SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “robotics”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Delphi study robot consenso: Strategies for the implementation of robotic surgery in general surgery in the Spanish hospital network.

INTRODUCTION: The implementation of robotic surgery in public hospitals presents multiple logistical, educational, and organizational challenges. In the absence of unified guidelines, a national consensus is required to optimize its safe and efficient adoption. This study aimed to establish a set of consensus-based and measurable recommendations for the implementation of robotic surgery programs in hospitals within the Spanish National Health System, based on the experience of centres with established robotic programs and intended to serve as guidance for hospitals that are initiating or planning their implementation. METHODS: A national Delphi study was conducted with the participation of robotic surgery experts from 26 public hospitals. The expert panel was composed exclusively of digestive surgeons with experience in robotic surgery. Three iterative rounds of expert panel evaluation were conducted between March 2024 and March 2025. The questions were grouped into five thematic blocks. Consensus was defined as an agreement level of ≥66.7%. Kendall's W coefficient was used to assess concordance. RESULTS: High levels of consensus were achieved on key aspects related to infrastructure, structured training, cost evaluation, and quality assurance mechanisms. Areas of disagreement were also identified, such as the need for a dedicated anaesthesiologist, purchase of accessory instruments during the initial phase, and official accreditation pathways. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a guideline for developing a national robotic surgery strategy focused on patient safety, program sustainability, and standardized training of surgical teams. These recommendations can guide hospitals at different stages of robotic technology adoption. Given that the consensus was reached from an exclusively surgical perspective, the recommendations focus on patient safety, program sustainability, and standardized training of the surgical team, and should be interpreted in an adaptable manner according to each centre's context, case volume, and available resources.

Cirugía Asistida por Robot↗

PubMed1990

Development of a laboratory robotic system for automated bioanalytical methods--I. The determination of theophylline in human plasma: a comparison between the robotized and manual method.

The quality of bioanalytical methods is often determined by the quality of sample preparation. Using a robot for sample treatment may give better results than manual sample preparation, since the robot lacks human behaviour and incidental errors that are part of it. The use of a laboratory robot has the additional advantage of giving each sample the same analytical history, resulting in better reproducibility. An automated method has been developed for the analysis of drugs in plasma using a laboratory robot. Theophylline was used as a probe drug. Sample preparation was automated with a Zymate II robot, followed by separation and quantitation on an HPLC-system. The robotic method showed a good correlation with the manual method, while sample throughput was doubled.

Chemistry, Clinical↗

PubMed1990

Development of a laboratory robotic system for automated bioanalytical methods--II. A robot computer program for guarding totally automated bioanalytical methods.

The application of fully automated, unattended sample preparation performed by a laboratory robot for the analysis of drugs in biological samples requires the prevention of system failures which may arise in the on-line coupled chromatographic system or in other components of the robotic system. A computer program has been developed which can help to detect such problems. The control program for the robotic sample preparation contains a number of safety measures to intercept robotic or human errors. A routine is implemented, guarding for chromatographic malfunctions and errors in dispensing liquids by the robot. After detection of trouble, sample preparation is interrupted.

Algorithms↗

PubMed1991

Worker selection of safe speed and idle condition in simulated monitoring of two industrial robots.

Industrial robots often operate at high speed, with unpredictable motion patterns and erratic idle times. Serious injuries and deaths have occurred due to operator misperception of these robot design and performance characteristics. The main objective of the research project was to study human perceptual aspects of hazardous robotics workstations. Two laboratory experiments were designed to investigate workers' perceptions of two industrial robots with different physical configurations and performance capabilities. Twenty-four subjects participated in the study. All subjects were chosen from local industries, and had had considerable exposure to robots and other automated equipment in their working experience. Experiment 1 investigated the maximum speed of robot arm motions that workers, who were experienced with operation of industrial robots, judged to be 'safe' for monitoring tasks. It was found that the selection of safe speed depends on the size of the robot and the speed with which the robot begins its operation. Speeds of less than 51 cm/s and 63 cm/s for large and small robots, respectively, were perceived as safe, i.e., ones that did not result in workers feeling uneasy or endangered when working in close proximity to the robot and monitoring its actions. Experiment 2 investigated the minimum value of robot idle time (inactivity) perceived by industrial workers as system malfunction, and an indication of the 'safe-to-approach' condition. It was found that idle times of 41 s and 28 s or less for the small and large robots, respectively, were perceived by workers to be a result of system malfunction. About 20% of the workers waited only 10 s or less before deciding that the robot had stopped because of system malfunction. The idle times were affected by the subjects' prior exposure to a simulated robot accident. Further interpretations of the results and suggestions for operational limitations of robot systems are discussed.

Accidents, Occupational↗

PubMed1991

Laboratory systems integration: robotics and automation.

Robotic technology is going to have a profound impact on the clinical laboratory of the future. Faced with increased pressure to reduce health care spending yet increase services to patients, many laboratories are looking for alternatives to the inflexible or "fixed" automation found in many clinical analyzers. Robots are being examined by many clinical pathologists as an attractive technology which can adapt to the constant changes in laboratory testing. Already, laboratory designs are being altered to accommodate robotics and automated specimen processors. However, the use of robotics and computer intelligence in the clinical laboratory is still in its infancy. Successful examples of robotic automation exist in several laboratories. Investigators have used robots to automate endocrine testing, high performance liquid chromatography, and specimen transportation. Large commercial laboratories are investigating the use of specimen processors which combine the use of fixed automation and robotics. Robotics have also reduced the exposure of medical technologists to specimens infected with viral pathogens. The successful examples of clinical robotics applications were a result of the cooperation of clinical chemists, engineers, and medical technologists. At the University of Virginia we have designed and implemented a robotic critical care laboratory. Initial clinical experience suggests that robotic performance is reliable, however, staff acceptance and utilization requires continuing education. We are also developing a robotic cyclosporine which promises to greatly reduce the labor costs of this analysis. The future will bring lab wide automation that will fully integrate computer artificial intelligence and robotics. Specimens will be transported by mobile robots. Specimen processing, aliquotting, and scheduling will be automated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Artificial Intelligence↗

PubMed1991

International Federation of Clinical Chemistry. The expanding role of robotics in the clinical laboratory.

Increasing numbers of robots are going to be employed industrial chemical laboratories. Most of these will be used to reduce the monotonous tasks of sample preparation, to minimize human exposure to dangerous environments or to carry out huge numbers of repetitive experimental procedures. For example, looking for the most effective condition or combination in chemical synthesis or the best microorganism in a large number of cultures. In the clinical laboratory the situation is slightly different and robotics is not so widely applied in clinical laboratories, but there is a definite trend to employ robots or robotic systems both to reduce labor volume and exposure of employees to possible biohazards and to help get more precise and correct results. These needs will be hard to fulfill via the usual automated devices and especially when adequate devices are not available. Specially designed machines will have to be produced to satisfy these demands and robotics will play a part. Finally we need to evaluate the effectivity of introduction of robotics in terms of economy, strategy, biosafety and other aspects. Typical examples of implementation of robotics in the clinical laboratory are transportation of specimens, front-end automation of sample preparation, separation and aliquotting as well as selected processes in a large scale automation systems. As described previously, robots that are commercially available now, are not intelligent enough to be easily handled by personnel who are not trained for robotics. There is a need for personnel dedicated to robotics who join the project from the very beginning of the plan and who can maintain the system properly.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Chemistry, Clinical↗

PubMed1985

Exploring user acceptance of a robotic arm: an aesthetic orientation.

An industrial robotic arm has been programmed for use by quadriplegics, as a personal assistant in a rehabilitative setting. This case study is an investigation of the acceptance of this device by disabled individuals who may be likely to use the robot in an actual home or work setting. The use and acceptance of assistive devices have been a significant problem in the utilization of these instruments. An assessment of attitudinal changes of selected quadriplegics in response to the presentation of two orientation programs on the use of a robotic arm was the focus of this project. One program included a discussion of aesthetic sequences of robotic movement, industrial design, and kinetic art. In contrast, the other program presented the "standard" introduction to the robotic arm which involves utilitarian sequences of robotic movement. A robotics questionnaire was administered to both groups before and after the treatment operations. A follow-up study has been conducted. One of the subjects participating in the aesthetic treatment was part of this experiment which followed the posttest. The subject in the follow-up study was trained to use the Robotic Aid for utilitarian tasks. The questionnaire was readministered to this individual in a post-posttest. The whole study can be conceived of as series of investigations of the hypothesis that aesthetic movement of a robotic arm can affect an individual's attitude toward the acceptance and use of robots. As a piece of exploratory research, this case study does not reveal conclusive evidence to support the hypothesis.

Arm↗

PubMed1989

Robotics in biomedical chromatography and electrophoresis.

The ideal laboratory robot can be viewed as "an indefatigable assistant capable of working continuously for 24 h a day with constant efficiency". The development of a system approaching that promise requires considerable skill and time commitment, a thorough understanding of the capabilities and limitations of the robot and its specialized modules and an intimate knowledge of the functions to be automated. The robot need not emulate every manual step. Effective substitutes for difficult steps must be devised. The future of laboratory robots depends not only on technological advances in other fields, but also on the skill and creativity of chromatographers and other scientists. The robot has been applied to automate numerous biomedical chromatography and electrophoresis methods. The quality of its data can approach, and in some cases exceed, that of manual methods. Maintaining high data quality during continuous operation requires frequent maintenance and validation. Well designed robotic systems can yield substantial increase in the laboratory productivity without a corresponding increase in manpower. They can free skilled personnel from mundane tasks and can enhance the safety of the laboratory environment. The integration of robotics, chromatography systems and laboratory information management systems permits full automation and affords opportunities for unattended method development and for future incorporation of artificial intelligence techniques and the evolution of expert systems. Finally, humanoid attributes aside, robotic utilization in the laboratory should not be an end in itself. The robot is a useful tool that should be utilized only when it is prudent and cost-effective to do so.

Chemistry, Clinical↗

PubMed1988

Robotics in the clinical laboratory.

We are beginning to see the potential of robotics in the clinical laboratory through integration with automated analyzers and computer systems. However, there is a need for training programs that will prepare technologists to design and implement robotic systems for clinical laboratories. What will the robot laboratory of the future look like? We will see hospital laboratories begin to be located some distance away from the main facility because the labor component of staffing satellite laboratories will have been greatly reduced. Instrument manufacturers will see the need for analyzers that are robot-friendly and allow for simplified interfacing, both electronic and mechanical. Robots will become more versatile even to the point of performing complete instrument repair. Laboratories will be equipped with many task-oriented robotic stations, including, for example, accessioning and processing robots that prepare samples for transport by robotic carts. Analysis will be performed by a combination of robot and dedicated analyzer. Laboratory results will be reviewed by algorithms in the larger laboratory computer, which will alert the laboratory worker to unusual results. A large variety of analyses will be available to the patient with rapid turnaround. The end result will be more efficient health care delivery at reduced cost.

Computer Communication Networks↗

PubMed2026

Post-operative pain, nausea, vomiting and optic nerve sheath diameter following total intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia for adults undergoing robotic transabdominal surgery - a systematic review and meta- analysis.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of robotic-assisted abdominal surgery is aimed at reducing the primary and secondary adverse outcomes. Anesthesia in robotic surgery varies from anesthesia for open or laparoscopic surgical procedures. The choice of anesthesia influences the perioperative control of pain, nausea, vomiting, and Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). The purpose of this systematic review was to assess outcome variation in patients undergoing transabdominal robot-assisted surgery done under total intravenous anesthesia or inhalational anesthesia. METHODOLOGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and Google Scholar (January, 2017 to June, 2024). Search terms included "Anesthesia", "Robotics", "prostatectomy", hysterectomy", "nephrectomy", "cholecystectomy" and "cystectomy" with the Boolean operators "AND" and "OR". We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including adults of both genders aged 18 years and above, who underwent transabdominal robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery and targeting the consequences related to TIVA or inhalational anesthesia. We reviewed titles and abstracts and proceeded to full-text articles of the eligible studies relevant to inclusion criteria. Mean and standard deviations with 95% CI were calculated. Forest plots were used to present data visually. RESULTS: Six studies (340 patients) were included. We found only one study in which post-operative pain was assessed and results favored intravenous anesthesia in robotic transabdominal surgery. Only two studies reported post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Both studies stated that PONV is reported in few patients in the inhalation anesthesia group. We found evidence suggesting that change in ONSD measurements at 10 min after induction (MD 0.04,95% CI -0.02 to 0.11 p = 0.19) and 40-60 min after Trendelenburg position (MD -0.26, 95% CI -0.34 to 0.17, p = 0.16) are much less in intravenous anesthesia group than in inhalation anesthesia group. Total intravenous anesthesia maintains the ONSD and hence the ICP better than inhalational anesthesia in robotic transabdominal surgery with CO2 pneumoperitoneum in Trendelenburg positioning requirements. It would be a safer choice than inhalational anesthesia due to fewer adverse events. CONCLUSION: This review concludes that TIVA is a better choice than inhalational anesthesia for transabdominal robotic-assisted surgery in urology, gynecology, and gastroenterology in both male and female patients.

Humans↗

PubMed1989

Robotic system for i.v. antineoplastic drug preparation: description and preliminary evaluation under simulated conditions.

A robotic system for preparing doses of i.v. antineoplastic drugs is described, and measurements made with the system are compared for accuracy and reproducibility with those made by pharmacists and technicians. System hardware consists of a robotic arm, a 16-bit microcomputer, a bar-code reader, a voice synthesizer, and an electronic balance. The software includes a menu-driven main program, executable files for each robotic activity, and an interface to allow control to pass between the program and the files. The program has routines for matching the software to the hardware; for entering information about the patient, the name of the drug ordered, and the dose; for checking the dose; for selecting the number and size of the vials to be used; for specifying the manipulations of the robotic arm; for printing labels; and for maintaining records. The robot fills an order by getting and placing a vial, inserting a needle into it and withdrawing the drug, weighing the vial, agitating the container to dissolve its contents, reading a bar code, placing a syringe in a syringe manipulator, and getting an i.v. container and injecting the drug into it. Detection of any errors by a series of self-checks arrests execution of an order. No significant differences in accuracy and precision were found between the robotic system and humans performing the same tasks under simulated conditions. The robotic system required less time than humans and eliminated the possibility of direct human contact with the i.v. admixture. Under simulated conditions, a robotic system developed to assist in the preparation of i.v. antineoplastic drugs was as accurate as a manual system and was more time efficient.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2026

Robotic Needle Insertion for CT-guided Percutaneous Biopsy of Thoracoabdominal Lesions: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Trial.

Purpose To compare safety and feasibility between a novel CT-guided robotic system and the conventional freehand technique for puncture biopsy of thoracoabdominal lesions. Materials and Methods In this prospective multicenter randomized trial, individuals with suspected lesions were enrolled between July 2023 and April 2024 across three university teaching hospitals and randomized to the robot-assisted group (n = 82) or the freehand group (n = 83). Procedure outcomes included the technical success rate, targeting error, number of CT scans and needle adjustments, puncture time, and complications. Descriptive and inferential statistics were calculated. Results A total of 165 participants (mean age, 60 years ± 10 [SD]; 83 male) were included. Compared with the freehand group, the robot-assisted group demonstrated a higher technical success rate (97.56% [80 of 82] vs 62.65% [52 of 83], P < .001), lower targeting error (mean Euclidean deviation: 1.7 mm ± 1.1 vs 4.5 mm ± 3.9, P < .001), and fewer CT scans (mean, 4.3 ± 1.9 vs 5.2 ± 2.3; P = .002) and needle adjustments (mean, 0.7 ± 0.7 vs 1.6 ± 1.6; P = .003). Despite differences in geometric precision, both groups achieved 100% (82 of 82 and 83 of 83) diagnostic yield. The median puncture time was comparable between groups (5.5 minutes ± 4.3 vs 4.8 minutes ± 7.0, P = .50). During lung biopsies, the robot-assisted approach yielded fewer complications compared with the freehand approach (4.88% [four of 82] vs 16.87% [14 of 83], P = .014). Conclusion Compared with the freehand approach, robot-assisted biopsy yielded greater precision and reduced adjustments and complications while demonstrating noninferior diagnostic efficacy and comparable duration. Keywords: Robotic Needle Insertion, Biopsy, Thoracoabdominal Lesions, Robot-assisted Biopsy, CT-guided Intervention, Percutaneous Needle Biopsy, Randomized Controlled Trial, Algorithm Development, CT, Clinical Testing, Interventional-Body, Biopsy/Needle Aspiration, Percutaneous, Thorax, Abdomen/GI, Liver, Lung, Kidney ©RSNA, 2026.

Humans↗

PubMed1986

Robots in food systems: a review and assessment of potential uses.

Management personnel in foodservice, food processing, and robot industries were surveyed to evaluate potential job functions for robots in the food industry. The survey instrument listed 64 different food-related job functions that participants were asked to assess as appropriate or not appropriate for robotic implementation. Demographic data were collected from each participant to determine any positive or negative influence on job function responses. The survey responses were statistically evaluated using frequencies and the chi-square test of significance. Sixteen of the 64 job functions were identified as appropriate for robot implementation in food industries by both robot manufacturing and food managers. The study indicated, first, that food managers lack knowledge about robots and robot manufacturing managers lack knowledge about food industries. Second, robots are not currently being used to any extent in the food industry. Third, analysis of the demographic data in relation to the 16 identified job functions showed no significant differences in responses.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Robotic surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review.

Robotic surgery is used for selected gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs), particularly when location makes conventional wedge resection difficult. We synthesised technical, perioperative, pathological, functional and oncological outcomes. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 14 August 2026. Primary reports with at least three eligible robotic gastric-GIST patients were included. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and completed design-specific JBI appraisal. Because outcome definitions, denominators and reporting were heterogeneous, findings were synthesised narratively in accordance with SWiM guidance rather than pooled. Twenty-three studies, including six comparative cohorts, were included. Institutional robotic cohorts contained 3-45 eligible patients; one national registry included 1,567 robotic cases. Tumour size ranged from 2.68 ± 1.55 to 7.9 ± 1.8 cm among studies reporting means. Most institutional reports described R0 resection in all eligible patients; exceptions were 23/24 and 24/25, while the registry reported 1,425/1,567 R0 resections. Grade III morbidity occurred in 2/25 patients in one function-preserving series. Registry 30- and 90-day mortality after robotic resection were 0.5% and 0.8%, respectively. Comparative studies did not demonstrate superior postoperative or oncological outcomes with robotic surgery. Robotic gastric-GIST resection appears feasible in selected patients and may facilitate organ-preserving surgery at anatomically challenging sites. Current observational evidence does not establish comparative functional, oncological or economic superiority.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Artificial intelligence enabled social robotic interventions (PARO) in Australian dementia care: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although there is a growing body of research indicating that Personal Robot/Social Robot could be used in various aspects of care for individuals with dementia, little is known about how well these types of interventions work in an actual hospital setting in Australia. AIMS & OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the effectiveness of PARO-based socially assistive robotic intervention in terms of its effectiveness outcomes towards the reduction of dementia-related behavioural and psychological symptoms in Australian based healthcare settings. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across five electronic databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library, to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating PARO-based socially assistive robotic interventions for dementia in Australian healthcare settings. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251251916) and followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. In addition, the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2) was used to evaluate the risk of bias across all studies. Pooled standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for agitation, anxiety, and depression. Heterogeneity across studies was evaluated using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: Six RCTs involving 1444 participants were identified for inclusion in this review. AI-enabled socially assistive robotic interventions, specifically the PARO therapeutic robot, significantly reduced agitation and anxiety when compared to standard treatment or control conditions. The pooled analysis showed that agitation [SMD = -0.44 (95 % CI: -0.70, -0.18) p = 0.0008] and anxiety [SMD = -0.59 (95 % CI: -0.91, -0.27) p = 0.0003] were reduced significantly, while the decrease in depression [SMD = -0.44 (95 % CI: -0.95, -0.07) p = 0.09] scores was non-significant among dementia patients receiving PARO-based socially assistive robotic interventions as compared to the control. The overall risk of bias across all six studies was considered low to moderate. CONCLUSION: PARO-based socially assistive robotic interventions may provide preliminary evidence of effectiveness in reducing agitation and anxiety in individuals with dementia in Australian healthcare, but the evidence regarding the reduction of depression remains unclear. Therefore, additional high-quality trials with consistent methodology and extended follow-up will be necessary to determine both the short-term and long-term clinical efficacy and practicality of implementing these interventions into practice.

Humans↗

PubMed1990

Robotic transportation.

Mobile robots perform fetch-and-carry tasks autonomously. An intelligent, sensor-equipped mobile robot does not require dedicated pathways or extensive facility modification. In the hospital, mobile robots can be used to carry specimens, pharmaceuticals, meals, etc. between supply centers, patient areas, and laboratories. The HelpMate (Transitions Research Corp.) mobile robot was developed specifically for hospital environments. To reach a desired destination, Help-Mate navigates with an on-board computer that continuously polls a suite of sensors, matches the sensor data against a pre-programmed map of the environment, and issues drive commands and path corrections. A sender operates the robot with a user-friendly menu that prompts for payload insertion and desired destination(s). Upon arrival at its selected destination, the robot prompts the recipient for a security code or physical key and awaits acknowledgement of payload removal. In the future, the integration of HelpMate with robot manipulators, test equipment, and central institutional information systems will open new applications in more localized areas and should help overcome difficulties in filling transport staff positions.

Hospital Departments↗

PubMed1990

Laboratory robotics and artificial intelligence.

Intelligent robots, which incorporate artificial intelligence in their controlling software, are the next step in bringing the laboratory robot to its full potential. The areas currently under study in our laboratory are improved user interfaces for laboratory robotics, the integration of object-oriented databases into robot control programs, and strategies to optimize multi-step procedures. The ultimate goal of this work is the Standard Robotics Method. The Standard Robotics Method we envision would allow a robotic method to be transferred from one laboratory to another.

Artificial Intelligence↗

PubMed2026

Robot-assisted versus freehand cannulated-screw fixation for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review of technical, clinical and adoption outcomes.

Robot-assisted guidance may improve the technical precision of percutaneous cannulated-screw fixation for femoral neck fractures. Whether these procedural advantages translate into better clinical outcomes remains uncertain. We compared robot-assisted and conventional freehand fixation in adults with femoral neck fractures. MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL were searched from inception to 15 July 2026 without language restrictions. Google Scholar was used only as a supplementary search source, together with forward and backward citation searching. Comparative studies of robot-assisted versus freehand fluoroscopy-guided cannulated-screw fixation were included. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I, with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale used as a complementary appraisal of non-randomised studies. Random-effects meta-analyses included prediction intervals and prespecified sensitivity analyses. The protocol was registered prospectively (PROSPERO CRD420261465038). Sixteen comparative studies involving 1,293 participants were included. Of these, 597 underwent robot-assisted fixation and 696 underwent freehand fixation. Two studies reporting random allocation and 14 non-randomised studies were included in the study. Robot-assisted fixation was associated with fewer guide-wire manipulations, greater screw-placement accuracy and 13.9 fewer fluoroscopic acquisitions per procedure (95% confidence interval [CI] -20.3 to -7.5). Earlier radiographic healing and modestly higher final Harris Hip Scores were also observed. Pooled estimates suggested lower risks of union failure, avascular necrosis and composite complications. Fluoroscopy duration, overall operative time and reoperation did not differ significantly. Heterogeneity was substantial for several continuous outcomes, with prediction intervals crossing the null for several estimates, indicating that the magnitude of benefit varied considerably between studies. Some clinical associations were also sensitive to eligibility-restricted analyses. Robot-assisted cannulated-screw fixation improves technical execution compared with freehand fixation. Patient-important clinical superiority and economic value have not been established, and evidence concerning learning curves, operator acceptability and system reliability remains insufficient. Current evidence does not support routine widespread adoption; adequately powered multicentre randomised trials incorporating economic and implementation evaluation are required.

Humans↗