PubMed HealthSearch

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “immunoaffinity LC-MS/MS”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Mass spectrometry-based ligand binding assays in biomedical research.

INTRODUCTION: Ligand binding assays combining immunoaffinity enrichment steps with mass spectrometry (MS) readout have gained attention as a highly specific and sensitive tool for protein quantification. These techniques typically combine enzymatic fragmentation of the sample or enriched protein with capture on the protein or peptide-level for quantification. Antibodies ensure specific target recognition, while MS offers quantitative accuracy with isotopically labeled internal standards. This dual approach supports a broad dynamic range, enabling protein measurements from picomolar to nanomolar levels. These methods have diverse applications, from quantifying signaling proteins in basic research to biomarker monitoring in clinical trials and analyzing the pharmacokinetics of therapeutic proteins. AREAS COVERED: This review delves into the diverse workflows of immunoaffinity-MS, shedding light on the innovative strategies employed, their practical applications, efficacy, and inherent limitations in the realm of protein quantification. EXPERT OPINION: Immunoaffinity-MS has transformed protein analysis, but widespread adoption is hindered by complex workflows, high instrument costs, and limited capture molecule availability. Efforts to enhance automation, standardize workflows, and advance technological innovation aim to overcome these barriers. Improvements in mass spectrometer sensitivity, advances in recombinant capture technologies, and support from public initiatives are poised to further improve the reliability and accessibility of this method.

Mass Spectrometry

Interlaboratory Comparison of a Glucagon and Oxyntomodulin Immuno-LC-MS/MS Assay: Implications for Diabetes Research.

BACKGROUND: The quantification of plasma glucagon and oxyntomodulin is important in the assessment of α-cell function, which is impaired in patients with diabetes. We aimed to transfer between laboratories a novel assay that uses liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for the sensitive and specific measurement of these highly homologous hormones. METHODS: Simultaneous measurement of glucagon and oxyntomodulin used immunoaffinity enrichment and LC-MS/MS. Immunoenrichment used monoclonal antibodies that are available at-cost to researchers (deposited at the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank). Pure synthetic glucagon, characterized for purity and concentration, was used as a calibrant and is available to others. A detailed standard operating procedure was shared between 3 laboratories and the performance of the method was evaluated with samples collected from patients with and without diabetes. Method comparison was made with 2 commercially available, FDA-registered glucagon immunoassays. RESULTS: The method was linear over the normal range (1-20 pM). When measured in duplicate, the median interlaboratory imprecision (%CV) of the measurement of 40 samples was 6.3% (IQR 4.5%) and 14.4% (IQR 12.4%) for glucagon and oxyntomodulin, respectively. Method comparison with commercially available immunoassays demonstrated good (Mercodia, R = 0.92) or fair (Ansh, R = 0.70) agreement. Multivariable linear regression using LC-MS/MS glucagon and oxyntomodulin concentrations to predict immunoassay results indicated significant cross-reactivity of each immunoassay with oxyntomodulin. CONCLUSION: We have validated a sensitive and specific assay for glucagon and oxyntomodulin that can be deployed in high-complexity clinical laboratories for research or the care of patients. Commercially available glucagon immunoassays have significant interference from molecules other than glucagon.

Journal Article