Sudden death in the emergency department: a comprehensive approach for families, emergency medical technicians, and emergency department staff.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Formal data are lacking regarding emergency departments in academic medical centers, particularly those without an emergency medicine residency program. The Education Committee of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine conducted a survey to define a national profile of academic emergency medicine. DESIGN: Prospective survey with telephone follow-up. SETTING: Academic medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty-three academic medical centers as defined by the Association of American Medical Colleges. RESULTS: Results were obtained from 94 (78%) institutions: 27 (29%) had an emergency medicine residency program and 67 (71%) had no emergency medicine residency program. Significant differences were found between those with and without emergency medicine residency programs regarding 24-hour attending coverage (96% versus 73%), mean weekly clinical faculty hours (26 versus 33), the number of emergency medicine board-certified faculty, faculty recruitment difficulties (25% versus 75%), and the presence of a curriculum for housestaff (96% versus 38%). No significant differences were noted regarding the presence of a curriculum for medical students (78% versus 64%). Of the 67 institutions with no emergency medicine residency programs, 42% were actively planning a program, and 42% would consider future development of a program. CONCLUSION: This article provides the first comprehensive profile of emergency medicine in the Association of American Medical Colleges academic medical centers. Programs with emergency medicine residency programs provided more 24-hour attending coverage, had more emergency medicine board-certified faculty, and reported less difficulty recruiting additional faculty than institutions with no emergency medicine residency program. Both need to expand their undergraduate educational activities. Many institutions with no emergency medicine residency program are attempting to develop emergency medicine residency programs.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The Health Care Financing Administration has contracted with regional peer review organizations to review Medicare admissions and to deny payment for hospital admissions that fail to meet peer review organization criteria. The purpose of this study was to compare emergency department admissions with non-emergency-department admissions with respect to rates of peer review organization denial and the reasons for those denials. All hospital Medicare admissions between January 1984 and April 1987 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were excluded if they received peer review organization pre-authorization prior to admission. The rest were classified by 1) source of admission (emergency department or non-emergency department), 2) peer review organization decision, 3) reason for peer review organization denial, 4) whether the denial was appealed, 5) the results of appeal. Chi-square or Fisher's Exact Test analysis was performed, and P less than 0.05 was considered to be significant. During the 40-month study period, there were 19,847 emergency department Medicare admissions and 19,752 non-emergency-department Medicare admissions. Of the non-emergency-department admissions, 7887 received pre-authorization. None of the emergency department admissions received pre-authorization. Of the 19,847 emergency department admissions, 433 (2.23%) were denied. Of these denials, 269 (60.7%) were appealed by the hospital; 136 (50.5%) successfully. Of the 11,865 non-emergency department, non-pre-authorized admissions, 333 (2.81%) were denied. Of these denials, 174 (52.2%) were appealed, 76 (43.6%) successfully. Overall, emergency department admissions were significantly less likely to receive peer review organization denial than non-emergency-department, non-pre-authorized admissions (P less than 0.003).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the current status of clinical, educational, social, ethical, and resource issues related to the care of the elderly among practitioners of emergency medicine. DESIGN: A mailed survey instrument. SETTING: None. TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS: Practicing emergency physicians randomly drawn from the membership list of the American College of Emergency Physicians. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 971 surveys were mailed, with 433 usable surveys among the 485 (50%) respondents. The surveyed emergency physicians anticipated a major impact on emergency department patient flow and bed availability in the hospital and ICU as the population ages. For each of seven clinical presentations (abdominal pain, altered mental status, chest pain, dizziness/vertigo, fever without a source, headache, multisystem trauma), 45% or more of the emergency physicians have more difficulty in the management of older compared with younger patients. Most respondents reported that each of these presentations required more time and resources for older patients. The majority believed research, the availability of continuing medical education, and time spent during residency training regarding geriatric emergency medicine was inadequate. CONCLUSION: Practicing emergency physicians are uncomfortable with elderly patients, and this may reflect the inadequacies of training, research, and continuing education in geriatric emergency medicine.
Cardiac arrest treatment continues to evolve. Adequate treatment of the individual patient requires that the whole ECC system function smoothly, consistently, and rapidly. To maximize communitywide survival rates, a careful evaluation of the entire chain of survival is required using standard measurements of performance. The challenge for the next decade is to establish this infrastructure and to conduct multicenter, prospective, controlled clinical trials to better define the key factors that will improve survival of cardiac arrest in every community.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The first link in the "chain of survival" concept is the activation of the emergency medical system (EMS) by a bystander after recognition of cardiac arrest (CA) or its immediate prodrome. Our ongoing study is aimed at evaluating the current effectiveness of bystander EMS activation for all cases of CA in the city and area of Mainz. Methods. Starting February 1991, we began to prospectively examine collapse-intervention intervals in all cases of CA treated by our physician-manned ambulance. Precision voice recorders carried by the ambulance crews are activated and linked to the EMS dispatcher to time the arrival of the ambulance vehicle. Time intervals starting from the time of collapse are then reconstructed from the dispatcher's time and the tapes. The emergency phone number dialled initially by the bystander and the time of collapse in witnessed cardiac arrests are identified. RESULTS. Sixty-six CAs were witnessed and included in this study. In 20% of those cases, the number dialled initially by the bystander was 19222 (EMS dispatcher), in 38% 110 (police), and in 42% other numbers (family practitioners or their on-call service, fire department). The time interval, as median (25th percentile; 75th percentile), between collapse and receipt call by the emergency dispatchers was 4 min (2; 8) for all patients (n = 66), and 6.5 min (3; 12) whenever numbers other than emergency phone numbers were dialled. All following time intervals (start of BLS or ACLS procedures) showed differences (P less than 0.05) between the 110 or 19222 group [BLS: 8.5 min (4.8; 13.1) or 10 min (7.35; 12.1); ACLS: 11.3 min (9.1; 13.45) or 12.9 min (10.6; 21.5)] vs the group, in which other phone numbers were initially dialled [BLS: 15.25 min (9.25; 19.4); ACLS: 20.11 min (12.6; 28.3)]. The first ECG rhythm showed VF in 56% and 54% in case 110 and 19222 were dialled, but only in 32% in the other group. CONCLUSION. Even one single weak link in the "chain of survival" can lower overall survival rates. An indispensable, but apparently underrated component of an effective EMS includes an informed citizenry able to call swiftly for help. Lack of an unequivocal emergency number, well known and accepted by the citizens, produces confusion and delays. In our systems, the correct medical emergency phone number (19222) was dialled in 20% of the cases only, thus demonstrating clearly the lack of public awareness of this 5-digit number. In a higher percentage, the three-digit police number (110) was dialled. In cases where numbers other than emergency numbers were dialled (42%), the longest time intervals between collapse and receipt of call by the dispatchers occurred, associated with the longest time intervals until initiation of CPR and the lowest percentage of patients found in ventricular fibrillation. We conclude that establishment of a simple three-digit EMS phone number, preferentially Europe-wide, in combination with an intensification of public awareness, could be a vital step not only to reduce time intervals between collapse and CPR in our EMS system but also to improve survival.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of an emergency medicine residency training program on the cost of care in the emergency department. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was conducted of all ED encounters for a three-month period, six months before and six months after the introduction of an emergency medicine residency program into an urban community hospital. Physician staffing of this ED before the residency period was by nonemergency medicine residency-trained emergency physicians. SETTING: A 27,000-visit-per-year urban community hospital ED. TYPE OF PATIENTS: A consecutive sample of all patients discharged home from the emergency center with one of six diagnoses. The diagnoses studied were viral upper respiratory infection, pharyngitis, acute asthma, seizure, lumbosacral strain, and cervical strain. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of laboratory test and radiograph ordering pertinent to the evaluation of each diagnostic category were used as a marker of cost of care. RESULTS: The presence of the residency training program did not increase the cost of care as measured by test use and, for three of the six diagnoses, actually lowered the cost of care. This effect was most prominent in the evaluation of lumbosacral and cervical strain when the residency physicians ordered radiographs at a rate five and 2.3 times lower, respectively, than the previous group and in the approach to pharyngitis when they ordered throat cultures 2.8 times less frequently. CONCLUSION: As measured by selected test use for six common discharge diagnoses, the introduction of an emergency medicine residency program did not increase the cost of care in this urban community hospital ED.
During the last three years, a nine-month training program at the University of Virginia was designed and implemented to prepare the nurse to assume an expanded role in the emergency department. The course provides the student with sufficient knowledge and skill to diagnose and treat patients in the emergency department setting while under the supervision of a physician. Graduates of the program are certified by the State of Virginia as "emergency nurse practitioners". Qualified candidates who had identified a physician preceptor or were from an area with embryonic emergency medical systems were given priority in the selection process. The training program was divided into three-month modules which dealt first with teaching interview techniques and physical assessment skills, then clinical experiences in rural and urban emergency departments, and finally a preceptorship in the community hospital where the nurses work with the physician preceptors.
Since compromises must be accepted in emergency Caesarean sections in respect of preparation, anaesthesia and hygienic standards, 143 emergency caesarean sections out of a total number of 37,583 deliveries were analysed during 1981-1990 from four different obstetrical departments as well as risks, complications, maternal and foetal morbidity and mortality were studied. In connection with these operations, which are not influenced only by medical factors but also by logistics, two mothers died (1.4%). Perinatal mortality was 3.3% (unpurified perinatal mortality: 8.5%). Neither the influence of time, when the Caesarean section was performed, nor the place of operation (theatre or labor bed), nor the indication for the operation on foetal outcome and maternal morbidity were found. Maternal morbidity was mainly contributed to pre- and intraoperative bleeding. Intraoperatively 12.6% and postoperatively 10.5% of the patients had to be given heterologous blood conserves. In more than a third of the newborn, which had been delivered by emergency Caesarean section, because of a pathological cardiotocogram, the pH values showed no pathological findings. The benefit of an antibiotic prophylaxis in emergency Caesarean sections could be significantly demonstrated, showing the different rates of secondary healing complications. A particular problem exists in emergency Caesarean sections for the delivery of the second twin following spontaneous delivery of the first one (2.8%).
This study compared the quality of the history, physical examination, and treatment of patients with hand injuries performed by emergency physicians with varied training backgrounds. Four hundred ninety-seven patients with isolated hand injuries were evaluated by 97 physicians, who were classified into four groups: (1) emergency medicine board certified, (2) primary care specialty board certified, (3) non-board certified, and (4) moonlighting residents. The history and physical examination were separated into several variables to define deficiencies. Adequacy of treatment were determined by two emergency physicians and an orthopedic surgeon. Significant differences were found in five categories. Group no. 4 documented the history and followed the Centers for Disease Control tetanus prophylaxis guidelines better than did groups no. 1 or 2. Group no. 1 obtained x-rays less often than any other group and had a better treatment score, but the latter did not reach statistical significance. Physicians of lesser training are more meticulous about documenting a history and following treatment protocols than are residency-trained or boarded emergency physicians, but order more tests and are less likely to document adequate treatment.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of the introduction of an emergency medicine residency program on the quality of care in an urban community hospital emergency department. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of all ED encounters for a three-month period beginning six months before and six months after the introduction of an emergency medicine residency. SETTING: A 27,000-visit-per-year urban community hospital ED. TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS: All patients who presented to the ED with one of five complaints and subsequently were discharged home. The five presenting categories examined were nontraumatic chest pain when age 30 years or more, lower abdominal pain in women aged 15 to 40 years, recent head trauma, headache of nontraumatic origin, and extremity laceration. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The frequency of physician documentation on the ED record of explicit criteria related to the five presenting complaints was used as a measure of the quality of care. Items sought for documentation included elements of the history and physical examination and diagnostic evaluations. The explicit criteria lists were drawn from the literature, including clinical policy guidelines. For each of the presenting complaints evaluated, documentation of the majority of items reflecting the quality of care was higher during the residency period. In no instance did the level of documentation decrease. CONCLUSION: As measured by a process evaluation, documentation of the medical record, the introduction of an emergency medicine residency significantly improved the quality of care in this urban community hospital ED.
An alternative follow-up system, a Continuing Emergency Care clinic (CEC) was developed at The Medical College of Pennsylvania in an attempt to increase emergency department patient compliance for follow-up. One year after the CEC was in operation, in an attempt to determine variables influencing the effectiveness of the clinic, a total of 375 emergency department patients given follow-up appointments to the CEC were studied. Results showed that a change in the structure of the clinic appointment and a shift in the line of responsibility for follow-up care directly to the emergency physician are two major variables positively affecting patient compliance.
This paper deals with the assessment after 2 years of the outcome of 89 psychiatric emergencies taking in charge in Saint-Luc hospital's (Brussels) emergency room, by 3 community mental health services. After the triangulation of the demand, in the emergency room, 91% of the patients go to the community mental health service. In 92.5% of cases, the crisis intervention is carried out by the same therapists they met in the emergency room with the collaboration of other members of the outpatient team. Crisis interventions are brief (less than 3 months) in 50% of cases, less than 1 years in 11.5% of cases and lead in 35% of cases to long-term in charge (more than 2 years: psychiatric and social follow-up).
Despite the emphasis on appropriateness of emergency department utilization, there is currently no methodology for assessing appropriateness nor measures for a community to evaluate and improve effectiveness of its E.M.S. system in treating emergencies at the appropriate emergency room and nonemergencies at appropriate alternative settings. The writer feels that the one current strategy which is widely accepted, the A.M.A.'s concept of categorization, has substantial methodologic limitations. The present paper suggests a methodology and a set of measures to assess appropriateness of utilization and illustrates them with data from Buffalo, New York, on a chart review of 24,594 emergency department patient medical records and interviews with 888 patients and their attending physicians. The measures include: 1) distribution of ambulance and critically ill patients by A.M.A. category of hospital, 2) utilization, characterized as system under- or over-response or as appropriate utilization, and 3) physician judgments as to indicated alternative treatment sites, which are suggested as evaluative tools to hospital and communities for E.M.S. assessment, and to federal and state agencies as performance standards, for project selection for funding and monitoring for outcome evaluation.