SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “screw placement accuracy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Safety and Stability of a Combined C2 Screw Placement Strategy With Vertebral Artery Mobilization.

BACKGROUND: Although C2 pedicle screws are considered the gold standard for atlantoaxial fixation, the optimal fixation strategy for patients with high-riding vertebral arteries (HRVA) or narrow C2 pedicles (NC2P) remains controversial because of the increased risk of vertebral artery injury and the limitations of alternative fixation techniques. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, stability, and clinical efficacy of an individualized C2 screw fixation strategy incorporating vertebral artery mobilization for complex upper cervical anatomy. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in 312 patients who underwent C2 fixation between 2017 and 2025. Patients were categorized according to fusion method, screw laterality, and VA transposition requirement. Bone fusion rates and screw accuracy (Gertzbein-Robbins grading) were compared across groups using χ2, Fisher's exact, and multivariate logistic regression analyses to control confounders. RESULTS: All procedures were successfully completed without permanent neurovascular injury. At 6 months, the fusion rate with an atlantoaxial fusion cage was significantly higher than with interlaminar bone grafting (92.3% vs. 51.0%, p < 0.001). Unilateral C2 pedicle screw fixation combined with a contralateral alternative screw achieved comparable stability to bilateral fixation (p > 0.05). Screw placement accuracy was 100% clinically acceptable in normal anatomy and 60% in cases requiring VA mobilization, with no VA injury or blood flow compromise. CONCLUSION: The proposed multi-strategy C2 screw placement protocol-integrating fusion cage support and VA mobilization-achieves superior fusion, reliable fixation, and high safety, even in anatomically challenging conditions. This approach provides a reproducible and versatile solution for C2 instrumentation in complex craniovertebral junction surgery.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Robot-assisted versus freehand cannulated-screw fixation for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review of technical, clinical and adoption outcomes.

Robot-assisted guidance may improve the technical precision of percutaneous cannulated-screw fixation for femoral neck fractures. Whether these procedural advantages translate into better clinical outcomes remains uncertain. We compared robot-assisted and conventional freehand fixation in adults with femoral neck fractures. MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL were searched from inception to 15 July 2026 without language restrictions. Google Scholar was used only as a supplementary search source, together with forward and backward citation searching. Comparative studies of robot-assisted versus freehand fluoroscopy-guided cannulated-screw fixation were included. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I, with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale used as a complementary appraisal of non-randomised studies. Random-effects meta-analyses included prediction intervals and prespecified sensitivity analyses. The protocol was registered prospectively (PROSPERO CRD420261465038). Sixteen comparative studies involving 1,293 participants were included. Of these, 597 underwent robot-assisted fixation and 696 underwent freehand fixation. Two studies reporting random allocation and 14 non-randomised studies were included in the study. Robot-assisted fixation was associated with fewer guide-wire manipulations, greater screw-placement accuracy and 13.9 fewer fluoroscopic acquisitions per procedure (95% confidence interval [CI] -20.3 to -7.5). Earlier radiographic healing and modestly higher final Harris Hip Scores were also observed. Pooled estimates suggested lower risks of union failure, avascular necrosis and composite complications. Fluoroscopy duration, overall operative time and reoperation did not differ significantly. Heterogeneity was substantial for several continuous outcomes, with prediction intervals crossing the null for several estimates, indicating that the magnitude of benefit varied considerably between studies. Some clinical associations were also sensitive to eligibility-restricted analyses. Robot-assisted cannulated-screw fixation improves technical execution compared with freehand fixation. Patient-important clinical superiority and economic value have not been established, and evidence concerning learning curves, operator acceptability and system reliability remains insufficient. Current evidence does not support routine widespread adoption; adequately powered multicentre randomised trials incorporating economic and implementation evaluation are required.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Application of Three-Dimensionally Printed Surgical Guides in Precise Sacral Tumor Excision and Defect Reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: Precise resection of sacral tumors remains technically demanding due to their deep anatomical location and close proximity to critical neurovascular structures. Conventional freehand techniques often result in suboptimal resection margins, excessive blood loss, and compromised lumbopelvic stability. This study evaluated whether patient-specific three-dimensional (3D)-printed guiding templates improve surgical accuracy and perioperative outcomes in sacral tumor resection and reconstruction. METHODS: Nineteen patients undergoing en bloc sacral tumor resection (S1-S3 involvement) with spinopelvic reconstruction (2006-2020) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into a 3D-printing group (n = 10) and a conventional freehand group (n = 9). In the 3D-printing group, computer-aided design and 3D-printed templates were used for osteotomy, screw placement, and defect reconstruction. Perioperative metrics, surgical accuracy, and complications were compared between groups using Welch's t-test and the Hodges-Lehmann method; oncologic events during follow-up were recorded descriptively. RESULTS: The 3D-printing group demonstrated significantly shorter operative time (456.5 ± 62.36 vs. 574.44 ± 114.58 min, p = 0.012), reduced blood loss (4081.40 ± 838.99 vs. 5090.0 ± 1059.67 mL, p = 0.034), and fewer fluoroscopic exposures (4.2 ± 0.79 vs. 10.0 ± 1.58, p < 0.001) compared with the conventional group. Osteotomy accuracy was also superior in the 3D-printing group, with significantly lower angular deviation (3.33° ± 0.45° vs. 6.79° ± 2.16°, p = 0.0012). Postoperative complication rates were comparable (30% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.649), but hospital stay was significantly shorter in the 3D-printing group (10.7 ± 2.71 vs. 18.11 ± 4.01 days, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patient-specific 3D-printed guiding templates enhance precision in sacral tumor excision and reconstruction, improving surgical efficiency and perioperative safety. This computer-assisted, template-guided approach represents a valuable advancement for complex sacral oncologic surgery.

Humans↗