SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “multimodal artificial intelligence”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Automated CEAP Classification of Venous Duplex Reports Using Multimodal Artificial Intelligence.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and internally validate a prototype multimodal artificial intelligence system for automated CEAP (Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical and Pathophysiological) classification of venous duplex ultrasound (VDUS) reports, integrating natural language processing of free-text components with computer vision analysis of hand-drawn anatomical diagrams. METHODS: Single centre retrospective observational study using routinely collected clinical data. One thousand consecutive venous duplex ultrasound reports from Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK (July 2024 - May 2025) were labelled according to the CEAP classification, excluding the Etiological component, which could not be reliably determined from duplex reports alone. Transfer learning was applied using ClinicalBERT for text and MobileNetV3 for diagrammatic data. Clinical classes were predicted from request line text. Text- and image-based pathophysiological models were developed for four anatomical territories (Great Saphenous Vein, Small Saphenous Vein, Deep system, Perforators), combined using late fusion with probability averaging. RESULTS: The clinical CEAP model achieved accuracy of 0.91, macro-F1 of 0.82, and macro-AUC of 0.98. Pathophysiological prediction varied, with text models broadly outperforming image models. Fusion yielded heterogeneous benefits, improving SSV performance but reducing Deep system accuracy. The performance of the final pathophysiological CEAP fusion models varied across anatomical territories: accuracy ranged from 0.70-0.92 and macro-AUC from 0.80-0.92. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of automated CEAP classification from VDUS reports. Despite class imbalance affecting minority class predictions, the strong discriminatory performance validates this multimodal ML model for extracting clinically meaningful information from real-world data. This approach offers potential, pending external validation, to streamline vascular services through automated triage and guideline-compliant decision making.

Artificial intelligence↗

PubMed2026

Enterocutaneous Fistula-Associated Sepsis and Mortality: Development and Validation of a Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Prediction Model.

BACKGROUND: Predicting enterocutaneous fistula (ECF)-associated sepsis and mortality poses significant challenges in digital health care due to the disease's complexity and heterogeneous clinical manifestations. Current approaches that rely on single-modal data or traditional scoring systems often fail to capture the intricate immune-inflammatory dynamics and multisystem involvement in patients with ECF. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven multimodal fusion model integrating clinical, imaging, and transcriptomic data for early prediction of ECF-associated sepsis and 28-day mortality, addressing the limitations of conventional single-dimensional models. METHODS: This study leveraged publicly available datasets (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III [MIMIC-III], electronic Intensive Care Unit [eICU], and The Cancer Genome Atlas) to construct a multimodal framework. Clinical parameters were processed using Extreme Gradient Boosting, abdominal imaging features were extracted via convolutional neural networks, and transcriptomic profiles were analyzed with variational autoencoders. A Transformer-based fusion network was employed for joint prediction and validated through cross-validation and external testing. Key features were identified using Shapley Additive Explanations and Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations interpretability algorithms, while immune regulatory mechanisms were explored via weighted gene co-expression network analysis. RESULTS: The multimodal model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89 for predicting sepsis and 28-day mortality, outperforming unimodal models (clinical-only model, AUC 0.72, and imaging-only model, AUC 0.78). Critical predictors included Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, lactate levels, intra-abdominal free fluid on imaging, and immunoregulatory genes (programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-L1] and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 [IDO1]). Mechanistic analysis revealed distinct immune reprogramming in patients with sepsis, characterized by increased regulatory T cells and M2 macrophages, along with downregulated cluster of differentiation 8+ (CD8+) T cells. CONCLUSIONS: This multimodal AI model offers an innovative digital solution in medical informatics, enabling precise early risk stratification for ECF-associated sepsis. By integrating multisource data and providing interpretable insights into immune-inflammatory pathways, the model enhances health care quality for patients with ECF and paves the way for personalized intervention strategies.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Multimodal artificial intelligence and machine learning in oncology: from data integration to precision cancer care.

Cancer remains a major global health burden, with approximately 20 million new cases and 9.7 million cancer-related deaths reported globally in 2022. While advances in radiological imaging, molecular profiling, and clinical data have enhanced the interpretation of disease progression, the availability of multiple such modalities still does not meet the needs of a large patient population. This narrative review focuses on the role of multimodal artificial intelligence and machine learning in bridging the gap in interpreting heterogeneous modalities to improve risk prediction, prognostic assessment, and treatment decision-making in precision oncology. Multimodal frameworks such as Pathomic Fusion illustrate how complementary histopathological and genomic information can be integrated for cancer diagnosis and prognostic modeling. Multimodal models have demonstrated potential in virtual biopsy, cancer screening, prognostic prediction, radiotherapy planning, intraoperative guidance, and clinical-trial design using digital twins and synthetic control arms. The major limitations of incorporating multimodal artificial intelligence and machine learning in oncology include data heterogeneity, demographic or institutional biases, and reproducibility challenges that hinder translation. Accordingly, appropriate data-governance strategies, fairness audits, and privacy-preserving approaches such as federated learning should be considered where appropriate. Future progress will depend on the development of standardized benchmarking datasets, robust external validation, seamless integration with electronic health records and picture archiving and communication systems, and the implementation of explainable, secure, and clinically validated multimodal artificial intelligence frameworks that support precision oncology in routine clinical practice.

deep learning↗

PubMed2026

Artificial Intelligence for Colorectal Surgeons-Part II: Research Applications, Challenges in Adoption, and Practical Resources.

BACKGROUND: This is part II of a 2-part series examining artificial intelligence in colorectal surgery. Part I established foundational concepts and clinical applications. Implementation, however, requires understanding research methodologies, available resources, and the specific challenges currently limiting widespread adoption. These topics are the focus of part II. OBJECTIVE: To examine artificial intelligence's transformation of surgical research, provide practical implementation resources, address adoption challenges, and explore future directions in colorectal surgery. METHODS: Comprehensive literature review focusing on artificial intelligence research methodology, implementation barriers, educational resources, and emerging technologies relevant to colorectal surgeons. RESULTS: Artificial intelligence streamlines clinical trial design through predictive modeling and natural language processing, reducing enrollment challenges that contribute to failed or inadequate trial accrual. Machine learning enables heterogeneity analysis within clinical trials, identifying treatment-responsive subgroups. Foundation models unlock analysis of unstructured electronic health record data at scale. Professional societies and universities offer specialized artificial intelligence education programs, with open-access data sets facilitating research participation. However, implementation faces multifaceted challenges: technical infrastructure demands, with real-time processing requiring dedicated graphics processing unit clusters; regulatory frameworks struggling with continuously evolving algorithms; undefined liability distribution for artificial intelligence-assisted decisions; algorithmic bias risking health care disparities; and the "black box" problem limiting clinical trust. Economic barriers include substantial initial costs without clear reimbursement pathways. Future directions include multimodal artificial intelligence integrating imaging, genomics, and histopathology; cognitive robotic systems with real-time decision support; digital twin technology for patient-specific surgical simulation; and global surgical artificial intelligence networks enabling distributed learning across institutions. CONCLUSIONS: Although artificial intelligence offers transformative potential for colorectal surgery research and practice, successful implementation requires addressing technical, regulatory, ethical, and economic challenges. The surgeon's evolving role demands both traditional expertise and computational fluency. Future advances in multimodal integration, autonomous systems, and global collaboration will fundamentally reshape surgical practice but will require thoughtful implementation prioritizing patient benefit and clinical value.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Integrating Radiogenomics and CSF-Based Liquid Biopsy Sequencing for Precision Neuro-Oncology.

Glioblastoma and diffuse gliomas pose major therapeutic challenges due to marked intratumoral heterogeneity, limited tissue accessibility, and the blood-brain barrier. Tissue-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) remains essential for WHO CNS5 molecular classification, yet it is invasive and poorly suited to serial monitoring. Two complementary non- or minimally invasive approaches have advanced rapidly: radiogenomics, which correlates multiparametric MRI features with genomic alterations, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) liquid biopsy sequencing, which detects circulating tumor DNA with high tissue concordance. This review examines the independent progress and synergistic integration of radiogenomics and CSF-NGS. Imaging signatures can non-invasively predict key drivers (IDH1/2, EGFR, TERT, PTEN, TP53) and molecular subtypes, while CSF-ctDNA sequencing enables real-time assessment of clonal evolution, therapy resistance (including post-temozolomide hypermutation), and residual disease. We discuss technical considerations, performance metrics, multimodal artificial-intelligence fusion, and emerging clinical applications for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment selection, and longitudinal surveillance. Critical challenges, standardization, prospective validation, and workflow integration are highlighted. By combining the spatial phenotypic information of radiogenomics with the temporal genomic resolution of CSF sequencing, this multimodal strategy offers a promising path toward precision neuro-oncology and reduced reliance on repeated invasive sampling.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Deep learning-based multimodal pathogenomics integration for precision cancer prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have revealed valuable prognostic insights in haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained histological sections and transcriptomic profiles, suggesting potential applications in machine learning. However, existing methods lack sufficient intra- and inter-modal interactions, and face challenges in clinical validation due to incomplete multimodal data. METHODS: We proposed PathoGems (PathoGenomics-based integrative survival prediction), a weakly-supervised, interpretable multimodal learning framework that integrates histology and genomic profiles for precise cancer prognosis prediction. To evaluate the robustness of PathoGems, we initially curated a dataset of 1965 cases across four cohorts from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), including breast, colorectal, glioblastoma, and esophageal cancers. For external validation, PathoGems was further evaluated on four independent cohorts, consisting of 76 breast cancer and 41 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cases from Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, as well as 102 colorectal cancer and 58 glioblastoma cases from the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC). RESULTS: PathoGems effectively stratified patients into favorable and unfavorable risk groups, revealing significant differences in histological patterns, genomic features, and overall survival (log-rank test, p < 0.05). Moreover, the model’s predictions are further supported by visualization and transcriptomic analysis, enhancing interpretability and reliability. CONCLUSIONS: By fusing histological and clinicogenomic multimodal models, PathoGems will provide a solid foundation for developing an innovative tool that aids clinicians in making informed decisions and selection personalized treatment strategies for cancer patients.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Diagnosing the undiagnosed: AI-enhanced multimodal modeling for placental mesenchymal dysplasia in high-risk pregnancies.

Placental mesenchymal dysplasia (PMD) is a rare vascular placental disorder that mimics molar pregnancy but often coexists with a viable fetus, making its misdiagnosis potentially devastating. In high-risk pregnancies, artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced multimodal modeling - incorporating imaging, genomics, proteomics, and clinical features - offers a transformative diagnostic strategy. Leveraging Bayesian hyperparameter optimization for model refinement, this approach improves diagnostic accuracy while reducing uncertainty and clinician hesitation. Recent clinical studies support its efficacy and interpretability through SHAP and LIME models, while real-time surgical enhancements using Bayesian methods highlight its broader clinical utility. Despite current challenges such as data heterogeneity and integration barriers, multimodal AI provides unprecedented resolution in placental analysis, enabling precise differentiation between PMD and similar fetopathies. Ultimately, this advancement supports timely, non-invasive diagnosis, personalized management, and emotionally informed decision-making aligned with ethical AI implementation standards.

Bayesian optimization↗

PubMed2026

Artificial intelligence agents and agentic artificial intelligence applied to precision medicine.

Precision medicine seeks to individualise care by integrating multimodal biomedical data, yet most deployed clinical artificial intelligence (AI) remains assistive, providing predictions without managing workflows or adapting autonomously. Agentic AI, built on large language models (LLMs), has emerged as a paradigm characterised by autonomy, goal-directed reasoning, memory, planning and tool use. This review synthesises evidence on agentic AI and LLMs applied to precision medicine, encompassing drug discovery, genomics, oncology, rare disease diagnostics and clinical pharmacology. This review also examines architectural components, recent validation milestones and emerging challenges, including hallucination, sociodemographic bias and evolving regulatory frameworks across the FDA, the EU AI Act and the WHO.

agentic AI↗

PubMed2026

The role of Epstein-Barr virus in NK/T cell lymphoproliferative disorders: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic strategies.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a widely prevalent lymphotropic γ-herpesvirus, with approximately 95% of the population showing evidence of infection at some point during their lifetime. While most infections are asymptomatic or follow a self-limiting clinical course, in certain populations, EBV can lead to a range of lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs), particularly subtypes originating from T cells and natural killer (NK) cells, which are often characterized by highly aggressive disease progression. This review aims to systematically discuss the molecular basis of EBV infection, covering its viral biological properties, regulation of the latent and lytic cycles, key viral protein functions (e.g., LMP1, LMP2A, EBNA1), miRNA regulatory mechanisms, and the activation of various host signaling pathways (such as NF-κB, PI3K-AKT, JAK-STAT) that contribute to the maintenance of latent infection, cell transformation, and immune evasion. Additionally, the review focuses on the pathogenic contributions of these mechanisms in EBV-related T/NK cell lymphoproliferative diseases. Research highlights include the in-depth analysis of virus-host genome interaction mechanisms, the identification of novel molecular biomarkers, and the development of targeted therapeutic strategies (e.g., PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors, EBV-specific T cell therapy). Through this comprehensive review, it is hoped that personalized medicine and artificial intelligence-assisted multimodal decision-making will be applied to the precise prevention and treatment of EBV-related diseases.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors and the breast cancer immune ecosystem: immune remodeling, resistance, and therapeutic reprogramming.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6 inhibitors) combined with endocrine therapy have become a therapeutic backbone for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer, yet durable disease control is frequently limited by intrinsic and acquired resistance. Canonical tumor-cell mechanisms, including retinoblastoma-pathway escape, cyclin E-cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) activation, endocrine adaptation, and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-AKT-mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling, explain only part of this failure because they do not fully capture dynamic immune and stromal remodeling. Preclinical and translational studies indicate that early CDK4/6 inhibition can enhance antigen presentation, activate interferon-related programs, restrain regulatory T cells, and promote a T-cell-inflamed state. These effects are conditional and may not persist during prolonged treatment. Sustained therapy can instead drive heterogeneous resistant niches characterized by stromal remodeling, myeloid recruitment, checkpoint adaptation, and T-cell dysfunction. This immune-state dependence provides a rationale for immune checkpoint blockade, although clinical combinations have shown mixed efficacy and clinically relevant hepatic, pulmonary, and hematologic toxicities. Sequential or lead-in strategies therefore warrant prospective evaluation. Oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and redox adaptation may sustain selected resistant states and expose context-dependent ferroptotic vulnerabilities. Ferroptosis may connect tumor-cell killing with immune regulation, whereas nanomedicine may improve tumor-selective delivery. Both strategies remain largely preclinical and require further evaluation of pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, toxicity, manufacturability, and immune-cell safety. This Review distinguishes intrinsic from acquired resistance across interpatient, intratumoral, spatial, and temporal dimensions. It integrates tumor-cell escape with cytokine, immune, stromal, vascular, and metabolic remodeling and summarizes emerging therapeutic strategies. We further propose a candidate biomarker-informed framework that integrates genomic profiling, spatial immune architecture, circulating biomarkers, T-cell receptor (TCR) dynamics, transcriptomic and single-cell analyses, artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted multimodal integration, and longitudinal sampling. This framework is intended to support biomarker development and prospective trial design rather than current clinical decision-making, providing a translational basis for testing state-informed and sequence-aware therapeutic strategies.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Beyond predictive performance: A systematic review and critical methodological appraisal of AI/ML and conventional modelling strategies in breast, colorectal, and pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Predictive modelling for cancer risk, treatment-related complications, and survival is central to precision oncology. Conventional logistic regression (LR) and Cox proportional hazards (CoxPH) regression remain widely used but are limited when modelling nonlinear interactions, high-dimensional imaging features, and multimodal clinical-metabolic predictors. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods offer expanded capability through automated feature extraction, ensemble learning, and flexible survival modelling, but the evidence on when AI/ML adds value over conventional models across cancer sites and predictive tasks remains fragmented. OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the methodological performance, validation strategies, and translational limitations of AI/ML models compared with conventional statistical models in published predictive-modelling studies for breast, colorectal, or pancreatic cancer. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies published between January 2019 and March 2025. Two reviewers independently conducted title-and-abstract screening, full-text eligibility assessment, and PROBAST risk-of-bias assessment. Sixty-five studies (n = 907,567 participants) were narratively synthesised by cancer site, predictive task, model family, comparator, validation strategy, predictor modality, and calibration or explainability reporting. RESULTS: The 65 studies comprised breast cancer (n = 35), colorectal cancer (n = 21), and pancreatic cancer (n = 9). AI/ML superiority over LR and CoxPH was task- and data-dependent. CNN- and U-Net-based models predominated in imaging and body-composition tasks, tree-based ensembles consistently outperformed LR for tabular perioperative complication prediction, and CoxPH remained competitive, and in the largest pancreatic risk study, superior to XGBoost (C-index 0.802 vs 0.723) in well-structured datasets. PROBAST analysis-domain risk was moderate in 54 of 65 studies (83%), driven by limited external validation, sparse calibration reporting (11/65), and few decision-curve analyses (7/65). CONCLUSION: AI/ML adds the most methodological value in imaging-derived feature extraction and nonlinear perioperative prediction, while conventional regression remains preferable in large, structured datasets with linear predictors. Clinical translation requires standardised body-composition definitions, external validation, calibration assessment, decision-curve analysis, and explainability, in line with TRIPOD+AI and CLAIM standards.

Humans↗

PubMed2024

Bridging the Gap From Proteomics Technology to Clinical Application: Highlights From the 68th Benzon Foundation Symposium.

The 68th Benzon Foundation Symposium brought together leading experts to explore the integration of mass spectrometry-based proteomics and artificial intelligence to revolutionize personalized medicine. This report highlights key discussions on recent technological advances in mass spectrometry-based proteomics, including improvements in sensitivity, throughput, and data analysis. Particular emphasis was placed on plasma proteomics and its potential for biomarker discovery across various diseases. The symposium addressed critical challenges in translating proteomic discoveries to clinical practice, including standardization, regulatory considerations, and the need for robust "business cases" to motivate adoption. Promising applications were presented in areas such as cancer diagnostics, neurodegenerative diseases, and cardiovascular health. The integration of proteomics with other omics technologies and imaging methods was explored, showcasing the power of multimodal approaches in understanding complex biological systems. Artificial intelligence emerged as a crucial tool for the acquisition of large-scale proteomic datasets, extracting meaningful insights, and enhancing clinical decision-making. By fostering dialog between academic researchers, industry leaders in proteomics technology, and clinicians, the symposium illuminated potential pathways for proteomics to transform personalized medicine, advancing the cause of more precise diagnostics and targeted therapies.

Proteomics↗

PubMed2026

Cancer of unknown primary: the evolution of tissue of origin identification in the artificial intelligence era.

Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) presents substantial diagnostic and therapeutic challenges owing to its heterogeneous nature and the absence of an identifiable primary tumor site. This review provides a structured search of the pathogenesis, epidemiological characteristics, and limitations of traditional diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for CUP, with an emphasis on the evolution of Tissue of Origin (TOO) identification techniques. Recent advances in precision medicine have accelerated the development of machine learning-based TOO identification tools, representing a paradigm shift in CUP diagnostics. Deep learning (DL) algorithms that integrate multi-omics data (such as genomics and transcriptomics) with clinical features have markedly enhanced the accuracy of tracing tumor origin, and artificial intelligence (AI) driven TOO models are increasingly being incorporated into clinical practice, offering new insights for pathological diagnosis, treatment selection, and prognostic evaluation. Nevertheless, several challenges remain, including issues of data standardization, model generalizability, and interpretability. Ethical considerations related to data privacy, algorithmic fairness, and clinical implementation also warrant careful attention. Future research should focus on establishing standardized multi-center databases, developing more interpretable AI models, and fostering multidisciplinary collaborative strategies for CUP management. Through continued refinement of technical solutions and regulatory guidelines, TOO identification is anticipated to progress from research to routine clinical application, ultimately supporting precise and personalized care for patients with CUP.

Artificial intelligence↗

PubMed2026

Big data in multiple sclerosis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes recent key advancements in multiple sclerosis (MS) achieved through the utilization of big data from diverse sources and advanced analytical techniques. RECENT FINDINGS: Real-world evidence (RWE) derived from MS big data has significantly enhanced treatment strategies, redefined the concept of disease progression, refined prognostic models, and facilitated personalized medicine. RWE has highlighted the long-term benefits of early intensive treatment compared to escalation strategies, the unfavorable risk profile associated with treatment de-escalation and the importance of managing treatments during pregnancy. Additionally, it has revealed similarities and differences in the effectiveness and safety of specific high-efficacy therapies, as well as key predictors for switching treatments. RWE has also emphasized the central role of progression independent of relapse activity as a significant driver of disability and predictor of unfavorable long-term outcomes in both adult and pediatric onset MS. A data-driven approach utilizing artificial intelligence and big data has established a comprehensive framework for understanding the disease's evolution. Multimodal big data frameworks - encompassing clinical data, MRI, genomics, biomarkers, and app-based metrics - have demonstrated their ability to enhance diagnostic performance and risk stratification in MS. SUMMARY: Big data approaches are transforming MS research and clinical practice by providing stronger RWE to guide therapeutic decision-making, refining models of disease progression, and developing more precise prognostic tools.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

AI-Based 3D Heterogeneous Network Model for Functional Prediction of Epigenetics.

Human biology and diseases are the result of constantly evolving processes within an intricately complex molecular network of interactions, such as epigenetic regulation. Epigenetics refers to heritable changes in gene expression that occur without alterations to the underlying DNA sequence. These changes, driven by mechanisms such as DNA methylation, histone modifications, and noncoding RNAs, play critical roles in regulating chromatin structure and gene activity. Epigenetic regulation offers valuable insights into biological systems, and when integrated with sophisticated analyses, it enables us to gain insights into gene regulation and cellular behavior. Here, we describe an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model that is capable of generating 3-dimensional (3D) heterogeneous network by integrating multimodal data for the functional prediction of epigenetic mechanisms, emphasizing its applications in medicine, developmental biology, and personalized therapeutics. Heterogeneous networks in biology are powerful tools for understanding the complex interactions and interdependencies within biological systems. Key advancements in AI and multiomics data integration have propelled this field, offering new insights into disease mechanisms, biomarker discovery, and therapeutic interventions.

Epigenesis, Genetic↗

PubMed2026

AI-driven diagnostic and prognostic models for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: insights from clinical, imaging, and multi-omics studies-a scoping review.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), formerly known as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is the most common chronic liver disease around the world, affecting 33.6% of the adult population (95% CI: 28.1%-39.5%; I 2 = 99.9%), or roughly one in three. The extent of the liver damage is variable, from simple steatosis to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH, formerly NASH), cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Early diagnosis is essential to prevent serious liver damage. Traditional diagnostic techniques such as liver biopsy, imaging, and biomarker testing are all invasive, costly, reduced sensitive to early-stage disease, and they also have variability among observers. Modern diagnostic and prognostic approaches based on the principles of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and specifically on machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have enabled multimodal approaches integrating clinical, imaging and molecular data. This scoping review conducted per PRISMA-ScR guidelines, synthesizes findings from 73 studies (search window 2020-2026) across three dimensions: clinical data driven models, imaging-based classifiers (ultrasound, CT and MRI), and multi-omics (genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics) techniques. Moreover, emergence of models such as U-Net and LiverNet 2.x, classification models like DeepLiverNet and BiLSTM models, as well as transformer frameworks and the identification of biomarkers models are also described. This study also investigates challenges such as data heterogeneity, data interpretability, fairness and real-world clinical application. Finally, important areas of research opportunities and future directions are highlighted to present a developing clinically applicable, explainable and ethical AI solutions to manage MASLD.

MASLD↗

PubMed2025

Generative AI Models in Time-Varying Biomedical Data: Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Trajectory modeling is a long-standing challenge in the application of computational methods to health care. In the age of big data, traditional statistical and machine learning methods do not achieve satisfactory results as they often fail to capture the complex underlying distributions of multimodal health data and long-term dependencies throughout medical histories. Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence (AI) have provided powerful tools to represent complex distributions and patterns with minimal underlying assumptions, with major impact in fields such as finance and environmental sciences, prompting researchers to apply these methods for disease modeling in health care. OBJECTIVE: While AI methods have proven powerful, their application in clinical practice remains limited due to their highly complex nature. The proliferation of AI algorithms also poses a significant challenge for nondevelopers to track and incorporate these advances into clinical research and application. In this paper, we introduce basic concepts in generative AI and discuss current algorithms and how they can be applied to health care for practitioners with little background in computer science. METHODS: We surveyed peer-reviewed papers on generative AI models with specific applications to time-series health data. Our search included single- and multimodal generative AI models that operated over structured and unstructured data, physiological waveforms, medical imaging, and multi-omics data. We introduce current generative AI methods, review their applications, and discuss their limitations and future directions in each data modality. RESULTS: We followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines and reviewed 155 articles on generative AI applications to time-series health care data across modalities. Furthermore, we offer a systematic framework for clinicians to easily identify suitable AI methods for their data and task at hand. CONCLUSIONS: We reviewed and critiqued existing applications of generative AI to time-series health data with the aim of bridging the gap between computational methods and clinical application. We also identified the shortcomings of existing approaches and highlighted recent advances in generative AI that represent promising directions for health care modeling.

Artificial Intelligence↗

PubMed2026

Applications of quantum AI in brain disorder diagnosis: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Brain disorder diagnosis and prediction remain challenging because neuroimaging, electrophysiological, behavioral, and multimodal data are high-dimensional, noisy, heterogeneous, and limited by small clinical cohorts. This systematic review synthesised applications of quantum artificial intelligence (QAI) for brain disorder diagnosis, prediction, detection, and monitoring. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, studies published from 2016 to 13 January 2026 were retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore. After screening, 36 studies met the eligibility criteria and were qualitatively analysed according to disorder category, data modality, QAI method, implementation setting, validation strategy, and performance. RESULTS: At the broader disease-group level, neurodegenerative disorders were the most frequently investigated, followed by mental health and psychiatric disorders. At the individual level, Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia were the leading applications, followed by depression, anxiety, Alzheimer's disease, and stress-related tasks. MRI-based modalities were the most frequently used data source, followed by multimodal data and EEG. Methodologically, primary QAI approaches were dominated by quantum neural and QDL architectures, followed by quantum-inspired optimization or feature-selection methods and quantum-kernel/conventional QML classifiers. Qiskit/IBM Quantum and PennyLane were the most frequently reported quantum software frameworks. However, most studies relied on simulators, classical quantum-inspired implementations, or unclear implementation settings, with limited real-hardware evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: QAI shows emerging potential for brain disorder analysis, particularly through hybrid quantum-classical learning, quantum neural architectures, quantum-kernel methods, and quantum-inspired optimization. Nevertheless, current evidence remains preliminary and requires larger datasets, subject-level and external validation, fair classical benchmarking, noise-resilient circuits, real quantum hardware evaluation, explainability, and clinical validation.

Humans↗