PubMed HealthSearch

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “large language model”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

An embedding-based framework enables statistical testing of gene-set function hypotheses inferred by large language models.

Emerging large language models (LLMs) can infer gene functions directly from gene lists, enabling hypothesis generation without predefined gene sets. However, these LLM-derived predictions are qualitative, and principled statistical validation is lacking. Here, we develop an embedding-based statistical framework that transforms gene and function descriptions into vector representations, enabling statistical testing of gene-gene and gene-function relationships and quantitative prioritization of de novo functional hypotheses inferred by LLMs. We benchmark seven state-of-the-art embedding models using curated and retrieval-augmented literature-derived gene descriptions across diverse biological contexts. OpenAI's text-embedding-3-large and Google's gemini-embedding-001 perform best, capturing gene-gene functional relationships in 88.7-92.5% of Gene Ontology biological processes and approximately 98.6% of canonical pathways. In gene-function association analyses, these models achieve high sensitivity (95.2-98.4%) and specificity (72.7-84.3%). Through contamination analysis and evaluation using experimentally informed protein assembly gene sets, our framework distinguishes biologically meaningful LLM-inferred hypotheses from noise, outperforming confidence-based inference and conventional enrichment analysis. We further develop the open-source R package DEGEmbedR and demonstrate its utility for interpreting a drug perturbation-derived differentially expressed gene (DEG) signature lacking significant conventional enrichment results. Together, these results establish LLM-derived embeddings as a quantitative foundation for functional genomics and the statistical validation of LLM-based gene function inference.

Large Language Models

Out-of-the-box bioinformatics capabilities of large language models (LLMs).

Large Language Models (LLMs), AI agents and co-scientists promise to accelerate scientific discovery across fields ranging from chemistry to biology. Bioinformatics- the analysis of DNA, RNA and protein sequences plays a crucial role in biological research and is especially amenable to AI-driven automation given its computational nature. Here, we assess the bioinformatics capabilities of three popular general-purpose LLMs on a set of tasks covering basic analytical questions that include code writing and multi-step reasoning in the domain. Utilizing questions from Rosalind, a bioinformatics educational platform, we compare the performance of the LLMs vs. humans on 104 questions undertaken by 110 to 68,760 individuals globally. GPT-3.5 provided correct answers for 59/104 (58%) questions, while Llama-3-70B and GPT-4o answered 49/104 (47%) correctly. GPT-3.5 was the best performing in most categories, followed by Llama-3-70B and then GPT-4o. 71% of the questions were correctly answered by at least one LLM. The best performing categories included DNA analysis, while the worst performing were sequence alignment/comparative genomics and genome assembly. Overall, LLMs performance mirrored that of humans with lower performance in tasks in which humans had low performance and vice versa. However, LLMs also failed in some instances where most humans were correct and, in a few cases, LLMs excelled where most humans failed. To the best of our knowledge, this presents the first assessment of general purpose LLMs on basic bioinformatics tasks in distinct areas relative to the performance of hundreds to thousands of humans. LLMs provide correct answers to several questions that require use of biological knowledge, reasoning, statistical analysis and computer code.

Journal Article

Benchmarking large language models for genomic knowledge with GeneTuring.

Large language models (LLMs) show promise in biomedical research, but their effectiveness for genomic inquiry remains unclear. We developed GeneTuring, a benchmark consisting of 16 genomics tasks with 1,600 curated questions, and manually evaluated 48,000 answers from ten LLM configurations, including GPT-4o (via API, ChatGPT with web access, and a custom GPT setup), GPT-3.5, Claude 3.5, Gemini Advanced, GeneGPT (both slim and full), BioGPT, and BioMedLM. A custom GPT-4o configuration integrated with NCBI APIs, developed in this study as SeqSnap, achieved the best overall performance. GPT-4o with web access and GeneGPT demonstrated complementary strengths. Our findings highlight both the promise and current limitations of LLMs in genomics, and emphasize the value of combining LLMs with domain-specific tools for robust genomic intelligence. GeneTuring offers a key resource for benchmarking and improving LLMs in biomedical research.

Benchmark

Large language models in bioinformatics: a comprehensive survey.

The emergence of foundation models with trillion-level parameters has redefined the landscape of artificial intelligence. Various fields are developing their own large-scale models, which can solve many problems within the field and improve work efficiency. Biological large-scale models are a cross-disciplinary research field that combines mathematics, computer science, and biology, aiming to simulate and understand the structure, function, and dynamic changes of biological systems through the establishment of complex computational models. This field covers multiple levels such as biological pathways, population dynamics, protein folding, etc., providing us with tools for deep exploration of the mysteries of life and applications in medicine, ecology, and other fields. This article reviews the background and research status of biological large-scale models, and discusses future directions. Large language models (LLMs) and other large-scale foundation models have rapidly advanced in recent years, enabling powerful representation learning and generation across text, sequences, and multimodal data. In bioinformatics and biomedicine, these models are increasingly used to analyze genomic sequences, infer protein properties and structures, support drug discovery, and integrate heterogeneous biomedical evidence. This survey reviews the basic principles of LLMs and summarizes representative applications in (i) gene and genome sequence analysis, (ii) protein structure and function prediction, and (iii) drug design, including virtual screening and personalized medicine. We also discuss emerging multi-model modeling approaches, as well as key challenges such as data quality and privacy, interpretability, generalization to new organisms and tasks, and responsible deployment in health-related settings. Finally, we outline future directions for developing reliable, scalable, and explainable bioinformatics foundation models.

bioinformatics

Dataset Readiness Assessment With Large Language Model (DRAFT-LLM): A Multi-Axis Audit Guided by LLM.

This article details the Dataset Readiness Assessment for Training (DRAFT), a systematic method for determining whether a high-dimensional biological dataset is suitable for developing reliable, equitable (i.e., the extent to which model performance, error patterns, and potential benefits or harms are evaluated and found to be acceptably distributed across relevant demographic, biological, clinical, and contextual subgroups), and scientifically meaningful machine-learning models, and DRAFT Large Language Model (DRAFT-LLM), its optional human-in-the-loop extension for calibrating study-specific audits through structured, critically reviewed LLM guidance. Standard model validation often fails to detect when apparent performance is driven by spurious correlations, technical artifacts, or hidden stratification, leading to irreproducible and inequitable findings. DRAFT-LLM addresses this gap by shifting the focus from model tuning to structured dataset auditing, organized around Support Protocols 1 to 4 that capture the scientific intent, data structure, and governance constraints of a given study. These Support Protocols: (1) elicit and formalize investigator input into a study intake and dataset card; (2) compute standardized dataset statistics and structural summaries suitable for downstream analysis and LLM context; (3) configure the language model using form-based responses, safety guardrails, and governance rules; and (4) generate personalized instructions, prompts, and code templates for running DRAFT audits. Basic Protocols 1 to 3 are instantiated from this support layer for generalization, equity, and stability: they are reusable execution patterns whose concrete behavior is determined by the cards, statistics, and configurations defined in the Support Protocols. DRAFT-LLM and DRAFT are demonstrated in this article through an end-to-end case study on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). © 2026 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Support Protocol 1: Study intake and dataset card construction Support Protocol 2: Dataset structure and advanced summary statistics for LLM context Support Protocol 3: LLM configuration using structured form responses Support Protocol 4: Generation of personalized instructions for DRAFT audits Basic Protocol 1: Generalization audit Basic Protocol 2: Equity audit Basic Protocol 3: Stability audit.

Large Language Models

Searching the druggable genome using large language models.

SUMMARY: The druggable genome encompasses the genes that are known or predicted to interact with drugs. The Drug-Gene Interaction Database (DGIdb) provides an integrated resource for discovering and contextualizing these interactions, supporting a broad range of research and clinical applications. DGIdb is currently accessed through structured web interfaces and API calls, requiring users to translate natural-language questions into database-specific query patterns. To allow for the use of DGIdb through natural language, we developed the DGIdb Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, which allows large language models (LLMs) access to up-to-date information through the DGIdb API. We demonstrate that the MCP server improves an LLM's ability to answer questions requiring accurate, up-to-date biomedical knowledge drawn from structured external resources. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The DGIdb MCP server is detailed at https://github.com/dgidb/dgidb-mcp-server and includes instructions for accessing the server through the Claude desktop app.

Large Language Models

Evaluation of a cornea-specialized large language model for diagnostic and management accuracy in complex corneal cases.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether a cornea-specialized large language model (LLM) enhanced with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) improves clinicians' diagnostic and management accuracy in complex corneal cases compared to a general-purpose GPT-4o model and unaided clinician performance. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, masked evaluation study involved three cornea trainees who each independently reviewed 39 real-world corneal cases under three experimental conditions: unaided, GPT-4o-assisted, and assisted by a cornea-specialized GPT-4o model. The cornea-specialized model was constructed by embedding over 200 publicly available Wikipedia articles into GPT-4o's RAG framework. Participants provided open-ended diagnoses and selected the next-step management options (multiple choice). They were allowed up to three GPT-4o queries per case, and the AI-assisted arms were randomized to minimize bias. Accuracy for both tasks was compared against expert reference standards using McNemar's test. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy was 48.7%, 20.5%, and 38.5% unaided, improving to 69.2%, 46.2%, and 59.0% with general GPT-4o (p<0.04). The cornea-specialized GPT-4o further improved accuracy to 71.8%, 48.7%, and 74.4%, with improvements over unaided performance for all clinicians (p<0.01). For next-step decisions, unaided accuracy was 76.9%, 87.2%, and 59.0%. With the specialized model, Ophthalmologist 3 improved to 71.8% (p<0.05), Ophthalmologist 1 remained high at 82.1%, and Ophthalmologist 2 declined to 64.1% (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A cornea-specialized LLM enhanced with RAG improved diagnostic accuracy in complex corneal cases, particularly among clinicians with lower baseline performance. Effects on management accuracy were inconsistent. Future studies should explore the use of open-ended management tasks and examine whether smaller, curated retrieval corpora yield better model performance.

Humans

The landscape of pruning for large language models: A systematic review and unified taxonomy.

Confronting the inherent tension between the exceptional capabilities and the immense computational costs of Large Language Models (LLMs), pruning has become a crucial technique for achieving efficient deployment. However, a systematic analytical framework dedicated specifically to LLM pruning remains absent. In this paper, we aim to bridge this gap. We first elucidate the theoretical foundations that underpin the effectiveness of pruning, namely overparameterization and redundancy, and then propose a multidimensional taxonomy that organizes existing approaches along the axes of granularity, timing, and criteria. Building upon this unified perspective, we further analyze performance recovery mechanisms and the broader evaluation ecosystem, while also exploring forward-looking challenges such as interpretability, automation, and hardware-algorithm co-design. Through this comprehensive synthesis, we seek to provide an integrated and coherent analytical lens for advancing both research and practice in LLM pruning.

Large Language Models

Benchmarking large language models for extracting biobank-derived insights into health and disease.

Biobank-scale datasets such as the UK Biobank have become foundational resources for advancing biomedical discovery. Yet the complexity and heterogeneity of these resources, spanning genomics, imaging, clinical records, and metadata, pose substantial barriers to access and interpretation. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a promising avenue for making such datasets more navigable through natural language interfaces. However, the extent to which current general-purpose LLMs can retrieve and synthesize biobank-specific insights has not yet been systematically evaluated. In this study, we present a reproducible, multi-metric evaluation framework to benchmark the capabilities of leading LLMs. We evaluated six leading large language models: Gemini 3 Pro, Claude Opus 4.5, Claude Sonnet 4.5, GPT-5.2, Mistral Large 2, and DeepSeek V3, on four benchmark tasks designed to assess biobank-related knowledge retrieval. We evaluate model performance across six dimensions (semantic accuracy, factual correctness, domain knowledge, reasoning quality, response depth, and biobank specificity) and assessed output consistency using curated UK Biobank references and a robust random baseline. All models outperformed the baseline by 2&#xd7; to 3&#xd7;&#x2009;, with strong statistical separation (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), confirming meaningful biobank-specific knowledge retrieval. Gemini 3 Pro achieved the highest overall accuracy across tasks such as keyword synthesis, institution recognition, and topic inference, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 demonstrated the most uniform performance across evaluation dimensions. Our benchmark provides a rigorous framework for evaluating LLMs in biomedical settings. Using the UK Biobank as a real-world testbed, we highlight both the capabilities and limitations of current models, measuring their capacity to recall structured biomedical knowledge consistent with authoritative biobank metadata.

Large Language Models

Harnessing the Power of Large Language Models for Drug Discovery: A Systematic Review of Current Applications and Future Directions.

INTRODUCTION: The demand for inventive approaches to drug discovery has increased due to the rising costs, time, and failure rates in pharmaceutical research. Large Language Models (LLMs), with their sophisticated natural language processing and generative capabilities, have become potent instruments that have the potential to revolutionize biomedical research. The function of LLMs in different phases of drug development is methodically examined in this article. METHODS: The PRISMA 2020 principles were adhered to in this systematic study. A thorough search for research published between 2018 and 2025 was done using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The search terms "large language model," "transformer," "drug discovery," and important sub-domains (such as "de-novo design" and "ADMET") were merged, and two reviewers independently screened the results. Predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to filter studies for relevance. 98 studies out of the 1,285 records that were initially retrieved met the requirements for the final qualitative synthesis. RESULTS: 98 studies that demonstrated the use of LLMs in various drug discovery domains were found during the review. These covered molecular generation, genomics, protein-ligand modeling, ADME/T and toxicity profiling, drug-target interaction and DTI prediction, and biomedical text mining. 42 different LLM-based tools were mapped, including BioBERT, SciSpacy, Drug- LLM, DNA-BERT, GPT-4, and ChatGPT. Predictive accuracy, hypothesis creation, target prioritization, and multi-modal data integration all showed notable gains with these techniques. DISCUSSION: By providing scalable, precise, and effective solutions for data-driven drug discovery, LLMs are revolutionizing the pharmaceutical industry. They allow for the creation of hypotheses and individualized insights across multi-modal biological data, and they perform better than conventional approaches in a number of subdomains. Improvements in performance were task-dependent; the most consistent gains occurred for biomedical text mining, disease-genedrug relationship mapping and drug-target interaction prediction tasks. Yet most evidence for clinical applications is still derived from retrospective studies and benchmark datasets, suggesting a higher need for prospective validation. CONCLUSION: There is revolutionary potential in incorporating LLMs into drug discovery processes. Clinical translation and regulatory uptake will depend heavily on collaborative validation, ethical deployment, and standardization as models become more multimodal and interpretable. Before normal use, extensive prospective benchmarking and head-to-head comparisons with established chemoinformatics pipelines are necessary.

De novo design

Searching the Druggable Genome using Large Language Models.

SUMMARY: The druggable genome encompasses the genes that are known or predicted to interact with drugs. The Drug-Gene Interaction Database (DGIdb) provides an integrated resource for discovering and contextualizing these interactions, supporting a broad range of research and clinical applications. DGIdb is currently accessed through structured web interfaces and API calls, requiring users to translate natural-language questions into database-specific query patterns. To allow for the use of DGIdb through natural language, we developed the DGIdb Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, which allows large language models (LLMs) access to up-to-date information through the DGIdb API. We demonstrate that the MCP server greatly enhances an LLM's ability to answer questions requiring accurate, up-to-date biomedical knowledge drawn from structured external resources. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The DGIdb MCP server is detailed at https://github.com/griffithlab/dgidb-mcp-server and includes instructions for accessing the server through the Claude desktop app.

Journal Article

Integrating expert knowledge into large language models improves performance for psychiatric reasoning and diagnosis.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: The authors sought to evaluate the performance of common large language models (LLMs) in psychiatric diagnosis, and the impact of integrating expert-derived reasoning on their performance. Clinical case vignettes and associated diagnoses were retrieved from the DSM-5-TR Clinical Cases book. Diagnostic decision trees were retrieved from the DSM-5-TR Handbook of Differential Diagnosis and refined for LLM use. Three LLMs were prompted to provide diagnosis candidates for the vignettes either by directly prompting or using the decision trees. These candidates and diagnostic categories were compared against the correct diagnoses. The positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, and F1 statistic were used to measure performance. RESULTS: When directly prompted to predict diagnoses, the best LLM by F1 statistic (gpt-4o) had sensitivity of 76.7 % and PPV of 40.4 %. When making use of the refined decision trees, PPV was significantly increased (65.3 %) without a significant reduction in sensitivity (70.9 %). Across all experiments, the use of the decision trees statistically significantly increased the PPV, significantly increased the F1 statistic in 5/6 experiments, and significantly reduced sensitivity in 4/6 experiments. DISCUSSION: When used to predict psychiatric diagnoses from case vignettes, direct prompting of the LLMs yielded most true positive diagnoses but had significant overdiagnosis. Integrating expert-derived reasoning into the process using decision trees improved LLM performance (as measured by F1 statistic), primarily by suppressing overdiagnosis with a lower-magnitude negative impact on sensitivity. This suggests that the integration of clinical expert-derived reasoning could improve the performance of LLM-based tools in the behavioral health setting.

Humans

A bimodal large language model reduces misalignment in patient education: A double-blinded randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Effective patient education requires accurate communication aligned with patients' emotional and semantical needs. Text-based large language models (LLMs) lack access to non-verbal cues, which may contribute to misaligned responses. METHODS: We evaluated emotional and semantic misalignment in a text-based LLM using 64,200 utterances from 16,583 patient education cases across six departments and three centers. Dolphin was developed integrating text and audio cues and evaluated through emotion recognition, semantic consistency assessment, branch-level ablations, and a double-blinded randomized trial against a matched text-based LLM comparator (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: (ChiCTR2500095933). FINDINGS: The text-based LLM showed emotional misalignment in 36.7% of responses and semantic misalignment in 28.3% of cases, with higher misalignment under greater burden. Dolphin outperformed the text-based LLM in emotion recognition accuracy (0.886 vs. 0.713) and semantic consistency (84.9% vs. 82.1%; both adjusted p < 0.001). Ablations supported contribution of audio branches. Dolphin received higher expert ratings than the text-based LLM and human educators (all p < 0.001). In 555 patients, Dolphin was associated with greater patient satisfaction (98.6% vs. 93.8%), suggestion acceptance (76.1% vs. 58.9%; p < 0.001), proactive disclosure (44.6% vs. 26.5%; p < 0.001), and fewer 7-day unplanned recontact (12.9% vs. 22.9%; p = 0.002). No unsafe recommendations or safety events were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with text-based LLM, Dolphin improved emotional-semantic alignment and patient-education outcomes, supporting bimodal alignment as a strategy for reducing misalignment-driven communication failures. FUNDING: National Natural Science Foundation of China, State Key Laboratory Special Fund, and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund.

Humans

OmniExtract: an automatic data extraction tool based on large language model and prompt engineering.

Extracting structured information from documents or scientific papers is crucial for data sharing and retrieval. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in language understanding, and a number of LLM-based tools have been developed for extraction-oriented tasks. However, it's still difficult to find a universal and user-friendly tool for various practical extraction tasks. To address this challenge, we propose OmniExtract, an automatic data extraction tool with user-friendly configuration files that can adapt to various data extraction tasks. OmniExtract employs a prompt optimization method to refine task-specific prompts and achieve high extraction performance. It also supports comprehensive data extraction from both documents and tables, making it applicable to a broad range of data sources. Evaluation results show that OmniExtract obtains a high accuracy ~90% for three datasets. Furthermore, two additional data extraction applications of OmniExtract in real-world scenarios have been presented, achieving an accuracy of 92.21% and ~90% precision and recall, respectively. Specifically, OmniExtract can handle tabular files of various sizes and formats, and achieve over 99% precision and recall on table information extraction tasks. The data reliability performance shows that OmniExtract is a valuable tool for database updating. An online testing service is available at https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/omniextract/. The service can be deployed locally with the code in https://github.com/wyb39/OmniExtract.

Large Language Models

Artificial Intelligence Cannot Replace Peer Reviewers but May Help Editors Triage: A Comparative Analysis of a Large Language Model and Human Reviewer Recommendations at the American Journal of Sports Medicine.

BACKGROUND: The peer review system faces increasing strain from rising manuscript volumes, reviewer fatigue, and well-documented interreviewer disagreement. Large language models (LLMs) have shown potential to support the peer review process, but their ability to replicate editorial decisions at high-impact medical journals and their utility as manuscript screening tools remain unknown. PURPOSE: To compare the agreement between an LLM and the final editorial decision on manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Sports Medicine and to evaluate the potential of LLMs as a manuscript screening tool. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional agreement study. METHODS: Fifty-four manuscripts randomly selected from submissions to the American Journal of Sports Medicine (September 2024-October 2024) were reviewed by a locally deployed LLM (Ministral 3 14B; Mistral AI) using a standardized prompt. The artificial intelligence (AI) produced a categorical recommendation (reject, cascade, revision, or accept) and a numerical score (0-100) for each manuscript. Agreement with the final editorial decision was assessed by Cohen kappa (4-category model) for pooled human reviewers (n = 139 reviews) and the AI (n = 54). Screening performance was evaluated by positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS: Pooled human reviewers demonstrated fair agreement with the final decision (&#x3ba; = 0.181 [P < .001]; 42.4% agreement), while the AI demonstrated slight, nonsignificant agreement (&#x3ba; = 0.126 [P = .099]; 37.0% agreement). The AI recommended revision for 61.1% of manuscripts, of which 72.7% were ultimately rejected or cascaded, demonstrating systematic "revision bias." When the AI recommended rejection, 54.5% of those manuscripts were ultimately rejected and 27.3% were cascaded; when the AI recommended cascade, 50% were rejected and 50% were cascaded. However, when the AI recommended rejection or cascade (n = 21), 90.5% received a final decision of rejection or cascade (PPV, 90.5%; specificity, 81.8%). Manuscripts with an AI score <70 were rejected or cascaded 88.0% of the time (PPV, 88.0%). CONCLUSION: AI cannot replicate the nuanced judgment of human peer reviewers at a high-impact sports medicine journal. When AI recommended rejection or cascade, 90.5% of manuscripts received that final decision (descriptive PPV, 90.5%; 95% CI, 71.1%-97.3%), suggesting potential utility as an exploratory first-pass screening tool warranting further validation in larger cohorts. However, AI could not reliably distinguish manuscripts destined for outright rejection from those that would be cascaded to a sister journal-an important limitation for editorial triage applications.

Sports Medicine

Large Language Model and Knowledge Graph-Driven AJCC Staging of Prostate Cancer Using Pathology Reports.

Background/Objectives: To develop an automated American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for radical prostatectomy pathology reports using large language model-based information extraction and knowledge graph validation. Methods: Pathology reports from 152 radical prostatectomy patients were used. Five additional parameters (Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, metastasis stage (M-stage), extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and perineural invasion) were extracted using GPT-4.1 with zero-shot prompting. A knowledge graph was constructed to model pathological relationships and implement rule-based AJCC staging with consistency validation. Information extraction performance was evaluated using a local open-source large language model (LLM) (Mistral-Small-3.2-24B-Instruct) across 16 parameters. The LLM-extracted information was integrated into the knowledge graph for automated AJCC staging classification and data consistency validation. The developed system was further validated using pathology reports from 88 radical prostatectomy patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. Results: Information extraction achieved an accuracy of 0.973 and an F1-score of 0.986 on the internal dataset, and 0.938 and 0.968, respectively, on external validation. AJCC staging classification showed macro-averaged F1-scores of 0.930 and 0.833 for the internal and external datasets, respectively. Knowledge graph-based validation detected data inconsistencies in 5 of 150 cases (3.3%). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of automated AJCC staging through the integration of large language model information extraction and knowledge graph-based validation. The resulting system enables privacy-protected clinical decision support for cancer staging applications with extensibility to broader oncologic domains.

artificial intelligence

Automating candidate gene prioritization with large language models: from naive scoring to literature-grounded validation.

MOTIVATION: Identifying promising therapeutic targets from thousands of genes in transcriptomic studies remains a major bottleneck in biomedical research. While large language models (LLMs) show potential for gene prioritization, they suffer from hallucination and lack systematic validation against expert knowledge. RESULTS: The framework identified 609 sepsis-relevant genes with >94% filtering efficiency, demonstrating strong enrichment for inflammatory pathways including TNF-&#x3b1; signaling, complement activation, and interferon responses. Literature validation yielded 30 ultra-high confidence therapeutic candidates, including both established sepsis genes (IL10, TREM1, S100A9, NLRP3) and novel targets warranting investigation. Benchmark validation against expert-curated databases achieved 71.2% recall, with systematic correlation between computational confidence and evidence quality. The final candidate set balanced discovery (11 novel genes) with validation (19 known genes), maintaining biological coherence throughout the filtering process. This framework demonstrates that rigorous methodology can transform unreliable LLM outputs into systematically validated biological insights. By combining computational efficiency with literature grounding, the approach provides a practical tool for prioritizing experimental validation efforts. The modular design enables adaptation to other diseases through knowledge base substitution, offering a systematic approach to literature-guided biomarker discovery. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: We developed a two-stage computational framework that combines LLM-based screening with literature validation for systematic gene prioritization. Starting with 10&#xa0;824 genes from the BloodGen3 repertoire, we applied multi-criteria evaluation for sepsis relevance, followed by retrieval-augmented generation using 6346 curated sepsis publications. A novel faithfulness evaluation system verified that LLM predictions aligned with retrieved literature evidence. Source code and implementation details are available at https://github.com/taushifkhan/llm-geneprioritization-framework, vector database at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15802241, and Interactive demonstration at https://llm-geneprioritization.streamlit.app/.

Humans

PubMind: literature-based genetic variant extraction and functional annotation using large language models.

Biomedical literature contains extensive functional knowledge on genetic variants, but much remains inaccessible in unstructured text. Existing resources such as ClinVar and HGMD remain limited by coverage, submission bias, update frequency, and sparse annotation. We develop PubMind, an artificial intelligence (AI)&#xa0;framework that uses large language models (LLMs)&#xa0;to triage and extract variant-function-disease associations and supporting evidence from biomedical text. PubMind captures single-nucleotide, copy-number, structural, and gene-fusion variants, and normalizes records to genomic and transcriptomic coordinates. Benchmarking shows >90% accuracy for variant recognition and 99% precision for disease extraction. Applied to >41 million PubMed abstracts and >5 million full-text articles, PubMind generates PubMind-DB, a database of ~1.3 million unique variants with contextual annotations, accessible via web interface and API. Only ~10% of PubMind variants overlap with ClinVar, and >80% of them&#xa0;show concordant pathogenicity labels. PubMind transforms unstructured biomedical text into structured genomic knowledge, advancing variant interpretation for precision medicine.

Large Language Models