SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “shared decision-making”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Preemptive hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in RUNX1 familial platelet disorder: a shared decision-making framework.

RUNX1 familial platelet disorder (RUNX1-FPD) is associated with a 35-50% lifetime risk of hematologic malignancy (HM). Like all germline HM predisposition syndromes, RUNX1-FPD can only be cured with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Current genetic screening techniques allow for early detection of germline predisposition and, consequently, the opportunity for HSCT before overt development of HM (i.e., preemptive HSCT). However, there is as yet no consensus on the use of preemptive HSCT for RUNX1-FPD. Described here is the case of an individual with RUNX1-FPD and a family history of HM who underwent preemptive HSCT. We introduce a shared decision-making framework designed to support individuals with RUNX1-FPD, their families, and their multidisciplinary clinical teams in evaluating whether and when to pursue preemptive HSCT versus continued surveillance. The framework reviews key medical factors that influence the decisions regarding timing of HSCT, including germline and somatic variants, clonal changes over time, familial history of HM, early morphologic or hematologic features, impacts on bleeding-related quality of life, and donor availability. The framework also summarizes the major risks and uncertainties potentially associated with preemptive HSCT while highlighting the associated ethical challenges. Together, the case and framework provide a structured, patient-centered approach for navigating the complex clinical decision of preemptive HSCT. Ongoing collaborative efforts to define cytogenetic and clonal changes preceding malignant transformation in RUNX1-FPD will refine the framework and bolster individualized treatment strategies aimed at preventing HM and improving the quality of life of individuals with RUNX1-FPD.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Making patient-oriented decisions with collegial support as an anchor: Oncologists' experiences of late-line treatment selection in metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Treatment guidelines support oncologists in treatment decision-making for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, treatment decision-making is complicated by the rapid pace of therapeutic advances, the complexity of incorporating patient preferences, and the underrepresentation of diverse populations in clinical trials. This study explored oncologists' experiences of treatment selection in late-line MBC when evidence and guidelines provide limited guidance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted using a constructivist approach and involved individual interviews with twelve oncologists in Sweden. Participants had between five and forty years of experience in breast cancer care and worked within publicly funded healthcare across academic and regional hospitals. An inductive reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify themes, with attention to both manifest and latent meanings in the data. RESULTS: The overarching theme interpreted was: Making patient-oriented treatment decisions with collegial support as an anchor, reflecting how oncologists adapt their treatment decision-making to patient needs while relying on colleagues for professional stability. Four themes were elucidated: Offering to use professional knowledge and experience to decide; Inviting the patient to a dialogue to decide; Supporting the patient in making the final decision; and Turning to colleagues for advice and support. CONCLUSION: This study challenges the positivist evidence-based assumption that oncologists act as neutral facilitators who simply present treatment options for patients to choose. Instead, it positions oncologists as active decision-makers who clearly state their professional stance, retain responsibility for treatment decisions, and respect patient autonomy, moving beyond the traditional, dichotomized shared decision-making model. IMPLICATIONS TO PRACTICE: We argue that oncologists are active stakeholders in a value-led decision-making process and encourage them to clearly articulate the values underlying their recommendations. This approach enables patients to be addressed with full autonomy, while the ultimate responsibility for treatment decisions remains with the oncologist.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

The Moral of the Story-Perception of Leadership With Moral Distress in Registered Nurses: A Qualitative Systematic Review.

AIM: To understand how Registered Nurses perceive the impact of nursing leadership on managing moral distress and mitigating burnout. BACKGROUND: Moral distress and burnout are pervasive issues in nursing, compromising well-being, patient safety and workforce sustainability. Leadership is a critical factor in shaping workplace culture and mitigating these challenges, yet evidence remains limited. DESIGN: Qualitative systematic review. METHODS: A qualitative systematic review was conducted following JBI methodology and PRISMA guidelines. Comprehensive searches across MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus identified 5927 articles, with two studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Data were appraised using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist and synthesised via meta-aggregation. Confidence in findings was assessed using the ConQual approach. RESULTS: Four major themes emerged: (1) Behind the barriers, (2) Breaking point, (3) Weathering the storm and (4) Leadership for lasting change. Leadership influenced nurses' psychological safety, ethical decision-making and resilience. Inadequate support amplified moral distress, and effective strategies included authentic communication, team solidarity and systemic interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Leadership plays a pivotal role in mitigating moral distress and burnout. Evidence highlights the need for structural changes and support to sustain registered nurses' well-being and retention. RELATIVE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Findings offer direction for leadership strategies that promote ethical workplaces, shared decision-making and mental health supports to enhance resilience and patient care. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Strengthening leadership capability is vital for workforce sustainability, care quality and nurse retention. REPORTING METHOD: Authors have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study did not involve patients or the public in its design, conduct or reporting.

Leadership↗

PubMed2026

Total ankle replacement versus nonoperative management for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis: A comparative analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of end-stage ankle osteoarthritis remains debated. This study compared short-term outcomes between non-operative treatment, total ankle replacement (TAR), and cases in which indicated surgery was delayed. METHODS: In this secondary analysis of prospectively collected data, treatment survival, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), and patient satisfaction were assessed at baseline and at 1- and 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: In a total of 316 patients one-year treatment survival was highest for TAR (99.3%), followed by NOM (94.4%) and delayed surgery (80.9%). TAR demonstrated significantly superior FAOS pain and quality-of-life scores compared with NOM and delayed surgery. Delayed surgery was associated with significantly worse pain and quality-of-life outcomes. Patient satisfaction was highest in the TAR group and lowest in the delayed surgery group. CONCLUSIONS: TAR provides superior pain relief, quality of life, and satisfaction compared with non-operative management in end-stage ankle OA. While NOM remains a valid option for selected patients, delaying indicated surgery results in inferior outcomes, underscoring the importance of timely, shared decision-making.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Preoperative intramuscular testosterone and urethrocutaneous fistula formation after primary hypospadias repair.

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative androgen stimulation is widely used before hypospadias repair to increase penile dimensions and optimise surgical conditions. However, its impact on postoperative complications, particularly urethrocutaneous fistula formation, remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between preoperative intramuscular testosterone therapy and urethrocutaneous fistula formation in children undergoing primary hypospadias repair. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective comparative analysis of prospectively collected clinical data from 111 boys undergoing primary hypospadias repair at a single tertiary pediatric urology center. Patients were divided into two groups: those who did not receive hormonal therapy (Group 1, n = 55) and those who received intramuscular testosterone enanthate (2 mg/kg administered 5 and 2 weeks before surgery; Group 2, n = 56). Preoperative penile measurements, operative characteristics, and postoperative complications were compared. The primary outcome was urethrocutaneous fistula formation. The mean follow-up duration was 11.9 months (median 7 months). RESULTS: Preoperative testosterone therapy was associated with significant increases in glans diameter and stretched penile length at the time of surgery. The hormone-treated group had a significantly higher proportion of proximal hypospadias (p = 0.001), underwent more complex urethroplasty procedures, and had longer operative times (p = 0.007). Postoperative edema and local inflammatory changes were more frequently observed in the hormone-treated group. Despite these differences, urethrocutaneous fistula occurred in four patients in each group (7.3% vs 7.1%, p = 0.357), with no statistically significant difference between groups. DISCUSSION: Despite greater baseline anatomical severity and operative complexity in the hormone-treated group, preoperative testosterone administration was not associated with an increased risk of urethrocutaneous fistula. These findings suggest that improved tissue bulk and vascularity may offset the potential adverse effects of transient inflammatory changes. CONCLUSION: Selective preoperative intramuscular testosterone therapy was not associated with increased urethrocutaneous fistula risk and may be considered a reasonable adjunct in appropriately selected patients undergoing primary hypospadias repair. CLINICAL/TRANSLATIONAL APPLICABILITY: These findings provide clinical reassurance that preoperative testosterone can be used selectively in patients with smaller penile dimensions or anticipated technical difficulty without increasing fistula risk, thereby supporting shared decision-making in clinical practice.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Maternal vaccination with RSVpreF and risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: A bivalent respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein-based vaccine (RSVpreF) was approved in the United States in August 2023 for use during pregnancy to prevent infant RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease. The pivotal phase 3 trial identified a numerical imbalance in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) that did not reach statistical significance; postmarketing observational studies have since reported inconsistent findings. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess this association. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP from inception to Jan 26, 2026, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing HDP outcomes in RSVpreF-vaccinated versus unvaccinated or placebo-receiving pregnant individuals. Unadjusted risk ratios (RRs) were pooled using a random-effects model; adjusted estimates from observational studies were pooled separately by inverse variance methods. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251026835). RESULTS: Nine studies were included (3 RCTs, 6 retrospective cohort studies; n = 148,267). RSVpreF vaccination was associated with a small but statistically significant increase in overall HDP risk (RR 1·08, 95% CI 1·02-1·13; p = 0·004; I2 = 44%), driven by the observational studies group (1·08, 1·02-1·14; I2 = 61%); RCTs showed a directionally consistent but non-significant RR (1·12, 0·87-1·43; I2 = 0%). The association was attributable to gestational hypertension, with no significant association for preeclampsia/eclampsia. CONCLUSION: Maternal RSVpreF vaccination was associated with a small increase in HDP attributable to gestational hypertension and driven primarily by observational studies, in which residual confounding remains possible. The benefits of infant RSV prevention remain substantial, and these findings support continued postmarketing surveillance and informed shared decision-making.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Risk prediction in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the LIFE-Preserved model.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) constitutes a heterogeneous disease with varying prognosis. Given the rising incidence of HFpEF, accurate risk prediction for these patients is needed to identify high-risk individuals, who may benefit the most from preventive treatments. The LIFE-Preserved model was developed and validated for the prediction of individual short-term and lifetime risk for HF hospitalization or cardiovascular (CV) death in patients with HFpEF. METHODS: LIFE-Preserved was derived in 20 332 patients aged 40-90 years with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50% from the Swedish HF Registry. Cause- and sex-specific Cox models were derived to predict the risk of HF hospitalization or CV death using 14 routinely available predictors. Use of age as the timescale allowed for predictions beyond the maximum follow-up duration in the derivation data, adjusted for competing risks. External validation was performed in two trials (EMPEROR-Preserved and TOPCAT-Americas) and three registries (NHS England Secure Data Environment, Veterans Affairs, and HF-Particles). Model performance was assessed by discrimination and calibration. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 1.8 years (interquartile range .6-4.2, maximum 19 years), 9341 first HF hospitalizations or CV deaths (46%) were observed in Swedish HF Registry. External validation included data from 28 062 patients with HFpEF [9930 (35%) first HF hospitalizations or CV deaths]. Pooled C-statistics were .714 (95% confidence interval .652-.775) in trials and .658 (95% confidence interval .599-.717 in registries, with adequate calibration in all external validation sources. Performance was similar in men and women. An interactive calculator of the LIFE-Preserved model has been made available here. CONCLUSIONS: The LIFE-Preserved model enables prediction of short-term and lifetime risk of HF hospitalization or CV death in patients with HFpEF. The model could serve as a tool to identify high-risk HFpEF patients, guiding clinical management and shared decision-making.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Quantitative Outcomes for Shared Assessment and Management in Forensic Mental Health: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Despite leading models of mental health care encouraging user involvement, users in forensic mental health (FMH) report poor involvement given the difficulty in reconciling shared approaches with risk-averse and legally mandated settings. While previous research has demonstrated qualitative benefits to shared approaches in FMH and has led to a proliferation of self-rated assessment tools, there remains to quantify agreement on self-rated tools and to clarify the impact of shared approaches on care. This meta-analysis examines (1) the correlation between clinician and user ratings, (2) the predictive validity of self-ratings for violence, and (3) the effects of shared risk management on violence and restriction in FMH. Five databases were searched from inception to April 2024, selecting for adult FMH inpatients, shared risk assessment, needs assessment or violence management as interventions, and quantitative outcomes (correlation, agreement, predictive validity, and effect on violence or restriction rates). Fifteen quantitative evaluations were retained. One of three planned meta-analyses could be conducted, with seven records providing paired clinician-user t-tests. Eleven more records provided clinical recommendations on operationalizing shared approaches. Random-effects meta-analysis showed a significant and large paired standard difference of .95 (95% CI = [.49,1.42]) across tools, with significant differences in DUNDRUM-3, DUNDRUM-4, and CANFOR sub-models. While acknowledging between-study heterogeneity, results substantiate quantitative differences where clinicians generally rate more needs and lesser progress than users across tools, showing that self-ratings can and should be used to broach collaborative discussions on needs and progress during FMH treatment. There remains an evidence gap for quantitative benefits in care outcomes and a need to standardize agreement measures for future comparisons and clinical sub-group analyses.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Estimated Long-Term Benefits of Finerenone in Heart Failure: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of the FINEARTS-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: People living with heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction have substantially curtailed life expectancy free from clinical events compared with their peers of comparable age. The nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, finerenone, was recently shown to reduce risks of cardiovascular events in this population over a median follow-up of 2.6 years; as patients with HF typically continue treatment beyond this time frame, estimating the potential long-term benefits of finerenone could inform shared clinical decision-making. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the projected long-term treatment effects of finerenone in patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction if treated over a patient's lifetime. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prespecified analyses were conducted of the FINEARTS-HF trial, a phase 3 randomized clinical trial conducted across 653 sites in 37 countries. Adults 40 years and older with symptomatic HF and left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or greater were randomized from September 2020 to January 2023. Median (IQR) follow-up was 2.6 (1.9-3.0) years. INTERVENTIONS: Finerenone (titrated to either 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary composite outcome was time to cardiovascular death or worsening HF event. The long-term gains in survival free from a primary end point with finerenone were iteratively estimated with age-based Kaplan-Meier curves using age at randomization rather than time from randomization. Differences in areas under the survival curves between the finerenone and placebo arms represented event-free survival gains. RESULTS: Among 6001 participants (median [IQR] age, 73 [66-79] years; 3269 male [54.5%]), mean survival free from the primary end point for a 55-year-old participant was 13.6 years (95% CI, 11.9-15.2 years) with finerenone and 10.5 years (95% CI, 6.8-11.3 years) with placebo, representing a gain in event-free survival of 3.1 years (95% CI, 0.8-5.4 years; P = .007). Mean event-free survival for a 65-year-old participant was 11.0 years (95% CI, 10.1-11.9 years) with finerenone and 8.9 years (95% CI, 8.1-9.8 years) with placebo, representing a gain of 2.0 years (95% CI, 0.8-3.3 years; P = .001). Projected mean event-free survival was numerically greater with finerenone than with placebo for every starting age between 50 to 80 years. Lifetime gains in event-free survival were observed even among individuals already treated with a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (65-year-old participant: 3.1 years; 95% CI, 0.1-6.0 years; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this prespecified secondary analysis of the FINEARTS-HF randomized clinical trial, long-term treatment with finerenone was estimated to extend event-free survival by up to 3 years among people with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Perspectives of participating neurologists and study nurses - Mixed-methods process evaluation of a web-based program for relapse management in multiple sclerosis (POWER@M2).

BACKGROUND: Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system and the leading cause of disability in young adults. In Germany, 90% of relapses are treated with high-dose intravenous glucocorticoids, despite limited evidence for long-term benefit and international preference for oral administration. Time constraints often hinder informed decision-making. The multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) POWER@MS2 (N = 160, 2020-2023), conducted at 18 German MS-centres, aimed to promote self-determined relapse management through a complex intervention (dialogue-based decision aid, nurse-led webinar, online-chat). OBJECTIVE: While RCTs demonstrate effectiveness, process evaluations are essential to understand implementation, mechanisms of impact and contextual factors. This study explored healthcare professionals' experiences and attitudes toward implementing relapse self-management and self-medication in clinical practice. METHODS: A mixed-methods process evaluation followed the UK Medical Research Council- framework. Quantitative data were collected via validated questionnaires at up to three time points and analysed descriptively. Interview guides were developed based on these results. Qualitative data from neurologist and study nurse interviews were thematically analysed. Results were triangulated using a joint display. RESULTS: Data were collected from 55 neurologists and 17 study nurses (quantitative) and from 7 neurologists and 4 nurses (qualitative) (2020-2024). Most neurologists opposed routine steroid use, reserving it for severe relapses. Some voiced concerns about self-management, but informed patients were generally viewed as capable of safe self-medication. Study nurses gave mixed feedback on the intervention, citing overload and improved guidance. CONCLUSION: Clinicians showed openness toward implementing the intervention. Enhancing accessibility and addressing specific concerns may support broader adoption.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Acceptability of capillary point-of-care testing: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and synthesise evidence on the acceptability and perceived experience of finger-prick point-of-care testing (POCT) among patients and clinicians across healthcare settings. DESIGN: Systematic review conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) guidelines. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane and Web of Science were searched from inception to January 2024 and re-run in July 2025, supplemented by citation tracking of relevant studies. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies reporting patient and clinicians' experiences, perceptions, satisfaction or acceptability relating to finger-prick POCT for any health condition or blood parameter were eligible. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods designs were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were extracted independently by two reviewers and synthesised using thematic analysis and narrative synthesis. Methodological quality was appraised using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: 21 studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 9128 participants (17 quantitative, 3 qualitative, 1 mixed methods). Across diverse clinical contexts, finger-prick POCT was reported as generally acceptable, less distressing and perceived as a convenient alternative to venous sampling in comparative studies. Thematic synthesis identified two major themes: (1) enhancing the patient-clinician relationship through improved engagement, communication and understanding of care and (2) clinical implications of finger-prick POCT on clinicians' workflow, confidence and skill acquisition. Finger-prick POCT was perceived to promote personalised consultations, enable immediate discussion of results and streamline decision-making. Clinicians highlighted its potential to expand task sharing, improve efficiency and strengthen continuity of care, although concerns regarding training, reliability and quality assurance were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Finger-prick POCT is generally acceptable to patients and clinicians, improving comfort, convenience, engagement and perceived efficiency. Implementation should prioritise training, infrastructure and quality assurance frameworks to maximise clinical and experiential benefits. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024512130.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Global vaccine readiness: equity-by-design in pandemic preparedness and response.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 showed that rapid vaccine development and roll-out, while lifesaving, can still yield large, avoidable harms when equity is not considered from the outset. Disparities in vaccine timing and coverage, especially in low-resource settings, amplified health and economic burdens, highlighting the need for preparedness frameworks that combine speed with fairness. AREAS COVERED: We synthesize evidence from literature and policy reports regarding global vaccine roll-out, focusing on avertable mortality under alternative sharing scenarios, procurement design, pooled mechanisms such as COVAX, and the role of distributed manufacturing and delivery capacity. We also examine how transparent data-sharing, effective public communication, genomic surveillance, adaptive trial designs, and modeling hubs can support more responsive and equitable vaccine deployment. Across six reflection points, we translate these lessons into practical priorities for future pandemic readiness, including strengthening healthcare infrastructure, equitable procurement, data transparency, and safeguarding public health decision-making from political and commercial distortion. EXPERT OPINION: We argue that equity-by-design is essential if vaccine innovation is to deliver equitable public health impact. This requires geographically distributed manufacturing, transparency, equity-conditioned advance purchase agreements, and pre-agreed, epidemiology-triggered allocation of vaccines. We recommend institutionalizing disaggregated reporting, standardized data-sharing, greater pathogen genomic sequencing capacity, and communication strategies that support public health protection while countering misinformation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Leveraging traveller genomics for LMIC diarrhoeal disease management.

Diarrhoeal pathogens impose a substantial global health burden, disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, in these settings, health-seeking behaviours, suboptimal microbiological capacity, and challenges in establishing genomics capacity constrain effective surveillance, including surveillance of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). In contrast, high-income countries routinely generate and share large volumes of diarrhoeal pathogen genomes through established systems, with a significant proportion originating from travellers returning from LMICs. These data reveal strong geographical structuring of lineages and clinically relevant AMR patterns, demonstrating untapped potential to support improvements in geographically granulated surveillance to support antimicrobial treatment recommendations. In this opinion article, we outline the potential to integrate traveller-derived microbial genomic data into LMIC public health decision-making and highlight the scientific, ethical, practical, and governance considerations for implementation.

antimicrobial resistance↗

PubMed2026

NSCLC in Vulnerable and Special Populations: Toward Personalized Care.

NSCLC encompasses a heterogeneous patient population whose clinical needs, biological features, and treatment outcomes differ substantially from those represented in pivotal studies. Adolescents and young adults, women, pregnant patients, individuals with actionable genomic alterations or constitutional pathogenic variants, immunocompromised patients, including those with chronic viral infections, older adults, patients with brain metastases, and survivors with second primary lung cancers remain consistently underrepresented in research programs. This limits the generalizability of current evidence and challenges the delivery of equitable precision oncology. Across these populations, distinct disease biology, differential genomic landscapes, sex- and age-related variations in pharmacology, and complex psychosocial or ethical considerations shape clinical decision-making. Advances in molecular testing and targeted therapies have improved outcomes for some subgroups; however, persistent disparities in diagnostic access, trial eligibility, and supportive care remain major barriers. In parallel, modern systemic agents including brain-penetrant targeted therapies, immunotherapy combinations, and antibody-drug conjugates have broadened therapeutic options, although their safety, effectiveness, and long-term consequences require dedicated evaluation in underrepresented populations. This review synthesizes contemporary evidence from these special NSCLC populations, highlighting shared challenges and unique considerations. We discuss implications for clinical practice, supportive care, survivorship, and research design and outline opportunities to strengthen inclusivity in precision oncology. Addressing longstanding gaps in representation, trial methodology, and structural inequities is essential to ensure that recent therapeutic advances translate into improved outcomes for the full spectrum of patients living with NSCLC.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Age- and sex-adjusted genomic differences between Korean and Beat AML cohorts.

Genomic profiling plays a central role in risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), yet the clinical implications of population-specific genomic architectures remain incompletely defined. We conducted a prospective, multicenter study of 603 adults with newly diagnosed AML in Korea, integrating targeted sequencing of 83 recurrently mutated genes with comprehensive clinical annotation across treatment intensities, including allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). For contextual comparison, genomic profiles were evaluated against the Beat AML cohort. The overall genomic landscape was broadly conserved, supporting shared core disease biology across populations. However, RUNX1::RUNX1T1, CEBPA, GATA2, KIT, and DDX41 mutations were more frequent in the Korean cohort, whereas FLT3 and NPM1 mutations were less common. These differences translated into a distinct distribution of European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022 risk categories, with implications for therapeutic stratification. Notably, most DDX41 alterations were germline (3.2%), highlighting the need for systematic germline evaluation with implications for genetic counseling and donor selection. Although unadjusted overall survival appeared longer in the Korean cohort, this difference was not significant after adjustment for key clinical variables. These findings indicate that population-specific genomic distributions reshape the clinical application of risk stratification and support population-aware precision medicine strategies in AML.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Integrating rare and common variation in epilepsy genetics: from genetic architecture to penetrance and clinical expressivity.

Epilepsy genetics has often been interpreted through a useful but simplified dichotomous framework in which severe epilepsies, particularly developmental and epileptic encephalopathies, are attributed mainly to rare, high-effect variants, whereas more common epilepsies are viewed as arising largely from the cumulative effects of common, small-effect variation. Although this framework has been instrumental for gene discovery, molecular diagnosis, and mechanism-based treatment, it does not fully explain incomplete penetrance, intrafamilial phenotypic heterogeneity, or marked differences in severity among individuals sharing the same molecular diagnosis. Evidence from exome sequencing, copy number variant (CNV) studies, and genome-wide association studies increasingly suggests that rare SNVs/indels, CNVs, and common variant should not be interpreted as entirely independent risk sources, but may partially converge on shared genes, pathways, cell types, and neurobiological processes relevant to neuronal excitability, network stability, and seizure susceptibility. Here, we review evidence across epilepsy subtypes, focusing on convergence and divergence across the allelic spectrum, and discuss how polygenic background and other modifiers may influence penetrance and clinical expressivity among carriers of rare pathogenic variants and CNVs. We also consider implications for variant interpretation, genetic counseling, risk stratification, and precision medicine, while emphasizing that most rare-common integrated models remain insufficiently validated for routine clinical decision-making.

common variants↗

PubMed2025

Future-proofing tuberculosis therapy: framework for concurrent drug and resistance testing development.

The rapid emergence of resistance to novel tuberculosis drugs, such as bedaquiline, is a key threat to the long-term effectiveness of novel regimens. Given that the introduction of these agents has enabled the introduction of an all-oral regimen for rifampicin-resistant and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, the rise of resistance underscores the urgent need to safeguard their efficacy and responsible use. A major barrier is the delay in developing reliable tools to detect resistance to novel compounds, which limits clinical decision-making and surveillance efforts. Herein, we outline a framework for integrating the development of drug susceptibility testing alongside tuberculosis drug development, including early stage resistance profiling and defining appropriate epidemiological cutoff values. We highlight key gaps, including the need for structured partnerships between drug developers, diagnostic manufacturers, regulators, research institutions, funders, and policy makers. We propose a roadmap to accelerate drug susceptibility testing and development of new tuberculosis regimens, ensuring that resistance detection maintains pace with the introduction of novel drugs. Establishing collaborative platforms for data sharing, genomic analysis, and diagnostic innovation will help ensure that resistance detection evolves in step with drug development, thereby preserving novel treatments and improving global tuberculosis care.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A multi-scale fusion model based on multi-phase contrast-enhanced CT for predicting pancreatic cancer resectability.

Purpose.Develop a multi-scale fusion model (MSFM) based on multi-phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) to predict pancreatic cancer (PC) resectability, thereby assisting expert decision-making.Methods.This retrospective study enrolled 280 patients with PC from four institutions, which were randomly divided into a training cohort (202 patients) and an independent test cohort (78 patients). Three-phase CECT images (arterial, venous, and delayed phases) were used for modeling. The MSFM comprises two sub-networks: (1) a multi-phase fusion network for extracting cross-phase shared fusion features, (2) a phase-specific branch network for capturing phase-specific features; and a post-fusion strategy to generate the final predictive score by integrating the shared fusion features and three groups of phase-specific features. Additionally, a human-machine fusion deep learning model (HMfDL) was constructed by fusing the predictive score of the MSFM with expert assessments.Results.In the independent test, the MSFM achieved an AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of 0.8385 (95% CI: 0.7521-0.9249), accuracy of 84.62%, sensitivity of 72.00%, and specificity of 90.57%. This performance outperformed single-phase models (AUC range: 0.7638-0.7781), two-phase models (AUC range: 0.7826-0.7864), and ten states-of-the-art classifiers (AUC range: 0.7404-0.7796). The HMfDL further improved the performance, reaching an AUC of 0.8626 (95% CI: 0.7853-0.9400), accuracy of 91.03%, sensitivity of 80.00%, and specificity of 96.23%. Notably, the HMfDL corrected 58.82% of misdiagnosis made by experts.Conclusions. The MSFM effectively fuses multi-phase CECT to enable highly accurate predictions of PC resectability, and provides valuable support for expert decision-making through HMfDL.

Humans↗