PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “pharmacogenetic”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Discordance between availability of pharmacogenetics studies and pharmacogenetics-based prescribing information for the top 200 drugs.

BACKGROUND: Despite growing numbers of pharmacogenetics studies, little pharmacogenetics-based prescribing information is available to practitioners. It is possible that the lack of prescribing data for commonly used drugs is due to a paucity of evidence-based pharmacogenetics literature for these agents. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between pharmacogenetics prescribing data in drug package inserts (PIs) and pharmacogenetics research literature for agents represented in the top 200 prescribed drugs for 2003. METHODS: A PubMed search (to August 7, 2004) was performed to identify pharmacogenetics studies relevant to the top 200 drugs. These data were compared with PIs for drugs in the top 200 list that contained pharmacogenetics prescribing information. RESULTS: Pharmacogenetics data in the literature were available for 71.3% of the top 200 drugs. The gene involved coded for a drug-metabolizing enzyme in 34.5% of the literature sampled. The remaining 65.5% of the pharmacogenetics studies contained information largely related to genetic variability in target proteins and drug transporters. Three drugs with PIs containing pharmacogenetics prescribing information deemed to be useful to guide therapy were in the top 200 list (celecoxib, fluoxetine, pantoprazole). There was no consensus on the strength of association between genetic variability and drug response for these agents. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of specific pharmacogenetics-based prescribing information in PIs for commonly used drugs does not seem to be related to a paucity of pharmacogenetics data in the research literature. Rather, other factors including, but not limited to, the uncertain clinical relevance of genetic associations may make practical prescribing recommendations difficult.

Drug Prescriptions↗
PubMed2005

Pharmacogenetics in drug regulation: promise, potential and pitfalls.

Pharmacogenetic factors operate at pharmacokinetic as well as pharmacodynamic levels-the two components of the dose-response curve of a drug. Polymorphisms in drug metabolizing enzymes, transporters and/or pharmacological targets of drugs may profoundly influence the dose-response relationship between individuals. For some drugs, although retrospective data from case studies suggests that these polymorphisms are frequently associated with adverse drug reactions or failure of efficacy, the clinical utility of such data remains unproven. There is, therefore, an urgent need for prospective data to determine whether pre-treatment genotyping can improve therapy. Various regulatory guidelines already recommend exploration of the role of genetic factors when investigating a drug for its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, dose-response relationship and drug interaction potential. Arising from the global heterogeneity in the frequency of variant alleles, regulatory guidelines also require the sponsors to provide additional information, usually pharmacogenetic bridging data, to determine whether data from one ethnic population can be extrapolated to another. At present, sponsors explore pharmacogenetic influences in early clinical pharmacokinetic studies but rarely do they carry the findings forward when designing dose-response studies or pivotal studies. When appropriate, regulatory authorities include genotype-specific recommendations in the prescribing information. Sometimes, this may include the need to adjust a dose in some genotypes under specific circumstances. Detailed references to pharmacogenetics in prescribing information and pharmacogenetically based prescribing in routine therapeutics will require robust prospective data from well-designed studies. With greater integration of pharmacogenetics in drug development, regulatory authorities expect to receive more detailed genetic data. This is likely to complicate the drug evaluation process as well as result in complex prescribing information. Genotype-specific dosing regimens will have to be more precise and marketing strategies more prudent. However, not all variations in drug responses are related to pharmacogenetic polymorphisms. Drug response can be modulated by a number of non-genetic factors, especially co-medications and presence of concurrent diseases. Inappropriate prescribing frequently compounds the complexity introduced by these two important non-genetic factors. Unless prescribers adhere to the prescribing information, much of the benefits of pharmacogenetics will be squandered. Discovering highly predictive genotype-phenotype associations during drug development and demonstrating their clinical validity and utility in well-designed prospective clinical trials will no doubt better define the role of pharmacogenetics in future clinical practice. In the meantime, prescribing should comply with the information provided while pharmacogenetic research is deservedly supported by all concerned but without unrealistic expectations.

Dose-Response Relationship, Drug↗
PubMed2026

The impact of pharmacogenetic-informed care on medication adherence and psychological factors associated with adherence: A narrative review.

Improvement in medication adherence is often proposed as a potential advantage of pharmacogenetic-guided prescribing over a traditional one-size-fits-all approach. This paper provides a review of the published literature and presents the findings of studies that measure adherence to medication as an outcome of pharmacogenetic-informed care, or that measure the impact of pharmacogenetic-informed care on psychological factors that are associated with medication adherence. Adherence-related psychological factors are mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to provide insight into how participants interact with pharmacogenetic-informed care as an intervention and to consider this in the context of medication adherence. A total of 23 studies were included, with 10 quantitative studies measuring medication adherence outcomes associated with pharmacogenetic-informed care. Five of these studies found a statistically significant improvement in adherence in the pharmacogenetic-tested group, two reported a small but non-significant trend, and three showed no difference. Additionally, 13 studies examined the impact of pharmacogenetic-informed care on psychological factors related to adherence. These factors were mapped to 10 TDF domains: knowledge (8 studies); social/professional role and identity (1); beliefs about capabilities (2); optimism (4); beliefs about consequences (10); intentions (5); goals (1); memory, attention and decision processes (7); social influences (4); and emotion (8). The findings suggest that although the evidence for pharmacogenetic-informed care improving medication adherence is mixed and limited, pharmacogenetic-informed care appears to positively influence psychological factors that may support adherence. These include improving knowledge, supporting decision-making and generally being perceived as a positive experience by patients.

adherence↗
PubMed1997

Pharmacogenetics in biological perspective.

What have we learned? Pharmacogenetics, heritable variation in response to xenobiotics, is present in all forms of life. Initially, human data perhaps have created the most excitement, and they provide much biochemical detail. However, if we look at pharmacogenetic variation of insects and bacteria, we see it as a characteristic of populations; individuals with inborn resistance to various toxicants can cause the survival of a population by the process of Darwinian selection. Diversity of a population and Darwinian selection are different milestones serving population survival. Variation of drug response may represent variation of drug targets, drug metabolism, and probably drug transport. Metabolic variation appears to be the most prominent; at present, it is not clear whether this prominence has historical or biological causes. It is an interesting exercise to compare pharmacogenetic resistance with intoxication and resistance to infection by invasion of disease-carrying bacteria or other pathogens. The big difference is that pathogens tend to show variabilities that drugs do not have. The immune system is made to deal with the genetic variabilities linked to the short life span of most pathogens. However, there are, besides the immune system, several cases of genetic host resistance associated with the long life span of mammalian hosts. Such genetic host resistances are factors equivalent to pharmacogenetic variation. Current data pertain to resistance against malaria, tuberculosis, cholera, and AIDS. Most pharmacogenetic variants within a population are preadaptive, that is, they are established before xenobiotic exposure. Hence, one must postulate a multiplicity of variants in a population capable of resisting a multiplicity of drugs. The persistence of this multiplicity suggests that most variants are either present in heterozygous form and are thereby advantageous for their carriers, or they are selectively neutral mutants. It means that the biological cost of pharmacogenetic diversity, measured in terms of reduced fertility, should be low in a population. The frequencies of variant genes are usually not the same in different populations. Also the nucleotide substitutions in a variable gene often differ between populations. In other words, pharmacogenetic differences between populations are typical events. Pharmacogenetics is usually thought of as the study of a situation in which a single gene product exerts control over a given drug response so that a failure to respond, or an excessive response, may result. However, one should not forget that random variation is always present, probably reflecting the randomness of mutations plus variation of any environmental factors that might contribute. This underlying randomness of variation will always affect the picture of any all-or-none variation. Future pharmacogenetics must deal with both random and monogenic variation.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Patients' and physicians' perspectives on pharmacogenetic testing.

INTRODUCTION: The integration of pharmacogenetic testing into routine care will, in part, depend upon the patients' and physicians' acceptance of these tests. Empirical data regarding patients' and physicians' views on pharmacogenetic testing are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To explore patients' and physicians' perspectives on the potential implications of pharmacogenetic testing, particularly focusing on asthma, and to analyze the possible determinants of their expectations, hopes and fears. METHODS: We conducted telephone interviews with patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease taking part in a larger pharmacogenetic study, in addition to general practitioners (GPs) from a different region in Germany. A total of 328 patients and 378 GPs were invited to participate. Determinants of their attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing were assessed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Informed consent to participate in this study was given by 196 patients (60%) and 106 GPs (28%). Most patients (96%) and physicians (52%) appreciated the availability of pharmacogenetic tests for a disease such as asthma. Approximately a third of the patients worried about potential unfavorable test results (35%) and violation of privacy (36%). Female patients were more likely to have a fearful attitude (odds ratio [OR]=2.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.58-5.12). Younger patients were generally more likely to be hopeful about the usefulness of pharmacogenetic testing (OR=2.12; CI=1.01-4.46). The GPs' concerns were mainly related to the possibility that patients might either be put under pressure to be tested (72%) or be disadvantaged at private health insurance agencies (61%). The nature of the responsible institution, the clarity of the research aim and explicit informed consent from patients influenced a physicians' decision regarding whether to support a pharmacogenetic study. CONCLUSION: The concerns of patients and GPs differ somewhat with respect to negative psychosocial consequences, discrimination or violation of privacy. Development of information for physicians and patients would be helpful in preventing unrealistic fears or hopes.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Can pharmacogenetics help rescue drugs withdrawn from the market?

Observations over the later half of the last century have suggested that genetic factors may be the prime determinant of drug response, at least for some drugs. Retrospectively gathered data have provided further support to the notion that genotype-based prescribing will improve the overall efficacy rates and minimize adverse drug reactions (ADRs), making personalized medicine a reality. During the last 16 years, 38 drugs have been withdrawn from major markets due to safety concerns. Inevitably, a question arises as to whether it might be possible to 'rescue' some of these drugs by promoting genotype-based prescribing. However, ironically pharmacogenetics has not perceptibly improved the risk/benefit of a large number of genetically susceptible drugs that are already in wide clinical use and are associated with serious ADRs. Drug-induced hepatotoxicity and QT interval prolongation (with or without torsade de pointes) account for 24 (63%) of these 38 drug withdrawals. In terms of the number of drugs implicated, both these toxicities are on the increase. Many others have had to be withdrawn due to their inappropriate use. This paper discusses the criteria that a drug would need to fulfill, and summarizes the likely regulatory requirements, before its pharmacogenetic rescue can be considered to be realistic. One drug that fulfils these criteria is perhexiline (withdrawn worldwide in 1988) and is discussed in some detail. For the majority of these 38 drugs there are, at present, no candidates for genetic traits to which the toxicity that led to their withdrawal may be linked. For a few other drugs where a potential candidate for a genetic trait might explain the toxicity of concern, the majority of patients who experienced the index toxicity had easily managed nongenetic risk factors. It may be possible to rescue these drugs simply by careful attention to their dose, interaction potential and prescribing patterns, but without the need for any pharmacogenetic test. In addition, the pharmacogenetic rescue of drugs might not be as effective as anticipated as hardly any pharmacogenetic test is known to have the required test efficiency to promote individualized therapy. Multiple pathways of drug elimination, contribution to toxicity by metabolites as well as the parent drug, gene-gene interactions, multiple mechanisms of toxicity and inadequate characterization of phenotype account for this lack of highly predictive tests. The clinical use of tests that lack the required efficiency carries the risks of over- or under-dosing some patients, denying the drug to others and decreasing physician vigilance of patients. Above all, at present, prescribing physicians lack an adequate understanding of pharmacogenetics and its limitations. It is also questionable whether their prescribing will comply with the requirements for pretreatment pharmacogenetic tests to make pharmacogenetic rescue a realistic goal.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗
PubMed2006

Managing asthma in the 21st century: role of pharmacogenetics.

As discussed above, pharmacogenetics offers the opportunity to ascertain associations between genetic variability and response (both salutary and adverse) to various asthma medications. Although there have been multiple asthma pharmacogenetic studies, the field of pharmacogenetics is still in its infancy. As this field advances, it is estimated that an increasing proportion of individual variation in responses to pharmacotherapy will be predictable based on associations with particular genetic polymorphisms or patterns of polymorphisms. These associations hold out the promise of being able to individualize pharmacotherapy by providing specific therapy to those most likely to respond, while avoiding therapy in those most likely to suffer adverse effects. Currently, only the pharmacogenetic effects of position 16 of the beta-adrenergic receptor appear to be of sufficient magnitude to affect asthma therapy, but further understanding of the mechanism of this association as well as prospective replication with long-acting beta-agonists is still required to bring pharmacogenetics into the clinical arena. Most other pharmacogenetic effects are likely to be of smaller magnitude or, as with 5-LO or CRHR1 polymorphisms, less common. Thus, ultimately, we most likely will use "panels" of polymorphisms to calculate the relative risk-benefit ratio of a particular therapeutic course for an individual patient. It is hoped that, within the next decade, pharmacogenetic information will allow us to treat those who can benefit most from particular asthma medications and to avoid toxicity by administering medications to those unlikely to experience toxicity. If pharmacogenetics fulfills its promise, then not only will we be able to administer corticosteroids and other therapies to pediatric patients with asthma who are most likely to respond or to those least likely to experience adverse effects but we also will be able to introduce or develop drugs for asthma that would otherwise have been held back due to potential toxicity in a subset of patients.

Acetates↗
PubMed2006

The potential of pharmacogenetics in the treatment of epilepsy.

Pharmacogenetics studies how genetic variants influence individual drug responses. Although pharmacogenetics is currently the subject of intensive research in several disease domains, it remains relatively unexplored in the field of epilepsy. Drug treatment of epilepsy is characterized by unpredictability of efficacy, adverse drug reactions and optimal doses in individual patients. Moreover, a substantial fraction of patients develop drug refractory epilepsy despite optimal treatment. Insights in the pathogenesis of epilepsy and the mechanisms of action of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have improved our understanding of the genetic determinants of AED response. The first reports in epilepsy pharmacogenetics are becoming available, and large-scale pharmacogenetic studies are now possible thanks to recent advances in genetics and decreasing genotyping costs. It is hoped that ultimately, findings in epilepsy pharmacogenetics will lead to a more efficacious and less harmful treatment of epilepsy, development of more effective AEDs and facilitation of clinical trials of new AEDs. However, although pharmacogenetics will undoubtedly improve our insight into the mechanisms underlying response to AEDs and perhaps into the pathogenesis of drug refractory epilepsy, clinical application of any findings is expected to be a long process, and considerable practical and theoretical hurdles need to be overcome before pharmacogenetic information will prove of any major utility in the clinical setting. This review addresses current knowledge on genetic factors contributing to AED response and discusses the potential of epilepsy pharmacogenetics in the clinical treatment of epilepsy and new AED development.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed2006

[State of the art of pharmacogenetic diagnostics in drug therapy].

Individual differences in the effect and side effect of drugs are partly due to genetic factors (genetic polymorphisms). The responsible polymorphisms lie in genes encoding for drug metabolism and transport but also in direct and indirect drug targets. While genetic variants in pharmacokinetic structures exert effects on drug efficacy via the differences in drug exposure, polymorphisms in drug targets can directly affect clinical efficacy and may lead to a broad variation spectrum between inefficacy and severe side effects. However, at present, our knowledge on genetic variants in drug targets is less detailed than the knowledge on pharmacogenetic variability within drug metabolism. A goal of pharmacogenetic diagnostics implemented in clinical practice is to better predict the individual drug effects on the basis of molecular-genetic profiles. Therapy recommendations can be given as dose adjustments, in particular in the case of polymorphisms of drug metabolizing enzymes which will lead to less variable drug concentrations. At present there are few examples of the application of pharmacogenetic tests in Germany in order to improve and individualize drug therapy. The reasons for this are multifold. On the one hand it is due to the limited awareness of pharmacogenetics; on the other hand it may be due to the lack of fast and economical availability of the appropriate laboratory tests. The most important reason, however, may be that most results of pharmacogenetic research are so far not translated into therapeutically usable conclusions and therapy recommendations. Thus, testing for a genotype without concrete consequences for the drug therapy of an individual patient does not make sense. Pharmacogenetic research, thereby, stands in many cases at the threshold to clinical applicability and in many cases, for instance for the genotyping for thiopurine methyltransferase polymorphisms prior to azathioprine therapy or of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase polymorphisms prior to treatment with 5-fluorouracil, as well as for diagnostics of CYP2D6 before therapy with certain tricyclic antidepressants and neuroleptics, one would ask already today whether a such drug therapy is still responsible without pharmacogenetic diagnostics.

Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System↗
PubMed2006

The promise of pharmacogenetics: assessing the prospects for disease and patient stratification.

Pharmacogenetics is an emerging biotechnology concerned with understanding the genetic basis of drug response, and promises to transform the development, marketing and prescription of medicines. This paper is concerned with analysing the move towards segmented drug markets, which is implicit in the commercial development of pharmacogenetics. It is claimed that in future who gets a particular drug will be determined by their genetic make up. Drawing on ideas from the sociology of expectations we examine how pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies are constructing, responding to and realising particular 'visions' or expectations of pharmacogenetics and market stratification. We argue that the process of market segmentation remains uncertain, but that the outcome will be fashioned according to the convergence and divergence of the interests of key commercial actors. Qualitative data based both on interviews with industry executives and company documentation will be used to explore how different groups of companies are developing pharmacogenetics in distinct ways, and what consequences these different pathways might have for both clinical practice and health policy. In particular, the analysis will show a convergence of interests between biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies for creating segmented markets for new drugs, but a divergence of interest in segmenting established markets. Whilst biotechnology firms have a strong incentive to innovate, the pharmaceutical industry has no commercial interest in segmenting markets for existing products. This has important implications, as many of the claimed public health benefits of pharmacogenetics will derive from changing the prescribing of existing medicines. One significant implication of this is that biotechnology companies who wish to apply pharmacogenetics to existing medicines will have to explore an alternative convergence of interests with healthcare payers and providers (health insurers, HMOs, MCOs and national health systems). Healthcare providers may have a strong incentive to use pharmacogenetics to make the prescribing of existing medicine more cost-effective. However, we conclude by suggesting that a question mark hangs over their ability to provide the necessary economic and structural resources to bring such a vision to fruition.

Biotechnology↗
PubMed2005

Pharmacogenetics of antihypertensive treatment.

Hypertension is a common disorder associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, in the US only about one-third of those who are aware of their hypertensive status have their blood pressure adequately controlled. One reason for this is the variable and unpredictable response individuals have to pharmacologic treatment. Clinicians often resort to "trial-and-error" to match patients with effective drug treatment. Hypertension pharmacogenetics seeks to find genetic predictors of drug response. To date, more than forty studies have investigated associations between genetic polymorphisms and response to antihypertensive drugs. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta blockers have been most frequently studied, followed by angiotensin II blockers, diuretics, adrenergic alpha-agonists, and calcium channel blockers. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system genes have been the most widely studied, with the angiotensin-converting enzyme I/D variant being typed in about one-half of all hypertension pharmacogenetic studies. In total, 160 possible gene polymorphism-drug interactions have been explored, with about one-quarter of these showing that genes predict drug response. However, disparate and conflicting findings have been the rule rather than the exception, and the discovery of clinically relevant antihypertensive drug-response genes remains elusive. While there is a growing enthusiasm that pharmacogenetics of hypertension is important, the translation of pharmacogenetic findings to clinical practice in the future will depend on additional studies to enhance our pharmacogenetics knowledge base, the availability of pharmacogenetic screening tests that are affordable and easy to implement in clinical practice, a cohort of clinicians who are trained to interpret genetic test results, and health care systems that pay for them. Caution regarding the future of hypertension pharmacogenetics is warranted.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2002

Pharmacogenetics in rheumatology: the prospects and limitations of an emerging field.

OBJECTIVES: To review the fundamental concepts of pharmacogenetics and analyse how the broad principles of this rapidly emerging field may influence the treatment of rheumatic disease in future. METHODS: The names of common rheumatic drugs and the terms 'pharmacogenetics', 'pharmacogenomics' and 'genetic polymorphism' were used as keywords to search the Medline and Current Contents databases. General review articles on pharmacogenetics were also examined. RESULTS: Pharmacogenetics is the study of how genetic differences influence the variability in drug toxicity and efficacy. Although the principles of pharmacogenetics have been known for several decades, recent technological advances have hastened the possibility of direct clinical applications. Most studies so far have been phenotypic analyses, but genotyping is now readily available for many polymorphisms. There are several examples pertinent to rheumatology that illustrate the important principles and foretell the usefulness of pharmacogenetics in individualizing therapy. However, further studies are needed. CONCLUSIONS: Because traditional pharmacotherapy in rheumatology has been empirical and because of the slow acting nature of many anti-rheumatic medications, the risk of significant side-effects and the increasing armamentarium of drugs available, pharmacogenetics is particularly relevant to rheumatology. There are many scientific and non-scientific concerns that should be addressed in future studies.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed2004

Pharmacogenetic testing, informed consent and the problem of secondary information.

Numerous benefits for patients have been predicted if prescribing decisions were routinely accompanied by pharmacogenetic testing. So far, little attention has been paid to the possibility that the routine application of this new technology could result in considerable harm to patients. This article emphasises that pharmacogenetic testing shares both the opportunities and the pitfalls with 'conventional' disease-genetic testing. It demonstrates that performing pharmacogenetic tests as well as interpreting the results are extraordinarily complex issues requiring a high level of expertise. It further argues that pharmacogenetic testing can have a huge impact on clinical decisions and may influence the therapeutic strategy as well as the clinical monitoring of a patient. This view challenges the predominant paradigm that pharmacogenetic testing will predict patients' responses to medicines, but that it will not provide any other significant disease-specific predictive information about the patient or family members. The article also questions published proposals to reduce the consent procedure for pharmacogenetic testing to a simple statement that the physician wishes to test a sample of the patient's DNA to see if a drug will be safe or whether it will work, and presents an alternative model that is better suited to protect patient's interests and to obtain meaningful informed consent. The paper concludes by outlining conditions for the application of pharmacogenetic testing in clinical practice in a way that can make full use of its potential benefits while minimising possible harm to patients and their families.

Drug Therapy↗
PubMed2006

Pharmacogenetics in clinical practice: considerations for testing.

Pharmacogenetics is a rapidly evolving field that will undoubtedly lead to the development of pharmacogenetic tests. Such tests will need to be assimilated into healthcare systems, but represent a further call on scarce healthcare resources. Therefore, in order for a pharmacogenetic test to fulfill its potential beyond the laboratory and into the clinical environment, it must prove itself on a wide range of multifaceted criteria. The test must have proven and reproducible analytical and clinical validity, and stand up to critical appraisal of clinical utility and cost-effectiveness. Pharmacogenetic testing can be considered to be a form of screening, and the experience that has been gained to date in evaluating other forms of screening tests may prove beneficial in evaluating pharmacogenetic technology. It is essential that the goals of pharmacogenetic testing are defined as early as possible to ensure that appropriate studies can be designed to provide the evidence base, and thereby enable appropriate evaluation of the technology by clinicians and healthcare administrators for incorporation into clinical practice. This review focuses on issues that will need to be considered in the scientific assessment of pharmacogenetic testing.

Biomarkers↗