PubMed HealthSearch

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “oral oncology”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Ferroptosis in Oral Cancer: Mechanistic Insights and Clinical Prospects.

Ferroptosis, an iron-dependent form of regulated cell death characterized by lipid peroxidation, has emerged as a pivotal vulnerability in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). This review provides an overview of ferroptosis mechanisms and their implications for OSCC pathobiology and therapy. OSCC cells exhibit heightened reliance on anti-ferroptotic defenses such as GPX4, SLC7A11, FSP1, and Nrf2, and disrupting these pathways suppresses tumor growth and restores sensitivity to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. Genetic and epigenetic regulators, including p53, PER1, circ_0000140, and STARD4-AS1, critically modulate ferroptotic sensitivity, while metabolic enzymes such as ACSL4, LPCAT3, and TPI1 link ferroptosis to cellular plasticity and resistance. Preclinical studies highlight the promise of small-molecule inhibitors, repurposed agents (e.g., sorafenib, artesunate, trifluoperazine), natural compounds (e.g., piperlongumine, Evodia lepta, quercetin), and nanomedicine platforms for targeted ferroptosis induction. We further address ferroptosis within the tumor microenvironment, highlighting its immunogenic and context-dependent dual roles, and summarize genomic and transcriptomic evidence linking ferroptosis-related genes to patient prognosis. Beyond cancer, ferroptosis also contributes to non-malignant oral diseases, including pulpitis, periodontitis, and infection-associated inflammation, where inhibitors may protect tissues. Despite these advances, clinical translation is constrained by the lack of safe ferroptosis inducers and validated biomarkers. Future research should focus on developing pharmacologically viable GPX4 inhibitors, refining biomarker-driven patient stratification, and designing multimodal regimens that combine ferroptosis induction with standard therapies while preserving immune and tissue integrity. Ferroptosis therefore represents both a mechanistic framework and a translational opportunity to reshape oral oncology and broader oral disease management.

Humans

Oral melanoma in the immunotherapy era: Immune evasion, resistance, and therapeutic opportunities.

Oral melanoma (OM) is a rare and highly aggressive mucosal malignancy associated with poor survival and limited evidence to guide immunotherapy. This narrative review synthesizes current knowledge on OM immunobiology and its therapeutic implications. OM differs from cutaneous melanoma in its origin in sun-protected sites, genomic architecture, and heterogeneous immune microenvironments, features that can contribute to attenuated responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Anti-PD-1-based therapy has demonstrated clinical activity in mucosal melanoma, and selected OM cases have shown meaningful responses, including in multimodal and perioperative settings. However, OM-specific prospective data remain sparse, and the available evidence is largely derived from pooled mucosal melanoma cohorts or case reports. Emerging combination strategies, such as antiangiogenic agents, radiotherapy, and perioperative immunotherapy, remain insufficiently validated. This review critically reappraises the available evidence, identifies key knowledge gaps, and outlines future directions for biomarker-driven, OM-specific translational research.

Humans

A comparison of medroxyprogesterone serum concentrations by the oral or intramuscular route in patients with persistent or recurrent endometrial carcinoma.

A randomized study, comparing serum medroxyprogesterone concentrations by the oral and intramuscular routes, was performed on 22 patients with persistent or recurrent endometrial adenocarcinoma by six institutions of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. The oral group (11 patients) received cutaneous Provera (medroxyprogesterone), 50 mg three times a day, and the intramuscular group (11 patients) received 300 mg of Depo-Provera (medroxyprogesterone) weekly for at least 2 months. Serum levels were evaluated at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after administration and every day for the first week and weekly thereafter for 8 weeks. The mean serum levels (nanograms per milliliter) of medroxyprogesterone in the oral group were consistently higher than the corresponding mean levels of the intramuscular group. In addition, from the first through eighth weeks, the measurements (medians) for the oral group were statistically higher than those for the intramuscular group. Although the study indicates a significant increase in serum levels achieved by the oral route, the follow-up period of patients under study is too early to evaluate its clinical effectiveness as compared to the intramuscular route.

Adenocarcinoma

Chemotherapy of advanced measurable colon and rectal carcinoma with oral 5-fluorouracil, alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide or 6-thioguanine, with intravenous 5-fluorouracil or beta-2'-deoxythioguanosine or with oral 3(4-methyl-cyclohexyl)-1(2-chlorethyl)-1-nitrosourea: a Phase II-III study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (EST 4273).

In a randomized multi-institutional trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, 316 patients with advanced measurable colorectal adenocarcinoma were treated with a weekly schedule of 5-fluorouracil given orally and intravenously with oral-5-fluorouracil in combination with cyclophosphamide or 6-thioguanine, or with oral Methyl CCNU administered once every eight weeks. On failure or progression, 133 protocol patients crossed-over to a secondary therapy, while 116 other patients previously treated with 5-fluorouracil off protocol were randomized to treatment with Methyl CCNU or B-2'-deoxythioguanosine. Response rates among patients who had received no prior chemotherapy were 18% to oral 5-FU, 15% to intravenous 5-FU and to MeCCNU, 12% to 5-FU and 6-thioguanine and 5% to cyclophosphamide and 5-FU, with little activity (3% response rate) in crossover or previously treated patients. Treatment with 5-FU, particularly oral 5-FU was associated with the least drug-related toxicity. Hematologic toxicity was greatest with Methyl CCNU, but was no more frequent in previously treated than in untreated patients. A tendency toward cumulative bone marrow depression was noted. 5-FU was effective only in ambulatory patients, whereas responses among non-ambulatory patients were seen only in the group treated with Methyl-CCNU.

Adenocarcinoma

Chemotherapy studies in primary liver cancer: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

One hundred and sixty-eight patients with unresectable primary liver cancer were prospectively studied by members of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. These patients were randomized to receive treatment with oral 5-Fluorouracil (5FU), oral 5-Fu plus Streptozotocin, oral 5-Fu plus Methyl-CCNU or Adriamycin. The single agent treatments (oral 5-Fu and Adriamycin) were associated with less gastrointestinal toxicity than were the oral 5-Fu treatment combinations. A total of 15 partial responses were reported. Adriamycin appears to be the most active agent and responsible for 9 of the 15 responses. No response was seen in any of the 48 patients randomized to oral 5-Fu alone. The survival associated with oral 5-Fu alone was significantly shorter than the survival time associated with the remaining 3 treatment programs among both North American and South African patients. A multivariate model of survival was formulated. Covariates of prognostic significance were treatment, initial performance status and sex. South African black patients had a shorter survival time than North American black patients. Excluding oral 5-Fu from consideration, prognostic variables appeared to dominate any differences between the remaining treatments under study.

Adenoma, Bile Duct

Oral feedings in the cancer patient.

The importance of maintaining the cancer patient's nutritional status is now recognized as a major part of the medical care. It is necessary for the oncology team to be aware of the psychological and physiological factors that interfere with food acceptance so that the correct food can be offered at the right time in the most palatable form. The oral route is the preferred method of feeding, and nutritional supplements, chosen according to the individual patient's needs, are of great value in assuring an adequate oral intake. Diagnostic tests and therapy are frequent causes of disruption of the meal schedule and the dietary service must be flexible in providing the patient an opportunity to make up for missed meals. Taste disturbance, nausea, vomiting and mucositis caused by therapy may necessitate periods of intravenous hyperalimentation. Food aversions due to therapy can frequently be prevented by avoiding new or unusual foods in the hours before chemotherapy or irradiation. Regular nutrition counseling during clinic visits and/or hospitalization permits diet modification for specific therapeutic needs. The ultimate goal is the prevention of wasting and debilitation due to malnutrition in the cancer patient.

Bone Marrow Transplantation

Cryosurgery in stomato-oncology. A report of experiences gained over three years.

An account is given of the application and results of cryosurgery in stomato-oncology based on experiences gained over a 3-year period. Altogether 277 patients were treated for oral neoplasia and hemangiomas. It is stressed that cryosurgery is especially applicable for treating benign and malignant lesions of the anterior third of the oral cavity where healing is good, complications few, and inspection fairly easy. To date the short observation periods offers no adequate basis for making a direct comparison of this method with other more conventional techniques in complex tumor therapy.

Adolescent

Analysis of genomic traits of oral and laryngeal cancer: A comparative study.

Oral and laryngeal cancers exhibit overlapping clinical features but distinct genomic profiles. In a study of 60 Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas(HNSCC) cases (30 OSCC, 30 LSCC), NGS revealed TP53 mutations in 70% of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and 83% of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). CDKN2A alterations were more common in OSCC (40%) than LSCC (20%), while PIK3CA mutations were higher in LSCC (30%). NOTCH1 mutations were more frequent in OSCC (27%) than LSCC (10%). Pathway analysis showed disruptions in p53 and PI3K-Akt, with stronger enrichment in LSCC (ES: 3.42). The results suggest site-specific tumor biology influencing therapeutic targets. Molecular profiling is crucial for precision treatment in head and neck cancers.

Oral cancer

[General orientation of the treatment of mouth and pharyngeal neoplasms].

The treatment of carcinomas of oropharynx and oral cavity has changed rapidly over the last 15 years due to the progress of surgical technics and of oncological knowledge. As far as natural history and therapy are concerned, there are two opposing types of cancer: 1. Carcinomas developing from a mucous membrane covering a lymphoid tissue (cancers of the tonsil, some cancers of the palate and the base of tongue). Treatment is usually by radiotherapy, and surgery is mainly resorted to if radiotherapy fails. Therapeutic trials of chemotherapy are in progress. 2. Carcinomas developing from a mucous membrane covering muscles (cancers of the tongue, floor of the mouth and interval cheek) or bone of the mandible (carcinomas of the gingiva, floor of the mouth and gingiva, and retro-alveolar area). The therapy is described. The principles of treatment of the regional lymph nodes are also described.

Bone and Bones

Adjuvant alectinib versus chemotherapy in resected ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ALINA): health-related quality-of-life and safety outcomes from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: For patients with resected, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), adjuvant alectinib significantly improved disease-free survival versus platinum-based chemotherapy in the global, phase 3, open-label, randomised ALINA trial. We report safety and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes from the ALINA trial. METHODS: Eligible patients aged 18 years or older with resected, ALK-positive, stage IB (≥4 cm)-IIIA NSCLC (per the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Union for International Cancer Control Cancer Staging Manual 7th edition) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 were randomly assigned (1:1) via a block-stratified randomisation method to receive oral alectinib (600 mg twice daily) for 24 months or intravenous platinum-based chemotherapy for four 3-week cycles. Randomisation was stratified according to disease stage and race. The primary endpoint, previously reported, was disease-free survival. Safety was a secondary endpoint and HRQoL was an exploratory endpoint. Safety was assessed by the investigator as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5·0 until 28 days after the last alectinib dose or chemotherapy cycle. HRQoL was assessed via the Short-Form 36-item health survey version 2 (SF-36v2) questionnaire at baseline, every 3 weeks to week 12, then every 12 weeks until disease recurrence, consent withdrawal, death, or week 96. Norm-based scoring was applied; clinically meaningful changes were defined using the SF-36v2 manual. Safety was assessed in the safety-evaluable population and HRQoL in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03456076) and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Aug 16, 2018, and Dec 8, 2021, 257 patients were assigned to receive alectinib (n=130) or chemotherapy (n=127). 123 (48%) patients were male and 134 (52%) were female; 143 (56%) were Asian. The safety-evaluable population comprised 128 patients who received alectinib and 120 patients who received chemotherapy; median duration of safety follow-up was 24·8 months (IQR 22·0-24·9) in the alectinib group and 3·7 months (IQR 3·7-3·8) in the chemotherapy group. The safety of adjuvant alectinib was generally consistent with its known profile. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were blood creatine phosphokinase increased (eight [6%] of 128), alanine aminotransferase increased (two [2%] of 128), and blood bilirubin increased (two [2%] of 128) in the alectinib group, and neutrophil count decreased (12 [10%] of 120), neutropenia (ten [8%] of 120), and nausea (five [4%] of 120) in the chemotherapy group. Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in two (2%; one each with appendicitis and pneumonitis) of 128 patients in the alectinib group and eight (7%) of 120 patients in the chemotherapy group ( most common were gastrointestinal disorders in three [3%] patients). No deaths due to adverse events were reported in either group. There were fewer discontinuations due to adverse events with alectinib (seven [5%]) versus chemotherapy (15 [13%]). A clinically meaningful difference in improvement from baseline was seen at week 12 for bodily pain, role physical, mental health, social functioning, and vitality SF-36v2 domains with alectinib; improvements in physical and mental HRQoL were maintained over 2 years of active treatment (at week 96, mean Mental Component Summary score: 49·9 [SD 10·4]; mean Physical Component Summary score: 48·8 [SD 7·2]) and reached levels similar to the general population (population norm: 50). INTERPRETATION: For patients with resected ALK-positive NSCLC, adjuvant alectinib had a manageable safety profile; HRQoL improved and was maintained over 2 years of active treatment. Together with the disease-free survival benefit seen in ALINA, these data support adjuvant alectinib as an important new standard-of-care for patients with resected ALK-positive NSCLC. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Adult

ICRF-159 (razoxane) in the treatment of pediatric solid tumors: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

ICRF-159 is active in several animal tumor model systems and human adult malignancies. In this phase II study, ICRF-159 was given on a weekly schedule, 3000 mg/m2/day, orally in three divided doses at 6-hour intervals to 78 children with a variety of malignant neoplasms. Fifty-three patients were evaluable for tumor response. Toxicity was primarily hematopoietic and gastrointestinal. There were no responses in any of the eight patients with osteogenic sarcoma, four with lymphoma, five with Ewing's sarcoma, ten with neuroblastoma, or six with rhabdomyosarcoma. There was a transient partial response in one of four children with Wilms' tumor. Further trials with this drug using this schedule are not indicated for the common childhood solid tumors.

Adolescent

Pharmaceutical services in a pediatric oncology day hospital.

The role of the pharmacist in a treatment center in which pediatric cancer patients receive intensive chemotherapy with a minimum of inhospital admission time is discussed. Functions of the pharmacist include: preparation and dispensing of oral and parenteral medications; monitoring of physicians' orders; maintaining patient profiles; maintaining investigational drug records; providing drug information; and conducting inservice educational programs.

Child

A phase II study of methyl CCNU in the treatment of solid tumors and lymphomas: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

In March of 1972, the Southwest Oncology Group initiated a Phase II study, No. 7200, utilizing methyl-CCNU in the treatment of patients with solid tumors and lymphomas. Initially, they received 200 mg/m2 orally as a single dose every 6 weeks. The dose was subsequently reduced in poor-risk patients to 150 mg/m2. There were 69 responses noted in 675 evaluable patients (10%). The highest response rates were noted in patients with Hodgkin's disease (13/31, 35%), malignant gliomas of the brain (8/29, 28%), anaplastic carcinomas of the lung (5/20, 25%), and squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (5/29, 17%). Squamous cell tumors appeared to be more responsive than adenocarcinomas (15% vs. 5%, respectively). Hematologic toxicity was cumulative, and was influenced by dose and prior treatment. There appeared to be no cross-resistance in patients previously treated with alkylating agents. Methyl-CCNU is an active antineoplastic agent. Further studies are indicated in order to determine relative effectiveness.

Adenocarcinoma

Phase III comparison of the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal cancer with bolus weekly 5-FU vs. methyl-CCNU plus bolus weekly 5-FU. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

In a randomized and stratified study, 294 patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer were treated either with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 weekly intravenously (i.v.) or 5-FU 400 mg/m2 i.v. weekly plus methyl-CCNU 175 mg/m2 orally (p.o.) every 6 weeks. The response rate in colorectal cancer with 5-FU was 9.5% while the two-drug treatment produced a response of 31.8% (p=.009). The response in all gastrointestinal cancers to 5-FU was 10.6% as compared with29.3% for the combination (p=.012). All responses were partial. The two-drug regimen is more effective and more toxic than weekly 5-FU therapy.

Adolescent