosis.

OBJECT: A retrospective study of 1727 cases of craniosynostosis was undertaken to determine the interrelationship between abnormal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) hydrodynamics and craniosynostosis. METHODS: The patients were divided into two groups: nonsyndromic craniosynostosis and syndromic craniosynostosis. Cases of occipital plagiocephaly without suture synostosis and cases of shunt-induced craniosynostosis were excluded from the study. The majority of patients (1297) were treated surgically for their cranial deformity; 95% of these patients had a postoperative follow-up review period lasting 5 years. Clinical and radiographic charts covering the time from presentation through the follow-up period were reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal intracranial CSF hydrodynamics was found in 8.1% of the patients (3.4% of whom had received shunts and 4.5% of whom had not). Three types of CSF hydrodynamic disturbance were observed: progressive hydrocephalus with ventricular dilation, nonprogressive ventriculomegaly, and dilation of the subarachnoid spaces. Hydrocephalus occurred much more frequently in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis (12.1%) than in those with isolated craniosynostosis (0.3%). In fact, patients with kleeblattschädel exhibited hydrocephalus as a constant feature and patients with Crouzon's syndrome were far more likely to have hydrocephalus than those with other syndromes. In Apert's syndrome, ventricular dilation occurred very frequently, but it was almost always nonprogressive in nature. In most cases of syndromic craniosynostosis, venous sinus obstruction and/or chronic tonsillar herniation were found. Their role in the pathophysiology of hydrocephalus in craniosynostosis is discussed.

Acrocephalosyndactylia↗