SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “fish allergy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2002

Recombinant fish parvalbumins: Candidates for diagnosis and treatment of fish allergy.

Fish and fish products represent one of the most important causes of IgE-mediated food hypersensitivity. In sensitized individuals contact with and consumption of fish can lead to severe health problems, ranging from urticaria and dermatitis to angiedema, diarrhoea, asthma and, at worst, systemic anaphylactic reactions and death. Parvalbumin, a small calcium-binding protein present in the muscles of vertebrates, was identified as the major fish allergen. We describe the isolation and characterization of cDNA clones coding for carp parvalbumin by IgE immunoscreening of a carp muscle expression library. These clones will be the basis for the production of recombinant carp parvalbumin, a useful tool for in vitro and in vivo diagnosis of fish allergy.

Allergens↗

PubMed2000

IgE antibody to fish gelatin (type I collagen) in patients with fish allergy.

BACKGROUND: Most children with anaphylaxis to measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines had shown sensitivity to bovine gelatin that was included in the vaccines. Recently, it was found that bovine type I collagen, which is the main content in the gelatin, is a major allergen in bovine gelatin allergy. Fish meat and skin also contain type I collagen. OBJECTIVE: The present study was designed to investigate IgE antibody to fish gelatin in children with fish allergy. METHODS: Serum samples were taken from patients in 3 groups: (1) 10 patients with fish allergy and specific IgE to fish meat; (2) two patients with allergies to both fish meat and bovine gelatin and specific IgE to fish meat and bovine gelatin; and (3) 15 patients with atopic dermatitis and specific IgE to fish meat. Various fish gelatins (type I collagen) were prepared from fish skin. IgE antibody to fish gelatin was analyzed by using ELISA and immunoblotting. RESULTS: Of 10 patients with fish allergy, 3 had specific IgE to fish gelatin. Of two patients with fish allergy and bovine gelatin allergy, all had specific IgE to fish gelatin. Of 15 patients with atopic dermatitis and specific IgE to fish meat, 5 had specific IgE to fish gelatin. Furthermore, IgE from pooled serum of the patients reacted with both the alpha1 and alpha2 chains of fish type I collagen in immunoblots. There is cross-reactivity among gelatins from various fishes, but there is little cross-reactivity between fish and bovine gelatins. CONCLUSION: Some fish-sensitive patients possessed IgE antibody to fish gelatin. Fish gelatin (type I collagen) might be an allergen in subjects with fish allergy.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Antacid medication inhibits digestion of dietary proteins and causes food allergy: a fish allergy model in BALB/c mice.

BACKGROUND: Digestible proteins were supposed to be irrelevant for oral sensitization and induction of food allergy. Approximately 10% of the adult population uses antacids for the treatment of dyspeptic disorders, drugs that hinder peptic digestion. In these patients, proteins that are normally degradable might act as food allergens. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to study the influence of antacid intake on the allergenicity of dietary proteins, taking sturgeon caviar and parvalbumin, the major fish allergen, as examples. METHODS: Caviar proteins and recombinant parvalbumin from carp, rCyp c 1, were applied for intragastric feedings with or without the antacids sucralfate, ranitidine or omeprazole, using a Balb/c mouse model. RESULTS: Both caviar proteins and parvalbumin were rapidly degraded in an in vitro digestion assay at pH 2.0, but not at pH 5.0, imitating the effect of antacids. The groups fed with caviar in combination with ranitidine hydrochloride intramuscularly or sucralfate orally had significant levels of caviar-specific IgE antibodies (P <.01), T-cell reactivity, and elevated counts of gastrointestinal eosinophils and mast cells. Food allergy in these groups was further evidenced by oral provocation tests and positive immediate-type skin reactivity. In contrast, feedings with caviar alone led to antigen-specific T-cell tolerance. None of the groups showed immune reactivity against the daily mouse diet. As a proof of the principle, feeding mice with parvalbumin in combination with ranitidine or omeprazole intramuscularly induced allergen-specific IgE antibodies (P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: When antacid medication impairs the gastric digestion, IgE synthesis toward novel dietary proteins is promoted, leading to food allergy.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1996

Immunopathogenesis of fish allergy: identification of fish-allergic adults by skin test and radioallergosorbent test.

BACKGROUND: As the consumption of fish increases in the United States, the importance of allergic reactions to fish has become clear. Since most previous studies on fish allergy have focused on children reacting mainly to codfish, there is a need to investigate allergic reactions to other fish in adults. OBJECTIVE: To identify fish-allergic adults, and to assess cross-reactivity among different species of fish by RAST inhibition. METHODS: Thirty-nine individuals who reported fish allergy were selected for study; 32 (82%) were atopic as defined by two or more positive skin tests to common inhalant allergens and a history of allergic reactions and 33 (85%) experienced allergic symptoms within 30 minutes after ingesting fish. The most frequently reported symptoms were hives (69%), itching (69%), and wheezing/chest tightness (54%). Study subjects were skin tested with fish extracts and their sera assayed for IgE antibodies to different fish species. RESULTS: Thirty-six (92%) of the subjects tested had a positive skin test to at least one of 17 fish extracts tested; 9/35 (26%) reacted to all 17 extracts. Of the atopic (two or more positive skin tests to common inhalant allergens plus a personal and/or family history of allergy) and nonatopic fish-tolerant controls, 20/26 (77%) reacted by skin test to one or more fish extracts tested; the most prevalent positive reaction was to anchovy (73%). A significant correlation (P < .01) was observed between skin test reactivity of fish-allergic subjects to most fish extracts and fish RAST reactions. Radioallergosorbent inhibition testing demonstrated significant cross-reactivity among pollack, salmon, trout, and tuna; and between mackerel and anchovy. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that fish-allergic subjects may be clinically sensitive to more than one species of fish. Skin test reactivity to fish by itself is not an adequate criterion for the confirmation of clinically relevant fish allergy; consequently, fish-allergic subjects with positive skin tests to several fish species should exercise caution when eating fish until tolerance can be demonstrated by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge, at the patient's earliest convenience.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

A metagenomic analysis of the gut microbiota in a mouse model of fish allergy.

BACKGROUND: Fish are among the most frequent causes of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated food allergies (Type I). Currently, there is no known cure for fish allergy and individuals who are sensitized have to practice strict, lifelong avoidance of fish products in their diets. The relationship between gut microbiome and food allergies is currently a major topic of discussion; these pathologies involve the development of dysbiosis, which is a microbial imbalance resulting from immune-related mechanisms. Recent studies have provided evidence that individuals suffering from food allergies, display an intestinal microbiota with a different microbial composition compared to healthy subjects. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: In this work, we have described for the first time the differences in microbiome composition in a mouse model of fish allergy with previous sensitization to the main allergen, beta-Parvalbumin (β-PRVB), compared to mouse individuals without allergic response. RESULTS: The metagenomic analysis has shown differences in taxonomic composition between the treatments. Regarding phyla, an increase in the relative abundance of Patescibacteria, specifically Saccharimonas genus and Candidatus_Saccharimonas group, were observed in the allergic animals (Prvb_Alum group) when compared to the other groups. In contrast, the relative abundance of the RF39 group (Bacilli), Atopobiaceae family, Erysipelotrichaceae, and the Coriobacteriaceae_UCG-002 group, was higher in the animals that did not develop an allergic response, despite being exposed to the allergen (Prvb group). Furthermore, an increase in the relative abundance of Lachnospiraceae ASF356 group was observed in the control group compared to the other treatments. This family, has been reported to be inversely associated with the progression of intestinal inflammation and anaphylactic diseases. For the first time, the gut microbiota composition of individual mice with and without fish allergies is described in detail in this work. This study may shed light on the potential contribution of gut microbiota to the onset and avoidance of food allergies.

beta-parvalbumin↗

PubMed2003

Severe reactions from roe without concomitant fish allergy.

BACKGROUND: Although fish allergy is common, no studies have been published on allergy to fish roe. OBJECTIVE: To describe 2 cases of IgE-mediated allergy to 2 roe species. METHODS: Two patients, one with local symptoms and the other with anaphylaxis following ingestion of roe, underwent skin prick testing (SPT) with 2 roe species, whitefish roe (WFR) and rainbow trout roe (RTR). Serum samples were taken for IgE measurement and immunoblotting to identify roe allergens. Inhibition studies were performed to scrutinize the cross-reactivity between the roes and to fish. RESULTS: The results of the SPTs with the roes were clearly positive in both patients but negative in control persons. The results of SPTs to all other foods were negative. Roe-specific IgE levels were elevated in the serum samples of both patients. Immunoblotting revealed different IgE-binding patterns of the extracts and different inhibition profiles with the serum samples. In WFR blotting, both serum samples detected a heavy IgE-binding band at approximately 20 kDa, which was not inhibited with fish. Cross-reactivity between the roes was demonstrated in the patient with local symptoms from RTR but not in the patient with anaphylaxis from WFR. The first serum sample also detected several IgE-binding bands in the RTR blot, the most intensive at 21 to 23 kDa and 30 kDa, which were partially inhibited by WFR and more completely with fish. The anaphylaxis patient did not detect allergens in the RTR blot. After the investigation, the patients have remained symptom free and able to consume all kinds of fish without problems. CONCLUSIONS: IgE-mediated allergy to roe is possible without concomitant fish allergy. Roe allergy should be explored in patients who test negative to fish but are suspected of having seafood-related allergy.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Resolution of fish allergy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Fish allergy is one of the most common food allergies, and it is believed to be lifelong. There are no published reports, to my knowledge, of resolution of fish allergy. OBJECTIVE: To report a case of resolution of IgE-mediated fish allergy. METHODS: The patient was a 68-year-old man with a history of fish-induced anaphylaxis who had previously undergone prick-puncture skin testing to several fish species. Additional skin testing was performed in October 2002. Subsequently, he underwent an open challenge with halibut. RESULTS: The patient's previous skin tests showed him to have strongly positive reactions to several fish species. However, testing performed in October 2002 produced negative results to a number of fish species. In addition, he tolerated an open challenge with halibut. In the ensuing 8 months, he has regularly ingested salmon, cod, and halibut without experiencing any allergic reactions. CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrates that fish allergy is not invariably lifelong. Hence, allergists should consider reevaluating the allergy status of adults with a history of fish hypersensitivity.

Aged↗

PubMed1993

Fish allergy in children.

Fish allergy is a relevant clinical problem in fish eating and/or processing communities but, because of the technologic advances of the preserved food industry, it may now be said to be a worldwide problem. Among 558 consecutive children referred for atopic diseases, 25 (4.48%) subjects skin test- and RAST- positive to cod were recorded and we extrapolated that about 4-5/1000 children have allergy to cod in our areas. As a group, children with cod allergy seem to manifest a higher atopic condition and more severe clinical manifestations. IgE level z-score (mean +/- SD) was significantly (P < .001) higher in 68 cod-positive children (14.27 +/- 3.87) than in 533 children positive to other inhalant and/or food allergens (8.12 +/- 4.06). In spite of a smaller median age (59 months), cod-positive children had a higher frequency of asthma (41/68 = 60.2%) than children with other allergies, and age at the onset of asthma was significantly (P < .001) younger in the former (32 months) than in the latter (41 months) subjects. In addition, urticaria-angioedema was more frequently recorded in cod-allergic children (23/68 = 33.8%) than in patients with allergy to inhalants (26/410 = 6.3%; P < .01), inhalants and foods different from cod (11/74 = 14.8%; P < .01), or foods different from cod (6/49 = 12.2%; P < .01). The male:female ratio in cod-allergic children (3.53) was significantly higher than that observed in children with allergy to inhalants (1.78; P = .037) or foods (0.68; P < .0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Gelatin prepared from tuna skin: a risk factor for fish allergy or sensitization?

BACKGROUND: Although fish gelatin may represent a useful alternative to bovine or porcine gelatin, the clearly recognized high prevalence of fish allergy could increase the risk of anaphylaxis to gelatin. The rationale for investigating tuna gelatin rather than gelatin from more allergenic fishes is the availability of an industrial gelatin under development. The infrequent occurrence of tuna allergy should influence the safety of a derived product. The present study investigated IgE antibodies to tuna-skin-derived gelatin in adults and children with documented fish allergy or sensitization. METHODS: Serum samples were taken from 100 consecutive patients with fish allergy or sensitization and tested for IgE antibodies against hydrolyzed or nonhydrolyzed gelatin extracted from tuna skin as compared to extracts from tuna flesh, tuna skin as well as bovine or porcine gelatin. Patients with tuna allergies or sensitization were sensitive to the same tuna species (yellowfin) as that from which the gelatin was obtained. IgE antibodies to these various extracts were analyzed using SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. RESULTS: Only 3 of the 100 serum samples tested gave evidence of reactivity to gelatin extracted from tuna skin. Cross-reactivity between bovine/porcine and fish gelatin was not observed. CONCLUSION: The risk of adverse reactions to tuna skin gelatin seems to be significantly lower than the risk of fish allergy. Fish gelatin may represent a valuable alternative to bovine or porcine gelatin.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Fish allergy in atopic children.

The prevalence of fish allergy among 11 atopic children with elevated levels of specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E for cod was determined. None of the children had a history of fish allergy. All of the children had asthma and allergic rhinitis and 5 of them had also atopic dermatitis. The children underwent allergy skin tests (codfish, tuna, catfish, salmon, flounder, and bass), specific IgE tests (salmon, trout, tuna, eel, and mackerel), and food challenge tests. Skin tests in cod-specific IgE-positive children were positive for codfish in 4 children, tuna in 2, catfish in 2, salmon in 6, flounder in one, and bass in 2. Three children had elevated specific IgE for salmon, 5 for trout, 8 for tuna, 4 for eel, and 4 for mackerel. Oral fish challenge with 10 g of fish did not result in positive reaction in any of the children. In conclusion, a positive food challenge test provided the only definitive confirmation of fish allergy, whereas positive allergy skin tests or positive specific IgE tests were less reliable. Skin tests and in vitro specific IgE assays were not correlated with clinical symptoms of fish allergy, and the results of these 2 tests did not correlate with each other in this study.

Anaphylaxis↗

PubMed1997

Life-threatening fish allergy successfully treated with immunotherapy.

Manifestations of fish allergy can include near-fatal anaphylactic reaction. In very sensitive patients, fish odors and cooking vapors may have some allergenic activity. We reported a case of life-threatening fish allergy in a girl of 39 months referred for three episodes of Quincke edema with wheezing, cyanosis and severe urticaria after fish consumption or inhalation. Reagins were found against codfish and direct skin prick test with fresh food (codfish) showed important local reaction. Strict avoidance of fish in the diet is usually the only recommended procedure. However, in this particular case, the life-threatening nature of the allergic reaction was the major consideration to perform a desensitization. The child was treated by RUSH immunotherapy using codfish extracts from BENCARD company, following the schedule for insect venom allergy described by Pharmacia. Immunotherapy was performed immediately after determination of the threshold of sensitivity by specific skin prick tests and intra-dermal injections. Desensitization was initiated with a 1/10 dilution of the cut-off solution and 5 subcutaneous injections were administered daily. When important local reactions were observed, additional doses were necessary to obtain tolerance. After the RUSH therapy, the child was submitted to uncooked codfish odors without any reaction. No reaction has been observed even when the child has accidentally eaten a little piece of codfish.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Fish allergy: is cross-reactivity among fish species relevant? Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge studies of fish allergic adults.

BACKGROUND: Allergic reactions to fish are a common cause of food allergy in many areas of the world where fish is a major source of protein. Although different species of fish may be consumed, possible cross-reactivity has received limited investigation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess potential cross-reactivity to different species of fish species using double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC) in fish-allergic adults and to compare skin test and RAST reactivity with the challenge response. METHODS: Nine skin prick test and/or RAST-positive adult individuals with histories of an immediate-type reaction following fish ingestion were challenged with different fish species using double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge. RESULTS: Of a total of 19 double-blind, placebo-controlled fish challenges performed, 14 challenges (74%) resulted in the induction of objective signs that were consistent with an IgE-mediated response. The most common sign observed was emesis (37%); the most prevalent subjective symptoms reported were compatible with the oral allergy syndrome (84%). Three subjects reacted to at least three fish species and one subject reacted to two fish species tested. In regard to the positive challenges, predictive accuracy of skin prick test and RAST was 84% and 78%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that clinically relevant cross-reactivity among various species of fish may exist. Advising fish-allergic subjects to avoid all fish species should be emphasized until a species can be proven safe to eat by provocative challenge.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Recombinant carp parvalbumin, the major cross-reactive fish allergen: a tool for diagnosis and therapy of fish allergy.

IgE-mediated reactions to fish allergens represent one of the most frequent causes of food allergy. We have constructed an expression cDNA library from carp (Cyprinus carpio) muscle in phage lambda gt11 and used serum IgE from a fish allergic patient to isolate 33 cDNA clones that coded for two parvalbumin isoforms (Cyp c 1.01 and Cyp c 1.02) with comparable IgE binding capacities. Both isoforms represented calcium-binding proteins that belonged to the beta-lineage of parvalbumins. The Cyp c 1.01 cDNA was overexpressed in Escherichia coli, and rCyp c 1.01 was purified to homogeneity. Circular dichroism analysis and mass spectroscopy showed that rCyp c 1.01 represented a folded protein with mainly alpha-helical secondary structure and a molecular mass of 11,416 Da, respectively. rCyp c 1.01 reacted with IgE from all fish-allergic patients tested (n = 60), induced specific and dose-dependent basophil histamine release, and contained most of the IgE epitopes (70%) present in natural allergen extracts from cod, tuna, and salmon. Therefore, it may be used to identify patients suffering from IgE-mediated fish allergy. The therapeutic potential of rCyp c 1.01 is indicated by our findings that rabbit Abs raised against rCyp c 1.01 inhibited the binding of IgE (n = 25) in fish-allergic patients to rCyp c 1.01 between 35 and 97% (84% mean inhibition) and that depletion of calcium strongly reduced IgE recognition of rCyp c 1.01. The latter results suggest that it will be possible to develop strategies for immunotherapy for fish allergy that are based on calcium-free hypoallergenic rCyp c 1.01 derivatives.

Allergens↗

PubMed1992

Fish allergy: evaluation of the importance of cross-reactivity.

Fish constitute one of the most important groups of allergens in the induction of immediate (type I) food hypersensitivity. In our environment, fish allergy is present in 22% of all patients with a diagnosis of food hypersensitivity. We studied the allergenic significance of the fish species considered most representative because of their greater consumption in our environment (flatfishes: Pleuronectiformes such as sole, whiff, and witch; Gadiformes such as hake; and Scombriformes such as albacore) or because of the results of previous studies of Gadiformes such as cod. Through the use of isoelectric focusing and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis immunoblotting, we have observed that several allergens common to all these species are able to bind specific IgE from the sera of sensitized patients. This allergenic community has been confirmed by radioallergosorbent inhibition. Another group of species-specific allergens focuses in the regions at about pH 5 and with molecular weights less than 14 kilodaltons; these allergens correspond to sarcoplasmic parvoalbumins. From the results observed, which have been confirmed by various procedures and techniques, we conclude that hake is the fish with the capability to induce the strongest IgE response, followed by whiff; the witch seems to be the least allergenic of all flatfishes. Among all species studied, albacore was the least allergenic. These results may be considered when one introduces supplementary feeding with fish in infants, most particularly in infants at high risk for atopy.

Cross Reactions↗

PubMed1976