SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “neoadjuvant therapy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Genomic, transcriptomic, and molecular predictors of response to neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a narrative review.

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has emerged as a key treatment paradigm for locally advanced rectal cancer, reducing distant metastasis rates and facilitating organ preservation in selected patients. However, treatment response remains heterogeneous, highlighting the need for biomarkers that can guide treatment selection and optimise outcomes. This narrative review synthesises the current evidence regarding tumour-intrinsic genomic biomarkers associated with response to neoadjuvant therapy, encompassing somatic mutations, germline polymorphisms, gene expression profiles, mismatch repair (MMR) status, protein expression, epigenetic markers, and circulating tumour-derived biomarkers across conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and TNT paradigms. Across the reviewed literature, individual somatic mutations, including KRAS, TP53, and BRAF, demonstrated limited reproducibility as predictive biomarkers, although KRAS mutations were recurrently associated with lower pathological complete response (pCR) rates in CRT-era cohorts. Germline polymorphisms in DNA repair (XRCC1) and folate metabolism (MTHFR) genes showed inconsistent associations with treatment response. In contrast, transcriptomic biomarkers demonstrated greater biological coherence, with proliferative, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and metabolic signatures frequently associated with treatment resistance, while multi-gene classifiers generally outperformed single-gene markers. Among currently available tumour-intrinsic biomarkers, MMR deficiency was the most consistently reported biomarker associated with reduced response to fluoropyrimidine-based regimens, including TNT, although TNT-specific evidence remains comparatively limited. Dynamic circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) monitoring, particularly ctDNA clearance during or after therapy, was consistently associated with pathological response and long-term oncologic outcomes across reviewed studies, whereas baseline ctDNA levels showed limited predictive value. Overall, the reviewed literature suggests that biomarker research in rectal cancer has evolved from single-gene analyses towards pathway-level and dynamic biomarkers. The integration of transcriptomic signatures, MMR status, and dynamic ctDNA monitoring may represent a promising strategy for personalising neoadjuvant therapy, improving patient selection for organ-preserving approaches, and enhancing oncologic outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer. Nevertheless, the evidence base remains heterogeneous, and further prospective validation, assay standardisation, and evaluation within contemporary TNT cohorts are required before these biomarkers can be routinely incorporated into clinical decision-making.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Multimodal features and prognostic risk assessment in locally advanced gastric cancer patients following neoadjuvant therapy based on machine learning algorithms: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is recommended for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC), but some patients respond poorly. We aimed to construct a multimodal model integrating CT images, transcriptomic sequencing, and clinicopathological data to assess prognosis in LAGC patients receiving NAT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter study included 505 LAGC patients who underwent NAT. Radiomic features were extracted from preoperative CT images of 505 patients. RNA-seq was performed on 277 post-NAT specimens, with additional data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases (n = 804). Patients were divided into training (168 cases), internal validation (72 cases), and external validation cohorts. Machine learning algorithms identified key radiomic, molecular, and clinical features associated with NAT response, which were then integrated into a multimodal model to predict overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Six radiomic and three molecular features significantly associated with NAT response were selected. Radiomic risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.0, P < 0.001) and molecular risk (HR: 7.1, P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors. By integrating radiomic risk, molecular risk, and clinical characteristics, a multimodal model (MuMo) was constructed.The C-index results (OS, C-index = 0.855; DFS, C-index = 0.786) demonstrated that MuMo outperformed the single-modality models and ypTNM staging.Mechanistic analysis suggested that the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy was significantly enriched in immune-inflammatory pathways. CONCLUSIONS: MuMo can effectively predict postoperative survival risk in LAGC patients receiving NAT, serving as a powerful tool for optimizing prognostic assessment.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Integrating clinical and genomic features to predict response to neoadjuvant therapy in microsatellite-stable rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has shifted rectal cancer management toward organ preservation. However, achieving a complete response (CR) for "watch-and-wait" strategies is hindered by high response heterogeneity. Although immunotherapy-combined NAT has expanded the candidate pools, the predictive significance of molecular alterations remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate clinical and genomic profiles of rectal cancer patients undergoing NAT to identify response predictors and to develop a nomogram for estimating CR probability. DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center cohort study. METHODS: This study included 437 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between December 2019 and March 2023. Patients underwent paired tumor and germline genomic sequencing (887-gene panel) before NAT. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed to identify clinical and genetic risk factors associated with tumor response and long-term survival. RESULTS: Of the 437 patients, 96.6% had microsatellite-stable (MSS) tumors. In the MSS locally advanced rectal cancer cohort (N = 307), the CR rate was 35.5%. Multivariate analysis identified immunotherapy-combined NAT (iTNT) (OR 4.41, 95% CI: 2.42-8.27), SYNE1 mutation (OR 2.12, 95% CI: 1.06-4.26), negative mesorectal fascia (MRF) status (OR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.17-0.66), and lower tumor location (OR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.27-0.84) as independent predictors of CR. KRAS mutation was the sole independent predictor of reduced disease-free survival (DFS; HR 1.93, 95% CI: (1.11-3.36), p = 0.020). KRAS G12D subtype was associated with the worst 2-year distant metastasis-free survival (71.3%) and exhibited a distinct predilection for lung metastasis. The clinical-genomic nomogram yielded strong discrimination (AUC = 0.705) and calibration, with favorable DCA net benefit. CONCLUSION: Clinical and genomic features jointly determine outcomes in MSS rectal cancer. SYNE1 mutation serves as a novel biomarker for CR, while KRAS mutations, especially the G12D subtype, identify patients at high risk for systemic relapse. The clinical-genomic nomogram facilitates individualized selection for organ-preservation strategies.

biomarker↗

PubMed2026

Outcomes of Response-Based Watch-and-Wait and Surgical Management After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BackgroundTotal neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) increases clinical complete response rates in locally advanced rectal cancer (RC), allowing response-based management strategies such as watch-and-wait (WW) as an alternative to total mesorectal excision (TME). Outcomes associated with WW after TNT remain incompletely defined. This study aimed to compare oncologic and organ-preservation outcomes between WW and surgical management following TNT.MethodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central up to April 2025. Observational studies comparing WW and TME following TNT were included. Pooled odds ratios (ORs), hazard ratios (HRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. Secondary outcomes included tumor regrowth, salvage surgery, and permanent stoma. Risk of bias was evaluated using ROBINS-I.ResultsSix studies comprising 793 patients were analyzed. WW showed no significant difference compared with TME regarding local recurrence (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.07-26.17; I2 = 80%), distant metastases (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.29-1.33; I2 = 49%), 5-year disease-free survival (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.71-1.31; I2 = 51.7%), or overall survival (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.81-1.30; I2 = 27.9%). Permanent stoma rates were lower with WW (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.01-1.23; I2 = 71%), becoming significant after sensitivity analysis (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01-0.19).ConclusionWW after TNT offers oncologic outcomes comparable to TME, with high organ preservation and reduced surgical morbidity in highly selected patients.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

HIF1A+CSF3R+ neutrophils-dominated hypoxic niche induced metabolic reprogramming for neoadjuvant therapy resistance in NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the frequently occurring cancers characterized by molecular heterogeneity and multiple immune cell infiltration patterns, which are associated with treatment sensitivity and resistance. However, the specific microenvironmental cells and their mechanisms that lead to treatment resistance in patients need to be explored in greater depth. METHODS: On the basis of patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy in our center, a multicenter, multicohort NSCLC spatial transcriptome, single-cell transcriptome, T-cell receptor repertoire sequencing, bulk RNA transcriptome, phosphorylated proteome, genome mutation, and clinical data were included for a comprehensive assessment of the therapeutic and prognostic impact of HIF1A+ CSF3R+ neutrophils in NSCLC. In vitro experiments validated the functional phenotype of HIF1A+ CSF3R+ neutrophils and co-localization interactions with other cellular subpopulations. Gradient boosting machine (GBM) constructed region of interest (ROI) models for evaluation. Computer-aided drug design (CADD) was used to predict targeted small molecule drugs, and in vivo mouse models were constructed to assess the effectiveness of the combination treatment regimen. RESULTS: Centered on HIF1A+ CSF3R+ neutrophils, recruited exhausted T cells and stromal cells form a hypoxic niche within the tumor region, which was enriched in non-response patients. ROI composed of these specific cellular subpopulations, associated with senescence and glycolysis, accurately predicting NSCLC progression, prognosis, and microenvironment composition. CADD analysis identified that platycodin-D2 specifically targeted CSF3R, reducing HIF1A expression and inhibiting neutrophil activity. Combining navitoclax, platycodin-D2 with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) significantly suppressed tumor proliferation and improved the immunosuppressive microenvironment. CONCLUSION: Our study emphasized the role of HIF1A+ CSF3R+ neutrophils in immunotherapeutic resistance of NSCLC, constructed a microenvironmental immune dysregulation network in a hypoxic ecological niche with HIF1A+ CSF3R+ neutrophils as the center. Platycodin-D2 specifically targeted HIF1A+ CSF3R+ neutrophils, enhancing the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy in NSCLC.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Resectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: From Retrospective Studies to Randomized Evidence.

Complete resection remains the only potentially curative treatment for localized intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), yet postoperative recurrence is common, particularly in patients with high-risk disease. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy may permit earlier control of occult micrometastatic disease, optimize the delivery of systemic treatment, and provide an in vivo assessment of tumor biology prior to major hepatectomy. These potential benefits must be balanced against treatment-related toxicity, surgical delay, and the risk of disease progression precluding resection. Early evidence was primarily derived from retrospective studies, which yielded inconsistent survival outcomes and exhibited substantial vulnerability to confounding and treatment-selection bias. The single-arm NEO-GAP trial subsequently demonstrated the feasibility of administering neoadjuvant gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel followed by surgical resection. More recently, the randomized phase II-III ZSAB-neoGOLP trial showed that neoadjuvant gemcitabine-oxaliplatin, lenvatinib, and toripalimab followed by surgery prolonged median event-free survival compared with upfront surgery (median: 18.0 vs. 8.7 months) without substantially compromising surgical feasibility. However, the interim overall survival analysis was inconclusive, and the generalizability of these findings beyond selected, medically fit patients treated at Chinese centers remains uncertain. This narrative review critically appraises the evolving evidence, discusses patient selection and perioperative treatment, and identifies priorities for future research. Current evidence supports the selective consideration of neoadjuvant therapy in medically fit patients with technically resectable but oncologically high-risk iCCA, rather than its routine use in all resectable cases.

GOLP↗

PubMed2026

Surgical Management of Young Women with High-Risk Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy on the I-SPY2 Trial.

BACKGROUND: Mastectomy rates in women with breast cancer are higher in younger women than in older women. The impact of this more extensive surgery on overall survival (OS) and locoregional recurrence in younger women is unknown, especially after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). This study evaluated surgical management and outcomes of patients aged ≤ 45 versus > 45 years enrolled in multicenter NST clinical trial, I-SPY2.0 (NCT01042379, PMID 37325931). METHODS: We conducted a secondary data analysis comparing locoregional treatment in patients aged ≤ 45 versus > 45 years with clinical or molecular high-risk clinical stage II-III breast cancer treated from April 2010 to June 2022. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate associations between type of breast surgery with OS and locoregional recurrence-free interval by age group and tumor receptor subtype. RESULTS: Of 1737 patients, 698 (40.2%) were aged ≤ 45 years. There were no significant differences in patient or tumor characteristics or residual cancer burden distribution between age groups. Although breast-conserving surgery was significantly less common in younger women (36.8% vs 48.5%, p < 0.001), surgery type was not associated with OS or locoregional recurrence-free interval for patients aged ≤ 45 years. CONCLUSIONS: Greater extent of breast surgery was not associated with improved outcomes in women aged ≤ 45 years. Choice of surgical procedure in the management of breast cancer is multifactorial, but young age alone does not warrant mastectomy following NST.

Breast cancer↗

PubMed2026

HER2DX genomic assay in HER2-positive early breast cancer treated with trastuzumab and pertuzumab: A correlative analysis from a real-world cohort.

BACKGROUND: HER2DX genomic assay is a genomic tool developed for personalizing care in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer. This real-world analysis examines its associations with pathological complete response (pCR) and invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) following trastuzumab- and pertuzumab-based neoadjuvant therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, observational, single-center study of 156 patients with stage I-III HER2-positive breast cancer treated with dual HER2 blockade-based neoadjuvant therapy between February 2015 and May 2022 at University Hospital A Coruña. HER2DX and clinicopathological variables were assessed in pretreatment tumor biopsies. Statistical analyses included Fisher's exact test, logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models, and Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: HER2DX was performed in 111 tumors (71.2%). Overall pCR rate was 51.3%. Hormone receptor-positive disease was significantly associated with lower pCR (odds ratio [OR] 0.25, 95% CI 0.11-0.50; p < 0.001), whereas HER2 immunohistochemistry 3+ showed a non-significant trend toward higher pCR (OR 2.95, 95% CI 0.96-11.08; p = 0.075). Median IDFS was not reached, but hormone receptor-positive tumors showed better outcomes (hazard ratio [HR] 3.67, 95% CI 1.02-13.32; p = 0.004 by log-rank). The association between HER2DX pCR score and pCR appeared heterogeneous. The continuous score was significantly associated with pCR in univariable analysis, not in multivariable model. In contrast, medium-high HER2DX pCR category showed significantly higher pCR rates than low category (OR 4.83, 95% CI 1.72-14.65; p = 0.004). The continuous HER2DX risk score was independently associated with IDFS (HR 2.84, 95% CI 1.24-6.48; p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, HER2DX scores were associated with pCR and IDFS, supporting previous evidence and highlighting potential role in treatment stratification.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Longitudinal ctDNA tracking in early and recurrent breast cancer using an ultrasensitive structural variant-based assay: an extended analysis from the TRACER study.

BACKGROUND: Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) following curative-intent therapy is prognostic of disease recurrence in early-stage breast cancer (EBC). An ultrasensitive structural variant (SV)-based ctDNA assay was evaluated previously in a 100-patient EBC cohort treated with neoadjuvant therapy, demonstrating high sensitivity, specificity, and a long lead-time to relapse. The stability of primary tumor-specific SVs at and after metastatic recurrence and their utility for longer-term ctDNA monitoring had not been established. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An updated retrospective analysis of ctDNA dynamics was conducted in an expanded cohort of 121 patients with EBC treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Plasma samples were collected at key clinical timepoints and serially in several patients who experienced metastatic recurrence. Clinical variables were abstracted from medical records. Associations between ctDNA detection, dynamics, and clinical outcomes were evaluated in the early-stage and metastatic settings. RESULTS: Thirty of 121 patients experienced clinical recurrence (28 distant, 2 local) over a median follow-up of 4.2 years (range 0.5-8.8; 25 ctDNA evaluable with adjuvant timepoints). All patients with detectable ctDNA in the adjuvant setting developed metastatic recurrence (22/22). Median lead time from ctDNA detection to metastatic recurrence was 346 days (range 0-1937). Among recurrent cases, 79% of primary tumor-specific SVs (n = 17 patients, tumor fraction ≥0.1%) remained detectable in plasma [range 7% (1/14 SV)-100% (15/15); median: 92%]. ctDNA dynamics in the recurrent metastatic setting demonstrated a strong relationship with radiographic outcomes in evaluable patients (n = 9). CONCLUSION: This SV-based digital PCR assay provided ultrasensitive ctDNA detection in an expanded EBC cohort, maintaining 100% positive predictive value for metastatic recurrence. In patients with recurrence, ctDNA dynamics were concordant with radiographic outcomes. Prospective studies evaluating the clinical utility of longitudinal ctDNA monitoring are warranted.

MRD↗

PubMed2026

ASO Visual Abstract: Surgical Management of Young Women with High-Risk Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in the I-SPY2 Trial.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Treatment of localized rectal cancer in the Nordic countries-comparison of Nordic to Dutch, ESMO, and NCCN guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer treatment in Nordic countries has traditionally differed, especially regarding neoadjuvant treatment. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the current rectal cancer guidelines in the Nordics and compare these to international guidelines. METHODS: Oncologists and colorectal surgeons from the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden) and the Netherlands were invited to participate in this narrative review. Two consensus meetings were held to agree on the content. All authors provided recommendations from their national guidelines. In addition, recommendations from the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) and from the US National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines were extracted. RESULTS: Several differences between the included guidelines were identified. The radiological "sigmoid take-off" definition for the upper margin of the rectum has been adapted in Denmark and the Netherlands, whereas the other guidelines rely on distance from the anal verge on rigid sigmoidoscopy. Indications for direct surgery vary considerably, where the NCCN guidelines recommend more aggressive neoadjuvant treatment, primarily total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), the Nordic and European guidelines open for direct surgery more often, and reserve especially TNT for high-risk cases. European countries more often recommend short-course radiotherapy, whereas NCCN maintains chemoradiotherapy as the mainstay. Whereas intentional and opportunistic organ preservation is an established part of the Dutch, NCCN, and ESMO guidelines, its use is mostly restricted to clinical trials in the Nordics. The Nordics and the Netherlands are restrictive in terms of adjuvant treatment, which is frequently recommended in ESMO and NCCN. Whereas neoadjuvant immunotherapy is recommended for mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) rectal cancer in NCCN, this use is off-label in Europe and not routinely recommended. CONCLUSION: Although all guidelines rely on the same evidence, there are considerable differences, especially in the indications and type of oncologic treatment, both in the neoadjuvant and in the adjuvant setting.

Rectal Neoplasms↗

PubMed2026

Molecular evaluation of residual disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer CALGB 40603 (Alliance).

BACKGROUNDDespite therapeutic advances in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), residual disease (RD) following neoadjuvant therapy remains a key predictor of a worse prognosis and obstacle to improving patient outcomes.METHODSTo better characterize RD and identify survival-associated features, we performed comprehensive transcriptomic profiling of 340 pretreatment stage II/III TNBCs and 70 matched posttreatment RD samples from the randomized CALGB 40603 (Alliance) phase II clinical trial. To explore preclinical treatment strategies for RD, patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse models mimicking RD were treated with antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs).RESULTSOur study shows prognostic genomic features measured pretreatment may differ from prognostic features measured posttreatment from RD specimens. Patients with a genomic PAM50 subtype of basal-like in RD specimens had a poor survival outcome, and their matching pretreatment tumors were characterized by elevated chromosomal amplifications of oncogenic drivers and significantly reduced B and T cell expression features. Paired analyses of basal-like RD and matched pretreatment tumors revealed further lymphocyte depletion in RD, along with lower expression of MHC class I and interferon signaling, indicating an immune-cold RD microenvironment. Treatment of a basal-like and conventional chemotherapy-resistant PDX model, resembling basal-like RD, with sacituzumab govitecan or trastuzumab deruxtecan produced a marked antitumor response.CONCLUSIONRD biology differs from pretreatment tumors, with basal-like subtype RD following neoadjuvant chemotherapy being immune cold and associated with poor survival. Preclinical modeling suggests this high-risk group may benefit from adjuvant ADC therapy.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT00861705.FUNDINGNIH NCI U10CA180821 (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology), NCI U24CA176171 (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology), NCI UG1CA233373 (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology), NCI Breast SPORE program P50-CA058223; Susan G. Komen SAC-160074; Breast Cancer Research Foundation BCRF-23-127; NIH NCI R01-CA229409; UNC LCCC Triple Negative Breast Cancer Center.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Oncotype DX: Clinical Utility, Evidence, and Future Trends in Personalized Breast Cancer Management.

The Oncotype DX assay has revolutionized the management of early-stage, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Developed in 2004, it quantifies 21 genes to generate a recurrence score that predicts distant recurrence risk and guides adjuvant chemotherapy. Multiple studies have validated its reliability and clinical utility in enabling more precise risk stratification and individualized treatment planning, thereby minimizing unnecessary chemotherapy exposure and improving patient outcomes. Leading oncology organizations such as the American Society of Clinical Oncology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network have incorporated it into their clinical guidelines. Beyond its well-established role in adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making, Oncotype DX is increasingly being investigated in broader clinical contexts, including lymph node-positive breast cancer, neoadjuvant therapy, radiotherapy, and ductal carcinoma in situ. Ongoing research and technological advancements, such as artificial intelligence-based predictive models and novel biomarker identification, hold significant promise for further enhancing its predictive accuracy and expanding its applications. This review synthesizes current evidence supporting the clinical utility of Oncotype DX, discusses evolving applications, and highlights future directions for integrating this genomic tool into precision oncology practice.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Clinicopathological response and survival outcomes of HER2-low versus HER2-zero early breast Cancer: A systematic review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor in women. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a key biomarker for classification and treatment. A subgroup with HER2-low expression has been identified, but existing evidence is heterogeneous. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared pathological response and survival outcomes between HER2-low and HER2-zero early-stage breast cancer to clarify prognostic features. METHODS: This study followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251120506). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and major oncology conferences were searched through September 2025. Cohort studies of early-stage breast cancer comparing HER2-low (IHC 1+/2+ and ISH-negative) vs. HER2-zero with extractable pCR, DFS, or OS data were included. Studies involving HER2-positive patients or inconsistent definitions were excluded. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies involving 115,182 patients were included. HER2-low patients showed significantly lower pCR rates (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.52-0.65). DFS favored HER2-low (multivariate HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.69-0.83), especially in HR+ tumors, with a weaker effect in HR- cases. OS also favored HER2-low (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.72-0.89), mainly driven by the HR- subgroup; no OS difference was seen in HR+ tumors. Sensitivity analyses and funnel plots indicated robust results with no apparent publication bias. Overall study quality was high (17 high-quality, 11 moderate-quality). CONCLUSION: HER2-low early breast cancer shows lower pCR after neoadjuvant therapy but better long-term survival. These findings support the clinical relevance of HER2-low as a biologically meaningful subgroup within HER2-negative disease, while its status as a stable and independent subtype still requires further validation through prospective studies, standardized testing, and multi-omics investigation.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Molecular Residual Disease and Recurrence in Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Upfront Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic utility of postoperative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for recurrence and treatment response in patients with rectal cancer undergoing upfront surgery. BACKGROUND: ctDNA-based molecular residual disease (MRD) testing shows promise in colorectal cancer, but its role in patients with rectal cancer not receiving neoadjuvant therapy is unclear. This study evaluates whether postoperative ctDNA predicts disease-free survival (DFS) and guides adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) decisions. METHODS: We analyzed ctDNA from patients with stage II to III rectal cancer (N=250) enrolled in the GALAXY study, a multicenter registry in Japan. A clinically validated, personalized, tumor-informed 16-plex PCR next-generation sequencing assay (Signatera) was used to detect and quantify ctDNA. The primary outcome was DFS, defined as the time from landmark to recurrence, death, or the latest radiologic assessment. RESULTS: In the MRD window (2-10 wk postsurgery, before ACT), 14.2% (35/246) of patients were ctDNA-positive and had significantly shorter DFS (HR: 9.96, 95% CI: 5.76-17.2, P <0.0001). Among patients who were ctDNA-positive in the MRD window, a significant benefit from ACT was observed (HR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.09-0.89, P =0.031), whereas no benefit was seen in ctDNA-negative patients (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.26-1.35, P =0.211). When analyzing ctDNA dynamics from the MRD window to 6 months postsurgery, recurrence risk was higher in patients who converted from ctDNA-negative to positive (HR: 8.22, 95% CI: 1.86-36.32, P =0.0055) and who remained ctDNA-positive (HR: 45.48, 95% CI: 14.31-144.57, P <0.0001) compared with serially ctDNA-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative ctDNA status is a robust biomarker predicting recurrence risk and ACT benefit in patients with rectal cancer undergoing upfront surgery.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Feasibility, reliability, and clinical value of genomic assay on pre-therapeutic biopsy for endocrine receptor-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer.

Endocrine receptor-positive (ER+) and HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) represents approximately 80% of all BCs. Most patients are treated with upfront surgery; however, 15%-30% will develop late recurrences. Genomic assay indication is usually based on postoperative pathological data including histology subtype, tumor size, lymph node status, SBR grade, and Ki67. Performing genomic testing on core needle biopsy specimens prior to surgery may offer several advantages. In this manuscript, we assess the feasibility, reliability, utility, and potential benefits of such genomic analyses performed on core needle biopsies. Several factors may lead to proposing genomic assay analysis on biopsy: (1) optimization of the patient pathway by reducing time to therapeutic decision-making, (2) predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET), and (3) refining prognostic assessment to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in patients for whom axillary surgery is not planned. Given the feasibility and reliability of genomic assay on core needle biopsies, it can be suggested that this practice may become more common in the near future. Knowledge of the evolutive risk determined by the result of genomic assay, as well as clinicopathological characteristics, allows more precise personalization of the therapeutic strategy, including the choice between upfront surgery and neoadjuvant therapy, the selection of systemic treatments, and decision-making in the absence of axillary staging.

breast cancer↗

PubMed2024

Myoferlin: A Potential Marker of Response to Radiation Therapy and Survival in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer often require neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy to downstage the disease, but the response is variable with no predictive biomarkers. We have previously revealed through proteomic profiling that myoferlin is associated with response to radiation therapy. The aims of this study were to further validate this finding and explore the potential for myoferlin to act as a prognostic and/or therapeutic target. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Immunohistochemical analysis of a tissue microarray (TMA) for 111 patients was used to validate the initial proteomic findings. Manipulation of myoferlin was achieved using small interfering RNA, a small molecular inhibitor (wj460), and a CRISPR-Cas9 knockout cell line. Radiosensitization after treatment was assessed using 2-dimensional clonogenic assays, 3-dimensional spheroid models, and patient-derived organoids. Underlying mechanisms were investigated using electrophoresis, immunofluorescence, and immunoblotting. RESULTS: Analysis of both the diagnostic biopsy and tumor resection samples confirmed that low myoferlin expression correlated with a good response to neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiation therapy. High myoferlin expression was associated with spread to local lymph nodes and worse 5-year survival (P = .01; hazard ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.27-10.04). This was externally validated using the Stratification in Colorectal Cancer database. Quantification of myoferlin using immunoblotting in immortalized colorectal cancer cell lines and organoids demonstrated that high myoferlin expression was associated with increased radioresistance. Biological and pharmacologic manipulation of myoferlin resulted in significantly increased radiosensitivity across all cell lines in 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional models. After irradiation, myoferlin knockdown cells had a significantly impaired ability to repair DNA double-strand breaks. This appeared to be mediated via nonhomologous end-joining. CONCLUSIONS: We have confirmed that high expression of myoferlin in rectal cancer is associated with poor response to neoadjuvant therapy and worse long-term survival. Furthermore, the manipulation of myoferlin led to increased radiosensitivity in vitro. This suggests that myoferlin could be targeted to enhance the sensitivity of patients with rectal cancer to radiation therapy, and further work is required.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Response-adapted surgical de-escalation following neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable mucosal HNSCC A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Recent encouraging outcomes with neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have generated interest in surgical de-escalation. However, the oncologic safety of response-adapted surgery (RAS) and its ability to achieve survival outcomes comparable to baseline-planned surgery (BPS) remain uncertain. METHODS: A systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and the Clinical Trials Registry for studies of neoadjuvant ICIs, with or without chemotherapy, in resectable mucosal HNSCC, that explicitly report surgical extent, between 2020-2025 was performed. Two independent reviewers extracted data following PRISMA guidelines. Main outcomes included major pathologic response (MPR), pathologic complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). Study-level proportions were pooled by random effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed by the I2 statistic. RESULTS: The comparative analysis consisted of 4 RAS studies (involving 202 patients) and 11 BPS studies (403 patients). The pooled overall EFS was 83.3% (76.9-88.2) for the former and 82% (75.2-87.2) for the latter (P=.751), and the respective pooled OS was 92.3% (87.5-95.3) and 91.4% (80.3-96.5) (P=.839). The pooled pCR rate was 41.7% (95% CI 5.4-48.4; I2=.0) for RAS and 19.8% (95%CI 13.3-29.6; I2=.62) for BPS (P=.001), while the MPR was not significantly different (59.6%, versus 48.5%, P=.245). RAS was associated with greater organ preservation and reduced need for mandibulectomy and free-flap reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: RAS following neoadjuvant ICIs in mucosal HNSCC may enable surgical de-escalation with preserved oncologic outcomes and improved function in selected patients. Larger prospective studies are warranted.

Humans↗