PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “histone deacetylation”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

17 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1978

Sodium butyrate inhibits histone deacetylation in cultured cells.

Sodium butyrate in millimolar concentrations causes an accumulation of acetylated histone species in a variety of vertebrate cell lines. In all lines tested, butyrate caused hyperacetylation of H3 and H4, and in rat IRC8 cells, H2A and H2B were also affected. In Friend erythroleukemic cells, butyrate also induces the synthesis of a nonhistone chromosomal protein, IP25. butyrate does not affect the rate of histone acetylation in cell-free extracts of nuclei of Friend cells. Rather, this fatty acid inhibits histone deacetylation. Cell-free extracts of either control cells or butyrate-grown cells contain comparable levels of histone-deacetylating activity. This in vitro activity is inhibited by the addition of butyrate to the extracts. Thus butyrate appears to be an inhibitor of histone deacetylases both in vivo and in vitro.

Acetylation↗
PubMed1978

Butyrate suppression of histone deacetylation leads to accumulation of multiacetylated forms of histones H3 and H4 and increased DNase I sensitivity of the associated DNA sequences.

Exposure of HeLa cells to Na butyrate leads to an accumulation of multiacetylated forms of histones H3 and H4. Our studies of histone acetylation in HeLa S-3 cells show that 7 mM butyrate suppresses the deacetylation of histones without influencing the rate of radioactive acetate incorporation. An alteration in nucleosome structure in highly acetylated chromatin is indicated by an increased rate of DNA degradation by DNase I. A close association of acetylated histones with the DNase I-sensitive sequences is confirmed by the finding that histones remaining after limited DNase I digestion are depleted in the multiacetylated forms of histones H3 and H4. DNase I treatment has also been found to selectively release [3H]acetyl-labeled H3 and H4 from avian erythrocyte nuclei under conditions previously shown to preferentially degrade the globlin genes in erthyrocyte chromatin. Our results are consistent with the view that histone acetylation provides a key to the mechanism for altering chromatin structure at the nucleosomal level, and that this may explain the selective DNase I sensitivity of transcriptionally active DNA sequences in different cell types.

Acetylation↗
PubMed1979

Histone deacetylation in nuclei isolated from hepatoma tissue culture cells. Inhibition by sodium butyrate.

Nuclei from hepatoma tissue culture (HTC) cells were isolated by standard methods and incubated in media commonly used for nuclease digestions (DNAase I and micrococcal nuclease) and for in vitro RNA synthesis. During the incubation, histones can be deacetylated from both control cells and cells treated with 6 mM sodium butyrate to enhance the levels of histone acetylation. Deacetylation of histone is much more apparent in nuclei isolated from sodium butyrate-treated cells. Inclusion of 6 mM sodium butyrate in the incubation medium effectively inhibits the endogenous deacetylase activity acting on histones H3 and H4, whereas sodium acetate at the same concentration has very little inhibitory effect.

Acetates↗
PubMed1978

Suppression of histone deacetylation in vivo and in vitro by sodium butyrate.

In HeLa cells which have been exposed to 5 mM sodium butyrate for 21 h, the level of histone acetylation is greatly increased as compared to control cells (Riggs, M.G., Whittaker, R.G., Neumann, J.R., and Ingram, V.R. (1977) Nature 268, 462-464). Our experiments indicate that the increase in the relative amounts of multiacetylated forms of histones H4 and H3 following butyrate treatment is the result of an inhibition of histone deacetylase activity.

Butyrates↗
PubMed2025

Heterochromatin-based silencing of a foreign tandem repeat in Drosophila melanogaster shows unusual biochemistry and temperature sensitivity.

Eukaryotic genomes are packaged into chromatin, a regulatory nucleoprotein assembly. Establishment, maintenance, and interconversion of chromatin states is required for correct patterns of gene expression, genome integrity, and survival. Transcriptionally repressive heterochromatin minimizes mobilization of transposable elements and limits expansion of other repetitive DNA, but mechanisms for recognition of the latter sequences are not well established. We previously demonstrated in Drosophila melanogaster that transcripts derived from 1360 and Invader4 transposon insertions can trigger local conversion of transcriptionally permissive euchromatin to heterochromatin through the piRNA system, but only in a subset of genomic locations near existing blocks of heterochromatin. Here we show that a ~9 kb tandem array of the 36-nucleotide lac operator (lacO) sequence of Escherichia coli can form ectopic heterochromatin at a similar subset of sites, resulting in variegating expression of an adjacent reporter gene. Heterochromatin Protein 1a (HP1a) and histone deacetylation are required for lacO repeat-induced silencing, but, contrasting with previously described Position Effect Variegation (PEV), we do not observe increased histone H3 lysine 9 methylation. Silencing is effective at 25°C and suppressed at 18°C (in contrast to canonical PEV, which is enhanced at 18°C), indicating involvement of a temperature-sensitive component. Temperature switching experiments show that lacO repeat-induced heterochromatin formation is reversible throughout larval development following an HP1a-dependent initiation step in the early embryo. We conclude that the Drosophila nucleus can recognize a completely foreign tandem repeat as a target for heterochromatin formation, and that the heterochromatin structure established is distinct from that of endogenous tandem arrays.

HP1a↗
PubMed2025

High temperature-responsive DEAR4 condensation confers thermotolerance through recruiting TOPLESS in Arabidopsis nucleus.

Global warming is harmful to plants and threatens crop yields in the world. In contrast to other abiotic stresses, the molecular mechanisms for plant high temperature perception and signaling are still not fully understood. Here, we report that transcription factor DREB AND EAR MOTIF PROTEIN 4 (DEAR4) positively regulates heat tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. We further reveal that DEAR4 proteins undergo liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) and high temperature could induce DEAR4 condensate formation in the nucleus. Moreover, DEAR4 recruits the transcriptional co-repressor TOPLESS (TPL) into the nuclear speckles under high temperature. The high temperature triggered DEAR4-TPL co-condensates enhance their transcriptional repression activity through modulating histone deacetylation levels of GASA5, which is a reported negative regulator of HEAT SHOCK PROTEINs (HSPs). A genome-wide transcriptional landscape study confirms that DEAR4 induces the expression of multiple HSPs. Taken together, we illustrate a transcriptional repression mechanism mediated by DEAR4 through LLPS to confer plants thermotolerance and open a new avenue for translating this knowledge into crops for improving their heat resistance.

Arabidopsis↗
PubMed2026

Dual Mechanisms Underlie the Repression of Repressor Element 1-Silencing Transcription Factor Expression in Lung Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Cells.

Recent advances in genetic analysis have led to further subtyping of small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). The major subtypes of SCLC are the achaete-scute family bHLH transcription factor 1 (ASCL1)-predominant (SCLC-A), neuronal differentiation 1 (NEUROD1)-predominant (SCLC-N), and POU class 2 homeobox 3 (POU2F3) (SCLC-P) subtypes. SCLC-A and SCLC-N tumors express chromogranin A (CHGA) and synaptophysin (SYP), but SCLC-P tumors do not. Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, another type of neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), also frequently expresses CHGA and SYP. Because CHGA and SYP expression is controlled by a transrepressor, repressor element 1-silencing transcription factor (REST), the mechanisms underlying REST suppression in NEC were investigated, with a focus on miRNAs and epigenetics, to determine the causes of the differences in the expression of CHGA and SYP between SCLC-A/N and SCLC-P cells. The results showed that miR-375-3p, which was induced by ASCL1 and NEUROD1, repressed REST expression by binding to the 3'-untranslated region of REST mRNA. Bisulfite sequencing and experiments using a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, and chromatin immunoprecipitation-based quantitative PCR revealed that promoter/enhancer hypermethylation and histone deacetylation causes REST gene inactivation in SCLC-A/N. These phenomena were also observed in a large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma cell line that expressed high levels of ASCL1 and NEUROD1. Taken together, these findings suggest that NEC has dual repressive effects on REST expression, resulting in strict regulation of the expression of CHGA, SYP, and other REST-controlled neuronal/neuroendocrine-specific genes.

Humans↗
PubMed2024

Mechanistic insights into steroid hormone-mediated regulation of the androgen receptor gene.

Expression of the androgen receptor is key to the response of cells and tissues to androgenic steroids, such as testosterone or dihydrotestosterone, as well as impacting the benefit of hormone-dependent therapies for endocrine diseases and hormone-dependent cancers. However, the mechanisms controlling androgen receptor expression are not fully understood, limiting our ability to effectively promote or inhibit androgenic signalling therapeutically. An autoregulatory loop has been described in which androgen receptor may repress its own expression in the presence of hormone, although the molecular mechanisms are not fully understood. In this work, we elucidate the mechanisms of autoregulation and demonstrate, for the first time, that a similar repression of the AR gene is facilitated by the progesterone receptor. We show that the progesterone receptor, like the androgen receptor binds to response elements within the AR gene to effect transcriptional repression in response to hormone treatment. Mechanistically, this repression involves hormone-dependent histone deacetylation within the AR 5'UTR region and looping between sequences in intron 2 and the transcription start site (TSS). This novel pathway controlling AR expression in response to hormone stimulation may have important implications for understanding cell or tissue selective receptor signalling.

Receptors, Androgen↗
PubMed2024

Differential expression and regulation of ADAD1, DMRTC2, PRSS54, SYCE1, SYCP1, TEX101, TEX48, and TMPRSS12 gene profiles in colon cancer tissues and their in vitro response to epigenetic drugs.

Colon cancer (CC) is a significant cause of death worldwide, particularly in Saudi Arabia. To increase the accuracy of diagnosis and treatment, it is important to discover new specific biomarkers for CC. The main objectives of this research are to identify potential specific biomarkers for the early diagnosis of CC by analyzing the expressions of eight cancer testis (CT) genes, as well as to analyze how epigenetic mechanisms control the expression of these genes in CC cell lines. Tissue samples were collected from 15 male patients with CC tissues and matched NC tissues for gene expression analysis. The expression levels of specific CT genes, including ADAD1, DMRTC2, PRSS54, SYCE1, SYCP1, TEX101, TEX48, and TMPRSS12, were assessed using quantitative techniques. To validate the gene expression patterns, we used publicly available CC statistics. To investigate the effect of inhibition of DNA methylation and histone deacetylation on CT gene expression, in vitro experiments were performed using HCT116 and Caco-2 cell lines. There was no detected expression of the genes neither in the patient samples nor in NC tissues, except for TEX48, which exhibited upregulation in CC samples compared to NC tissues in online datasets. Notably, CT genes showed expression in testis samples. In vitro, experiments demonstrated significant enhancement in mRNA expression levels of ADAD1, DMRTC2, PRSS54, SYCE1, SYCP1, TEX101, TEX48, and TMPRSS12 following treatment with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine and trichostatin A in HCT116 and Caco-2 cell lines. Epigenetic treatments modify the expression of CT genes, indicating that these genes can potentially be used as biomarkers for CC. The importance of conducting further research to understand and target epigenetic mechanisms to improve CC treatment cannot be overemphasized.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

CRISPR-mediated proximity labeling unveils ABHD14B as a host factor to regulate HBV cccDNA transcriptional activity.

BACKGROUND: The long-term goal of chronic hepatitis B research is a functional cure (HBsAg seroclearance). Although currently used nucleos(t)ide analogs can efficiently inhibit viral replication, they do not reduce viral RNAs or proteins produced from covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), and rarely achieve a functional cure. To overcome this situation, revealing the mode of the existence of cccDNA is required, including identifying the interreacting proteins with cccDNA. Here, we aimed to identify novel proteins that interact with cccDNA. METHODS: Using an in vitro HBV infection model and a sequence-specific proximity labelling method consisting of dead Cas9 and biotin identification (BioID2), we comprehensively determined proteins that possibly interact with cccDNA. After identifying the candidate proteins, the HBV RNA transcription levels were examined by knocking out the associated genes. RESULTS: We identified ABHD14B as a protein that interacts with cccDNA and inhibits HBV RNA transcription from cccDNA. ABHD14B decreases the acetylation levels of histone proteins that control the transcription levels of HBV RNA in cccDNA. Moreover, ABHD14B interacts with TFII-I, which binds directly to cccDNA in a sequence-dependent manner. These results suggest that the host protein, ABHD14B, is recruited to cccDNA via the TFII-I protein, inhibiting HBV RNA transcription from cccDNA by deacetylating cccDNA histones. CONCLUSIONS: ABHD14B was newly identified as a suppressor of HBV RNA transcription from cccDNA, which may improve our understanding of the mode of existence of cccDNA, providing a basis for development of a functional cure.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Mechanistic insights into CAR-mediated repression of the HNF4α-FABP1 axis and inhibition of HepG2 cell proliferation.

The constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) modulates the transcription of numerous genes involving drug metabolism, energy homeostasis, and cell proliferation. While rodent studies suggest an oncogenic role for murine CAR in liver cancer development, emerging evidence indicates that human CAR (hCAR) may exhibit a tumor-suppressive role in hepatocellular carcinoma; notably, overexpressing hCAR suppresses human hepatoma cell proliferation. Yet, the molecular mechanisms whereby hCAR suppresses hepatoma cell proliferation are poorly understood. Our recent RNA-seq analysis of human hepatoma cells revealed that fatty acid binding protein 1 (FABP1), a pleiotropic modulator of lipid metabolism and cancer progression, was a top gene downregulated by hCAR. Here, we report a molecular mechanism whereby hCAR downregulates FABP1 expression by modulating HNF4α signaling. Knocking down hCAR expression in a HepG2-hCAR stable cell line restores the suppressed expression of FABP1 and HNF4α, while knocking down HNF4α alone is sufficient to suppress FABP1 expression. Luciferase reporter assays revealed concentration-dependent hCAR suppression of HNF4α-mediated FABP1 transactivation. This inhibitory crosstalk between hCAR and HNF4α was further confirmed by chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, where hCAR decreased HNF4α occupancy of the FABP1 promoter. Mechanistically, hCAR inhibits HNF4α expression by prompting deacetylation of histone H3 in the HNF4α P1 enhancer region, resulting in a repressive chromatin configuration and reduced HNF4α transcription. Furthermore, overexpressing FABP1 partially rescued hCAR-suppressed cell growth. Collectively, these results uncover the hCAR-HNF4α-FABP1 axis as a novel mechanism underlying hCAR-mediated gene repression.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Unraveling the c-Myc-CASC19/HDAC1-NPM1 epigenetic axis: A novel regulatory circuitry and therapeutic target in gastric carcinogenesis.

Mounting evidence implicates long non-coding RNA cancer susceptibility candidate 19 (CASC19) in the pathogenesis of diverse malignancies. However, its functional role and molecular mechanisms in gastric cancer (GC) remain elusive. Herein, we identified a novel 717-bp transcript isoform of CASC19 in GC cells. This study aimed to delineate the biological functions and underlying mechanisms of this novel CASC19 transcript in GC pathogenesis. CASC19 was significantly upregulated in GC tissues and cell lines, correlating with adverse clinicopathological features and poor prognosis in GC patients. Functional investigations demonstrated that CASC19 overexpression potentiated GC cell proliferation, metastasis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition, whereas CASC19 knockdown attenuated these malignant phenotypes and suppressed tumorigenesis in xenograft models. Mechanistically, CASC19 functioned as a molecular scaffold by recruiting histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) to the nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) promoter. This recruitment sustained H3K27 deacetylation, thereby transcriptionally repressing NPM1 promoter activity and accelerating gastric carcinogenesis. Crucially, Depletion of HDAC1 or NPM1 partial rescued CASC19-mediated oncogenic effects. Intriguingly, the transcription factor c-Myc was found to transcriptionally activate CASC19 through direct binding to its promoter region. Collectively, our findings indicate that the c-Myc-CASC19/HDAC1-NPM1 axis acts as a potential prognostic biomarker candidate for GC and may represent a therapeutic vulnerability worthy of future investigation.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Histone deacetylases: From acetylation homeostasis to oncogenic and neurodegenerative disorders.

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are central regulators of acetylation homeostasis, governing chromatin architecture, transcriptional dynamics, and diverse cellular processes through reversible lysine deacetylation. Dysregulation of HDAC activity disrupts epigenetic balance and is strongly implicated in oncogenic transformation and the progression of neurodegenerative disorders. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of HDAC biology with a particular emphasis on experimental and analytical methodologies used to investigate their function. We describe the structural and functional diversity of HDAC classes and their roles in multiprotein complexes that regulate gene expression and cellular signaling. A major focus is placed on screening-compatible and mechanistic assays, including fluorometric, colorimetric, radiometric, fluorescence polarization, TR-FRET, AlphaScreen/AlphaLISA, and differential scanning fluorimetry approaches for quantitative measurement of enzymatic activity and inhibitor profiling. In addition, advanced methodologies such as mass spectrometry-based acetylome analysis, chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq), recombinant enzyme assays, and cell-based reporter systems are discussed in the context of functional genomics and drug discovery. The integration of high-throughput screening, structural biology, and multi-omics strategies is highlighted as essential for dissecting HDAC-mediated regulatory networks. Collectively, this chapter serves as a methodological framework for studying HDAC function and developing targeted epigenetic therapies in cancer and neurodegenerative diseases.

Histone Deacetylases↗
PubMed2024

Reversion from basal histone H4 hypoacetylation at the replication fork increases DNA damage in FANCA deficient cells.

The FA/BRCA pathway safeguards DNA replication by repairing interstrand crosslinks (ICL) and maintaining replication fork stability. Chromatin structure, which is in part regulated by histones posttranslational modifications (PTMs), has a role in maintaining genomic integrity through stabilization of the DNA replication fork and promotion of DNA repair. An appropriate balance of PTMs, especially acetylation of histones H4 in nascent chromatin, is required to preserve a stable DNA replication fork. To evaluate the acetylation status of histone H4 at the replication fork of FANCA deficient cells, we compared histone acetylation status at the DNA replication fork of isogenic FANCA deficient and FANCA proficient cell lines by using accelerated native immunoprecipitation of nascent DNA (aniPOND) and in situ protein interactions in the replication fork (SIRF) assays. We found basal hypoacetylation of multiple residues of histone H4 in FA replication forks, together with increased levels of Histone Deacetylase 1 (HDAC1). Interestingly, high-dose short-term treatment with mitomycin C (MMC) had no effect over H4 acetylation abundance at the replication fork. However, chemical inhibition of histone deacetylases (HDAC) with Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) induced acetylation of the FANCA deficient DNA replication forks to levels comparable to their isogenic control counterparts. This forced permanence of acetylation impacted FA cells homeostasis by inducing DNA damage and promoting G2 cell cycle arrest. Altogether, this caused reduced RAD51 foci formation and increased markers of replication stress, including phospho-RPA-S33. Hypoacetylation of the FANCA deficient replication fork, is part of the cellular phenotype, the perturbation of this feature by agents that prevent deacetylation, such as SAHA, have a deleterious effect over the delicate equilibrium they have reached to perdure despite a defective FA/BRCA pathway.

Histones↗
PubMed2025

HDAC6-dependent deacetylation of SAE2 enhances SUMO1 conjugation for mitotic integrity.

Mammalian cells express three conjugatable SUMO variants: SUMO1 and the closely related SUMO2 and SUMO3 (together referred to as SUMO2/3). While some substrates are modified by both, others show a clear preference, though the basis for this selectivity remains unclear. Here, we examine a modification of the catalytic component of the human SUMO activation enzyme, SAE2. We find that lysine 164 of SAE2 undergoes HDAC6-dependent deacetylation during mitosis. A non-deacetylatable acetyl-mimetic mutant, SAE2-K164Q, selectively enhances SUMO2 over SUMO1 activation and conjugation, and distinguishes between SUMO1 and SUMO2/3 based on differences in their C-terminal tails. Complementation of SAE2-deficient or inhibited cells with SAE2-K164Q suppresses mitotic SUMO1 conjugation and promotes multipolar spindle formation. We identify NuMA as a SUMO E1-dependent substrate and demonstrate that mitotic defects caused by SAE2-K164Q or HDAC6 inhibition are rescued by SUMO1 overexpression or expression of a GFP-SUMO1-NuMA-K1766R fusion. These results support a model in which SAE1:SAE2 deacetylation during early mitosis promotes SUMO1 conjugation to ensure mitotic fidelity, highlighting a regulatory role for the SUMO-activating enzyme in the selection of SUMO proteins.

Humans↗