SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “metformin”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Metformin extended release: metformin gastric retention, metformin GR, metformin XR.

Metformin extended release [Glumetza, metformin hydrochloride, metformin gastric retention, metformin GR] is a proprietary once-a-day formulation of metformin hydrochloride under development with Depomed for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. In May 2002, Depomed licensed manufacturing and marketing rights for its proprietary formulation of metformin extended release (500mg dose) to Biovail Corporation for the US (including Puerto Rico) and Canada. Under the terms of the agreement, Biovail will pay DepoMed a 25 million dollars milestone fee upon approval of the 500mg dosage and also customary royalties on the net sales in the US and Canada. Biovail also agreed to acquire approximately 2.4 million of additionally issued Depomed shares for 12.3 million dollars. Biovail has subsequently developed a 1000mg dose of metformin extended release [metformin XR] using its proprietary Smartcoat delivery technology allowing a graduated release of the active drug from the tablet. In April 2004, Depomed and Biovail amended their original license agreement of May 2002. Under the terms of the amended agreement, Depomed will receive royalties on sales of Biovail's 1000mg tablet in the US and Canada. In turn, Biovail acquired access to Depomed's clinical data for the metformin 500mg tablet that will be used to accelerate regulatory filings for Biovail's 1000mg tablet and establish equivalence between the two dosages. Biovail is seeking marketing partners for metformin extended release (Glumetza) in the US. The company anticipates signing an agreement for the US during the second half of 2005. In Canada, Biovail Corporation will market Glumetzatrade mark through its Canadian division, Bioval Pharmaceuticals Canada. Depomed has an agreement with LG Life Sciences for the commercialisation and distribution of metformin extended release in Korea. Metformin GR is available for partnership in Europe and Asia. Biovail Corporation and Depomed announced in June 2005 that the US FDA has approved metformin extended release (Glumetza) 500mg and 1000mg tablets for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Biovail plans launching the product in the fourth quarter of 2005. In July 2005, Biovail paid Depomed a 25 million dollars milestone payment following approval of metformin extended release in the US for type 2 diabetes. In March 2005, Biovail Corporation and Depomed announced that they have received an approvable letter from the FDA for the once-daily, extended-release formulation of metformin extended release (Glumetza) 500mg and 1000mg tablets. The letter specified an issue related to finalising one manufacturing specification. There were no clinical labeling issues identified in the letter. Both companies filed a response to a specified issue at the FDA on 8 April 2005. The companies believed that the response will be classified as a Class I response with a 60-day review period. The 500mg dosage was developed by Depomed using its patented drug delivery GR technology, while Biovail developed metformin 1000mg dose using its proprietary Smartcoat delivery technology. Biovail's NDA for a once-daily, extended-release formulation of metformin HCl for the treatment of type II diabetes was filed in April 2004 and accepted for review in June 2004 by the FDA. Depomed completed two double-blind, pivotal, phase III clinical trials with metformin extended release 500mg at 60 sites in the US in more than 1000 patients with type 2 diabetes. In three different dosing regimens, metformin extended release significantly decreased the glycosylated haemoglobin level similarly to that of metformin immediate-release. Biovail successfully compared metformin extended release 1000mg dose with Depomed's 500mg dose in multiple equivalence studies. In these studies, metformin extended release was well tolerated and demonstrated an excellent safety profile in terms of gastrointestinal adverse events. On 1 June 2005, Depomed and Biovail Comporation, the licensee, announced that the Therapeutic Products Directorate in Canada issued a Notice of Compliance for metformin extended release (Glumetza) 500mg and 1000mg for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Biovail Pharmaceuticals Canada plans to launch the product in the fourth quarter of 2005. Biovail has submitted an application for metformin extended release with the Therapeutic Products Directorate in Canada. and received notification of acceptance for review in August 2004. Bristol-Myers Squibb is marketing a proprietary, once-daily extended-release formulation of metformin (Glucophage XR). Several companies are developing controlled-release and extended-release formulations of metformin.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed2004

Metformin extended release--DepoMed: metformin, metformin gastric retention, metformin GR.

Delayed-Action Preparations↗

PubMed2001

Lactic acidosis in metformin therapy: searching for a link with metformin in reports of 'metformin-associated lactic acidosis'.

OBJECTIVE: The link between metformin and lactic acidosis in metformin therapy may be causal, associated or coincidental. Our objective was to investigate this link by studying and analysing published reports of so-called 'metformin-associated lactic acidosis'. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: systematically searched in the BIOSIS, DERWENT, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PASCAL databases of the English language and non-English language literature for all reports of so-called 'metformin-associated lactic acidosis' published from May 1995 through January 2000. We did not include reports related to metformin overdose or contrast media-induced renal failure. Metformin accumulation and concurrent pathologies were critically reviewed as precipitating factors for metformin-associated lactic acidosis. Metformin accumulation was assessed in terms of the recorded measurement of metformin concentration in plasma or, if not available, by the presence of primary renal failure, i.e. renal failure that was not secondary to a shock syndrome. RESULTS: We found 21 reports describing a total of 26 patients. Criteria of lactic acidosis (lactate > 5 mmol/l, pH <or= 7.35) were not met in four patients. In the remaining 22 patients, plasma metformin concentration was determined in only four, of whom one had a normal value. In the 18 patients with lactic acidosis where plasma metformin concentration data was not available, the presence of primary renal failure was absent or unlikely in six patients, uncertain in two, and likely or proven in 14. With regard to these 14 patients, the precipitating factor was metformin in 12 patients (in the context of renal failure either chronic or acute) and intercurrent pathologies in two others. Overall, lactic acidosis was either absent (n = 4), precipitated by concurrent pathology (n = 8), precipitated by metformin without apparent associated pathology (n = 12) or of uncertain origin (n = 2). Death occurred 10 times but only once in the 12 patients with metformin-induced lactic acidosis and this was not related to metformin. CONCLUSIONS: While the term 'metformin-associated lactic acidosis' is commonly used to depict all situations of lactic acidosis in metformin therapy, true metformin-associated lactic acidosis, i.e. one which refers to metformin and concurrent pathologies as co-precipitating factors, was never observed in the studied reports. As there was no mortality due to metformin alone, it is important that physicians are familiar with the range of other risk factors that contribute to lactic acidosis in patients treated with metformin.

Acidosis, Lactic↗

PubMed2006

Metformin-glibenclamide versus metformin plus rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy.

AIM: This double-blind study evaluated the efficacy and safety of metformin-glibenclamide tablets vs. metformin plus rosiglitazone therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: After an open-label, metformin lead-in phase, 318 patients were randomly assigned to treatment based on metformin-glibenclamide 500/2.5 mg tablets (initial daily dose 1000/5 mg) or metformin 500 mg plus rosiglitazone 4 mg (initial daily dose 1000-2000 mg + 4 mg, depending on previous treatment) for 24 weeks. Doses were titrated to achieve the therapeutic glycaemic target. The primary efficacy variable was the change in HbA1C. RESULTS: At week 24, metformin-glibenclamide tablets resulted in significantly greater reductions in HbA1C (-1.5%) and fasting plasma glucose [-2.6 mmol/l (-46 mg/dl)] than metformin plus rosiglitazone [-1.1%, p < 0.001; -2 mmol/l (-36 mg/dl), p = 0.03]. More patients receiving metformin-glibenclamide attained HbA1C <7.0% than did those in the metformin plus rosiglitazone group (60 vs. 47%) and had fasting plasma glucose levels <7 mmol/l (<126 mg/dl) by week 24 (34 vs. 25%). Both treatments were well tolerated. Frequency of adverse gastrointestinal events was comparable between groups. Four per cent of patients receiving metformin-glibenclamide withdrew because of symptomatic hypoglycaemia contrasted with 3% of patients receiving metformin plus rosiglitazone who withdrew because of persistent hyperglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic events were mild or moderate in intensity and were easily self-managed. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin-glibenclamide tablets resulted in significantly greater reductions in HbA1C and fasting plasma glucose compared with metformin plus rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Risk of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Metformin is an oral anti-hyperglycemic agent used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The results of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study indicate that metformin treatment is associated with a reduction in total mortality compared to other anti-hyperglycemic treatments. Metformin, however, is thought to increase the risk of lactic acidosis, and is considered to be contraindicated in many chronic hypoxemic conditions that may be associated with lactic acidosis, such as cardiovascular, renal, hepatic and pulmonary disease, and advancing age. OBJECTIVES: To assess the incidence of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use compared to placebo and other glucose-lowering treatments in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A secondary objective was to evaluate the blood lactate levels for those on metformin treatment compared to placebo or non-metformin therapies. SEARCH STRATEGY: A search was performed of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (up to 4/2000), Medline (up to 11/2000), Embase (up to 11/2000), Oldmedline, and Reactions (up to 5/2000), in order to identify all studies of metformin treatment from 1966 to November 2000. The Cumulated Index Medicus was used to search relevant articles from 1959 to 1965. The search was augmented by scanning references of identified articles, and by contacting principal investigators. Date of latest search: November 2000. SELECTION CRITERIA: Prospective trials in patients with type 2 diabetes that lasted longer than one month were included if they evaluated metformin, alone or in combination with other treatments, compared to placebo or any other glucose-lowering therapy. Observational cohort studies of metformin treatment lasting greater than one month were also included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected trials to be included, assessed study quality and extracted data. The incidence of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis was recorded as cases per patient-years, for metformin treatment and for placebo or other treatments. The upper limit for the true incidence of cases in the metformin and non-metformin groups were calculated using Poisson statistics. In a second analysis lactate levels were measured as a net change from baseline or as mean treatment values (basal and stimulated by food or exercise) for treatment and comparison groups. The pooled results were recorded as a weighted mean difference (WMD) in mmol/L, using the fixed effects model for continuous data. MAIN RESULTS: Pooled data from 176 comparative trials and cohort studies revealed no cases of fatal or nonfatal lactic acidosis in 35,619 patient-years of metformin use or in 30,002 patients-years in the non-metformin group. Using Poisson statistics with 95% confidence intervals the upper limit for the true incidence of metformin-associated lactic acidosis was 8.4 cases per 100,000 patient-years, and the upper limit for the true incidence of lactic acidosis in the non-metformin group was 9 cases per 100,000 patient-years. There was no difference in lactate levels, either as mean treatment levels or as a net change from baseline, for metformin compared to placebo or other non-biguanide therapies. The mean lactate levels were slightly lower for metformin treatment compared to phenformin (WMD -0.75 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.86 to -0.15). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence from prospective comparative trials or from observational cohort studies that metformin is associated with an increased risk of lactic acidosis, or with increased levels of lactate, compared to other anti-hyperglycemic treatments if prescribed under the study conditions, taking into account contra-indications.

Acidosis, Lactic↗

PubMed2004

Gastrointestinal tolerability of extended-release metformin tablets compared to immediate-release metformin tablets: results of a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Metformin, a biguanide antihyperglycemic medication, lowers blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes with minimal risk of hypoglycemia. Most common side effects include diarrhea, nausea and vomiting. Extended-release metformin (Glucophage XR)*, a once-daily tablet using the patented GelShield Diffusion System release mechanism, may be better tolerated than immediate-release metformin (Glucophage). This retrospective chart review examined the overall gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability of both formulations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patient charts were reviewed and data were collected from October 2001 to May 2002. Adult patients with type 2 diabetes started on extended-release metformin (metformin-XR) or switched from immediate-release metformin to metformin-XR within the previous 2 years were eligible for inclusion in the metformin-XR cohort. Patients started on immediate-release metformin within the previous 2 years were eligible for inclusion in the immediate-release metformin cohort. Previous experience of GI side effects while taking immediate-release metformin did not prevent inclusion in either cohort, though patients with significant underlying GI disease or moderate to severe hepatic or renal impairment were excluded. GI tolerability was assessed during the first year of treatment with immediate-release metformin or metformin-XR. Primary endpoints were overall GI tolerability and frequency of diarrhea during the first year of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 471 patients' charts were reviewed and data were collected from four diabetes clinics; 310 (metformin-XR) and 158 (immediate-release metformin) eligible patients were included. Patients were, on average, 56 years old, and overweight (mean body mass index 33 kg/m2). The majority of patients were Caucasian (50%), Hispanic (24%) or Black (19%). Mean daily doses were 1258 mg (range 500-2500 mg) for metformin-XR and 1282 mg (range 500-2550 mg) for immediate-release metformin. About 25% of the metformin-XR cohort had been switched from immediate-release metformin due to a history of GI adverse events (AE). Despite this, the frequency of any GI AE was similar between metformin-XR and immediate release metformin (11.94 vs. 11.39%, p = 0.86). The incidence of individual GI AE also did not differ significantly between cohorts. In a cohort of 205 patients started on immediate-release metformin and switched to metformin-XR, the frequency of any GI AE was 26.34% (while taking immediate release metformin; n = 205) vs. 11.71% (after switching to metformin-XR; n = 205) (p = 0.0006) and the frequency of diarrhea was 18.05% (while taking immediate-release metformin) vs. 8.29% (after switching to metformin-XR) (p = 0.0084). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective chart review, patients switched from immediate-release metformin to metformin-XR experienced fewer GI side effects on comparable doses of the extended-release metformin.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1995

Role of metformin accumulation in metformin-associated lactic acidosis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of metformin accumulation in the pathophysiology of metformin-associated lactic acidosis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used high-performance liquid chromatography to measure plasma metformin concentrations in 14 patients who experienced lactic acidosis (pH < 7.35 and lactate concentration 5 > mmol/l) while receiving chronic metformin treatment. Their treatment was generally based on alkalinization and dialysis therapy. RESULTS: Clinical shock and/or evidence of tissue hypoxia was found in all patients with the exception of one who had a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced anuria. Ten patients had significant metformin accumulation (plasma metformin concentrations 4.1-84.9 mg/l, normal value 0.6 +/- 0.5 mg/l before drug intake), generally because of failure to withdraw metformin despite intercurrent pathological conditions affecting its renal elimination (serum creatinine concentrations ranging from 269 to 1,091 mumol/l). There was no metformin accumulation (plasma metformin 0.03-0.7 mg/l) in the four other patients, who had less severe renal failure (serum creatinine 140-349 mumol/l). The severity of the patient's general condition did not predict early hospital mortality (death before discharge from the intensive care unit) even in patients in shock. Whereas it was high in those without metformin accumulation (only 1 of 4 patients recovered), early hospital mortality was low in the 10 patients with metformin accumulation and was not related to its extent (3 patients died with end-stage hepatic failure or cardiac failure). Correlation studies showed a positive correlation between serum creatinine and plasma metformin and between plasma metformin and arterial lactate but, for the latter correlation, only in patients with metformin accumulation. CONCLUSION: Metformin-associated lactic acidosis is not necessarily due to metformin accumulation; true type B (aerobic) lactic acidosis, i.e., without an apparent associated hypoxic factor, seems exceptional. Neither the severity of the clinical picture nor the degree of metformin accumulation predicted survival; rather, the prognosis was dependent upon the severity of the associated pathological conditions.

Acidosis, Lactic↗

PubMed2002

Improved glycaemic control with metformin-glibenclamide combined tablet therapy (Glucovance) in Type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled on metformin.

AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of two dosage strengths of a single-tablet metformin-glibenclamide (glyburide) combination, compared with the respective monotherapies, in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) inadequately controlled by metformin monotherapy. METHODS: In this 16-week, double-blind, multicentre, parallel-group trial, 411 patients were randomized to receive metformin 500 mg, glibenclamide 5 mg, metformin-glibenclamide 500 mg/2.5 mg or metformin-glibenclamide 500 mg/5 mg, titrated with the intention to achieve fasting plasma glucose (FPG) < or = 7 mmol/l. RESULTS: Decreases in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and FPG were greater (P < 0.05) for metformin-glibenclamide 500 mg/2.5 mg (-1.20% and -2.62 mmol/l) and 500 mg/5 mg (-0.91% and -2.34 mmol/l), compared with metformin (-0.19% and -0.57 mmol/l) or glibenclamide (-0.33% and -0.73 mmol/l). HbA1c < 7% was achieved by 75% and 64% of patients receiving metformin-glibenclamide 500 mg/2.5 mg and 500 mg/5 mg, respectively, compared with 42% for glibenclamide and 38% for metformin (P = 0.001). These benefits were achieved at lower mean doses of metformin or glibenclamide with metformin-glibenclamide 500 mg/2.5 mg and 500 mg/5 mg (1225 mg/6.1 mg and 1170 mg/11.7 mg) than with glibenclamide (13.4 mg) or metformin (1660 mg). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in two patients receiving glibenclamide. Plasma lipid profiles were unaffected and mean changes in body weight were < or = 1.0 kg. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive management of Type 2 DM with a new metformin-glibenclamide combination tablet improved glycaemic control and facilitated the attainment of glycaemic targets at lower doses of metformin or glibenclamide compared with the respective monotherapies, without compromising tolerability.

Blood Glucose↗

PubMed1995

Efficacy of metformin in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Multicenter Metformin Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Sulfonylurea drugs have been the only oral therapy available for patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) in the United States. Recently, however, metformin has been approved for the treatment of NIDDM. METHODS: We performed two large, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, controlled studies in which metformin or another treatment was given for 29 weeks to moderately obese patients with NIDDM whose diabetes was inadequately controlled by diet (protocol 1: metformin vs. placebo; 289 patients), or diet plus glyburide (protocol 2: metformin and glyburide vs. metformin vs. glyburide; 632 patients). To determine efficacy we measured plasma glucose (while the patients were fasting and after the oral administration of glucose), lactate, lipids, insulin, and glycosylated hemoglobin before, during, and at the end of the study. RESULTS: In protocol 1, at the end of the study the 143 patients in the metformin group, as compared with the 146 patients in the placebo group, had lower mean (+/- SE) fasting plasma glucose concentrations (189 +/- 5 vs. 244 +/- 6 mg per deciliter [10.6 +/- 0.3 vs. 13.7 +/- 0.3 mmol per liter], P < 0.001) and glycosylated hemoglobin values (7.1 +/- 0.1 percent vs. 8.6 +/- 0.2 percent, P < 0.001). In protocol 2, the 213 patients given metformin and glyburide, as compared with the 210 patients treated with glyburide alone, had lower mean fasting plasma glucose concentrations (187 +/- 4 vs. 261 +/- 4 mg per deciliter [10.5 +/- 0.2 vs. 14.6 +/- 0.2 mmol per liter], P < 0.001) and glycosylated hemoglobin values (7.1 +/- 0.1 percent vs. 8.7 +/- 0.1 percent, P < 0.001). The effect of metformin alone was similar to that of glyburide alone. Eighteen percent of the patients given metformin and glyburide had symptoms compatible with hypoglycemia, as compared with 3 percent in the glyburide group and 2 percent in the metformin group. In both protocols the patients given metformin had statistically significant decreases in plasma total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations, whereas the values in the respective control groups did not change. There were no significant changes in fasting plasma lactate concentrations in any of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin monotherapy and combination therapy with metformin and sulfonylurea are well tolerated and improve glycemic control and lipid concentrations in patients with NIDDM whose diabetes is poorly controlled with diet or sulfonylurea therapy alone.

Blood Glucose↗

PubMed2003

Pioglitazone and metformin in obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome not optimally responsive to metformin.

BACKGROUND: In an observational study of 13 women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) not optimally responsive to metformin diet, we assessed the efficacy and safety of addition of pioglitazone. We also compared these 13 women to 26 women with PCOS, who were responsive to metformin diet, matched by age and by pre- treatment menstrual history and not different by obesity categories. METHODS: Prospectively, as outpatients, with diet constant [1500-2000 calorie (depending on entry body mass index), 26% protein, 44% carbohydrate, 30% fat], metformin (2.55 g/day) was given for 12 months to 39 women, 13 not optimally responsive, 26 responsive to metformin diet, followed by addition of pioglitazone (45 mg/day) for 10 months in the 13 non-responders. Outcome measures included changes in sex hormones, insulin, insulin resistance (IR), insulin secretion, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, weight, and menstrual status. RESULTS: In 13 non-responders, on metformin diet, median serum insulin fell (21 to 16 microIU/ml, P<0.05) and insulin secretion fell from 251 to 200 (P<0.01); weight, dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS), testosterone and IR were unchanged (P> or =0.07). Compared with 14% pre- treatment, on metformin diet, expected menses occurred 46% of the time at 3 months (P=0.05), 38% at 6 months (P=0.07), 27% at 9 months, and 24% at 12 months. In 26 responders, on metformin diet, median weight fell (93 to 87 kg), testosterone fell (50 to 32 ng/dl), insulin fell (26 to 16 microIU/ml), IR fell (5.32 to 3.45) and insulin secretion fell (351 to 271) (P< or =0.017 for all). The occurrence of expected menses in the 26 responders was 2.5-fold higher than in the 13 non-responders (P<0.0001). In 11 non-responders, on pioglitazone + metformin diet over 10 months versus antecedent metformin diet, DHEAS fell (211 to 171 microg/dl, P=0.02), insulin fell (16 to 10 microIU/ml, P= 0.001), IR fell (3.37 to 1.73, P=0.002), insulin secretion fell (217 to 124, P=0.004), sex hormone-binding globulin rose (31 to 43 nmol/l, P=0.006), and HDL cholesterol rose (38 to 42 mg/dl, P=0.003). On pioglitazone + metformin diet, the occurrence of expected menses was 2-fold higher than on metformin diet (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In women with PCOS who failed to respond optimally to metformin, when pioglitazone was added, insulin, glucose, IR, insulin secretion, and DHEAS fell, HDL cholesterol and sex hormone-binding globulin rose, and menstrual regularity improved, without adverse side-effects.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1989

Hemodialysis in the treatment of lactic acidosis in diabetics treated by metformin: a study of metformin elimination.

The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics of metformin elimination by dialysis. For this purpose we report the kinetic parameters during dialysis and the metformin clearance (i.e. dialysance) in four patients presenting with lactic acidosis which occurred on metformin therapy. We also studied metformin elimination in two chronically hemodialyzed diabetic patients inadvertently maintained on metformin therapy and in two chronically hemodialyzed non-diabetic patients who took a single dose of metformin before a dialysis session. Analysis of plasma concentration-time curves showed a biphasic pattern of metformin - elimination, according to a two-compartment model. We demonstrate that metformin may be removed even after reaching an equilibrium between blood and dialysate levels in a recirculating system, suggesting a storage of metformin in a deep compartment with a gradient of concentration between this compartment and the blood. Lastly, metformin dialysance appears satisfactory (68 ml/min) even in the case of relatively low blood flow; this value reached 170 ml/min under good hemodynamic conditions. In conclusion, hemodialysis efficiently removes metformin and corrects metabolic acidosis in patients with metformin-induced lactic acidosis.

Acidosis, Lactic↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Long-term therapy with addition of pioglitazone to metformin compared with the addition of gliclazide to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, comparative study.

BACKGROUND: This 52-week, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of metformin plus pioglitazone with the established combination of metformin plus gliclazide in type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c > or = 7.5% to < or =11.0%) received either pioglitazone 15 mg o.d. (titrated up to 45 mg; n = 317) or gliclazide 80 mg o.d. (titrated up to 320 mg; n = 313) and metformin at the pre-study dose. HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), insulin, lipids and the urinary albumin/creatinine ratio were measured. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in HbA1c (1% decrease in both groups) and FPG between groups. There was a decrease in fasting insulin in the pioglitazone group compared to an increase in the gliclazide group (p < 0.001). There were significantly greater improvements in triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol in the metformin plus pioglitazone group compared to the metformin plus gliclazide group (p < 0.001). Mean LDL-cholesterol decreased with metformin plus gliclazide and increased with metformin plus pioglitazone (p < 0.001); however, this increase was considerably less marked than that in HDL-cholesterol. The mean urinary albumin/creatinine ratio was reduced by 10% in the metformin plus pioglitazone group compared to an increase of 6% in the metformin plus gliclazide group (p = 0.027). The incidence of adverse events was comparable between groups and both combinations were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the established combination of metformin plus gliclazide, this study indicates potential benefits of addition of pioglitazone to metformin in terms of improvements in microalbuminuria and specific abnormalities associated with diabetic dyslipidemia.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2↗

PubMed2006

Reductions in biomarkers of cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes with rosiglitazone added to metformin compared with dose escalation of metformin: an EMPIRE trial sub-study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of rosiglitazone added to metformin with dose escalation of metformin on cardiovascular risk biomarkers in type 2 diabetes mellitus. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Cardiovascular biomarkers were assessed in a sub-population of 122 subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (mean age 54.6 and 56.0 years, BMI 34.7 and 32.1 kg/m2; for the rosiglitazone plus metformin and metformin groups, respectively) from the multicenter (63 centers in the USA), double-blind, randomized parallel-group Escalation of Metformin theraPy vs. Initiation of Rosiglitazone Early (EMPIRE) study. Treatment group sizes were slightly imbalanced owing to central, rather than local, randomization. Subjects receiving metformin 1000 mg/day at baseline were randomized to rosiglitazone 4 mg/day plus metformin 1000 mg/day (RSG + MET) or metformin 1500 mg/day (up-titrated MET) for 24 weeks. At 8-weeks, rosiglitazone was increased to 8 mg/day in RSG + MET recipients and metformin to 2000 mg/day in up-titrated MET recipients. RESULTS: Reductions from baseline in HbA1c at week 24 (mean +/- SD) occurred in both groups (RSG + MET: -0.61% +/- 1.16%; up-titrated MET: -0.65% +/- 1.18%). Post-prandial glucose levels (AUC(0-3h)) decreased with RSG + MET (-3.5 mmol/L.h; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.2 to -1.8) and up-titrated MET (-1.3 mmol/L.h; 95% CI: -3.8 to 1.1). Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA)-estimated insulin sensitivity increased by 37.7% (95% CI: 22.8 to 54.5) in RSG + MET and 6.9% (95% CI: -6.2 to 21.9) in up-titrated MET recipients. RSG + MET reduced C-reactive protein (CRP; -23.9%; 95% CI: -40.4 to -2.8), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) activity (-30.1%; 95% CI: -44.5 to -11.9), PAI-1 antigen (-15.5%; 95% CI: -28.3 to -0.3) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9; -13.8%; 95% CI: -25.1 to -0.9), but increased tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha; 27.0%; 95% CI: 6.8 to 50.9). Corresponding values for up-titrated MET were CRP -9.3% (95% CI: -36.9 to 30.2), PAI-1 activity -7.2% (95% CI: -28.2 to 20.0), PAI-1 antigen -1.5% (95% CI: -17.4 to 17.5), MMP-9 29.0% (95% CI: -1.3 to 68.6) and TNF-alpha -6.0% (95% CI: -22.0 to 13.2). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that rosiglitazone plus metformin has positive cardiovascular effects against a background of similar glycemic improvements.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Improvements in glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients switched from sulfonylurea coadministered with metformin to glyburide-metformin tablets.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the change in hemoglobin A1C (A1C) in patients with type 2 diabetes switched from coadministration of a sulfonylurea (SU), glyburide or glipizide, and metformin (SU+Met) to a single glyburide-metformin tablet. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study design of patients with type 2 diabetes treated at 3 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers and 1 Department of Defense Medical Center was utilized. One hundred percent of patients receiving glyburide-metformin tablets were screened for inclusion. Patients with at least 6 months of prior SU+Met combination therapy and a baseline A1C measured within 35 days prior to or 3 days after switch to glyburide-metformin tablets were included. At least one documented follow-up A1C at >or=90 days after the switch to glyburide-metformin was required for inclusion. Glycemic control, complications, lipid parameters, concomitant medications, and weight were analyzed prior to and following the switch to glyburide-metformin. RESULTS: Seventy-two patient records were included after the disqualification criteria excluded 488 prospective patients. The mean age of the 72 patients was 62 years; average body mass index was 32.9 kg/m2, average baseline A1C was 8.3%, and the average time since diagnosis was 7.6 years. The mean reduction in A1C was 0.6% (P=0.002) at a mean follow-up of 196 days after the switch to glyburide-metformin tablets. Improvement in glycemic control was predominantly seen in patients with a baseline A1C >or=8% in whom a 1.3% mean reduction in A1C (P=0.0002) was achieved despite a lower mean final dose of glyburide. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that in type 2 diabetic patients with an A1C >or=8%, switching from coadministration of a sulfonylurea plus metformin to combination glyburide-metformin tablets may provide an improvement in glycemic control in the range of a 1.2 to 1.4 absolute percentage point decrease in A1C. A randomized, prospective trial comparing these 2 methods of treatment is needed, however, to determine the precise effect provided by the unique formulation of glyburide in the glyburide-metformin tablet.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1999

Lactic acidosis in metformin-treated patients. Prognostic value of arterial lactate levels and plasma metformin concentrations.

OBJECTIVE: The antidiabetic drug metformin has been associated in a small number of patients with lactic acidosis, a serious condition with a poor prognosis. However, because of lack of data, the prognostic significance of hyperlactataemia in metformin-treated patients is not known. METHODS: Data were collected from 49 metformin-treated patients with lactic acidosis (arterial lactate level > or = 5 mmol/L and blood pH < or = 7.35) and available plasma metformin concentration data to investigate the association of arterial lactate levels and plasma metformin concentrations with mortality. RESULTS: The overall mortality rate in this patients sample was 45% and the median arterial lactate level was 13.1 mmol/L. Median lactate levels were similar in patients who survived (13 mmol/L) and those who died (14.3 mmol/L), whereas the median plasma metformin concentration was 3 times higher in patients who survived (20.6 mg/L versus 6.3 mg/L). CONCLUSION: In this, the largest series of metformin-treated patients with lactic acidosis yet reported, 55% of patients survived and these patients had a median arterial lactate level of 13.1 mmol/L. Neither arterial lactate levels nor plasma metformin concentrations were of prognostic significance in relation to mortality in this sample of metformin-treated patients with lactic acidosis. Death in these patients appeared instead to be associated with other hypoxic disease or underlying ill health. These observations suggest that accumulation of metformin may not be as significant with respect to high arterial levels of lactate and their effects as has been traditionally thought.

Acidosis, Lactic↗

PubMed2005

Long-term effects on lipids and lipoproteins of pioglitazone versus gliclazide addition to metformin and pioglitazone versus metformin addition to sulphonylurea in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to determine the long-term effects of pioglitazone add-on to metformin or sulphonylurea on plasma lipids and lipoproteins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The effects of pioglitazone were studied in two clinical trials in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c > or =7.5 and < or =11%). In the first trial, patients currently receiving metformin were randomised to pioglitazone (15-45 mg/day, n=317) or gliclazide (80-320 mg/day, n=313) add-on therapy. In the second study, pioglitazone (15-45 mg/day, n=319) or metformin (850-2,550 mg/day, n=320) was added to sulphonylurea therapy. Patients were force-titrated to the maximum tolerated dose of add-on therapy, which was maintained to the 2-year endpoint. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with respect to HbA1c reduction from baseline to week 104. Whether added to metformin or sulphonylurea, pioglitazone caused highly significant greater decreases in triglycerides and increases in HDL cholesterol from baseline to week 104 than treatments with gliclazide or metformin add-on therapies (p< or =0.001). The triglyceride reductions noted with pioglitazone were maintained over time, with decreases of 16-18% at 1 year and 17-23% at 2 years. In the pioglitazone groups, the improvement in HDL cholesterol at 1 year was maintained, with 21-22% augmentations at 2 years (p<0.001 between-group difference). Small but statistically significant greater reductions in LDL cholesterol were observed with gliclazide vs pioglitazone add-on to metformin and metformin vs pioglitazone add-on to sulphonylurea (p<0.001 for between-group difference). In the pioglitazone groups, mean LDL cholesterol at 2 years was similar to mean baseline LDL cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: After 2 years, highly significant decreases in triglycerides and increases in HDL cholesterol that were sustained over time or even improved were observed when pioglitazone was added to metformin or sulphonylurea therapy. These effects of pioglitazone on lipids may be potentially beneficial in reducing cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Metformin-pioglitazone and metformin-rosiglitazone effects on non-conventional cardiovascular risk factors plasma level in type 2 diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Metformin is considered the gold standard for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy and in combination with sulphonylureas and insulin. The combination of metformin with thiazolidinediones is less well studied. The aim of the present study was to assess the differential effect, and tolerability, of metformin combined with pioglitazone or rosiglitazone on glucose, coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome. METHODS: This 12-month, multicentre, double-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial was conducted at three study sites in Italy. We assessed patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (duration >or=6 months) and with metabolic syndrome. All patients were required to have poor glycaemic control with diet, or experienced adverse effects with diet and metformin, administered up to the maximum tolerated dose. Patients were randomized to receive either pioglitazone or rosiglitazone self-administered for 12 months. We assessed body mass index (BMI), glycaemic control [glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), fasting and postprandial plasma glucose and insulin levels (FPG, PPG, FPI, and PPI respectively), homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index], lipid profile [total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides (TG)], lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] and homocysteine (HCT) at baseline and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of treatment. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: No BMI change was observed at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months in either group. Significant HbA(1c) decreases were observed at 9 and 12 months in both groups. After 9 and 12 months, mean FPG and PPG levels decreased in both groups. Decreases in FPI and PPI were observed at 9 and 12 months compared with the baseline in both groups. Furthermore, in both groups, the HOMA index improved but only at 12 months. Significant TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, TG improvement was present in the pioglitazone group at 12 months compared with the baseline values, and these variations were significantly different between groups. No TC, LDL-C, TG improvement was present in the rosiglitazone group after 12 months. Significant Lp(a) and HCT improvement was present in the pioglitazone group at 12 months compared with the baseline values, and Lp(a) change was significant compared with the rosiglitazone group. Significant HCT decrease was observed in the rosiglitazone group at the end of the study. In our type 2 diabetic patients, both drugs were safe and effective for glycaemic control and improving HCT plasma levels. However, long-term treatment with metformin plus pioglitazone significantly reduced Lp(a) plasma levels, whereas metformin + rosiglitazone did not. CONCLUSION: For patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome, combined treatment with metformin and rosiglitazone or pioglitazone is safe and effective, However, the pioglitazone combination also reduced the plasma Lp(a) levels whereas the rosiglitazone combination did not.

Blood Glucose↗

PubMed1990

Type 2 diabetes in the elderly: an assessment of metformin (metformin in the elderly).

Metformin efficacy and safety in type 2 diabetes has not been studied in the elderly patient under conditions pertaining to clinical practice. We have therefore, studied prospectively over two months 24 patients aged between 70-88 years with 115% mean ideal body wt and glycemic control greater than 10 mol.l-1 fasting and/or greater than 14 mol.l-1 postprandial, and/or an HbA1 value greater than 10%. At entry into the study, patients were on metformin + sulfonylurea (n = 15), sulfonylurea (n = 3), metformin (n = 2), insulin (n = 1) or diet alone (n = 3). They received metformin as the sole therapy when possible (sulfonylureas were discontinued in 9 cases) at a dosage of either 850 mg or 1,700 mg/day dependent on creatinine clearance values of 30-60 ml.min-1 (n = 11) and greater than 60 ml.min-1 (n = 13), respectively. Compared to pretreatment values, glycemic control at 1 and 2 months were unchanged, with metformin blood levels remaining within expected values for both dosage groups. Blood lactate levels remained unchanged in the high dosage group but were reduced (p less than 0.05) on 850 mg/day probably because of the reduction of metformin dosage in patients already treated prior to the study. It is concluded that provided the dosage is adjusted to renal function, the metabolic tolerance of metformin therapy is satisfactory in the elderly type 2 diabetic patient. With regard to efficacy, longer observations are needed to know whether this therapy may offer on a long-term basis equivalent glycemic control compared to other treatment modalities.

Aged↗