PubMed HealthSearch

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “cross-domain profiling”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Metax enables accurate cross-domain taxonomic profiling of metagenomes.

Taxonomic profiling is fundamental to microbiome research, yet achieving high species-level accuracy remains challenging for complex communities that span bacteria, viruses, eukaryotes, and archaea, and these limitations are exacerbated in low-biomass, host-dominated samples. We introduce Metax, a cross-domain taxonomic profiler that integrates coverage-based probabilistic modeling with an expectation-maximization framework to distinguish true microbial signals from artifacts. Across >600 samples from host-associated, environmental, wastewater, and low-biomass clinical settings, including benchmarks with limited reference representation, Metax improved profiling accuracy, achieving on average 55% higher F1 scores and 45% lower Bray-Curtis dissimilarity than other methods. Moreover, this broad evaluation demonstrated that Metax resolved bacterial and viral signatures of peri-implantitis in oral microbiomes and revealed signals suggestive of reagent-borne contaminants and reference misassemblies in plasma-cell-free DNA. By leveraging genome-wide coverage evidence, Metax enables robust cross-domain profiling across diverse sample types and sequencing depths, including settings where reference databases are highly incomplete.

abundance estimation

Unveiling microbial risks in Chinese household dust: a comprehensive analysis from absolute abundance to virulence unit.

BACKGROUND: People spend the majority of their lives indoors, yet the risk and virulence potential of household microbiota remain largely unexplored, particularly in developing countries. RESULTS: Here, we conducted a nationwide survey on both dust samples and health information across 118 Chinese households. The microbiota composition and its functional units were analyzed using absolute 16S rRNA/ITS sequencing, metagenomics, and metaproteomics. Cross-domain network analysis of the core microbial communities revealed robust co-occurrence patterns in household dust. The mean absolute abundance of potentially pathogenic bacteria and fungi in households was 2.39 × 105 and 2.83 × 106 DNA copies/g dust. The potentially pathogenic community was primarily influenced by latitude, relative humidity, and average temperature. Although total absolute abundance was substantially lower in urban areas, the relative abundance of potentially pathogenic bacteria was markedly higher compared to rural environments. While urban-rural differences existed, the underlying statistical drivers were the environmental variables. The absolute abundance of potential pathogens was significantly associated with the prevalence of rhinitis, wheeze, and dermatitis in 266 participants. Children were identified as the highest-risk group from inhalation exposure of average daily dose. A total of 170 bacterial, 223 fungal virulence factors (VFs), and 370 antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) were detected in dust and dust extracellular vesicle (EV)-associated DNA. EV-associated cargoes contributed 47.13% to the bacterial VF profiles, 11.90% to fungal VF profiles, and 44.45% to ARG profiles. Metaproteomic analysis confirmed the presence of VF profiles in dust EVs, which was further verified by curated proteomics data from 35 household pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive, quantitative framework linking indoor microbial exposure to health risks, highlighting EVs as a non-negligible, novel, extracellular mechanistic pathway for health impact in household environments. Video Abstract.

Child

NeuroOmics-Net: An interpretable multimodal deep learning framework for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and progression prediction using neuroimaging, EEG, and genomic data.

Accurate diagnosis and progression prediction of Alzheimer's disease (AD) remain challenging due to the heterogeneous nature of the disease, which involves structural brain degeneration, electrophysiological dysfunction, and molecular dysregulation. Most existing deep learning approaches rely on a single modality or limited multimodal combinations, thereby failing to capture the complex cross-domain interactions underlying AD progression. Furthermore, the scarcity of large-scale datasets containing synchronized neuroimaging, electrophysiological, and genomic measurements restricts the development of comprehensive multimodal diagnostic systems. To address these challenges, this study proposes NeuroOmics-Net, a multimodal deep learning framework for Alzheimer's disease analysis that integrates structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI), electroencephalography (EEG), and gene expression data. The proposed framework combines a Hierarchical Multi-View Encoder (HME) for modality-specific feature extraction, a Cross-Omics Attention Fusion (CAF) module for adaptive integration of complementary biomarkers, and a Disease Progression Graph Learning (DPGL) module for modeling progression-related relationships across biological domains. To facilitate cross-modal integration from independent cohorts, Regularized Canonical Correlation Analysis (RCCA) is employed to align heterogeneous feature representations within a shared latent space. Experiments were conducted using publicly available datasets from ADNI, PhysioNet, and GEO repositories comprising 1120 diagnosis-aligned samples. The proposed framework achieved 94.3% classification accuracy and an AUC of 0.975 for distinguishing normal controls (NC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer's disease subjects, while attaining 93.7% accuracy for predicting conversion from stable mild cognitive impairment (sMCI) to progressive mild cognitive impairment (pMCI). However, a fairness sensitivity analysis using stratified demographic reweighting revealed accuracy ranging from 90.8% (low-education, high-comorbidity proxy subgroup) to 96.1% (low-risk, high-reserve proxy subgroup), a demographic parity gap of 5.3 percentage points, indicating that overall accuracy reflects a performance ceiling in a relatively homogeneous research cohort rather than a realistic estimate for demographically diverse clinical populations. Comparative evaluations demonstrated consistent improvements over state-of-the-art unimodal and multimodal deep learning models. Interpretability analysis further identified clinically relevant biomarkers, including hippocampal and entorhinal atrophy, theta-alpha EEG alterations, and APOE-associated molecular pathways. Because sMRI, EEG, and gene expression data were sourced from separate, unpaired cohorts with no subjects possessing all three synchronized measurements, all reported cross-modal associations reflect population-level statistical correspondence across diagnosis-matched groups rather than within-subject physiological coupling; no claim of intra-individual causal cross-modal interaction is made. These findings demonstrate that NeuroOmics-Net provides an effective computer-aided framework for multimodal biomedical data processing and Alzheimer's disease analysis. By integrating neuroimaging, electrophysiological, and genomic information, the proposed approach enables accurate diagnosis, progression prediction, and biologically interpretable decision support for clinical and translational applications.

Humans

Penalised regression improves imputation of cell-type specific expression using RNA-seq data from mixed cell populations compared to domain-specific methods.

Gene expression studies often use bulk RNA sequencing of mixed cell populations because single cell or sorted cell sequencing may be prohibitively expensive. However, mixed cell studies may miss expression patterns that are restricted to specific cell populations. Computational deconvolution can be used to estimate cell fractions from bulk expression data and infer average cell-type expression in a set of samples (e.g., cases or controls), but imputing sample-level cell-type expression is required for more detailed analyses, such as relating expression to quantitative traits, and is less commonly addressed. Here, we assessed the accuracy of imputing sample-level cell-type expression using a real dataset where mixed peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and sorted (CD4, CD8, CD14, CD19) RNA sequencing data were generated from the same subjects (N=158), and pseudobulk datasets synthesised from eQTLgen single cell RNA-seq data. We compared three domain-specific methods, CIBERSORTx, bMIND and debCAM/swCAM, and two cross-domain machine learning methods, multiple response LASSO and ridge, that had not been used for this task before. We also assessed the methods according to their ability to recover differential gene expression (DGE) results. LASSO/ridge showed higher sensitivity but lower specificity for recovering DGE signals seen in observed data compared to deconvolution methods, although LASSO/ridge had higher area under curves than deconvolution methods. Machine learning methods have the potential to outperform domain-specific methods when suitable training data are available.

Humans