SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “genome duplications”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Gene and genome duplication.

Genomic sequencing projects have revealed the productivity of processes duplicating genes or entire chromosome segments. Substantial proportions of the yeast, Arabidopsis and human gene complements are made up of duplicates. This has prompted much interest in the processes of duplication, functional divergence and loss of genes, has renewed the debate on whether an early vertebrate genome was tetraploid, and has inspired mathematical models and algorithms in computational biology.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2006

Buffering of crucial functions by paleologous duplicated genes may contribute cyclicality to angiosperm genome duplication.

Genome duplication followed by massive gene loss has permanently shaped the genomes of many higher eukaryotes, particularly angiosperms. It has long been believed that a primary advantage of genome duplication is the opportunity for the evolution of genes with new functions by modification of duplicated genes. If so, then patterns of genetic diversity among strains within taxa might reveal footprints of selection that are consistent with this advantage. Contrary to classical predictions that duplicated genes may be relatively free to acquire unique functionality, we find among both Arabidopsis ecotypes and Oryza subspecies that SNPs encode less radical amino acid changes in genes for which there exists a duplicated copy at a "paleologous" locus than in "singleton" genes. Preferential retention of duplicated genes encoding long complex proteins and their unexpectedly slow divergence (perhaps because of homogenization) suggest that a primary advantage of retaining duplicated paleologs may be the buffering of crucial functions. Functional buffering and functional divergence may represent extremes in the spectrum of duplicated gene fates. Functional buffering may be especially important during "genomic turmoil" immediately after genome duplication but continues to act approximately 60 million years later, and its gradual deterioration may contribute cyclicality to genome duplication in some lineages.

Arabidopsis↗

PubMed2003

Turning the clock back on ancient genome duplication.

Complete genome sequence data led rapidly to the conclusion that ancient genome duplications had shaped the genomes of the model organisms Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Arabidopsis thaliana. Recent contributions have gone on to refine date estimates for these duplications and, in the case of Arabidopsis, to infer additional, more ancient, rounds of duplication by reconstructing gene order before the most recent duplication event. It is becoming widely accepted that an ancient duplication occurred before the radiation of the ray-finned fish. However, despite methodological advances and the availability of complete genome sequence data the debate over whether very ancient genome duplications have occurred early in the vertebrate lineage has not yet been fully resolved.

Animals↗

PubMed2026

Revisiting the genome assembly of Lupinus species reveals differential diploidization after a shared whole-genome duplication.

Accurate genome assemblies are essential for comparative genomics, yet Hi-C-guided scaffolding can introduce structural errors that misrepresent chromosome architecture and bias evolutionary inferences. Here, we identified pervasive scaffolding errors-including artificial fusions, internal inversions, and incomplete contig mounting-in 2 previously published Lupinus genomes (L. cosentinii and L. digitatus) using a segmentation method based on long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposon density. We reassembled both genomes, producing chromosome-level references of 472.7 Mb (16 chromosomes) and 427.2 Mb (21 chromosomes), with BUSCO completeness >98.5%. Synteny validation and reapplication of LTR profiling confirmed that all prior errors were resolved. Using these corrected genomes together with 4 additional Lupinus species and 2 outgroup legumes, we investigated postpolyploid evolution. Synonymous substitution rate (Ks) analysis revealed a genus-specific whole-genome duplication (WGD) event (Ks = 0.17) shared by all 6 Lupinus species. The proportion of WGD-derived genes varied markedly, from 60% in L. digitatus to only 36% in L. mutabilis, indicating differential diploidization. While all species retained a core set of WGD duplicates enriched in cytoskeleton organization, ion transport, and defense responses, each exhibited lineage-specific functional trajectories: cell wall modification in L. cosentinii and L. digitatus, nitrogen metabolism in L. albus and L. angustifolius, flower development in L. luteus, and stress/lipid metabolism in L. mutabilis. Our corrected assemblies provide optimal references for Lupinus comparative genomics, and our findings demonstrate that a shared WGD event can lead to both conserved and highly divergent postpolyploid fates, likely underpinning adaptive diversification within the genus.

Lupinus↗

PubMed2025

doubletrouble: an R/Bioconductor package for the identification, classification, and analysis of gene and genome duplications.

SUMMARY: Gene and genome duplications are major evolutionary forces that shape the diversity and complexity of life. However, different duplication modes have distinct impacts on gene function, expression, and regulation. Existing tools for identifying and classifying duplicated genes are either outdated or not user-friendly. Here, we present doubletrouble, an R/Bioconductor package that provides a comprehensive and robust framework for analyzing duplicated genes from genomic data. doubletrouble can detect and classify gene pairs as derived from six duplication modes (segmental, tandem, proximal, retrotransposon-derived, DNA transposon-derived, and dispersed duplications), calculate substitution rates, detect signatures of putative whole-genome duplication events, and visualize results as publication-ready figures. We applied doubletrouble to classify the duplicated gene repertoire in 822 eukaryotic genomes, and results were made available through a user-friendly web interface. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: doubletrouble is available on Bioconductor (https://bioconductor.org/packages/doubletrouble), and the source code is available in a GitHub repository (https://github.com/almeidasilvaf/doubletrouble). doubletroubledb is available online at https://almeidasilvaf.github.io/doubletroubledb/.

Software↗

PubMed2025

Gene and Genome Duplication in Spiders.

Gene and genome duplications are widely observed across various organisms, including plants, yeasts, and animals. Numerous studies link gene duplications to the emergence of novel phenotypes, supporting the hypothesis that duplication events are advantageous for adaptive evolution. Whole-genome duplications (WGD) are especially prevalent in plants and have also occurred ancestrally in vertebrates. However, large-scale duplication events in other animal groups remain understudied, partly due to limited genomic resources. Arthropods, particularly insects, represent one of the most diverse animal clades in terms of both species and phenotypic diversity. With increasing availability of chromosome-level genomes, large-scale duplications appear to be rare in insects but are more frequent in chelicerates (e.g. spiders, scorpions, and horseshoe crabs). This makes chelicerates an intriguing group for comparing the mechanisms, fates, and evolutionary impacts of large-scale duplications with those seen in plants and vertebrates. In this review, we synthesize and discuss current research on WGD in spiders and discuss different scenarios for genes following gene duplication events (conservation, nonfunctionalization, subfunctionalization, specialization, drift, neofunctionalization) in the context of experimental studies. We hypothesize if there might be common trajectories after duplication and how these could be tested.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

A novel possible mechanism for the genesis of genomic duplications and its experimental test.

Duplication of genomic regions is an important biological process associated with the appearance of gene families, the origin of alternative splicing, and the etiopathogenesis of genetic diseases. Different mechanisms for the genesis of duplications have been suggested, based mainly on structural analyses. However, experimental confirmation of those mechanisms is scarce, mostly because of a lack of information about the circumstances that triggered the rearrangements. Here, I characterize a duplication of about 300 kbp (kilobase pairs) that occurred in the course of a gene targeting experiment. Considering the structure of the locus and the triggering event, I suggest a likely mechanism for the genesis of this duplication which involves anomalous processing of contiguous Okazaki fragments during lagging strand replication. Most importantly, I provide experimental evidence to substantiate that the proposed mechanism can indeed lead to duplication of genomic segments. The model presented represents a novel mechanistic pathway that can explain a variety of rearrangements, including genomic tandem duplications and deletions.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia.

The duplication of entire genomes has long been recognized as having great potential for evolutionary novelties, but the mechanisms underlying their resolution through gene loss are poorly understood. Here we show that in the unicellular eukaryote Paramecium tetraurelia, a ciliate, most of the nearly 40,000 genes arose through at least three successive whole-genome duplications. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that the most recent duplication coincides with an explosion of speciation events that gave rise to the P. aurelia complex of 15 sibling species. We observed that gene loss occurs over a long timescale, not as an initial massive event. Genes from the same metabolic pathway or protein complex have common patterns of gene loss, and highly expressed genes are over-retained after all duplications. The conclusion of this analysis is that many genes are maintained after whole-genome duplication not because of functional innovation but because of gene dosage constraints.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Extent of genomic rearrangement after genome duplication in yeast.

Whole-genome duplication approximately 10(8) years ago was proposed as an explanation for the many duplicated chromosomal regions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here we have used computer simulations and analytic methods to estimate some parameters describing the evolution of the yeast genome after this duplication event. Computer simulation of a model in which 8% of the original genes were retained in duplicate after genome duplication, and 70-100 reciprocal translocations occurred between chromosomes, produced arrangements of duplicated chromosomal regions very similar to the map of real duplications in yeast. An analytical method produced an independent estimate of 84 map disruptions. These results imply that many smaller duplicated chromosomal regions exist in the yeast genome in addition to the 55 originally reported. We also examined the possibility of determining the original order of chromosomal blocks in the ancestral unduplicated genome, but this cannot be done without information from one or more additional species. If the genome sequence of one other species (such as Kluyveromyces lactis) were known it should be possible to identify 150-200 paired regions covering the whole yeast genome and to reconstruct approximately two-thirds of the original order of blocks of genes in yeast. Rates of interchromosome translocation in yeast and mammals appear similar despite their very different rates of homologous recombination per kilobase.

Chromosome Mapping↗

PubMed2005

Proceedings of the SMBE Tri-National Young Investigators' Workshop 2005. What is the role of genome duplication in the evolution of complexity and diversity?

Gene and genome duplications provide a source of genetic material for mutation, drift, and selection to act upon, making new evolutionary opportunities possible. As a result, many have argued that genome duplication is a dominant factor in the evolution of complexity and diversity. However, a clear correlation between a genome duplication event and increased complexity and diversity is not apparent, and there are inconsistencies in the patterns of diversity invoked to support this claim. Interestingly, several estimates of genome duplication events in vertebrates are preceded by multiple extinct lineages, resulting in preduplication gaps in extant taxa. Here we argue that gen(om)e duplication could contribute to reduced risk of extinction via functional redundancy, mutational robustness, increased rates of evolution, and adaptation. The timeline for these processes to unfold would not predict immediate increases in species diversity after the duplication event. Rather, reduced probabilities of extinction would predict a latent period between a genome duplication and its effect on species diversity or complexity. In this paper, we will develop the idea that genome duplication could contribute to species diversity through reduced probability of extinction.

Animals↗

PubMed2025

Discovery of additional ancient genome duplications in yeasts.

Whole genome duplication (WGD) has had profound macroevolutionary impacts on diverse lineages1,2, preceding adaptive radiations in vertebrates3-5, teleost fish6,7, and angiosperms8,9. In contrast to the many known ancient WGDs in animals10,11 and especially plants12-14, we are aware of evidence for only four in fungi15,16. The oldest of these occurred ~100 million years ago (mya) and is shared by ~60 extant Saccharomycetales species17,18, including the baker's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Fig. 1). Notably, this is the only known ancient WGD in the yeast subphylum Saccharomycotina. The dearth of ancient WGD events in fungi remains a mystery15. Some studies have suggested that fungal lineages that experience chromosome19 and genome15 duplication quickly go extinct, leaving no trace in the genomic record, while others contend that the lack of known WGD is due to an absence of data15,16. Under the second hypothesis, additional sampling and deeper sequencing of fungal genomes should lead to the discovery of more WGD events. Coupling hundreds of recently published genomes from nearly every described Saccharomycotina species with three additional long-read assemblies, we discovered three novel WGD events. While the functions of retained duplicate genes originating from these events are broad, they bear many similarities to the well-known WGD that occurred in the Saccharomycetales17. Our results suggest that WGD may be a more common evolutionary force in fungi than previously believed.

Convergent Evolution↗

PubMed2004

A comparative phylogenetic approach for dating whole genome duplication events.

MOTIVATION: Whole genome duplications have played a major role in determining the structure of eukaryotic genomes. Current evidence revealing large blocks of duplicated chromatin yields new insights into the evolutionary history of species, but also presents a major challenge for researchers attempting to utilize comparative genomics techniques. Understanding the timing of duplication events relative to divergence among taxa is critical to accurate and comprehensive cross-species comparisons. RESULTS: We describe a large-scale approach to estimate the timing of duplication events in a phylogenetic context. The methodology has been previously utilized for analysis of Arabidopsis and Saccharomyces duplication events. This new implementation provides a more flexible and reusable framework for these analyses. Scripts written in the Python programming language drive a number of freely available bioinformatics programs, creating a no-cost tool for researchers. The usefulness of the approach is demonstrated through genome-scale analysis of Arabidopsis and Oryza (rice) duplications. AVAILABILITY: Software and documentation are freely available from http://plantgenome.agtec.uga.edu/bioinformatics/dating/

Algorithms↗

PubMed2003

Patterns of genome duplication within the Brassica napus genome.

The progenitor diploid genomes (A and C) of the amphidiploid Brassica napus are extensively duplicated with 73% of genomic clones detecting two or more duplicate sequences within each of the diploid genomes. This comprehensive duplication of loci is to be expected in a species that has evolved through a polyploid ancestor. The majority of the duplicate loci within each of the diploid genomes were found in distinct linkage groups as collinear blocks of linked loci, some of which had undergone a variety of rearrangements subsequent to duplication, including inversions and translocations. A number of identical rearrangements were observed in the two diploid genomes, suggesting they had occurred before the divergence of the two species. A number of linkage groups displayed an organization consistent with centric fusion and (or) fission, suggesting this mechanism may have played a role in the evolution of Brassica genomes. For almost every genetically mapped locus detected in the A genome a homologous locus was found in the C genome; the collinear arrangement of these homologous markers allowed the primary regions of homoeology between the two genomes to be identified. At least 16 gross chromosomal rearrangements differentiated the two diploid genomes during their divergence from a common ancestor.

Brassica napus↗

PubMed2004

Genome duplication led to highly selective expansion of the Arabidopsis thaliana proteome.

Multiple ancient genome duplications in Arabidopsis thaliana provide unique opportunities to assess factors that influence the fates of duplicated genes. We have found that genes retained in duplicate following one round of genome duplication are significantly more likely to be retained in duplicate again after a subsequent genome duplication. Genes retained in duplicate form a functionally biased set and include a significant over-representation of genes involved in the regulation of transcription.

Arabidopsis↗

PubMed2006

Genome duplications of early vertebrates as a possible chronicle of the evolutionary history of the neural crest.

It is now accepted that ancestral vertebrates underwent two rounds of genome duplication. Here we test the possible utility of these genome duplication events as a reference time for the evolutionary history of vertebrates, by tracing the molecular evolutionary history of the genes involved in vertebrate neural crest development. For most transcription factors that are involved in neural crest specification, more than two paralogs are involved in that process. These were likely involved in the specification of the neural crest before the genome duplications occurred in ancestral vertebrates, although FoxD3 may have acquired that role after the genome duplications. By contrast, the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of neural crest cells is controlled by genes that evolved after the genome duplications, such as cadherin6, cadherin7, cadherin11, and rhoB. This suggests that primitive neural crest cells control their delamination by using a small or distinct set of cell adhesion molecules. Alternatively, these observations suggest that delamination of the neural crest evolved after the genome duplications. In that case, the neural crest might have evolved in sequential steps; the specification of the neural crest occurred before the genome duplications, and the neural crest acquired a new cell migration property after the genome duplications.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Coevolution of PERB11 (MIC) and HLA class I genes with HERV-16 and retroelements by extended genomic duplication.

The recent availability of genomic sequence information for the class I region of the MHC has provided an opportunity to examine the genomic organization of HLA class I (HLAcI) and PERB11/MIC genes with a view to explaining their evolution from the perspective of extended genomic duplications rather than by simple gene duplications and/or gene conversion events. Analysis of genomic sequence from two regions of the MHC (the alpha- and beta-blocks) revealed that at least 6 PERB11 and 14 HLAcI genes, pseudogenes, and gene fragments are contained within extended duplicated segments. Each segment was searched for the presence of shared (paralogous) retroelements by RepeatMasker in order to use them as markers of evolution, genetic rearrangements, and evidence of segmental duplications. Shared Alu elements and other retroelements allowed the duplicated segments to be classified into five distinct groups (A to E) that could be further distilled down to an ancient preduplication segment containing a HLA and PERB11 gene, an endogenous retrovirus (HERV-16), and distinctive retroelements. The breakpoints within and between the different HLAcI segments were found mainly within the PERB11 and HLA genes, HERV-16, and other retroelements, suggesting that the latter have played a major role in duplication and indel events leading to the present organization of PERB11 and HLAcI genes. On the basis of the features contained within the segments, a coevolutionary model premised on tandem duplication of single and multipartite genomic segments is proposed. The model is used to explain the origins and genomic organization of retroelements, HERV-16, DNA transposons, PERB11, and HLAcI genes as distinct segmental combinations within the alpha- and beta-blocks of the human MHC.

Alu Elements↗

PubMed2003

Phylogenetic analyses alone are insufficient to determine whether genome duplication(s) occurred during early vertebrate evolution.

The widely accepted notion that two whole-genome duplications occurred during early vertebrate evolution (the 2R hypothesis) stems from the fact that vertebrates often possess several genes corresponding to a single invertebrate homolog. However the number of genes predicted by the Human Genome Project is less than twice as many as in the Drosophila melanogaster or Caenorhabditis elegans genomes. This ratio could be explained by two rounds of genome duplication followed by extensive gene loss, by a single genome duplication, by sequential local duplications, or by a combination of any of the above. The traditional method used to distinguish between these possibilities is to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships of vertebrate genes to their invertebrate orthologs; ratios of invertebrate-to-vertebrate counterparts are then used to infer the number of gene duplication events. The lancelet, amphioxus, is the closest living invertebrate relative of the vertebrates, and unlike protostomes such as flies or nematodes, is therefore the most appropriate outgroup for understanding the genomic composition of the last common ancestor of all vertebrates. We analyzed the relationships of all available amphioxus genes to their vertebrate homologs. In most cases, one to three vertebrate genes are orthologous to each amphioxus gene (median number=2). Clearly this result, and those of previous studies using this approach, cannot distinguish between alternative scenarios of chordate genome expansion. We conclude that phylogenetic analyses alone will never be sufficient to determine whether genome duplication(s) occurred during early chordate evolution, and argue that a "phylogenomic" approach, which compares paralogous clusters of linked genes from complete amphioxus and human genome sequences, will be required if the pattern and process of early chordate genome evolution is ever to be reconstructed.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Whole-genome duplication followed by massive gene loss and specialization has long been postulated as a powerful mechanism of evolutionary innovation. Recently, it has become possible to test this notion by searching complete genome sequence for signs of ancient duplication. Here, we show that the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae arose from ancient whole-genome duplication, by sequencing and analysing Kluyveromyces waltii, a related yeast species that diverged before the duplication. The two genomes are related by a 1:2 mapping, with each region of K. waltii corresponding to two regions of S. cerevisiae, as expected for whole-genome duplication. This resolves the long-standing controversy on the ancestry of the yeast genome, and makes it possible to study the fate of duplicated genes directly. Strikingly, 95% of cases of accelerated evolution involve only one member of a gene pair, providing strong support for a specific model of evolution, and allowing us to distinguish ancestral and derived functions.

Codon↗