Terminology and electrophysiologic concepts in cardiac arrhythmias. V. Phase 3 block and phase 4 block. Part 1.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Animals↗
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Results for “phase 3”
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Terminology and electrophysiologic concepts in cardiac arrhythmias. VI. Phase 3 block and phase 4 block. Part 2.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗
Cabozantinib for advanced grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors: subgroup analysis of the phase 3 CABINET trial (Alliance A021602).
Well-differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have recently been described as a distinct category, and randomized data regarding efficacy of therapy for these patients are scarce. In the phase 3 CABINET trial, cabozantinib improved PFS compared with placebo in patients with advanced, previously treated, progressive extra-pancreatic NETs (epNETs) and pancreatic NETs (pNETs) of all grades. Here, we evaluate if these results remain consistent in a subgroup of patients with well-differentiated G3 NETs. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic epNETs or pNETs were randomized 2:1 in independent cohorts to receive cabozantinib 60 mg daily vs placebo. We analyzed outcomes of the subset of patients with G3 NETs (Ki-67 > 20%), combining patients in the pNET and epNET cohorts due to small sample sizes. Twenty-four patients had G3 NETs, 16 randomized to cabozantinib and 8 to placebo. Primary sites included pancreas (n = 12), GI tract (n = 7), unknown primary sites (n = 3), and lung/thymus (n = 2). Median PFS for patients with G3 NETs treated with cabozantinib was 7.9 vs 3 months with placebo (HR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.04-0.57, 1-sided log-rank P = 0.0034). The confirmed overall radiographic response rate was 25% (4/16) with cabozantinib vs 0% (0/8) with placebo. Safety outcomes were consistent with published data for the trial as a whole. Subset analysis of the CABINET trial showed improved PFS associated with cabozantinib vs placebo for G3 NETs of pancreatic and extra-pancreatic origin. Despite limited numbers, these results suggest that cabozantinib can be an effective option for patients with advanced G3 NETs. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03375320.
Humans↗
Microbiological analysis and whole-genome sequencing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae from the microbiological failures in the international, zoliflodacin, phase 3, clinical trial for treatment of uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhoea: a retrospective, genomic, observational study.
BACKGROUND: Zoliflodacin, a first-in-class oral bacterial, DNA gyrase (GyrB) inhibitor, showed non-inferiority to ceftriaxone combined with azithromycin in a recent large international, phase 3, randomised controlled trial for treatment of uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhoea. The aim of this study was to describe the microbiological and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analyses of paired baseline (pre-treatment) and test-of-cure (TOC) gonococcal isolates from the zoliflodacin phase 3, randomised controlled trial to further characterise and evaluate the protocol-specified microbiological failures with zoliflodacin (n=22) or ceftriaxone and azithromycin (n=1). METHODS: In this retrospective, genomic, observational study, results from antimicrobial susceptibility testing (agar dilution method) of isolates (n=960; 936 baseline isolates from 763 participants and 24 TOC isolates [23 with a paired baseline isolate in the same anatomical site] from 20 participants) collected during the zoliflodacin phase 3, randomised controlled trial done in 16 outpatient clinics in Belgium, the Netherlands, South Africa, Thailand, and the USA (Nov 6, 2019-March 16, 2023) are described. WGS analysis was performed on paired baseline and TOC isolates from participants with microbiological failures (zoliflodacin 44 isolates [19 participants]; ceftriaxone and azithromycin two isolates [one participant]), and the three baseline isolates with highest zoliflodacin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC 0·5 mg/L). FINDINGS: All isolates were inhibited by the same zoliflodacin concentrations (MICs ≤0·008 to 0·5 mg/L) as wild-type strains cultured internationally in 2013-23. In participants with a microbiological failure after zoliflodacin treatment (n=22, 19 participants), zoliflodacin MIC values for baseline and TOC isolates were similar, and resistance selection was lacking. WGS showed that five (23%) of 22 infections (95% CI 10-43 [in four participants]) of zoliflodacin microbiological failures had different strains at TOC versus baseline. In 17 zoliflodacin microbiological failures (15 participants), isolates at baseline and TOC were indistinguishable. 13 of these 17 microbiological failures, corresponding to 59% (95% CI 39-77; 13 of 22) of all zoliflodacin microbiological failures, were in urogenital or rectal sites in 11 participants and the isolates had zoliflodacin MICs less than or equal to 0·008 to 0·25 mg/L. The single microbiological failure after ceftriaxone and azithromycin treatment had different strains at TOC versus at baseline. No sequenced isolates had mutations associated with elevated zoliflodacin MICs. INTERPRETATION: In the zoliflodacin phase 3, randomised controlled trial, 23% of the zoliflodacin microbiological failures and the single ceftriaxone and azithromycin microbiological failure had different gonococcal strains at TOC versus baseline, which suggests reinfections and not treatment failures. In addition, 59% of the zoliflodacin microbiological failures, all in anogenital sites, had no obvious microbiological explanation based on the low zoliflodacin MICs, previous pharmacodynamic studies, and no evidence of resistance selection after zoliflodacin therapy. A reinfection as the cause for these microbiological failures could not be excluded. We recommend that WGS is implemented in future randomised controlled trials for gonorrhoea treatment to further evaluate possible microbiological failures, exclude reinfections (to avoid underestimating the cure rates), and characterise antimicrobial resistance determinants. FUNDING: GARDP through grants from Germany BMFTR (03KA1831), UK DHSC as part of GAMRIF, Japan MHLW, the Netherlands' Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport and Directorate-General for International Cooperation, the Federal Office of Public Health of Switzerland, the Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, and Örebro University Hospital, Sweden.
Humans↗
Nipocalimab Phase 3 Dose Selection for Severe Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn.
Nipocalimab, a neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) blocker, is under evaluation for severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). In the Phase 2 UNITY trial, weekly intravenous antenatal treatment with nipocalimab at dose regimens of 30 and 45 mg/kg prevented fetal anemia requiring intrauterine transfusion (IUT) in 54% of high-risk pregnancies and delayed the need for IUTs versus their previous pregnancies in the remaining 46% of pregnancies. This analysis aimed to select a weekly dose regimen of nipocalimab for the Phase 3 study in severe HDFN (NCT05912517) that maintains FcRn blockade throughout antenatal treatment, including with an unplanned dosing delay of up to 3 days. Observed pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data from UNITY (i.e., nipocalimab concentrations, FcRn occupancy, and serum IgG) were analyzed using a model-based approach. A PK/PD model originally developed in nonpregnant participants was updated to incorporate gestational weight gain. Nipocalimab PK and FcRn occupancy were described by a two-compartment model with nonlinear, dose-dependent PK, which captured longitudinal PK, FcRn occupancy, and IgG profiles during dosing and return toward baseline postpartum after discontinuation. Both 30 and 45 mg/kg achieved ∼80%-85% reductions in maternal IgG; however, 30 mg/kg showed greater variability in predose trough concentrations, increasing the risk of falling below concentrations required for full FcRn occupancy across antenatal treatment. Simulations incorporating PK/PD variability indicated that 45 mg/kg weekly per current weight maintained full FcRn occupancy in >95% of pregnant individuals, even with dosing delays up to 3 days. Exploratory exposure-response analyses supported 45 mg/kg for the Phase 3 HDFN study.
Humans↗
No Remdesivir Resistance Observed in the Phase 3 Severe and Moderate COVID-19 SIMPLE Trials.
Remdesivir (RDV) is a broad-spectrum nucleotide analog prodrug approved for the treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients with clinical benefit demonstrated in multiple Phase 3 trials. Here we present SARS-CoV-2 resistance analyses from the Phase 3 SIMPLE clinical studies evaluating RDV in hospitalized participants with severe or moderate COVID-19 disease. The severe and moderate studies enrolled participants with radiologic evidence of pneumonia and a room-air oxygen saturation of ≤94% or >94%, respectively. Virology sample collection was optional in the study protocols. Sequencing and related viral load data were obtained retrospectively from participants at a subset of study sites with local sequencing capabilities (10 of 183 sites) at timepoints with detectable viral load. Among participants with both baseline and post-baseline sequencing data treated with RDV, emergent Nsp12 substitutions were observed in 4 of 19 (21%) participants in the severe study and none of the 2 participants in the moderate study. The following 5 substitutions emerged: T76I, A526V, A554V, E665K, and C697F. The substitutions T76I, A526V, A554V, and C697F had an EC50 fold change of ≤1.5 relative to the wildtype reference using a SARS-CoV-2 subgenomic replicon system, indicating no significant change in the susceptibility to RDV. The phenotyping of E665K could not be determined due to a lack of replication. These data reveal no evidence of relevant resistance emergence and further confirm the established efficacy profile of RDV with a high resistance barrier in COVID-19 patients.
Humans↗
Durvalumab and tremelimumab, with or without lenvatinib, combined with transarterial chemoembolisation in participants with embolisation-eligible hepatocellular carcinoma (EMERALD-3): a global, randomised, open-label, sponsor-blinded, phase 3 study.
BACKGROUND: Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE), a standard treatment for embolisation-eligible hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), induces tumour immune responses. Single tremelimumab regular interval durvalumab (STRIDE) is a standard treatment in advanced HCC. In this phase 3 trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of STRIDE, with or without lenvatinib, plus TACE, in participants with embolisation-eligible HCC. METHODS: EMERALD-3 is a phase 3, randomised, open-label, sponsor-blinded study, conducted at 177 medical sites in 21 countries. Eligible participants were 18 years or older (aged ≥21 years in Egypt or Singapore) at screening and had confirmed HCC (by imaging or histopathologically from biopsy specimen, surgery, or both) not amenable to curative surgery, curative ablation, or transplantation but amenable to TACE. Participants had Child-Pugh class A liver function, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and at least one measurable target intrahepatic lesion per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours. Participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE, STRIDE plus TACE, or TACE until each group reached its preplanned enrolment target of 175 participants. After the STRIDE plus TACE group reached its enrolment target, randomisation was adjusted to continue in a 1:1 ratio between the STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE group and TACE group until approximately 275 participants were enrolled in each of these two groups. Randomisation used a centrally assigned interactive response technology system, stratified by region, baseline tumour burden, and previous palliative embolisation. In the STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE group, on the first day, participants were given 300 mg tremelimumab intravenously, followed by 1500 mg durvalumab plus oral lenvatinib (8 mg for <60 kg bodyweight or 12 mg for ≥60 kg bodyweight); participants then received 1500 mg durvalumab every 4 weeks plus once-daily lenvatinib for up to 36 cycles. In the STRIDE plus TACE group, participants were given 300 mg tremelimumab and 1500 mg durvalumab intravenously on the first day, followed by 1500 mg durvalumab every 4 weeks. The technique and number of TACE procedures were at the investigators' discretion, with the first procedure administered at least 7 days after the first dose of durvalumab in the two investigation treatment groups and within 7 days of random allocation in the TACE group. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE versus TACE. Key secondary endpoints were overall survival for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE versus TACE and progression-free survival and overall survival for STRIDE plus TACE versus TACE. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05301842), with enrolment completed. FINDINGS: From March 28, 2022, to Nov 20, 2024, 1124 participants were screened. The full analysis set comprised 760 participants, who were randomly allocated to STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE (n=293), STRIDE plus TACE (n=175), or TACE (n=292). 633 (83%) participants were male and 127 (17%) were female; 548 (72%) were Asian. At the first data cutoff (Sept 2, 2025); the overall median follow-up for progression-free survival was 10·0 months (IQR 4·6-17·2); median follow-up for progression-free survival was 11·0 months (IQR 4·8-18·4) for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE and 8·3 months (4·1-15·5) for TACE. Median progression-free survival was 13·0 months (95% CI 12·2-16·7) for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE versus 9·8 months (8·0-11·4) for TACE (HR 0·70 [95% CI 0·57-0·86]; p=0·0007). At the second data cutoff (Feb 23, 2026) and a median follow-up for overall survival of 24·6 months (IQR 16·5-31·5) for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE and 22·9 months (14·9-30·2) for TACE, median overall survival was 39·5 months (95% CI 34·1-not reached) for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE and 34·7 months (28·8-not reached) for TACE (HR 0·84 [95% CI 0·65-1·09]; p=0·18). At this data cutoff, median progression-free survival was 12·9 months (95% CI 10·2-15·9) for STRIDE plus TACE and 8·1 months (6·5-10·2) for the first 175 participants randomised to TACE (HR 0·71 [95% CI 0·56-0·91]), with median follow-up of 10·3 months (IQR 4·6-23·7) for STRIDE plus TACE and 7·7 months (3·0-18·5) for the first 175 participants randomly allocated to TACE. The most common adverse events of maximum grade 3 or 4 were hypertension (34 [12%] of 287) for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE, post-embolisation syndrome and anaemia (ten [6%] of 175 each) for STRIDE plus TACE, and post-embolisation (17 [6%] of 290) for TACE. 184 (64%) participants receiving STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE, 89 (51%) receiving STRIDE plus TACE, and 68 (23%) receiving TACE had serious adverse events. Treatment-related adverse events with an outcome of death during the treatment-emergent period occurred in seven (2%) of 287 participants who received STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE (two for myocarditis; and one each for hepatic failure, haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, septic shock, cardiac failure, and unknown cause), none of 175 participants who received STRIDE plus TACE, and two (1%) of 290 participants who received TACE (one each for acute myocardial infarction and unknown cause). INTERPRETATION: STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE showed a statistically significant progression-free survival improvement versus TACE. These findings support a STRIDE-based regimen as a potential new treatment option for people with embolisation-eligible HCC; additional follow-up is being conducted for final analysis of overall survival across treatment groups. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.
Adult↗
Patient-reported outcomes with tarlatamab in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer after platinum-based chemotherapy: results from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial.
BACKGROUND: Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is associated with a high symptom burden and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This prespecified analysis from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for tarlatamab versus standard-of-care (SoC) chemotherapy following first-line platinum-based therapy. METHODS: DeLLphi-304 is a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 3 study in adults with ES-SCLC. PROs were assessed using validated instruments, including the EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-LC13, FACT-G GP5, BPI-SF, and the EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale. Change from baseline, response rates, and time to deterioration in these PROs were analyzed. RESULTS: PRO data from all 509 patients enrolled were evaluated. Compliance with QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 assessments remained above 69% through 19 weeks. A higher proportion of patients receiving tarlatamab achieved symptom or functional improvement at 19 weeks compared with SoC in chest pain (19% vs 10%), cough (35% vs 26%), dyspnea (22% vs 7%), physical functioning (13% vs 8%), and global health status (23% vs 15%), respectively. Tarlatamab also delayed deterioration in symptoms, physical functioning, and pain at worst relative to SoC. FACT-G GP5 results indicated that patients receiving tarlatamab were less bothered by treatment side effects over time. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to its previously reported antitumor activity, tarlatamab demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms and HRQoL compared with SoC. These findings support a favorable benefit-risk profile of tarlatamab in patients previously treated for ES-SCLC.
Humans↗
Efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib, an oral, selective tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 52-week results from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 POETYK PsA-1 trial.
OBJECTIVES: The randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 Program fOr Evaluation of TYK2 inhibitor Psoriatic Arthritis-1 (POETYK PsA-1) trial evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of deucravacitinib, an oral, selective tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, in patients with PsA naïve to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. METHODS: Adults with active PsA, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentration ≥ 3 mg/L, and ≥ 1 PsA-related hand and/or foot erosion detectable via radiograph were randomised 1:1 to oral deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily or placebo through week (W) 16. At W16, patients continued receiving deucravacitinib or switched from placebo to deucravacitinib through W52. The primary endpoint was American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement in response (ACR20) at W16. Nonresponder imputation was used for missing data. Efficacy and safety were evaluated through W52. Post hoc rank analysis of covariance was used to evaluate structural damage with no missing data imputation. RESULTS: In 670 patients, a significantly greater proportion of those receiving deucravacitinib vs placebo achieved ACR20 at W16 (54.2% vs 34.1%, P < .001). Responses with deucravacitinib were increased at W52. Patients who switched from placebo to deucravacitinib achieved improvements similar to those in patients who received continuous deucravacitinib. Inhibition of structural damage was observed at W16 and W52. At W16, incidences of serious adverse events (AEs) (deucravacitinib, 1.8%; placebo, 2.4%) and discontinuations due to AEs (2.4%; 1.8%) were low and remained low through W52, without imbalances in cardiovascular events, malignancies, or opportunistic infections. No new safety signals were detected; no deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Deucravacitinib demonstrated superiority vs placebo for clinical responses, patient-reported outcomes, and structural damage inhibition in patients with PsA, with favourable tolerability and safety.
Humans↗
Effect of long-term sepiapterin treatment on dietary phenylalanine tolerance in patients with phenylketonuria: Interim results from the phase 3 APHENITY Extension Study.
PURPOSE: To report interim results from the ongoing, open-label, phase 3 APHENITY Extension Study (NCT05166161), evaluating long-term treatment with sepiapterin in patients with phenylketonuria. METHODS: Participants received an age-based dose of oral sepiapterin daily; those with mean blood phenylalanine (Phe) levels <360 μmol/L (<5.95 mg/dL) after 2 weeks underwent a 26-week dietary Phe tolerance assessment, wherein dietary Phe intake was adjusted and blood Phe levels monitored. Other participants continued treatment with optional diet liberalization. Primary endpoints included change from baseline to week 26 in dietary Phe intake and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: As of September 2, 2024, 169 participants received sepiapterin (median [minimum, maximum] age: 14.0 [0.2, 55.0] years, median exposure: 72.9 weeks); 102 participants underwent dietary Phe tolerance assessments. Mean (SD) dietary Phe intake increased from 27.6 (18.0) mg/kg/day at baseline to 62.5 (41.5) mg/kg/day at week 26 (least-squares mean change [SE]: 36.4 [2.8] mg/kg/day from baseline) (P < .0001 from post hoc analysis). The incidence of treatment-related TEAEs was 29.0%; 3 participants (1.8%) discontinued treatment owing to treatment-related TEAEs. There were no treatment-related serious TEAEs or deaths. CONCLUSION: Interim results support the long-term safety of sepiapterin and demonstrate the potential for diet liberalization in adults and children with phenylketonuria. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT05166161 (https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/study/NCT05166161; date of registration, December 8, 2021).
Humans↗
Efficacy and Safety of a Single-Pill Triple Combination of Valsartan, Amlodipine, and Chlorthalidone in Patients With Essential Hypertension Inadequately Controlled on Dual Therapy With Valsartan and Amlodipine: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase 3 Trial.
Many hypertensive patients require three or more antihypertensive agents to achieve target blood pressure. This randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase 3 trial conducted in South Korea evaluated the efficacy and safety of a single-pill triple combination therapy with valsartan (Val), amlodipine (Aml), and chlorthalidone (CTD) in patients whose blood pressure remained inadequately controlled on Val/Aml dual therapy. Patients uncontrolled after 4 weeks of Val/Aml 80/5 mg were randomized 1:1 to either Val/Aml/CTD 80/5/12.5 mg or Val/Aml 80/5 mg using a double-dummy design. After 2 weeks, doses were escalated to Val/Aml/CTD 160/5/25 mg or Val/Aml 160/5 mg, respectively, for a total treatment duration of 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) from baseline to week 8. Of 193 randomized patients, 178 completed the study. The least squares mean ± SE change in MSSBP was -19.70 ± 1.31 mmHg in the Val/Aml/CTD group versus -8.71 ± 1.26 mmHg in the control group, yielding a statistically significant between-group difference of -10.99 ± 1.81 mmHg (95% CI, -14.56 to -7.41; p < 0.0001). No serious adverse events occurred in the Val/Aml/CTD group, compared with an incidence of 1.98% in the control group (p = 0.4985). Triple combination therapy with Val/Aml/CTD demonstrated superior blood pressure reduction and a favorable safety profile in patients with essential hypertension inadequately controlled on Val/Aml dual therapy, supporting its use as an effective treatment option in this population. Trial Registration: This trial was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT06416865).
Humans↗
Adjuvant oxaliplatin with S-1 (SOX) versus S-1 for stage II-III gastric cancer (CAPITAL): A randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial.
BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy following D2 gastrectomy constitutes the standard-of-care for resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) carcinoma. The CAPITAL trial is a multicenter, randomized, phase 3 study, aiming to assess the efficacy and safety of adjuvant oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) versus S-1 alone. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed pathological stage II-III gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma after gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either the SOX regimen (n = 362) or the S-1 regimen (n = 362). The primary endpoint was overall survival. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01795027). FINDINGS: The median follow-up was 74.0 months (interquartile range [IQR], 35.5-89.3). The 5-year overall survival rates were 70.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66.0-76.1) in the SOX group and 62.9% (95% CI, 57.8-68.5) in the S-1 group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58-0.95; p = 0.018). The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 71.2% (95% CI, 66.5-76.3) and 66.2% (95% CI, 61.2-71.6) in the SOX group, as compared with 65.1% (95% CI, 60.2-70.5) and 55.6% (95% CI, 50.4-61.3) in the S-1 group (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61-0.96). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3-4 occurred in 87 (25%) of 349 patients in the SOX group and 45 (13%) of 347 patients in the S-1 group. The most common grade 3-4 adverse event was neutropenia, occurring in 44 (13%) of 349 patients in the SOX group and 23 (7%) of 347 patients in the S-1 group. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of adjuvant oxaliplatin to S-1 chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with gastric cancer. FUNDING: This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82573092 and 82573387).
Humans↗
Adjuvant alectinib versus chemotherapy in resected ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ALINA): health-related quality-of-life and safety outcomes from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.
BACKGROUND: For patients with resected, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), adjuvant alectinib significantly improved disease-free survival versus platinum-based chemotherapy in the global, phase 3, open-label, randomised ALINA trial. We report safety and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes from the ALINA trial. METHODS: Eligible patients aged 18 years or older with resected, ALK-positive, stage IB (≥4 cm)-IIIA NSCLC (per the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Union for International Cancer Control Cancer Staging Manual 7th edition) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 were randomly assigned (1:1) via a block-stratified randomisation method to receive oral alectinib (600 mg twice daily) for 24 months or intravenous platinum-based chemotherapy for four 3-week cycles. Randomisation was stratified according to disease stage and race. The primary endpoint, previously reported, was disease-free survival. Safety was a secondary endpoint and HRQoL was an exploratory endpoint. Safety was assessed by the investigator as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5·0 until 28 days after the last alectinib dose or chemotherapy cycle. HRQoL was assessed via the Short-Form 36-item health survey version 2 (SF-36v2) questionnaire at baseline, every 3 weeks to week 12, then every 12 weeks until disease recurrence, consent withdrawal, death, or week 96. Norm-based scoring was applied; clinically meaningful changes were defined using the SF-36v2 manual. Safety was assessed in the safety-evaluable population and HRQoL in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03456076) and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Aug 16, 2018, and Dec 8, 2021, 257 patients were assigned to receive alectinib (n=130) or chemotherapy (n=127). 123 (48%) patients were male and 134 (52%) were female; 143 (56%) were Asian. The safety-evaluable population comprised 128 patients who received alectinib and 120 patients who received chemotherapy; median duration of safety follow-up was 24·8 months (IQR 22·0-24·9) in the alectinib group and 3·7 months (IQR 3·7-3·8) in the chemotherapy group. The safety of adjuvant alectinib was generally consistent with its known profile. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were blood creatine phosphokinase increased (eight [6%] of 128), alanine aminotransferase increased (two [2%] of 128), and blood bilirubin increased (two [2%] of 128) in the alectinib group, and neutrophil count decreased (12 [10%] of 120), neutropenia (ten [8%] of 120), and nausea (five [4%] of 120) in the chemotherapy group. Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in two (2%; one each with appendicitis and pneumonitis) of 128 patients in the alectinib group and eight (7%) of 120 patients in the chemotherapy group ( most common were gastrointestinal disorders in three [3%] patients). No deaths due to adverse events were reported in either group. There were fewer discontinuations due to adverse events with alectinib (seven [5%]) versus chemotherapy (15 [13%]). A clinically meaningful difference in improvement from baseline was seen at week 12 for bodily pain, role physical, mental health, social functioning, and vitality SF-36v2 domains with alectinib; improvements in physical and mental HRQoL were maintained over 2 years of active treatment (at week 96, mean Mental Component Summary score: 49·9 [SD 10·4]; mean Physical Component Summary score: 48·8 [SD 7·2]) and reached levels similar to the general population (population norm: 50). INTERPRETATION: For patients with resected ALK-positive NSCLC, adjuvant alectinib had a manageable safety profile; HRQoL improved and was maintained over 2 years of active treatment. Together with the disease-free survival benefit seen in ALINA, these data support adjuvant alectinib as an important new standard-of-care for patients with resected ALK-positive NSCLC. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.
Adult↗
RENOIR phase 3 rituximab-lenalidomide vs rituximab as maintenance treatment in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.
Maintenance treatment in older patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) remains an area of investigation. RENOIR was a multicenter, phase 3, open-label randomized trial conducted by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) in older patients with R/R FL after 1 or 2 previous therapies. Patients achieving partial response or complete response (CR) after 4 to 6 cycles of standard rituximab (R)-based chemotherapy were randomized 1:1 to maintenance with R alone (standard arm) or R plus lenalidomide (R2; experimental arm). The primary end point was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) from randomization, with an expected hazard ratio (HR) of 0.5. A total of 152 patients (median age, 71 years) were enrolled. After induction, 129 (85%) achieved an overall response (CR, 58%) and were randomized to R (n = 65) or R2 (n = 64). At a median follow-up of 68 months, the 2-year PFS was 73% in the R2 arm and 64% in the R arm. An unplanned hypothesis-generating subgroup analysis showed a greater 2-year PFS benefit with R2 in patients aged <70 years: R2, 96% vs R, 69%. Two-year overall survival rates were similar (R2, 80% vs R, 89%). Grade 3/4 adverse events were more frequent in R2, mainly neutropenia and gastrointestinal disorders. In conclusion, the primary end point of the study was not met, and R2 maintenance did not significantly improve 2-year PFS in older patients with R/R FL, although a numerical benefit was observed. R2 showed a more favorable benefit-risk profile in patients aged <70 years, whereas in older patients careful consideration of individual tolerability is warranted. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02390869.
Humans↗
Phase 3 Trial of Oral Infigratinib in Children with Achondroplasia.
BACKGROUND: Achondroplasia is a genetic skeletal condition caused by FGFR3 pathogenic variants. Infigratinib, an oral FGFR1-3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, down-regulates key pathways in the pathogenesis of achondroplasia. METHODS: In this phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned children with achondroplasia (3 to 17 years of age) in a 2:1 ratio to receive infigratinib (at a dose of 0.25 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo once daily for 52 weeks. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the annualized height velocity in the infigratinib group as compared with the placebo group at week 52. Key secondary end points were the change from baseline in the height z score and in the upper-to-lower body segment ratio at week 52. The primary analysis evaluated the treatment effect at week 52 in the full analysis population, with missing data handled with a prespecified imputation approach. RESULTS: In all, 114 patients underwent randomization: 75 patients to receive infigratinib (with 1 withdrawal before treatment) and 39 patients to receive placebo. The difference between infigratinib and placebo in the least-squares mean change from baseline to week 52 was 1.74 cm per year (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31 to 2.17; P<0.001) for the annualized height velocity, 0.32 (96% CI, 0.23 to 0.41; P<0.001) for the height z score, and -0.02 (96% CI, -0.06 to 0.01) for the upper-to-lower body segment ratio. Adverse events occurred in 71 of 74 patients (96%) in the infigratinib group and in 37 of 39 patients (95%) in the placebo group; serious adverse events occurred in 4 of 74 patients (5%) and 1 of 39 patients (3%), respectively. No serious adverse events or adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were considered by the investigator to be related to infigratinib or placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In children with achondroplasia, treatment with once-daily oral infigratinib for 52 weeks resulted in a significantly greater increase from baseline in the annualized height velocity than placebo. (Funded by BridgeBio Pharma; PROPEL 3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT06164951; EudraCT number, 2023-506130-67.).
Adolescent↗
Daily low-dose carboplatin or weekly carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel for concurrent chemoradiotherapy in older patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (JCOG1914): A randomized phase 3 trial.
BACKGROUND: Daily low-dose carboplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy is the standard treatment for older patients with unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) in Japan. METHODS: This open-label phase 3 trial was conducted at 38 institutions in Japan. Patients aged ≥ 75 years with LA-NSCLC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive daily carboplatin (30 mg/m2) or weekly carboplatin (area under the curve, 2 mg·min/mL) plus nab-paclitaxel (30 mg/m2) with thoracic radiotherapy. Durvalumab maintenance therapy was recommended after treatment completion. The primary endpoint was overall survival, which was used to assess the non-inferiority of weekly carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel compared to daily low-dose carboplatin. RESULTS: From December 2020 to March 2024, 124 patients were enrolled (carboplatin arm, 61 and carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel arm, 63). In the planned interim analysis, the Bayesian predictive probability indicating the non-inferiority of carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel compared with carboplatin in the final analysis was 8.0%, leading to early study termination for futility. The median overall survival was not estimable in the carboplatin arm; the estimated value in the carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel arm was 26.1 months (hazard ratio, 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-3.11; p = 0.200). Two treatment-related and seven non-cancer-related deaths occurred in the carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel arm. Patients in the carboplatin arm had better quality of life than those in the carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel arm at 6 weeks (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.81; p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Daily low-dose carboplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy remains the standard treatment for older patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC in Japan.
Humans↗
Safety and Tolerability of Oral Islatravir Once Monthly as Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in Cisgender Men and Transgender Women Who Have an Elevated Likelihood of HIV-1 Exposure: Results From the IMPOWER-24 Randomized Phase 3 Study.
BACKGROUND: Islatravir once monthly (qm), a nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor with a long half-life, was evaluated for safety and tolerability in cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men and are at increased likelihood of HIV-1 (HIV) exposure. METHODS: IMPOWER-24 (NCT04652700) was a double-blind, Phase 3 study. Participants were randomized 2:1 to islatravir 60 mg oral qm or emtricitabine (FTC; 200 mg) coformulated with either tenofovir disoproxil (245 mg) or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF; 25 mg) once daily (qd). After ∼9 months, blinded islatravir was discontinued due to lymphocyte reductions; participants were offered open-label comparator for 20 months. RESULTS: In total, 494 participants were enrolled (328 islatravir; 166 comparator): 91.5% were cisgender men, 41.7% were White, and median age was 27 years. Mean blinded dosing duration was 4.7 months (islatravir) versus 4.3 months (comparator). Overall, 211 participants (64.3%) in the islatravir group and 128 (77.1%) in the comparator group had ≥1 adverse event (AE). Most AEs were mild or moderate, with 1 AE leading to product discontinuation (islatravir; gastroesophageal reflux). Serious AEs occurred in <2%; none were related to study product. Change in total lymphocytes in the islatravir group at Month 3 was -7.4%; a trend toward recovery was observed after islatravir was stopped. Mean total lymphocytes remained within normal range. No HIV infections occurred in either group during the double-blind phase. CONCLUSIONS: Islatravir qm was generally well tolerated; decreases in total lymphocytes were observed with islatravir. Original primary efficacy objectives were not assessed due to early study stoppage.
Humans↗
Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Upadacitinib Among Patients in East Asia With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Post Hoc Subanalysis of Randomized Phase 3 Studies.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Upadacitinib, a selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, is approved to treat moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). This post hoc subanalysis evaluated the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of upadacitinib in patients in East Asia. METHODS: U-ACHIEVE (UC1; NCT02819635) and U-ACCOMPLISH (UC2; NCT03653026) were Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, induction studies evaluating upadacitinib 45 mg or placebo daily in adults with moderately to severely active UC. Clinical responders to 8 weeks of upadacitinib induction were eligible to receive upadacitinib 15 mg, upadacitinib 30 mg, or placebo daily in the 52-week U-ACHIEVE maintenance study (UC3; NCT02819635). Efficacy outcomes, safety, and pharmacokinetics were evaluated among East Asian patients. RESULTS: A higher proportion of East Asian patients achieved clinical remission with upadacitinib than placebo at induction Week 8 (UC1: n = 127, 31.4% vs. 7.3%; UC2: n = 114, 31.2% vs. 2.7%) and maintenance Week 52 (UC3: n = 184, upadacitinib 15 mg, 52.4%; upadacitinib 30 mg, 53.8%; placebo, 10.7%). Rates of endoscopic outcomes were higher with upadacitinib than with placebo across studies. No new safety signals were identified. Herpes zoster occurrences were low (UC1 and UC2: upadacitinib 45 mg, two events [in one patient]; placebo, zero events; UC3: upadacitinib 15 mg, five events; upadacitinib 30 mg, eight events; placebo, zero events). Pharmacokinetics and trends in the relationship between upadacitinib exposure and efficacy were consistent in the East Asian and global populations. CONCLUSION: Upadacitinib was generally well tolerated and effective for treating moderately to severely active UC in patients in East Asia, with a favorable benefit-risk profile consistent with the global population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02819635, NCT03653026.
Humans↗