Preoperative education and the informed patient.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of preoperative analgesic education on postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores, and patient satisfaction with analgesia. BACKGROUND: Effective postoperative pain management is crucial for patient recovery and satisfaction, yet opioid use poses risks of tolerance and addiction. Preoperative patient education offers a potential avenue to mitigate opioid reliance and improve pain management outcomes. METHODS: This single-center randomized trial was conducted at the Cleveland Clinic Main Campus between October 2021 and October 2023. Adult patients scheduled for hip arthroplasty or laparoscopic-assisted abdominal surgery with an ASA physical status of 1 to 4 were eligible. Patients with a history of prolonged opioid use, planned regional block or epidural analgesia, or limited English fluency were excluded. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either an analgesic educational video or a generic video about surgery and hospitalization. The primary outcome was opioid consumption during the initial 72 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included time-weighted average pain scores and patient satisfaction with analgesia. RESULTS: Among 957 analyzed patients, preoperative analgesic education did not significantly reduce opioid consumption (adjusted ratio of geometric means, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.86-1.18; P =0.890) or improve pain scores (adjusted mean difference, -0.1; 95% CI, -0.3 to 0.2; P =0.617). Patient satisfaction scores also did not differ significantly between groups (adjusted mean difference, -0.1; 95% CI, -0.3 to 0.2; P = 0.611). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative analgesic education did not result in clinically meaningful reductions in opioid consumption or improvements in pain management outcomes. Further research may explore more intensive educational interventions to optimize postoperative pain management strategies.
Data-gathering instruments were used in a randomized controlled trial, designed to assess a structured preoperative educational program for elective surgical patients. The key dependent variable was the physical functional capacity of patients following surgery. Questionnaires were developed to measure physical functioning in the immediate postoperative period, after discharge from hospital, and 10 days and 33 days after surgery. Statistical techniques used to measure interobserver agreement and bias were worker's chi square, Cicchett's statistic, the contingency coefficient, Kendall's Taub, and Kendall's coefficient of concordance W. The standardized questionnaires permitted classification of patients's postoperative physical functions with results that agreed highly with the classification done by experienced clinicians who cared for the same patients.
A review of the literature concerning patients who have received permanently implanted cardiac pacemakers indicates that a substantial number of these patients experience difficulties in adjusting to their medical condition. Common feelings among these patients are anxiety and depression. It is suggested that difficulties often arise from the patient's misconceptions about the pacemaker and inadequate psychosocial support. To assist such patients in their adjustment, the Pacemaker Support Program was developed to provide psychosocial counseling and pacemaker education from the preoperative phase through to the outpatient pacemaker follow-up clinic phase. In the year of the program's operation a marked decline in adjustment problems has been observed, the program has been readily integrated into the hospital routine, and it has been enthusiastically accepted by both the hospital staff and the patients.
We performed a prospective study on 10 boys between 2 and 6 years old undergoing repair for hypospadias. Clinical observation in the hospital ward rooms and play environment demonstrated a distinctive postoperative course of withdrawal and aggressive behavior with resultant increased parental anxiety, which results in strained staff-family relations. We speculate that this distinctive behavior may be owing to an interaction among parental attitudes, the pain and immobilization from operation and the level of the child's sexual development. Intervention was designed to give the boys behavioral outlets and to involve their family in preoperative and postoperative education.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the role of virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR) in neurosurgical education and training. DESIGN: Systematic review conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. SETTING: A comprehensive search was performed across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for English-language studies published between 1 January 2020 and 30 April 2026. PARTICIPANTS: Studies involving neurosurgeons, fellows, residents, and medical students (maximum sample size: n = 48) were included. RESULTS: Of 7,204 initially identified studies, 25 met the inclusion criteria. VR was primarily used for surgical simulation (100% of VR studies) and anatomical education (62.5%). AR demonstrated broader applications, including preoperative planning (40%) and intraoperative support (30%). MR was evenly distributed across simulation, planning, and intraoperative support (40% each). The most frequently improved outcomes were training effectiveness (52%) and technical proficiency (44%). Methodological quality scores, assessed using the Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MMERSQI), ranged from 39.5 to 84.5, indicating varied rigor. CONCLUSION: VR, AR, and MR technologies show potential to enhance surgical precision, technical skills, and educational outcomes in neurosurgical training. However, standardization of methodologies and cost-effective solutions remain essential. Future research should focus on long-term clinical impact and integration of AI-driven training models.