PubMed HealthSearch

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “efficacy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Vaccine efficacy of NVX-CoV2373 against SARS-CoV-2 infection in adolescents in the USA: an ancillary study to a phase 3, observer-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Although existing COVID-19 vaccines are known to be highly effective against severe disease and death, data are needed to assess their ability to reduce SARS-CoV-2 infection. We aimed to estimate the efficacy of the NVX-CoV2373 protein subunit vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infection, regardless of symptoms, among adolescents. METHODS: We performed an ancillary observational study (SNIFF) to the phase 3, observer-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled PREVENT-19 trial that assessed vaccine efficacy against symptomatic COVID-19 in the USA. Participants in the PREVENT-19 trial included healthy adolescents aged 12-17 years and with no history of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. They were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either the NVX-CoV2373 (Novavax, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) vaccine (immediate NVX-CoV2373 group) or placebo (delayed NVX-CoV2373 group) on days 0 and 21 (initial series). After 2 months, in a crossover series, participants received two doses, 21 days apart, of the intervention that they did not receive in their initial series. Participants at 47 of the PREVENT-19 sites were invited to participate in the SNIFF study and self-collect nasal swabs at home twice weekly for SARS-CoV-2 testing to assess vaccine efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 infection. This primary outcome was defined as the first identification of SARS-CoV-2 detected by RT-PCR, regardless of symptoms, with onset within 4 weeks after the second dose of the initial vaccination series until the second dose of the crossover series. Secondary outcomes were vaccine efficacy against asymptomatic and minimally symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, durability of vaccine efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 infection, and durability of vaccine efficacy against asymptomatic and minimally symptomatic infections. Outcomes were analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all participants without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and was restricted to participants enrolled within 4 weeks of the second dose of the primary (primary analysis population) or crossover (post-crossover analysis population) series. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04611802). FINDINGS: Between June 1 and Dec 17, 2021, 1196 (53·2%) of the 2247 adolescent participants recruited in the PREVENT-19 trial enrolled in the SNIFF study. The primary analysis population included 471 participants in the immediate NVX-CoV2373 group and 220 in the delayed NVX-CoV2373 group. Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 14·9 cases per 100 person-years (95% CI 7·9-25·5) in the immediate group and 54·2 cases per 100 person-years (33·6-82·9) in the delayed group; vaccine efficacy was 73·5% (95% CI 47·1-86·7; p=0·0002). Incidence of minimally symptomatic or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection was 10·3 cases per 100 person-years (95% CI 4·7-19·6) in the immediate group and 36·1 cases per 100 person-years (19·8-60·7) in the delayed group; vaccine efficacy was 72·8% (95% CI 37·1-88·2; p=0·0023). After the second crossover dose, incidence of SARS-CoV-2 was 14·6 cases per 100 person-years (95% CI 8·6-23·0) in the immediate group (receiving placebo at crossover) and 9·1 cases per 100 person-years (3·0-21·3) in the delayed group, with a durability ratio of 160·3 (95% CI 59·5-431·6; p=0·35). Almost all infections after crossover were minimally symptomatic or asymptomatic, with a durability ratio of 151·4 (55·9-410·4; p=0·41). INTERPRETATION: Among adolescents participating in the PREVENT-19 trial during the delta (B.1.617.2) variant wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, the NVX-CoV2373 vaccine was highly efficacious against SARS-CoV-2 infection regardless of symptoms, indicating its potential to reduce the reservoir of infections that contribute to community transmission. FUNDING: US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and National Institutes of Health.

Adolescent

Efficacy of Advanced Therapies in Achieving Remission by Disease Location in Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We compared the efficacy of different advanced therapies by disease location in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Through a systematic review, we identified 14 randomized controlled trials in 3139 patients with moderate-to-severe CD who were treated with different advanced therapies vs placebo, and reported efficacy in inducing clinical remission, stratified by disease location (isolated colonic vs ileal disease, excluding ileocolonic disease). We grouped advanced therapies based on the primary mechanism of action: anti-interleukins, Janus kinase inhibitors (JAK inhibitors), anti-integrins, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists. We calculated treatment efficacy (drug vs placebo), overall and by drug class, for colonic vs ileal disease. RESULTS: Overall treatment efficacy of advanced therapies vs placebo was higher in patients with colonic (odds ratio [OR], 4.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.02-5.54) vs ileal CD (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.23-2.63; P < .001). By drug class, anti-interleukins demonstrated a higher efficacy in colonic disease (OR, 4.29; 95% CI, 2.77-6.64) vs ileal disease (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.44-3.70; P = .059), whereas no difference in efficacy was observed with anti-integrins (colonic vs ileal: OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 0.55-5.87 vs 2.10; 95% CI, 0.80-5.53; P = .84). For JAK inhibitors, efficacy was observed only in patients with isolated colonic disease (OR, 4.37; 95% CI, 2.67-7.15), but not in ileal disease (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.54-1.89; P < .001). All analyses had minimal to moderate heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of efficacy of advanced therapies for ileal CD is generally lower compared with isolated colonic CD, with JAK inhibitors showing particularly limited efficacy for ileal disease. These results may help inform treatment selection.

Humans

[The influence on efficacy of formaldehyd and phenol against bacterial cells I. Effect of drying, cations and pH-value (author's transl)].

1. When cells of E. coli and Staph. aureus are dried, the efficacy of phenol is reduced but the efficacy of formaldehyde is increased. 2. A change of the aw-value by addition of salts changes the efficacy of formaldehyde as well as that of phenol. For these tests the chlorides of various alkali and alkaline earth metals were used in different concentrations. 3. The optimal efficacy of phenol and formaldehyde within the tested concentration gradientis caused by different concentrations of the ions: In low concentrations the efficacy of formaldehyde is optimally increased, the efficacy of phenol, however, attains a minimum at this concentration range. By higher concentrations of ions the efficacy of phenol is increased, that of formaldehyde is reduced. 4. The position of the cations in the periodic system also plays a role in the influence on the efficacy of the phenol and formaldehyde respectively. The cations of the lower periods from the main groups I and II favour the damage to the cells by phenol, the cations of the higher periods favour the damage by formaldehyde.

Bacteria

Efficacy...what's that??

We need to develop techniques for measuring the usefulness of medical services. If resources are limited, and we cannot do all the diagnostic tests we would like to do, we must be able to select those that are most useful. To do this we need to known how to weigh benefits against risks and how to measure the worth of a given outcome. This article discusses efficacy, in diagnosis, management, and outcome. Diagnostic efficacy of a test is measured by its ability to change the probability of disease (pre- versus post-test likelihood). Management efficacy is a measure of how the test changes patient management. Outcome efficacy, which may take years to evaluate, is the ultimate yardstick of usefulness. Even though there are many problems in estimating the likelihood of a disease (subjectivity, varying terminology, etc.), physicians can make reasonably close estimates, as shown by the American College of Radiology's Efficacy Study, which analyzed the diagnostic process in 9000 cases. Efficacy studies may be a mixed blessing, however, as they may result in overly strict criteria and sweeping economic changes. They may be ignored because of the difficulty in following the "perfect" protocol for a given clinical situation, and it remains to be shown that they themselves are efficacious. Nevertheless, we are finally coming to grips with the question of how useful our tests are in patient management.

Cost-Benefit Analysis

The use of functional antagonism to determine whether beta-adrenoceptor agonists must have a lower efficacy than isoprenaline to be trachea-atria selective in vitro in guinea-pigs.

1 The relative efficacies of three trachea-atria selective beta-adrenoceptor agonists, fenoterol, Me 506 and Me 454, compared to isoprenaline, were determined on both trachea and atria of guinea-pigs. 2 On tracheal preparations the beta-adrenoceptor agonists were used as functional antagonists of carbachol and a comparison of the maximum shifts in the carbachol concentration-response line produced by each of the beta-adrenoceptor agonists provided a comparison of their efficacies. 3 On atrial preparations carbachol was used as a functional antagonist of the beta-adrenoceptor agonists and comparison of the maximum responses to the beta-adrenoceptor agonists in the presence of carbachol provided a comparison of their efficacies. 4 On trachea and atria the order of efficacy of the compounds was Me454 greater than Me506 greater than or equal to isoprenaline=fenoterol. 5. The results indicated that high efficacy in a non-catechol beta-adrenoceptor agonist is possible provided there is a favourable N-substituent group. 6 Since Me 454, Me 506 and fenoterol, which are trachea-atria selective, have effficacies equal to or greater than that of isoprenaline, which is non-selective, it is concluded that low efficacy in a compound is not essential for it to show trachea-atria selectivity in vitro in guinea-pigs.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists

Ibuprofen versus acetaminophen for acute mild-to-moderate pain management in pediatric populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of their efficacy.

UNLABELLED: Ibuprofen and acetaminophen are the most widely used analgesics in pediatric practice for the management of acute mild-to-moderate pain. Despite their widespread use, the comparative analgesic efficacy of these two agents in children remains a subject of ongoing debate, with existing evidence largely derived from heterogeneous clinical settings and small individual trials. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze randomized controlled trials comparing the analgesic efficacy of ibuprofen versus acetaminophen in pediatric populations with acute mild-to-moderate pain. A systematic literature search was conducted up to May 2026 in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The review was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-Children and Adolescents (PRISMA-C) 2026 reporting guideline. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials comparing ibuprofen with acetaminophen in children and adolescents (defined as individuals aged 0 to&#x2009;<&#x2009;18&#xa0;years) with acute pain, reporting at least one extractable efficacy outcome. Continuous outcomes were synthesized as standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) using random-effects models; dichotomous outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework. Eight randomized controlled trials enrolling 1325 participants were included. Three pediatric trials contributed to the primary continuous pain outcome meta-analysis (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;196 analyzable participants), yielding a pooled SMD of&#x2009;-&#x2009;0.28 (95% CI&#x2009;-&#x2009;0.57 to 0.00; p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.052; I2&#x2009;=&#x2009;0%), indicating a small effect favoring ibuprofen that did not reach conventional statistical significance. Given the small number of contributing studies (k&#x2009;=&#x2009;3), the I2 statistic should be interpreted with caution as it has limited power to detect heterogeneity in this context. For the dichotomous pain freedom outcome (2 trials, n&#x2009;=&#x2009;114), no significant difference was observed (pooled RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.53-1.99; p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.93; I2&#x2009;=&#x2009;0%). A prespecified sensitivity analysis including an adult soft-tissue injury trial attenuated the pooled effect toward the null (SMD&#x2009;-&#x2009;0.15, 95% CI&#x2009;-&#x2009;0.38 to 0.09; p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.23; I2&#x2009;=&#x2009;36.6%). Narrative synthesis of additional studies generally demonstrated comparable analgesic efficacy between the two agents across postoperative and outpatient pediatric settings. The overall certainty of evidence was rated as low for both primary outcomes, primarily due to imprecision and indirectness. CONCLUSION: Current evidence from randomized controlled trials does not demonstrate a superiority of ibuprofen over acetaminophen for acute mild-to-moderate pain management in children. Both agents appear to provide clinically meaningful analgesia across heterogeneous pediatric pain settings. The clinical choice between agents should be guided by individual patient factors, including contraindications to NSAIDs, the inflammatory nature of the pain etiology, and patient-specific characteristics. The low certainty of evidence underscores the need for adequately powered, methodologically rigorous trials to definitively establish the comparative efficacy of these two analgesics in the pediatric population. WHAT IS KNOWN: &#x2022; Ibuprofen and acetaminophen are the two most widely used non-opioid analgesics for acute mild-to-moderate pain in children, and both are recommended as first-line agents by major international guidelines. &#x2022; Prior meta-analyses in mixed pediatric-adult populations have suggested a modest analgesic advantage of ibuprofen over acetaminophen, but pediatric-specific evidence has remained limited and methodologically heterogeneous. WHAT IS NEW: &#x2022; This systematic review and meta-analysis, restricted to randomized controlled trials in pediatric populations, found that ibuprofen showed a small effect favoring pain reduction compared with acetaminophen (SMD&#x2009;-&#x2009;0.28, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.052), although this did not reach conventional statistical significance. &#x2022; The analgesic advantage of ibuprofen may be more pronounced in pain etiologies with a significant inflammatory component (e.g., fractures). At the same time, both agents appear broadly equivalent in most other acute pediatric pain settings, supporting individualized analgesic selection based on clinical context and patient-specific factors.

Humans

Artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Laos: a therapeutic efficacy study coupled with genomic and in vitro phenotypic analyses.

BACKGROUND: Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) have played a crucial role in decreasing the impact of malaria worldwide. Since 2005, artemether-lumefantrine (AL) has been the main first-line treatment for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Laos. Herein, we aimed to study the efficacy of AL in the context of malaria elimination in Laos. METHODS: Between Aug 1, 2019, and June 11, 2023, AL efficacy was evaluated in four provinces of southern Laos: Attapeu, Champassack, Salavan, and Savannakhet. Adults and children (aged 1-60 years) with microscopically confirmed P falciparum malaria received oral AL twice a day for 3 days, with follow-up on days 7, 14, 21, and 28. The primary outcome was PCR-adjusted adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) by day 28. Resistance to dihydroartemisinin (DHA) and lumefantrine (LM) was assessed by an in vitro phenotypic analysis, and mutations in P falciparum kelch13 (pfkelch13), P falciparum multidrug resistance 1 (pfmdr1), P falciparum plasmepsin 2 (pfpm2), and P falciparum chloroquine resistant transporter (pfcrt) were characterised in parasites collected from enrolled patients. Safety outcomes included the frequency and nature of adverse events and serious adverse events. FINDINGS: A total of 198 patients (median age 16 years [IQR 10-28]; 124 [63%] male and 74 [37%] female) were initially enrolled, of whom three were lost to follow-up, resulting in 195 patients who received the 3-day AL regimen. At day 28, the PCR-adjusted ACPR was 96% (95% CI 92-98), with a treatment failure rate of 2% (1-5) and a reinfection rate of 2% (1-5). Among the four PCR-confirmed recrudescent isolates, one showed markedly reduced LM susceptibility (LM 50% inhibitory concentration [IC50] 59&#xb7;9 nM, 2&#xb7;5 times higher than the median IC50 of other isolates) and high artemisinin resistance in vitro (ring-stage survival survival rate 35&#xb7;8%), which was associated with the pfkelch13 R539T mutation and day-3 microscopy-positive parasitaemia. Among 190 isolates with successfully determined pfkelch13 sequencing, nine (5%) carried the pfkelch13 mutation R539T and 43 (23%) carried the C580Y mutation, and both were associated with day-3 microscopy-positive parasitaemia (p=0&#xb7;044). No amplification of pfmdr1 or pfpm2, nor any mutations in pfmdr1 and pfcrt, were associated with treatment failure. INTERPRETATION: Our findings indicate the potential emergence of LM resistance in Laos. Although AL remains efficacious, vigilance for decreasing efficacy and close monitoring of LM efficacy should be considered to support the country's goal of eliminating malaria by 2030. Importantly, none of the known pfmdr1 or pfcrt haplotypes were uniquely associated with treatment failure, including the isolate with the highest LM IC50, underscoring the need to identify reliable molecular markers for LM resistance. FUNDING: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and The Global Fund.

Humans

Efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in Beh&#xe7;et's disease: A systematic literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Beh&#xe7;et's disease e (BD) is a chronic, relapsing, multisystem inflammatory disorder that if not successfully treated can lead to severe, organ or life-threatening complications. Despite treatment with glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, some patients still have refractory disease that mandates additional therapeutic options. The pathogenesis of BD involves dysregulated innate and adaptive immune responses with multiple cytokines signaling through the Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway. By targeting multiple inflammatory pathways, JAK inhibitors have emerged as a promising therapeutic option. However, current evidence remains limited and heterogeneous. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review to evaluate their efficacy and safety in BD. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO registration: CRD420261381955). PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to March 2026. Original clinical studies evaluating Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in BD were included. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Due to heterogeneity, results were synthesized narratively, focusing on efficacy and safety outcomes. RESULTS: Seventeen studies (99 patients) were included, predominantly case reports and small observational cohorts with overall high methodological quality. All evaluated tofacitinib, baricitinib, or upadacitinib, with no data on other JAK inhibitors. Patients were highly treatment-refractory, with prior failure of conventional and biologic therapies. Upadacitinib was the most frequently studied agent and demonstrated an overall response rate of 85.2% and complete remission in 59.3% in a multi-center study. Efficacy was observed across multiple domains, with the most consistent responses in intestinal disease, including clinical and endoscopic remission, alongside frequent glucocorticoid-sparing effects. Safety findings were consistent with known JAK inhibitor safety profiles, with mainly mild to moderate infections and manageable laboratory abnormalities, and no clear signal for increased thrombotic events, although follow-up was limited. CONCLUSION: JAK inhibitors demonstrate promising efficacy in BD, particularly in refractory and multisystem disease. The most consistent evidence of efficacy was observed in gastrointestinal involvement, whereas data for other disease domains remain limited. Their safety profile appears consistent with existing data, although further follow up and validation is required. High-quality randomized controlled studies are an imminent need to study the potential role of JAK inhibitors in BD.

Humans

Efficacy and safety of Ruxolitinib-based combination therapy in the patients with Myelofibrosis (MF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm. Although Ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, remains the cornerstone of MF treatment, it does not reverse disease progression, and resistance frequently emerges. These limitations have prompted investigation into combination therapies targeting pathways beyond the JAK-STAT axis. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ruxolitinib-based combination therapies in patients with MF. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of databases for studies published through August 1, 2025. Thirteen distinct Ruxolitinib-based combination regimens were included. Primary efficacy endpoints were &#x2265;35% spleen volume reduction at 24&#x2009;weeks (SVR35) and &#x2265;50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS50). Safety endpoints focused on the incidence of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and anemia. Subgroup analyses were performed based on prior JAK inhibitor exposure and therapeutic mechanism of action. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies comprising 1,088 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Among JAK inhibitor-na&#xef;ve patients, the combination of Ruxolitinib with Selinexor demonstrated the highest efficacy (SVR35: 92%; TSS50: 78%), followed by Ruxolitinib plus BMS-986158 (SVR35: 90%). For patients with prior JAK inhibitor exposure, Ruxolitinib plus Siremadlin (SVR35: 45%) showed notable activity. CONCLUSION: For JAK inhibitor-na&#xef;ve patients, Ruxolitinib-based combination regimens demonstrated satisfactory clinical responses and the potential for meaningful disease control. For patients with prior JAK inhibitor exposure, the addition of combination therapy drugs may further enhance the efficacy. Personalized treatment selection remains essential, as therapeutic efficacy is significantly influenced by prior JAK inhibitor exposure.

Humans

Comparing the efficacy and safety of unilateral versus bilateral spinal anesthesia: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral spinal anesthesia has gained increasing attention in recent years. Emerging evidence suggests that it provides comparable analgesia to conventional bilateral spinal anesthesia while reducing adverse effects, and its efficacy and safety compared to bilateral spinal anesthesia remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of unilateral versus bilateral spinal anesthesia. DESIGN: Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 10, 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Included studies were randomized controlled trials involving adult patients (&#x2265;18&#x2009;years) undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia, comparing unilateral versus bilateral spinal anesthesia for efficacy and adverse effects. Studies that focused exclusively on either unilateral or bilateral spinal anesthesia were excluded. The comparator group used the same local anesthetic as the experimental group, with no restrictions on adjuncts (e.g. fentanyl, morphine). RESULTS: Nineteen randomized controlled trials including 1191 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with bilateral spinal anesthesia, unilateral spinal anesthesia has a longer onset of sensory blockade (MD = 2.58, 95% CI: 0.93 to 4.22, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.002), a shorter duration of sensory blockade (MD&#x2009;=&#x2009;-27.83, 95% CI: -39.25 to -16.42, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.00001). In addition, unilateral spinal anesthesia significantly reduced the incidence of hypotension (RR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.52, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.0001), nausea and vomiting (RR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.56, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.002), and post-dural puncture headache (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.81, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.009). No statistically significant differences were observed in bradycardia and urinary retention. Collectively, these findings support unilateral spinal anesthesia as a strategy that may enhance perioperative safety while maintaining adequate anesthetic efficacy in appropriately selected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral spinal anesthesia may offer a favorable balance between anesthetic efficacy and safety compared with bilateral spinal anesthesia, although its clinical utility may depend on surgical duration and patient characteristics.

Humans

Assessment of the safety and efficacy of sodium pentaborate pentahydrate in individuals with overweight and obesity: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 dose-finding trial.

The present study aimed to examine the short-term safety and tolerability of sodium pentaborate pentahydrate (NaB) and to explore preliminary efficacy and dose selection as secondary objectives in individuals with overweight or obesity. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 trial, conducted from July 2024 to January 2025, 177 adults with overweight or obesity were randomized, of whom 116 completed the 12-week trial. Participants received placebo or NaB at doses of 200, 400, 600, 800, or 1,000&#x2009;mg for 12&#x2009;weeks, alongside a standardized diet and exercise programme. The primary safety objective was to investigate short-term safety and tolerability through adverse events, hypoglycaemic episodes, gastrointestinal adverse events, and changes in haematological and biochemical parameters. The primary exploratory efficacy outcome was percentage change in body weight from baseline to week 12. Secondary and exploratory efficacy outcomes included body weight, body mass index (BMI), waist and hip circumferences, waist-to-hip ratio, glycaemic markers, lipid parameters, and blood pressure. Baseline characteristics were broadly similar across groups (all p&#x2009;&#x2265;&#x2009;0.05), and no major short-term safety signal was observed. Mean body weight decreased in the 400&#x2009;mg (-2.6&#x2009;kg), 600&#x2009;mg (-1.2&#x2009;kg), and 1,000&#x2009;mg groups (-3.1&#x2009;kg). Compared with placebo, the 1,000&#x2009;mg dose resulted in the largest reductions in body weight (mean difference, -2.30&#x2009;kg; p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.01) and BMI (mean difference, -0.85&#x2009;kg/m2; p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.02). The 1,000&#x2009;mg dose showed preliminary efficacy for reducing body weight and BMI over 12&#x2009;weeks compared with placebo, with no major short-term safety signal and no clinically meaningful changes in renal, hepatic, or haematological markers. All reported adverse events were mild. These short-term findings are exploratory and require confirmation in future phase 3 trials with extended follow-up to investigate long-term safety and efficacy.

Humans

Predictors of Efficacy Maintenance After Vunakizumab Discontinuation in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Efficacy cannot be maintained in some psoriasis patients after biological discontinuation. This study aimed to explore predictors of efficacy maintenance after vunakizumab discontinuation in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: This post hoc analysis used data from a phase III trial (NCT04839016); 291 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who achieved 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score at Week 52 were enrolled. Efficacy maintenance was defined as patients who maintained PASI 90 or PASI 100 after 20&#x2009;weeks of vunakizumab discontinuation. RESULTS: There were 44.7% and 72.5% of patients with PASI 100 and PASI 90 maintenance, respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression model, body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR]&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.922, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.024) and treatment interruption (OR&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.550, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.020) were independently associated with a lower possibility of PASI 100 maintenance; however, the association of family history of psoriasis and the first time of PASI 100 achievement with PASI 100 maintenance did not achieve statistical significance. Duration of psoriasis (OR&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.972, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.049) and treatment interruption (OR&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.257, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001) were independently associated with a lower possibility of PASI 90 maintenance. Two nomograms for predicting PASI 90 and PASI 100 maintenance were constructed based on the multivariate models, which disclosed good calibration performance. CONCLUSIONS: PASI 90 and PASI 100 maintenance rates are 72.5% and 44.7% after 20&#x2009;weeks of vunakizumab discontinuation in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. BMI, treatment interruption, and duration of psoriasis predict a lower possibility of efficacy maintenance after vunakizumab discontinuation.

Humans

In vitro and in vivo efficacy of vancomycin against Elizabethkingia species and the impact of increased vancomycin MICs.

UNLABELLED: This study aimed to evaluate the concordance of vancomycin susceptibility testing methods, its in vivo and in vitro efficacy, and the mechanisms underlying elevated MICs in Elizabethkingia spp. Vancomycin susceptibilities of 18 E. anophelis isolates were determined using multiple assays. The efficacy of vancomycin against five clinical isolates and one laboratory-induced mutant with an elevated vancomycin MIC was evaluated using time-kill assays and Galleria mellonella and murine models. Vancomycin MICs (16-32 mg/L) determined by broth microdilution were consistent with agar dilution, Etest, and MBC assay results. All isolates had zone diameters < 17 mm and were, thus, categorized as non-susceptible according to the CLSI criteria for Enterococcus spp. Time-kill assays of five clinical isolates demonstrated that vancomycin at a clinically relevant concentration (4 mg/L) exhibited poor bactericidal activity similar to that of teicoplanin. Vancomycin improved Galleria mellonella survival in a dose-dependent manner, whereas teicoplanin, dalbavancin, oritavancin, and daptomycin were ineffective. Murine models revealed that vancomycin at a human-equivalent dose (25 mg/kg twice daily) prolonged survival in most infections and modestly reduced bacterial load, while teicoplanin remained ineffective. Vancomycin efficacy was significantly reduced in G. mellonella and mice infected with a mutant strain exhibiting an elevated MIC (128 mg/L), which was attributable to spontaneous mutations in pbp4. In conclusion, E. anophelis were consistently non-susceptible to vancomycin as determined by multiple in vitro assays. However, vancomycin demonstrated unique in vivo activity among glycopeptides although this effect was abrogated by spontaneous mutations leading to elevated MICs. IMPORTANCE: Elizabethkingia anophelis is a multidrug-resistant pathogen associated with limited treatment options and high mortality. Most commonly considered agents, including fluoroquinolones, piperacillin/tazobactam, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, are increasingly compromised by resistance, toxicity, or inconsistent efficacy. Although vancomycin is not routinely used for Gram-negative infections due to limited outer membrane permeability, case reports have suggested potential benefit in Elizabethkingia infections under critical conditions. In this study, we show that E. anophelis isolates are uniformly non-susceptible to vancomycin in vitro and exhibit minimal bactericidal activity. However, vancomycin conferred a modest but statistically significant survival benefit in two independent animal models. Importantly, this effect was lost in strains with vancomycin-induced MIC elevation, and genome analysis identified pbp4 mutations as a potential underlying mechanism. These findings suggest vancomycin may offer therapeutic benefit when no preferred options are available. They support cautious use in selected cases and highlight the need for continued monitoring of susceptibility and resistance development.

Vancomycin

Efficacy and Safety of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for the Management of Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists for the management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA methodology through July 2025 that evaluated the efficacy and safety of GLP-1 agonists for the management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Efficacy endpoints were change in body weight (kg), change in body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2), and change in HbA1c (%). The safety endpoint was gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects. A P-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and heterogeneity was reported as I2. DATA SYNTHESIS: Six studies were included in this systematic review, of which 4 trials were included in the meta-analysis. The difference found between GLP-1 agonists and placebo was a change in weight of -5.85 kg (P = 0.0622, 95% CI = -9.72 to -1.97), a change in BMI of -2.11 kg/m2 (P = 0.7692, 95% CI = -5.51 to 1.29), and a change in HbA1c of -1.58 (P = 0.6659, 95% CI = -4.75 to 1.58). The overall risk ratio for a patient to experience a GI-related adverse effect when taking a GLP-1 agonist compared to placebo was 1.83 (95% CI = 1.42 to 2.37). RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: While the efficacy endpoints did not reach significance, this meta-analysis shows that select GLP-1 receptor agonists may be used to promote weight loss in patients taking antipsychotics. Controlling antipsychotic-induced weight gain helps patients remain adherent to therapeutic doses of their antipsychotic medications. CONCLUSION: The use of certain GLP-1 agonists may be considered to help promote weight loss in patients experiencing antipsychotic-induced weight gain.

Humans

[Exploring the mechanism underlying the efficacy differences of "Tiaojing Cuyun Acupuncture"for premature ovarian failure based on vaginal microbiota structure].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the efficacy of "Tiaojing Cuyun Acupuncture" combined with hormone replacement therapy in the treatment of premature ovarian failure (POF), and to investigate differences in vaginal microbiota among patients with different therapeutic responses, thereby preliminarily exploring the mechanism underlying efficacy differences. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients with POF were randomly divided into an observation group (49 cases, 1 case was eliminated)and a control group (49 cases, 1 case dropped out). The control group was treated with hormone replacement therapy with Femoston, one tablet each time, once daily. On the basis of the control group, the observation group was additionally treated with "Tiaojing Cuyun Acupuncture". Acupoint group 1 included Baihui (GV20), Zhongwan (CV12), Guanyuan (CV4), and bilateral Tianshu (ST25), Zigong (EX-CA1), Dahe (KI12), Zusanli (ST36), Sanyinjiao (SP6), and Taichong (LR3). Acupoint group 2 included Baihui (GV20), bilateral Shenshu (BL23), Ciliao (BL32), and Taixi (KI3). The two acupoint groups were used alternately, beginning with acupoint group 1. Treatment was administered once every other day, three times per week.Both groups were treated for three menstrual cycles. Serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH),estradiol (E2), and anti-M &#xfc; llerian hormone (AMH) levels on days 3-5 of the menstrual cycle were measured before and after treatment in the two groups. Self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) scores were assessed before and after treatment, and clinical efficacy was evaluated in the two groups. Five effective patients (G0 subgroup) and five ineffective patients (G1 subgroup)were randomly selected from each group, and their vaginal microbiota structure was analyzed using 16S rRNA sequencing. RESULTS: After treatment, FSH levels in both groups were lower than those before treatment (P<0.05); SAS scores in both groups were lower than those before treatment (P<0.05), and the observation group had lower SAS score than the control group (P<0.05). The total effective rate was 77.1% (37/48) in the observation group, which was higher than 56.3% (27/48) in the control group (P<0.05). Vaginal microbiota analysis showed that at the phylum level, the relative abundance of Firmicutes in the G0 subgroup of the control group was higher than that in the G1 subgroup, while the relative abundances of Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria were lowed in the G0 subgroup. In contrast, the observation group exhibited an opposite trend: the G0 subgroup had lower Firmicutes abundance but higher abundances of Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria compared with the G1 subgroup. At the family and genus levels, Bifidobacterium was enriched in the G0 subgroups of both groups, whereas Lactobacillus predominated in the G1 subgroups. The G0 subgroup of the control group showed higher abundance of Gardnerella, while both Lactobacillus and Gardnerella were concurrently elevated in the G1 subgroup of the observation group. Additionally, in the observation group indicated that Clostridiales and Rikenellaceae were significantly more abundant in the G0 subgroup than in the G1 subgroup (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The "Tiaojing Cuyun Acupuncture" combined with hormone replacement therapy is superior to hormone replacement therapy alone in improving anxiety. There are differences in vaginal microbiota structure among patients with different theraputic efficacy, suggesting that the vaginal microecological environment may be involved in the mechanism of treatment response in POF.

Humans

Comparative Efficacy of Non-opioid Analgesic Drugs for Chronic Cancer Pain: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: While opioids remain the primary pharmacological intervention for cancer pain management, their clinical utility is frequently compromised by dose-limiting toxicities. This study aimed to determine the comparative efficacy, opioid-sparing potential, and clinical hierarchy of non-opioid adjuvant drug classes. The study was structured around the PICO framework to evaluate the pharmacological strategies currently utilized in multimodal clinical oncology. METHODS: A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane) was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2000 and 2025. The primary outcome was global analgesic efficacy (standardized mean difference [SMD]), while secondary outcomes included the opioid-sparing effect, defined as the percentage reduction in morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) and the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (Harms). A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to rank treatments using SUCRA values. The methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0) tool. RESULTS: Twenty-three RCTs (n = 1845) met the inclusion criteria. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (-1.10) and anticonvulsants (-1.06) demonstrated the most robust analgesic effects. The SUCRA ranking confirmed a clear hierarchy, with the combination of anticonvulsants and antidepressants showing the highest probability of efficacy. A significant opioid-sparing effect was observed for gabapentinoids and ketamine, facilitating MEDD reduction. While serious adverse events were rare, minor harms (somnolence, dizziness) were more frequent in the most effective classes. CONCLUSION: Our NMA provides a robust evidence base for a "Clinical Tier" system, ranking adjuvants by their balance of efficacy and safety. These findings support the early integration of Tier I agents (anticonvulsants and NSAIDs) to optimize pain control and reduce opioid-related toxicities in chronic cancer pain management.

Humans

Efficacy of amivantamab, a bi-specific antibody targeting EGFR and MET, in ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines.

BACKGROUND: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are highly effective in treating ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, at least 40% of patients develop acquired resistance during treatment. Adaptive or acquired resistance to ALK TKIs could be mediated through epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) signaling. Sixteen percent of acquired resistance cases are linked to bypass signaling. METHODS: In this study, we evaluated the effects of amivantamab, a bi-specific antibody targeting both EGFR and MET, on ALK-rearranged NSCLC cells. We investigated the effect of amivantamab on the ALK-rearranged NSCLC cell lines H3122, ABC-19, and ABC-11. RESULTS: Combining alectinib with amivantamab resulted in greater inhibition of cell growth inhibition in H3122 and ABC-19 cells compared to alectinib alone, but not in ABC-11 cells. EGFR TKI erlotinib showed similar efficacy in H3122 and ABC-19 cells, whereas MET TKI tepotinib was ineffective in both, suggesting that the efficacy of amivantamab is through EGFR inhibition. Unlike H3122 and ABC-19 cells, ABC-11 cells were resistant to EGFR/MET signaling inhibition. Interestingly, amivantamab enhanced alectinib efficacy against ABC-11 cells in the presence of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), despite showing no effect alone without PBMCs, suggesting action through non-signal inhibitory mechanisms. Finally, we treated alectinib-resistant cellswith alectinib, with or without amivantamab, and found that amivantamab restored the sensitivity of these cells to alectinib. CONCLUSION: The bi-specific antibody amivantamab, which targets EGFR and MET, enhanced the efficacy of alectinib through both signal and non-signal inhibitory mechanisms in ALK-rearranged NSCLC cells.

Humans

Efficacy of afoxolaner (NexGard&#xae;) for the treatment of myiasis caused by the zoonotic tumbu fly, Cordylobia anthropophaga, in domestic dogs under field conditions.

Cordylobia anthropophaga is a major cause of furuncular myiasis in dogs and humans in sub-Saharan Africa, yet evidence for pharmacological control remains limited. Current management relies mainly on mechanical larval removal, and no controlled studies have assessed the efficacy of modern antiparasitic agents. This study evaluated the curative and preventive efficacy of a single dose of afoxolaner (NexGard&#xae;) in dogs with naturally acquired C. anthropophaga infestation under field conditions and explored a possible indirect protective effect in puppies after maternal treatment. A randomized, blinded, negative-controlled field study was conducted in Samburu County, Kenya, and included 104 naturally infested dogs allocated to a treated group (n&#x202f;=&#x202f;53) or an untreated control group (n&#x202f;=&#x202f;51). Clinical evaluations were performed on Days 0, 15 (&#xb1;2), 30 (&#xb1;2), and 45 (&#xb1;2). Efficacy was assessed based on the presence of active nodules and clinical scores. Additional observational data were collected from puppies born to or nursing from treated bitches. Compared to the control group, parasiticide efficacy was 94% on Day 15 and 100% on Day 30. The number of parasite-free dogs reached 86.3% on Day 15, 100% on Day 30, and 95.3% on Day 45. Treated dogs showed a significant clinical improvement from the first post-treatment assessment, whereas infestation persisted in controls (nodules: OR = 0.003, 95% CI 0.001-0.017; skin lesions: OR = 0.010, 95% CI 0.002-0.051; lymph node: OR = 0.013, 95% CI 0.002-0.074; body condition: OR = 0.073, 95% CI 0.027-0.195; all p&#x202f;<&#x202f;.001), with large effect sizes at the final visit for all outcomes (r&#x202f;=&#x202f;0.521-0.793). No C. anthropophaga infestations were detected in examined puppies from treated dams, including puppies exposed during pregnancy or lactation, up to 4 weeks after birth and up to 11 weeks of age, respectively. Afoxolaner appears effective to control canine cordylobiosis and may offer indirect protection to puppies, warranting further investigation.

Animals